Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Qualities of Allah

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 ... 10
31
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Tenses Question
« on: May 26, 2021, 10:09:13 PM »
Assalamu Alaykum,
I just want to ask why does the Quran refer to future and present events as past tense? There are many examples, like Surah 56:1 is one of them: "When the Occurance occurs," إِذَا وَقَعَتِ الْوَاقِعَةُ

The word used here is وَقَعَتْ, which is actually a past tense verb which means "occured" so the literal meaning would be "When the Occurance occured," instead of "occurs". So why does the Quran talk about the Day of Judgment in the past tense instead of the future tense?

Also, Surah 4:148 says, "Allah does not like negative thoughts to be voiced—except by those who have been wronged. Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing."

لَا يُحِبُّ اللهُ الْجَهْرَ بِالسُّوْءِ مِنَ الْقَوْلِ إِلَّا مَنْ ظُلِمَ وَكَانَ اللهُ سَمِيْعًا عَلِيْمًا

The word used for "is" in "Allah is" is كَانَ, which is actually a past tense verb (can it be used in the present tense?)"was". So the literal meaning of وَكَانَ الله is "Allah was," instead of "Allah is". But Allah is always hearing and knowing. Instead of كَانَ, the word could have been يَكُونُ (no?), which is the present tense "is". So why does Allah use past tense verbs to describe  things that are in the present or future?

32
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Abrogation
« on: May 22, 2021, 05:31:26 PM »
Jazakallah Khayran for answering the questions. I guess you have to send your daughter to Islamic schools. And you have to be really careful.

33
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Abrogation
« on: May 22, 2021, 05:25:00 PM »
Also wow you definitely hate Wstern women a lot, lol. And who was that one guy who said that, you knew him?

34
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Abrogation
« on: May 22, 2021, 05:20:08 PM »
Everything has been answered but now I have one question. I thought Muhammad memorized the whole quran, wasn't he a hafiz?

35
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Abrogation
« on: May 21, 2021, 02:26:08 PM »
For point 1, now I dont understand how this is abrogation anymore. One is about money and the other is about marriage. I just don't understand why muslim scholars say this is an abrogation. So this one is solved.

For point 2, the points are cleared. But I just want to know what you mean by this Verse is talking about Prophet Muhammad learning from Jibreel. But now I understand that this Verse is just signifying Allah's power and has nothing to do with the Quran.

For point 3, however, I don't understand why Allah would say    ​" اَوْ يَجْعَلَ اللهُ لَهُنَّ سَبِيْلًا (Or God ordains another way for them)"
​Don't these words sound like Allah will later abrogate this ruling? (Like 24:2)? I mean I believe there is no abrogation in the Quran, and if there is no abrogation in the Quran, this ruling MUST only refer to lesbians because it is a different punishment for straight (man-woman) adultery as 24:2 declares. So please try to describe to me why Allah would say "or God ordains another way for them" if there is no abrogation.

Thank you so much.

36
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Abrogation
« on: May 14, 2021, 05:17:32 PM »
Assalamu Alaykum everyone,
I was reading the Quran and when I reached quran 2:240 which says, "Those of you who die leaving widows should bequeath for them a year’s maintenance without forcing them out. But if they choose to leave, you are not accountable for what they reasonably decide for themselves. And Allah is Almighty, All-Wise," guess what happened. The footnote mentioned our enemy, abrogation, was supposed to eat this verse but forgot because this ruling was replaced by 2:234. 2:234 says, "As for those of you who die and leave widows behind, let them observe a waiting period of four months and ten days. When they have reached the end of this period, then you are not accountable for what they decide for themselves in a reasonable manner. And Allah is All-Aware of what you do."

Two different rulings. One says if a husband dies then the will is that wives will be provided for a year. The other one says to observe a waiting period of 4 months and ten days and then do whatever they want. Also for the 2:240 verse, the wife can do whatever she wants whenever but the 2:234 verse says to wait for 4 months and ten. And know most scholars believe that 2:234 abrogated 2:240. But there is supposed to be no abrogations! That is 1 part of this question.

Part 2 Surah A'ala Verses 6-7 say, "We will have you recite ˹the Quran, O  Prophet,˺ so you will not forget ˹any of it˺, unless Allah wills otherwise. He surely knows what is open and what is hidden."Why did it say "unless Allah wills otherwise?" The footnote is saying that this means God will make the Prophet forget abrogated rulings. But there should be no abrogations!

Part 3 This is about 4:15-16, which you claim refer to lesbians and gays. "˹As for˺ those of your women who commit illegal intercourse—call four witnesses from among yourselves. If they testify, confine the offenders to their homes until they die or Allah ordains a ˹different˺ way for them. And the two among you men who commit this sin—discipline them. If they repent and mend their ways, relieve them. Surely Allah is ever Accepting of Repentance, Most Merciful."

"Or Allah ordains a different way for them," this prompted scholars to say that this verse is about man-woman adultery and that this verse was going to be abrogated because Allah will ordain a different way. They believed this verse was abrogated by 24:2, which talks about flogging 100 times the adulters. But there is supposed to be no abrogation, so can you explain why it says "Or Allah ordains a different way for them" and why this verse is actually referring to homosexuals and not man-woman adultery?

Please, please address and answer each part

Jazakumullah Khayran

37
Eid Mubarak.

38
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Reproducible Miracle
« on: May 03, 2021, 12:46:59 PM »
Wa Alaykumu Assalam brother Osama.

39
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Reproducible Miracle
« on: May 01, 2021, 02:45:44 PM »
Taken from the article: https://www.answering-christianity.com/rk_2.htm,


B. [/b]   NUMEROLOGY THAT DOESN’T ADD UP![/b]
[/color][/font]
B. NUMEROLOGY THAT DOESN’T ADD UP![/font][/b]Rashad Khalifa claims that the his “19” code PROVES that 9:128-129 were falsely added to the Quran:[/font]
“A superhuman mathematical system pervades the Quran and serves to guard and authenticate every element in it. . . . ..The evidence presented in this Appendix incontro-vertibly removes these human injections, restores the Quran to its pristine purity, and illustrates a major function of the mathematical miracle, namely, to protect the Quran from the slightest tampering. Thus, the code rejects ONLY the false injections 9:128-129.”[/font]
Appendix 24 of the Authorized English translation of the Quran of Dr. Rashad Khalifa,
[/color]http://www.submission.org/tampering.html
[/font]
 
Unfortunately, for Rashad Khalifa
[/font]“the numbers don’t even add up!”[/font]
Incredibly, Rashad Khalifa issued TWO DIFFERENT EDITIONS of the Quran - one WITH VERSES 9:128-129 and one WITHOUT - and claimed that BOTH had been “authenticated” by his “19” formula!
 
Read the surprising findings of Meherally Abkarally:
 
 [/color]“RASHAD'S FIRST PUBLICATION (1981)
Title: QURAN: THE FINAL SCRIPTURE
ISBN 0-934894-19-1 Library of Congress Card No. 81-80923
. . .
 
“In this FIRST publication the verses 9: 128/129 of the Quran are NOT DELETED. Please note the word "God" (Allah) appears in verse 129.
 
“On page 472 of his FIRST publication, the total count of the words "Allah" in the Qur'an is mentioned as 2698 (19x42=2698).

“In his commentary below Rashad makes comments on verse 128, Later on Rashad Khalifa deletes this verse in his SECOND publication.
 
 
[/color]“RASHAD'S SECOND PUBLICATION (1989)
Title: QURAN: THE FINAL SCRIPTURE
ISBN 0-934894-57-1 Price U.S. $ 57.00
[/size][/font]
In this SECOND Publication the Surah 9 ends with verse 127. The verses number 128 and 129 are expunged. In his commentary below Rashad Khalifa declares them as the false verses.
 
“Surprisingly on page 627 below, in his SECOND publication, Rashad shows the total number of counts for the word "Allah" in the Qur'an to be the same as before i.e. 2698.
 
“ALTHOUGH RASHAD HAD DELETED TWO VERSES AND WITHIN THOSE TWO VERSES THERE WAS THE WORD "ALLAH" AS SEEN IN THE EARLIER SCANNED IMAGE, HE KEPT THE COUNT SAME AS BEFORE!!!
 
“IS THIS NOT A DECEPTION???”
 
[/color]http://mostmerciful.com/deceit-one.htm
 
This question is UNANSWERABLE.
 
Moreover, the fraudulent “numbers games” that Rashad Khalifa plays to justify deletion of verses 9:128-129, merely prove that the deletion is purely a product of AHADITH - including numerological ahadith fabricated by Rashad Khalifa himself!
[/font][/t] 



[/color][/font]

40
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Reproducible Miracle
« on: May 01, 2021, 02:33:43 PM »
Well I think Brother Osama proved somewhere that Rashad Khalifa removed 9:128-129 in his translation of the Quran but did not remove them in the number 19 miracle calculation.  He pretended to remove them in his number 19 calculation of the Quran.

41
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Reproducible Miracle
« on: April 30, 2021, 11:21:46 AM »
Nice i searched his name up and he is a google scholar. He has social media where he posts things about number 19 also.

https://www.google.com/search?q=gokmen+altay&oq=gokmen+altay&aqs=chrome..69i57j0j0i22i30l2j69i60.6754j0j7&client=ms-android-boost-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

42
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Baal and the OT
« on: April 29, 2021, 10:29:47 AM »
The ONLY verse in the Quran that talks about Baal is 37:125 and it is when Prophet Ilyaas (Elijah) rebuked his people for worshipping Baal.

"Do you call on Baal, and abandon the Best of creators?"

اَتَدْعُوْنَ بَعْلًا وَّتَذَرُوْنَ اَحْسَنَ الْخَالِقِيْنَ

This is, as I said, the only verse in the Quran that addresses Baal. There is no place (Islamic sources or Quran) that says Allah is Baal. So, I think Osama, you should add this Verse to your article and say this is the only Verse in the Quran that talks about Baal to spit in the infidels' faces even more.


43
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Baal and the OT
« on: April 28, 2021, 12:04:07 AM »
Another thing, why is Yahweh calling himself someone's husband in the first place? Isn't that blasphemy?

44
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Baal and the OT
« on: April 28, 2021, 12:01:41 AM »
So Yahweh discontinued using Baal. I ignored the Book of Isaiah because I just assumed that it would be the same context that Yahweh was going to be called husband instead of "master" But your explanation makes sense (that Yahweh called himself Baal before) . And by the way, I like your term toiletianity. Its funny how you come up with new words like these.

45
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Baal and the OT
« on: April 27, 2021, 05:13:37 PM »
Ok I think I get it because I searched up the verses and they said "for your lord is your husband" But I noticed something strange, just before the Hosea verse, it appears that the God was angry with someone for worshipping Baal (I think). Then the NASB 1995 translation of verse 2:16 of Hosea says, ""It will come about in that day," declares the LORD, "That you will call Me Ishi (Husband, according to other translations) And will no longer call Me Baali (Master, according to other translations)."

The problem is why is this translation saying that Master is Baal and Husband is Ishi? This is the opposite of what you are saying? You said that the god in Hosea called himself Baal, while the NASB 1995 translation says the god of Hosea said not to call him Baal? Can you check this problem out? The translation is saying the opposite of what you say!

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 ... 10

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube