Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - QuranSearchCom

Pages: 1 ... 174 175 176 177 [178] 179 180 181 182
I think so. If you've said your debt, you are no longer a debtor. So, I think that executed criminals will go straight into heaven.

Peace be upon you sister in Islam,

The specific sin that the person got punished for in life will not be punished for it in the lifeafter.

As to entering Heaven or Hell, this all depends on the other things that he/she has done and accomplished, and of course most of all, whether he was a Believer or not.  It's a complex thing that only Allah Almighty will sort out with His Divine Mercy and Justice.  Sin, by itself, is not static or fixed.  Some people commit sin because they have evil selves.  Others commit sins because they themselves are victims of their surroundings.  Also, the age of the person and their status and the reasons that led them to sin are all factored in.  Only Allah Almighty will sort this out with His Divine Mercy and Justice.

To better understand this, please visit: (see especially Main Sections #1 and #6).  I've explained this in details from the Glorious Quran and the Hadiths.

I hope this helps.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah


Why is Abraham considered the "first" Muslim?

Peace be upon you 'Pip Power',

Welcome to the blog.  Insha'Allah (if Allah Almighty is Willing), you will find the Truth of Islam here.  Ameen.

In regards to your question, it is Adam, not Abraham, who is called the first Muslim.  Islam started when mankind was created.  Please know that Islam is deeply rooted even in your Scriptures.  The original Faith is Islam, and the Believers' titles were Muslims, even in your Scriptures.  Please visit the following links for proofs:,80.msg198.html#msg198

The video in the second link is by a Rabbi who explains how the original believers in the Bible were called Muslims, and how Islam was the original Faith's title as well.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

In the Bible / Re: Marrying your children???
« on: September 19, 2012, 03:52:07 PM »
Peace be upon you Jim,

Do you honestly believe that putting someone like Jesus Christ on the cross for 3 hours only, - a person who was able to fast for 40 days without eating anything, - and expect him to die?

And again, the NT is clear that Christ was ALIVE in the tomb.  Listen to the debate, and please respond to Dr. Zakir Naik's points, directly.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

What does this mean?

As'salamu Alaikum dear brothers and sisters in Islam,

Brother Egyptian, you're welcome :).

As to brother 'Final Overture', it serves to prove that there is a lot more to just what we have from a cananized Bible.  There is a lot more to the history and personality of Jesus Christ, and a lot more to his personal life.  In the current Bible of today, there is almost virtually nothing about him when he was young, a teenager, or even when he was a young man throughout all of his years of twenties.  All of this is missing.  And even during his years when he was in his thirties, we have very little information.

I hope this helps, insha'Allah (if Allah Almighty is Willing).

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Peace be upon you Everyone,

Check out this article:  There is a new discovered gospel that claims that Mary, most likely Mary Magdalene, was Jesus' actual wife.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

In Islam / Re: Allah blesses women
« on: September 17, 2012, 04:05:11 PM »
Every muslim should find out for him/herself what islam really mean; and what it means to be muslim.

Every muslim women must ask, herself and allah, if being muslim means getting half a man's share;

The inheritance of the woman is actually more than fair for her, and it was designed by Allah Almighty to give her protection against the harsh and unforgiving world back then.  The woman's inheritance and dowry for marriage are her money, and she can choose to not share a single dollar with anyone if she chooses.  It is the husband's 100% responsibility to provide for her.  In fact, in Islam, the man is responsible for:

1-  His parents.
2-  His wife.
3-  His children until they become grown ups.
4-  His widowed sisters.
5-  His divorced sisters after their maintanence from their former husbands ends.

Him being obligated to spend on any and all of the mentioned people, above, justifies him getting double the woman in inheritance.  In fact, any of the people mentioned above could take him to court and have the court force him to pay.

being rendered being half mentally adept; having to share a husband; etc.

When Allah Almighty put the Law of four men to be witnesses against any woman charged with lewdness, and for two women being equivalent to one man in financial contracts, Allah Almighty wanted to ensure:

1-  The full and uncompromised integrity of the situation.
2-  The highest standards and most justice.

Men back then, and even today throughout the third-world countries, are far more intelligence and experience when dealing with financial transactions, and tradings between goods and money, and money with money, and goods with goods than women.  Women are more experienced in raising children, cooking, milking, shaving the wool and making pillows and blankets and sweaters (clothes) with them, and cleaning.  The Financial world is something they're not experienced in, and mathematics tend to be very confusing for all humans.  You need lots of experience to deal with mathematics and financial transactions and dealings.  Hence, one woman, in general, wasn't enough back then, and even today in many of the under-developed countries, where women don't go to schools and spend most of their adult lives in marriages and raising children.  This is true in both Muslim and non-Muslim countries.  This is why Allah Almighty Said "to remind or correct (tuthakkir) one of them the other".

Let us look at the Noble Verse in full context and in great details:

Noble Verse 2:282 "O ye who believe! When ye deal with each other, in transactions involving future obligations in a fixed period of time, reduce them to writing; let a scribe write down faithfully as between the parties: let not the scribe refuse to write: as God Has taught him, so let him write. Let him who incurs the liability dictate, but let him fear His Lord God, and not diminish aught of what he owes. If they party liable is mentally deficient, or weak, or unable Himself to dictate, let his guardian dictate faithfully, and get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her. The witnesses should not refuse when they are called on (For evidence). Disdain not to reduce to writing (your contract) for a future period, whether it be small or big: it is juster in the sight of God, More suitable as evidence, and more convenient to prevent doubts among yourselves but if it be a transaction which ye carry out on the spot among yourselves, there is no blame on you if ye reduce it not to writing. But take witness whenever ye make a commercial contract; and let neither scribe nor witness suffer harm. If ye do (such harm), it would be wickedness in you. So fear God; For it is Good that teaches you. And God is well acquainted with all things. If ye are on a journey, and cannot find a scribe, a pledge with possession (may serve the purpose). And if one of you deposits a thing on trust with another, let the trustee (faithfully) discharge his trust, and let him Fear his Lord conceal not evidence; for whoever conceals it, - his heart is tainted with sin. And God knoweth all that ye do."


The actualy brain itself is not the point here.  This is what the ridiculous Islamophobes claim with their lies.  Otherwise, are we to believe that THREE MEN AREN'T INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO TESTIFY AGAINST A PROSTITUTE?  Why must we have four men?  It's the standards and the integrity and the assurance of justice and fair dealing that matters here.  It's not about the intelligence of the individual.

If allah could bless marium with a son immaculately, how much more can he bless you as a woman? With allah, anything is possible. We, as women don't have to submit to men. Only submit to allah. He could if he wanted give you a child without using a man's sperm; give you food in abundance without your having ever worked a day in your life or having been someone's wife. Amin.

I am not really sure what agenda or point or perspective you're trying to push here.  It is not an insult for the woman to be a mother and a wife.  It is not an insult for the woman to breast feed her child for two mandatory years.  It is not an insult for the woman to be married to a man and get pregnant from him and raise a healthy and righteous society.  After all, IT WAS MY MOTHER, NOT MY FATHER, WHO RAISED ME!  SHE WAS THE ONE WHO ALSO HELPED ME WITH ALL OF MY HOMEWORKS.  She was the one who also made sure that I don't stay too late playing outside, and don't stray too far when playing with the other kids.  My father was busy working.  I see that as an honor for my mother, not an insult.  Only the destructive faminists of today, who are mostly divorced and lesbian losers, push such evil ideologies and agendas, which destroy marriages, and make women of today even far stupider than what they already are from all of the garbage that is fed to them.

Muslims like to ask christians questions, to question christianity. But, muslims should question muslims about islam. Question the dictatorship. Question the discrimination. Question the bloodshed. Question the poverty. Question the characters of the muslim scholars.

All questions are welcomed.  The more you ask, the more we'll prove to you that Islam is the ONE AND ONLY SOLUTION for all of mankind and this lost humanity, insha'Allah (if Allah Almighty is Willing).

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

In the Bible / Re: Marrying your children???
« on: September 16, 2012, 11:18:41 PM »
Your rejection of #3 by claiming that it is a "false man-made prophecy" is simply assuming the point in question, whereas the verse itself could very well mean that it is God's judgment on that couple that they will have no children together.  It doesn't say that they couldn't have children from other people.  At least, not unless you presuppose what you want to prove - which is what you've done.

I live in the USA.  The Jewish community, nation wide, is among the most sexually open ones in the nation.  It's so bad here that Rabbies are said to have secret group sex with many of their followers.  Now, I also grant you that there are many pious Jews in the USA and around the world.

But let's be real here.  You mean to tell me that if Kim Kardashian, a former porn star and a Jew who was made famous in the US' media, slept with her sister's husband, then she'll become barren?  Or if her brother sleeps with her other brother's wife, then they'll become barren?  Leviticus 20:21 is not just speaking about GOD-fearing Jews here.  It's also speaking about loose and ill-raised ones like the example I gave.  It's talking about if a brother has sex with his brother's wife.  This is something that is never approved for pious people to do, as you know.

As to Jesus resurrecting from the dead point, again, please do listen to the debate.  Dr. Zakir proved that the translation is actually "raised", and the word doesn't mean coming back to life from death.  Even the pastor that was debating him was silenced on many of the points that were given by Dr. Zakir Naik.  It's not as simple and shallow as you think.  Like you, I had my doubts, but when I saw the debate, I was really amazed.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

In the Bible / Re: Marrying your children???
« on: September 16, 2012, 05:54:58 PM »
On your site, on the page,, you state:

"The Bible in Leviticus 20:21 allows for parents to marry their children!"

And you reference Leviticus 20:21 to support your bold assertion,

If a man marries his brother's wife, it is an act of impurity;
he has dishonored his brother. They will be childless.
(Lev 20:21)

But this says nothing about parents marrying children.  So where do you get the idea that the Bible in Leviticus 20:21 allows parents to marry their children?

Peace be upon you Laloumen,

Welcome to the board.  Let us read the verse in question again:

If a man marries has sex with his brother's wife, it is an act of impurity;
he has dishonored his brother. They will be childless.

(Leviticus 20:21)

In the article,, I discussed the following possible meanings for "They will be childless":

1-  Either this is a false man-made scientific statement, like many of the false scientific statements, in the Bible, where they it says that it is biologically and physiologically impossible for the man and the woman in this case to impregnate the woman and have a child.  Visit:

2-  Or GOD Almighty in this verse rejects or invalidates the parent-child relationship in this situation if it were to happen.

3-  Or it is a false man-made "prophecy" and lie on GOD Almighty's Holy Mouth by giving a promise that the man and the woman will become physiologically barren, - unable to ever produce children ever again, - whether with each others or seperate with other people.

If interpretation or meaning #2 is valid, then this means that nothing on earth could stop the biological father from marrying his biological daughter, or for the biological mother to marry her biological son - should she divorce or become a widow.

You have sinned.  But, to make things very simple, forgiveness is not possible in Islam

I have neither sinned, nor is your knowledge about Islam correct.  Go read the Glorious Quran and see the 100s of Noble Verses that speak about GOD Almighty's Forgiveness and Mercy.  Visit:

You need a Savior!  You need to turn from your sin to the Lord, because in Him there is forgiveness, through His death on the cross on your behalf.  In this way, God is both merciful and just.

Watch Dr. Zakir Naik's debate with Pastor Rukni on "Did Jesus Christ ACTUALLY DIE on the cross?".  Dr. Zakir thoroughly demonstrated and proved from the Bible's New Testament that Christ never died on the cross, nor was he ever resurrected.  In fact, the word resurrected was never even mentioned in the NT.  It says Jesus was raised, which means he never died.  Watch the debate and see all of the NT verses that Dr. Zakir Naik gave that thoroughly demonstrated and proved this:

But, if you persist in rejecting Jesus Christ, you reject the only way of salvation.  And God will not forgive your sins and there is nothing you can do to earn His forgiveness.  In rejecting the only way of salvation, you reject salvation and condemn yourself to an eternity in hell.

I am afraid you're the one who rejects GOD Almighty and His servant and creation and Prophet and Messenger, Jesus Christ, with your idol worship of Jesus and polytheism.  Visit:

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

So Islam doesn't believe that John was Elija reincarnate?

What about the natural cycle of life and death? What about viruses that die then reproduce themselves? What about the fact that we turn into soil and that soil feeds plants and those plants feed people? So we literally evolve physically from one state of life to another.

As'salamu Alaikum sister in Islam,

No, we do not believe that John the Baptist (Yahya, peace be upon him) was Elija reincarnate.  The Bible's New Testament also doesn't say what you said above either.

Now as to evolution, I am afraid you have it all misunderstood.  Evolution isn't feeding your dead body as nutritients to soil, so in return the soil can feed it to plants, and in turn other humans eat it.  This is a life and death life cycle, and the Glorious Quran talked about it.  Allah Almighty Said in the Glorious Quran that He brings the dead from the living and brings the living from the dead.  Visit:

Also, visit:, and go to Main Section #1.

Now in regards to evolution, there is a difference between our bodies going through changes but keeping their main human properties preserved, and the claim that we were fish or monkies and then evolved into more intelligent animals.  Islam 100% agrees with the first statement that I mentioned, which is that our bodies went through changes, but kept their human properties preserved.  We weren't animals and evolved into humans.  Our sizes used to be much greater than what they are now.  Both Islam and Science have claimed this and proven this, respectively.  Please visit: (Because of the increase in earth's size, and the increase in its gravity as a result, our sizes decreased as a result of the gravity increase).

There are many proofs for the changes in our sizes.  A personal example for you and me is the removal of the wisdom teeth.  Our Jaws used to be bigger and broader than what they are now, and there was enough realestate for all of the teeth to grow in it.  But today, since our bodies are decreasing in size, our jaws also decreased, and as a result, our teeth became over crowded.  This is why many people end up removing their wisdom teeth, because the over crowding of the teeth causes pain on the teeths' nerves.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

A woman is like a mother to us when she breast-feeds us, because her milk becomes part of our bodies. This is according to islamic thinking. So, based on that premise, I have this question: are cows like mothers to us if we drink their milk, because their milk becomes part of our bodies?

Cows are animals.  We are humans.  They do not become our foster mothers.  And according to the Glorious Quran, the maximum age for breast feeding is up to two years old.  See the following articles:  (A Scientific Miracle about the formation of milk in cattle)

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Now let's see if there is any muslim who can answer my question in the first thread that I started...

I already answered it in the post where I talked about the 24,000 scroll fragments, above.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

A muslim man has 3 wives and children with all. Then he divorces one wife and gets custody of the children aged 10 and 11. He has a house with each wife. So now, do the children live alone in one house while the father is spending time with one of the other wives? Or does he ask one wife to look after the children? Or does he get someone to look after them? Or does he take them with him when he goes to visit the other wives? What are the rulings on a situation like this.

The husband doesn't always have to have a single seperate house for each wife.  I don't think this is a madatory rule, even though this is how the Prophet, peace be upon him, had it with his wives.  So to answer you question, it all depends on the way the relationship is between the husband and the wives, and the wives and the children of the other women.  They can make those arrangements.  And in all cases, he and everyone in the family must always be fair and just as much as they can:

"O ye who believe! stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to God, even as against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for God can best protect both..... (The Noble Quran, 4:135)"

"God doth command you to render back your Trusts to those to whom they are due; And when ye judge between man and man, that ye judge with justice: Verily how excellent is the teaching which He giveth you! For God is He Who heareth and seeth all things. (The Noble Quran, 4:58)"

".....Help ye one another in righteousness and piety, but help ye not one another in sin and rancour: fear God: for God is strict in punishment. (The Noble Quran, 5:2)"

"O ye who believe! stand out firmly for God, as witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and fear God. For God is well-acquainted with all that ye do. (The Noble Quran, 5:8 )"

"God does not forbid you from showing kindness and dealing justly with those who have not fought you about religion and have not driven you out of your homes. God loves just dealers. (The Noble Quran, 60:8 )"

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Wouldn't it be sunnat for you to marry a 9-year-old? Don't sheiks and madressa teachers teach muslims to follow and try to imitate the prophet for great reward?

Very good question, sister Antiaparteid.  A "Sunna" is an action that the Prophet of Islam, peace be upon him, have either done himself, or have spoken about.  The Sunna is not something that is mandatory to be followed in Islam.  It's almost always optional.  Furthermore, like I mentioned in the article, the marriage of the Prophet of Islam most likely happened before the Revelation of the Noble Verses that I mentioned in the article.

As to getting rewards for following the Sunna, only when it's not in conflict with the Glorious Quran.  There are Sunnas that were invalidated by the Glorious Quran.  An example of this is the divorce by Zihar (a man telling his wife you are to me like my mother).  This was the pagan Arabs' way of divorce before Islam.  During the early days of Islam, it was practiced, and the Prophet even approved it.  Latter, the Glorious Quran forbade it.

The Glorious Quran is really the Ultimate, sister.  The Sunna that agrees with the Glorious Quran is valid.  Otherwise, its law and/or practice had been invalidated.

I hope this helps, insha'Allah.  As always, everyone is welcomed to share their views and opinions and criticisms.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

its not pro-ghafi that did it but the same people they've armed to revolt against ghadafi, the libyan government are just looking for a cover.

Why would the Libyan government do that?  What benefit will it bring to kill the US Embassador in their country, when he is living under their protection.  Look at the timing of the bombing.  Right after the 9/11 anniversary when the American nations' emotions are high?!  It has the zionists' finger prints all over it!  And it is no secret, by the way, that Israel declared it support to Gathafi during the war.  So it shouldn't surprise anyone that they now support the pro-gathafi thugs, and even have many mosad and other Israeli fighters injected in them.  After all, did not the libyans call for the expulsion of all Jews from Libya?  This means that the Libyan nation, like many of the Arab nations, has native Jews in it.  So it's very easy to inject mosads and spies among the pro-gathafi thugs.

Osama Abdallah

PLEASE POST THIS ON EVERY BLOG YOU CAN GET YOUR HANDS ON!  You can remove my site below if you want.

Let's analyze some facts here:

1-  The film was released few days before the 9/11 anniversary.

2-  The film was made by an Israeli.

3-  The American Embassador to Libya, WHO IS A CHRISTIAN AMERICAN, gets blown away.

I smell a zionist-mosad conspiracy here.  The emotions were ALREADY HIGH on the 9/11 anniversary.  So let's explode it by killing the non-Jew embassador.  Get it?

9/11 was an inside job! WTC BUILDINGS FELL AT SIX SECONDS EACH! This
is a controlled demonlision FREE FALL WITH NO RESISTANCE. 9/11 was a
zionist inside job. Melted metal that was consistent with explosion
melting were found in all of the buildings' metal foundations after
the collapses. The buildings were also hit by REMOTE-CONTROLLED
airplanes from WTC 7. This is also why this building was brought down
by controlled demolision. The pentagon was also hit by a drone or
missile, and no airplane was found in the PA field. Muslims HAD
NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11. PERIOD. It was the sub-humans who rule this
country that did it. The zionists are worse than satan himself!! Hell
is their final abode!


Some of the Glorious Quran's beautiful teachings:

".....Help ye one another in righteousness and piety, but help ye not
one another in sin and rancour: fear God: for God is strict in
punishment.  (The Noble Quran, 5:2)"

"O ye who believe! stand out firmly for God, as witnesses to fair
dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to
wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and
fear God. For God is well-acquainted with all that ye do.  (The Noble
Quran, 5:8 )"

"Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress
limits; for God loveth not transgressors.  (The Noble Quran, 2:190)"

"But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline
towards peace, and trust in God: for He is One that heareth and
knoweth (all things).  (The Noble Quran, 8:61)"

"God does not forbid you from showing kindness and dealing justly with
those who have not fought you about religion and have not driven you
out of your homes. God loves just dealers.  (The Noble Quran, 60:8 )"

"Let there be no compulsion in religion:  Truth stands out clear from
error:  whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the
most trustworthy handhold, that never breaks.  And Allah heareth and
knoweth all things.  (The Noble Quran, 2:256)"

The ones who did it were Pro Gathafi zionist thugs who wanted to create enmity between the NATO and the Libyan nation in Libya. Don't blame the entire nation for it! It was no more than a shoulder missile fired from a thug's shoulder into the embasy. The unfortunate happened. But don't blame the entire nation for it. The nation of Libya didn't do it. it wasn't a declaration of war, for instance. And the government of Libya apologized


Pages: 1 ... 174 175 176 177 [178] 179 180 181 182

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube