Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - AMuslimDude213

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 ... 42
Concerning the name Allah this is from a christian blog:
The normal generic word for God is "alaha"/"aloho" (ܐܠܗܐ), which is linguistically related to the Hebrew word for God "elohim".

The translation of the tetragrammaton, YHWH, on the other hand, is "maria"/"morio" (ܡܪܝܐ), usually decomposed as mar-yah, Lord-Yah ("mar", lord, also being used by syriac speaking churches as a title for saints/doctors of the Church: "mor Ephrem" = Saint Ephrem). (Note: this word has nothing to do with the proper name Maria, coming from the Hebrew Mariam)

To answer your question, Jesus would almost certainly have used one of the two, or both at the same time as it is commonly done in Syriac: Maria Alaha.

Last remark: The arabic word Allah, used also by Arabic Christians, is no more no less related to the Aramaic Alaha than to the Hebrew Elohim. The three share a common linguistic root, which is nothing exceptional, so no point being dragged on sterile arguments concerning this point.

« on: May 31, 2018, 06:07:22 AM »

Followup video on my channel so any EoT lover reading this cant make excuses

There you have it, this guy is dishonest,now the next post Ill make ever(since I rarely make posts anymore) will not be about EoT but most possibly about Christianity or Atheism.

(Video below has all of the removed images.  Osama)

The Article I listed from the Mirror has been replaced with this one

Since That article I did read it but I didnt find the evidence as I did in this article.

 (I tried to reply to Essence of Thought with this comment but I got an error and only half this comment was posted,waiting for a reply back from him)
As for right hand posseses, You're literally making the same repeated BS again

Do you anti-Islam advocators not bring anything new?

As for right hand possesses you must know the context behind it

Who abstain from sex, - except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (in their case) they are free from blame, ( Al Quran #23:5, 23:6)

“But those whose desires exceed those limits are transgressors;” - ( Al Quran #23:7 )

It is saying that you must Marry what your right hands possess, then you can have sex with them, and this is completely fine since even the the treatment we're supposed to give them before marrying them is DONOT force your women into sex
"Musaykah, a slave-girl of some Ansari, came and said: My master forces me to commit fornication. Thereupon the following verse was revealed: "But force not your maids to prostitution (when they desire chastity). (24:33)"  (Translation of Sunan Abu Dawud, Divorce (Kitab Al-Talaq), Book 12, Number 2304)"

So that disproves your point of that promoting Rape, now keep repeating your claims. I've watched your other video too,its just emotional drivel.

And you listed 4:23 THAT IS SPEAKING ABOUT FORBIDDING OF INCEST, It has nothing ZERO to do with Rape at all,
You literally probably went to some anti Islamic site and copy pasted all of this,
You literally shot yourself in the foot by mentioning that verse
'O you who have believed, indeed, intoxicants, gambling, [sacrificing on] stone alters [to other than Allah ], and divining arrows are but defilement from the work of Satan, so avoid it that you may be successful.'

Quran 2:219
Again shoots you in the foot Islam doesnt play a part in Grooming gangs nor do they use it for it The grooming gangs literally intoxicate the woman yet in Islam you're not even allowed to sell wine,its prohibited

'They ask you about wine and gambling. Say, "In them is great sin and [yet, some] benefit for people. But their sin is greater than their benefit." And they ask you what they should spend. Say, "The excess [beyond needs]." Thus Allah makes clear to you the verses [of revelation] that you might give thought.'

And even the hadith you mentioned shoots you in the foot

'Narrated Anas bin Malik:

"The Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) cursed ten involved in wine: The one who presses it, the one who has it pressed, its drinker, its carrier, and the one it is carried to, its server, its seller, the consumption of its price, the one who purchases it and the one it was purchased for."

[Abu 'Eisa said:] This Hadith is Gharib as a narration of Anas. Similar to this has been reported from Ibn 'Abbas, Ibn Mas'ud, and Ibn 'Umar, from the Prophet (Peace be upon him).'

And as for the hadiths you mentioned same claims over and over,Aisha R.A,etc,etc you must know Aisha R.A was NOT raped, her father gave her away to the Prophet SAW and I already replied to you on that,

And since you mentioned 5:38 as a verse, you're literally grasping for straws here, NONE OF THE VERSE has ANY little thing to do with Islams stance on rape, infact nothing at all.,

and as for you blaming Hamza for putting his religion forward, if you understood the context of the video he made, you'd realize it was a response to a vile and anti-Muslim Man called Tommy Robinson, who was using it as a argument for Islam, if he didnt put his religion forward, do you think it'll be fair? people can then say Islam endorses rape,etc because Hamza didnt reply with his religion.

Anyways moving on,
You mentioned Syria,etc,etc do you know whos causing the rape there? you have no degree in Islamic studies, you have not even a clue of what the interpretation of each passage is, you know nothing about Middle east, you're like a pawn Muslims will easily intellectually demolish, lets go to Syria and Iraq,etc and Middle eastern countries, whos going for 'sex tourisms' there to Middle east in Syria and Iraq,etc I wonder? WHITE MALES

And now what else do you want to claim if its mostly Muslims? They're also Pakistanis, how come Pakistanis arent blamed for it? Ethnicity? I disagree It feels like you are trying to push an Agenda forward,

But since you carry on blaming our Prophet SAW on the Issue of Aisha and consider that 'Proof' Let me refute that,
Okay now, this was a normal thing in the medieval world since people lived a short life and died earlier and hit puberty earlier
Now if you want to apply 21st century standards to the 7th century, that would be fallacious since then you'd be calling everyone from that time a rapist,

Now the Question is did Sayyida Aisha R.A hit puberty?
Yes,yes she did,
Narrated AISHA: (the wife of the Prophet) I had seen my parents following Islam since I attained the age of PUBERTY. Not a day passed but the Prophet visited us, both in the mornings and evenings.” (Sahih al-Bukhari volume 1, Book 8, Hadith 465

Was she raped or forced into sex at all?
No,no she wasnt
 lets see what french philosopher Montesquieu in his book "The Spirit of the Laws" which became later one of the foundations of the US law says in that book:
"Women are marriageable in hot climates at eight, nine, and ten years of age. thus, childhood and marriage almost always go together there. They are old at twenty: thus reason in women is never found with beauty there"

And as for rape there is no proof, the Family of Aisha R,A agreed to have to have her married
Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234:

Narrated Aisha:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age."

Notice how no Woman had any problem with Aisha R.A

if you still want to ramble on about Pedophilia, know that Pedophilia is only being attracted to children,as for our prophet SAW all of his wives were even older than him, his first wife was 40 and our Prophet SAW was 25
Safiur-Rahman al-Mubarakpuri’s biography:

Khadijah Bint Khuwailid:

In Makkah — prior to Hijra — the Prophet’s household comprised him [pbuh] and his wife Khadijah bint Khuwailid. He was twenty-five and she was forty when they got married. She was the first woman he married. She was the only wife he had till she died. He had sons and daughters with her. None of their sons lived long. They all died. Their daughters were Zainab, Ruqaiya, Umm Kulthum and Fatimah.

Zainab was married to her maternal cousin Abu Al-‘As bin Al-Rabi‘ and that was before Al-Hijra. Ruqaiya and Umm Kulthum were both married to ‘Uthman bin ‘Affan successively (i.e. he married one after the death of her sister). Fatimah was married to ‘Ali bin Abi Talib; and that was in the period between Badr and Uhud battles. The sons and daughters that Fatimah and ‘Ali had were Al-Hasan, Al-Husain, Zainab and Umm Kulthum.

It is well-known that the Prophet [pbuh] was exceptionally authorized to have more than four wives for various reasons. The wives he married were thirteen. Nine of them outlived him. Two died in his lifetime: Khadijah and the Mother of the poor (Umm Al-Masakeen).

Now tell me if the Prophet SAW woukd have been a pedophile he would've always preyed after girls who hadnt hit puberty,yet all his wives did cross puberty including Aisha R.A according to the hadith and why did the Prophet SAW wait 3 years for Aisha RA, Pedophiles and rapists are impatient and forceful but our Prophet SAW wasnt, and he waited for over 3 years so she could hit puberty,which disproves your point of our Prophet SAW being anything you claim him to be

So theres your whole bogus claim refuted Now I challenge you something, if you claim to know the Quran so well, go study the whole Quran and hadith a bit extensively, orelse you'll make another crap video with misleading footnotes.
theres your whole claim refuted.'

And as for all your responses to Hamza, The girls do know the predators,etc,etc but you did not get his point at all, what he's trying to say is that cut it right in the start, as soon as you see the girl acting strangely or with a strange man, try to step in,find out whats going on, and as for grooming gangs, they rape CHILDREN, they dont go after adult women, they're PEDOPHILES, they are the special type of scum and subhuman, so if you want to really know what is Hamza saying instead of misrepresenting him since you're an anti-islam advocate, thats your job, to misrepresent all what Muslims say, actually take the time to understand and watch his video and what he is saying,

And as for Basis and evidence of what Hamza says, here is a article

Now he did have a basis for it, and he responded in the Manner that should be responded in, against that said culture, all he said, was that most of these victim are children, and its due to their families neglecting them, and that study supports this,busted again.

« on: April 26, 2018, 11:23:15 PM »
So theres this quarell that happened around a week ago between Br Hamza and Essence Of Though

Now while watching through this 3 things really pissed me off in essence of thoughts video about Hamza Myatt,
1)Rape victim card
2)Rape profiteering claim
3)Claim that Hamza puts his religion more than Rape victims,
4)Victim blaming
Now thing is

HOW THE ACTUAL HELL CAN HE CLAIM HAMZA IS RAPE PROFITEERING WHEN HE CLAIMS TO BE A RAPE VICTIM WITH NO EVIDENCE AND GAINING MONEY OFF OF THAT, That is rape profiteering! You're promoting your own self and some false childhood rape claim about yourself and getting people to donate you over it, is that NOT rape profiteering?! This really pissed me off, if someone was a rape victim noticing this, you can imagine how stressful he'd feel about this

As for Hamza I dont think Hamza is rape profiteering,Hamza didnt claim to be a rape victim,he spoke against rape, by the logic of Essence of Thought, we can say Psychiatrists who help rape victims are Rape profiteers since they get money and donations from that, its like saying Policemen who get money for warning and protecting against rape are rape profiteers, Hamza made it clear if anyone knows or finds out a person in such a acts,report him to the police immediatly in the video and he never begged for money in the video at all.

As for the last claim, the whole context of the video is purposefully removed and never shown I wonder why huh? the video clearly shows this is a response to Tommy robinson and his group saying Islam is supposed to promote rape gangs,
If Hamza didnt put his religion forward he wouldve failed to make a argument and done a strawman, and thats why he had to give the religions view, indirectly if you notice EoT is making an Islamophobic claim that hes lying about the Muslim stance even though what Hamza said has proof in the Islamic sources, so really EoT is trying to hide the video since he knows how much of a liar he is.

As for Victim blaming this one made me question such an individuals existence.
How can ANYONE TAKE this argument seriously after watching Hamzas video, in Hamzas video the idea is that

These Victims became vulnerable due to neglect by society, now is Hamza saying NO IT IS THE VICTIMS FAULT FOR BEING VULNERABLE, no Hamza is saying that noone cares that these vulnerable little girls are being completely neglected by their families and hence they tend to look for love, which is a natural feeling, Hamza himself said we cant blame them for that, but thing is, noone questions the fact  a young girl is drinking out with an old Man, and this is a fact, its true noone questions some teenager at the bar in the middle of the night, so who is it to blame? ISLAM? No, The victim? No, The western culture? Yes, since its due to the western culture such an idea is promoted that once the child is a teenager he has to be neglected and left alone.

This is the reason they become vulnerable due to this culture, and it shouldnt be this way,their parents are to blame for neglecting them

« on: April 12, 2018, 11:32:52 AM »
2.) Philosophy of Science states that Scientific discoveries may change over time

as for evolution it went through a Unknown process and jumped from Ibn Khalduns theory to Darwinian evolution

It has assumptions

It has disputes(Neo Lamarckian evolution,and all that innit)

And its probablistic, its based on Limited data and what we know, its not based on observable evidence

the only evidence we did have was fossils and the dating is faulty because they keep finding newer homo sapien skulls and have to redate everything in the Fossils. so we're not even sure if the fossils are what we think they are because they may not be evolutionary fossils at all,since thats an assumption they make without proving it

And no Similar DNA doesnt prove it,we need to have the same DNA if we did go through such evolutions.

1.) No God doesnt need others, why would God need others? unless if you're comparing God to the Hindu Gods, which means you're doing shirk.
You see God is not like humans, he doesnt have a 'resting point' like us nor does he get tired, if he wants he can create infinite Universes, if he wants he can make Humans into Dogs. that is Gods will.

2.)Because Life is a test, if God made them all know the test, they all would've come to Islam and theres no point of having a test anymore, since there wont be atheists,etc the world has been modernized now theres internet,etc Ignorance is only a choice now. and remember, the Quran is not for everyone, the Quran says it is for those who contemplate. and infact the beggar will have his own seperate test in Qiyamah if he didnt know the test, as I showed in answer 3 in my last post

So no it doesnt falsify Islam at all.

3.)Again, Ignorance is a choice, God has given the Quran out there, if those people know the Quran is there, know that they have to read it, etc but choose not to practice, then that means they're only ignorant.
We already have debaters and Muslim scholars around the world instructing people,teaching people,etc. if these people are too lazy to find the truth, thats their fault.
Infact the standards of truth wary among people, there are different standards of truth,
and many of them can be arrogant standards like the atheist may say Truth is anything that excludes God, so thats why its not fit for us to go around everywhere and ask people for their standards of truth, imagine asking 1 million people for their standard of truth, and most of them with arrogance,

So thats why God made the Quran only for those who contemplate.

5.)This question makes no sense, since the thing is, if God made it clear Islam is the truth, what do you think would happen? everyone would be a Muslim, then the test itself would be falsified and there wont be a test anymore, so no it doesnt sound like a cooked up story.
It is illogical for the teacher to take a test and in the test tell everyone the answers, then the test wont remain, because the teacher already told you the answers and you will write them all down correctly on the paper.

Take this analogy if you will: A Teacher before the tests teaches all her students, the students have the choice to ignore studying and ignore the things she says or to study and follow the things she said.
Now if the student takes the former, he will fail if he takes the later, he will pass.

As for 1, that is a argument ad populum, you donot adhere to the populations opinions to find truth, or that way you may even become a flat earther.

2.The reason is, as the Quran says in 2:252, there is no compulsion in religion
So basically the thing is, even that is a fallacious argumsnr that way I can say since many people think Space exists, but have not gone to space,that means space doesnt exist,
Since there is no compulsion in religion and we were given free will,you see we have the decision to follow Islam or not as the Quran even says, you to your religion me to mine,to the kafir for the third, heres an answer

As for 1.
This has been answered by the following
Anyone who has not received the Da`wah (Invitation to Islaam) in the life of this world and died ignorant of the truth will be tested on the Day of Resurrection, according to the most correct opinion maintained by scholars. If they succeed (by accepting the truth), they will be admitted into Paradise. But if they oppose the truth, they will be cast into Hellfire.

This applies to all people categorized as Ahl-ul-Fatrah who have not received Da`wah.

The proof of this is in the following verse:

17:15 ...And never would We punish until We sent a messenger..


Imaam Ahmad in his Musnad (16301) said:

Allaah's Messenger (sallallaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) said: "Four will have proofs (in their favor) on the Day of Standing: (1) A deaf man who could not hear anything; (2) a fool (who could not understand anything); (3) a feebly old man; and (4) a man who died in the fatrah (the period between prophets). As for the deaf man, then he will say: 'My Lord, Islaam came and I did not hear anything.' And as for the fool, then he will say, 'My Lord, Islaam came and the children were throwing dung at me.' And as for the feebly old man, then he will say, 'My Lord, Islaam came and I did not understand anything.' And as for the one who died in the fatrah (period between prophets), then he will say, 'My Lord, no messenger from you came to me.' So He (Allaah) will take oaths from them that they will obey Him (in what He is about to request from them), so it (an order) will be sent to them: 'Enter the Fire!' And verily by Him in whose Hand is my soul, if they entered it, it will be cool and soothing."

4.You're doing a false comparison here, you're comparing a mother whos careful,etc with Allah SWT our creator whos not in need of us, infact its a mercy he even created us, he does guide, he does give the message,etc but the lost one, its his fault for not coming to the message and ignoring it all the time because of his own desires.

Allah gave you breathe for free,everything for free, so would we not have to repay?

5. No it doesnt actually,dont mean to do an ad hominem but you seem ignorant of Islam I mean these all are simple you're basically saying that God should tske our free will away and make us his mindslaves.

Let me provide some other link with the same data instead, Medscape didnt ask me for anything,

I dont think I ever mentioned anti Gay protests when I linked it,?

The reason i mentioned MRSA is because it is quite abundant within the homosexual and LGBT community,

And no I do think that it can be fixed if researchee but LGBT doesnt let anyone research that you know? When those protests are held when a investigation is labelled anti-gay?

Anyone can get MRSA on their body from contact with an infected wound or by sharing personal items, such as towels or razors, that have touched infected skin. MRSA infection risk can be increased when a person is in activities or places that involve crowding, skin-to-skin contact, and shared equipment or supplies"
General Information | MRSA | CDC › mrsa › community

And No,by Influence I dont mean sex

And those genetic disorders can be fixed by genetic engineering,rather than that, they choose to dress up,act and engage in sexual activity wwith the same gender until they get a gender change surgery?

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 ... 42