Answering Christianity Research Center

MAIN BOARD (You must register to post) => GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS => Topic started by: Tanveer on April 03, 2013, 04:10:05 PM

Title: Russell's Teapot.
Post by: Tanveer on April 03, 2013, 04:10:05 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

What do you guys think of this? Do you think the burden of proof is on us to prove God exists or is it on the atheists? Personally, i dont feel obligated to prove God exists, i just personally believe it. If i did have to prove it, i still wouldnt, as the burden of proof is on the accuser- not the accused.
Title: Re: Russell's Teapot.
Post by: zulfiqarchucknorris on April 03, 2013, 05:17:01 PM
peace
online, i found many articles that prove the existance of God
if you do an online search you will certainly prove it.
Peace
Title: Re: Russell's Teapot.
Post by: Tanveer on April 03, 2013, 05:25:32 PM
peace
online, i found many articles that prove the existance of God
if you do an online search you will certainly prove it.
Peace
Bro Zulfiqar, i think you misunderstood my post. :P My question isnt "How can i prove God exists?" but "Do you believe in the Russell's Teapot Analogy?".
Title: Re: Russell's Teapot.
Post by: zulfiqarchucknorris on April 04, 2013, 02:15:36 PM
Peace
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

What do you guys think of this? Do you think the burden of proof is on us to prove God exists or is it on the atheists? Personally, i dont feel obligated to prove God exists, i just personally believe it. If i did have to prove it, i still wouldnt, as the burden of proof is on the accuser- not the accused.
Sorry
I but i believe you need proof to prove something exists, or at least something that hints it.
Title: Re: Russell's Teapot.
Post by: Tanveer on April 05, 2013, 05:25:37 AM
Peace
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

What do you guys think of this? Do you think the burden of proof is on us to prove God exists or is it on the atheists? Personally, i dont feel obligated to prove God exists, i just personally believe it. If i did have to prove it, i still wouldnt, as the burden of proof is on the accuser- not the accused.
Sorry
I but i believe you need proof to prove something exists, or at least something that hints it.
Interesting. Thanks Bro Zulfiqar.