Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - AMuslimDude213

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 ... 13
« on: August 25, 2017, 12:58:47 AM »
"EX-Muslims" have used these to conclude Islam contains ancient myths and so have some Atheists

So  let me do a step-by-step refutation to this

First of all the evil eye,in Islam isnt a jinn possession or anything,it isnt anything superstitious,in Islam the evil eye means Jealousy,it is caused by the envier.
So it isnt really superstitious.

Now what is the evil eye then if it isnt what the Bible says it is?
well the answer is:
The evil eye is the name for a sickness or misfortune transmitted, usually with or without intention, by someone who is envious, jealous, and covetous or even a pious person from among man or jinn.

Primary symptoms of evil eye are feelings of physical and/or emotional tiredness, unexplained bad luck or un-favorable incidences and illness. It is thought to cause drowsiness, drooping eyelids, listlessness, fatigue, weariness, lack of concentration, restlessness, discomfort, cramps, convulsions, headaches, hiccoughs, clumsiness, stomachaches, dry coughs, diarrhea, itching, hair loss, dry skin vomiting, the drying up of the milk of nursing mothers and livestock, problems with the blood and eyesight, impairment of sexual activity, impotence, sterility, disorders in menstruation, problems in pregnancy and childbirth, deficient breast milk, mastitis, and among babies and young children, incessant crying and fretting, a baby’s refusal to suckle or drink milk and other symptoms include lack of rain, the drying up of wells, the withering of fruit, sudden loss to business, and so on.

And now Al-Jinn according to pagan mythology,before Islam Jinns were not what we as Muslims think it is,Jinns were thought of as a Goblin,a Pinched-ear creature,etc,etc,so they weren't really what Islam says they were
we believe they are immaterial,they are made of Smokeless fire.
This will need a long answer though:
You aren't going to find physical proof of Jinns, because Jinns don't manifest in the physical world like human beings do. It's important to know that the secular world only recognizes what can be physically proven to exist. So if someone is possessed or inflicted by the jinn, then only the physical symptoms would be recognized by the secular world. The person inflicted by jinn might even be considered schizophrenic or have some other mental disorder or just be regarded as crazy. Take the case of Pazuzu Algarad, here's a man who had people murdered and buried in his backyard and performed animal sacrifices. Neighbors spoke of his strange behavior and and his whole house was filled with trash, symbols, animal carcasses, images and cryptic writings. To me, it seems very clear that this was a case of a person who was deeply involved with Jinns. But to a secularist, this would probably be considered a crazy, mentally-ill person who was on drugs. If the secularist saw a video on YouTube of a person who is actually affected by a Jinn, he would just regard it as acting or someone with serious mental problems. Some Muslims at times will falsely jump to conclusions about the appearance of Jinns or spirits when they don't know what's going on.
Looking for physical proof of Jinns won't work, just like looking for physical proof of Angels. Jinn also go various different names in different cultures (spirits, demons, ghosts, etc) and are said to appear in more isolated places. A lot of movies today in pop culture are based on the phenomenon of Jinn.

But if you're really really eager to see a Proof of al-jinn(and since you probably dont live like me in Arabia in a desert-area where there are sightings of shadows,paranormal activities(AKA jinn Activity) and there are alot of cases of Ruqya that are observable)

Ask anyone in your Muslim community if there is a Ruqya specialist. Then, ask him if you could join in to watch a session or two. However, you should be aware that the Ruqya specialist should not be doing any funny stuff, meaning only recitation of the Qur'an and what is allowed in the religion like dry spitting, blowing air. You should also be aware of his character and religion before you do anything with him. He should at least be someone that everyone in your community knows about his piety. I'm saying this because there are liars out there that claim to be Ruqya specialists when they are actually magicians.
I believe this is the best way to affirm your faith.

Donot fall into haram stuff that is impermissible though since trying to contact the spiritual world in a manner of Shirk is extremely fatal in the eyes of Allah SWT,and can get you to hell completely,its even in the hadith that Allah SWT will NEVER forgive the black magician.

GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Enough posts on Abdullah Sameer.
« on: August 21, 2017, 05:57:53 AM »
After reading through horribly aid-filth-filled blogs of Abdullah Sameer,that people think are "Brilliant"
Im done with this guy,all of what he said A-Z is just the same claims made by Sam Shamoun,etc,etc in a Different manner so he can seem smart.

I've refuted some of his works,rest of which have already been refuted by others,
and literally he's just looking for fame, he hasn't even told us any VALID reason he left Islam
rather than quoting a book by Richard Dawkins,or Sam Harris to prove a point,and these books have been refuted by Muslims.
and he himself Knows he's just self-deluding himself for fame and money,the way he is in his videos just shows it all,he's working for the fame,not for knowledge,not for teaching,he wants those ad revenues.

And literally he hasn't targetted Islam at all, all he has done is point towards spiritual sides of Islam and blame anything he can find,which shows he's running out of errors,

I can list a few examples which have been plagiarized from Christian apologists and already refuted:
The story of Zainab and Zaid
Muhammad SAW in Petra or Mecca?
Islam copies other religions
Embryology has an Error in islam
Abrogation Myth
Trying to make something like the Quran
Ibn Ishaq's book
Divorce in Islam.
Islam is the cause of Violence(seen in his interviews),etc

Therefore Abdullah Sameer is a Number one plagiarizer,a liar,a troll and a useful idiot who doesn't prove his points
rather just lives in his own ignorance and apparently just left Islam because "It was too strict"
Not because of Flaws.
I think his ignorance has already been exposed enough,after watching his videos and comparing anti-Islamic material to his sayings,Its all clear that he is plagiarizing and just watching Anti-Islamist videos to prove a point.
And theres proof in his own VIDEOS,he literally forces to watch The Masked Arab,etc,etc.
There's no proof of his claims rather than just sayings he mocks instead of researching,so by this we see,he really has no argument,He also is very close-minded.
Rather than searching for what is the TRUE RELIGION he just sits there and blames God for it.
rather than searching he just sits there,making videos,ignoring the teachings of Islam,just using unauthentic books like Ibn Ishaq,etc
doesn't use the Quran in context,uses weak hadiths,etc to prove a point to his gullible followers,so therefore
we see that Abdullah Sameer is a huge liar and he has no arguments and it makes me doubt,was he ever a Practising or researching Muslim? Or he just went and did Da'wah for no reason?

And on the issue of Black Magic,evil eye,Jinns,etc,etc
People have witnessed it first-hand like me,this is the Non-physical side of Islam,if the Physical side of Islam is completely true therefore the Non-physical side instantly becomes true,so we see that Islam has not even be challenged by Abdullah Sameer,he's just recycled arguments,copied the Masked arab and other youtubers,and just heavily cherrypicks from the Qur'an.
And we conclude:
Abdullah Sameer is no different than Bill Maher,Sam Harris,Richard Dawkins,Sam Shamoun,Brother Rachid or any of these people,his arguments are just gonna eventually fade away like mist due to how bad they are,infact in his blogs comments,people have already REFUTED HIM,and literally he told them to Screw off,and was being rude to them like every Atheist,one person got banned for refuting him, and the others who refuted him SILENCED him,he never responded to the ones who refuted him,he only responded to those who asked Questions,so this just shows the Ignorance of this man.

GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Can I get a answer to this?
« on: August 07, 2017, 05:58:46 PM »
You're question is irrelevant. We already know for a fact Jesus was atleast a real man. And these letters they you really think they just made this stuff up. These are letters that were sent out to christians that were passed down.

« on: August 01, 2017, 02:09:38 AM »
Nowadays,the common Atheist question and argument to Islam is this:
"Why would God be so cruel that he will test the World with SUCH harsh tests(Example:Hunger in African countries)and then send us to hell for disbelief?!"

First of all this argument is irrational and biased,because on the Harsh tests you forgot that we are also commanded to be charitable and give charity to these people who are going through this harsh test,and also these people are usually ISOLATED,they donot know what Islam is.

So if we look into Islamic sources we see that those who didn't know Islam will get one last test,from which Allah will decide they will go to Heaven or hell,and even there it depends on if the person was good or not.

NOW "Send us to hell for disbelief?!"

This argument too is irrational because Hell isnt just solely for Disbelief in the Quran and Allah SWT,Allah SWT says he will guide those who try to guide themselves to him,

And even if it was about Disbelief, it is also justified,let me post a huge refutation I wrote to Hell being unjust here

 :A very huge doubt I've seen that Muslims doubt Islam for is the concept of Hell,why would Allah SWT send you to hell?
Well,let me answer that Question,first we look to Islamic sources about hell will Allah SWT's decision be Just?
Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 2: Belief, Number 21:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri (R.A):
The Prophet [S.A.W.S] said, “When the people of Paradise will enter Paradise and the people of Hell will go to Hell, ALLAH [S.W.T] will order those who have had faith equal to the weight of a grain of mustard seed to be taken out from Hell. So they will be taken out but (by then) they will be blackened (charred). Then they will be put in the river of Haya’ (rain) or Hayat (life) (the Narrator is in doubt as to which is the right term), and they will revive like a grain that grows near the bank of a flood channel. Don’t you see that it comes out yellow and twisted?”
From the Hadith it seems yes,now lets go back to the Question many Muslims doubt due to Shirk being the worst action,first of all lets take an example and analogy think about a false teacher teaching you That the earth is flat and you believe him,and the real teacher teaches you earth is spherical you ignore him,The Real teacher then has the right to punish you,Now in the case of Shirk its like this,Allah SWT had mercy on you and created you to test you,with a non-harsh test yet you donot thank him for your own creation and you donot thank him for what you have,you are being ungrateful and looking towards false creators,now Allah SWT has the right to punish you then,think about it and contemplate on it,think about it like this Allah SWT created his creatures because he had mercy on them,to test them and all our lives think about it all our lives we haven't acknowledged him,non-acknowledgement is a sign of disrespect so by not Thanking your creator,by ignoring him because he created you,you think you will go to heaven just like that? No bro thats INJUSTICE,so Shirk is injustice because its ignoring your creator for another false creator,lets say a False teacher came to you and taught fake things like the Earth is flat,Then you say the earth is flat to the real teacher and she/he will PUNISH you for believing the false teacher's words,Allah does not see us as his children,he sees us as his Creation,and see it like this,he gave you a WHOLE LIFE,which is basically like a ETERNITY,he gave all his creatures SOO MUCH time,yet in the end you disbelieve him,It is Allah's right it is JUST for him to send you to hell because he gave you a whole life in which you could acknowledge him,but you chose not to,so therefore it is Just for Allah to send us to a eternal damnation to hell for disbelieving,Mercy has its limits.

Now the question my come up,why the Punishment for Shirk?
The answer is:

Because Shirk is ignorance your whole life,infact Shirk can be forgiven if you divert your ways back to Islam but just keeping on following it ignoring your creator till your death,the same logic applies as above,because Shirk is blatant ignorance of the true creator and is basically disrespecting the creator.

In his newest video I commented
"This is retarded,and nonsensical,Abdullah Sameer and IntrovertedSmiles himself should know that himself,
This is literally the first thing Converts research before converting,yet Mr.Sameer and IntrovertedSmiles claim to be "Ex-Muslims" yet they dont even know about THESE Issues makes me wonder,how much did they know about Islam?"

He asks me "Can you please be more specific? and please just skip the insults"(hypocrisy since he insults us soo much)

I commented back:"First of all your claim that non Muslims are the worst of all creatures is a Mistranslation we can clearly see the real translation is

" al-Baiyinah 98:6

Verily, those who [despite all evidence] are bent on denying the truth - [be they] from among the followers of earlier revelation or from among those who ascribe divinity to aught beside God - will find themselves in the fire of hell, therein to abide: they are the worst of all creatures."

Then I commented back:"And about the Quran in 60:8 should be clear to you and Abdullah Sameer both."

Then he comments again:""they are the worst of all creatures" soo how did we misinterpret that part again?"

Then some random person comes in and says:"Exactly. No mistranslation there. And note the trap. "well if you deny THE TRUTH then yea you're horrible."

And I commented:"Your claim was "The Quran says Non Muslims are the worst of creatures" but it clearly says verily,those who DESPITE ALL EVIDENCE,DENY THE TRUTH."

Then the other random person says:"Exactly. anyone that denies Islam. That would be non - muslim oh double speaker."

Then by this point IntrovertedSmiles stops commenting and runs away

I explain the verse in detail:"if you read it in arabic it says In Al Ladhee Kafaruw' min AHL AL KITHAB(From the People of the Book)!,so instead of fearmongering,learn arabic and read the Quran for yourselves."

Then the other random person comes back in and says:"wow that didn't take long. It's the 21st century. Don't give me that crap that I have to read it in Arabic."

Then I comment back the last comment before everyone runs away and say:"Well then you may never understand the Quran clearly,it is in Classical arabic,for a complete translation you need to read Yusuf Ali's translation which took the translation 98% Accurately,infact even Sahih Translation a ONLINE Quran translation gives us the accurate translations too."

I have been going through many of these Ex Muslim materials,and I noticed many many similar things about them,one thing is that they plagiarize material,if you go to IntrovertedSmiles channel and see the newest discussion between Abdullah Sameer and him,from this we see Abdullah Sameer is clearly plagiarizing off of Ibn Warraq,Richard Carrier,Answering Islam,etc,etc. this is indeed what I found the most satirically stupid about them,

IntrovertedSmiles is a negative idiot who insults Muslims and Islam for spiritual beliefs,which is kinda hypocritical,why? because Buddhism has spiritual beliefs too but he says their beliefs make sense!.

Abdullah Sameer also plagiarizes,you can see videos like "Zainab bint Jahsh's Marriage to Muhammad(SAW)",etc,etc all plagiarized material with no basis at all, It seems as if Ex-Muslims have no argument against the Qur'an or Islam but bring out plagiarized material,like Zainab bint Jahsh,Spirituality,etc,etc
And both of these youtubers and "Ex-Muslims" have been mostly using arguments from Ibn Warraq, and possibly even from Converted2Islam! because Converted2Islam and Abdullah Sameer have basically almost the SAME material,repeated, you can compare it and see for yourselves.

These people literally waste time speaking infront of a camera without researching things for themselves and reusing same old arguments

The main core Argument Abdullah Sameer bought up in his Discussion is that Muslims will kill him,or that Islam teaches violence,and all the same oft-repeated Lies,and this guy is supposed to be a ex-da'ee yet he hasnt even researched the issues of Non-Muslim friends in Islam and forgot 60:8,
Now his claim is that "Non-Muslims are the worst of creatures in Islam"

Wait a minute? I thought Da'ees knew arabic,if you read the verse in Arabic the literal Translation is this:

" al-Baiyinah 98:6

Verily, those who [despite all evidence] are bent on denying the truth - [be they] from among the followers of earlier revelation or from among those who ascribe divinity to aught beside God - will find themselves in the fire of hell, therein to abide: they are the worst of all creatures."

These guys are clowns now because they are not only Acting negatively towards Muslims,openly practicing intolerance,openly lying about Islam and The Quran,and the Prophet SAW, and whats the worst thing is that Abdullah Sameer is a professional stalker,out of his videos he stalks Muslims and comments on their videos,when he is refuted he runs off and brings in his "Subscribers" to do his work and when he gets caught out repeating old arguments,he literally stops speaking about Islam and starts speaking about you and insults you,ignores your comments and goes on with his own tyrade,I've seen this guy comment negativity and blatantly LIE about Islam in many Islamic videos,He also Adheres to emotional argument about hell when Hell is actually Justified for the evil ones,I mean it wouldn't be fair to have everyone in heaven,because then Heaven will just be like Earth and there is no Point of Heaven then.

And another thing I've noticed Abdullah Sameer is that he promotes themaskedArab's arguments and reuses them in his videos like he literally compared ISIS to Islam,and said they are the same thing,I think Abdullah Sameer needs to learn the Quran and hadith again,and so Does IntrovertedSmiles because It makes me doubt whether the really are "Ex-Muslims" as they claim to be?

"Why did God create us?"
Well,simply to worship him in Islam.

"Why Did God create us to worship him?"

If we look into the Islamic narrative to the Jinn,they were unjust because they didn't need to worship so Allah SWT revealed Prayer to The Prophets(Peace be Upon them) So it won't be unfair,and it would be just,and we had a way of getting into Heaven,
think of it as,Someone wants to test how you will do at sea,so he pushes you off a cliff,there are sharks in there(take sharks as waswasa and ways of Shaytaan and,well Life itself) and you have a map and The Gear for getting to a tropical Island where you will abide in Bliss eternally,if you were smart enough and wanted to save your own life,you would use the Gear you had,and get to that tropical Island. but if you say "Why Throw me in here to test me?!" That means you failed the test.

"Why test us in the first place?"
Allah SWT created the soul before Humanity in the heavens(this is my theory btw)
So if there were bad souls and Good souls in heaven that means it doesn't matter to have a heaven because Heaven would just be as bad as earth.
so thats why Allah SWT created the test which is life,and created human beings and put souls in them.

"Why create the soul?"

So about the Soul Allah SWT created us simply because of his mercy
If he wanted to be un-merciful and unjust
He would've just left our souls uncreated
And left the world to corrupt
Under creatures like Dinosaurs,the Jinn,etc,etc.
But Allah SWT did NOT want to leave the world empty(if you ask if why were these creatures too were created)
Due to his compassion and mercy if he didnt create the Universe that means it would've been Unjust for Allah SWT since that means he didnt want us to be created and left us to just be uncreated beings. now that wouldn't have been fair for Allah SWT. if he didn't create the heavens,or anything even the Angels would have found it unfair because that would've been unmerciful and greedy to only have himself in the universe,but since Allah SWT was the all merciful he created us,his creation since Allah SWT was not greedy,he gave us breath,soul and a life,and he gave us free will,rational thought and everything we need to get to heaven so from this the Question was answered,simply because Allah SWT was not Greedy and he was compassionate about creation so he created us.

I'm very disappointed at the "Ex-Muslims" Who left Islam due to this fool,I have been checking through his site,and I found complete foolishness
and indirect David-Wood like arguments let me list some and their explanations,I will do this time to time,so that doubts on these arguments he presents finish,his videos are just all videos of mocking Islam with no proof at all,and just twists on verses and his thoughts with no evidence so I wont be refuting those unless if its an attack on a Muslim brother like Ali Dawah,my next post will be on Ali Dawah and Abdullah Sameer

And We have certainly beautified the nearest heaven with stars and have made [from] them what is thrown at the devils and have prepared for them the punishment of the Blaze. (Quran 67:5)

The Prophet (S) said, “If it was not for the Israelites, meat would not decay. And if it was not for Eve, wives would never betray their husbands.” (Bukhari and Muslim)

Narrated Abu Dharr:
Once I was with the Prophet (ﷺ) in the mosque at the time of sunset. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “O Abu Dharr! Do you know where the sun sets?” I replied, “Allah and His Apostle know best.” He said, “It goes and prostrates underneath (Allah’s) Throne; and that is Allah’s Statement:– ‘And the sun runs on its fixed course for a term (decreed). And that is the decree of All-Mighty, the All-Knowing….’ (36.38)

“We were with the Prophet (ﷺ) and the sun became eclipsed. He got up and went to the masjid, dragging his garment in haste. The people stood with him and he prayed two rak’ahs as they usually prayed. When the eclipse ended he addressed us and said ‘The sun and the moon are two of the signs of Allah (SWT), with which He strikes fear into His slaves.  (Nasai)

…And if a man’s discharge proceeded that of the woman, then the child resembles the father, and if the woman’s discharge proceeded that of the man, then the child resembles the mother. (Bukhari)

And they followed [instead] what the devils had recited during the reign of Solomon. It was not Solomon who disbelieved, but the devils disbelieved, teaching people magic and that which was revealed to the two angels at Babylon, Harut and Marut. But the two angels do not teach anyone unless they say, “We are a trial, so do not disbelieve [by practicing magic].” And [yet] they learn from them that by which they cause separation between a man and his wife. But they do not harm anyone through it except by permission of Allah . And the people learn what harms them and does not benefit them. But the Children of Israel certainly knew that whoever purchased the magic would not have in the Hereafter any share. And wretched is that for which they sold themselves, if they only knew.  (Quran 2:102)

I think we need to make a site refuting this deluded man,his claims are all stupidly funny,and its all his own twists on verses,so we should correct this man
(PS Idk how to script so I cant do it xD)

Abdullah Sameer is starting to get desperate and lying about the Quran

4:54 "Shirk is the biggest injustice?",Is what Abdullah Sameer thinks what 4:54 says.
But 4:54 instead says
" Or do they envy people for what Allah has given them of His bounty? But we had already given the family of Abraham the Scripture and wisdom and conferred upon them a great kingdom."

And even if it is What Abdullah Sameer thinks he questions,"Why is Allah jealous and made hell,why send us all to hell?!"
"Would I send my children to hell for being disobedient? HELL NO!"
First of all I thought Sameer didnt believe in Hell
and second of all think about it like this Allah SWT created his creatures because he had mercy on them,to test them and all our lives think about it all our lives we haven't acknowledged him,non-acknowledgement is a sign of disrespect so by not Thanking your creator,by ignoring him because he created you,you think you will go to heaven just like that? No bro thats INJUSTICE,so Shirk is injustice because its ignoring your creator for another false creator,lets say a False teacher came to you and taught fake things like the Earth is flat,Then you say the earth is flat to the real teacher and she/he will PUNISH you for believing the false teacher's words, and then lets go to his other argument Allah does not see us as his children,he sees us as his Creation,and see it like this,he gave you a WHOLE LIFE,which is basically like a ETERNITY,he gave all his creatures SOO MUCH time,yet in the end you disbelieve him,It is Allah's right it is JUST for him to send you to hell because he gave you a whole life in which you could acknowledge him,but you chose not to,so therefore it is Just for Allah to send us to a eternal damnation to hell for disbelieving Mercy has its limits.

Oh God this person is back to show his lack of knowledge on Islam more.

He says 2:14 says
2:14 "a fragment of the heaven falling?" Didn't Muhammad realize the sky is not solid?  Or did he think the firmament was a solid structure?

First of all 2:14 doesnt even say that it says

"And when they meet those who believe, they say, "We believe"; but when they are alone with their evil ones, they say, "Indeed, we are with you; we were only mockers."

This problem has been there for a while since I really cant read the Bible,its banned in UAE libraries so can you tell me any verse against Trinity in the Bible?

"4:11-12 Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children's (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females; if only daughters, two or more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance; if only one, her share is a half. For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left a child; if no child, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth. The distribution in all cases (is) after the payment of legacies and debts. Ye know not whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit. These are settled portions ordained by Allah; and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.

In what your wives leave, your share is a half, if they leave no child; but if they leave a child, ye get a fourth; after payment of legacies and debts. In what ye leave, their share is a fourth, if ye leave no child; but if ye leave a child, they get an eighth; after payment of legacies and debts. If the man or woman whose inheritance is in question, has left neither ascendants nor descendants, but has left a brother or a sister, each one of the two gets a sixth; but if more than two, they share in a third; after payment of legacies and debts; so that no loss is caused (to any one). Thus is it ordained by Allah. and Allah is All-knowing, Most Forbearing.

4:176 They ask thee for a legal decision. Say: Allah directs (thus) about those who leave no descendants or ascendants as heirs. If it is a man that dies, leaving a sister but no child, she shall have half the inheritance: If (such a deceased was) a woman, who left no child, Her brother takes her inheritance: If there are two sisters, they shall have two-thirds of the inheritance (between them): if there are brothers and sisters, (they share), the male having twice the share of the female. Thus doth Allah make clear to you (His law), lest ye go astray. And Allah hath knowledge of all things."

Yeah, great, you have identified the relevant passages.  Now, explain what to do if a man dies intestate and is survived by his two parents, three or more daughters (but no sons), and one or more wives.

"1. The first major point to note is that there are two types of inheritors. The first category are those who have recieved a fixed inheritance, which includes the spouse and the parents. The second category includes those who take their share AFTER the shares of the first category are distributed. This includes siblings and children."

How in the heck are children included in this second category?  They obviously belong to the first.  Again, read 4:11 - Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children's (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females; if only daughters, two or more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance; if only one, her share is a half

Nowhere is it stated that the children's share comes after any allowances are made for any other heirs.  That is a complete fabrication.  You are no longer a Muslim because you have denied the clear words of the Koran.

"So if we understand this, we know that the parents and the wife would recive their amount, and the daughters would get a share of what remains. This explanation on its own solves the problem, because:

-1/3 for the parents together
-1/8 for the wife
-And for the daughters 2/3 of what remains = 2/3 of 13/24=13/36 of the total amount

So what remains after is 13/72 of the original amount. This remaining portion is to be given to whoever the deceased person appointed as their heir. The deceased can choose to have it given in charity or to the local masjid etc. If they have not specified any destination for the remaining wealth then it is given to the closest male relative."

Where are you getting any of this nonsense, Muslim?  The daughters' share is clearly out of the total estate; not after prior takers.

"2. Let us now address the specific claims. The first claim is that 2/3 (daughters) +1/3 (parents) +1/8 (wife) will add up to more than available. But the truth is that the Qur'an does not specify what the parents and the wife will recieve if there are three daughters. The Qur'an states that the parents get 1/6 each if the deceased left a child. And the wife gets 1/8 if the deceased left a child. Both times it is singular, but in the proposed scenario, there are three daughters, not one."

Oh, so you think that the Koran LEFT THIS OUT?  In that case, you're even more up a creek with this document as any kind of a legal code.

