Allah Almighty also promised in several Divine Prophecies that He will show the Glorious Quran's Miracles to mankind:
1- The root letters for "message" and all of its derivatives occur
513times throughout the Glorious Quran. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the Prophets' and Messengers' actual names (Muhammad, Moses, Noah, Abraham, Lot etc....) were also all mentioned 513 times in the Glorious Quran. The detailed breakdown of all of this is thoroughly listed here. This Miracle is covered in 100s (hundreds) of Noble Verses.
2- Allah Almighty said that Prophet Noah lived for
950 years. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the entire Noble Surah (chapter Noah) is exactly written in 950 Letters. You can thoroughly see the accurate count in the scanned images.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying spirit
1- When were the earliest writings of the New
Testament?
"The earliest extant
fragment of the New Testament is the Rylands Library
Papyrus P52, a piece of
the
Gospel of John dated
to the first half of the
2nd century."
(Dating the Bible - Wikipedia)
2- What year is the earliest manuscripts of the
New Testament?
"The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear
around 200,
and the earliest complete copy of the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus dates
to the
4th century."
(Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia)
According to Islam, there is
no book called "Bible". It is a man-made lie. See the sections below
for ample proofs. But let us look at what the bible itself says about
itself:
Jeremiah 8:8
(NRSV)
8 How can you say, “We
are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us,” when, in fact, the
false pen
of the scribes
(scribes are writers and copiers of man-made bibles)
has made it
into a lie.
Jeremiah 8:8
8 “‘How can you say, “We are wise, for we have the law of the Lord,” when
actually the lying pen of the
scribes
has handled it
falsely?
False pen or lying pen is the false writings of the
writers and copiers of the bibles' history, stories, and accounts, apocryphas
and talmuds, i.e., scribes.
Isaiah
48:8
8
Yea,
thou
heardest
not;
yea,
thou
knewest
not,
yea,
from
that
time
that
thine
ear
was
not
opened;
for
I
knew
that
thou
wouldestdeal
very
treacherouslyand
wast
called
a
transgressorfrom
the
womb.
Examples:
Examples of where the bibles'
stories are full of lies:
Bible says that Jews from their essence
were liars. From
their "birth" they
were liars writing lies the Old Testament declares
them. The Bible is full of man-made corruption and
fabrications especially in the Jews' ancient history and
stories. Their writings were written with the "lying
pens of the scribes".
Rebecca's
story and the
goat skin lie to
fool Isaac,
who was blind at the time, and many others in the Bible prove
that the Bible is filled with
lying
spirits
(GOD sends them in the OT to false people & prophets to further
lead them astray.
See:
1 Samuel 19:9, 1 Kings 22:22-23, 2 Chronicles 18:21 and others) inspirations and not
Holy Spirit ones.
This is why we say there is nothing called "Bible". It is a man-made book and lie. It is nothing but a compilation of text and history, much of which is filled with
fabrications and corruption, even according to the Bibles' own theologians. See what they say in
great details about the corruption and fabrications that the Bibles are filled with. GOD Almighty commanded the Jews to NEVER mix
His Commandments with any other text (Jeremiah 31:31–34, Isaiah 42:10-13, Deuteronomy 18:18: The Jews'
Covenant will expire and will be replaced with the Gentiles' one from Arabia). Having any Bible upheld as the Holy and Pure Word of GOD Almighty is a direct violation to the
Commandments of GOD Almighty (Jeremiah 31:31–34, Isaiah 42:10-13, Deuteronomy 18:18: The Jews'
Covenant will expire and will be replaced with the Gentiles' one from Arabia).
3-
The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered"
with ample quotations: (Source).
Therefore, trinity and all its faulty analysis are utter nonsense:
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying spirit
1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels'
corruptions.
2- So who wrote the Bible then? Were they really the original Prophets and
Disciples? 3- The New Testament was written in the 4th century by Constantine and
his council by their own words.
4-
The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia
admits that the Biblehad been "altered"[4].
5- Contradictions in historical claims and
accounts.
6- Conclusion.
7- Further Sites to Research.
8- Book Information (Bibliography).
1-
Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions:
Below, we'll also see that the New
Testamanet's gospels and books were written around between
80 to 300 years after the
departure of Jesus.
Unknown dates
and authors?
Keep in mind also that shortly after Jesus,
10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged.
Below, you'll see that the Bible's books and gospels were:
Do contain alterations, fables and man-made
injections in them.
Written by mysterious men.
Written by an unknown number of men.
Written in unknown places.
Written in unknown dates.
Paul never even met Jesus Christ in person while
the latter was on earth. It is falsely claimed that Jesus appeared to
Paul while Paul was on his way to Damascus after the "crucifixion" (Acts
9:2-4. Note: Paul's name used
to be Saul. Yet, Paul admittedly
wasn't
even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspirning him or not).
None of the disciples, even in the false writings
attributed to them, ever claimed that their writings were inspired or
Divine. Not only that, but we even ironically see that:
Also keep in mind that the Bibles'
words are marred with lies:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
The Gospel of John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"Many scholars of the
past two centuries have denied
that John wrote this book,
partly because of their belief that
the author fabricated many details
such as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus.
(The Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN:
978-1-58640-275-4, Gospel of John, Page1540)"
"Critical Analysis
makes it difficult to accept
the idea that the gospel as it now stands was written by one person.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4,
Page 1136)"
"Within the gospel itself there are also some
inconsistencies.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1136)"
"To solve these problems, scholars have proposed
various rearrangements that would produce a smoother order. However, most
have come to the conclusion that the inconsistencies were probably
produced by subsequent editing in which homogeneous materials were added
to a shorter original.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1136)"
"Other difficulties for any theory of eyewitness
authorship of the gospel in its present form are presented by its highly
developed theology and by certain elements of its literary style.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4,
Page 1136)"
"The gospel contains many details about Jesus not
found in the synoptic gospels.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1136)"
"The final editing of the gospel and
arrangement in its present form probably dates from between A.D. 90 and 100.
Traditionally, Ephesus has been favored as the place of composition,
though many support a location in Syria, perhaps the city of Antioch, while some
have suggested other places, including Alexandria.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4,
Page 1136)"
3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming
troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the
writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then
it is important to point out the
following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last
and concluding chapter:
John 21:24-25
24 This is the disciple who testifies to these
things and who wrote them down.
We know that his testimony is true.
25 Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down,
I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would
be written.
"We know that
his testimony is true"?!
Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John?
How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is
true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was
written by an unknown person?
Below in this article, we see:
The Gospel of 1 John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its
author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the
church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"
"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
1 John forgeries:
1 John forgeries by church
fathers:
The same case where no author is really known exists in theGospels of 2 and 3 John.
It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by
Christians against Muslims fail!
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any
other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him
be accursed.
(Galatians 1:8)
Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the
Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son.
(1 John 2:22)
Here's the sucker punch!
1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel
from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest
manuscript dates back to the
3rd centuryP46 .
We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct
evidence that Paul wrote it.
2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is
the antichrist.
This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest
manuscript dates back to the
4th centuryGA
01, א - Codex Sinaiticus.
We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct
evidence that John wrote it.
How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims
don’t even go back to the "alleged authors".
So again, no one knows regarding the "Gospel of John":
Who wrote it.
How many people wrote it.
When it was written.
Where it was written.
Also, when one reads this gospel, he would immediately notice that it was not written by John
himself. Christians say that it was John the Apostle writting about John
the Baptist. The evidence in the quotes above clearly proves that this is a desperate
lie!
I submit to you that neither John wrote anything! Let us look at the following verses from the gospel:
"And this is the record of John,
when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:19)"
"John answered them, saying, I
baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:26)"
"For John was not yet cast into prison. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:24)"
etc...
Whoever wrote the gospel, was he appointed or inspired by GOD Almighty? If yes,
then who is that man? It can't be John for it is quite obvious from the above verses
and many more throughout the gospel that John wasn't the original author. One has to
be ridiculously biased and blind in faith to deny that.
So now, what about these most popular verses:
"In the beginning was the Word, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was was God
was with authority
(the same Greek word used for
satan's rule [2]
[3]).
(From the King James Version Bible, John 1:1)"
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten
Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:16)"
These verses were obviously written by mysterious men and not by any of Jesus' original
disciples. Therefore, it is blasphemy to consider such verses as Divine and to try
to prove Jesus is the Creator of the Universe through them. The lie of trinity was
born between the years of 150 to 300. It is quite possible and highly probable that
some church wrote the so-called "Gospel of John" from excerpts that they found.
Notice that there are 24,000 "letters" or papers found that were not included in
today's New Testament, which means that the excerpts that were used for writing
the "Gospel of John" and all of the other books and gospels of the NT are highly
doubtful and contain no proof what so ever that they were written by any of Jesus'
original disciples. The Gospel of John was written about John but not
by the original "Saint John". Big difference and big corruption! You
can't consider such rubbish as GOD Almighty's Divine Holy Words.
Again, please visit: The
Gospel of John, Gospel or gossip? to see proof about
early Christians rejecting the so-called Gospel of John. They believed it was all
man-made.
Hebrews
5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible!According to the documentary film,
"Banned
from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the
current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get
crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part
also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are
the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among
Christians during the 2nd century. They believed
"it was spiritually
inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts
about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as
"the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD
Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell
get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD
Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to
their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell"
to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of
Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the
Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven
to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit:
Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Again,
the New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and
for lawful things to become sinful. This in itself is a blasphemy against
GOD Almighty.
The New Testament gives warnings about the
infestation of
existing false prophets and messiahs
[1]
at the time. The analysis below clearly show that the false "Jesus" of the
full-of-fabrications, the corrupt Bible, is not what
Isa (eesa), the true Messiah and the son of our virgin mother Mary, is.
Peace and blessings be upon Isa and his mother. We believe in the virgin
birth of the Messiah, and we believe he will return to fight the armies of
satan. Both the Bible and Islam agree that he will return as an Arab
[2]
from Damascus, Syria.
Baptist called
Jesus a liar!
The
infestation gets even more ridiculous
when we read from the NT that John the
Baptist, the supposed great Prophet, called
Jesus a liar before he died:
Yes,
John the Baptist died disbelieving in Jesus.
The Gospel of Matthew:
"The unknown author, whom we shall
continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience, drew no only up
the Gospel according to Mark but upon a large body of material (principally,
sayings of Jesus) not found in Mk that corresponds, sometimes exactly, to
material found also in the Gospel according to Luke.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1008)"
"As for the place where the gospel was
composed, a plausible suggestion is that it was Antioch, the
capital of the Roman province of Syria. (The
New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1009)"
So we clearly see, both the author or authors and the place of
composition of the "Gospel of Matthew" are unknown.
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent
Jesus
to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Simply put: Matthew
28:19 "Therefore, go,
teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit"
had no existence
on the face of the earth prior to year
325 AD. It was a
forgery created by early Church fathers and writers, like much of the New
Testament's text:
This is the primary problem with this
war on GOD
that is called "Christianity". Most of its scriptures were forged and
written 100s of years
after Jesus' departure. Many Bible commentaries say and confirm that most
of the
Bible's books and gospels were:
Do contain alterations, fables and man-made
injections in them.
Written by mysterious men.
Written by an unknown number of men.
Written in unknown places.
Written in unknown dates.
I have
thorough quote on this at:
Unknown dates
and authors?
Keep in mind also that shortly after Jesus,
10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged.
Below, you'll see that the Bible's books and gospels were:
Do contain alterations, fables and man-made
injections in them.
Written by mysterious men.
Written by an unknown number of men.
Written in unknown places.
Written in unknown dates.
Paul never even met Jesus Christ in person while
the latter was on earth. It is falsely claimed that Jesus appeared to
Paul while Paul was on his way to Damascus after the "crucifixion" (Acts
9:2-4. Note: Paul's name used
to be Saul. Yet, Paul admittedly
wasn't
even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspirning him or not).
None of the disciples, even in the false writings
attributed to them, ever claimed that their writings were inspired or
Divine. Not only that, but we even ironically see that:
Also keep in mind that the Bibles'
words are marred with lies:
When it came to collecting money,
the Holy Spirit was all over the place (Acts 5). But when it came to selecting
the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias via a
game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result
of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy
Spirit was supposedly there from the first place. So why
couldn't It just speak Matthias' name and be done with it?
Why the game of chance
at all? We read:
Matthew 10:20
for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
VS.
Acts 1 23 So they nominated two men: Joseph called Barsabbas (also known as
Justus) and Matthias.
24 Then they prayed, “Lord, you
know everyone’s heart. Show us which of these two you have chosen
25 to take over this apostolic ministry, which Judas left to go
where he belongs.”
26 Then they
cast lots,
and the lot fell to Matthias;
so he was added to the eleven apostles.
They rolled the dice while dismally failing
to just speak Matthias' name. And we're talking about
choosing the Prince of the
12th Divine Throne? As if that is not important enough for
the Holy Spirit?
The New
Testament's
confusing,
incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to
become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful, and for pious
believers to be considered disbelievers, and for disbelievers and
hypocrites to be considered pious believers. This in itself is
a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the
infestation of
existing false prophets and messiahs[1]
at the time.
See also
Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change
time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim about
Christianity passed the test of time, and that the calendar that we
use is based on Jesus' birth. But this exactly fulfills this
prophecy. Time has changed and the Law
has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of
problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become lawful
and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25
25 He shall speak words against the Most High,
and shall wear out the saints of the Most High,
and shall think to
change the times and the law;
and they shall be given into his hand
for a time, times, and half a time.
See also the ample prophecies about
the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Promised a lie?
1- Why couldn't the Holy Spirit say GOD Almighty Chose Matthias?
Were they not filled with the Holy Spirit:
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
Matthew 10:20
for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
Peter and Team vs. Paul and Team:
Galatians 1:6: Paul's gospel is
different from Peter and team's gospel.
Galatians 2:15-16: Why are they
arguing over following the law or not? Why are they
not in agreement of doctrine?
Galatians 2:17-21: Paul condemns all Jewish
Christians including Peter and Barnabas. Yet, Peter and
others were supposedly filled with the Holy Spirit.
2 Corinthians 11:4-5
4 For if someone comes to you and
preaches a Jesus
other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a
different spirit from the one you received, or a
different gospel
from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.
5 But I do not think I am in the least inferior to those
"super-apostles."
Romans 13:3
"Rulers are a threat to evil people only, not
to good people."Man,
just shut up!!
GOD's voice/sound walks in the air. Satan's voice is the lord of the air. See Genesis 3:8, Ephesians 2:2. So the two voices are in never-ending struggle with each other. But it is interesting though that satan's voice is the lord of air. It is also interesting that Paul, who never met Jesus, claimed that Jesus spoke to him through the air on his way to Damascus and appeared as a bright flashing light (Acts 9:3-4). Yet, Paul himself also said: "And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light." (2 Corinthians 11:14)
. So satan is the lord of the light too. So the proof that Jesus appeared to Paul was:
1- Jesus appeared as a voice to Paul. 2- Jesus appeared as a light to Paul. 3- But satan is the LORD of voice and the ANGEL of light.
Also, Paul has thoroughly proven himself to be a false prophet, so much that even several of Jesus' disciples rejected him and he rejected them. This takes us to the point regarding Jesus was a lying spirit that was sent by GOD Almighty to deceive all, as GOD did this in the OT to others:
Isaiah 42:10-13 GOD will sing a New Song from Arabia via the gentile Prophet who will come from the Jews' "brothers" (Deuteronomy 18:18). Also in Jeremiah 31:31–34, it will be a new Covenant different from the one that was given to Moses. . The Ishmaelites are the brothers of the Israelites. Also, only Islam fulfilled Deuteronomy's army of 10,000 Believers (Deuteronomy 33:2). The New Testament also renews this Prophecy and claims it is yet to be fulfilled in the future. Also, Ishmael's Covenant was left for the "later generations".
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Nobody respects me (Paul):
2 Corinthians 11:4-5
4 For if someone comes to you and
preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if
you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or a
different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up
with it easily enough.
5 But I do not think I am in the least
inferior
to those "super-apostles."
This is not about whether you're inferior or not, you
sodomized
son of satan! This is about whether or not you
and the rest of the barfoons from both sides were indeed
inspired by the Holy Spirit or not!
Again, please visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying spirit
Galatians 2:11-12
11 Furthermore, when Kefa came to Antioch,
I opposed him publicly, because
he was clearly
in the wrong.
12 For prior to the arrival of certain people from [the
community headed by] Ya‘akov, he had been eating with the
Gentile believers; but when they came, he withdrew and separated
himself, because he was afraid of the faction who favored
circumcising Gentile believers.
VS.
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
Matthew 10:20 for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
So were they opposing the Holy Spirit in their conflicts?
There are open debates that
remained unsettled between the disciples in the NT.
Yet, they were promised that it would be the Holy Spirit that would
be speaking through their mouths, and not them. Or were they
all just a bunch of frauds that were in it for the money? That
without the money none of them would even be known?
Paul calls the Bible fables and lies:
Titus 1:10-16
10 For there are many unruly and vain
talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: 11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses,
teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. 12 One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the
Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. 13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that
they may be sound in the faith; 14 Not giving heed to
Jewish fables,
and commandments of men,
that turn from the truth. 15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are
defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and
conscience is defiled. 16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him,
being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work
reprobate.
Jewish fables and
commandments of men? The Jewish law is filled with
commandments and traditions that GOD Almighty supposedly
revealed to Moses. Among those is the law of circumcision:
Leviticus 12:3
3 And in the eighth day the flesh of his
foreskin shall be circumcised.
Exodus 12:48
And when a stranger shall sojourn with
thee, and will keep the passover to the Lord, let all his
males be circumcised,
and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one
that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised
person shall eat thereof.
Notice how Paul called
these commandments "Jewish fables, and
commandments of men". Yet, they are supposed to be
GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations to Moses. This is not
about abrogation. This is clear denial of the truthfulness
of the verses above, - that they are nothing more than
man-made lies and
fables. So
here we have the following clash:
1-
The Jewish Law contains fables and commandments of men.
2-
The Jewish law contains lies on GOD Almighty.
3-
The Jewish law is doubtful and corrupt.
4-
Jesus lied
when he said that he did not come to abolish the Jewish law, but
to fulfill it. He obviously did not come to
abolish the man-made lies
and fables:
Matthew 5:17
The Fulfillment of the Law 17 “Do not think that I have come
to
abolish the Law
or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them
but to fulfill them.
5- In Paul's
world Jesus was a liar. Also in Paul's world, the
teachings of the disciples were false and bewitchment:
Galatians 3:1-2 Faith or Works of the Law 1 You foolish Galatians!
Who has
bewitched you?
Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as
crucified. 2 I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive
the Spirit by the
works of
the law,
or by believing what you heard?
6-
There is nothing called "Bible". It is not a Divine Book
from GOD Almighty, since it is a book that is filled with lies
and corruption,
even according to itself.
Again, see also
Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change
time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim
about Christianity passed the test of time, and that the
calendar that we use is based on Jesus' birth. But this
exactly fulfills this prophecy. Time has changed and the
Law
has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of
problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become
lawful and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25
25 He shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and shall think to
change the times and the law; and they shall be given into his hand for a time, times, and half a time.
See also the ample prophecies about the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Fabricated
Bibles:
Allah Almighty Said
in the Noble Quran about the fabricated Bibles:
"Then woe
to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is
from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!-
Woe to them for what their hands do write,
and for the gain they make thereby.
(The
Noble Quran, 2:79)"
Acts 13:52 And the disciples were
filled with joy and with the
Holy
Spirit.
Acts 2:4 All of them were
filled with the
Holy Spirit and began to
speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.
Acts 4:31 After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken.
And they were all
filled with the
Holy Spirit and spoke
the word of God boldly.
2- Why did they have to roll the dice (cast
lot) to randomly select Matthias?
"Is casting
lots gambling?
Casting lots or Drawing of lots may refer to:
Cleromancy, a form of divination. Lottery,
a form of gambling
that involves the drawing of numbers for a prize. Sortition, the
practice of randomly selecting political officials from a larger
pool of candidates." (Source,
2)
3- Isn't this also a form of promoting and/or legitimizing gambling
and sorcery and future telling through rolling the dice nonsense,
since in the Bible the roll of dice was not only legitimate, but it
determined the 12th disciples to replace Judas!
4- So any delusional fool out there could pray in the Name of the
Lord and cast lots and whatever the result is is from GOD Almighty??
5- And who will sit at the Throne in the End? Matthias or Judas?
Also
visit:
Holy Spirit only for Money:
When it came to Collecting Money, the Holy Spirit was
all over the place.
You'll need to read Acts, chapters
3 thru 6.
But here is an example:
Acts 5 Ananias and Sapphira
1 Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property.
2 With his wife’s full knowledge he kept
back part of the money for himself, but brought the
rest and put it at the apostles’ feet.
3 Then Peter said, “Ananias, how is it that
Satan has so filled your heart
that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself
some of the money you received for the land?
4 Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold,
wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such
a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.”
5 When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear
seized all who heard what had happened.
6 Then some young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried
him out and buried him.
So here we have a man who sold a piece of his property and
donated some of it for the cause of GOD Almighty. What was the answer to
his charitable deed? His heart is filled with satan
because he
didn't give all of the money of the property's sale. So obviously, all of the
Christians today, world-wide without any exception, are liars whose
hearts are filled with satan, because they all have possessions
and properties that they hold on to.
The NT has unsettled open debates that their "Holy Spirit" dismally failed to settle for them, such as must the long list of 600+ Jewish Laws be upheld and followed or not? (Jeremiah 31:31–34, Isaiah 42:10-13, Deuteronomy 18:18: The Jews' Covenant will expire and will be replaced with the Gentiles' one from Arabia)> Also, conflicts rose on whether one can eat Kosher meat or not, must men get circumcised, can one eat food offered to idols, and many other issues that the disciples fought each other on.
Look at the irony here:
When it came to collecting money, the Holy Spirit was all over the
place. But when it came to selecting
the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias by a
game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result
of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy Spirit was
SUPPOSEDLY THERE from the first place! So why couldn't It just
speak Matthias' name and be done with it?? The reason this didn't
happen is:
1- Because they didn't have the Holy Spirit.
2- They couldn't agree on which candidate to choose as the
twelfth
disciple, because their heads were empty and were never filled with
the Holy Spirit.
3- GOD Almighty
would NEVER speak through rolling dice garbage, because it would
only add more suspicion and confusion. It undercuts the
credibility of the disciples.
4- The authors of the Bible have lied on Jesus and his disciples
and their history. Even the Bible's own
theologians and historians
admit that the Bible's books and gospels:
(a)- Were written by
unknown people.
(b)- In unknown places.
(c)- In unknown dates.
(d)- By unknown number of people.
"Then woe
to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is
from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!-
Woe to them for what their hands do write,
and for the gain they make thereby.
(The
Noble Quran, 2:79)"
All Thanks, Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty for
the Favor of Islam, I don't have to believe in hoaxes! The
Glorious Quran is thoroughly proven to be a Divine Miracle from
Allah Almighty. See the Glorious Quran's:
Hoaxes written?
The above clearly demonstrates that there was no Holy Spirit
inspiring the characters mentioned in the Bible's New Testament. I
am not saying all of the NT is false, but most certainly much much
of it is fabricated hoaxes. The most offensive one of them is the
fact that they had to resort to rolling the dice to choose a
disciples? And the result from the
dice roll was from GOD??
This is no less than a blasphemy and an insult on:
1- GOD Almighty.
2- The Holy Spirit.
3- All human logic and intelligence.
Why even need to roll the dice (cast
lot) when you are SUPPOSEDLY filled with the Holy
Spirit?? After all, was it a Spirit or a spit that they were filled
with? And was it GOD Almighty that made the descision or the random
chance of casting lots?
Why were the disciples
disputing on the 12th disciple if the Holy Spirit was supposedly
to the One who chose him?
Why did they have to
"cast lot"
(roll the dice) to choose him when the Holy Spirit
was supposedly standing there to choose him?
Note: They rolled the dice (casted lot)
because they were in dispute over whom to choose as the 12th
disciple:
"Is
casting lots
gambling?
Casting lots or Drawing of lots may refer to: Cleromancy, a form
of divination. Lottery, a form of gambling that involves the drawing of
numbers for a prize. Sortition, the practice of randomly
selecting political officials from a larger pool of candidates."
(Source,
2)
So why were they in
dispute if the Holy Spirit was supposedly there??
Wouldn't the dispute not
be disputing, but rather blaspheming against the Holy Spirit? But then again, the Holy Spirit wasn't
there to choose him. They lied and said It was there, and It
did choose him. It was the roll of the dice (casting the lot)
that determined the 12th disciple,
not the Holy Spirit!
Otherwise, why even roll the dice?
The disciples' martyrdom
hoax is based on legends and false writings that were written
centuries after Christ.
Titus
wholesale slaughter of Israel and Jerusalem
in
year 70 AD created all kinds of martyrdom stories.
And certainly many martyrdom stories were written in Israel and
abroad. Every hero had to be martyred to further
legitimize the cause. And so therefore, many fabricated
stories were invented regarding the disciples to raise their
heroism. Not only that, but all of the Bible's accounts
are highly doubtful. The Bible's own theologians
thoroughly admit this in all of the Bibles' commentaries.
The Bible in both the Old
and New Testaments
***** declares that
Jesus never died on the cross *****.
This is exactly what Islam also declares! This is
demonstrated below and also thoroughly demonstrated at:
All Thanks, Praise and
Glory are due to Allah Almighty for the Favor of Islam, I don't
have to believe in hoaxes! The Glorious Quran is
thoroughly proven to be a Divine Miracle from Allah Almighty.
See the Glorious Quran's:
As'salamu Alaikum everyone,
The Bible says that Jesus Christ had 12 disciples. They're all
listed in
Matthew 10
as follows:
1- Peter (also known as Simon).
2- Andrew.
3- James son of Zebedee.
4- John son of Zebedee.
5- Philip.
6- Bartholomew.
7- Thomas.
8- Matthew.
9- James son of Alphaeus.
10- Thaddaeus.
11- Simon the Zealot.
12- Judas Iscariot.
Just wondering here since we're told in the Bible's New Testament
that Judas Iscariot, one of the 12 disciples, betrayed Jesus:
Matthew 26 17 On the first day of
the Festival of Unleavened Bread, the disciples came to Jesus and
asked, “Where do you want us to make preparations for you to eat the
Passover?”
18 He replied, “Go into the city to a certain man and tell him, ‘The
Teacher says: My appointed time is near. I am going to celebrate the
Passover with my disciples at your house.’”
19 So the disciples did as Jesus had directed them and prepared the
Passover.
20 When evening came, Jesus was reclining at the table with the
Twelve.
21 And while they were eating, he said, “Truly I tell you, one of
you will betray me.”
22 They were very sad and began to say to him one after the other,
“Surely you don’t mean me, Lord?”
23 Jesus replied, “The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl
with me will betray me.
24 The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him.
But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man!
It would be better for him if he had not been born.”
25 Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, “Surely you don’t
mean me, Rabbi?”
Jesus answered, “You have said so.”
Yet, Jesus when he started his ministry with the 12 (including
Judas), he said this:
Matthew 19 23 Then Jesus said to his disciples,
“Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the
kingdom of heaven.
24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye
of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of
God.”
25 When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and
asked, “Who then can be saved?”
26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but
with God all things are possible.”
27 Peter answered him, “We have left everything to follow you! What
then will there be for us?”
28 Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all
things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who
have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes
of Israel.
29 And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father
or mother or wife[e] or children or fields for my sake will receive
a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.
30 But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will
be first.
So, will Judas sit in one of the 12 Thrones? Or will he be
condemned to Hell, since Jesus said woe to him, and it would've been
better for him if he was never born. And if Judas will be condemned
to Hell, then did Jesus lie when he promised Judas one of
the 12 Thrones?
So what do you think?
So what do you, the reader, think? Am I way off? Where am I
going wrong here?
Is Holy Gambling allowed in Christianity?
And was playing a game of chance necessary in choosing the twelfth
disciple? Doesn't this prove that there was indeed a dispute
amongst them on who should've been the 12th disciple? And
since there was NO HOLY
SPIRIT inspiring them, the only way to resolve this was
to cast lots. Don't forget that Jesus promised them that the
Holy Spirit will speak clearly to them without any confusion or
riddle:
John 16
25 I have used examples to explain to you what
I have been talking about. But the time will come when I will
speak to you plainly
about the Father and will no longer use examples like these.
So why couldn't Jesus here just
SPEAK Matthias' name
to be the 12th disciple? Why the use of
the game of chance?
Does it not render him useless and pointless
when
using it to determine who will be the winner (12th disciple)?
The point of Jesus' promise of speaking clearly and plainly and
directly without riddles or examples to his disciples was to prevent
any and all confusion. Yet, we see here a silly game of chance
determining a very important issue in Christianity! The
determination of the 12th disciple should not be done by:
1-
Voting among the disciples.
2-
Or playing a game of chance among the disciples.
This is a thing that GOD Almighty
supposedly has to decide for Himself. After all this is
disciple that WILL SIT AT
THE THRONE OF GOD ALMIGHTY TO JUDGE THE ISRAELITES.
So no game of chance should be allowed. Why use it when they
supposedly had the Holy Spirit speaking clearly and plainly and
directly to them?
Doesn't this look like a fabricated lie
on GOD Almighty to you??
It sure stinks like a rotten dead flesh to me!
The Martyrs Lie:
Were the disciples
martyred?
Some might answer the above
objections by saying that yes GOD Almighty chose the game of chance
to determine the 12th disciple, and the proof for this is the fact
that the disciples were all or most martyred in the cause of
spreading Christianity. So therefore, since they died for what
they believed in, then they certainly have died for something they
very strongly believed was the Truth. And since they all or
many of them did it, then this could not have been a fabricated lie.
Response:
1-
There is not one confirmed fact that any of the disciples was
martyred for his belief. All of these claims of martyrdoms
were written by Church fathers in the 3rd and 4th century.
That's at least 200 years
after Jesus' departure.
"Summary: The
Bible only mentions the deaths of two
apostles, James who was put to death by Herod Agrippa I in 44 AD and
Judas Iscariot who committed suicide shortly after the death of
Christ. The details of the deaths of
three of the apostles (John, the Beloved, Bartholomew and Simon the
Canaanite) are not
known at all, either by tradition or early historians.
The deaths of the other seven apostles are known by tradition or the
writings of early Christian historians. According to traditions and
the Bible, eight of the Apostles died as
Martyrs. At least two of the Apostles,
Peter and Andrew were crucified." (Source)
2-
The Bible declares that Jesus never died:
The
lying spirits from GOD that He sends to
false prophets and their people. Also the Glorious Quran's
4:156-158 ("shubbiha
lahum" (appeared to them) and Christianity's
conjecture) Noble Verses
are thoroughly covered below.
Jesus became a
lying spirit:
2 Chronicles 18:18-22: Jesus was commanded into a
lying spirit along with many other (spirits / angles)
multitudes of Beings on the
right and left of GOD Almighty. The Glorious Quran's 4:156-158 "shubbiha lahum" (appeared to them) is clearly about Allah Almighty tricked them into seeing and believing that Jesus was actually crucified when in actuality he was not. See also below Matthew 27:16-17 about the TWO JESUSES that Pontus Pilate was standing in between them and the ample conjecture and confusion that this has created:
2 Chronicles 18:18-22
18 Micaiah continued, “Therefore hear the word of the
Lord: I saw the Lord sitting on his throne with all the multitudes of heaven standing on
his right and on his left.
19 And the Lord said, ‘Who
(Jesus included)
will entice Ahab king of Israel into attacking Ramoth
Gilead and going to his death there?’ “One suggested this, and another
that.
20 Finally, a
spirit came forward,
stood before the Lord and said, ‘I will entice him.’ “‘By what means?’ the
Lord asked.
21 “‘I will go and be a
deceiving spirit
in the mouths of all his prophets,’ he said. “‘You will succeed in enticing
him,’ said
the Lord. ‘Go and do it.’
22 “So now the Lord has put a deceiving spirit in the mouths of these prophets
of yours. The Lord has decreed disaster for you.”
1 Kings 22:23 "So now the LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouths of all these prophets of yours. The LORD has decreed disaster for you."
GOD despised the Jews:
Many verses
show that the GOD of the bibles greatly despised the Jews. He called them
liars even from their birth. He also said that their writings
of the
bibles are full of lies [2].
And He considered their lives worthless (example: GOD
Almighty killed 70,000 Jews for David's crime in
1 Chronicles 21:8-30).
So GOD sending them a grand lying spirit, Jesus, to thoroughly grow and complete
their lies, and bury them in conjecture and confusion is something suitable for
their doings.
Keep in mind
also that Jesus has the spirit of "fearing GOD" in him. So he was definitely one of the created Spirits from among the "multitudes" of creations that were standing on the "right and left" Hands of GOD Almighty
in
2 Chronicles 18:18
above. See also: Jesus was created from the Word.
Jesus is also
spirit:
Romans 8:9 Anyone who
does not have the
Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.
2 Corinthians 3:17
Now the Lord is the Spirit,
and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent
Jesus
to be Christianity's lying spirit:
Confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic language, riddles and hyperboles falsely
made sinful lawful and
lawful sinful
(ex: pork became
lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of
blasphemies and quackery).
See also
Oxymoron Trinity
(100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter
100s of millions when he returns.. Jesus also spoke in
diversions and not give straight forward answers (ex: him speaking about
resurrection and marriage, which are not related, because marriage
happens in Heaven, not at resurrection), all of this and more
says that Jesus was highly problematic to his followers. Allah Almighty
summed up Christianity in one Word:
"they follow nothing but
conjecture".
This is thoroughly discussed below.
NASB Translation
all (3), better (1), deep (1), earnestly (3), enough (1), even more (1), few*
(1), freely (1), full (1), further (1), further* (3), great (33), greater (4),
greater numbers
(1), greatly (5), hard (2), harshly (1), heartily (1), high price (1), large
(30), large numbers (1), large sums (1),
larger
(1), late* (2), lengthy (1), long (5), longer (1), loudly (1),
majority
(3), many (181), many more (1), many people (1), many subjects (1), many things
(17), many...things (4), more (25), more numerous (1),
most
(8),
most people's
(1), much (50), often (1), plentiful (2), quite (2), several (1), some (1),
something greater (2), strict (1), terrible (1), very (1), very large (1), very
long (1), very much (1).
According to the Gospel of Matthew,
Pontus Pilate was standing between two double-Jesus men:
1- Jesus
Barabbas.
2- Jesus Barabbas.
Yes, both were called "Jesus Barabbas" (Matthew
27:16-17). Barabbas (/bəˈræbəs/; Aramaic:
ישועבראבא Bar ʾAbbaʾ, literally "son of the father").
The first Jesus Barabba was a Jewish revolutionist who killed Roman soldiers
to free his people. The second one is our Jesus Christ. Both had
no known biological fathers.
In the Middle East, if a person's father
is unknown, they call him "son of his/your father".
This title is also used for great warriors and great achievers. Such
heroes
would be called by the people: "You are indeed the son of your father!", since
the hero is
his father's seed.
Bastards are also called that (son of your/his father), and not "bastard",
to not immediately sound insulting to them.
It is no coincidence that Pilate was
standing between two almost "identical twins"
in names and most probably in looks too, on the same day and hour and minute.
You could not have planned it! Two strangers who
were exact in names and most possibly in looks, were to get crucified on the
same day and same hour. Not that the first one is in
February and the other in
September. No:
1. Same year.
2. Same month.
3. Same
day.
4. Same hour.
5. Same exact name.
6. Same looks.
GOD Almighty in the OT also sends lying spirits to the false prophets and their followers to help them grow their lies and misleading. See also Oxymoron Trinity (100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter100s of millions when he returns.. Christianity is a war on GOD Almighty and a polytheist trinitarian paganism. Allah Almighty summed up Christianity in one Word: "they follow nothing but conjecture". This is thoroughly discussed below.
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Clear Divine Purpose played:
There is clearly a Divine Purpose in the
event of the double-Jesus men. This was not a coincident! Ample
passages and proofs are provided in the following links:
The Romans had to
fake his crucifixion due to
Passover issues:
Click to play
video [1].
Matthew 12:40:"shall
be buried deep in the heart of earth for 3 days and nights as Jonah was deep in the belly
of the whale."
Jonah was alive: But Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive!
This Prophecy is a lie!
Jesus laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and
left. He was
never
inside any coffin
nor ever got buried. Also, because 100s
of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the
Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers
were
even denied food due to lack of time.
Jesus never got
crucified: [1]
[2]
[3]
[4].
The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was
saved.
Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty Said in the Glorious Quran:
[004:156] That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge; [004:157] That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Apostle of God";-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) know ledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- [004:158] Nay, God raised him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise;-
Divine Setup for Conjecture:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
"... but so it was made to appear to them..." (Quran 4:157)
Was Jesus Christ Crucified?
At hour 1:00:00 - 1:25:00, Dr. Zakir Naik really sealed this debate and destroyed Christianity!
This is yet another wonderful 3-hour debate and video by Dr. Zakir Naik where he thoroughly demonstrated from the Bible's New Testament that Jesus Christ was never crucified, nor did he ever rise from the dead. This 3-hour debate was between Dr. Zakir Naik and Pastor Rukni.
Psalm 91 promises Jesus will never get hurt or die. Satan in the NT challenged Jesus on Psalm 91. Yashua (salvation) is the last word in Psalm 91, and it also happens to be one of Jesus' names in the New Testament.
Here is my shortened version video. Dr. Naik also provided many more verses than the following ones. But the following verses and points were from my shortened version video. See also this text-debate [2] between me and a Christian brother on my blog. You're welcomed to join in.
Christianity's Salvation Lie:
Because Christianity's scriptures didn't get documented for 200+ years after Jesus, the Church and Christians had developed and invented the crucifixion lie and its requirement to save a person from Hell (by him believing in it), which had been thoroughly proven from both the Bible and the Glorious Quran, to be a fabricated lie [1]. Salvation verses like John 3:16 and others are all forgeries that were invented by liars 100s of years after the real Eesa, the real Messiah. Even in Latin, it is Iesu, and in Greek it is Iesus. Notice here Jesus' statements:
Matthew 9 12 Jesus heard them and answered, “Healthy people don’t need a doctor, but sick people do. 13 Go and learn what the Scriptures mean when they say, ‘Instead of offering sacrifices to me, I want you to be merciful to others.’ I didn’t come to invite good people to be my followers. I came to invite sinners.”
Matthew 5:7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.
Being Merciful to others makes you a good person. And Jesus didn't come for you if you are. Jesus didn't come to invite
merciful and good people. They're already
saved. They need no invitation.
The Christian lie about one must accept that Jesus died on the cross for his/her sins is mandatory for their salvation, and that otherwise they'd be doomed to Hell is thoroughly destroyed in Matthew 9:12-13.
Matthew 9:12-13I have not come for you if you're a merciful Jew.
Three Isaiah 53 translation lies:
Three lies in translations of Isaiah 53, as further elaborated below in this table, that need to be clarified:
1- He was assigned a grave. This doesn't mean he was buried in it, because Jesus was never buried in any grave. He laid on the floor inside a tomb (cave-like structure), got healed and got up and left. He was never inside any coffin nor ever got buried inside the earth.
2- He was pierced for our sins. No, he was hurt (the word is not pierced or stabbed) because of "our"
(Jews only) sins and transgressions. If you drive with your family and get hit by a drunk driver and your baby ends up getting killed, your baby didn't die for his sin. Your baby died BECAUSE of his sin and transgression. Otherwise, you would not have driven on the same road that day if you knew the future.
Also visit:
John 11:50: It is expedient, whether through hook or by crook, that we must convict Jesus
3- In his death. It is talking about his sentencing to death and not actual death. It is also symbolic, because Jesus didn't even stay for 3 hours on the cross and was never killed. Plus, Jesus begged GOD (Matthew 26:36-44) all night to save him from crucifixion and all hurt.
Also on
2 Chronicles 18:18-22, there are also
twenty other Thrones and Mansions and Messiahs. Jesus has a Throne and his
Heaven is his Mansion. Also in Revelations 4 & 5, there are 20 other Thrones and
Mansions. Jesus himself said there are
many Mansions in GOD's
Heaven. Jesus himself said only GOD Alone decides who gets to sit on his
immediate
right and left
from the disciples. The following articles will shed ample more
light on this:
Is Allah the greatest deceiver? Allah Almighty
deceives evil for the sake of Good. See ample
Noble Verses proving this. See also the
lying spirits in the OT that GOD Almighty
sends to false prophets and their followers to make them
continue to lie.
2 Chronicles 18:18-22: Jesus was commanded into a
lying spirit along with many other (spirits / angles)
multitudes of Beings on the Right and Left of GOD Almighty.
The Bibles are all
corrupt. The Glorious Quran also declares them all to be
corrupt. The Glorious Quran also confirms the Messiah,
Eesa
(not Jesus) and his virgin mother, Marium (not Mary), peace be
upon both of them.
According to Islam and also the Jewish Law,
Jews are obligated to keep the holiness of
the Sabbath by not doing any labor work in
it.
In this exchange between Jesus and
the Pharisees from the Jews, we see the two
quacks arguing
and butchering GOD's Sabbath Law:
1 At that particular
time Jesus went through the grainfields on
the Sabbath, and His disciples were hungry
and began to pick the heads of grain and eat
them.
2 But when the Pharisees saw this, they said
to Him, “Look!
Your disciples
are doing what is
unlawful on the Sabbath.”
Totally
False! GOD Almighty commanded
all Jewish land owners to not reap the
corners of their lands, and to keep the
harvest for all passing needy people to
freely eat from them at any day and any time
(Leviticus 19:9-11).
This is to help the Jews be generous and
giving to all needy and hungry, including
locals and "strangers".
So the disciples being hungry and eating
freely on Saturday never violated the do not
labor on the Sabbath Law. It has
nothing to do with labor and doing a
money-making job at all. This was not
a flipping Kosher burgers on Saturday
money-making job.
2-
Jesus' quackery:
Notice how Jesus in his following quackery
response has dismally failed to address
Leviticus 19:9-11
above. It seems that he didn't even
know that this Law even existed:
Matthew 12:11-13
11 But He
(Jesus)
said to them, “What man is there among you
who, if he has only one
sheep
and it falls
into a pit
on the Sabbath, will not take hold of it and
lift it out?
12 How much more valuable then is a man than
a sheep! So it is lawful and permissible to
do good on the Sabbath.”
13 Then He said to the man, “Reach out your
hand!” The man reached out and it was
restored, as normal and healthy as the
other.
There are
multiple contradictions with Yahweh Almighty
Himself in Jesus' response:
1- If your
wife gives birth
on Saturday, or if your village gets
attacked on Saturday, or if your house
catches fire on Saturday, or if your sheep
falls into a well on Saturday, or any other
similar emergency case,
then this work of rescue and relief and
defense would
not be equivalent to flipping Kosher burgers
on Saturday for a money-making job.
Jews had these emergency cases happen to
them countless times on many Sabbaths.
No one was ever ordered to be put to death
because of them. Jesus is clearly a
lying spirit here, because
the example that he gave was an exceptional case of
emergency, and not
a
normal day of work.
His answer to the Jews was
totally off, had nothing to do with the
topic at hand
AT ALL, and he proved himself to be
either a quack or a
lying spirit. that came to
deceive all.
Countless
Jewish women gave birth on Saturday from the
day the Law of the Sabbath was born till
today. No one was ever put to death
because of it. Jews also fought wars
during the Sabbath with disbelievers.
But a good Jewish man collecting wood on
Saturday was ordered to be put to death by
Yahweh Himself in the OT, which takes us to
the following contradiction #2.
2-
Furthermore, Jesus was also wrong on "permissible
to do good on the Sabbath", because a
pious Jewish man was put to death for simply
collecting wood on Saturday in the OT (Numbers
15:32-36).
Yahweh Himself passed the judgment on the
man. Moses, Aaron and the priests were
afraid to pass judgment on the man because
he was a righteous Jew. If he were a
blaspheming one, they would've executed him
and his blood would've been on his head.
Moses would not have gone to Yahweh Almighty
Himself to ask Him for Judgment regarding
the Jewish man.
Jesus
defined
"good"
incorrectly here, because emergency cases
and exceptions were always allowed on the
Sabbath anyway, and Jesus dismally failed to
reference the Law of
Leviticus 19:9-11
above. Jesus' false
example about a
sheep falling into the well
on Saturday was not an example of doing good
as he falsely defined it. It was
rather an exceptional emergency case, which
had nothing to do with the Sabbath Law at
all! Police stations, hospitals,
military being ready and other related
agencies are always allowed to be open and
on alert 24/7 under the Jewish Law; Sabbath
day included. Again, countless Jewish
women gave birth on Saturday from the day
the Law of the Sabbath was born till today.
No one was ever put to death because of it.
Jews also fought wars during the Sabbath
with disbelievers. By the way, Jesus never really allowed the breaking of the Sabbath; exactly like he never allowed pork meat, nor ever forbade polygamy and many other examples of Christian falsehood and quackery. It was Jesus' lying spirt , through his twisted ways of speaking, that clearly and thoroughly misled Christians by creating the false pagan and polytheistic religion of Christianity, which takes us to the following contradiction.
3-
The polytheist trinitarian pagans ate the
lying spirit's
lie whole! All of them from the birth
of his lie and till this day are all
Sabbath
breakers; a Law from the many Laws
that Jesus supposedly did not come to
abolish.
And the polytheist trinitarian pagans invented Sunday as a Christian
holiday out of further blasphemy and
ignorance. See also section#10
about "Pork and sex oxymoron."
Christianity is a lie and war on GOD
Almighty.
Matthew 12:11-13 is simply a dumb
argument between two
quacks, Jesus vs. Pharisees, arguing about
the Sabbath, and both quacks ended up proving that
they horribly misunderstood what the Sabbath
is. Both presented the stupidest
arguments against the other, and both
resulted in the Sabbath being permanently
lost among Christians, which further proves
that Christianity is a false religion that
was inspired by the
lying spirits that GOD Almighty
sends to false people in the OT. Keep
in mind also that people in the NT also
called Jesus a "fat
drunk". So either he was a
charlatan pretending to be the Messiah, or
he was a
lying spirit. In
either case, Christianity is a false
religion from Hell.
=
War on GOD
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying spirit
Jews are
commanded, and are still till this day, to
keep their Sabbath:
[004:154]
At that time We made a covenant with them.
We caused Mount ‘Toor’ to protrude and hang
over them. We said to them, “Go through the
gate (in humility, bowing down) in
prostration.” We said to them, “Do
not exceed (or side step) the
limits of the Sabbath-laws.”
We took a
sacred (inviolable) covenant
from them.
See also the ample prophecies, from the
previous Scriptures, about the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Islam's Divine Miracles:
3-
Not only that, but Israel has faced a major
wholesale slaughter by
Titus and his army
in year 70 AD.
So many had died just for being Jews. And all of the disciples
of Jesus were Jewish. And certainly many martyrdom stories
were written in Israel and abroad. Every hero had to be
martyred to further legitimize the cause. And so therefore,
many fabricated stories were invented regarding the disciples to
raise their heroism. Not only that, but all of the Bible's
accounts are highly doubtful. The Bible's own theologians
thoroughly admit this in all of the Bibles' commentaries:
So now based on what objective grounds should we reject the claim about the
Bible's New Testament's accounts being mostly false and fabricated by men?
4-
Islam's Divine Miracles:
Take care,
Osama Abdallah
The Gospel of Mark:
This gospel is the oldest and is supposedly the most original
one in the New Testament.
"Although the book is anonymous, apart from the ancient heading
"According to Mark" in manuscripts,
it has traditionally been assigned to John
Mark, in whose mother's house (at Jerusalem) Christians assembled.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1064)"
"Although there is no direct internal evidence of authorship, it was the unanimous
testimony of the early church that this Gospel was written by John Mark. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1488)"
"Traditionally, the gospel is said to have been
written shortly before A.D. 70 in Rome, at a time of impending
persecution and when destruction loomed over Jerusalem.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1064)"
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these
verses belong to the Gospel of Mark.
They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of
vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His
Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost.
(From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"
"This verse, which reads, "But if you do not forgive,
neither will your heavenly Father forgive your transgressions," is omitted
in the best manuscripts. (The New
American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1081)"
"This passage, termed the Longer Ending to the Marcan
gospel by comparison with a much briefer conclusion found in some less
important manuscripts, has traditionally been accepted as a canonical
part of the gospel and was defined as such by the Council of Trent. Early
citations of it by the Fathers indicate that it was composed by the second
century, although vocabulary and style indicate that it was written by
someone other than Mark. (The New
American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1088)"
So, in reality, we don't really know whether Mark was the sole author of this Gospel or
not, nor do we know when and where the "gospel" was even written. And since The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years
(depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus, then how are we to know for sure
that the current "Gospel of Mark" wasn't written by some pro of Mark?
The above text reads: "The most reliable early
manuscript and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."
Now my concern to this corruption and 'answer-the-problem-away' statement is that what
are those so-called "reliable early manuscript(s)" and who are the "ancient
witnesses"?
According to the early
Christians' manuscripts, Jesus never got crucified, and trinity is a lie. The so-called
"gospel of Mark", along with all of the "gospels" of the NT, were
written by third-party narration, as clearly demonstrated and shown in the sections below.
People wrote on the tongue of Jesus' Disciples those books. They are neither
original nor are the Pure Word of GOD Almighty.
If the "gospel of Mark" was indeed Divine and from GOD Almighty, then we wouldn't have this corruption, that they're admitting above, in it.
I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE
for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!
Further regarding this Gospel, we read the following commentary about
Mark 16:9-20:
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these
verses belong to the Gospel of Mark.
They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of
vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His
Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost.
(From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"
This quote raises a very serious issue here. First of all, as we've seen above in
the first quote, we have no evidence that proves that John Mark was the sole author of
this so called "Gospel". Second of all, we see that this Gospel has some
serious problems/suspicions in it. The issue of Mark 16:9-20 is a scary one, because
many Christian cults today use poisonous snakes in their worship and end up dying.
Removing Mark 16:9-20 is quite appreciated by me personally (to be quite honest with
you), because it prevents people from dying from snake bites. But however, the
serious issue of man's corruption of the Bible remains.
We can be absolutely certain now that the above quotes prove without a doubt that the
Bible is doubtful. The quote "or its original ending has
been lost" proves that what we call today "Gospels" were not written
by their original authors such as Mark, John, Matthew, etc... It proves that the
Gospel had been tampered with by man. Let alone considering it as the True Living
Words of GOD Almighty.
If John Mark wasn't the one who wrote Mark 16:9-20, then who did? And how can you prove
the ownership of the other person? Let alone proving that it was GOD Almighty's
Revelation. And as we saw in the first quote above, we don't even know that John
Mark was indeed the one who wrote the so called "Gospel of Mark".
To say the least in our case here, we now have enough evidence to discard the entire
Gospel of Mark from the Bible, because you can't take bits and pieces of it and say some
of it belongs to him and some of it doesn't! Let alone considering the entire
corrupted Gospel as the True Living Word of GOD Almighty, which is a complete blasphemy.
Here is an email that I received from a Christian
regarding
Mark 16:17-18. Emphasis
below are mine:
From: R.Mercer
To: Osama Abdallah
Subject: I Totally Agree
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:41:57 -0700
"What credibility does Christianity have when it scriptures are
littered
with such dangerous and obvious forgeries?"
You summed it up very well on your web page. That is my question
entirely. Just what are we to believe? If forgeries have been proven to
exist in the Bible, then how many more must there be? What about the
chapters and verses we all guide our whole life/styles by? Are they
forgeries, too?
This verse in Mark 16:17-18, has always bothered me. I have, and
still do believe the rest of that passage (laying on of hands, healing
the sick,...), so how can that part of the passage be true when the
serpent part is forged?
I know the part on drinking any poison says "IF", but the part on
taking up serpents says "SHALL", which has always been a problem for me
to believe. Imagine us all being forced to take up serpents in order to
serve God.
On the other hand, if this was forged, then that creates an even
bigger concern for me. Not knowing what text in our Bible is authentic
and what is not.
Thanks for letting me take up so much of your time. Like I said
before, this passage always bothered me, probably more so than any other.
Thanks, once again. Good Day.
The Book of 1 and 2 Peter:
"Some modern scholars on the basis of a number of
features that they consider incompatible with Petrine authenticity, regard the
letter as the work of a later Christian writer.
Such features include the cultivated Greek in which it is written, difficult to
attribute to a Galilean fisherman, together with its use of the Greek Septuagint
translation when citing the Old Testament; the similarity in both thought and
expression to the Pauline literature; and the allusions to widespread
persecution of Christians, which did not occur until at least the reign of
Domitian (A.D. 81-96). In this view the letter would date from the
end of the first century or even the beginning of the second, when
there is evidence for persecution of Christians in Asia Minor.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1348)"
"Nevertheless, acceptance of 2 Peter into the New
Testament canon met with great resistance in the early church.
The oldest certain reference to it comes from Origen in the early third century.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4,
Page 1354)"
"Among modern scholars there is wide agreement that 2
Peter is a pseudonymous work, i.e., one written by a later author who
attributed it to Peter.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1354)"
So like the rest of the books and gospels of the Bible, we don't even know
regarding 1 Peter:
Who wrote it.
How many people wrote it.
When it was written.
Where it was written.
The Book of Acts:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside
the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the
author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary
[1], page
1643)"
So based on some conclusion, you're willing to die for defending the idea that the Book
of Acts was the True Word of GOD Almighty? If the book was inspired by GOD Almighty, then
how come it wasn't mentioned in the book itself to help us filter it out from the many
other "Satanic false books"? Are we sure that this book too is not a man-made
Satanic book?
After all, its just a conclusion, isn't it?
Beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even
documented on paper until 80-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after
Jesus. So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would
know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering it
as the True Living Word of GOD.
Hebrews
5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible!According to the documentary film,
"Banned
from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the
current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get
crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part
also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are
the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among
Christians during the 2nd century. They believed
"it was spiritually
inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts
about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as
"the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD
Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell
get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD
Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to
their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell"
to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of
Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the
Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven
to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit:
Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
"The identification of Luke as the author is
primarily based on the "we" passages in Acts (beginning in Acts 16:10),
which indicate that Luke was associated with Paul in his ministry and wrote down
the account of his activities. (The Amplified
Bible, Page 1153)"
The only proof that they have about Luke being the sole author of this gospel
is a weak speculation on "we". This is absurd at best!
This speculation shows:
The gospel was likely to have been altered or written by others
beside Luke.
It's place of documentation is unknown.
It's date of documentation is also unknown.
It is also worth mentioning that the author of the book of Acts is also
unknown as shown above:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside
the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the
author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary
[1], page
1643)"
So their whole speculation is
absurd at best!
There is a serious forgery about Jesus' "resurrection on the
third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't! Let
us look at Luke 24:44-48 from the NIV Bibles:
Luke 24
44 He said to them, "This is what I told you while I
was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of
Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms."
45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
46 He told them, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and
rise from the dead on the third day,
47 and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all
nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 You are witnesses of these things.
Luke 24:44-48 says that it is written in the Law of Moses (i.e., the Torah) that Jesus
will die and resurrect on the third day. Where in the entire Old Testament (not just
in the 5 books of Moses that make up the Law of Moses or the Torah) do you have that?!
Show me one Old Testament verse that prophesized about Jesus' third day
resurrection?
In fact, in my article Answering Isaiah 53, I clearly proved that the Old
Testament actually confirms the Noble Quran's claims about Jesus never got
crucified! Let alone dying and resurrecting on the third day!
Anyway, Let us see what the NIV Bible's theologians said about this book:
"The author's name does not appear in the book, but much
unmistakable evidence points to Luke. (From the NIV
Bible Commentary [1], page 1529)"
Again, we don't know for sure whether it was Luke or not who wrote the "Gospel of
Luke" since his name doesn't appear in the Book. The Gospel itself seems to be a
compromising one to the Word of GOD. Let us look at the following:
"Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the
beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus,
(Luke 1:3)"
Few problems with this Gospel from the quote above:
1- The author was not inspired, and knew for sure that he was not inspired by GOD
Almighty to write the Book since he didn't mention about any divine inspiration, and he
said "...since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the
beginning..." Where do we see GOD's inspiration in this?
2- The author wrote it for the purpose of "his most excellent Theophilus."
Since when we compromise GOD Almighty and document His Holy Words for the purpose of other
higher (in rank) human beings?
I say it again, I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are
willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!
Also, beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't
even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to)
after Jesus. So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we
would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone
considering as the True Living Word of GOD.
Further from brother Vipor Poison; may Allah Almighty
always be pleased with him:
Luke 1:3
Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it
seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus,
If Theophilus existed in either the 2nd or the 4th centuries then how could the writer
of this gospel be the same Luke who is supposed to be with Jesus in the 1st century.
Maybe he lived to about 200 years.. :)
From brother Amir
AbdulRahim; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:
The subject of Mankind's Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have
taken a closer look at this subject. Its seems it's not only your site that brings this
subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.
For example, an article in the Catholic Encyclopaedia that you mentioned in regard to
the 'Theophilus' mentioned in Luke's Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of
The Bible? article) testifies to this fact (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm):
"IV. TRANSMISSION OF THE TEXT
No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left
the hands of its author-- all have been in some way altered. The material conditions under
which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440), the little care of the
copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different from the desire of
accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find between various
manuscripts of the same work. To these causes may be added, in regard to the Scriptures,
exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies. To exempt the sacred writings from
ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and it has not
been the will of God to exercise this providence."
Lets just go through that again - "No book of
ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--all have
been in some way altered." All have been in some way altered!
In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any muslim, to follow an
impure book?
When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur'an,
there's no contest!
The Book of Hebrews:
"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he
was obviously well known to the original recipients. (From
the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1856)"
So because the guy was supposedly
"well known
(which we don't really know that for sure anyway)", then would that give us the right to
consider his words as the Words of GOD Almighty?! I am sorry, but I don't really see
the logic behind this! The Book of Hebrews is one of the highly used Books among
Christians. I hear references from it a lot when listening to Christians preaching.
Yet, no one really knows who wrote it!. This is quite ironic, because
Christians use such highly doubtful books in their teachings as if they were the True
Living Words of GOD Almighty. I don't care what you call this, but I call it
blasphemy, because it is the most ridiculous insult to GOD Almighty and His Holy Words
that I have ever seen.
I just hope you see the real cheap quality in the religion of Christianity, with all my
respect due to every Christian reader.
Hebrews
5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible!According to the documentary film,
"Banned
from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the
current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get
crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part
also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are
the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among
Christians during the 2nd century. They believed
"it was spiritually
inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts
about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as
"the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD
Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell
get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD
Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to
their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell"
to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of
Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the
Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven
to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit:
Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its
author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the
church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"
"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming
troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the
writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then
it is important to point out the
following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last
and concluding chapter:
John 21:24-25
24 This is the disciple who testifies to these
things and who wrote them down.
We know that his testimony is true.
25 Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down,
I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would
be written.
"We know that
his testimony is true"?!
Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John?
How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is
true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was
written by an unknown person?
Below in this article, we see:
The Gospel of 1 John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its
author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the
church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"
"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
1 John forgeries:
1 John forgeries by church
fathers:
The same case where no author is really known exists in theGospels of 2 and 3 John.
It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by
Christians against Muslims fail!
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any
other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him
be accursed.
(Galatians 1:8)
Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the
Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son.
(1 John 2:22)
Here's the sucker punch!
1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel
from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest
manuscript dates back to the
3rd centuryP46 .
We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct
evidence that Paul wrote it.
2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is
the antichrist. This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest
manuscript dates back to the
4th centuryGA
01, א - Codex Sinaiticus.
We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct
evidence that John wrote it.
How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims
don’t even go back to the "alleged authors".
when ever i am in a debate christians always
quote me this
1 John 2:18-27
English Standard Version (ESV)
Warning Concerning Antichrists
18 Children, it is the last hour, and as you
have heard that antichrist is coming, so now
many antichrists have come. Therefore we know
that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from
us, but they were not of us; for if they had
been of us, they would have continued with us.
But they went out, that it might become plain
that they all are not of us. 20 But you have
been anointed by the Holy One, and you all have
knowledge.[a] 21 I write to you, not because you
do not know the truth, but because you know it,
and because no lie is of the truth. 22Who
is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the
Christ?This
is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and
the Son. 23 No one who denies the Son has the
Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father
also. 24 Let what you heard from the beginning
abide in you. If what you heard from the
beginning abides in you, then you too will abide
in the Son and in the Father. 25 And this is the
promise that he made to us
Does Muhammad (pbuh) deny Jesus being the messiah?
Does the prophet Muhammad deny the existence of God
and God's servant Jesus?
As'salamu Alaikum dear brothers,
Notice here how Messiah was defined by
the author of the 1 John book to be "Father and Son".
Islam does not deny that Jesus is the Christ, nor does
the Holy Quran deny that the Jews and Christians were
called sons of GOD. The problem is that, like every
exaggerated religion out there, the "Son of GOD" title
became ridiculous over-blown. This is one of the many
things that Islam came to straighten out from the
corruption of the Jews and Christians.
Son of GOD in the
Bible means Servant of GOD.
This is a fact that no Jew or Christian could deny. And
the Servant is not just any servant. He is a servant
"raised to Honor"
as the Holy Quran puts it. That's what son of GOD
means. Taking it beyond this is bordering polytheism
and blasphemy. Please visit:
Similarly, in Judaism,Idolatry
is considered Spiritual Adulteryagainst
GOD Almighty. Now I want you to think about this for a
second. Are we married to Allah Almighty? Absolutely
not. Yet, it is considered spiritual adultery?
Similarly, if you take this beyond metaphor, and start
speaking nonsense about you are married with GOD
Almighty, then you would be bordering blasphemy.
The liar in the 1 John verses, and I am
not saying that they are divine or original or authentic
in anyway, is one who denies Jesus is the Messiah. We
do not deny that Jesus is the Messiah. Therefore, this
title would not apply to us. But the title is messed up
anyway. How
could you be a liareven
if you don't believe Jesus was the Messiah??
Again, another metaphor that doesn't mean anything
actual. What is it that you're lying about?? It's like
one saying
if you're not hindu, then you're a thief!
What kind of a stupid statement is that??
Again, Islam came to fix this stupidity
and put an end to it. The blasphemies and stupidity
stop with Islam! That's the bottom line, my beloveds.
1- Were written by unknown people.
2- Do contain alterations and man-made
injections in them.
3- Were written by an unknown number of
men.
4- Were written in unknown places.
5- Were written in unknown dates.
Here is an example:
We find even more alarming troubles with
the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe
that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as
the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point
out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this
gospel from its last and concluding chapter:
John 21:24-25
24 This is the disciple
(WHICH DISCIPLE?? WHAT IS HIS NAME??)
who testifies to these things and who wrote them down.
We know that his testimony is true
(HOW DO YOU KNOW?? DID YOU EVEN MEET HIM IN PERSON??)
25 Jesus did many other things as well.
If every one of them were written down, I suppose that
even the whole world would not have room for the books
that would be written.
Many have doubted that John even wrote the entire book:
"Many scholars of the past two centuries
have denied that
John wrote this book,partly
because of their belief thatthe
author fabricated many detailssuch
as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus. (The
Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN: 978-1-58640-275-4,
Gospel of John, Page1540)"
Wasn't the disciple John the one who
supposedly wrote the gospel of John?
How can he say about himself that
"we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?!
Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book
was written by an unknown person?
I hope this helps, insha'Allah.
Osama
Abdallah's Post:
And by the way, I know that what I just
wrote was actually all written by mclinkin94, because
somebody had just told me so! I know it. Don't
question it! I was just told that the post wasn't
written by me! Even if it has my name on it, and was
written using my account. It doesn't matter.
mclinkin94 wrote it. I was just told that. I
don't remember if whether I actually wrote it or not.
But I know whoever wrote it, his testimony is true.
Somebody told me so.
Now of course, brother mclinkin94 didn't
write my post. But the point I am making here is that
with this statement uttered by Osama Abdallah, do you
see just how stupid and incompetent, and even a liar (if
not mentally retarded), Osama Abdallah is?? This is all
hypothetical of course :).
This kind of lies and retardedness and
stupidity exist by the bulk in the Bible!
Everyone is supposedly inspired by GOD
Almighty in the Bible, and all of their words are Divine
Revelations. Yet, we find fights among the disciples,
where Peter and other disciples were called"clearly
in the wrong",
and Paul was called a"false
apostle"by
several of the disciples and believers. I've went
through this in my debate at:
http://www.answering-christianity.com/is_the_bible_the_true_word_of_god_june_16_2013.mp4.
Take care,
Osama Abdallah
Walid Shoebat said that Muslims deny the Father and Son, and the Bible in 1 John 2:22 states clearly
that who ever denies that Jesus is the Christ is the liar:
1 John 2:18-27
18 Dear children,
this is the last hour;
and as you have heard that the
antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come.
This is how we know it is the last hour.
19 They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had
belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that
none of them belonged to us.
20 But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and all of you know the truth.[e]
21 I do not write to you because you do not know the truth, but because you do
know it and because no lie comes from the truth.
22 Who is the liar? It is whoever
denies that Jesus is the Christ.Such a person is the
antichrist—denying the Father and the Son.
23 No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has
the Father also.
24 As for you, see that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you.
If it does, you also will remain in the Son and in the Father.
25 And this is what he promised us—eternal life.
26 I am writing these things to you about those who are trying to lead you
astray.
27 As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do
not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things
and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit—just as it has taught you, remain
in him. ......
2- The author himself (of 1 John) makes it clear that he's
writing from his own head without Divine inspirations. Notice his wrong
prediction about his followers living in the "last
hour" and that the reason it is the last hour was because
they've had an epidemic of anti-Christs coming and going during their time.
The Book of Revelation:
"The author of the book calls himself John, who because
of his Christian faith has been exiled to the rocky island of Patmos, a Roman
penal colony. Although he never claims to be John the apostle, he was so
identified by several of the early church Fathers, including Justin, Irenaeus,
Clement of Alexandria, Terullian, Cyprian, and Hippolytus. This
identification, however, was denied by other Fathers, including Denis of
Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nazianzen, and
John Chrysostom. Indeed, vocabulary, grammar, and style
make it
doubtful that the book could have been put into its present form by the
same persons responsible for the fourth gospel.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1373)"
"Four times the author identifies himself as John (1:1,4,9;
22:8).....In the third century, however, an African bishop named Dionysius compared the
language, style and thought of the Apocalypse (Revelation) with that of the other writings
of John and decided that the book could not been written by the apostle of
John. He suggested that the author was a certain John the
Presbyter, whose name appears elsewhere in ancient writings. Although
many today follow Dionysius in his view of authorship, the external evidence seems
overwhelmingly supportive of the traditional view. (From
the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1922)"
Again, we don't know who wrote the Book of Revelation. It is certainly highly
doubtful that it was written by Apostle John. The Theologians and Historians of the
NIV Bible seem to agree with the invalidity of this book from the above quote. So
are you now going to consider the other John's words as the Words and Inspirations of GOD
Almighty?
As we see, the style of writing in the book of Revelation is different from the books
that are believed to be from John which are the Gospel of John, 1 John, 2 John and 3 John.
The book of Revelation's style seems to be closer to John the Presbyter's writings.
This man is known in ancient writings. There are also many Christian
theologians today that hold the same view about the falsety of the book of Revelation.
Isn't this sufficient enough to prove that the book is doubtful?
Notice that in the sections of "Gospel of John"
and "Gospels of 1, 2 & 3 John" above, the
author did not identify himself and it was ASSUMED without actual proofs that it was Saint
John who wrote them. Notice how they said that if he were to identify himself, then
it would be hard for them to explain it.
Now, notice the author in the Book of Revelation does identify himself as John, but he
has a complete different language and style of writing from the other books, which created
much uncertainty about its validity in the Church.
My questions here are: Who
wrote the Books? And is or is not Saint John supposed to identify himself in his
books? And where are his books that have his name on them?
Again, keep in mind that the NT was not even documented on paper until 150 to 300 years
after Jesus (depending on what Christian you talk to). So the dating is way too long
for us to be assuming books to belong to certain people. Let alone considering their
nonsense (contents) as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.
Please visit: Jesus
the "Alpha and Omega". Not only
this quote doesn't prove Jesus as GOD, but it was also written in a book that is
unreliable in later bibles. In the original
Bibles, the quote doesn't even exist!!
Arche of the
Creation of God as Alpha and Omega. The "Alpha
and Omega" doesn't even exist in the original Bibles! It's a
lie that was later inserted by trinitarians. See the historical proofs in the
article. If their site is down, then you can read the article at this link ON MY SITE.
Hebrews
5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible!According to the documentary film, "Banned
from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the
current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get
crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part
also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are
the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among
Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually
inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's
apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation".
Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and
Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period
of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of
Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates
and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to
enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised
that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell.
Please visit:
Hell will
eventually be empty according to Islam.
The Book of Revelation is a very important, probably the most important Book in the
Bible today, because it has prophecies in it of what Christians believe is for our future
today, even though it has nothing to do with our current world. It talks about Jesus
soon (1800 to 2000 years ago) will return (Revelation 22:7). I don't know how soon
is 2000 years to the Bible. All the people that this book was told to had died.
It also talks about the great battle of Gog and Magog fighting the righteous; "and will go out to deceive the nations in the four
corners of the earth [The earth DOES NOT
have four corners and no the earth is not a square or rectangle. It is round almost
like an egg!!]--Gog and Magog--to gather them for battle. In
number they are like the sand on the seashore. (From
the NIV Bible, Revelation 20:8)"
The thing that we need to notice here beside the grave error about the shape of the earth
in this false book (sorry to say that), is that the Gog and Magog existed before.
Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal (Ezekiel 39:1), is the name of the leader and
Magog is the name of his nation (Ezekiel 38 and 39). The Gog and Magog army had
already been defeated and the Noble Quran confirms their story.
There had been historical discoveries that perfectly match the Noble Quran's
claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as the discovery of the "Iron Gates",
and other literature that mentions the Gog and Magog army and location. There is even historical documentation about them which matches the Noble Quran
in London, England.
It is a common Christian answer to say "We support Israel because it is God's promised land to the Jews, and
He will prevail them against the army of Gog and Magog who seems to be mainly an Islamic
army today." They mostly rely on the Book of
Revelation from the Bible to support this claim.
The story of the Gog and Magog army attacking the Jews exists in both the Book of
Ezekiel and the Book of Revelation in the Bible. The Book of Ezekiel which came
literally thousands of years before the Book of Revelation predicted the attack and defeat
of the army of Gog and Magog.
The Noble Quran (The Muslims' Holy Scripture) talks about the army of Gog and Magog in
details and explains the events that ALREADY took place. As I mentioned above, there
had been historical discoveries that perfectly match the Noble Quran's claims regarding
the Gog and Magog, such as the discovery of the "Iron Gates", and other
literature that mentions the Gog and Magog army and location.
The lie (sorry to say that) of the Book of Revelation, however, also predicts the
coming of the army of Gog and Magog. But as I said, the army of Gog and Magog were
ALREADY predicted in the Bible thousands of years before the Book of Revelation.
So, the prediction in the Book of Revelation proves that the writer of the book, lacked
a great deal of knowledge about history, because as I said, the event of the Gog and Magog
battle (i.e., the battle of Armageddon) already happened!
The point is that the Book of Revelation, however, like most of the Bible today seems
to be nothing but a big hoax (sorry to say that). It is very doubtful, but yet
ironically, very important to the Christians of today.
Would you honestly deep inside yourself call nonsense of this kind the True Living
Words of GOD Almighty, especially after knowing that very important early Christian
resources thought "the book could not been written by the
apostle of John"?
Jesus is the
resurrection
(John 11:25), but yet
does not know when
the Hour of the resurrection will
come (Matthew
24:36) [1],
and he had to cry, weep and
beg GOD
to resurrect Lazarus
back to life. And this proves
he is our Creator? And how is
he exactly The Resurrection?
Could Jesus and the disciples
honestly even resurrect or
create a fly
on
their own? This is one of the
Glorious Quran's challenges
to the polytheists from mankind who
insist on deifying flesh and blood,
dust and water, and idols.
All are helpless. All are
worthless when compared to Allah
Almighty.
In the OT, Elisha and
many others also raised the
dead:
2 Kings 4
32 Elisha
arrived at the woman’s house and
went straight to his room, where he
saw the boy’s body on his bed.
33 He walked in, shut the door, and
prayed to the Lord.
34 Then he got on the bed and
stretched out over the
dead body,
with his mouth on the boy’s mouth,
his eyes on his eyes, and his hand
on his hands. As he lay there, the
boy’s body became warm.
35 Elisha got up and walked back and
forth in the room, then he went back
and leaned over the boy’s body. The
boy sneezed seven times and
opened his eyes.
