Search and find articles and topics quickly and accurately! See different advanced ways to search for articles on this site.
A Look At A Christians Problem With The Execution Of Men At Bani Qurayda
There seems to be a Christian who has a problem with the expulsion of Bani Qurayda. Besides the fact that this issue has already been dealt with I just want to address the most important objection, which is the execution of the men of Bani Qaynuqa. First I urge everyone to first read the article I linked to and understand how significant the crime that the Jews committed against the Muslims was and about how it lead to their destruction.
Now when the Muslims finally laid siege to them and defeated them. They did not go ahead and execute everyone. The ones that stuck to the treaty were obviously spared
The siege continued for twenty-five days, during which the Muslims allowed the Jews who had refused to betray the Prophet (peace be upon him) during the Battle of the Ditch to leave and go wherever they wished as a reward for their faithfulness. (Muhammad Al Ghazali, Fiqh-Us-Seerah: Understanding the Life of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), International Islamic Publishing House, p346)
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 280:
Volume 8, Book 74, Number 278:
At that time, anyone who reached the age of puberty was eligible to fight and were thus considered to be warriors. They were only ordered to be executed if they fought against the Muslims that is. I already showed that the ones that stuck to the deal were spared. James Arlandson asks this question
So did all the men and adolescent boys have to be executed and all the women and children enslaved? Could only the leaders not have been executed?
I already showed that NOT ALL were executed. As for those who were, well maybe that would have been possible if the Bani Qurayda surrendered their leaders over to the Muslims! However, they sheltered those criminals, defended them and protected them. They were an obstruction to justice and therefore deserved the same fate as their leaders! Indeed they deserved to be punished
However, Sad did not forget, amid the cries of hope directed towards him, that Islam and its sons, that Madinah, its fruits, crops, its progeny and its sanctuaries were rescued from the vehemence of the attacking forces only by a miracle of Providence. It was the Banu Quraydah and those whom they harboured who had been the instigators and the unholy allies in this war, which had been declared to crush true monotheism and its upholders. Sad did not forget that the Quraydah had broken their treaty and greeted him with a shower of abuse when he went to plead with them to remain faithful. Did he not say to them, I fear for you what happened to the Banu al Nadir or worse than it? Despite this, their reply was Eat your fathers ! (Ibid. p 346)
Ironically the Jews were being judged according to their own law! The very thing that James Arlandson is trying to call brutal and unfair is actually the law that is found in his own Bible !
10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the LORD your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the LORD your God gives you from your enemies
This is what happened. The Muslims offered a treaty with the Bani Quraydah. The Bani Quraydah broke it. They refused to surrender even after they broke the treaty and fought to protect the criminals. Therefore, they were judged with their own law and ironically even the leader who caused all this problem even admits that he deserved such a punishment and that it was the order of God
Huyayy was brought to face his end, and Huyayy, as you know was the germ of these troubles. He looked at the Prophet (PBUH) and said: By God, I do not blame my self for my hostility towards you. Nevertheless, whoever deserts God deserts him. Then he turned to the people and said: O people, I have nothing against the order of God. He has decreed slaughter for the Children of Israel! Then he sat down and was beheaded. About this a poet says:
By your life, Ibn Akhtab did not blame himself,
But whoever deserts Allah is deserted
He fought until he reached his limit,
And stirred up trouble,
And every trouble maker seeks glory
(Ibid. p 348)
To most people it could appear that the punishment that the Jews faced was too extreme. However, on the contrary what was more extreme is how the Jews deceptively tricked the Muslims by breaking the treaty and wanted to end their very existence. For such treachery they indeed deserved what they got. If any Christian wants to condemn this judgment then he is actually condemning his own Bible because it was by a law found in their Bible that the Jews were judged by. Plus it was not Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) who issued the order it was Saad bin Muadh whom the Jews selected to judge their fate.
The Muslims needed to make examples out of these people. You cant expect Muslims to go and forgive those who fight against them. That would just encourage more people to go and fight against the Muslims. If you think about it, the Muslims resorted to such extreme measures only when it was necessary. Not only for revenge. It was necessary to show everyone that you cannot go and mess with Muslims by fighting against them.
Read about how the Prophet and Muslims were very forgiving at times to their enemies here. So the Muslims only resorted to fighting when it was deemed necessary. If they were truly butchers they would have done it all the time.
Back to My Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.
Women in Islam and the Bible.
Rebuttals by Bassam Zawadi.
Islam and the Noble Quran - Questions and Answers.
Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible.
Questions about Jesus that trinitarian Christians don't have logical answers for.
What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth? and Why?
"Allah" was GOD Almighty's original Name in the Bible according to the Hebrew and Aramaic sources.
Scientific Miracles in Islam and the Noble Quran.
Most of the Bible's books and gospels were written by mysterious people!
Jesus mentioned Muhammad by the name in the Bible.
Did Isaiah 53 really prophesies about the crucifixion of Jesus? It supports Islam's claims about Jesus peace be upon him never died on the cross. I also addressed John 19:36-37 from the Bible and proved that Jesus never got crucified, since GOD Almighty promised that he will protect Jesus' body and not let even a single bone be broken. My question to all Christians is: How in the world is it possible for the feet to get nailed on the cross without any penetration to the bones by the nails, hence breaking part of the feet's bones?! I also added refutations to Exodus 12:46, Numbers 9:12, Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 34:20, which supposedly prove the Christians' belief about Jesus crucifixion. I proved that this dogma has no truth what so ever and exposed the wrong Trinitarian English translation of Zechariah 12:10.
Send your comments.
Back to Main Page.