Conspiracies and Blasphemies in
the Hadiths Collections:
Science of the Hadiths. Also, the Hadith of the fly
discussed here. Also visit:
Also, regarding the Hadiths
scientific errors that exist in some of them, we do not
believe all Hadiths are from the Prophet, peace be upon him, for the
They were documented 300 years after the Prophet.
The Muslims never documented them on a large scale. Only the
Glorious Quran was thoroughly documented and compiled during
Uthman's times and before.
Many Hadiths are paraphrases of what the transmitters from other
transmitters from other transmitters said. All hadiths today begin
with a long chain of narrators covering a vast period of time
between the narrator and the Prophet. So they're not all accurate.
Which Hadiths are True, and which
are false fabrications on the mount of the Prophet and his
Did Prophet Muhammad
suck the penis of his grandson Hasan?
This story was proven to be a fabricated lie that was inserted from
to the "The
section below in this table.
As'salamu Alaikum dear brothers,
Much of these stories are false, even when they favor the
Prophet, peace be upon him. Did you know that Bukhara (the town
that Sheikh Al-Bukhari came from)
had big Jewish migrations
from and to it? You can Google-research it here:
So it is quite possible and feasible that many Jews pretended to
embrace Islam to poison it.
Imam Bukhari could be
another rotten one of them.
And even if he wasn't, still the ones that were close to him
from his Jewish students were.
Let me make this much simpler for all Muslims to understand. So
while in Sahih Bukhari you find all of the beautiful Hadiths
that agree with the Glorious Quran and Its amazing Moral Code:
But you still find the rotten lies about:
1- The Prophet being bewitched and influenced by magic, despite
the fact that the Glorious Quran denies it.
2- Aisha used to suckle adult males so she would be alone with
3- She-monkey got stoned by other monkeys for committing
4- Prophet Moses, peace be upon him, punching the Angel of
Death in the eye when Allah Almighty sent him to take Moses'
soul. This is a direct blasphemy and
violation to Allah Almighty's
"The disbeliever has half of the believer's
الكافر نصف عقل المؤمن" (Source).
A talking cow:
Sahih Bukhari, Hadith no: 522
Narrated / Authority of: Abu Huraira
The Prophet (SAW) said, "While a man
was riding a cow, it
turned towards him and said, 'I have not been created for
this purpose (i.e. carrying), I have been created for
sloughing." The Prophet (SAW) added, "I, Abu Bakr and 'Umar
believe in the story." The Prophet (SAW) went on, "A wolf caught
a sheep, and when the shepherd chased it, the wolf said, 'Who
will be its guard on the day of wild beasts, when there will be
no shepherd for it except me?' "After narrating it, the Prophet
(SAW) said, "I, Abu Bakr and 'Umar too believe it." Abu Salama
(a sub-narrator) said, "Abu Bakr and 'Umar were not present
6- And on and on and on....
Like I said before: They couldn't penetrate the Glorious Quran
and corrupt it. So instead, they invented these
Abu Khara books
and put them on the same level as the Quran to poison Islam. To
see the Glorious Quran's Overwhelming Scientific Miracles,
- This is
why only the things that DO NOT CLASH with the Glorious Quran
and Its Morality are closest to the Truth. Otherwise, they
belong to the garbage. This is why Allah Almighty called the
Book that has all Authority above all other books and laws).
Also visit these
rebuttals on my blog:
As'salamu Alaikum dear
brother Farhan Uddin,
Let's look at the
Hadith that you mentioned:
"Abu Harb b. Abu al-Aswad
reported on the authority of his father that Abu Musa al-Ash'ari
sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three
hundred in number. They recited the Qur'an and he said: You are the
best among the inhabitants of Basra, for you are the reciters among
them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your
reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened
the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which
resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara'at.
I have, however, forgotten it with the exception
of this which I remember out of it:" If there were two valleys full
of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley,
and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust."
And we used so recite a slirah which resembled one of the surahs of
Musabbihat, and I have forgotten it, but remember (this much) out of
it:" Oh people who believe, why do you say that which you do not
practise" (lxi 2.) and" that is recorded in your necks as a witness
(against you) and you would be asked about it on the Day of
Resurrection" (xvii. 13)."
(Sahih Muslim, Book 5:
The Book of Zakat (Kitab Al-Zakat), Book 005, Number 2286)
The answer is very simple:
1- The doubt happened in Iraq, not in Madina or Mecca.
2- Why go to a doubtful source, when you have the primary source?
3- The Holy Quran was written and compiled on the spot during
Prophet Muhammad's days, peace be upon him.
4- Memorizing the Holy Quran was something the Muslims big on,
because it was from Allah Almighty, and also because they needed to
read the Holy Book in their daily Prayers.
5- The Holy Quran was perfectly preserved in Mecc and Madina.
6- The noise that you hear is from places that were many 100s of
miles away, on foot.
7- And who told you that these Hadiths are reliable? I am one
Muslim that believes that there are consipracies done in the Bukhari
and Muslim and other Hadith collections. Yes, they contain Truth in
them. But they also contain what clearly appears to be deliberate
poisons in there to poison the believers' faith. Example of this:
A person was walking down, and saw monkies stonning to
death an adulterous she-monkey?? (Source).
Do animals even have these types of rituals and intelligence among
And what's even funnier is that the narrator (the guy) says that he
started stonning the she-monkey with them (Source).
I mean this is as if he is deliberately spitting in the face of the
reader, and the reader's intelligence! It is as if there is a
hidden message to the Muslim reader that says:
"Hey stupid! This
is in your so-called most authentic hadiths collections."
Why does such garbage exist in the Sahih Bukhari and Muslim and
other Hadith collections?
Two simple missing "verses" caused so much noise:
Another example of the poisons injected in the Sahih Hadiths
literature is this:
1- The so-called missing stonning (rajm) Verse (Ayah).
2- The so-called ADULTS ALLOWED TO SUCK breasts and become foster
children to any female verse (ayah).
I ask you in the Holy Name of GOD Almighty, could not any living
person in Mecca and Madina even
memorize the texts
of these two small and simple verses?? We're not
talking BOOKS MISSING HERE. We're talking about two simple short
verses that we don't even have their texts??
No mention of foster daughters!
Another proof that the topic of breast feeding adults is a lie from
Hell is the fact that you never read or hear about commands ordering
WOMEN to become FOSTER CHILDREN. Can a woman suck on another
woman's breast to become her foster daughter? Does she not need to
become the foster sister of the sons? It's always about a
grown man sucking on an adult woman. Islam's Laws always cover both
sides. But you never see this lie covering both sides. And most
certainly, RIDAA' (breast feeding) of babies in the Glorious Quran
is about both male and female babies.
The breast feeding is
only allowed during the first 2 YEARS of the child's life.
Even a child that is THREE YEARS OLD IS NOT ALLOWED TO be BREAST
FED! Let alone a grown man. And no man
becomes a foster child by sucking on a woman's breast! And not
every woman is wet (has milk) anyway. Most women on earth are dry.
Women become wet only to feed their babies. The period is very
limited when compared to their lifetime.
The term RIDAA' (BREAST
FEEDING) of adults is
scientifically and morally. My old mother could
not give RIDAA' to any man or baby. She is dry. And to suggest
that all she needs to do is to have a man suck on her breast to
become her foster child is a
lie from Hell invented on Islam!!
The story of Salim in the hadiths is a lie. The hadith is not
Mutawatir and is in direct contradiction and violation of the Holy
Quran. This is why RIDAA' in the Quran is only by mothers or foster
mothers, to be hired if the mother becomes dry, for babies no older
than 2 years old. It is detailed in the Quran. It is for feeding
and nourishing the baby. Even if an adult drinks some of the milk,
it doesn't make him foster child either. He is older than 2 years
old. And this should be punishable by flogging if his mouth
contacts the breast, because it now would enter immorality sinning.
Doing sexual acts between a man and a woman, or between homosexuals,
is punishable in Islam. A man sucking on a woman's breast is that
kind of crime.
Clearly this is nothing but poison of lies injected in the Sahih
Hadiths volumes. It's a conspiracy against Islam from within!
Again, spitting in the face and intelligence of the reader!
What's equally ridiculous to this is
that in Egypt and Saudi Arabia they had huge debates about whether a
grown up man can suck a woman's breasts and become her foster
child. Yet, in the Holy Quran, sucking the breasts is only for the
first two years of the child's life. So even a small kid is not
allowed to suck his mother's breasts; let alone a grown up man like
ME sucking a a woman's breasts:
mothers shall give suck to their offspring for two whole years,
if the father desires to complete the term....
(The Noble Quran,
Would not the drawn attention have caused for the
"verses" to be memorized and documented?
We are taught in our Islamic Hadiths literature that Caliph Omar
said the following to the Muslims:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
'Umar said, "I am
afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, "We
do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy
Book," and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation
that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty
of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse,
if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or
pregnancy or confession." Sufyan added, "I have memorized this
narration in this way." 'Umar added, "Surely Allah's Apostle carried
out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him."
Bukhari, Book 82: Punishment of Disbelievers at War with Allah and
His Apostle, Volume 8, Book 82, Number 816)
And regarding the verses about the suckling of adults:
عن عائشة قالت لقد نزلت
آية الرجم ورضاعة الكبير عشرا ولقد كان في صحيفة تحت سريري فلما مات
رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وتشاغلنا بموته دخل داجن فأكلها
Reported 'Aisha (RA):
â€˜the verse of stoning and of suckling an adult ten times was
revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my
pillow. When the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) expired and we were
occupied by his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper.â€™
Ibn Majah, Hadith 1944)
Question: Since supposedly so much light was shed
upon these two topics by Omar and Aisha, and so much attention was
drawn to them, how come then no one was able to come up with their
texts?? Today, we do not have the actual texts of those alleged
"verses". All we have are empty claims in the poisoned books!
Doesn't this prove that these alleged conversations by Omar and
Aisha, may Allah Almighty be pleased with them, - in the narrations
above, - never
actually took place? In other words, they are lies
on the mouths of Omar and Aisha, just like that lie above about the
stoning of the
This should further demonstrate that there are injected lies and
conspiracies in our Hadiths collections. Now, this doesn't mean
that we should reject the Hadiths by the wholesale. No.
I am not a Qurani or
Quran-Only Muslim. In fact, I exposed this false
on the this website. But false hadiths above clearly
demonstrate that there are conspiracies, from within, against
Islam. You couldn't possibly be a sane person, and at the same time
accept the stoning of the she-monkey Hadith! Yet, it's in our
strongest and supposedly most authentic Hadiths collections.
The same goes with the suckling for adults and the stoning alleged
"verses". With all of the supposed drawn attention to them, it
should've been very easy for Muslim to write them down. After all,
1- Did they not come down for all Muslims?
2- Were they not memorized by many Muslims?
3- Were they not written down by other Muslims?
The Prophet got bewitched through a piece of his
Here is another example that further demonstrates the clear
conspiracy and poisons of lies that were deliberately injected into
our Hadiths literature, from within. Consider the following absurd
"That Allah's Apostle
was affected by magic, so much that he used to think that he had
done something which in fact, he did not do, and he invoked his Lord
(for a remedy). Then (one day) he said, "O 'Aisha!) Do you know that
Allah has advised me as to the problem I consulted Him about?"
'Aisha said, "O Allah's Apostle! What's that?" He said, "Two men
came to me and one of them sat at my head and the other at my feet,
and one of them asked his companion, 'What is wrong with this man?'
The latter replied, 'He is under the effect of magic.' The former
asked, 'Who has worked magic on him?' The latter replied, 'Labid bin
Al-A'sam (a Jew).' The former asked, 'With what did he work the
magic?' The latter replied, 'With a comb
and the hair, which are stuck to the comb, and the skin of
pollen of a date-palm tree.' The former asked, 'Where is that?' The
latter replied, 'It is in Dharwan.' Dharwan was a well in the
dwelling place of the (tribe of) Bani Zuraiq. Allah's
Apostle went to that well and returned to 'Aisha, saying, 'By Allah,
the water (of the well) was as red as the infusion of Hinna, (1) and
the date-palm trees look like the heads of devils.' 'Aisha added,
Allah's Apostle came to me and informed me about the well. I asked
the Prophet, 'O Allah's Apostle, why didn't you take out the skin of
pollen?' He said, 'As for me, Allah has cured me and I hated to draw
the attention of the people to such evil (which they might learn and
harm others with).'
Narrated Hisham's father: 'Aisha said, "Allah's Apostle was
bewitched, so he invoked Allah repeatedly requesting Him to cure him
from that magic)." Hisham then narrated the above narration. (See
Hadith No. 658, Vol. 7)""
Bukhari, Book 75: Invocations, Volume 8, Book 75, Number 400)
So a Jew steals a piece of the Prophet's hair,
says abakadabra on
it, and the Prophet gets betwiched??
