Search and find articles and topics quickly and accurately! See different advanced ways to search for articles on this site.
Quennel Gale: getting more desperate
Response on the topic “Is Jesus God because he said I am Alpha and Omega”
By Ahmed Eldin
Gale decided to respond me on the topic “is Jesus God because he said I am Alpha And Omega”. It is obvious first that he did not respond to anything; he just played around and gave his own meanings of Christianity. Personally, I will respond only according what he said about my argument. Also by reading my response, you will realize that Quennel Gale the desperate Christian kid literally invented a new doctrine of Christianity.
Concerning my argument, he says:
“Only someone who hasn’t done enough research will assume that this is superior to what Jesus or God claimed in Revelation. If he actually bothered reading this passage closely Mr. Eldin would have found out that Mel’s “neither beginning of days, nor end of life” was, MADE LIKE UNTO THE SON OF GOD!
Clearly the author of Hebrews is telling us that at best Mel was made LIKE UNTO JESUS. Hence, if the title of “neither beginning of days, nor end of life” proves that this is superior then HOW MUCH MORE SUPERIOR IS CHRIST WHOM MEL IS NOTHING MORE THAN A MERE COPY OF? Notice that the Son of God wasn’t made like unto Mel but it was the other way around! Apparently Mr. Eldin didn’t see this or he is blatantly ignoring it.
However, this isn’t even the fun part, as A.T. Robertson explains:
Without father, without mother, without genealogy (apatwr, amhtwr, agenealoghto/B>). Alliteration like Romans 1:30, the first two old words, the third coined by the author (found nowhere else) and MEAING SIMPLY "DEVOID OF ANY GENEOLOGY." The argument is that from silence, made much of by Philo, but not to be pressed. The record in Genesis tells nothing of any genealogy. Melchizedek stands alone. He is not to be understood as a miraculous being without birth or death. Melchizedek has been made more mysterious than he is BY READING INTO THIS INTERPRETATION WHAT IS NOT THERE. Made like (apwmoiwmeno/B>). Perfect passive participle of apomoiow, old verb, to produce A FACSIMILE OR COPY, only here in N.T. The likeness is in the picture drawn in Genesis, not in the man himself. Such artificial interpretation does not amount to proof, but only serves as a parallel or illustration. Unto the Son of God (twi uiwi tou qeou). Associative instrumental case of uio/B>. Abideth a priest (menei iereu/B>). According to the record in Genesis, the only one in his line just as Jesus stands alone, but with the difference that Jesus continues priest in fact in heaven. Continually (eiߠto dihneke/B>). Old phrase (for the continuity) like eiߠton aiwna, in N.T. only in Hebrews (Romans 7:3; Romans 10:1,14,21). (Source)
Based on the Greek, Melchizedek’s “superiority in existence” IS INTENDED TO BE A FACSMILE OR COPY OF JESUS’ ETERNAL BEING AND PRIESTHOOD! This means that Jesus is the reality of which Mel is merely a copy of, and yet Mr. Eldin claims that a copy is supposed to be better than the original!
This guy needs to stop writing articles since he is killing the credibility of Osama Abdallah and his minions! (On second thought, we want him to continue writing since he helps us expose why Osama’s website is a colossal joke and why Islam is a false religion!)
This verse best describes Mr. Eldin, Sami Zaatari and the rest of the goons at the Answering Nothing website:
His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, WHICH IGNORANT AND UNSTABLE PEOPLE DISTORT, as they do the other Scriptures, TO THEIR OWN DESTRUCTION.” 2 Peter 3:16”
It is very clear that according to Gale we have now two sons of God. Jesus and Mels. As you see, Gale invented out of nothing a religion with 4 Gods ( Father, Jesus, Holy Spirit, and now Mels). Gale support that Mels is a copy of Jesus, I wonder if any Christian worship Mels. The funny thing is that in order Gale to support his polytheistic theory he consults A.T Robertson because simply he canot find anywhere in the bible that Mels is a copy of Jesus. Now Gale must also worship the “copy” of Jesus.
However, the main problem remains. Jesus has nothing to do with Mel’s. This ignorant missionary likes to read commentaries that suit him and not to read what his unholy book says.
1. For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him;
2. To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace;
3. Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually
Now I am going to analyze what I read, and I hope Gale will not run away from answering as he did. Above from the verse we see that this Mel had no Father, no Mother, and no descent, right? Now I am asking the kid Gale, how Mels can be a copy of Jesus when Jesus had a Mother, a Father and a descent. Mels was made like unto the son of God because they had common purpose, that is to preach (verse 3), otherwise we have a contradiction. Simple and straightforward question. Clearly, Mels by having no mother no father and no descent is much more superior to Jesus. Mels is like unto the son only as priest. There is no evidence that Mels is Jesus or he is a copy of him as the desperate Christian polytheist try to say. This man is a total joke when he speaks this kind of nonsense. Moreover, I challenge Gale to show me where Jesus said, “I have a copy and his name is Mels”. Indeed ridiculous and childish statements. Now Gale must admit that he do not believe any more in the pagan Trinity but in “Tetranity” as far as he consider also Mels a God (4 Gods)
How can Jesus be a God when he is not clean and pure and he is a worm( indicating his inferiority to God)
4. How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean that is born of a woman?
5. Behold even to the moon, and it shineth not; yea, the stars are not pure in his sight.
6. How much less man, that is a worm? and the son of man, which is a worm?
Are you still insist that Jesus is God ?
Gale please bring some real arguments and don’t waste my time.