Author Topic: A hilarious comparison by David Wood  (Read 1701 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline A proud Muslim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« on: January 26, 2018, 03:44:42 PM »
Hello there, I just thought about David Wood and decided to watch a new video from his videos, and then I realized how weak and funny his points were. I can't share the link here. However, you can watch it on youtube. David wood made many comparisons between The prophet Muhammad(Peace be upon him) and Paul, but a one comparison is enough to show that all his videos are blatant lies.

So, without further ado, let's get started.


7:58
Paul vs. The prophet Muhammad(Peace be upon him): Conclusion (PvM)


-He says that our prophet was illiterate caravan trader and Paul was an brilliant scholar
Well that was hilarious because being illiterate doesn't make you inferior to someone. Our prophet was sent as a messanger not as a fighter, or a scientist. This is like comparing a football player to a swimmer

-He says that Paul died an honorable death as martyr while our prophet died a disgraceful death like a false prophet
Hmmm.....He is pointing out that our prophet was poisoned, but actually anyone who studies Islamic history will know that our prophet wasn't killed, but rather died like normal people. The angle of death even asked him whether he wants to die or to stay alive. There's enough respones for the hadith of poisoning.

He says that our prophet's message insults Jesus while Paul's message honors Jesus
Actually we as Muslims are supposed to respect all prophets of Islam, and Jesus is one of them, so I guess no.

-He says that our prophet spoke none of relevant languages while Paul spoke all of the relevant languages.
How on earth will that make Paul better than our prophet?! What kind of logic do you use, David Wood?

-He says that our prophet's teachings were heavily influenced by paganism while paul's weren't
Because pagans didn't want justice. They always considered poor people inferior to them, and they treated black people worse than animals.

I think these 3 points are enough to show you how a blatant liar, and an illogical man is David Wood.



Offline A proud Muslim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2018, 03:45:36 PM »
I meant 5, not 3. Sorry for that

Offline Sama

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2018, 07:15:02 AM »
WHAT is the relevant language  :P

Online shaad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2018, 10:00:46 AM »
Seriously is that guy a 12 yr old?

Online shaad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2018, 10:08:07 AM »
Obviously he's not but look at his logic...seriously...

Offline Albarra

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2018, 11:13:37 AM »
Yeah I watched two videos couple weeks ago.

It's weird that David Wood did not refute Answering-Christianity's articles about Paul. I guess he is a fat coward.



What about Paul vs. Jesus? lol!


Offline Albarra

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2018, 11:43:41 AM »
Seriously is that guy a 12 yr old?

I guess so. XD
 

Offline Sama

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2018, 11:55:24 AM »
Add this video by "Mahir Adnan"
He says that our prophet's message insults Jesus while Paul's message honors Jesus

Response:
Christians actually curse him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO5lGJx8JU8

Offline Sama

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2018, 11:58:00 AM »
Don’t be like the pagans!
And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him. (Matthew 6:7-8)
And ye shall not walk in the manners of the nation, which I cast out before you: for they committed all these things, and therefore I abhorred them. (Leviticus 20:23)
The Church Father Iranaeus condemned Paul for inventing ‘Christianity’ from pagan beliefs:
Iranaeus believed in One God and supported the doctrine of the manhood of Jesus. He bitterly criticized Paul for being responsible for injecting doctrines of the pagan religions and Platonic philosophy into Christianity. (Muhammad Ataur-Raheem, Jesus Prophet of Islam, 1992 edition, p. 77)
The pagans used to wear tattoos and eat swine, the unclean pig. The “Christians” are imitating them today:
'Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves. I am the LORD. (Leviticus 19:28)
And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he [is] unclean to you.
No Images or Hymns Available
Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcase shall ye not touch; they [are] unclean to you. (Leviticus 11:7-8)
The Bible says that decorating trees is PAGAN; this refers to the “Christmas tree”.
For the customs of the people [are] vain: for [one] cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.
No Images or Hymns Available
They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. (Jeremiah 10:3-4)
Paul corrupted the teachings of Jesus claiming that his supposed “sacrifice on the cross” is the only way to salvation. We have already seen how this concept is false, according to the Bible itself, and the Gospel of the Nazorenes.

After Jesus’s time, there came to be two sects of Christians: those who followed St. Paul (who is the real founder of modern Christianity) and those who followed the Apostles of Jesus. In course of time, the Pauline sect overshadowed the Apostles’ sect. So Paul’s own writings, as well as the Gospels written under his influence, came to be accepted by the later Christian Church as Scripture.

http://www.islamonline.net/askaboutislam/display.asp?hquestionID=8061
The Gospels are Hellenistic religious narratives in the tradition of the Greek Septuagint version of the Old Testament, which constituted the “Scriptures” to those Greek-speaking Christians who wrote the four canonical Gospels and who appealed to it, explicitly or implicitly, in nearly every paragraph they wrote. (Randal Helms, Gospel Fictions, p. 16)
The New Testament was written under the influence of Paul, the four Gospel writers were Gentile converts to Pauline Christianity. Hence, there is nothing Jewish about the New Testament, it was solely written for Pauline Christians whose background was pagan.
The Hebrew Scriptures of the Nazarenes and Ebionites were destroyed by the Pauline Church. The original sayings of Jesus were lost forever. The New Testament today exists in Greek, and not Hebrew or Aramaic, the spoken tongues of Jesus.
The Gospel of Matthew seems to be the “most Jewish” book in the New Testament,
Luke was a Gentile and not eye-witness
Mark was Barnabas’s nephew and not eye-witness
John was martyred decades before the Gospel (bearing his name) was even written.
Nevertheless, the four Gospels are NOT mentioned by name before the year 190 CE. We have scholarly quotations to back this claim.
Unfortunately, the sources we have on Jesus are very scarce and scanty, Ignatius (died 110 CE) records the baptism of Jesus but he fails to record any thing else.
The Apostolic Church Fathers never mention the miracles in the Gospels; they fail to mention the four Gospels by name. The story of the “resurrection” (as told in the Gospels) was fabricated later because they fail to record it. The seven epistles of Ignatius fall into the category of silence, they speak nothing about Jesus.
Paul has written his own personal account of the “resurrection” which contradicts the Gospels. In conclusion, the Gospels are fabricated because Philo Judaeus and many other historians fail to mention their supernatural events.
The New Testament makes it clear that nobody witnessed the “resurrection”, the disciples never witnessed the “resurrection”, they all ‘forsook him and fled’ at Gethsemane.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/sami_zaatri/pagan_beliefs_in_christianity.htm
http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/anti_christ_paul_1.htm

Offline Sama

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: A hilarious comparison by David Wood
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2018, 11:59:22 AM »
The illiterate Prophet, Deedat:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WHgan2EQvw