That doesn’t seem likely that you just say they just rounded the result to 10….Why would they do that? Or perhaps this hadith is just like the plethora of hadiths that have internal contradictions?
That's something we see in daily life . I don't know about you though . There is no reason to say this is impossible . The hilarious thing though is that you claim none was ever able to discover this "dangerous" contradiction until you showed up .
So instead of attacking the argument, you make fun or it and relate it to abracadabra. What did expect of you? That’s all you do. Why do I even bother. Let me know when you can do constructive criticism
You expect me to criticize something that has no value to criticize ? And what's all of this if you can see ?
Absolute nonsense !! You claim Allah talks to us in Abracadabra ?! You claim that all those people who didn't know the nonsense of this "code" used to be blind believers ?! And then you dare with utmost absurdity compare Sunnah to a game of "Your phone is broken" ?! You don't believe Allah can create humans directly but you believe in a fairy tale such as evolution ?! You don't believe in Hadith but believe in a Da Vinci code ?! And you take the words of Osama over the words of the lord ?! YOU'RE the only one contradicting himself here !
1 - You're saying that people used to believe blindly .
2 - You don't accept a science established following the teachings of Quran but you believe in some codes you make up ?!
3 - You have no evidence from Quran - which you claim you follow - that there is such a code . And then you claim there's no evidence for Sunnah ?!
4 - Anyone can come up with such a "code" if they want from anything . Christians do so with their Bible as well . And there is no basis to these codes . I saw a guy trying to bring the number of prayers using some code he made up with no basis for it . This doesn't differ .
I have presented the argument with structured reasons as to why the best translation is “perfects” and even forwarded it to you and still no response. You again appeal to authority. I can appeal to authority too! "Sahih International interpreted ahsana as “perfects” therefore I am right" 
That’s not how I argue. I argue with reasons not appealing to authority.
If only I got a dollar each time you repeat "I argue with reason" and its variants , I would have been a millionaire by now . Here it is again :
أَحْسَنَ: ( فعل )
أحسنَ / أحسنَ إلى / أحسنَ بـ يُحسِن ، إحسانًا ، فهو محسِن ، والمفعول مُحسَن - للمتعدِّي
أحسنَ الشَّخصُ : فعل ما هو حَسَنٌ ، ضدّ أساء { إِنْ أَحْسَنْتُمْ أَحْسَنْتُمْ لأَنْفُسِكُمْ }
أَحْسَنَ إِلَيْهِ وَبِهِ : أَعْطَاهُ الحَسَنَةَ
أَحْسَنَ الشيءَ : أَجاد صُنعه ، وفي التنزيل العزيز : غافر آية 64 وَصَوَّرَكُمْ فَأَحْسَنَ صُوَرَكُمْ ) )
أَحْسَنَ العَزْفَ على الكَمانِ : أَتْقَنَهُ
So show us your so called "Reasonable argument" . Hint : Saying "Evolution is true and screw logic" doesn't help .
Show Posts