"Some confusion may have caused this misunderstanding because in some translations, the word walad (child) is mistranslated as children. But in most translations like Pickthall, Asad, Shakir, Daryabadi, Irving, etc. the word has been correctly translated in the singular form."

Yeah, and if we have this same phrasing ("left a child") in English law then it would also extend to circumstances in which more than one child survived the decedent because it would be read as "at least one child."  In the following SENTENCE, the same word (waladun) is used in a form in which it is clearly meant to refer to "any child."  "For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left a child; if no child [lit. not any child, where "any child" is "waladun"], and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth."  So it's clear that it's being used as an indefinite nominative and not restricted to a single child.

Why do Muslims have to lie about the very grammatical structure of the Koran in order to make any sense of the book?  Isn't it written in plain Arabic that is easy to understand?
Show less

"8:60 commands Muslims to fight against Non believers"

First of all 8:61 says
8:61 "And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah. Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing."

And the tafsir says:

Tafsir Ibn Kathir

“The Command to Facilitate Peace when the Enemy seeks a Peaceful Resolution
Allah says, if you fear betrayal from a clan of people, then sever the peace treaty with them, so that you both are on equal terms. If they continue being hostile and opposing you, then fight them, (But if they incline), and seek, (to peace), if they resort to reconciliation, and seek a treaty of non-hostility, (you also incline to it), and accept offers of peace from them. This is why when the pagans inclined to peace in the year of Hudaybiyah and sought cessation of hostilities for nine years, between them and the Messenger of Allah he accepted this from them, as well as, accepting other terms of peace they brought forth. `Abdullah bin Al-Imam Ahmad recorded that `Ali bin Abi Talib said that the Messenger of Allah said, (There will be disputes after me, so if you have a way to end them in peace, then do so.) Allah said next,
(and trust in Allah. ) Allah says, conduct a peace treaty with those who incline to peace, and trust in Allah. Verily, Allah will suffice for you and aid you even if they resort to peace as a trick, so that they gather and reorganize their forces…” [3]

"8;12 commands to strike off fingertips,etc"

And about 8:12,read 8:19 it clearly says its about self defense

8:19:"If you [disbelievers] seek the victory - the defeat has come to you. And if you desist [from hostilities], it is best for you; but if you return [to war], We will return, and never will you be availed by your [large] company at all, even if it should increase; and [that is] because Allah is with the believers."

"The hadith said the Prophet(saw) had been made victorious with terror"

And on the hadith read its context,yes Hadith has context too,sayings on this hadith is listed below:

Volume 004, Book 052, Hadith Number 220

Narrated By Abu Huraira : Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

I dont know why this "arab" not quote it whole,but I will leave it at you all to decide.

"Muhammad(SAW) also said that I have been helped with terror"

After looking at the Arabic text, the translation is done completely wrong. The Arabic word is ruebay, which DOES NOT mean terror but AWE. I’ve attached the original Arabic text (see bottom of post) and put a box around two words, which mean ‘helped with awe.’

If you lookup the word Awe in an English dictionary, you will learn that it means:


1. a feeling of reverential respect mixed with fear or wonder."they gazed in awe at the small mountain of diamonds"

1. inspire with awe."they were both awed by the vastness of the forest"
The real translation of the Hadith is "I've been helped with awe" and the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was talking about himself personally not about Islam.

The ruebay used by the Prophet was that of his character, his morals, his spirituality, his promoting the virtues of forgiveness.

You cannot simply take one quote of what he said and base your suppositions on Islam's victory. You need to look at the life of the prophet and see how he behaved with people. He did not terrorize or coerce them into becoming Muslim. The prophet saw Islam spread the most after the treaty of Hudaibiya (Peace between Mecca and Medina) and this treaty was breached by the Meccans. Even after Mecca was conquered, a general amnesty was declared. So Islam does not owe it's success to terrorism.

I urge you to take basic study of Islam under consideration. Here are some resources that are unbiased and will help you formulate a solid understanding. Any library in North America can help you obtain them:

These contradictions are too clear to be refuted..
And there is NO,literally NO explanation for these refutations and we caught them out bad.

And even today people are saying Christianity is dying yet Christians disagree and go to tell us lies like "Christians are still more than Muslims"

This now has also led me to a debate, I'll use this blog as a helpful tool and ask questions if I cannot answer some questions.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 ... 13

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube