What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog
Why I do not convert to Christianity
Recently one Christian missionary wrote an article of why he does not convert to Islam, his article can be found here:
I must say, the reasons this missionary gave were a bit entertaining to see, since nearly if not all of his reasons have been answered. However so, it is up to this missionary, if he wants to remain on the path of falsehood, that is his own loss, if he wants to come to the path of truth, then that it his own gain.
I will now be giving my reasons of why I am not a Christian and why I would NEVER become a Christian. Before reading this, I would tell my Christian readers to please not get insulted or offended, I just speak from what I see from the Bible, if my reasons offend you, then that is to bad, since you Christians wouldnt really care if you offended or insulted a Muslim by giving your reasons as to why your not a Muslim, such as the missionary.
I also give this response, because just like the missionary, many Christians have often asked me to become Christian, and tried to convince me to leave Islam, however so, rationally I cannot come to such a belief as Christianity, and I never will. Here are my reasons:
I do not believe in a porn book
Now this may seem rude, however so, that is how it is. The amount of sexual stories that are seen in the Bible is simply hilarious, one would have to ask is why is God so concerned about talking about sexual encounters. Here are the relevant passages:
1 And it came to pass at that time, that
12 And in process of time the daughter of Shuah
24 And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told
So note Judah sleeps with his daughter in law. Here is another story:
2 Samuel 11: 1-27 :
And it came to pass, after the year was expired, at the time when
kings go forth to battle, that David sent Joab, and his servants with him, and all
6 And David sent to Joab, saying, Send me Uriah the Hittite. And Joab sent Uriah to David. 7 And when Uriah was come unto him, David demanded of him how Joab did, and how the people did, and how the war prospered. 8 And David said to Uriah, Go down to thy house, and wash thy feet. And Uriah departed out of the king's house, and there followed him a mess of meat from the king. 9 But Uriah slept at the door of the king's house with all the servants of his lord, and went not down to his house. 10 And when they had told David, saying, Uriah went not down unto his house, David said unto Uriah, Camest thou not from thy journey? why then didst thou not go down unto thine house? 11 And Uriah said unto David, The ark, and
14 And it came to pass in the morning, that David wrote a letter to Joab, and sent it by the hand of Uriah. 15 And he wrote in the letter, saying, Set ye Uriah in the forefront of the hottest battle, and retire ye from him, that he may be smitten, and die. 16 And it came to pass, when Joab observed the city, that he assigned Uriah unto a place where he knew that valiant men were. 17 And the men of the city went out, and fought with Joab: and there fell some of the people of the servants of David; and Uriah the Hittite died also. 18 Then Joab sent and told David all the things concerning the war; 19 And charged the messenger, saying, When thou hast made an end of telling the matters of the war unto the king, 20 And if so be that the king's wrath arise, and he say unto thee, Wherefore approached ye so nigh unto the city when ye did fight? knew ye not that they would shoot from the wall? 21 Who smote Abimelech the son of Jerubbesheth? did not a woman cast a piece of a millstone upon him from the wall, that he died in Thebez? why went ye nigh the wall? then say thou, Thy servant Uriah the Hittite is dead also. 22 So the messenger went, and came and showed David all that Joab had sent him for. 23 And the messenger said unto David, Surely the men prevailed against us, and came out unto us into the field, and we were upon them even unto the entering of the gate. 24 And the shooters shot from off the wall upon thy servants; and some of the king's servants be dead, and thy servant Uriah the Hittite is dead also. 25 Then David said unto the messenger, Thus shalt thou say unto Joab, Let not this thing displease thee, for the sword devoureth one as well as another: make thy battle more strong against the city, and overthrow it: and encourage thou him. 26 And when the wife of Uriah heard that Uriah her husband was dead, she mourned for her husband. 27 And when the mourning was past, David sent and fetched her to his house, and she became his wife, and bare him a son. But the thing that David had done displeased the LORD.
So note, we have men sleeping with the next door neighbours wife now. There is still more:
1 Then went Samson to Gaza, and saw there an harlot, and went in unto her. 2 And it was told the Gazites, saying, Samson is come hither
So Samson goes to Gaza, he sees a harlot and has sex with her, what is the main point of giving this information? Does this information bring us closer to God? Does it teach us about God? Does it give us a law or anything? Is there any point in mentioning this event? In fact as you read on into the chapter, there is no point at all in mentioning this story, in fact Samson is not even punished. It just says he has sex with a harlot, and case closed.
Genesis 19: 30-36:
Genesis 19: 30-36:
And Lot went up out of Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with him; for he feared to dwell in Zoar: and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters. And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father [is] old, and [there is] not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth:Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, [and] lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father.
2- The Bible allows the rape of virgins
In the so called holy Bible, there is a law which actually makes it okay to rape virgins, oh yes sorry, all the rapist has to do is pay a fine and marry his victim. Here are the relevant passages:
So I first begin with Deuteronomy 22:25-29 which allows rape, here are the passages:
25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die. 26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbor, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: 27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her. 28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
Now incase you didnt catch where the rape is allowed I shall break the verses down to make it more clear and easier to understand. So lets break it down:
25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die. 26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbor, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: 27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her
Now Christians always love to quote this part in a defence to show that rape is not allowed. However so much to their attempts it fails, to start off with what the Christian always forgets to mention is that verses 25-27 is talking about a NON-VIRGIN who is raped. So yes, the Christian is right, verses 25-27 do condemn rape, however so it only condemns rape in certain cases. So now we have established that if a non-virgin is raped then the rapist shall be killed. However so lets now read on to see where the rape is allowed:
28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
So now in verse 28 we see that if a man rapes a VIRGIN then his punishment is that he has to pay her father and marry her! What kind of law is that? I would really love to know why do you kill the rapist if he rapes a non virgin and why dont you kill the rapist when he rapes a virgin? So as we all just saw, rape is condoned in certain cases in the Bible, when the victim happens to be a virgin the man gets away with it, when the victim is a non virgin the man is killed. Let me post the entire passages again:
25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die. 26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbor, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: 27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her. 28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days
So there you go, in verses 25-27 when the non virgin is raped the rapist is killed. In verses 28-29 when a virgin is raped the rapist is not killed, the rape victim has to marry the rapist! Now I can assure you that no rape victim would ever want to marry her rapist, she would rather kill herself than marry her rapist. I wonder what a Christian has to say to this?
Now incase a Christian comes up and says that this is the OT and they follow the OT anymore here is my response:
1- Even if you do not follow the OT this law and rule still applied at one time. The person who made this rule and law is the God of Israel, and all you Christians believe in the God of Israel so hence at one time your God (Jesus) allowed rape in certain cases, the case being if the rape victim was a virgin.
2- 2 Timothy states:
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness
So hence the NT states that ALL scripture is God-breathed and is there for doctrine, for reproof, for correction and instruction. This verse applies to the OT as well since the OT is God-breathed, hence Deuteronomy according to 2 Timothy can be used for doctrine, reproof, correction or instruction! So hence the OT verse can still be applied to even in todays age according to the NT! So Christians have no way out of this hole. Theyre book allows rape, the NT says all scripture is God-breathed and is there for help and must be followed, hence Christians should follow the law of Deuteronomy which makes it okay to rape virgins.
Here is some more information on this subject:
The Bible also allows you to go kidnap women when they are alone, you have to behind trees like a stalker and wait till you find her alone, then go and kidnap her. Here are the relevant passages:
So they sent twelve thousand warriors to Jabesh-gilead
with orders to kill everyone there, including women and children. "This is what
you are to do," they said. "Completely destroy all the males and every woman who
is not a virgin." Among the residents of Jabesh-gilead they found four hundred
young virgins who had never slept with a man, and they brought them to the camp at
The Israelite assembly sent
a peace delegation to the little remnant of Benjamin who were living at the rock of
Rimmon. Then the men of Benjamin returned to their homes, and the four hundred women of
Jabesh-gilead who were spared were given to them as wives. But there were not enough
women for all of them. The people felt sorry for Benjamin because the LORD had left
this gap in the tribes of
Then they thought of the
annual festival of the LORD held in
This is what you call legalized rape.
3- The Bible is pro-slavery book
The Bible is one of the most pro-slavery books I have read, no wonder those Europeans and Americans always allowed slavery and had alot of slave trades without any compassion, its because their book allows it, so they were not being bad Christians. Here are all the relevant passages:
When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment.
This verse could also be described as the sex slave industry.
However, you may purchase
male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also
purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in
your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as
a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of
So note, there is also racism in this verse. Note if you an Israelite, then you cannot be a slave, if your a non-Israelite its okay if your a slave, and its okay if the Israelites make you their slaves. Also note, these are child slaves also:
You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners
Also these children will remain slaves even until they grow up, since they will be passed on as inheritance to the future generation.
If you buy a Hebrew slave, he is to serve for only six years. Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom. If he was single when he became your slave and then married afterward, only he will go free in the seventh year. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife will be freed with him. If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master. But the slave may plainly declare, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children. I would rather not go free.' If he does this, his master must present him before God. Then his master must take him to the door and publicly pierce his ear with an awl. After that, the slave will belong to his master forever. Exodus 21:2-6
So note, if your a slave, and you have wife, and you then have kids, the kids and wife will remain in the property of the master, and the father/husband can stay with them is that if he pledges to be a slave for life! The verse could have been kind enough to make an exception and allow the slaves to be free on the good will of the owner, but no, there is no such thing, the only way to be with his family is to remain a slave forever.
Many more verses could be shown, but I think the picture is clear.
4- The Bible allows you to torture you
Not only is the Bible pro-slavery, the Bible is pro-torture on slaves, here is the relevant passage:
When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property
So note, as long as the slave does not die then you wont be punished, so this basically means you can hurt your slave as much as you want, just make sure the slave does not die. Wow, how sweet of the Bible.
5- The Bible allows the killing of
women and children
Not only is the Bible pro- slavery, pro-rape, pro-torture, it is also pro-massacres. Here are the verses:
And the LORD said unto me,
Behold, I have begun to give Sihon and his land before thee: begin to possess, that thou
mayest inherit his land. 32 Then Sihon came out against
us, he and all his people, to fight at Jahaz. 33 And the LORD our God
delivered him before us; and we smote him, and his
sons, and all his people. 34 And we took all his cities
at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none
to remain. 36 From Aroer, which is by the
brink of the
1 Then we turned, and went up
the way to
17 And the city shall be
accursed, even it, and all that are therein, to the LORD: only Rahab the harlot shall
live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we
sent. 18 And ye, in any wise keep
yourselves from the accursed thing, lest ye make yourselves accursed, when ye take of the
accursed thing, and make the camp of
28 And that day Joshua took
Makkedah, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and the king thereof he utterly
destroyed, them, and all the souls that were therein; he let none remain: and he did to
the king of Makkedah as he did unto the king of Jericho. 29 Then Joshua passed from
Makkedah, and all Israel with him, unto Libnah, and fought against Libnah: 30 And the LORD delivered it
also, and the king thereof, into the hand of Israel; and he smote it with the edge of the
sword, and all the souls that were therein; he let none remain in it; but did unto the
king thereof as he did unto the king of Jericho. 31 And Joshua passed from
Libnah, and all Israel with him, unto Lachish, and encamped against it, and fought against
it: 32 And the LORD delivered
Lachish into the hand of Israel, which took it on the second day, and smote it with the
edge of the sword, and all the souls that were therein, according to all that he had done
to Libnah. 33 Then Horam king of
"Then I heard the LORD
say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead
is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all old and young, girls and
women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right
here at the
Anyone who is captured will
be run through with a sword. Their little children will be dashed to death right before
their eyes. Their homes will be sacked and their wives raped by the attacking hordes. For
I will stir up the Medes against
All those verses speak for themselves.
7- The Bible is intolerant to other
Christians often like to boast how tolerant Their holy Bible is, and that there God allows free will and all. However so, it seems the Christians are reading something that is not in the text, and as usual the Christians have created a myth and they now really believe this myth. Here is the tolerance of the Bible towards other faiths:
6 If thy brother, the son of
thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is
as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which
thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; 7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round
about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto
the other end of the earth; 8 Thou shalt not consent unto
him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare,
neither shalt thou conceal him: 9 But thou shalt surely kill
him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of
all the people. 10 And thou shalt stone him with
stones, that he die; because he hath sought to
thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from
the house of bondage. 11 And all
12 If thou shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the LORD thy God hath given thee to dwell there, saying, 13 Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known; 14 Then shalt thou inquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you; 15 Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword. 16 And thou shalt gather all the spoil of it into the midst of the street thereof, and shalt burn with fire the city, and all the spoil thereof every whit, for the LORD thy God: and it shall be an heap for ever; it shall not be built again. 17 And there shall cleave nought of the cursed thing to thine hand: that the LORD may turn from the fierceness of his anger, and show thee mercy, and have compassion upon thee, and multiply thee, as he hath sworn unto thy fathers; 18 When thou shalt hearken to the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep all his commandments which I command thee this day, to do that which is right in the eyes of the LORD thy God.
I want a Christian to show me where this act is forbidden, since the NT tells me to follow all scripture, and that all scripture is useful. So much for religious tolerance.
8- Paul viewed marriage as a means to
simply have sex
Now Paul the false apostle was very against marriage, he often spoke against it, telling people to not get married, which fits the criteria of a false prophet. However so, Paul did compromise some what. Paul told his followers that if they could not contain their sexual lust, and their horny desires, then they should simply go get married to fulfil these lusts and sexual pleasures, so basically marriage was simply a means to have sex, not to love. Here are the relevant passages:
1 Corinthians 7: 1-2:
1 Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman. 2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
Another translation reads:
"Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman. But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, EACH MAN SHOULD HAVE HIS OWN WIFE AND EACH WOMAN HER OWN HUSBAND
So note, Paul simply tells you to marry to have sex, to fulfill your sexual desires so you dont commit fornication.
"To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is good for them to remain single as I am. But if they cannot exercise self-control, THEY SHOULD MARRY. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion." 1 Corinthians 7:8-9
So it is better to get married rather be filled with sexual passion, so you should go get married to fulfill this sexual passion.
9- The Bible believes its salvation is
saved by a pagan sacrifice
One of the most disturbing events in the Bible is the supposed crucifixion saga. The reason it is very disturbing, is because the Bible teaches that man is saved by the death of an innocent man who is Jesus, so note, the Christian salvation is based on an innocent man dying for them, that alone is bad. However it gets worst, the reason I call this sacrifice of Jesus pagan is because it is! The pagans would sacrifice their children to please their Gods, and to for forgiveness. This is exactly the same with Jesus, The Father sacrificed his Son Jesus! So note the similarity, just like the pagans, who sacrificed their children, the Christian God did the very same thing, he sacrificed his son!
Also just like the pagan sacrifices of children, those children were innocent children, who had done no wrong, the exact same thing with Jesus, he was an innocent man, sinless as the Christians say. Yet he was still sacrificed in a barbaric way, just like those little children who were sacrificed by the pagans. So yes. Christian salvation lies upon a pagan sacrifice.
10- The Bible contains many fairy take
Matthew 27: 50-53:
50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost. 51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; 52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many
So note, we have graves being opened up, and the dead people raising from the dead and then walking through Jerusalem! So dead people walking around Jerusalem!!!!!!! It might just be me, but I have never ever read this in any historic book, nor has anyone brought this up at school. The only time I heard this story was from the Bible, even Christians never told me this, I guess they were too embarrassed by this embarrassing story found in the Gospel of Matthew and not in the other 3 eye-witness Gospels.
Revelations 12: 1-9
And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 2 And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. 3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. 4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born. 5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. 6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. 7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, 8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. 9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
Revelations 13: 1-5:
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the
sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. 3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. 4 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God;
Yes, an angel stood in the sun.
11- Paul has a very strange law,
which is all about death and killing people as a punishment for sins most of us have done
Romans 1: 29-32 :
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
So according to Paul you deserve to die for committing sins such as backbiting, being proud, or boasting, even having envy makes you worthy of death!
12- The Bible has many other strange
1 He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD. 2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD. 3 An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever: 4 Because they met you not with bread and with water in the way, when ye came forth out of Egypt; and because they hired against thee Balaam the son of Beor of Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse thee
15 But it shall come to pass,
if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe to do all his
commandments and his statutes which I command thee this day; that all these curses shall
come upon thee, and overtake thee: 16 Cursed shalt thou be in the
city, and cursed shalt thou be in the field. 17 Cursed shall be thy basket
and thy store. 18 Cursed shall be the fruit of
thy body, and the fruit of thy land, the increase of thy kine, and the flocks of thy
sheep. 19 Cursed shalt thou be when
thou comest in, and cursed shalt thou be when thou goest out. 20 The LORD shall send upon thee
cursing, vexation, and rebuke, in all that thou settest thine hand unto for to do, until
thou be destroyed, and until thou perish quickly; because of the wickedness of thy doings,
whereby thou hast forsaken me. 21 The LORD shall make the
pestilence cleave unto thee, until he have consumed thee from off the land, whither thou
goest to possess it. 22 The LORD shall smite thee
with a consumption, and with a fever, and with an inflammation, and with an extreme
burning, and with the sword, and with blasting, and with mildew; and they shall pursue
thee until thou perish. 23 And thy heaven that is over
thy head shall be brass, and the earth that is under thee shall be iron. 24 The LORD shall make the rain
of thy land powder and dust: from heaven shall it come down upon thee, until thou be
destroyed. 25 The LORD shall cause thee to
be smitten before thine enemies: thou shalt go out one way against them, and flee seven
ways before them: and shalt be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth. 26 And thy carcass shall be
meat unto all fowls of the air, and unto the beasts of the earth, and no man shall fray
them away. 27 The LORD will smite thee with
the botch of
45 Moreover all these curses shall come upon thee, and shall pursue thee, and overtake thee, till thou be destroyed; because thou hearkenedst not unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which he commanded thee: 46 And they shall be upon thee for a sign and for a wonder, and upon thy seed for ever. 47 Because thou servedst not the LORD thy God with joyfulness, and with gladness of heart, for the abundance of all things; 48 Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the LORD shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee. 49 The LORD shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand; 50 A nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old, nor show favor to the young: 51 And he shall eat the fruit of thy cattle, and the fruit of thy land, until thou be destroyed: which also shall not leave thee either corn, wine, or oil, or the increase of thy kine, or flocks of thy sheep, until he have destroyed thee. 52 And he shall besiege thee in all thy gates, until thy high and fenced walls come down, wherein thou trustedst, throughout all thy land: and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates throughout all thy land, which the LORD thy God hath given thee. 53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the LORD thy God hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee: 54 So that the man that is tender among you, and very delicate, his eye shall be evil toward his brother, and toward the wife of his bosom, and toward the remnant of his children which he shall leave: 55 So that he will not give to any of them of the flesh of his children whom he shall eat: because he hath nothing left him in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee in all thy gates. 56 The tender and delicate woman among you, which would not adventure to set the sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness and tenderness, her eye shall be evil toward the husband of her bosom, and toward her son, and toward her daughter, 57 And toward her young one that cometh out from between her feet, and toward her children which she shall bear: for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and straitness, wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates. 58 If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, THE LORD THY GOD; 59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance. 60 Moreover he will bring upon thee all the diseases of
1- God will cause his people to murdered and massacared, and they will flee in all directions.
will beget children but will not be able to enjoy them because they will be sent into
2- People will beget children but will not be able to enjoy them because they will be sent into slavery.
People's children shall be given to other people and the parents will wish they could have
them back but they wont.
3- People's children shall be given to other people and the parents will wish they could have them back but they wont.
4- cannabilism, yes cannabilism! 53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the LORD thy God hath given thee
5- God will send diseases to the people
will get married, and your wife will sleep with other men.
6- You will get married, and your wife will sleep with other men.
I could show more, but those two are enough .
13- The Bible does not prohibit
Now I know not every specific thing that may harm you has to be banned, however so, alcohol is one of those major things which must be banned, it ranks along side adultery, fornication, and other major sins.
Unlike the Quran, the Bible falls short of forbidding alcohol, hence the Bible is a direct cause of many Christians who suffer from liver disease, car accidents, deformation of babies etc. If the Bible would ban it, most of those Christians would cease to drink, and if they continued to do it, that would be their own sin, the fact the Bible does no prohibit alcohol also makes it responsible. Hence the God of the Bible fell short on this one.
14- The Bible is unreliable
Gospel of Luke.
We now turn our attention to the Gospel of Luke.
The evangelist does not claim to have been an eyewitness of Jesus's life, but to have investigated everything carefully and to have written an orderly narrative of the facts (Luke 1:1-4).
So much for the Christian myth that the first 4 gospels of the NT were all written by eyewitnesses, as we can see all Luke did was study and investigate and then wrote his own Gospel, he never witnessed anything so therefore his Gospel is unreliable already.
Marcion rejected the first two chapters and some shorter passages of the gospel, and it was at one time maintained by rationalistic writers that his was the original Gospel of which ours is a later expansion.
The best information as to his sources is given by St. Luke, in the beginning of his Gospel. As many had written accounts as they heard them from "eyewitnesses and ministers of the word", it seemed good to him also, having diligently attained to all things from the beginning, to write an ordered narrative. He had two sources of information, then, eyewitnesses (including Apostles) and written documents taken down from the words of eyewitnesses. The accuracy of these documents he was in a position to test by his knowledge of the character of the writers, and by comparing them with the actual words of the Apostles and other eyewitnesses.
So basically this is like what Bukhari and Muslim did with the Hadiths with slight differences. The only difference here is that Luke turned the information into a supposed book of God! How can any honest Christian trust the book of Luke as a book completely from God when we read such information? Luke was not inspired, he only studied and investigated and then made a narrative and now people claim it is from God. Every scholar could do that, get lots of information on specific events, then take out what he feels are not true and put in what he feels is true to make a narrative which is correct according to him.
GOSPEL OF JOHN
Robert Kysar writes the following on the authorship of the Gospel of John (The Anchor Bible Dictionary, v. 3, pp. 919-920):
The supposition that the author was one and the same with the beloved disciple is often advanced as a means of insuring that the evangelist did witness Jesus' ministry. Two other passages are advanced as evidence of the same - and . But both falter under close scrutiny. does not claim that the author was the one who witnessed the scene but only that the scene is related on the sound basis of eyewitness. is part of the appendix of the gospel and should not be assumed to have come from the same hand as that responsible for the body of the gospel. Neither of these passages, therefore, persuades many Johannine scholars that the author claims eyewitness status.
There is a case to be made that John, the son of Zebedee, had already died long before the Gospel of John came to be written.
The fifth chapter tells of the cure of the paralytic at the pool of
This passage contains the story of the adulteress. The external critical evidence seems in this ease to give still clearer decision against the authenticity of this passage. It is wanting in the four earliest manuscripts (B, A, C, and aleph) and many others, while in many copies it is admitted only with the critical mark, indicative of doubtful authenticity. Nor is it found in the Syrian translation of Cureton, in the Sinaiticus, the Gothic translation, in most codices of the Peshito, or of the Coptic and Armenian translations, or finally in the oldest manuscripts of the Itala. None of the Greek Fathers have treated the incident in their commentaries, and, among Latin writers, Tertullian, Cyprian, and Hilary appear to have no knowledge of this pericope.
So now we have verses in the Gospel of John on which there is doubt, and are not authentic and not written by John. This itself is enough to throw this book away, but as we saw people arent even sure about who wrote this Gospel.
book of Matthew.
The relation of the gospels to one another is the subject of some debate. Most modern scholars believe that Matthew borrowed from Mark and the hypothetical Q document, but some scholars believe that Matthew was written first and that Mark borrowed from Matthew (see: Augustinian hypothesis). Out of a total of 1071 verses, Matthew has 387 in common with Mark and the Gospel of Luke, 130 with Mark, 184 with Luke; only 387 being peculiar to itself.
Like the authors of the other gospels, the author of Matthew wrote this book according to his own plans and aims and from HIS OWN POINT OF VIEW, while at the same time borrowing from other sources. According to the two-source hypothesis (the most commonly accepted solution to the synoptic problem), Matthew borrowed from both Mark and a hypothetical sayings collection, known by scholars as Q (for the German Quelle, meaning "source").
There are numerous testimonies, starting from Papias and Irenaeus, that Matthew originally wrote in the Hebrew tongue, which could also refer to Aramaic. The sixteenth century Erasmus was the first to express doubts on the subject of an original Hebrew version of the Gospel of Matthew: "It does not seem probable to me that Matthew wrote in Hebrew, since no one testifies that he has seen any trace of such a volume." Here Erasmus distinguishes between a Gospel of Matthew in Hebrew and the lost apocryphal Gospel of the Hebrews and Gospel of the Nazoraeans, from which patristic writers do quote. The vast majority of contemporary scholars, based on analysis of the Greek of canonical Gospel of Matthew and use of sources such as the Greek Gospel of Mark, conclude that the book we have today was written originally in Greek and is not a translation from Hebrew or Aramaic (per Rev. Raymond E. Brown, An Introduction to the New Testament, p. 210). If they are correct, then writers such as Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Jerome referred to a document or documents distinct from the present Gospel of Matthew, as confirmed by the fact that Nicephorus lists the Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of the Hebrews separately in his Stichometry. All of the aforementioned texts are distinct from the Gospel of the Ebionites, Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew, and Shem-Tov Matthew.
The question of authenticity assumes an altogether special aspect in regard to the First Gospel. The early Christian writers assert that St. Matthew wrote a Gospel in Hebrew; this Hebrew Gospel has, however, entirely disappeared, and the Gospel which we have, and from which ecclesiastical writers borrow quotations as coming from the Gospel of Matthew, is in Greek.
3) Finally, were the Logia of Matthew and the Gospel to which ecclesiastical writers refer written in Hebrew or Aramaic? Both hypotheses are held. Papias says that Matthew wrote the Logia in the Hebrew (Hebraidi) language; St. IrenŠus and Eusebius maintain that he wrote his gospel for the Hebrews in their national language, and the same assertion is found in several writers. Matthew would, therefore, seem to have written in modernized Hebrew, the language then used by the scribes for teaching. But, in the time of Christ, the national language of the Jews was Aramaic, and when, in the New Testament, there is mention of the Hebrew language (Hebrais dialektos), it is Aramaic that is implied. Hence, the aforesaid writers may allude to the Aramaic and not to the Hebrew. Besides, as they assert, the Apostle Matthew wrote his Gospel to help popular teaching. To be understood by his readers who spoke Aramaic, he would have had to reproduce the original catechesis in this language, and it cannot be imagined why, or for whom, he should have taken the trouble to write it in Hebrew, when it would have had to be translated thence into Aramaic for use in religious services. Moreover, Eusebius (Hist. eccl., III, xxiv, 6) tells us that the Gospel of Matthew was a reproduction of his preaching, and this we know, was in Aramaic. An investigation of the Semitic idioms observed in the Gospel does not permit us to conclude as to whether the original was in Hebrew or Aramaic, as the two languages are so closely related. Besides, it must be home in mind that the greater part of these Semitisms simply reproduce colloquial Greek and are not of Hebrew or Aramaic origin. However, we believe the second hypothesis to be the more probable, viz., that Matthew wrote his Gospel in Aramaic.
Let us now recall the testimony of the other ecclesiastical writers on the Gospel of
St. Matthew. St. IrenŠus (Adv. Haer., III, i, 2) affirms that Matthew published among the
Hebrews a Gospel which he wrote in their own language. Eusebius (Hist.
eccl., V, x, 3) says that, in
So note the major problems the Christians face just on establishing what language Matthew wrote his Gospel in. The early Christians as we see had a different version of Matthew than we have today!
Much more could be said, but that should give a good picture.
15- The Bible admits it is corrupted
the Book of Jeremiah, Chapter 8, Verse 8 it says this
8 " 'How can you
say, "We are wise,
for we have the law of the LORD,"
when actually the lying pen of the scribes
has handled it falsely?
For further information regarding this topic please consult this link:
16- Women are defiling to men
I will merely quote some of brother Karims excellent article:
And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb. And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God. (Revelation 14:1-5 NIV)
David Guzik's Commentary on Revelation
Ray C. STedman comments on Revelation 14:4:
More proof from bible websites with honest commentary :
For the full article visit this link:
17- Paul is a liar, who contradicted himself on how he met Jesus
The first mention of Paul meeting Jesus on the road to
1 And Saul, yet breathing out
threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest, 2 And desired of him letters to
So few things to note, Paul is on a journey, he then sees a light and hears a voice, this voice is supposedly Jesus. Paul then asks Jesus what do you want me to do? The response by Jesus is for Paul to go to the city and it will be made known to him over there. Now lets read whats Acts 26: 12-18:
12 Whereupon as I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests, 13 At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me. 14 And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. 15 And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. 16 But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; 17 Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee, 18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me
So note the difference, in the first account all Jesus tells him is go to the city to find out what you must do, in this account in Acts 22 we see Jesus already telling Paul what he meant to do! So which one is it? Will Paul know what his purpose is in the city? Or did he already know?
In fact in the account version of Acts 22: 5-10, there is no mention of Jesus telling Paul all this information:
. 5 As also the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders: from whom also I received letters unto the brethren, and went to Damascus, to bring them which were there bound unto Jerusalem, for to be punished. 6 And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light round about me. 7 And I fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? 8 And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? And he said unto me, I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest. 9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. 10 And I said, What shall I do, LORD? And the Lord said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed for thee to do
This account agrees with the version of Acts 9, Acts 26 is the only different one in this case, Acts 26 contradicts Acts 9 and 22.
It is very easy to notice the contradiction, in Acts 9 and 22, Jesus tells Paul that he will know what to do in the city, in Acts 26 Jesus already tells Paul what he will do and mentions nuthing about going to a city to find out. So which one is it? We already have enough proof to discredit the entire account of Paul meeting Jesus, however so there is more.
Acts 9: 1-7:
1 And Saul, yet breathing out
threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest, 2 And desired of him letters to
So as we can see, Acts verse 7 says that the men who accompanied Paul heard a voice, but saw no man, they saw nodoby. Now let us compare this with Acts 22 5-9:
. 5 As also the high priest
doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders: from whom also I received letters
unto the brethren, and went to
So now as you can see, in Acts 22 Paul says the man saw a light, but heard no voice! In Acts 9 Paul says the men so no man, but heard a voice!!!! The obvious contradiction is there for all to see, there is no denying it. So this piece of information also throws doubt into the entire episode, it shows that this story is not credible at all. We already have 2 contradictions, it is safe to say that if we were in court this information would be thrown out and Paul would be exposed as a liar for all the jury to see.
For more information on this subject visit this link:
18- The Bible differs with Gods true word the Quran
The Bible claims that Jesus was killed and crucified on the cross, however so, Gods true word, the Quran denies this lie:
YUSUFALI: That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-
Anyone who says something other than what God says, that man is a liar, the Bible differs on what God said, hence the person who wrote the Bible with the crucifixion episode with Jesus dying on the cross made it up, and lied, and I believe that liar would be non other than Paul.
19- The Bible is incoherent and inconsistent
The Bible tells us that Abraham married his sister:
Genesis 20:11-12: 11 And Abraham said, Because I thought, Surely the fear of God is not in this place; and they will slay me for my wife's sake. 12 And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.
However we also see the Bible later on forbids such an action:
Deuteronomy 27:22: 22 Cursed be he that lieth with his sister, the daughter of his father, or the daughter of his mother. And all the people shall say, Amen
So now we see that its something bad to marry your sister, and you will be cursed if you do so. So hence the question, is can you marry your sister or not? Should I be allowed to follow Abrahams example, Gods friend as the Bible calls him, or should I go on and follow what Moses taught which is that its forbidden and you become cursed. Which one?
20- The Bible
Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin. (Romans 3:20)
For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God's sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous. (Romans 2:13)
Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ. (Galatians 6:2)
For each one should carry his own load. (Galatians 6:5)
He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble. (Job 9:6)
He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (Psalms 104:5)
The earth is broken up, the earth is split asunder, the earth is thoroughly shaken. The earth reels like a drunkard, it sways like a hut in the wind; so heavy upon it is the guilt of its rebellion that it fallsnever to rise again. (Isaiah 24:19-20)
You can read the full article of those contradictions on this link:
21- Jesus contradicted
himself in the Bible
Now I do not believe that Jesus ever contradicts himself since he is a consistent and truthful man, however so, the Bible is a lie, therefore the Bible makes Jesus seem this way. http://answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/jesus_contradicts_himself.htm
The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify that what it does is evil.
If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. (John 15:19)
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. (Matthew 10:34)
I have come to bring fire on the earth, (Luke 12:49)
If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. (John 17:16)
And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. (John 8:23)
Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. (John 13:34)
My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. (John 15:12)
"If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sistersyes, even his own lifehe cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)
I could give more reasons as to why I am not a Christian, but I think that will do.
So as we can all see, the Bible is quite a filthy book indeed, and this is what Christianity is based upon, and this is the book Christians believe in, and in order to be Christian, you must believe this book. After giving my reasons, one has to really step back and ask themselves, why would they ever believe in such a book? Any sane person would immediately distance themselves from such a book, only someone who has wilfully turned down their rational thinking would continue to follow such a book. If a Christian is not biased, he will instantly have to leave this belief, the only reason he would remain a Christian is because he/she is biased and cannot think objectively nor rationally. It is the loss of a Christian if they continue on their path, not the loss of the Muslim, nor Allah.
I was born a Muslim, and I will die a Muslim, and I thank the almighty Allah for guiding me to the straight path, which is Islam, which is also the path of all the prophets, including Jesus and Moses. Truth stands clear from falsehood, the Truth lies in the Quran, the falsehood lies in the Bible and Christianity. It is up to you to decide which one is the truth, and judging by what I just posted, it wont be to hard to see which is the truth and which is not the truth, and the Bible of today is definitely not the truth.
Praise Allah and may he continue to guide all the Muslims in this world to the straight path, and may he protect us from the evil cult of Christianity. AMEEN.
Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.
Slavery and Racism in the Bible compared to Justice and Equality in Islam.
X-Rated Pornography in the Bible.
A Muslim's Rebuttals section.
Send your comments.
Back to Main Page.