Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Sharif

Pages: [1] 2
1
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Is Positron Channel refuted?
« on: January 17, 2017, 07:52:22 PM »
<Removed>

2
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Is false the Quran Challenge?
« on: January 14, 2017, 10:39:10 AM »
<Removed>

3
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / What is Macoraba?
« on: January 13, 2017, 09:54:32 PM »
Salam Aleikum. In internet, i found this web:

historyofmecca.com

Does somebody know the topic of that web? I have read a little, but the little I understand is that the pages claim that Mecca was not in Mecca originally, but in Petra, and puto some examples of qiblas of the 1st century of Hijra which are oriented to Petra and not to Mecca. What is the reply to this? Thanks Salam Aleikum.

4
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Did muslims invent something?
« on: November 27, 2016, 11:50:27 AM »
Salam Aleikum, brothers, I have watched an articule of Wikiislam.net which says that Muslims did not invent anything, and that our inventors are only copyists of the ancients peoples. They say that even the Algebra is not a muslim invention, nor even the flying. And say that the medieval Christians did not think that earth was flat, but round. Please look at this. Thanks, Salam Aleikum

5
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Why too many muslims left Islam?
« on: November 19, 2016, 07:01:22 PM »
In <> there is a page in which there are many too many testimonies of Muslims of many countries who left Islam and converted to different ideologies. Even there are links of news which say that there are thousands and almost millions of Muslims leaving Islam. One of those, even, says that 667 Muslims convert to Christianity just in ONLY A HOUR, and even Shaykhs and people who know many about Islam. What does this mean? Please explains me, may Allah help us.  THANKS MANY THANKS AND SALAMS.

6
Salam Aleikum, in 1698, Louis Maracci publicates Refutatio Alcorani, It is in latin language, and it is said that refutes the Qur'an sura by sura. What do you know about this?

https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_-KZEAAAAcAAJ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Maracci

TRANKS FOR ALL, SALAM ALEIKUM.

7
In a site, what is in arabic, says that Jeremiah 8:8 does not refer to an alteration of the Bible. However, I cannot understand very well, because it is in arabic., Please, comebody could help me with this? Thank you so much:

https://www.linga.org/defense-articles/NzQ3Nw

8
Answering-islam is trying to refute the arguments of Islamic-awareness about the story of Sheba. They say that the Jersulamen Talmud, which is even PRE-CHRISTIAN contain references about that Talmud. So, that talmud existed in times of Muhammad (saw). SO, according to them, Muhammad borrowed it. This is the article:

http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Saifullah/sheba.htm

And also say that the Sheba's story is false in that article. They say too that the tractate Sopherim, which according to them is older that the Quran, contains cites of Targum Esther. But I researched, and the Tractate Sopherim is not older than Qur'an, and the best, It is a NON-CANONICAL book:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soferim_(Talmud)

This is the unit that I have refuted. I give you thanks for this. Assalamu Aleikum brothers.

9
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Is Islam for all mankind?
« on: July 16, 2016, 09:36:04 AM »
Salam Aleikum brothers, Ali Sina published an article in which he argues that Islam is not for all mankind because the Qur'an says that God sends a messenger and a book in the language of his people, namely, that the Qur'an is written in arabic, so this book is only for the arabs because it's is in their language. It's no for another peoples because another peoples speaks in other languages, and because God only sends siomething in the language of a people, the Qur'an can't be for them. What do you think? Greetings. Salam Aleikum

10
Salam Aleikum Brothers, I found this in a debate between christians about Jeremiah 8:8.

This is the page: http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/33802/does-jeremiah-88-imply-that-the-scriptures-were-corrupted

somebody was talking against the idea that the scriptures were altered according to Jeremiah 8:8, he said:

First, some background information. Jeremiah was prophesying during the reign of Josiah, whose father was Amon and whose grandfather was Manasseh. As it says in chapter 1 of the book of Jeremiah: "The words of Jeremiah, the son of Hilkiah, one of the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin, to whom the word of the Lord came in the days of Josiah the son of Amon, king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign." Manasseh was so evil that even though his grandson, Josiah, purged the land of the idols, it says in 2 Kings 23, “Still the LORD did not turn from the burning of his great wrath, by which his anger was kindled against Judah, because of all the provocations with which Manasseh had provoked him. And the LORD said, “I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and I will cast off this city that I have chosen, Jerusalem, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there.” Because of the evil of Manasseh and his son, Amon, the ark of God, which contained the book of the law, was most likely hidden during Manasseh’s reign. We at least know that the ark was not in its place in the temple until Josiah told the priests to put it there, as it says in 2 Chr. 35:3: “And he said to the Levites who taught all Israel and who were holy to the LORD, “Put the holy ark in the house that Solomon the son of David, king of Israel, built.” This is probably because Manasseh put idols in the temple, so they moved the ark away. Even though Josiah was doing good, the evil of the two previous kings had its lasting effects. This wasn't just with the scribes that Jeremiah was talking about, it was also with the prophets and priests, as Jeremiah says in chapter 5 of the book of Jeremiah: “An appalling and horrible thing has happened in the land: the prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction; my people love to have it so, but what will you do when the end comes?” However, the true book of the Law was always around--it was in the ark. In 2 Kings 22, the true book of the Law was found, and this was in the 18th year of Josiah’s reign. “In the eighteenth year of King Josiah, the king sent Shaphan the son of Azaliah, son of Meshullam, the secretary, to the house of the LORD…And Hilkiah the high priest said to Shaphan the secretary, “I have found the Book of the Law in the house of the LORD.” And Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan, and he read it. And Shaphan the secretary came to the king, and reported to the king, “Your servants have emptied out the money that was found in the house and have delivered it into the hand of the workmen who have the oversight of the house of the LORD.” Then Shaphan the secretary told the king, “Hilkiah the priest has given me a book.” And Shaphan read it before the king.” This shows that while the "lying pen of the scribes" might have been doing what the prophets and priests were also doing, God still maintained His true word. In fact, when the book of the Law was read, people repented. So you see, even though people will try to claim that this reference that says, “the lying pen of the scribes…” means that the true scriptures weren’t around, 2 Kings 22 says otherwise. Jeremiah was rebuking the ones that tried to put forth corruptions, but he had the true one with him. In fact, it might have been upon seeing the true one that he realized what the contemporary scribes--probably under the influence of the last two kings--had done.

Have you refuted this?? Thans for all. Salam Aleikum brothers

11
Salam Aleikum, I founded an articule that I think should be refuted because in searching-islam.com I did not found any articule about this (may be I searched bad). Now, the articule says that the Islam, and specifically the Ramadan have their origin in pagan rituals which were copied by the Islam, what do you opine of this? http://www.islam-bible-prophecy.com/book/the-islamic-pagan-root.pdf

12
A time ago, I listened that the verse 21:30 of the Quran was borrowed from ancient pagan, in this verse the Quran talks about the Big Bang and according to wahat i have heard, this theory was present in form of Mythology many centuries before the Quran, the user mendacium remedium made this very question here, but he did not obtain a reply: http://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=1046.0

So, I wanted to know if this is refuted, here or in another page, also I founded an important thing, a "muslim" page said that the quran scientific miracles are false, because that was before in other scriptures, who is that man? an anti-muslim; why did he say that?: http://www.hamzatzortzis.com/essays-articles/exploring-the-quran/does-the-quran-contain-scientific-miracles-a-new-approach/

Is truth what he said? The miracles that he "refuted" are the unit miracles in the Quran?, namely, are the Quran scientific miracles refuted? THANKS, SALAM ALEIKUM

13
Salam Aleikum brothers, what do you opine of Sina's challenge, that really is very scandalous, have somebody refute him? does nobody have winned the CHALLENGE? WHY? The Challenge is here:

http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm

Can somebody win this? And I am not talking about money and the converssion of him, but about truth, thanks.

SALAM ALEIKUM

14
Salam Aleikum brothers, I have bumped me with christians who says that the Quran says that Allah is the Devil and Jesus is the unit way; for them, this is the argument: The Quran in chapter 43, verses 61-62 says:

(61) Verily he [i.e., Jesus) is a portent of the Hour. So be in no doubt concerning it and follow Me. This is the Straight Way. (62) Let not Satan astray you (from believing in the Hour), for surely he is your open enemy.

So, they say that because Satan is the one who astrays and Allah also (2:26), so they are one and the same; and to concluding, they say that the voice in 43:61 is of Jesus, so, according to them: Jesus is saying to us that he is the way, and that Allah is not God. What is the reply of this? Thanks SALAM ALEIKUM.

15
Salam Aleikum Brothers, in a short article of wikiislam.net, I founded that, according to them, there were advanced info in the 7 century about the Embriology, and that, for them, the fact that the Qur'an contains it is not a miracle: Is this truth?

http://www.wikiislam.net/wiki/History_of_Embryology

Fecha   Fuente   Texto
1416 aC   Garbha Upinandas (texto hindú)   "A partir de la conjugación de la sangre y semen el embrión entra en existencia. Durante el período favorable de la concepción, después de la relación sexual, (it) se convierte en un Kalada (de un día de edad del embrión). Después de permanecer siete noches se convierte en una vesícula. después de quince días se convierte en una masa esférico de. después de un mes se convierte en una masa firme ". [1]
1000 aC   Libro de Job (texto judeocristiana)   "Tus manos me formaron y me hicieron -? Os ahora me absorber Recuerda que tú me formaste como si con arcilla -?. ¿Me volverá al polvo me derrama como la leche, y me tiran juntos como un queso me revestidos de piel y la carne, y [dentro de mí], ¿las entretejen huesos y tendones ". [2]
500 aC   Salmos (texto judeocristiana)   "Porque tú formaste mis entrañas,. Me formaste en el vientre de mi madre Te alabo porque soy una creación admirable; sus obras son maravillosas, y esto lo sé bien mis huesos no se te ocultaban, cuando me hicieron. en el lugar secreto. Cuando estaba entretejido en lo más profundo de la tierra, sus ojos vieron mi cuerpo sin forma. Todos los días ordenados para mí fueron escritos en su libro antes de que uno de ellos llegaron a ser ". [3]
460-370 aC   Hipócrates   1ª etapa: "El esperma es un producto que viene de todo el cuerpo de cada padre, el esperma débil procedente de las partes débiles y fuertes esperma de las partes fuertes." [4]
2ª etapa: ". La semilla (embrión) y, a continuación, está contenida en una membrana ... Por otra parte, crece a causa de la sangre de su madre, que desciende hasta el útero Por una vez una mujer concibe, ella deja de menstruar ..." [5] 3ª etapa: "en esta etapa, con el descenso y la coagulación de la sangre de la madre, la carne empieza a formar, con el ombligo." [6]
4ª etapa: "a medida que la carne crece, se forma en miembros distintos de respiración ... Los huesos crecen con fuerza ... además que envían ramas de un árbol ... " [7]

384-322 aC   Aristóteles   "Cuando el material secretado por la hembra en el útero ha sido fijado por el semen del macho ... la parte más sólida se une, el líquido se separa de ella, y como las partes terrosas solidifican membranas forman a su alrededor. ..Some de éstos son llamados membranas y otros choria ... " [8] " Así que la naturaleza ha diseñado en primer lugar los dos vasos sanguíneos del corazón, y de éstos más pequeños vasos rama fuera del útero, formando lo que se llama el ombligo. ..Round estos es un tegumento similar a la piel, debido a la debilidad de los vasos necesita protección y refugio. los vasos se unen al útero como las raíces de las plantas, ya través de ellos el embrión recibe su alimento ". [9]
240-180 aC   Diocles de Caristo   "en el noveno día algunos puntos de la sangre, en los latidos del corazón XVIII, en el vigésimo séptimo rastros de la médula espinal y la cabeza" [10]
129-210 dC   Claudio Galeno   "dividamos la creación del feto en general en cuatro períodos de tiempo. La primera es aquella en la que. como se ve tanto en abortos y en la disección, la forma del semen prevalece [nutfah árabe]. En este momento, Hipócrates demasiado , el todo maravilloso, sin embargo, no llama la conformación del animal un feto; como hemos escuchado hace un momento, en el caso de esperma anulados en el sexto día, todavía lo llama semen Pero cuando se ha llenado de sangre [árabe. alaqa], y el corazón, el cerebro y el hígado son todavía no articulada y sin forma aún tienen por ahora una cierta solidaridad y tamaño considerable, este es el segundo período ; la sustancia del feto tiene la forma de carne y ya no la forma de semen de acuerdo con ello. se verá que Hipócrates demasiado ya no llama tal forma el semen, pero, como se ha dicho, el feto. El tercer período es consecuencia de esto, cuando, como se ha dicho, es posible ver las tres partes dominantes clara y una especie de esquema, una silueta, por decirlo así, de todas las otras partes [árabe mudgah]. Usted va a ver la conformación de las tres partes requeridas para mayor claridad, la de las partes del estómago más débilmente, y mucho más aún, la de las extremidades. . Más tarde se forman "ramas", como lo expresó Hipócrates, que indica con el término de su similitud con ramas El período cuarta y última está en la etapa en que todas las partes de las extremidades se han diferenciado; y en esta parte de la maravillosa Hipócrates ya no llama al feto solamente un embrión, pero ya un niño, también cuando dice que se masturba y se mueve como un animal ya completamente formado. " [11]



"... Ha llegado el momento de que la naturaleza de articular los órganos de forma precisa y traer todas las piezas hasta su finalización. Por lo tanto, causó carne para crecer en y alrededor de todos los huesos, y al mismo tiempo ... se hizo en los extremos de los huesos ligamentos que los unen entre sí, y a lo largo de toda su longitud se colocan alrededor de ellos en todos los lados las membranas delgadas, llamadas perióstica, en la que causó carne para crecer ". [12]

California. 200 dC   Talmud (texto judío)   El embrión se llama habbetten peri (fruto del cuerpo) y se desarrolla como:
1. golem (cosa sin forma, enrollada);
2. shefir meruqqam (feto bordado - shefir significa saco amniótico);
3. 'ubbar (algo que lleva); v'alad (niño); qayama v'alad shel (niño noble o viable) y
4. ben-ella Kallu chadashav (niño cuya meses se ha completado). [13]

571-632 dC   Muhammad Ibn Abdallah   "Apóstol de Alá, el verdadero y verdaderamente inspirado dijo:" (La cuestión de la creación de) un ser humano es poner juntos en el útero de la madre en cuarenta días, y luego se convierte en un coágulo de sangre espesa por un período similar, y luego un pedazo de carne por un período similar. " [14]
"El Profeta dijo:" Allah pone un ángel a cargo del útero y el ángel dice: "Oh Señor, (es) de semen! Oh Señor, (que es ahora) un coágulo! Oh Señor, (que es ahora) una pedazo de carne ". Y luego, si Dios desea para completar su creación, el ángel pregunta: "Señor, (será) un macho o una hembra"? [15]
"Hemos creado al hombre de un producto de la tierra mojada; Luego lo colocó como una gota (de semillas) en un alojamiento seguro; Luego formado Nos la caída de un coágulo, a continuación, formado Nos coágulo un embrión y, a continuación, formado Nosotros, los pequeños huesos a tanto alzado, a continuación, vestidos los huesos con carne, y luego produce como otra creación. ¡Bendito sea Allah, el mejor de los creadores! " [16]

Pages: [1] 2

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube