Answering Christianity Research Center

Osama,doesn't the Prophet Muhammad's journey during Isra w miraj claim that he can preform miracles ? (Thus further supplementing the argument that he could've split the moon ?)

@AhmedFarooq My bad must've misread it. Btw do you think there are any scientific errors/contradictions in the Quran ? Cause so far i haven't found a reliable to source to claim there aren't. Just to many different interpretations.


@Osama Regards to the wife beating scenario. I'm confused is it actually beat or desert them ? The hadiths you added on previous articles.

Narrated Mu'awiyah al-Qushayri: "I went to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them.  (Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 11, Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah), Number 2139)"

Narrated Mu'awiyah ibn Haydah: "I said: Apostle of Allah, how should we approach our wives and how should we leave them? He replied: Approach your tilth when or how you will, give her (your wife) food when you take food, clothe when you clothe yourself, do not revile her face, and do not beat her.  (Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 11, Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah), Number 2138)"

 Isn't this some sort of contradiction ? If not then how come the majority of scholars have interpreted it to mean otherwise? (then again they say pokemon card games are haram)

I mean I'm in Kuwait but i just ticked either way haha.

@Abdullah I never claimed wikipedia is anti islamic. All i've said is it is swarming with anti islamic authors. Just check the Quran and science section and look at all the references and additions made by answering-islam

@Osama lol but the thing is atleast we're still muslim none the less. The naive are strolling through the fabrications on wikipedia thinking it's all legit and assuming their religion isn't right. i've been on that road and it hit me hard. i believe almost everyone on this site did hence why we're here. I think we could literally save millions of muslims just by a few corrections on wiki

Literally the first site in everyone's face whenever they search the internet is Wikipedia. The first source people rely on for information is Wikipedia.

In the light of all that. It is absolutely SWARMING with anti-islamics !!! Ranging from the science articles from the Earth's shape (which is the first evidence nearly all early doubting muslims check for and Maurice Bucille's book) to Child marriage regarding Aisha's age.

I think it's about time we took over those sensitive topics away from those Anti islamic guerrillas and their false,fabricated and distorted lies.

And clear out all those recycled refutations and implement the actual truth with sources from this website and many others.

How about we put down our metaphorical swords down for now (Akhi Abdullah i'm pointing at you lol) and do our Ummah a favour before we lose more and more muslims to atheism ?

THE IRONIC DELUSION IS THAT THESE CHRISTIAN/JEWS ARE TRYING TO INDUCE DOUBTING MUSLIMS INTO THEIR RELIGION WHICH IS THE SUN BEHIND ATHEISM EVEN BLOSSOMING IN THE FIRST PLACE HAHAHHAHAHA.  "oh no Christopher Columbus be careful you'll fall off the ends of the earth"

Due to my limited knowledge i can't obviously do this all on my own. So what do you guys think ?

@Abdullah not to come off the wrong foot but why stress so much time on research on Osama when you could be more productive making articles or sites refuting Wiikiislam / Rationalwiki / answering islam and answering muslims ? or make videos and refute youtubers such as the rationalizer ? 

hey guys from verses 9-12 Is it implying that the after the creation of the earth the Lamps were fashioned after it ?

and that animals and the mountains were equally put there at the same time for those who ask ?