Apocalypse of peter is not reliable

[Kamil ali]

Apocalypse of Peter is not authentic or reliable because it's scripture of second century

[Sama]

None of the disciples was there when Jesus was crucified, the whole story of crucifixion was narrated on a third party narrator, it is quite clear that the whole story of crucifixion was borrowed from the ancient religions, there were about sixteen saviors in history who died crucified the same way Jesus -allegedly- crucified, they all preceded Jesus, they all one in special trinity.

According to the NIV and KJV Bible's theologians, the gospels were written by mysterious and unknown people, in unknown places and unknown dates!


Unlike the Gospels of the New Testament, the Apocalypse of Peter (the Revelations sent to Peter) is thought to be directly written and spoken by Peter himself. 
http://www.quran-m.com/firas/en1/index.php/comparative-religions/446-the-apocalypse-of-peter-refutes-the-crucifixion-of-jesus.html
http://www.answering-christianity.com/apocalypse_of_peter.htm

[Mohamed Saif]

Assalamun alaikum

The apocalypse of Peter speaks of a Savior.  Who is that Savior?