Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - A proud Muslim

Pages: [1] 2
« on: August 31, 2020, 05:41:49 AM »
Hello, brother Osama. 7 years ago,  you said that you had a bad dream about hell. In case, you don't remember anything about it. Here's the link:

For some reason, I felt that I have to tell you. I guess what you saw means that you were about to enter hell. This has to do with you not accepting the Sunnah as what the scholars do. You also are insulting the salafi people although they are the scholars who wrote all these books we are reading today.

I invite you to a debate about the sunnah and salafism.

Note:Can you let us have a calm discussion without insulting anyone, or making fun of each others' beliefs?

GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Ahad hadiths must be believed.
« on: July 27, 2020, 05:25:30 AM »
As-salamu alaykum, In the name of God the most gracious the most merciful, and all praise is due to God. Many people will say that they stick only to Mutwateer Hadith (Hadith which is narrated by a myriad of people which indicates that it's impossible for them to lie, or to make a mistake). They usually rely on saying that Ahad hadith (Hadith which is inly narrated by one narrator) may be wrong as that one narrator may make a mistake while narrating the hadith, so we shouldn't take the risk, and make our belief on a hadith that may be mistaken.

Well, to begin with, the Mutwateer hadith make a minority of the total numbers of hadiths, which means that if we decide to believe the mutwateer hadith only, then we would end up with getting rid of thousands of hadiths. We would actually get rid of all the hadiths, and leave a small amount of them. Another thing to consider, is the prophet Muhammed  did send one person to teach the non-Muslims Islam.

 وعن معاذٍ  قَالَ: بعَثني رسولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ إِلى اليَمن فَقَالَ:  إِنَّكَ تأْتي قَوْمًا منْ أَهْلِ الكِتَابِ، فَادْعُهُمْ إِلى شَهَادةِ أَنْ لا إِله إِلاَّ اللَّه، وأَنِّي رسولُ اللَّه، فَإِنْ أَطاعُوا لِذلكَ، فَأَعْلِمهُم أَنَّ اللَّه تَعالى افْتَرَض عَلَيْهِمْ خمْسَ صَلواتٍ في كلِّ يَوْمٍ ولَيْلَةٍ، فَإِنْ هُمْ أَطَاعُوا لِذلكَ، فأَعْلِمهُم أَنَّ اللَّه افْتَرَض علَيْهِمْ صَدقة تُؤْخَذُ مِنْ أَغْنِيائِهم فَتُردُّ عَلى فُقَرائِهم، فَإِنْ هُمْ أَطَاعُوا لِذلَكَ، فَإِيَّاكَ وكَرائِم أَمْوالِهم وَاتَّقِ دَعْوة َالمظْلُومِ، فَإِنَّهُ لَيْسَ بَيْنَهَا وبيْنَ اللَّهِ حِجَابٌ متفقٌ عَلَيهِ.

Mu'adh (May Allah be pleased with him) reported:

The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) sent me as a governor to Yemen and (at the time of departure) he instructed me thus: "You will go to people of the Scripture (i.e., the Jews and the Christians). First of all invite them to testify that La ilaha ill Allah (There is no true god except Allah) and that Muhammad (ﷺ) is His slave and Messenger; and if they accept this, then tell them that Allah has enjoined upon them five Salat (prayers) during the day and night; and if they accept it, then tell them that Allah has made the payment of Zakat obligatory upon them. It should be collected from their rich and distributed among their poor; and if they agree to it, don't take (as a share of Zakat) the best of their properties. Beware of the supplications of the oppressed, for there is no barrier between it and Allah."

The prophet here sent only one person. Someone may say that this hadith is ahad, and that's right, but the fact the prophet Muhammed sent various individuals is mutawateer.

The Quran says

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا إِن جَاءَكُمْ فَاسِقٌ بِنَبَإٍ فَتَبَيَّنُوا أَن تُصِيبُوا قَوْمًا بِجَهَالَةٍ فَتُصْبِحُوا عَلَىٰ مَا فَعَلْتُمْ نَادِمِينَ

O ye who believe! If a wicked person comes to you with any news, ascertain the truth, lest ye harm people unwittingly, and afterwards become full of repentance for what ye have done. (Surah el Hujrat verse 6)

If we shouldn't believe the news of an individual, then what's the point of ascertaining?

« on: July 21, 2018, 06:57:01 AM »
I have noticed that you dismiss sahih hadiths in Bukhari and Muslim, brother Osama. You shouldn't do this, because if the hadith was proved to be narrated from the prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), then we should accept it. If you would like to prove that a hadith is not true in sahih Bukhari, then you should prove that it has not been narrated correctly from the prophet Muhammad (ﷺ). I advise you to study the Science of Hadith, and you'll indeed comprehend what I'm talking about.

Many people claim that the nikap is supported in Quran and is even fard like prayer,  but isn't nikap a problem? Anyone can use it to hide their face identity,  right?  Plus, criminal might even use it to walk freely in the streets.

« on: May 23, 2018, 08:14:50 PM »
Hello there, I wonder if it's possible for all people to be Muslims,  or does the contradict the fact that the majority of people are infidels according to the holy Quran?

« on: May 18, 2018, 11:29:13 AM »
Is there any specific age for marriage in Islam? I have heard some salafis sheiks saying that it's even permissible to marry a 4 years old! How is that possible?!

Allah's said in the Quran: (وَالنَّجْمِ إِذَا هَوَى * مَا ضَلَّ صَاحِبُكُمْ وَمَا غَوَى * وَمَا يَنْطِقُ عَنِ الْهَوَى * إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْيٌ يُوحَى) [النجم: 1-4]. which is translated as By the star when it descends,* Your companion [Muhammad] has not strayed, nor has he erred,* Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination.* It is not but a revelation revealed,) Quran [Surah al Najm 1-4]

Our topic today is about this verse: "By the star when it descends". The word هَوَى is the one which is translated as descends, but the verse doesn't make much sense, does it? Even 1400 years ago, they knew that stars don't fall down, but science tells us that stars die. The outer parts of the star are expelled violently into space, while the core completely collapses under its own weight.

The word هَوَى can also mean death, هوَى الرَّجُلُ هُوِيّاً وَهَوَاءً : هَلَكَ ، مَاتَ
So translating this word as descends doesn't make sense, because even if we assumed that our prophet is making up this religion from his mind, then he wouldn't say "by the star when it descends". So we have two choices whether the word هَوَى means descends or die, but as we proved that it can't mean descends, so it actually means die here. So the translation of this verse should be like this "By the star when it dies"

How could an illiterate man who lived 1400 years ago in a desert know that stars die? And again the Quran proves to be God's true words.

« on: February 01, 2018, 06:45:13 AM »
Hello there, brother. I just wanted to tell to not leave your religion for just a few claims. It doesn't matter if the claim sounded unrefutable. There will always be an answer. Don't you think that all these lies that have been made by them, and have been refuted are enough to prove that their new claims are also rubbish. So please don't be from those who keep leaving and converting to Islam and leaving again over time. The Quran told us that these people won't be forgiven by God.

Hello there, I just thought about David Wood and decided to watch a new video from his videos, and then I realized how weak and funny his points were. I can't share the link here. However, you can watch it on youtube. David wood made many comparisons between The prophet Muhammad(Peace be upon him) and Paul, but a one comparison is enough to show that all his videos are blatant lies.

So, without further ado, let's get started.

Paul vs. The prophet Muhammad(Peace be upon him): Conclusion (PvM)

-He says that our prophet was illiterate caravan trader and Paul was an brilliant scholar
Well that was hilarious because being illiterate doesn't make you inferior to someone. Our prophet was sent as a messanger not as a fighter, or a scientist. This is like comparing a football player to a swimmer

-He says that Paul died an honorable death as martyr while our prophet died a disgraceful death like a false prophet
Hmmm.....He is pointing out that our prophet was poisoned, but actually anyone who studies Islamic history will know that our prophet wasn't killed, but rather died like normal people. The angle of death even asked him whether he wants to die or to stay alive. There's enough respones for the hadith of poisoning.

He says that our prophet's message insults Jesus while Paul's message honors Jesus
Actually we as Muslims are supposed to respect all prophets of Islam, and Jesus is one of them, so I guess no.

-He says that our prophet spoke none of relevant languages while Paul spoke all of the relevant languages.
How on earth will that make Paul better than our prophet?! What kind of logic do you use, David Wood?

-He says that our prophet's teachings were heavily influenced by paganism while paul's weren't
Because pagans didn't want justice. They always considered poor people inferior to them, and they treated black people worse than animals.

I think these 3 points are enough to show you how a blatant liar, and an illogical man is David Wood.

Hello there, after doing some research, I have just found a new scientific miracle in the Quran! Here's it:

Ants' Exoskeleton in the Quran!

Until, when they came upon the valley of the ants, an ant said, "O ants, enter your dwellings that you not be crushed by Solomon and his soldiers while they perceive not." Quran [27:18]

We all can obviously notice here that the Quran used the word "crushed", and the word that is translated as crushed is يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ.

The word يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ is the same as the word حطم. The difference is just that the word يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ is the form of the word حطم[ in reported speech and plural.

Let's look at what lisaan al arab said about the word حطم.

(حَطَمَــهُ) مِنْ بَابِ ضَرَبَ أَيْ كَسَرَهُ (فَانْــحَطَمَ) وَ (تَــحَطَّمَ) . وَ (التَّحْطِيمُ) التَّكْسِيرُ. وَ

حطم الــحَطْمُ كَسْرُكَ الشَّيْءَ اليابِسَ، حَطَمْــتُه فانْــحَطَمَ، والحُطَامُ ما تَــحَطَّم من ذلك. وقِشْرُ البَيْضِ حُطَامُه.

If we looked carefully, we will find out that the word حطم means كسر

And if we translated the word كسر. We mostly get break, crash, and crush

As you can see that all these definitions are used for solid things, so the Quran is saying that ants are a solid things? No! It turns out that ants have a very strong skeleton. This skeleton is called exoskeleton, and it's mostly made of chitin. Unlike humans, ants have their skeleton outside, that is why it's called exoskeleton. Ants' exoskeleton is actually very solid and strong. they are capable of lifting a weight many times it's own weight, so imagine having a very solid and strong armor sticking to you, even if you have organisms inside. You'll still make a "crushing" sound, and you would still get crushed because of your armor that is part of you, so ants will get crushed because of their exoskeleton that is part of them! A robot would still be considered crushed even if it had some real organisms inside!

Another thing, the Quran used the word crushed instead of squashed. This should be referring to something.  Normal people would have used يسحقنكم instead of يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ , because يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ is used for solid things. Is there anyone who believed that ants are a solid things 1400 years ago?

Again the Quran was proved to be God's true word! Isn't it amazing how these scientific miracles are hidden waiting people to discover them, even myself didn't notice that this word contain a scientific fact!


After doing some research, I have found a new scientific error in the bible! It's regarding the creation of the universe. Here's it:

Creation according to the bible

The Creation of the World
1 In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.

3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.


As you all can see that the according to the bible, earth was created before light and was formless. This is a serious error here.

The first light appeared approximately 240,000 to 300,000 years after the big bang. While earth began to form after 9.1 billion years after the big bang..

But how can we know that? Very simple.

The big bang is thought to have happened 13.7 billion years ago and the Earth is 4.6 billion years old so the earth formed 13.7 - 4.6 = 9.1 billion years after the big bang.

For example, if your father is 55 years and you're 12, this means that you were born after 43 years after he was born.

I hope brother Osama add this error to his collection.

You have been doing well, brother Osama, but I think you should start doing topics about evolution, intelligent design, refuting atheists arguments, etc. You should start doing topics about proving God's existence, proving that evolution needs a creator. You know what I mean. I guess this would awesome, since that atheists always claim that we don't need a creator and there's no evidence for God. This would be enough to just shut their mouths.

Hello there, I have just heard from a Muslim answering a question on Quora, that a non-Muslim  can go to paradise if he commit good deeds.

He says: "Allah makes it extremely clear that non-Muslims can go to heaven Quran 3:113-115:
There are some among the People of the Book who are upright, who recite God’s revelations during the night, who bow down in worship, who believe in God and the Last Day, who order what is right and forbid what is wrong, who are quick to do good deeds. These people are among the righteous and they will not be denied [the reward] for whatever good deeds they do: God knows exactly who is conscious of Him.

I may have been unclear on 2 levels. The first is the concept of People of the Book. People of the Book are not Muslims, but followers of other divinely inspired religions like Christianity and Judaism.

The second is the nature of the reward promised by Allah to these non-Muslims who happen to do good deeds. I only quoted 3:113-115, where Allah describes the reward in ambiguous terms but also declares that these non-Muslims 'are among the righteous' which is a term Allah reserves for those who go to Heaven. In 3:116-117 he contrasts them with idolaters who do not commit good deeds and will go to  Hell. The strong implication is that the reward for those who commit good is Heaven. Here are the verses together with 3:112 added to the front:

They have drawn God’s wrath upon themselves. They are overshadowed by weakness, too, because they have persistently disbelieved in God’s revelation and killed prophets without any right, all because of their disobedience and boundless transgression. But they are not all alike. There are some among the People of the Book who are upright, who recite God’s revelations during the night, who bow down in worship, who believe in God and the Last Day, who order what is right and forbid what is wrong, who are quick to do good deeds. These people are among the righteous and they will not be denied [the reward] for whatever good deeds they do: God knows exactly who is conscious of Him. As for those who disbelieve, neither their possessions nor their children will help them against God—they will be companions in the Fire, there to remain— and whatever they give away in this life will be nullified: a frosty wind strikes and destroys the harvest of people who have wronged themselves. It was not God who wronged them; they wronged themselves. Quran 3:112-117"

Here's the link to the question:
Just search about Aziz Gilani's answer.

Could someone refute this please??

Hello, I was wondering if a hadith is considered sahih, does it make a true hadith 100% why can't the hadith be wrong but scholars have considered sahih? And if a hadith is considered weak, does that make it false 100%? I'm looking forward to your answers.

Hello, It's been a long time since the last time i have visited this site, anyway i am having a problem and i needed some help, every time someone asks a religious question, many atheists answer immediately. So i can't find any good refutation to what they say. To be honest i still didn't study evolution. But until that i won't just keep looking at their brainwashing answers, someone needs to stand! So if anyone has studied evolution and biology, please provide me  a refutation to this claim "According to evolution, and natural selection. We do not need Designer, plus that Intelligent design contradicts evolution and natural selection" I'm looking forward to seeing your answers. Oh another thing, i have been learning English since the last month, and i'm still learning. So could anyone tell me if there're any errors in what i wrote. and thanks

Pages: [1] 2

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube