Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sama

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 34
1
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Our new baby girl, Rahaf :)
« on: December 24, 2020, 05:01:20 AM »
Congratulations brother Osama

May Allah make her a source of happiness for you and your family and help you to raise her as a righteous Muslima  :)

2
Bismillah IR Rahmaan ir Raheem

Assalaamu Alaikum to all viewers

ALL ABOUT KNOWLEDGE

WE seek refuge with ALLAH against the accursed devils ,;

Take note and SHARE TO OTHERS

From AN NAWAAWI 40 Hadith

post number 6 on HADITH 17

"Verily, Allah has prescribed excellence ... "

"And even a sheep, if you show mercy to it, Allah has mercy on you." The Prophet (peace be upon him) repeated it twice. 1 In another hadith, the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said, "Whoever shows mercy, even while slaughtering a sparrow, Allah will have mercy on him on the Day ofResurrection."2

These are all aspects of slaughtering in the best manner possible, as ordered by the Prophet (peace be upon him) in this hadith.

The Mercy Found in Islamic Slaughtering

Al-Jumuah magazine reported that two professors, Professor Schultz and Hazim, "conducted an experiment to compare the Islamic slaughtering with the stunning required in the so-called humane slaughter." The results of their experiment were reported as follows:

Islamic Method: 1. During the first three seconds after

slaughtering, the EEG [electroencephalograph] did not record

any change, thus indicating that the animal did not feel any

pain during or immediately after the incision.

2. For the following three seconds, the EEG recorded a condition of deep sleep-unconsciousness. This is due to the large quantity of blood gushing out of the body.

3. After this total of six seconds, the EEG recorded zero level, showing no feeling of pain at all.

4. As the brain message (EEG) dropped to zero

level, the heart was still pounding and the body convulsing

vigorously (a reflex action of the spinal cord) driving

maximum blood out of the body.

Stunning: 1. The animals were apparently unconscious soon

after stunning but the EEG showed severe pain immediately

after stunning.

2. The heart of the stunned animal stopped beating earlier than the one slaughtered the Islamic way thus resulting in the retention of more blood in the meat.

The Significance of The Two Examples Mentioned in This Hadith

Al-Sanaani states that the Prophet (peace be upon him) stated the least imaginable examples that one would think of when thinking of ihsaan: even while killing an animal or a human one must exhibit ihsaan.

1 However, there may be a deeper reason as to why the Prophet (peace be upon him) explicitly mentioned these two examples.

3
Do you have a question?

Please write in in one paragraph because I have a feeling that you are trolling.
I wish I am wrong.

5
Assalamualaikum brother, how to respond to Christians missionary that said Allah that responsible for created Christianity by letting and misled the people to believe that the person being crucified as a substitute to Jesus appears to them like actually him until they confused and started to follow Christianity ?

The fact that the real problem is that enemies of Jesus tried to kill him. God protected his servant from their evil.

Christ-worshippers on the other hand applied pagan theories of atonement to this good prophet who used to ask them to worship his God alone.

The undeniable truth is that all previous prophets preached absolute monotheism.

Whether a prophet was killed or not is irrelevant.

People are expected to follow the footsteps of their prophets not to apply pagan theories of atonement to them.

It must. Muslims believe that Prophet Jesus is blessed not cursed as Christians claim.

There are many pre-Islamic references that shows how people used to believe that Prophet Jesus was saved by God:

"But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. I was another upon Whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the archons and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance.

And I subjected all their powers. For as I came downward, no one saw me. For I was altering my shapes, changing from form to form. And therefore, when I was at their gates, I assumed their likeness
. "
http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/2seth.html

In this work, Jesus is described as a prophet and not the son of God, while Paul is called "the deceived." Furthermore, the Gospel of Barnabas states that Jesus escaped crucifixion by being raised alive to heaven, while Judas Iscariot the traitor was crucified in his place.
(N.B: Some people doubt the authenticity of this gospel.)

https://www.truthorfiction.com/gospel-of-barnabas/
https://www.barnabas.net/



The Cerinthians and later the Basilidians, for example, who were among the first of the early Christian communities, denied that Jesus was crucified...The Carpocratians, another early Christian sect, believed that it was not Jesus who was crucified, but another in his place

The first century scholar Basilides بازيليد and his followers, the Basilidians. They believed that Prophet Jesus was saved from the crucifixion. The beliefs of Basilides matter because he was living very close to the time of the disciples, and there are even traditions that he got these teachings from disciples of Jesus such as Peter.

https://www.manyprophetsonemessage.com/2017/06/30/the-early-christians-who-believed-jesus-was-saved-from-crucifixion/
https://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/the_crucifixion_hoax_2.htm

Christian historians about the era of "Justinian I" 527 to 565 AD:


It's a book by a Christian historian for his fellow Christ-worshippers. Muslims have no business here.

The Christian historian educates his fellow Christ-worshippers that the doctrine of the whole Egypt was that Jesus was saved from crucifixion.

6
Your claim is baseless. Knowing what scandal awaited him in front of his guests, and what ill-treatment awaited these guests from his own people, Lot was troubled on their account.The woeful day soon started when his people rushed towards him. They were impelled by their desires, rushing like one who has lost self-control. This was the reason for the distress Lot felt on his guests’ account.
 
When Lot looked at his people coming hurriedly towards his home, intent on abusing him and his guests, he tried to arouse their upright nature and direct them to the opposite sex with whom healthy nature finds pleasure. He was even ready to give his daughters in marriage to those frenzied people to satisfy their maddening desires in a clean, pure way.  All the connotations of purity,psychological and physical, are meant here. Lot’s daughters would provide a proper, sound and natural way for the satisfaction of sexual desire, arousing healthy feelings as well. It is a situation of complete purity, natural as well as moral and religious. Moreover, they are physically purer. The will of the Creator has provided a clean, pure place for the new emerging life.

Lot also tried to appeal to their fear of God, and their sense of propriety in providing hospitality to one’s guests.

---
الَ يقَوْمِ هَـؤُلاءِ بَنَاتِى هُنَّ أَطْهَرُ لَكُمْ

(He said: "O my people! Here are my daughters (the women of the nation), they are purer for you...'') This was his attempt to direct them to their women, for verily the Prophet is like a father for his nation. Therefore, he tries to guide them to that which is better for them in this life and the Hereafter. This is similar to his statement to them in another verse,
أَتَأْتُونَ الذُّكْرَانَ مِنَ الْعَـلَمِينَ - وَتَذَرُونَ مَا خَلَقَ لَكُمْ رَبُّكُمْ مِّنْ أَزْوَجِكُمْ بَلْ أَنتُمْ قَوْمٌ عَادُونَ

(Go you in unto the males of the nation, and leave those whom Allah has created for you to be your wives Nay, you are a trespassing people!)
26:165-166
---
Maududi:
By "my daughters" Prophet Lot might have meant either of the two things.
He might have referred to the daughters of the community as "ray daughters" because the relationship of a Prophet to his people is as of a father to his children.
But it is also possible that he aught have meant by this his own daughters.
Anyhow this could not have been an offer of adultery, for the succeeding sentence "..these are purer for you" leaves no room for such a misunderstanding. This makes it quite obvious that Prophet Lot admonished them in this way so as to turn them to the females for the lawful gratification of their sexual desires instead of seeking unnatural ways.

http://www.quran-wiki.com/ayat.php?sura=11&aya=78

7
1-Ibn Kharrash accused him, he said:
كذاب متروك يضع الحديث
[Liar, his narrations are abandoned, a fabricator.]
Ibn Kharrash is `Abdul-Rahman bin Yusuf bin Kharrash, he is a Rafidhi.
From his students is ibn `Uqdah who is also a Rafidhi.
The author of Lisan al-Meezan says about him:
بعد هذا فما انتفع بعلمه فلا عتب على حمير الرافضة
[After this, he never benefited from his knowledge, but there is no reproach for the donkeys of the Rafidhah.]
And this Rafidhi’s opinions are rejected as the Rafidhah themselves are liars, and this man weakened narrations  such as “We do not give inheritance, all we leave behind is Sadaqah.”   Although it is authentic and with many chains, he accused one of the  main reliable narrators (Malik bin Uways) of fabricating it, so he is a  hypocrite.

2- They reported from Ibn Ma`een that he said:
كان حفص بن سليمان وأبو بكر بن عياش من أعلم الناس بقراءة عاصم وكان حفص أقرأ من أبي بكر وكان أبو بكر صدوقا وكان حفص كذابا
[Hafs bin Sulayman and Abu Bakr bin  `Ayyash were the most knowledgeable of people in the recitation of  `Asim, Hafs was better than Abu Bakr at it but Abu Bakr was trustworthy  and Hafs was a liar.]
The one who narrated the above is Ibn  Mihraz Ahmad bin Muhammad al-Baghdadi and he is from the weaker  students, so what he reports is not acceptable if it conflicts with the  major students of the man.
As for the reliable and best students of  ibn Ma`een such as `Uthman bin Sa`eed al-Darimy and abu Qudamah  al-Sarkhasi, they reported from him that he said:
ليس بثقة
[Not relied upon.]
In Tareekh Baghdad we read from the reliable narrators the following:
علي بن الحسين بن حيان قال وجدت في كتاب  أبي بخط يده قال أبو زكريا يعني يحيى بن معين زعم أيوب بن متوكل قال أبو  عمر البزاز أصح قراءة من أبي بكر بن عياش وأبو بكر أوثق من أبي عمر
[`Ali bin al-Husayn bin Hayyan said: I  found in my father’s book, in his own handwriting that he said: abu  Zakariyah Yahya bin Ma`een, Ayyub bin al-Mutawakkil stated, abu `Umar  al-Bazzaz (Hafs) has better recitation than Abu Bakr bin `Ayyash, and  Abu Bakr is more reliable than abu `Umar.]
الليث بن عبيد أنه قال : سمعت يحيى بن  معين يقول : أبو عمر البزاز صاحب القراءة ليس بثقة ، هو أصح قراءة من أبي  بكر بن عياش ، وأبو بكر أوثق منه
[al-Layth bin `Ubayd that he said: I  heard Yahya bin Ma`een say: abu `Umar al-Bazzaz (Hafs) is a man of  recitation, not reliable, his recitation is better than Abu Bakr bin  `Ayyash, and Abu Bakr is more reliable.]
So notice how there is no mention of him saying “Liar”.

3- If, for the sake of the argument, we would accept Ibn  Mihraz narration from Ibn Maieen, which is NOT authentic;
Lying in the (Arabic) language may refer to "the error".
 Ibn Hibban - may God have mercy on him - said: “And the people of Hijaz call the error a lie.” [13] Ibn Hajar said in the tarjamah of Bard Mawla Saeed bin Al-Musayyib: "Ibn Habban" said in "Al-Thiqat": "Some of the thiqat (trustworthy) can make mistakes and the people of Al-Hijaz call the error a lie", I said: - That is, Ibn Hajar -: This means the words of his master: Do not lie to me, as Ikrama lied to Ibn Abbas - may God be pleased with them. [14]

Lane's lexicon:



فالكذب في اللغة قد يطلق على الخطأ قال ابن حبان – رحمه الله - :" وأهل الحجاز يسمون الخطأ كذباً "[13] وقال ابن حجر في ترجمة برد مولى سعيد بن المسيب :" قال ابن حبان في الثقات :" كان من الثقات كان يخطيء ، وأهل الحجاز يسمون الخطأ كذباً ، قلت : - أي ابن حجر - : يعني قول مولاه : لا تكذب علي كما كذب عكرمة على ابن عباس – رضي الله عنهما " [14].
--
انظر على سبيل المثال تاج العروس للزبيدي ولسان العرب لابن منظور وتهذيب اللغة للأزهري وغيرها
قال ابن منظور رحمه الله تعالى في لسان العرب 1/709 : وفي حديث صلاة  الوتر كذب أبو محمد ( رضي الله تعالى عنه ) أي أخطأ ؛ سماه كذبا لأنه يشبهه  في كونه ضد الصواب كما أن الكذب ضد الصدق ، وإن افترقا من حيث النية  والقصد لأن الكاذب يعلم أن ما يقوله كذب ، والمخطىء لا يعلم ، وهذا الرجل  ليس بمخبر ، وإنما قاله باجتهاد أداه إلى أن الوتر واجب ، والاجتهاد لا  يدخله الكذب وإنما يدخله الخطأ ، وأبو محمد ( رضي الله عنه ) صحابي واسمه  مسعود بن زيد .
وقد استعملت العرب الكذب في موضع الخطأ ، وأنشد بيت الأخطل : كذبتك  عينُك أم رأيت بواسط ٍ , وقال ذو الرمة : وما في سمعه كذب , وفي حديث عروة ،  قيل له : إن ابن عباس ( رضي الله عنهما ) يقول إن النبي صلى الله عليه  وسلم لبث بمكة بضع عشرة سنة ، فقال : كذب ، أي أخطأ .
ومنه قول عمران لسمرة ( رضي الله تعالى عنهما ) حين قال : المغمى عليه  يصلي مع كل صلاة صلاة ً حتى يقضيها ، فقال : كذبتَ ولكنه يصليهن معا ، أي  أخطأت َ .انتهى من لسان العرب----


4- All the scholars and Imams of Rijal  and Hadith, such as al-Hakim, ibn `Adi, ibn al-Jawzi, al-Bayhaqi, abu  Hatim, abu Zur`ah, Ahmad bin Hanbal, al-Nasa’ee, al-Jawzajani, ibn  Hajar, al-Dhahabi, al-Saji, ibn al-Madeeni, al-Bukhari ect…
When they talked about Hafs’s narrations  they said that he was either acceptable or weak or abandoned or  unreliable or that they avoided writing what he narrates, not one of  them said the man was a liar or fabricator.
https://www.twelvershia.net/2013/12/04/quran-has-a-shia-chain-of-transmission/
https://www.islamweb.net/en/fatwa/314071/criticism-of-hafs-as-a-weak-reporter-of-hadeeth

In conclusion;
It is established that he  is weak in narration and this is agreed upon,
As for him being a liar or fabricator, this is not accepted.

8
So, the word Anaam is singular but its meaning is collective-plural. Both are grammatically correct. It doesn't refer specifically to male cattle but it's a generic term. From the contexts, it's quite clear that both Ayat refer to female Anaam.

9
Dr. V. Abdur Rahim (author of "Madinah books") says, "The ismu jinsin jam"iyyun is used both as feminine singular and as masculine singular." Then he gives example of Nakhl (date palm) as used in [54:20] and [69:7].

Ismu jinsin jam"iyyun is the generic plural noun which refers to all the members of a particular group / species.

قال ابن عاشور في التحرير والتنوير:
وإفراد ضمير الأنعام في قوله تعالى: مِمَّا فِي بُطُونِهِ. {النحل: 66}. مراعاة لكون اللفظ الأنعام مفردا لأن اسم الجمع لفظ مفرد، إذ ليس من صيغ الجموع، فقد يراعى اللفظ فيأتي ضميره مفردا، وقد يراعى معناه فيعامل معاملة الجموع كما قال في آية سورة المؤمنين: وَإِنَّ لَكُمْ فِي الْأَنْعَامِ لَعِبْرَةً نُسْقِيكُمْ مِمَّا فِي بُطُونِهَا.  {المؤمنون: 21}.

10
Praise be to Allah. His Love and Peace be upon Syedna Muhammad after whom there is no prophet & upon His Family & Companions

Is he a Muslim ?
Beliefs of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
by Dr. Syed Rashid Ali

Dear Brother /Sisters in Islam!

Assalamoalaikum wa Rehmatullah wa Barakatohu.

In 1974, Islamic Scholars from 124 countries of the world met in Makkah al-Mukarramah under the auspecies of Rabita al-Alam al-Islami. They passed a unanimous resolution declaring Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani and his followers (Ahmadiyya Movement/Qadianis/Ahmadis/Mirzais/Lahoris) APOSTATEs, KAFIRs and OUT of the FOLD of ISLAM. For the last 100 years all religious scholares of MAKKAH al- MUKARRAMAH, al MADINAH al MUNAWWARAH, EGYPT, INDO-PAKISTAN and all ARAB & MUSLIM COUNTRIES have been united in their stand in declaring them Apostates, Kafirs and out of the fold of Islam.

MODUS OPERANDI:

Followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad call themselves 'AHMADI MUSLIMs'. They especially go to remote areas where Muslims have never heard the name of Mirza Ghulam or Qadianism or Ahmadiyyah Movement. Pretending to be SUNNI MUSLIMs and using their vast resources, offering Financial and other Material Incentives, they have thus misguided the poor ignorant Muslims masses in various parts of the world especially in Central and Western Africa, Far Eastern Countries and Central Asian Muslim Republics. Muslims in these region mostly belong to the Ahle Sunnah wal Jamaah and have never heard of MIRZA GHULAM or AHMADI or AHMADIYYAH MOVEMENT and therefore they are unware that the entire Muslim Ummah has declare them KAFIR and out of the FOLD of ISLAM. Thus they turn a Sunni Muslim into AHMADI MUSLIM.

QUESTION: If AHMADIS ARE SUNNI MUSLIMS, WHY DO THEY CALL THEMSELVES AHMADI MUSLIMS???

WHO WAS MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD QADIANI ?

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was born in a Muslim family in the North Indian village of Qadian in 1839. He recieved some religious education at home. He suffered from a variety of physical and mental illnesses of various kind and had a habit of taking OPIUM and TONIC WINE. Under the influence of British Rulers of India he sold his faith for petty wordly gains. He claimed to be the Promised Messiah, Mahdi, Prophet and the Second Advent of Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon Him), who has come again in the from of Mirza to propagate Islam. He claimed that he recieve WAHI (Revelation) and named BRAHEEN-e-AHMADIYYAH as the BOOK of GOD. Britishers were facing difficulties in India because of the spirit of Jehad in Muslims and at their instigation, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote books and pamphlets in which he ABROGATED JEHAD and made LOYALTY TO THE BRITISH RULERS AN ARTICLE OF FAITH. Mirza Ghulam formed the AHMADIYYAH MOVEMENT in 1889 and called his follwers AHMADI MUSLIMS. He labelled ALL THOSE WHO DID NOT ACCEPT HIM AND DID NOT ACCEPT HIS PROPHETHOOD as BASTARDS (children of prostitutes). Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died in 1908 but Ahmadiyyah Movement has continued to flourish ever since; earlier under the patronage of British Masters and now the US and other anti-Muslim Governments.

UN-ISLAMIC BELIEFS OF MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD:

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote 80 books during his life time, which provides an excellent insight into the mind of the man and how with passage of time his faith has evolved from Islam to Apostacy and Infedility. 'ROOHANI KHAZAIN' is the title for the collection of all the books by Mirza Ghulam, printed by the Ahmadiyya Movement Headquarter in London.

Mirza was born in a Muslim family. His early books therefore contained same beliefs as those of any other Sunni Muslim. But with the passage of time his beliefs underwent a dramatic change and his writings became more and more heretical and un-Islamic. However in an attempt to prove that Mirza Ghulam and Ahmadis are also Sunni Muslims, Ahmadiyyah Movement's propaganda literature usually give quotations from his earlier books. Ahmadis will mostly talk of Holy Quran and Hadith keeping Mirza Ghulam well in the background and usually presenting him as a Reformer or a Mujaddid or Mahdi Or Messiah, depending on which type of people they are preaching to. Mirza Ghulam's claims to Prophehood are not discussed.

Following are some extracts from the books of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad which provided the basis for Islamic Scholars to declare him and his followers Kafir, Apostate and out of the fold of Islam:

I. Mirza Ghulam says (Extracts from Izala-e-Auham, Roohani Khazain, vol 3 pp.114-472):

1.    Holy Prophet Mohammed(pbuh) did not understand the meaning of Surah AlZilzal.

2.    Other Prophets have also made mistakes and lied. (Mirza trying to justify his false statements and unfulfilled prophecies - Author)

3.    Hazrath Mohammad's Revelation also turned out to be wrong.

4.    Revelation did not inform Hazrath Mohammad (pbuh) about Ibne Maryam, Dajjal, Khare Dajjal, Yajoog Majoog and Daabatul Ardh.

5.    Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya is referred to as the Book of God in various other books by Mirza Ghulam eg. Roohani Khazain vol.22 p.502.

6.    " 'Inna Anzalnaaho Qareeban min alQadian wa bil Haq anzalnaahu No doubt we have sent him (Mirza) near Qadian and with truth we have sent him'; . . . this revelation which has been published in Braheene Ahmadiyya as well, is clearly and loudly revealing that the name of Qadian is definitely mentioned in Quran or Hadith as a prophecy."

7.    Names of Makkah, Madina and Qadian are mentioned with respect in Holy Quran.

8.    Holy Quran is full of obscene words. {Mirza trying to justify his foul language that he used against his opponents

II. Mirza Ghulam claimed that :

1.    He was the second advent of Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and better and superior than the first coming (Roohani Khazain vol 16 pp.272)

2.    Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has come again in this world as Mirza Ghulam to propagate Islam. (Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.249)

3.    Ahmadis should not differentiate between Mirza Ghulam and Hazrat Muhammad (pbuh) because "Anyone who differentiate between me and Mustafa (pbuh) has not seen me and not recognized me." (Roohani Khazain vol 16 pp.171).

4.    Mirza's WAHI told him : "'Muhammadur Rasoolullah wallazeena ma'ahoo ashiddaohoo' ala alkuffar rohamao bainahum' in this Wahi God has named me Muhammad and Rasoolullah." (Roohani Khazain vol 18 pp.207)

1.    Those who join Mirza's Jama'at becomes a SAHABI of Rasoolullah. (Roohani Khazain vol 16 pp.258-259)

2.    Since Mirza Ghulam is none other than Holy Prophet Muhmmad (pbuh) himself, therefore when an Ahmadi recites KALIMA TAYYEBAH, by Muhammadur Rasoolullah he means Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani. (Kalimat al Fasl by Mirza Basheer Ahmad s/o Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani)

III. From Mirza s/o Chiragh Bibi to Jesus s/o Mary:

1.    Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was the son of Chiragh Bibi but he claimed that he is Eisa Ibne Maryam. He said that at first God converted him into Maryam for two years. After two years, God made him pregnant by blowing the soul of Eisa into him; he remained pregnant for 10 months, after whcih God converted him into Eisa. This is how he became Maryam as well as Eisa ibne Maryam. (Rooahni Khazain vol 19 pp. 87-89)

IV. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that:

1.    He was Maseel Maseeh that is he has certain qualities which resemled like Eisa ibne Maryam (Roohani Khazain vol 1 p. 593).

2.    Hazrat Eisa (pbuh) was the son of Yousuf Najjar (Roohani Khazain vol 3 pp. 254).

3.    Hazrat Eisa is dead and he will not come again. (Rooahni Khazain vol.3 p.402)

4.    Jesus (Hazrat Eisa) was a habitual liar, had a habit of uttering obscenities, an alcoholic, gluttunous and a wicked person, neither a pious man nor a seeker of truth, he was a proud man and a self-conceited person who claimed divinity. (Roohani Khazain vol 9 p.387, vol.11 p.289).

5.    "The fact is that Hazrat Eisa did not perform any miracles." (Roohani Khazain vol 11 p. 290-291)

6.    "Three grandmothers of Hazrat Eisa were FORNICATORS and PROSTITUTES, from whose blood the body of Jesus came into being." (Roohani Khazain 11 p.291)

7.    "Hazrat Eisa had become insane due to epilepsy." (Roohani Khazain vol 9 p. 417)

8.    "I wish Hazrat Eisa had not come in this world." (Roohani Khazain vol 9 p. 417)

9.    "I am better than Eisa ibne Maryam." (Roohani Khazain vol 1 p.593)

10.                       "I have certain qualities resembling Jesus .....my nature and the nature of Jesus resembles so much as if two pieces of the same atom or like two seeds of the same tree." (Roohani Khazain vol.1 p.593)

V. Mirza boasted that:

1.    "Quran is God's Book and the words of my mouth." (Advertisment dated 15th March 1897, Roohani Khazain vol 22 p. 87)

2.    "I believe in my WAHI as I believe in Quran and Torah." (Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.454)

3.    "The basis for our claim is not Hadith but Quran and that WAHI which comes to us. Yes in support we also quote those Hadith which are according to Quran and DO NOT CONTRADICT MY WAHI. As for the REST OF THE HADITHs, I THROW THEM AWAY LIKE A WASTE PAPER." (Roohani Khazain vol 19 p.140)

4.    Bait-ul-Zikr (Mosque adjacent to Bait-ul-Fikr, the room where Mirza Ghulam used to sit and write books) is like Haram-e-Ka'aba, 'Wa man dakhalahoo kaan amina' {and whosoever enters it, is in peace}." (Roohani Khazain vol. 1 p.666-667)

5.    Verse [17:1] of Holy Quran: 'Praise be to Allah, who took His Servant on the Night Journey from Masjid Haram to Masjid Aqsa', its real and literal application is the Mosque built by father of Mirza Ghulam. (Collection of Advertisement vol.3 p.286)

[PS: According to Mirza Ghulam, Quran is the words of his mouth , his Mosque is like Haram-e-Kaba and Masjid -e-Aqsa is in Qadian and not in Jerushelm.]

VI. Mirza announced:

1.    "I am Adam , I am Noah, I am Abraham, I am Isaac, I am Jacob, I am Ishmael, I am Moses, I am Jesus son of Mary, I am Mohammad SAAW. . ." (Roohani Khazain vol 22, p.521)

2.    "True God is the one who has sent his Messenger in Qadian." (Roohani Khazain vol.18 p.231)

VII. Mirza declared that:

1.    "Except for the Children of Prostitutes, whose hearts have been sealed by God, everyone else has accepted me and believes in my Prophethood." (Aina-e-Kamalate Islam, Roohani Khazain vol 5 p.547). . . . .

2.    He, who does not believe on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, is Disobedient to God and Prophet and will go to Hell." (Advertisement by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad dated 25th May 1900)

3.    I am the "Self-implanted/Self-cultivated Seedling " of the British Government. "Government should take great care regarding this SELF-IMPLANTED SEEDLING . . . . .should instruct its officers to treat ME and MY JAMA'AT with special kindness and favours. Our family has never hesitated in shedding their blood in the way of British Rulers and did not stop from laying down their lives neither do they hesitate now." (Roohani Khazain vol.13 p.350)

4.    "From my early age till now when I am 65 years of age, I have been engaged , with my pen and tongue, in an important task to turn the hearts of Muslims towards the true love & Goodwill & sympathy for the British Government and to obliterate the idea of Jehad from the hearts of stupid (Muslims). " (Kitab-ul-Bariyah, Roohani Khazain vol 13 p.350)

5.    " . . . . for the sake of British Government, I have published & distributed 50,000 leaflets in this country (India) other Islamic countries(against jehad). . . . the result is that hundreds of thousands of people have given up their filthy ideas about Jihad." (Roohani Khazain vol 15 p.114)

Dear Brothers/Sisters in Islam!

These are the real beliefs of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani and his Ahmadiyya/Qadiani Jama'at, but the propaganda literature will only try to prove that they are Sunni Muslims. Hundreds of thousands of Muslims have lost their faith at the hands of Qadianis/Ahmadis because they had no knowledge about Mirza Ghulam or his Ahmadiyya Movement.

Western Powers are scared of the RESURGENCE OF ISLAM, the SPIRIT OF JEHAD of Muslims. They know that ANY MUSLIM WHO BECOMES A QADIANI/ AHMADI, is one Muslim less. Every Ahmadi must believe that JEHAD IS HARAM. Ahmadiyya Movement is therefore an agent of the Anti-Islamic Forces to take away our faith in the name of Islam.

MAY ALLAH PROTECT THE FAITH OF EVERY MUSLIM FROM ALL EVIL FORCES. AMEEN.

Wassalamoalikum wa Rehmatullahe wa Barakhatohoo

Your Brother in Islam
Dr Syed Rashid Ali

P O BOX 11560 DIBBA al-FUJAIRAH UNITED ARAB EMIRATES T.No. (9719) 447337 ** FAX (9719) 442846

email: rasyed@emirates. net.ae

http://www.alhafeez.org/rashid/

11
brother i request you to refute <removed> channel i am scared of it.
Don't make propaganda for it. Just ask your questions and they will be answered, God willing.

12
The Arabic word Allah is the name for the one and only true God who created the whole universe.  This word is used by Arabic speakers, both Arab Muslims and Arab Christians.  This word cannot be used to designate anything other than the one true God. The title of the thread is deceptive.




Sahih International
Say, "Call upon Allah or call upon al-Rahman (the Most Merciful). Whichever [name] you call - to Him belong the best names." And do not recite [too] loudly in your prayer or [too] quietly but seek between that an [intermediate] way.

---
Prophet Muhammad is the final prophet of God. It's basic information.

---
Kaaba is built by Prophets Ibraheem and Ismael to glorify God. Most of the Arabs had complied with the call of Ishmael (Peace be upon him) , and professed the religion of his father Abraham (Peace be upon him) They had worshipped Allâh, professed His Oneness and followed His religion a long time until they forgot part of what they had been reminded of. However, they still maintained such fundamental beliefs such as monotheism as well as various other aspects of Abraham’s religion, until the time when a chief of Khuza‘a, namely ‘Amr bin Luhai, who was granted unreserved love and obedience by his tribesmen, came back from a trip to Syria where he saw people worship idols, a phenomenon he approved of and believed it to be righteous since Syria was the locus of Messengers and Scriptures, he brought with him an idol (Hubal) which he placed in the middle of Al-Ka‘bah and summoned people to worship it. Readily enough, paganism spread all over Makkah and, thence, to Hijaz, people of Makkah being custodians of not only the Sacred House but the whole Haram as well. A great many idols, bearing different names, were introduced into the area. An idol called ‘Manat’, for instance, was worshipped in a place known as Al-Mushallal. Another, ‘Al-Lat’ in Ta’if, a third, ‘Al-‘Uzza’ in the valley of Nakhlah.
https://islamicnafahat.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/religion-of-arabs-prior-to-islam/
https://www.muhammad.net/index.php/biographies/17-ar-raheeq-al-makhtum/605-religions-of-the-arabs

Later, when Prophet Muhammad entered it upon opening of Mecca, he smashed all idols and returned it to its pure original state as built by Prophet Ibraheem.

Actually, many Christians pray towards Kaaba:
https://en.qantara.de/content/uncovering-portugal%CA%B9s-islamic-roots-where-christians-pray-facing-mecca

14
Jazakum Allahu khaira brother,

Quran however, correct the errors of the bible in many Ayat:
http://islamicbook.com/free/200-ways-the-quran-corrects-the-bible/

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 34

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube