1
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: Proof from Isaiah chapter 53 that the man God spoke about is NOT Jesus
« on: January 02, 2023, 09:19:08 PM »
R
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

??
??
? 
?
?? (to doubt, lit:he doubted) is a good example. This verb was originally 
but since the last two radicals (root letters) are the same they have combined into
??.
?? in the past tense. The verb
?? (and all doubled root verbs in general) opens up into three radicals in the third person plural feminine and the entirety of the second and first person conjugations in the past tense. You will understand what this means when I start conjugating. Let's start:
??
?


??
?
??
??
??

?? 

?

??
??



?? while "he doubted" is
??. In 
??, the kaaf opens up to two kaafs. This will happen for all doubled root verbs.
?
?

?

?

??

?
?

??

?

??

?
?
?
? and "they (f. plural) doubt" is 

?. The dhamma of the first radical ? in the former conjugation, is moved to the ? in the latter conjugation. This rule applies to every doubled root letter verb. Another example is the verb 
? (he touches), it turns into 

? (they f. plural touch). The fatha of the first radical ? of the former conjugation was moved to the second radical ? in the latter conjugation. 
.
?? (I loved). As for the example of an opened doubled root verb with a fatha on the second radical you already know it as we dedicated this whole topic to conjugate it, 
?? (I doubted). As for what vowel the second radical will have in the present tense when it opens up, it can be either of the three vowels but dhamma is the most common. For example it could either be 

? (they f. plural doubt), 

? (they f. plural touch), or 

? (they f. plural love). This would make the vowel go back to the first letter if it was masculine singular and make 
? (he doubts), 
? (he touches), and 
? (he loves). 
?? 
? (father)" is 

??, not 

?. The latter is the dual form (2 fathers), while the former is the plural form (3+ fathers). 
??
??
? 
? 
, a simple sound verb. This topic, I will show the three different shapes simple sound verbs can have. The different shapes depend on the vowel of the second root letter of the verb, which can either be fatha, dhamma, or kasra. Usually, Arabs use the verb 
(to do) as the dummy verb, so we will use this verb. 
(ex. 
), 
(ex. 
), and 
(ex. 
). 
(fatha on second root letter) are conjugated into the present tense, the second root letter can have any of the three vowels on it depending on which verb it is. For example, 
(he wrote) is conjugated into 
?? (he writes) with a dhamma on the second root letter, thus following the pattern 
??. Now the verb 
(he sat) is conjugated into 
?? (he sits) with a kasra on the second root letter, following the pattern 
??. Finally, the verb 
(he did) itself is conjugated into 
?? (he does) with a fatha on the second root letter, following the form 
?? (obviously). 
can be conjugated into three different shapes in the present tense. There is no method (that I know of) of knowing which verbs get conjugated into which form in the present tense. The shape each verb becomes in the present tense form has to be memorized by heart manually. 
. When verbs of these shapes are conjugated into the present tense, they either take the pattern of 
?? or 
??. For example, the verb 
(he played) becomes 
?? (he plays) with a fatha on the second root letter, following the model 
??, while the verb 
(he thought) becomes 
?? (he thinks) with a kasra on the second root letter, following the model 
??. (*NOTE: 
is one of those verbs that can either be conjugated into 
?? or 
??, so it follows both possible patterns it can take in the present tense form.) 
), you also have to memorize by heart which form it will take in the present tense. However, for this one there are only two forms it can take, in contrast to the three forms of 
shaped verbs. So this should be easier to memorize by heart than the last one. 
. This one does not require any memorizing manually. You just need to know that verbs of these shape will be in the form of 
?? in the present tense with a dhamma on the second root letter. The second root letter is dhamma in the past tense as well as present tense. For example, the verb 
(he was near) is conjugated into 
?? (he is near). 
??
The people of Noah's doom was a time-mark for a Divine Purpose only known to Allah Almighty. Their doom was to happen so that other Prophets and people were to emerge tall among all of the nations.
Also, seed?? of Noah here includes the Prophets that will come after him from the future generations:
?6:84??
??
![]()
![]()
??
??
?? ??
![]()
![]()
??
??
?
??
??
??
![]()
??
?
??
[006:084] We gave him Isaac and Jacob: all (three) guided: and before him, We guided Noah, and among his progeny, David, Solomon, Job, Joseph, Moses, and Aaron: thus do We reward those who do good:
The Muslims are the seed of Noah:
?6:133?
?? ??
??
![]()
![]()
? ??
??
![]()
![]()
??
?
![]()
??
[006:133] Thy Lord is self-sufficient, full of Mercy: if it were His will, He could destroy you, and in your place appoint whom He will as your successors, even as He raised you up from the posterity of other people.
??). So be grateful to Me and your parents. To Me is the final return."
?? (dual form of
) which is supposed to mean "good years" according to them. Except literally when the Verse says the mother faced "hardship upon hardship" for two
, I dont think those
were "good years". Now if they argue that the baby's weaning in the baby's point of view were part of the "good years", I dont think trying to give the baby other food, they would like to be given food other than breast milk when that is all that it wants. So that is also hardship.
QuoteSixth, Verse 29:14 itself says that Noah REMAINED WITH HIS PEOPLE, and not lived, for 1000 minus 50 years, thus "proving" that the Quran never said Noah lived for 950 years.
Finally, they say that after doing the math, 1000minus 50
, which unit should the answer be in,
or
? Thus, they say that just doing simple math here doesn't make sense, "falsyfing" the claim that Noah lived for 950 years. (I find this reasoning to be poor because
and
mean the same thing and are synonyms, so the answer would be in
or
.
The number of Letters and number of years perfectly matching exists throughout the Glorious Quran, and is one of the Quran's beautiful Numerical Miracles phenomenon that were discovered. Prophet Noah's Chapter is written in exactly 950 Letters. Not 951 or 949. Prophet Noah is also the cornerstone of the Glorious Quran's number 19 Miracle. He is the only Prophet that was given this Divine Honor from Allah Almighty. This is thoroughly demonstrated with 1000s of scanned images at:
www.answering-christianity.com/100_percent_guarantee_that_quran_is_divine.htm
The doomed-to-Hell infidels are bankrupt, and they're on their way to Eternal Destruction. They think it is laughs and jokes.
Take care,
Osama Abdallah
-Scientifically speaking, it's impossible to determine the age of death of a historical figure whose womb is not examined.
-There is nothing that makes his age of death impossible. Allah is All-powerful.
What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube
