Author Topic: An Allegation Against Religion!  (Read 5369 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
An Allegation Against Religion!
« on: May 04, 2014, 05:42:43 PM »

 Some people have claimed that religion was created by some wise people to control people and to create fear in them so that they keep themselves away from sinful acts and learn to judge. In reality there is nothing called religion. I guess most of the socialists hold this opinion.

 How are we supposed to answer them??? Please help me


  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: An Allegation Against Religion!
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2014, 04:41:25 AM »
it seems like the topic got buried by some other topics.

Offline Sama

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: An Allegation Against Religion!
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2014, 09:49:35 AM »

Offline shabeer_hassan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: An Allegation Against Religion!
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2014, 02:29:53 AM »
The Qur'an is, indeed, a book that guides people to the way of
morality and virtue. In fact, it is the Qur'an, and the Qur'an alone,
which can claim the distinction of being a book which transformed a
society that was steeped in wine, debauchery and warfare into a
people who became the staunchest advocates and practitioners of
morality and virtue within a short span of just twenty- three years.
However, to any who has had even a cursory reading of the Qur'an, it
is clear that to say Muhammad (e) had written the Qur'an for the
cause of moral revivalism and had then attributed it to God is to say
something without any foundation.Observe the facts mentioned below:
One: There have been no two opinions about the fact that
Muhammad (e) was truthful. It is illogical, therefore, to assume that
such a one as he would then, in the name of moral revival, attribute a
blatant falsehood in the name of God. It is unbelievable that a person
who persevered for the cause of morality would then committ, for the
same cause, a gross immorality. What, indeed, can be a greater sin
than attributing lies in the name of God?
Two: The Qur'an itself has declared that the worst transgressor
is the one who invents lies in the name of the Lord Creator and the
one who writes something and then says that it is from God. “Who
can be more wicked than one who inventeth a lie against Allah,
or saith, ‘I have received inspiration,’ when he hath received
none, or (again) who saith, ‘I can reveal the like of what Allah
hath revealed’?” (6:93). If the Qur'an is, indeed, Muhammad’s own
work, then the ‘most wicked’ one mentioned in this verse must
necessarily be he himself. Will he have condescended to describe
himself as the “most wicked” and to preserve it in writing too?
Three: God has cursed those who write with their own hands
and then attribute it to God. “Then woe to those who write the Book
with their own hands, and then say: ‘This is from Allah’.” (2:79).
If the Qur'an is, indeed, the work of Muhammad (e), then this curse is
most applicable to him . Consider this : to makes one’s own composition;
then to proceed to curse one’s own self. Is this believable?
Four: The Qur'an is not a book that was revealed all at once.
The verses of the Qur'an were, in fact, revealed over a long period of
twenty- three years and, that too, under varying circumstances. Indeed,
in some cases, the verses of the Qur'an were revealed as a direct answer
to the questions posed by the people. There are, in the Qur'an, around
fifteen occasions wherein the verses which employ the style “they
ask thee (O Muhammad) concerning...” and “Say (O
Muhammad)...” have been used. It is evident from this that there
were occasions when the Prophet could not provide a satisfactory
answer to the questions of the people on a topic and that it was only
later, with the revelation of the verses of the Qur'an, that this became
possible. If the composition of the Qur'an was, indeed, the work of the
Prophet, who sought to bring about a moral revival, he would have
been able to answer the questions of the people as and when they
arose. For instance, if it was the Prophet’s intention to save the people
from the evils of drinking and gambling, he could have straightaway
declared them to be sinful.Instead, that was not done; without making
his own statement and he awaited the arrival of the divine revelation.
It was only after the revelation of the divine verses that he sought to
take action against these evils.
Five: There are certain Qur'anic verses which seek to correct
Prophet Muhammad (e). The verses of the Qur'an (80:1-10) which
criticized the action of the Prophet when he did not receive the blind
Abdulla bin Ummi Makthoom with warmth and respect owing to his
being engaged in discussion with the leaders of the Quraysh, are only
too well-known. In the Battle of Uhud wherein the Muslims had
suffered great losses, the Prophet too had received a number of
injuries. After the battle he had cursed some of the disbelievers and
had mentioned to himself thus, “How will a people, who injure their
own prophet, ever progress ?” Immediately was the verse of the
Qur'an, which sought to correct the Prophet, revealed : “Not for thee,
(but for Allah), is the decision: Whether He turn in mercy to
them, or punish them; for they are indeed wrong-doers.” (3:128)
If the Qur'an was really the composition of the Prophet, which he had
made for the moral transformation of the people, would there have
been verses in the Qur'an which criticized his own actions?

Offline MuslimBoy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: An Allegation Against Religion!
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2014, 12:34:05 PM »
:| Walaikum As-Salamu,

  Al-Jazeera May this helps.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2014, 12:57:04 PM by MuslimBoy »


What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube