Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 10
1
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Recent attack on Quran
« Last post by AMuslimDude213 on November 16, 2019, 10:00:40 PM »
Honestly theres no proof against this, They are judging the Quran with their own biblical view which in itself is a fallacious reasoning, It is a circular reasoning fallacy Because they have no evidence for their authenticity of the Bible's claims.
2
Quran Morality and Moral Code, Laws & QA / Re: QURA'N AND SLAVERY :
« Last post by Shabeer1 on November 16, 2019, 11:19:58 AM »
Thanks  bro  for the  additional  information 
3
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Recent attack on Quran
« Last post by QuranSearchCom on November 16, 2019, 09:09:38 AM »
Wa Alaikum As'salam,

What's to refute?  Whether his parents went to Egypt or not (there is no proof that they've never been there), if Allah Almighty said it in the Glorious Quran, then this means that they were inspired to say it.

I trust the Glorious Quran.  It is the only True Divine Book of Allah Almighty on earth today.  All else are corrupt.  The Glorious Quran is filled with scientific, numerical, historical and archeological miracles:

www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#links

So I'd take the Holy Quran's account over anything else.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah
4
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Recent attack on Quran
« Last post by Isa27James on November 16, 2019, 07:07:23 AM »
Assalam Alykam

I recently returned back to debating hostile Christians
And they attack Sūrah Yūsuf verse 99

And when they entered upon Joseph, he took his parents to himself and said, "Enter Egypt, Allah willing, safe [and secure]."


They say his parents never came to Egypt and died before hand?

Any refutation to this ?
5
As'salamu Alaikum dear brother Dawud and Idris,

Jazakum Allah Khayr for your research.

Brother Dawud, I have saved and uploaded your images to the website and re-linked them in your post to permanently preserve them with this website, insha'Allah.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah
6

Wa aleikum as-salam wa rahmatullahi wa baraketuh,

I apologize for my late response! Yes, I will get to this discussion insha'Allah but from what I see, our brother Ijaz Ahmad either didn't understood well my research or he simply didn't read it entirely and/or didn't took into account all of the information related e.g. to the issue concerning the so-called "iotacism" which was a problematic one among the Septuagint experts themselves (like Alfred Rahlfs). According to traditional Islamic stories about prophets, it appears that this illiterate from Isaiah 29:12 was ORIGINALLY identified as "Ahmad" and he was connected directly with the character universally known as the "Servant of God" who is described in Isaiah 42 (Ibn Asakir recorded one naration from Ka'b al-Ahbar who found the name Ahmad being ascribed to this servant... in some Yemeni or probably Syriac version of Isaiah that available to him at that time). Besides that, there is a lot of other details which consequently lead in this direction supporting my argument about Ahmad who was originally mentioned in Isaiah as the ultimate redemptive figure but the last editors of the Hebrew Bible restructured the text and changed the whole prophetic narratives in favor of Israel (so they put Jacob/Israel insted of Ahmad!).

Anyway, perhaps the real reason Brother Idjaz Ahmad opposes my research is because he don't believe at all that Isaiah 29:12 is a prophecy about Prophet Mohammed (SAAW) because of the negative context in which the illiterate is put and because no early Muslim scholar ever has quoted the text of Isaiah 29:12 with respect to Prophet Mohammed (SAAW). The first one who started this argumentation was probably Ahmad Deedat.

I will try to enter the discussion in FB as soon as possible insha'Allah.


name Ahmad or Ahmod is found in Isaiah in dead sea scrolls, look here


(click to enlarge)



hebrew bible


(click to enlarge)



Word Ahmad in bible

אחמד Ahmad

Bible in hebrew Isaiah 42
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt1042.htm

DSS orginal manuscripts
http://dss.collections.imj.org.il/isaiah#42:1

freetranslation
https://www.freetranslation.com/


and i made this phtoo also, beacuse we need to compare word HIra with other words which corrector Cb3 tried to connect with, when you compare these obviosly it looks like he tried to correct it to match word Heiras


(click to enlarge)
7
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Exorcism of the Syrophoenician
« Last post by QuranSearchCom on November 12, 2019, 05:02:20 AM »
No issues at all, dear brother Shaad :).  Jazaka Allah Khayr.  You are welcome.
8
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Exorcism of the Syrophoenician
« Last post by shaad on November 11, 2019, 10:05:08 PM »
Sorry was offline...thank you brother Osama
9

Wa aleikum as-salam wa rahmatullahi wa baraketuh,

I apologize for my late response! Yes, I will get to this discussion insha'Allah but from what I see, our brother Ijaz Ahmad either didn't understood well my research or he simply didn't read it entirely and/or didn't took into account all of the information related e.g. to the issue concerning the so-called "iotacism" which was a problematic one among the Septuagint experts themselves (like Alfred Rahlfs). According to traditional Islamic stories about prophets, it appears that this illiterate from Isaiah 29:12 was ORIGINALLY identified as "Ahmad" and he was connected directly with the character universally known as the "Servant of God" who is described in Isaiah 42 (Ibn Asakir recorded one naration from Ka'b al-Ahbar who found the name Ahmad being ascribed to this servant... in some Yemeni or probably Syriac version of Isaiah that available to him at that time). Besides that, there is a lot of other details which consequently lead in this direction supporting my argument about Ahmad who was originally mentioned in Isaiah as the ultimate redemptive figure but the last editors of the Hebrew Bible restructured the text and changed the whole prophetic narratives in favor of Israel (so they put Jacob/Israel insted of Ahmad!).

Anyway, perhaps the real reason Brother Idjaz Ahmad opposes my research is because he don't believe at all that Isaiah 29:12 is a prophecy about Prophet Mohammed (SAAW) because of the negative context in which the illiterate is put and because no early Muslim scholar ever has quoted the text of Isaiah 29:12 with respect to Prophet Mohammed (SAAW). The first one who started this argumentation was probably Ahmad Deedat.

I will try to enter the discussion in FB as soon as possible insha'Allah.
10


No problem akhi. I have sent you my latest update to the section Evidence #1. This time I have added few articles and books written by scholars that confirms the spelling of Hira in its Greek transliterated form Χιρά. A very important info!

Did you actually opened the last file with my updates to Evidence #1 ?

Salam brother , i started a topic about this on FB and this brother Ijaz Ahamad, who is a debator with christians, tried to disprove your fiding, what can you say, can you get into the discussion on facebook with this brother if you have better argument than i have



our discussion on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/130763117665481/596541127754342/?comment_id=597107107697744&reply_comment_id=597152174359904&notif_id=1572896796394919&notif_t=group_comment_mention
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 10