Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - A proud Muslim

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
61
Hello there, after doing some research, I have just found a new scientific miracle in the Quran! Here's it:


Ants' Exoskeleton in the Quran!


Until, when they came upon the valley of the ants, an ant said, "O ants, enter your dwellings that you not be crushed by Solomon and his soldiers while they perceive not." Quran [27:18]

We all can obviously notice here that the Quran used the word "crushed", and the word that is translated as crushed is يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ.

The word يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ is the same as the word حطم. The difference is just that the word يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ is the form of the word حطم[ in reported speech and plural.

Let's look at what lisaan al arab said about the word حطم.

http://lisaan.net/search/%D8%AD%D8%B7%D9%85

(حَطَمَــهُ) مِنْ بَابِ ضَرَبَ أَيْ كَسَرَهُ (فَانْــحَطَمَ) وَ (تَــحَطَّمَ) . وَ (التَّحْطِيمُ) التَّكْسِيرُ. وَ

حطم الــحَطْمُ كَسْرُكَ الشَّيْءَ اليابِسَ، حَطَمْــتُه فانْــحَطَمَ، والحُطَامُ ما تَــحَطَّم من ذلك. وقِشْرُ البَيْضِ حُطَامُه.

If we looked carefully, we will find out that the word حطم means كسر


And if we translated the word كسر. We mostly get break, crash, and crush

http://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-en/%D9%83%D8%B3%D8%B1/

As you can see that all these definitions are used for solid things, so the Quran is saying that ants are a solid things? No! It turns out that ants have a very strong skeleton. This skeleton is called exoskeleton, and it's mostly made of chitin. Unlike humans, ants have their skeleton outside, that is why it's called exoskeleton. Ants' exoskeleton is actually very solid and strong. they are capable of lifting a weight many times it's own weight, so imagine having a very solid and strong armor sticking to you, even if you have organisms inside. You'll still make a "crushing" sound, and you would still get crushed because of your armor that is part of you, so ants will get crushed because of their exoskeleton that is part of them! A robot would still be considered crushed even if it had some real organisms inside!

Another thing, the Quran used the word crushed instead of squashed. This should be referring to something.  Normal people would have used يسحقنكم instead of يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ , because يَحْطِمَنَّكُمْ is used for solid things. Is there anyone who believed that ants are a solid things 1400 years ago?

Again the Quran was proved to be God's true word! Isn't it amazing how these scientific miracles are hidden waiting people to discover them, even myself didn't notice that this word contain a scientific fact!

62
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: earth
« on: August 26, 2017, 06:55:31 AM »
Thumma can also mean moreover. I believe that you are referring to:

Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, "Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion." They said, "We have come willingly." Quran [41:11]

Thumma here is translated as "Then", but it can also mean moreover, or and. I believe that it means and here because even people knew that heaven already existed before earth. It's simple logic. In order to create earth, you need to create heaven first.


63
As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,

I never claimed these Noble Verses to be a Scientific Miracle.  I only used them to demonstrate that the Glorious Quran is, - as always and no surprise, - in full agreement with science, even when astronomers recently confirmed that the Universe contains trillions and trillions of stars and galaxies.  These Noble Verses certainly prove this to be 100%, because Allah Almighty called the hypothetical oath, a GRAND OATH.

Allah Almighty even spoke about the CLUSTERS OF DARK MATTER AND COSMIC WEBS.  Please visit:

www.answering-christianity.com/detailed_meanings_of_scientific_words_in_verses.htm#explosion_of_universe

A hypothetical Grand Oath from Allah Almighty would be suitable for the trillions and trillions of stars and galaxies, and the Dark Matter, and the Cosmic Webs, and the positions of all of the celestial bodies in the Universe that Allah Almighty assigned for each and everyone of them.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

The reason, I asked you such a question is because many people claimed that these two verses are talking about a scientific miracles, so I wondered what did you think of them.

Another thing, why not do some research about them, they might be really a scientific miracle.

64
As'salamu Alaikum dear brothers,

Allah Almighty Said:

56:75 فلا اقسم بمواقع النجوم
‏56:76 وانه لقسم لو تعلمون عظيم

[056:075]  So I will not swear by the positions of the stars;
[056:076]  and, verily, it is a grand oath if ye did but know -


The Universe is so vast with its trillions of stars, that Allah Almighty if He were to swear by their positions, it would be a GRAND OATH.  It is part of the unknown why Allah Almighty made trillions of galaxies and stars.  But my theory is that because Heaven is so vast, that it is not just for us, earthlings.

I hope this helps, insha'Allah.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Brother Osama, do you believe these two verses to be a scientific miracle? If yes, could you show me how, that  is?

65
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: question to osama abdallah
« on: August 21, 2017, 02:25:41 PM »
Quote
Muhammad is not a True Prophet because he cured Qatada's eye. 

What is this, brother Osama?

66
The more galaxies are there, the more creativity we will say, and the more evidence will be there for Allah.


All these galaxies tell us that a powerful entity created them, not chance, or a mindless entity, or a mindless process that created itself magically and have put nature laws (Gravity, speed of light, etc.).

67
If I said that animals eat, would I mean that they eat as we humans eat? No.

In the Quran, it says:

"The seven heavens and the earth and whatever is in them exalt Him. And there is not a thing except that it exalts [ Allah ] by His praise, but you do not understand their [way of] exalting. Indeed, He is ever Forbearing and Forgiving." Quran [17:44].

So we conclude that the way they prostrate is definitely different from the way we prostrate. If their exalting is different, then their prostrating should be. The anteater eats the food without nibbling it with his teeth (he doesn't have teeth) let's look at the definition of eat.

 Eat : put (food) into the mouth and chew and swallow it.

This definition is for humans, not all creatures. Get it?

68
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Translation problem
« on: August 20, 2017, 06:25:19 AM »
Maybe he became an atheist after leaving Islam?

69
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Abrogated verses
« on: August 18, 2017, 05:30:02 PM »
By simply telling them, that there's no proof that peaceful verses were abrogated by violent verses. Violent verses were revealed in self defend, and the peaceful verses were revealed  to make it clear that violent verses are only about self defend. Take this verse for example:

"Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors." Quran [2:190]

This verse tells us to not attack innocent people. Once we incorporate it with other verses, we find it make more sense because the violent verses didn't say to kill all infidels. It said to attack infidels, and this verse tells us to attack infidels who attack us first.

Verses complete each other.

 Secondly, None of the scholars ever claimed that peaceful verses were ever abrogated by the violent one, and there's no hadith, or a verse that claims that.

Hope this helped.

Take care,
A proud muslim

70
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: question on 2 quranic verses
« on: August 18, 2017, 02:07:51 PM »
Hello there, as I'm being a native Arabic speaker, I decided to look at the tafsir of that particular verse, so here's what I have understood from the tafsir.

If God wanted to have an entertainment, or have a child, he would have taken it from hur, not from women on earth, but if that was a thing that God could do( of course God won't do that), then it wouldn't as we understand it, or see it, not the entertainment that we humans understand.

The word إِن means two things in this verse:

1.That we don't do such a thing, nor we would do that.

2.That it's conditional here. It simply means that if we would ever do such a thing, then it would from hur, but of course God wouldn't such a thing.

Conditional in Arabic isn't necessary something that can happen. Take this for example:

The prophet (Peace be upon him) once said that:

"Even if they place the sun in my right-hand, and the moon in my left-hand in return for giving up this matter (Dawah to Islam), I will never stop – until; - either Allah makes it (the religion of Allah) triumph or I die defending it."


Here, it was just expressing an idea, not a actual thing that could happen.

God said this, as a response, to the people who claim that he have a son, or have a wife, etc. You these obvious myths, right?

Hope this helped.

Take care,
A proud muslim

71
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: the clarity?
« on: August 18, 2017, 10:33:32 AM »
Who said that Isis are following the Quran? The real question is are they really doing that not because of money? Allah's words are obviously clear, and easy to comprehend, but that doesn't mean that every Muslim is following the Quran, word by word. There're some Muslims who acknowledge that what they are doing is haram, yet they still do it because we humans aren't perfect. Isis are certainly paid. They are incapable of following the Quran because they lost their morality. Anyone who tell you that Isis are following is definitely telling you blatant lies.

Secondly, Allah gave us free will, so if he stopped these people from doing these acts, then he is taking away our free will. In tests, free will are required. You can choose to answer, or to even leave the whole paper empty without answering any question, but eventually you'll regret what you have done.

72
Take this one from me.


The prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) didn't marry Aisha for a sexual purpose because such a marriage is prohibited in Islam, so the conclusion is the following:

1-Pedophiles marry, or rape children because of a sexual purpose, not to live a normal life and have children, but rather to just discharge their urges.

2.The prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) didn't marry Aisha because of a sexual purpose. Islam prohibit such a marriage.

3.Therefore, the prophet Muhammad was not a pedophile.


73
Incredible! I vote for this. I hope that, brother Osama, would add this to his main site.

74
Okay, as you like, brother Osama.



Take care,
A proud muslim

75
Brother Osama, if you are still confused then don't worry. Just add to your main page and people will be incapable of understanding it. It's not hard to understand, but perhaps your mind isn't accepting it.
I'm not trying to say that you're dumb. We all have different minds and thinking.




Take care,
A proud muslim

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube