Answering Christianity Research Center

Since the "epilepsy explanation" of Allah's revelation has not been rejected yet (see my older post), here is an interesting question:

do you accept that Ellen G. White (7th day adventist), whose case looks similar, but in the 19th century, also received her revelation from Allah?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inspiration_of_Ellen_White

Mr. Mokko,

Ignoring you is not an automatic concede to the validity of your arguments.  It's just that no one here really cares about these old lame and boring arguments that are presented by agnostics and atheists and Islamophobes.  The Glorious Quran is the Divine Miracle of Allah Almighty.  There are ample irrefutable Overwhelming Scientific Notions and Statements in the Holy Quran that I challenge you to refute.  The best you will ever do (because I've debated the likes of you before including the notorious agnostic Denis Giron) is cast doubts about the Noble Verses, or try to say something like "is it possible that it means something else".  The silencer to such lame and superficial arguments is not only in producing ample definitions, quotations from proverbs and sayings that even pre-date Islam, that demonstrate the meaning of the certain Noble Words in the Holy Quran using  encyclopedic Arabic dictionaries such as Lisan Al-Arab and others as I have thoroughly used, but the Numerical Miracles of the Holy Quran further prove the Holy Book's Divine Structure, and how every Word counts and was placed in its specific position for a Divine Reason.  The reader can visit: http://www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#links to begin to study the many Overwhelming Scientific Miracles in the Glorious Quran.  And the list is growing.

To make it abundantly clear to you, Mokko, I certainly believe in the following:

1-  Allah Almighty is the Absolute One and Sovereign LORD and Creator of the Universe.

2-  Prophet Muhammad is Allah Almighty's Messenger and Prophet.

3-  The Glorious Quran is the Divine Book and Word of Allah Almighty.

4-  Islam is the Divine Truth and Faith and Creed and Religion of Allah Almighty that He sent to mankind, and to restore the original Faith, which was called "Islam".

And as always Mokko, please feel free to speak you mind as free as you want, as long as the words are dictionary-approved, and I am sure you're a proper person yourself.  I just want to make it clear that me disagreeing with someone, even strongly, is not a sign or warning for them to be banned.  I don't operate like this.  I go after the arguments, and not the individuals.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

peace bro QuranSearchCom , Muslims never banged their heads, even so for minute ,on whether Christ was placed on the cross or not ,from the beginning of Islam , till the last few decades when the deviant Qadini sect , propagated that the swoon theory (that rare readers to the new testament suggest) ,could also be applied to the Quran...

The Qadiani sect banged the heads of Orthodox Muslims with such theory , the danger of such theory is not questioning a specific Hadith or a tradition ,but pervert the meaning of a noble verse ,that is why it must be exposed and refuted without tolerance.

As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,

Please pardon my ignorance in this, but do we have Hadiths that clearly spell out what happened to Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him?  I haven't read any Hadith on this.  But I also didn't research it hard enough either.

I hope my criticism is not offending anyone , but when it comes to the Quran,the matter is so serious.

Nothing offensive dear brother.  Feel free to speak your mind, freely.  This forum is for all brothers and sisters and non-Muslims to speak their minds, freely.  We're here to discuss and to get closer to the Truth, insha'Allah (if Allah Almighty is Willing).

Take care akhi (brother),
Osama Abdallah

Peace be upon you Jesus,

Please visit: http://www.answering-christianity.com/minimum_age_for_marriage.htm (What is the minimum age for marriage in Islam?).  In Main Section #6 in the article, I posted a debate that I had with a Christian regarding Noble Verse 65:4 that you mentioned.

In a nutshell, there is no specific magical number for minimum age for marriage in Islam, where one day younger makes the person prohibited to marry.  Rather, the Glorious Quran, in the Noble Verses that I provided in the article, makes it abundantly clear that

1- INFANTS
2- BABIES
3- CHILDREN
4- And even incapable teenagers who are not fully grown up based on what the current life requires

Are not permitted to marry. 

Here are the article's main sections:

1-  Children must reach ashuddah (full strength and growth) and adulthood.

2-  Children reaching "the age of marriage" in Noble Verse 4:6.

3-  Female-children becoming fataaya (young ladies) become ready to be "wed" (4:25).

4-  Wisdom and Knowledge from Allah Almighty came after ashuddah.

5-  What about Prophet Muhammad's marriage with 9-year old Aisha?

6-  What about Noble Verse 65:4?  Does it not allow marriage with children?  (A conversation between me and a Christian)

7-  Prophet Muhammad's advise to "O young grown-ups (shabab)" (يا معشر الشباب) for marriage.

Another article worth visiting is: http://www.answering-christianity.com/aisha.htm.  In it, you'll also see that Mary, peace be upon her, was as young as 11 when she had Jesus Christ.  This means that she was as young as 10 when she got pregnant.

But anyway, please read the first link I gave you.  You'll find your answers from the Glorious Quran, insha'Allah (if Allah Almighty is Willing).

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Your site inspires me. 

Thank you dear brother!  .

I'm not quite sure where you would get the presumption that Jesus coveted from these verses.

Peace be upon you pianoxtreme99,

I got it from the fact that Jesus Christ, according to the NT, was between GOD and satan for 40 days and 40 nights.  That's a lot of time for temptation.  And yes, while Christ, the Prophet of Allah Almighty, didn't commit the sins that satan wanted him to commit, but he still coveted, because it took him a very long time to overcome satan's temptation.  I don't know how you would feel if your wife was between you and another man for 40 days and 40 nights. 

What kind of a GOD is Jesus Christ, anyway, when the Bible clearly says that GOD Almighty can not be tempted.  Yet, Jesus was very badly tempted for 40 days and 40 nights by satan.

Jesus was not GOD Almighty, nor was he perfect.  He was a creation of GOD Almighty and he wasn't perfect.  He was GOD Almighty's Messenger and Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him and upon all of the Prophets and Messengers of GOD Almighty.  Ameen.

Answer to you: Jesus is the son of God, he does not sin nor desire sin; it is revolting to Him. For example, if you tempt me with a plate of manure, tempting me for a day, a week, 23 days or even 40 days isn't going to increase my desire to eat the plate of manure. Jesus was tempted to sin, but he did not covet after the sin. Again, Hebrews 4:15. According to the Bible, Christ was sinless and perfect.

You are clearly confused between being actually tempted, and someone trying to tempt you while you're not interested.  In order for you to be tempted, you have to have an interest or desire in the thing that you're being tempted on.  This is why Jesus Christ, because of his temptation, had "evil desires" in him, and felt spiritually "weak", and got very weak that Angels had to come down to spiritually "attend him".  And he's the same person who said that if your eye sins then pluck it out, and if your hand sins then cut it off and throw it away.  Yet, satan was able to scramble his desires for 40 days and 40 nights.  If that is not coveting, pianoxtreme99, then what is it then?  Please visit: http://www.answering-christianity.com/satanic_verses.htm.

Furthermore, in order for you to be tempted in something, you have to have a desire and wish of having it.  The Catholic Priests who supposedly stay virgins are constantly tempted to have sex (either with children, women or other men).  Many of them resist it and many of them fail and commit the sexual sin.  Those who failed failed because they already had the urge in them.   Temptation just simply paved the way for them to commit the sin.  But have they not had any desire in having sex (as humans we all have that desire) then they would not be tempted. 

To put it more simply and clearly for you, pianoxtreme99, I may be able to tempt you to have sex with a woman, because deep inside you you may be dying to have her, and we both may happen to know her in person, and she's single and she has an great interest in you, and in your head you'd be thinking about it, but I most definitely won't be able to tempt you to eat a rotten, dead and stinking cat that is laying on the side of a road, because you most certainly don't have that desire and urge to eat that disgusting thing.  Let alone you taking 40 days and 40 nights to think about it.  And Christ supposedly came from Heaven.  Therefore, nothing on this earth should tempt him for 1 second, let alone for 40 days and 40 nights.  My apologies to the reader if my example sounded disgusting.  I was just making a point that demonstrates the difference between actually being tempted, and someone trying to tempt you on something that you would never be tempted on.

Again, Hebrews 4:15. According to the Bible, Christ was sinless and perfect.

Frankly, I don't care what the man-made Hebrews 4:15 says, because the evidence is overwhelmingly clear about Jesus Christ being tempted very badly by satan, and him being between GOD and satan for 40 days and 40 nights.  Yes, to me that is coveting.  And coveting is one of the Bible Old Testament's moral sins.  Again, I am not saying that Christ was evil here.  But he certainly wasn't perfect nor sinless.  And most importantly, he is not, was not and can not be GOD Almighty, the Creator of the Universe.  Saying he was is a clear blasphemy.

Please visit: visit: http://www.answering-christianity.com/authors_gospels.htm to see how most of the Bible was not only written by ordinary men who were not chosen by GOD Almighty, but they were also mysterious and unknown authors.  The books were also written in unknown dates and unknown lands.  And they're full of contradictions as this link clearly demonstrates.

I hope this makes it abundantly clear for you.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Thank you bro Osama for uploading that debate...I haven't watched it yet ...

but as a matter of fact ,I find a surprising description " Dr. Zakir Naik where he thoroughly demonstrated from the Bible's New Testament that Jesus Christ was never crucified, nor did he ever rise from the dead."

with such description ,I guess I will have a critical word against Dr Naik's approach in that debate.
let me first watch it inshallah....

Thanx again brother Osama ,for your never ending efforts.

Assalamualaikom.

As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,

Yes, Dr. Zakir Naik demonstrated very thoroughly from the NT that Christ never died on the cross.  And he also never resurrected from the dead either.  IN fact, he challenged Christians to show one verse where it says that Jesus Christ resurrected from the dead.  Yes, that boldly.   I know, it sounds surprising, but seriously, the brother did an awsome job demonstrating his points.

May Allah Almighty bless you akhi.  Yes, please watch the debate .

Your brother,
Osama Abdallah

I insist that a refutation is different from threats (example of threat: "those who believe this website will be punished") and different from attacks (example of attack: "those who wrote this website are bad and stupid people")

As'salamu Alaikum,

Thanks for the post, Mustafa.  I first can easily tell that you're not just a non-Muslim, but you also seem to be an Islamophobe.  The reason I say this is because in the 10 or so years that I've been blogging and interacting with people online, I haven't run into a single Muslim who made threats to anyone who posed simple and honest questions on Islam.  Furthermore, our Holy Quran demands producing of proofs to claims (see Noble Verses 2:111, 28:75).  So, any query or question regarding Islam must not be dealt with in hostility.  On the contrary, Mokko (Mustafa), I've been to the website that you linked below, and I've seen lots of hostility and insults towards Islam and Muslims who post simple posts.  In fact, Ali Sina wished death upon all Muslims and said that no Muslim is innocent: http://www.answering-christianity.com/sina_kill_all_muslims.jpg.  So it's ok for Muslims to be oppressed and conspired against, but it's forbidden for them to respond to the evil that is plotting against them, according to Ali Sina.  I was also insulted many times before, and my posts were removed many times before on that website, becasue they did not want the reader to see the real Truth of the Islamic side.

You certainly will not be threatened here as well.  So, let's drop the garbage at once and be honest.  I know that the hateful Islamophobes are desperate to make Islam and Muslims look bad in anyway, shape or form.  Your silly attempt here is just a small example of this. 

Now to the core of your post, above.  I will thoroughly refute it for you, insha'Allah.  Just give me a couple of days, insha'Allah.

Take care and welcome to this board.  I ask Allah Almighty that you see the Truth of Islam someday.  Ameen.

Osama Abdallah

As'salamu Alaikum dear brothers and sisters,

The Old Testament declares in many places that Jesus Christ will never be killed, nor be crucified.  Please visit:

http://www.answering-christianity.com/isaiah_53.htm

http://www.answering-christianity.com/psalm_91.htm

http://www.answering-christianity.com/psalm_116_117_118.htm

For ample references and details.  Isaiah 53, Psalm 91 and Psalm 116, 117 and 118 have ample claims that Christ will never be harmed or killed.

Your brother,
Osama Abdallah