Why can't this be a Jew-hating lie that was invented by liars who
fabricated this entire story for propaganda? Now, you all know how
vicious I am against zionism on this website. But I am not against
innocent Jews or any innocent person, in general. This false story
just doesn't make any sense, and it is quite absurd! Not only that,
but it clashes head-on with the Holy Quran:
know best why it is they listen, when they listen to thee; and when
they meet in private conference, behold,
the wicked say, "Ye follow none other than a man
(Why) has not a treasure been bestowed on him, or why has he (not) a
garden for enjoyment?"
say: "Ye follow none other than a man bewitched."
So if Prophet Muhammad was betwiched, then the Quran has failed in
Noble Verses 17:47 and
25:8! Furthermore, how could the people who made the claim
be then "wicked",
if their claim was true?
Think about it. If you have a video recording of Osama Abdallah
(me) committing adultery with a woman, and you decide to expose me
on it, because you just got sick and tired of my lies and
hypocrisy. How on EARTH would that make you wicked?? If the
Prophet was indeed bewitched, then how could saying that he is
indeed bewitched make one wicked??
Other related Noble Verses about
Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him:
Your Companion is
neither astray nor being misled.
(Oh people)! your companion
is not crazy.
Say, `I only exhort you to do only one thing: that you stand up
before ALLAH in twos and singly and reflect. You will then realize
that there is no
insanity in your companion; he is only a Warner to
you of an impending severe punishment.'
We do know that their remarks cause you grief. But it is not just
you they are calling a
liar. Rather, these evildoers have actually rejected
the revelations of Allah.
And if they call you a
liar, then say, “Your Lord is limitless in His Mercy!
His punishment against the guilty people shall not be set aside!”
So now all Muslims are wicked??
Think about it. This makes every Muslim, who believes that the
Prophet was indeed bewitched, a wicked person! If
you believe in those Hadiths, then you have become a wicked person
according to Noble
Verses 17:47 and 25:8!
Did Prophet Muhammad ascend
alykam did Jews really used to pray 50times a day? Jews
before Islam used to pray 3 times a day where did the 50 prayers
used to be offerd? in Musa's time? or did the Jews never used
to pray 50 is it just an example of how much reward we get?"
Wa Alaikum As'salam dear
Quite honestly, this story (the Prophet ascended to Heaven from
Jerusalem) isn't supported in the Glorious Quran. Therefore, it
could be a made up lie. So:
Either the story is true and the original Judaism used to have the
order of 50 Prayers per day but was lost today. The Bible is
corrupt and is not original according to is own theologians:
www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm (what parts of
the Bible and Hadiths do Muslims believe in)
The story is a made up lie that was injected into Islam through
gossips. The Sahih Hadith books were written down 300 years after
the Prophet. Before that, there were fragments and writings of
Hadiths here and there, and much of the Hadiths were passed down
The Muslims spent much of their human resources in documenting the Glorious
Quran, not the Hadiths. Visit the links above.
I hope this helps, Insha'Allah.
U dont believe in isra and miraj"
As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,
I do believe in the Isra from the Al-Masjid Al-Haram
in Mecca to Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa in Jerusalem (or al-Quds in Arabic).
Allah Almighty Said:
is He who took His Servant by night from
al-Masjid al-Haram to al-Masjid al-Aqsa, whose
surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He
is the Hearing, the Seeing.
No mention of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him,
ascending to Heaven from Jerusalem. It is possible that the event
happened. But it is also not the end of the world if it gets
rejected since it is not mentioned in the Glorious Quran. If
Muslims learn to be this flexible with each others,
then our Ummah would be far better off. But instead, they
apostatize each others and fight each others over differences in
hadith-narrations. To me, if the Hadith isn't directly supported in
the Glorious Quran, then there are the following possibilities for
1- It is part of a bigger event mentioned in the
Glorious Quran. Ex: This story here of Isra and Miraj, the dajjal
during the return of Christ, the
daily Sunnah Prayers of
the Prophet, which we know are 100% True, because we have inherited
them from generation to generation from the start of Islam.
2- Or it is a forgery.
There is not enough evidence to reject the story
But however, this doesn't mean that we must accept ALL OF THE
NARRATIONS that are related to it either. This is the danger of
putting the man-made books on the same level as the Pure and Holy
Quran. Narrations in the sahih hadith books can be either not
accurate or complete forgeries. After all, all of the Hadiths are
paraphrases (not exact quotations). No Hadith was perfectly written
down as the Holy Quran was written down and preserved. Only the
Holy Quran is perfectly preserved and Miraculous. The very complex
Text of the Glorious Quran testifies to the Mighty Miracle of our
Holy Book in both Textual Miracle and also Numerical Miracle in the
values of the Holy Book's Letters. Visit the following links:
(on the Quran's Perfect Preservation, and also stunning Prophecies)
(on the Quran's Overwhelming Scientific Miracles)
The Bottom Line:
Here is the bottom line: What agrees with the Holy
Quran from the hadiths and also from the Bible and other scriptures
is closest to the Truth, but not absolute Truth like the Holy Quran.
And what disagrees with the Holy Quran, and the Standards of the
Holy Quran, and the Moral Code of the Holy Quran, and the
Fitrah Human Instinct
that Allah Almighty has injected into us as humans from the time of
our birth, - what disagrees with this natural GOD-given human
instinct, - belongs to the
Did not Prophet Muhammad say
that all humans are born with the
Fitrah of Islam:
We're all born Muslims and
with the natural human instinct of Islam that Allah Almighty has put
in us. It is our man-made falsehoods that make us deviate from
this pure Fitrah.
And last and not least, please visit the following link to see the
Overwhelming Scientific Miracles of the
Also, Prophet Muhammad and Islamthoroughly prophesied, even by the
name, in the Bible, Dead Sea Scrolls, and other previous Scriptures:
Where is the proof for my statement above?
I was asked before how can I substantiate the following statement
from the Holy Quran:
is the bottom line: What agrees with the Holy Quran
from the hadiths and also from the Bible and other scriptures is
closest to the Truth, but not absolute Truth like the Holy
Quran. And what disagrees with the Holy Quran belongs to the
Here is the proof from the Holy Quran:
(We sent them) with
Clear Signs and Books of dark prophecies; and We have sent down unto
thee (also) the Message;
that thou mayest explain clearly to men
what is sent for them, and that they may
After the guidance has been revealed and
explained, if anyone parts his way with the
messenger and follows a path different from that of the believers,
then We will divert him along his (chosen) path. We will hurl him in
the hell (in the hereafter). What a despicable destination!
Say, “Have you (ever)
considered? What if Allah took away your hearing and your sight, and
sealed off your heart? Is there a god besides Allah, who could give
you back these senses?” Observe, how
We explain the revelations in detail. Yet, they
turn away (disdainfully).
In this manner,
We explain Our revelations in detail,
so that the ways of the criminals would become (widely known and)
Allah Almighty also called the
"Has all Authority above all",
or "the dominant Book with the Highest
Noble Verse 5:48.
For ample more on this point, please visit:
So the real genuine Hadiths that are Quran-Approved are the ones
that directly explain and detail the Holy Quran's Commands. Not
every word that came out of the Prophet's mouth is a legitimate
Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari:
Prophet used to invoke Allah, saying, "Allahumma ighfirli khati'ati
wa jahli wa israfi fi amri, wa ma anta a-'lamu bihi minni. Allahumma
ighfirli hazali wa jiddi wa khata'i wa amdi, wa kullu dhalika 'indi"
WHICH READS IN ENGLISH AS:
"O Allah! Forgive my mistakes and my ignorance and my exceeding the
limit (boundaries) of righteousness in my deeds; and forgive
whatever You know better than I. O Allah! Forgive the wrong
I have done jokingly or
and forgive my accidental and intentional errors, all that is
present in me."
Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 75, Number 408))
This is why those who say that the Prophet never spoke out of his
own desire, and that every word he spoke was an inspiration are all
in error. The following Noble Verses that they use only refer to
the Holy Quran's Revelations:
You companion has
neither erred, nor has he gone astray,
Nor does he speak out of his own desire.
[053:004] It is nothing
but pure revelation revealed by God.
[053:005] The Lord of
the Mighty Powers has taught him (i.e., Angel Gabriel),
Those who say that Prophet Muhammad was a "Walking
Quran", and that every single word he spoke was an
inspiration are full of rubbish nonsense. Also visit:
Are the Jinns bacteria according to Islam?
And last and not least, to see
the Glorious Quran's True and
Overwhelming Scientific Miracles that testify to the Divinity
of the Holy Book, and proves that the Glorious Quran's Miracle is an
Everlasting One and is contained in the Holy Book, visit:
I hope this helps, insha'Allah.