Search and find articles and topics quickly and accurately! See different advanced ways to search for articles on this site.
Rebuttal to Silas's Article "MUHAMMAD AND THE DEATH OF KINANA"
This article is in response to http://answering-islam.org.uk/Silas/kinana.htm
oldest extant biography of Muhammad is called the "Sirat Rasulallah"
"Life of the Prophet of Allah". This
book was written by Ibn Ishaq, a devout Muslim scholar, and later revised by Ibn Hisham. It was written before any of the major works of
Hadith. It is considered the most authentic
biography of Muhammad. It was translated into
English by A. Guillaume as "The Life of Muhammad".
"Kinana al-Rabi, who had the custody of the
treasure of Banu Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (Tabari says "was brought"),
to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning
early. When the apostle said to Kinana,
"Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" He said "Yes". The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be
excavated and some of the treasure was found. When
he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to
al-Zubayr Al-Awwam, "Torture him until you extract what
he has." So he kindled a fire with flint
and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then
the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge
for his brother Mahmud."
Many anti Islamics have used this incident of the torture of Kinana to attack the integrity of the Prophet. When I first read about it, I myself was quite shocked that the Prophet would torture some one just because of some treasure.
Indeed Islam teaches us that treatment of the prisoners of war is a must. For the evidence you can read
Now back to the Kinana issue. Actually the source of this story is invalid. Not because the source is weak, but because there is no source!
Having left Medina and settled at Khaibar, the Banu Nadir started hatching a wide-spread conspiracy against Islam. Their leaders, Sallam Ibn Abi-al Huqauaiq, Huyayy Ibn Akhtab, Kinana al-Rabi and others came to Mecca, met the Quraish and told them that Islam could be destroyed."
(Allama Shibli Nu'Mani, Sirat-Un-Nabi, volume II, p 106)
This goes to show that Kinana was a war criminal. Lets read on...
" While describing the battle of Khaibar, the history writers have committed a serious blunder in reporting a totally baseless report, which has become a common place. It is said that the Prophet ( Peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) had granted amnesty to the Jews on condition that they would not hide anything. When Kinana Ibn Rabi' refused to give any clue to the hidden treasures, the Prophet ( peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) ordered Zubair to adopt stern measures to force a disclosure. Zubair branded his chest with a hot flint again and again, till he was on the point of death. At last he ordered Kinana to be put to death and all the Jews were made slaves.
The whole truth in the story is that Kinana was put to death. But it was not for his refusal to give a clue to the hidden treasure. He was put to death because he had killed Mahmud Ibn Maslama (also Muslima). Tabari had reported it in unambiguous words: " Then the Holy Prophet (Peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) gave Kinana to Muhammad Ibn Maslama (Muslima), " and he put him to death in retaliation of the murder of his own brother, Mahmud Ibn Maslama (Muslima)."
In the rest of the report, both Tabari and Ibn Hisham have quoted it from Ibn Ishaq, but Ibn Ishaq does not name any narrator. Traditionalists, in books on Rijal, have explicitly stated that Ibn Ishaq used to borrow from the Jews stories concerning the battle of the Prophet (Peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). As Ibn Ishaq does not mention the name of any narrator whatsoever in this case, there is every likelihood of the story of having been passed on by the Jews.
That a man should be tortured with burns on his chest by the sparks of a flint is too heinous a deed for a Prophet (Peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) who had earned for himself the title of Rahma'lil Alamin (Mercy for all the worlds). After all, did he not let the woman who had sought to poison him go scot free? Who would expect such a soul to order human body to be so burnt for the sake of a few coins.
As a matter of fact, Kinana Ibn Rabi Ibn al-Huquaiq had been granted his life on the condition that he would never break faith or make false statements. He had also given his word, according to one of the reports, that if he did anything to the contrary, he could be put to death. Kinana played false, and the immunity granted to him was withdrawn. He killed Mahmud Ibn Maslama (Muslima) and had, therefore to suffer for it, as we have already stated on the authority of Tabari."
(Allama Shibli Nu'Mani, Sirat-Un-Nabi, volume II, p173-174)
As we can see there is no evidence what so ever for this story of Kinana because there is no narration or source given. It was contrary to the teachings of the Quran and the Prophet's character. Therefore, Christians have to stop using this argument against the glorious Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
Back to My Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.
Rebuttals to Silas' articles section.
Rebuttals by Bassam Zawadi.
Send your comments.
Back to Main Page.