36 Elisha called out to Gehazi,
“Have the boy’s mother come here.”
Gehazi did, and when she was at the
door, Elisha said, “You can take
your son.”
37 She came in and bowed down at
Elisha’s feet. Then she picked up
her son and left.
And Jesus
could not determine who gets to sit on his
right and on his left in
Heaven. Only GOD alone decides this, Jesus said. Visit also:
Did Jesus ever claim to be God? (8 minutes)
John 11:50: It is expedient, whether through hook or by crook, that we must convict Jesus
Video: 1, 2. Sam Shamoun, the trinitarian barfoon, forgot that "GOD IS ONE" is mentioned countless times in his scriptures. Also, Jesus was also called "SLAVE OF GOD" in NT and OT. There is no Divine Son that is part of Allah Almighty. That's one of the several things Islam came to correct:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Muslims honor
the Virgin Birth:
We Muslims
believe in the virgin birth of Isa
Al-Maseeh,
from our mother Mariam, peace be upon them both. We also believe
Isa performed many Miracles. In fact, it was the Christians who doubted the
virgin birth. Islam came to cement it. But Isa (eesa) was
nonetheless a creation of GOD Almighty, and a slave of GOD. Even
the Old Testament calls Jesus "Slave of GOD":
Before we start on the analysis of Paul's Books, we must first
know that Paul who's Books are believed to be inspired by GOD Almighty Himself and who is
a disciple of Jesus peace be upon him never actually met Jesus in person
(Acts
9:2-4.
Note: Paul's name used to be Saul.
Yet, Paul
admittedly
wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit
was inspirning him or not). Jesus had
12 disciples when he was on earth. Paul was not one of them.
Paul calls the Jewish law fables and
lies (Titus 1:10-16):
When it came to collecting money,
the Holy Spirit was all over the place (Acts 5). But when it came to selecting
the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias via a
game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result
of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy
Spirit was supposedly there from the first place. So why
couldn't It just speak Matthias' name and be done with it?
Why the game of chance
at all? We read:
Matthew 10:20
for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
VS.
Acts 1 23 So they nominated two men: Joseph called Barsabbas (also known as
Justus) and Matthias.
24 Then they prayed, “Lord, you
know everyone’s heart. Show us which of these two you have chosen
25 to take over this apostolic ministry, which Judas left to go
where he belongs.”
26 Then they
cast lots,
and the lot fell to Matthias;
so he was added to the eleven apostles.
They rolled the dice while dismally failing
to just speak Matthias' name. And we're talking about
choosing the Prince of the
12th Divine Throne? As if that is not important enough for
the Holy Spirit?
The New
Testament's
confusing,
incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to
become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful, and for pious
believers to be considered disbelievers, and for disbelievers and
hypocrites to be considered pious believers. This in itself is
a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the
infestation of
existing false prophets and messiahs[1]
at the time.
See also
Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change
time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim about
Christianity passed the test of time, and that the calendar that we
use is based on Jesus' birth. But this exactly fulfills this
prophecy. Time has changed and the Law
has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of
problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become lawful
and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25
25 He shall speak words against the Most High,
and shall wear out the saints of the Most High,
and shall think to
change the times and the law;
and they shall be given into his hand
for a time, times, and half a time.
See also the ample prophecies about
the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Promised a lie?
1- Why couldn't the Holy Spirit say GOD Almighty Chose Matthias?
Were they not filled with the Holy Spirit:
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
Matthew 10:20
for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
Peter and Team vs. Paul and Team:
Galatians 1:6: Paul's gospel is
different from Peter and team's gospel.
Galatians 2:15-16: Why are they
arguing over following the law or not? Why are they
not in agreement of doctrine?
Galatians 2:17-21: Paul condemns all Jewish
Christians including Peter and Barnabas. Yet, Peter and
others were supposedly filled with the Holy Spirit.
2 Corinthians 11:4-5
4 For if someone comes to you and
preaches a Jesus
other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a
different spirit from the one you received, or a
different gospel
from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.
5 But I do not think I am in the least inferior to those
"super-apostles."
Romans 13:3
"Rulers are a threat to evil people only, not
to good people."Man,
just shut up!!
GOD's voice/sound walks in the air. Satan's voice is the lord of the air. See Genesis 3:8, Ephesians 2:2. So the two voices are in never-ending struggle with each other. But it is interesting though that satan's voice is the lord of air. It is also interesting that Paul, who never met Jesus, claimed that Jesus spoke to him through the air on his way to Damascus and appeared as a bright flashing light (Acts 9:3-4). Yet, Paul himself also said: "And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light." (2 Corinthians 11:14)
. So satan is the lord of the light too. So the proof that Jesus appeared to Paul was:
1- Jesus appeared as a voice to Paul. 2- Jesus appeared as a light to Paul. 3- But satan is the LORD of voice and the ANGEL of light.
Also, Paul has thoroughly proven himself to be a false prophet, so much that even several of Jesus' disciples rejected him and he rejected them. This takes us to the point regarding Jesus was a lying spirit that was sent by GOD Almighty to deceive all, as GOD did this in the OT to others:
Isaiah 42:10-13 GOD will sing a New Song from Arabia via the gentile Prophet who will come from the Jews' "brothers" (Deuteronomy 18:18). Also in Jeremiah 31:31–34, it will be a new Covenant different from the one that was given to Moses. . The Ishmaelites are the brothers of the Israelites. Also, only Islam fulfilled Deuteronomy's army of 10,000 Believers (Deuteronomy 33:2). The New Testament also renews this Prophecy and claims it is yet to be fulfilled in the future. Also, Ishmael's Covenant was left for the "later generations".
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Nobody respects me (Paul):
2 Corinthians 11:4-5
4 For if someone comes to you and
preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if
you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or a
different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up
with it easily enough.
5 But I do not think I am in the least
inferior
to those "super-apostles."
This is not about whether you're inferior or not, you
sodomized
son of satan! This is about whether or not you
and the rest of the barfoons from both sides were indeed
inspired by the Holy Spirit or not!
Again, please visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying spirit
Galatians 2:11-12
11 Furthermore, when Kefa came to Antioch,
I opposed him publicly, because
he was clearly
in the wrong.
12 For prior to the arrival of certain people from [the
community headed by] Ya‘akov, he had been eating with the
Gentile believers; but when they came, he withdrew and separated
himself, because he was afraid of the faction who favored
circumcising Gentile believers.
VS.
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
Matthew 10:20 for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
So were they opposing the Holy Spirit in their conflicts?
There are open debates that
remained unsettled between the disciples in the NT.
Yet, they were promised that it would be the Holy Spirit that would
be speaking through their mouths, and not them. Or were they
all just a bunch of frauds that were in it for the money? That
without the money none of them would even be known?
Paul calls the Bible fables and lies:
Titus 1:10-16
10 For there are many unruly and vain
talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: 11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses,
teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. 12 One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the
Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. 13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that
they may be sound in the faith; 14 Not giving heed to
Jewish fables,
and commandments of men,
that turn from the truth. 15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are
defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and
conscience is defiled. 16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him,
being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work
reprobate.
Jewish fables and
commandments of men? The Jewish law is filled with
commandments and traditions that GOD Almighty supposedly
revealed to Moses. Among those is the law of circumcision:
Leviticus 12:3
3 And in the eighth day the flesh of his
foreskin shall be circumcised.
Exodus 12:48
And when a stranger shall sojourn with
thee, and will keep the passover to the Lord, let all his
males be circumcised,
and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one
that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised
person shall eat thereof.
Notice how Paul called
these commandments "Jewish fables, and
commandments of men". Yet, they are supposed to be
GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations to Moses. This is not
about abrogation. This is clear denial of the truthfulness
of the verses above, - that they are nothing more than
man-made lies and
fables. So
here we have the following clash:
1-
The Jewish Law contains fables and commandments of men.
2-
The Jewish law contains lies on GOD Almighty.
3-
The Jewish law is doubtful and corrupt.
4-
Jesus lied
when he said that he did not come to abolish the Jewish law, but
to fulfill it. He obviously did not come to
abolish the man-made lies
and fables:
Matthew 5:17
The Fulfillment of the Law 17 “Do not think that I have come
to
abolish the Law
or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them
but to fulfill them.
5- In Paul's
world Jesus was a liar. Also in Paul's world, the
teachings of the disciples were false and bewitchment:
Galatians 3:1-2 Faith or Works of the Law 1 You foolish Galatians!
Who has
bewitched you?
Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as
crucified. 2 I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive
the Spirit by the
works of
the law,
or by believing what you heard?
6-
There is nothing called "Bible". It is not a Divine Book
from GOD Almighty, since it is a book that is filled with lies
and corruption,
even according to itself.
Again, see also
Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change
time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim
about Christianity passed the test of time, and that the
calendar that we use is based on Jesus' birth. But this
exactly fulfills this prophecy. Time has changed and the
Law
has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of
problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become
lawful and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25
25 He shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and shall think to
change the times and the law; and they shall be given into his hand for a time, times, and half a time.
See also the ample prophecies about the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Fabricated
Bibles:
Allah Almighty Said
in the Noble Quran about the fabricated Bibles:
"Then woe
to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is
from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!-
Woe to them for what their hands do write,
and for the gain they make thereby.
(The
Noble Quran, 2:79)"
Acts 13:52 And the disciples were
filled with joy and with the
Holy
Spirit.
Acts 2:4 All of them were
filled with the
Holy Spirit and began to
speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.
Acts 4:31 After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken.
And they were all
filled with the
Holy Spirit and spoke
the word of God boldly.
2- Why did they have to roll the dice (cast
lot) to randomly select Matthias?
"Is casting
lots gambling?
Casting lots or Drawing of lots may refer to:
Cleromancy, a form of divination. Lottery,
a form of gambling
that involves the drawing of numbers for a prize. Sortition, the
practice of randomly selecting political officials from a larger
pool of candidates." (Source,
2)
3- Isn't this also a form of promoting and/or legitimizing gambling
and sorcery and future telling through rolling the dice nonsense,
since in the Bible the roll of dice was not only legitimate, but it
determined the 12th disciples to replace Judas!
4- So any delusional fool out there could pray in the Name of the
Lord and cast lots and whatever the result is is from GOD Almighty??
5- And who will sit at the Throne in the End? Matthias or Judas?
Also
visit:
Holy Spirit only for Money:
When it came to Collecting Money, the Holy Spirit was
all over the place.
You'll need to read Acts, chapters
3 thru 6.
But here is an example:
Acts 5 Ananias and Sapphira
1 Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property.
2 With his wife’s full knowledge he kept
back part of the money for himself, but brought the
rest and put it at the apostles’ feet.
3 Then Peter said, “Ananias, how is it that
Satan has so filled your heart
that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself
some of the money you received for the land?
4 Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold,
wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such
a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.”
5 When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear
seized all who heard what had happened.
6 Then some young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried
him out and buried him.
So here we have a man who sold a piece of his property and
donated some of it for the cause of GOD Almighty. What was the answer to
his charitable deed? His heart is filled with satan
because he
didn't give all of the money of the property's sale. So obviously, all of the
Christians today, world-wide without any exception, are liars whose
hearts are filled with satan, because they all have possessions
and properties that they hold on to.
The NT has unsettled open debates that their "Holy Spirit" dismally failed to settle for them, such as must the long list of 600+ Jewish Laws be upheld and followed or not? (Jeremiah 31:31–34, Isaiah 42:10-13, Deuteronomy 18:18: The Jews' Covenant will expire and will be replaced with the Gentiles' one from Arabia)> Also, conflicts rose on whether one can eat Kosher meat or not, must men get circumcised, can one eat food offered to idols, and many other issues that the disciples fought each other on.
Look at the irony here:
When it came to collecting money, the Holy Spirit was all over the
place. But when it came to selecting
the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias by a
game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result
of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy Spirit was
SUPPOSEDLY THERE from the first place! So why couldn't It just
speak Matthias' name and be done with it?? The reason this didn't
happen is:
1- Because they didn't have the Holy Spirit.
2- They couldn't agree on which candidate to choose as the
twelfth
disciple, because their heads were empty and were never filled with
the Holy Spirit.
3- GOD Almighty
would NEVER speak through rolling dice garbage, because it would
only add more suspicion and confusion. It undercuts the
credibility of the disciples.
4- The authors of the Bible have lied on Jesus and his disciples
and their history. Even the Bible's own
theologians and historians
admit that the Bible's books and gospels:
(a)- Were written by
unknown people.
(b)- In unknown places.
(c)- In unknown dates.
(d)- By unknown number of people.
"Then woe
to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is
from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!-
Woe to them for what their hands do write,
and for the gain they make thereby.
(The
Noble Quran, 2:79)"
All Thanks, Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty for
the Favor of Islam, I don't have to believe in hoaxes! The
Glorious Quran is thoroughly proven to be a Divine Miracle from
Allah Almighty. See the Glorious Quran's:
Hoaxes written?
The above clearly demonstrates that there was no Holy Spirit
inspiring the characters mentioned in the Bible's New Testament. I
am not saying all of the NT is false, but most certainly much much
of it is fabricated hoaxes. The most offensive one of them is the
fact that they had to resort to rolling the dice to choose a
disciples? And the result from the
dice roll was from GOD??
This is no less than a blasphemy and an insult on:
1- GOD Almighty.
2- The Holy Spirit.
3- All human logic and intelligence.
Why even need to roll the dice (cast
lot) when you are SUPPOSEDLY filled with the Holy
Spirit?? After all, was it a Spirit or a spit that they were filled
with? And was it GOD Almighty that made the descision or the random
chance of casting lots?
Why were the disciples
disputing on the 12th disciple if the Holy Spirit was supposedly
to the One who chose him?
Why did they have to
"cast lot"
(roll the dice) to choose him when the Holy Spirit
was supposedly standing there to choose him?
Note: They rolled the dice (casted lot)
because they were in dispute over whom to choose as the 12th
disciple:
"Is
casting lots
gambling?
Casting lots or Drawing of lots may refer to: Cleromancy, a form
of divination. Lottery, a form of gambling that involves the drawing of
numbers for a prize. Sortition, the practice of randomly
selecting political officials from a larger pool of candidates."
(Source,
2)
So why were they in
dispute if the Holy Spirit was supposedly there??
Wouldn't the dispute not
be disputing, but rather blaspheming against the Holy Spirit? But then again, the Holy Spirit wasn't
there to choose him. They lied and said It was there, and It
did choose him. It was the roll of the dice (casting the lot)
that determined the 12th disciple,
not the Holy Spirit!
Otherwise, why even roll the dice?
The disciples' martyrdom
hoax is based on legends and false writings that were written
centuries after Christ.
Titus
wholesale slaughter of Israel and Jerusalem
in
year 70 AD created all kinds of martyrdom stories.
And certainly many martyrdom stories were written in Israel and
abroad. Every hero had to be martyred to further
legitimize the cause. And so therefore, many fabricated
stories were invented regarding the disciples to raise their
heroism. Not only that, but all of the Bible's accounts
are highly doubtful. The Bible's own theologians
thoroughly admit this in all of the Bibles' commentaries.
The Bible in both the Old
and New Testaments
***** declares that
Jesus never died on the cross *****.
This is exactly what Islam also declares! This is
demonstrated below and also thoroughly demonstrated at:
All Thanks, Praise and
Glory are due to Allah Almighty for the Favor of Islam, I don't
have to believe in hoaxes! The Glorious Quran is
thoroughly proven to be a Divine Miracle from Allah Almighty.
See the Glorious Quran's:
As'salamu Alaikum everyone,
The Bible says that Jesus Christ had 12 disciples. They're all
listed in
Matthew 10
as follows:
1- Peter (also known as Simon).
2- Andrew.
3- James son of Zebedee.
4- John son of Zebedee.
5- Philip.
6- Bartholomew.
7- Thomas.
8- Matthew.
9- James son of Alphaeus.
10- Thaddaeus.
11- Simon the Zealot.
12- Judas Iscariot.
Just wondering here since we're told in the Bible's New Testament
that Judas Iscariot, one of the 12 disciples, betrayed Jesus:
Matthew 26 17 On the first day of
the Festival of Unleavened Bread, the disciples came to Jesus and
asked, “Where do you want us to make preparations for you to eat the
Passover?”
18 He replied, “Go into the city to a certain man and tell him, ‘The
Teacher says: My appointed time is near. I am going to celebrate the
Passover with my disciples at your house.’”
19 So the disciples did as Jesus had directed them and prepared the
Passover.
20 When evening came, Jesus was reclining at the table with the
Twelve.
21 And while they were eating, he said, “Truly I tell you, one of
you will betray me.”
22 They were very sad and began to say to him one after the other,
“Surely you don’t mean me, Lord?”
23 Jesus replied, “The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl
with me will betray me.
24 The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him.
But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man!
It would be better for him if he had not been born.”
25 Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, “Surely you don’t
mean me, Rabbi?”
Jesus answered, “You have said so.”
Yet, Jesus when he started his ministry with the 12 (including
Judas), he said this:
Matthew 19 23 Then Jesus said to his disciples,
“Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the
kingdom of heaven.
24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye
of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of
God.”
25 When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and
asked, “Who then can be saved?”
26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but
with God all things are possible.”
27 Peter answered him, “We have left everything to follow you! What
then will there be for us?”
28 Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all
things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who
have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes
of Israel.
29 And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father
or mother or wife[e] or children or fields for my sake will receive
a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.
30 But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will
be first.
So, will Judas sit in one of the 12 Thrones? Or will he be
condemned to Hell, since Jesus said woe to him, and it would've been
better for him if he was never born. And if Judas will be condemned
to Hell, then did Jesus lie when he promised Judas one of
the 12 Thrones?
So what do you think?
So what do you, the reader, think? Am I way off? Where am I
going wrong here?
Is Holy Gambling allowed in Christianity?
And was playing a game of chance necessary in choosing the twelfth
disciple? Doesn't this prove that there was indeed a dispute
amongst them on who should've been the 12th disciple? And
since there was NO HOLY
SPIRIT inspiring them, the only way to resolve this was
to cast lots. Don't forget that Jesus promised them that the
Holy Spirit will speak clearly to them without any confusion or
riddle:
John 16
25 I have used examples to explain to you what
I have been talking about. But the time will come when I will
speak to you plainly
about the Father and will no longer use examples like these.
So why couldn't Jesus here just
SPEAK Matthias' name
to be the 12th disciple? Why the use of
the game of chance?
Does it not render him useless and pointless
when
using it to determine who will be the winner (12th disciple)?
The point of Jesus' promise of speaking clearly and plainly and
directly without riddles or examples to his disciples was to prevent
any and all confusion. Yet, we see here a silly game of chance
determining a very important issue in Christianity! The
determination of the 12th disciple should not be done by:
1-
Voting among the disciples.
2-
Or playing a game of chance among the disciples.
This is a thing that GOD Almighty
supposedly has to decide for Himself. After all this is
disciple that WILL SIT AT
THE THRONE OF GOD ALMIGHTY TO JUDGE THE ISRAELITES.
So no game of chance should be allowed. Why use it when they
supposedly had the Holy Spirit speaking clearly and plainly and
directly to them?
Doesn't this look like a fabricated lie
on GOD Almighty to you??
It sure stinks like a rotten dead flesh to me!
The Martyrs Lie:
Were the disciples
martyred?
Some might answer the above
objections by saying that yes GOD Almighty chose the game of chance
to determine the 12th disciple, and the proof for this is the fact
that the disciples were all or most martyred in the cause of
spreading Christianity. So therefore, since they died for what
they believed in, then they certainly have died for something they
very strongly believed was the Truth. And since they all or
many of them did it, then this could not have been a fabricated lie.
Response:
1-
There is not one confirmed fact that any of the disciples was
martyred for his belief. All of these claims of martyrdoms
were written by Church fathers in the 3rd and 4th century.
That's at least 200 years
after Jesus' departure.
"Summary: The
Bible only mentions the deaths of two
apostles, James who was put to death by Herod Agrippa I in 44 AD and
Judas Iscariot who committed suicide shortly after the death of
Christ. The details of the deaths of
three of the apostles (John, the Beloved, Bartholomew and Simon the
Canaanite) are not
known at all, either by tradition or early historians.
The deaths of the other seven apostles are known by tradition or the
writings of early Christian historians. According to traditions and
the Bible, eight of the Apostles died as
Martyrs. At least two of the Apostles,
Peter and Andrew were crucified." (Source)
2-
The Bible declares that Jesus never died:
The
lying spirits from GOD that He sends to
false prophets and their people. Also the Glorious Quran's
4:156-158 ("shubbiha
lahum" (appeared to them) and Christianity's
conjecture) Noble Verses
are thoroughly covered below.
Jesus became a
lying spirit:
2 Chronicles 18:18-22: Jesus was commanded into a
lying spirit along with many other (spirits / angles)
multitudes of Beings on the
right and left of GOD Almighty. The Glorious Quran's 4:156-158 "shubbiha lahum" (appeared to them) is clearly about Allah Almighty tricked them into seeing and believing that Jesus was actually crucified when in actuality he was not. See also below Matthew 27:16-17 about the TWO JESUSES that Pontus Pilate was standing in between them and the ample conjecture and confusion that this has created:
2 Chronicles 18:18-22
18 Micaiah continued, “Therefore hear the word of the
Lord: I saw the Lord sitting on his throne with all the multitudes of heaven standing on
his right and on his left.
19 And the Lord said, ‘Who
(Jesus included)
will entice Ahab king of Israel into attacking Ramoth
Gilead and going to his death there?’ “One suggested this, and another
that.
20 Finally, a
spirit came forward,
stood before the Lord and said, ‘I will entice him.’ “‘By what means?’ the
Lord asked.
21 “‘I will go and be a
deceiving spirit
in the mouths of all his prophets,’ he said. “‘You will succeed in enticing
him,’ said
the Lord. ‘Go and do it.’
22 “So now the Lord has put a deceiving spirit in the mouths of these prophets
of yours. The Lord has decreed disaster for you.”
1 Kings 22:23 "So now the LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouths of all these prophets of yours. The LORD has decreed disaster for you."
GOD despised the Jews:
Many verses
show that the GOD of the bibles greatly despised the Jews. He called them
liars even from their birth. He also said that their writings
of the
bibles are full of lies [2].
And He considered their lives worthless (example: GOD
Almighty killed 70,000 Jews for David's crime in
1 Chronicles 21:8-30).
So GOD sending them a grand lying spirit, Jesus, to thoroughly grow and complete
their lies, and bury them in conjecture and confusion is something suitable for
their doings.
Keep in mind
also that Jesus has the spirit of "fearing GOD" in him. So he was definitely one of the created Spirits from among the "multitudes" of creations that were standing on the "right and left" Hands of GOD Almighty
in
2 Chronicles 18:18
above. See also: Jesus was created from the Word.
Jesus is also
spirit:
Romans 8:9 Anyone who
does not have the
Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.
2 Corinthians 3:17
Now the Lord is the Spirit,
and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent
Jesus
to be Christianity's lying spirit:
Confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic language, riddles and hyperboles falsely
made sinful lawful and
lawful sinful
(ex: pork became
lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of
blasphemies and quackery).
See also
Oxymoron Trinity
(100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter
100s of millions when he returns.. Jesus also spoke in
diversions and not give straight forward answers (ex: him speaking about
resurrection and marriage, which are not related, because marriage
happens in Heaven, not at resurrection), all of this and more
says that Jesus was highly problematic to his followers. Allah Almighty
summed up Christianity in one Word:
"they follow nothing but
conjecture".
This is thoroughly discussed below.
NASB Translation
all (3), better (1), deep (1), earnestly (3), enough (1), even more (1), few*
(1), freely (1), full (1), further (1), further* (3), great (33), greater (4),
greater numbers
(1), greatly (5), hard (2), harshly (1), heartily (1), high price (1), large
(30), large numbers (1), large sums (1),
larger
(1), late* (2), lengthy (1), long (5), longer (1), loudly (1),
majority
(3), many (181), many more (1), many people (1), many subjects (1), many things
(17), many...things (4), more (25), more numerous (1),
most
(8),
most people's
(1), much (50), often (1), plentiful (2), quite (2), several (1), some (1),
something greater (2), strict (1), terrible (1), very (1), very large (1), very
long (1), very much (1).
According to the Gospel of Matthew,
Pontus Pilate was standing between two double-Jesus men:
1- Jesus
Barabbas.
2- Jesus Barabbas.
Yes, both were called "Jesus Barabbas" (Matthew
27:16-17). Barabbas (/bəˈræbəs/; Aramaic:
ישועבראבא Bar ʾAbbaʾ, literally "son of the father").
The first Jesus Barabba was a Jewish revolutionist who killed Roman soldiers
to free his people. The second one is our Jesus Christ. Both had
no known biological fathers.
In the Middle East, if a person's father
is unknown, they call him "son of his/your father".
This title is also used for great warriors and great achievers. Such
heroes
would be called by the people: "You are indeed the son of your father!", since
the hero is
his father's seed.
Bastards are also called that (son of your/his father), and not "bastard",
to not immediately sound insulting to them.
It is no coincidence that Pilate was
standing between two almost "identical twins"
in names and most probably in looks too, on the same day and hour and minute.
You could not have planned it! Two strangers who
were exact in names and most possibly in looks, were to get crucified on the
same day and same hour. Not that the first one is in
February and the other in
September. No:
1. Same year.
2. Same month.
3. Same
day.
4. Same hour.
5. Same exact name.
6. Same looks.
GOD Almighty in the OT also sends lying spirits to the false prophets and their followers to help them grow their lies and misleading. See also Oxymoron Trinity (100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter100s of millions when he returns.. Christianity is a war on GOD Almighty and a polytheist trinitarian paganism. Allah Almighty summed up Christianity in one Word: "they follow nothing but conjecture". This is thoroughly discussed below.
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Clear Divine Purpose played:
There is clearly a Divine Purpose in the
event of the double-Jesus men. This was not a coincident! Ample
passages and proofs are provided in the following links:
The Romans had to
fake his crucifixion due to
Passover issues:
Click to play
video [1].
Matthew 12:40:"shall
be buried deep in the heart of earth for 3 days and nights as Jonah was deep in the belly
of the whale."
Jonah was alive: But Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive!
This Prophecy is a lie!
Jesus laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and
left. He was
never
inside any coffin
nor ever got buried. Also, because 100s
of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the
Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers
were
even denied food due to lack of time.
Jesus never got
crucified: [1]
[2]
[3]
[4].
The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was
saved.
Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty Said in the Glorious Quran:
[004:156] That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge; [004:157] That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Apostle of God";-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) know ledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- [004:158] Nay, God raised him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise;-
Divine Setup for Conjecture:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
"... but so it was made to appear to them..." (Quran 4:157)
Was Jesus Christ Crucified?
At hour 1:00:00 - 1:25:00, Dr. Zakir Naik really sealed this debate and destroyed Christianity!
This is yet another wonderful 3-hour debate and video by Dr. Zakir Naik where he thoroughly demonstrated from the Bible's New Testament that Jesus Christ was never crucified, nor did he ever rise from the dead. This 3-hour debate was between Dr. Zakir Naik and Pastor Rukni.
Psalm 91 promises Jesus will never get hurt or die. Satan in the NT challenged Jesus on Psalm 91. Yashua (salvation) is the last word in Psalm 91, and it also happens to be one of Jesus' names in the New Testament.
Here is my shortened version video. Dr. Naik also provided many more verses than the following ones. But the following verses and points were from my shortened version video. See also this text-debate [2] between me and a Christian brother on my blog. You're welcomed to join in.
Christianity's Salvation Lie:
Because Christianity's scriptures didn't get documented for 200+ years after Jesus, the Church and Christians had developed and invented the crucifixion lie and its requirement to save a person from Hell (by him believing in it), which had been thoroughly proven from both the Bible and the Glorious Quran, to be a fabricated lie [1]. Salvation verses like John 3:16 and others are all forgeries that were invented by liars 100s of years after the real Eesa, the real Messiah. Even in Latin, it is Iesu, and in Greek it is Iesus. Notice here Jesus' statements:
Matthew 9 12 Jesus heard them and answered, “Healthy people don’t need a doctor, but sick people do. 13 Go and learn what the Scriptures mean when they say, ‘Instead of offering sacrifices to me, I want you to be merciful to others.’ I didn’t come to invite good people to be my followers. I came to invite sinners.”
Matthew 5:7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.
Being Merciful to others makes you a good person. And Jesus didn't come for you if you are. Jesus didn't come to invite
merciful and good people. They're already
saved. They need no invitation.
The Christian lie about one must accept that Jesus died on the cross for his/her sins is mandatory for their salvation, and that otherwise they'd be doomed to Hell is thoroughly destroyed in Matthew 9:12-13.
Matthew 9:12-13I have not come for you if you're a merciful Jew.
Three Isaiah 53 translation lies:
Three lies in translations of Isaiah 53, as further elaborated below in this table, that need to be clarified:
1- He was assigned a grave. This doesn't mean he was buried in it, because Jesus was never buried in any grave. He laid on the floor inside a tomb (cave-like structure), got healed and got up and left. He was never inside any coffin nor ever got buried inside the earth.
2- He was pierced for our sins. No, he was hurt (the word is not pierced or stabbed) because of "our"
(Jews only) sins and transgressions. If you drive with your family and get hit by a drunk driver and your baby ends up getting killed, your baby didn't die for his sin. Your baby died BECAUSE of his sin and transgression. Otherwise, you would not have driven on the same road that day if you knew the future.
Also visit:
John 11:50: It is expedient, whether through hook or by crook, that we must convict Jesus
3- In his death. It is talking about his sentencing to death and not actual death. It is also symbolic, because Jesus didn't even stay for 3 hours on the cross and was never killed. Plus, Jesus begged GOD (Matthew 26:36-44) all night to save him from crucifixion and all hurt.
Also on
2 Chronicles 18:18-22, there are also
twenty other Thrones and Mansions and Messiahs. Jesus has a Throne and his
Heaven is his Mansion. Also in Revelations 4 & 5, there are 20 other Thrones and
Mansions. Jesus himself said there are
many Mansions in GOD's
Heaven. Jesus himself said only GOD Alone decides who gets to sit on his
immediate
right and left
from the disciples. The following articles will shed ample more
light on this:
Is Allah the greatest deceiver? Allah Almighty
deceives evil for the sake of Good. See ample
Noble Verses proving this. See also the
lying spirits in the OT that GOD Almighty
sends to false prophets and their followers to make them
continue to lie.
2 Chronicles 18:18-22: Jesus was commanded into a
lying spirit along with many other (spirits / angles)
multitudes of Beings on the Right and Left of GOD Almighty.
The Bibles are all
corrupt. The Glorious Quran also declares them all to be
corrupt. The Glorious Quran also confirms the Messiah,
Eesa
(not Jesus) and his virgin mother, Marium (not Mary), peace be
upon both of them.
According to Islam and also the Jewish Law,
Jews are obligated to keep the holiness of
the Sabbath by not doing any labor work in
it.
In this exchange between Jesus and
the Pharisees from the Jews, we see the two
quacks arguing
and butchering GOD's Sabbath Law:
1 At that particular
time Jesus went through the grainfields on
the Sabbath, and His disciples were hungry
and began to pick the heads of grain and eat
them.
2 But when the Pharisees saw this, they said
to Him, “Look!
Your disciples
are doing what is
unlawful on the Sabbath.”
Totally
False! GOD Almighty commanded
all Jewish land owners to not reap the
corners of their lands, and to keep the
harvest for all passing needy people to
freely eat from them at any day and any time
(Leviticus 19:9-11).
This is to help the Jews be generous and
giving to all needy and hungry, including
locals and "strangers".
So the disciples being hungry and eating
freely on Saturday never violated the do not
labor on the Sabbath Law. It has
nothing to do with labor and doing a
money-making job at all. This was not
a flipping Kosher burgers on Saturday
money-making job.
2-
Jesus' quackery:
Notice how Jesus in his following quackery
response has dismally failed to address
Leviticus 19:9-11
above. It seems that he didn't even
know that this Law even existed:
Matthew 12:11-13
11 But He
(Jesus)
said to them, “What man is there among you
who, if he has only one
sheep
and it falls
into a pit
on the Sabbath, will not take hold of it and
lift it out?
12 How much more valuable then is a man than
a sheep! So it is lawful and permissible to
do good on the Sabbath.”
13 Then He said to the man, “Reach out your
hand!” The man reached out and it was
restored, as normal and healthy as the
other.
There are
multiple contradictions with Yahweh Almighty
Himself in Jesus' response:
1- If your
wife gives birth
on Saturday, or if your village gets
attacked on Saturday, or if your house
catches fire on Saturday, or if your sheep
falls into a well on Saturday, or any other
similar emergency case,
then this work of rescue and relief and
defense would
not be equivalent to flipping Kosher burgers
on Saturday for a money-making job.
Jews had these emergency cases happen to
them countless times on many Sabbaths.
No one was ever ordered to be put to death
because of them. Jesus is clearly a
lying spirit here, because
the example that he gave was an exceptional case of
emergency, and not
a
normal day of work.
His answer to the Jews was
totally off, had nothing to do with the
topic at hand
AT ALL, and he proved himself to be
either a quack or a
lying spirit. that came to
deceive all.
Countless
Jewish women gave birth on Saturday from the
day the Law of the Sabbath was born till
today. No one was ever put to death
because of it. Jews also fought wars
during the Sabbath with disbelievers.
But a good Jewish man collecting wood on
Saturday was ordered to be put to death by
Yahweh Himself in the OT, which takes us to
the following contradiction #2.
2-
Furthermore, Jesus was also wrong on "permissible
to do good on the Sabbath", because a
pious Jewish man was put to death for simply
collecting wood on Saturday in the OT (Numbers
15:32-36).
Yahweh Himself passed the judgment on the
man. Moses, Aaron and the priests were
afraid to pass judgment on the man because
he was a righteous Jew. If he were a
blaspheming one, they would've executed him
and his blood would've been on his head.
Moses would not have gone to Yahweh Almighty
Himself to ask Him for Judgment regarding
the Jewish man.
Jesus
defined
"good"
incorrectly here, because emergency cases
and exceptions were always allowed on the
Sabbath anyway, and Jesus dismally failed to
reference the Law of
Leviticus 19:9-11
above. Jesus' false
example about a
sheep falling into the well
on Saturday was not an example of doing good
as he falsely defined it. It was
rather an exceptional emergency case, which
had nothing to do with the Sabbath Law at
all! Police stations, hospitals,
military being ready and other related
agencies are always allowed to be open and
on alert 24/7 under the Jewish Law; Sabbath
day included. Again, countless Jewish
women gave birth on Saturday from the day
the Law of the Sabbath was born till today.
No one was ever put to death because of it.
Jews also fought wars during the Sabbath
with disbelievers. By the way, Jesus never really allowed the breaking of the Sabbath; exactly like he never allowed pork meat, nor ever forbade polygamy and many other examples of Christian falsehood and quackery. It was Jesus' lying spirt , through his twisted ways of speaking, that clearly and thoroughly misled Christians by creating the false pagan and polytheistic religion of Christianity, which takes us to the following contradiction.
3-
The polytheist trinitarian pagans ate the
lying spirit's
lie whole! All of them from the birth
of his lie and till this day are all
Sabbath
breakers; a Law from the many Laws
that Jesus supposedly did not come to
abolish.
And the polytheist trinitarian pagans invented Sunday as a Christian
holiday out of further blasphemy and
ignorance. See also section#10
about "Pork and sex oxymoron."
Christianity is a lie and war on GOD
Almighty.
Matthew 12:11-13 is simply a dumb
argument between two
quacks, Jesus vs. Pharisees, arguing about
the Sabbath, and both quacks ended up proving that
they horribly misunderstood what the Sabbath
is. Both presented the stupidest
arguments against the other, and both
resulted in the Sabbath being permanently
lost among Christians, which further proves
that Christianity is a false religion that
was inspired by the
lying spirits that GOD Almighty
sends to false people in the OT. Keep
in mind also that people in the NT also
called Jesus a "fat
drunk". So either he was a
charlatan pretending to be the Messiah, or
he was a
lying spirit. In
either case, Christianity is a false
religion from Hell.
=
War on GOD
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying spirit
Jews are
commanded, and are still till this day, to
keep their Sabbath:
[004:154]
At that time We made a covenant with them.
We caused Mount ‘Toor’ to protrude and hang
over them. We said to them, “Go through the
gate (in humility, bowing down) in
prostration.” We said to them, “Do
not exceed (or side step) the
limits of the Sabbath-laws.”
We took a
sacred (inviolable) covenant
from them.
See also the ample prophecies, from the
previous Scriptures, about the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Islam's Divine Miracles:
3-
Not only that, but Israel has faced a major
wholesale slaughter by
Titus and his army
in year 70 AD.
So many had died just for being Jews. And all of the disciples
of Jesus were Jewish. And certainly many martyrdom stories
were written in Israel and abroad. Every hero had to be
martyred to further legitimize the cause. And so therefore,
many fabricated stories were invented regarding the disciples to
raise their heroism. Not only that, but all of the Bible's
accounts are highly doubtful. The Bible's own theologians
thoroughly admit this in all of the Bibles' commentaries:
So now based on what objective grounds should we reject the claim about the
Bible's New Testament's accounts being mostly false and fabricated by men?
4-
Islam's Divine Miracles:
Take care,
Osama Abdallah
According to the NIV and KJV
Bible's theologians, the gospels were written by mysterious and
unknown people, in unknown places
and unknown dates!
The disciples had spiritual conflicts with each other:
GOD's voice/sound walks in the
air. Satan's voice is the lord of the air. See
Genesis 3:8, Ephesians 2:2. So the two voices are in never-ending
struggle with each other. But it is interesting though that satan's voice
is the lord of air. It is also interesting that Paul, who never met Jesus,
claimed that Jesus spoke to him
through the air on his way to Damascus
and appeared as a bright flashing light (Acts
9:3-4). Yet, Paul himself also said:
"And no wonder, for
Satan himself
masquerades as an
angel of light."
(2 Corinthians 11:14)
. So satan is the
lord of the light too. So the proof that Jesus appeared to Paul was:
1- Jesus appeared
as a voice to Paul.
2- Jesus appeared
as a light to Paul.
3- But satan is the
LORD of voice and the ANGEL of
light.
Also, Paul has
thoroughly proven himself to be a
false prophet, so much that even several of Jesus' disciples
rejected him and he rejected them. This takes us to the point
regarding Jesus was a
lying spirit that was sent by GOD Almighty to deceive all, as GOD did
this in the OT to
others:
Isaiah 42:10-13
GOD will sing a
New Song
from Arabia via the gentile Prophet who will come from the Jews' "brothers" (Deuteronomy 18:18). Also in Jeremiah 31:31–34, it will be a new Covenant different from the one that was given to Moses. . The Ishmaelites are the brothers of the Israelites. Also, only Islam fulfilled Deuteronomy's army of 10,000 Believers (Deuteronomy 33:2). The New Testament also renews this Prophecy and claims it is yet to be fulfilled in the future. Also, Ishmael's Covenant was left for the "later generations".
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent
Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
When it came to collecting money,
the Holy Spirit was all over the place (Acts 5). But when it came to selecting
the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias via a
game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result
of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy
Spirit was supposedly there from the first place. So why
couldn't It just speak Matthias' name and be done with it?
Why the game of chance
at all? We read:
Matthew 10:20
for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
VS.
Acts 1 23 So they nominated two men: Joseph called Barsabbas (also known as
Justus) and Matthias.
24 Then they prayed, “Lord, you
know everyone’s heart. Show us which of these two you have chosen
25 to take over this apostolic ministry, which Judas left to go
where he belongs.”
26 Then they
cast lots,
and the lot fell to Matthias;
so he was added to the eleven apostles.
They rolled the dice while dismally failing
to just speak Matthias' name. And we're talking about
choosing the Prince of the
12th Divine Throne? As if that is not important enough for
the Holy Spirit?
The New
Testament's
confusing,
incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to
become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful, and for pious
believers to be considered disbelievers, and for disbelievers and
hypocrites to be considered pious believers. This in itself is
a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the
infestation of
existing false prophets and messiahs[1]
at the time.
See also
Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change
time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim about
Christianity passed the test of time, and that the calendar that we
use is based on Jesus' birth. But this exactly fulfills this
prophecy. Time has changed and the Law
has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of
problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become lawful
and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25
25 He shall speak words against the Most High,
and shall wear out the saints of the Most High,
and shall think to
change the times and the law;
and they shall be given into his hand
for a time, times, and half a time.
See also the ample prophecies about
the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Promised a lie?
1- Why couldn't the Holy Spirit say GOD Almighty Chose Matthias?
Were they not filled with the Holy Spirit:
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
Matthew 10:20
for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
Peter and Team vs. Paul and Team:
Galatians 1:6: Paul's gospel is
different from Peter and team's gospel.
Galatians 2:15-16: Why are they
arguing over following the law or not? Why are they
not in agreement of doctrine?
Galatians 2:17-21: Paul condemns all Jewish
Christians including Peter and Barnabas. Yet, Peter and
others were supposedly filled with the Holy Spirit.
2 Corinthians 11:4-5
4 For if someone comes to you and
preaches a Jesus
other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a
different spirit from the one you received, or a
different gospel
from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.
5 But I do not think I am in the least inferior to those
"super-apostles."
Romans 13:3
"Rulers are a threat to evil people only, not
to good people."Man,
just shut up!!
GOD's voice/sound walks in the air. Satan's voice is the lord of the air. See Genesis 3:8, Ephesians 2:2. So the two voices are in never-ending struggle with each other. But it is interesting though that satan's voice is the lord of air. It is also interesting that Paul, who never met Jesus, claimed that Jesus spoke to him through the air on his way to Damascus and appeared as a bright flashing light (Acts 9:3-4). Yet, Paul himself also said: "And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light." (2 Corinthians 11:14)
. So satan is the lord of the light too. So the proof that Jesus appeared to Paul was:
1- Jesus appeared as a voice to Paul. 2- Jesus appeared as a light to Paul. 3- But satan is the LORD of voice and the ANGEL of light.
Also, Paul has thoroughly proven himself to be a false prophet, so much that even several of Jesus' disciples rejected him and he rejected them. This takes us to the point regarding Jesus was a lying spirit that was sent by GOD Almighty to deceive all, as GOD did this in the OT to others:
Isaiah 42:10-13 GOD will sing a New Song from Arabia via the gentile Prophet who will come from the Jews' "brothers" (Deuteronomy 18:18). Also in Jeremiah 31:31–34, it will be a new Covenant different from the one that was given to Moses. . The Ishmaelites are the brothers of the Israelites. Also, only Islam fulfilled Deuteronomy's army of 10,000 Believers (Deuteronomy 33:2). The New Testament also renews this Prophecy and claims it is yet to be fulfilled in the future. Also, Ishmael's Covenant was left for the "later generations".
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Nobody respects me (Paul):
2 Corinthians 11:4-5
4 For if someone comes to you and
preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if
you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or a
different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up
with it easily enough.
5 But I do not think I am in the least
inferior
to those "super-apostles."
This is not about whether you're inferior or not, you
sodomized
son of satan! This is about whether or not you
and the rest of the barfoons from both sides were indeed
inspired by the Holy Spirit or not!
Again, please visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying spirit
Galatians 2:11-12
11 Furthermore, when Kefa came to Antioch,
I opposed him publicly, because
he was clearly
in the wrong.
12 For prior to the arrival of certain people from [the
community headed by] Ya‘akov, he had been eating with the
Gentile believers; but when they came, he withdrew and separated
himself, because he was afraid of the faction who favored
circumcising Gentile believers.
VS.
Mark 13:11
Whenever you are arrested and brought to
trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever
is given you at the time, for it is
not you speaking,
but the Holy Spirit.
Matthew 10:20 for it willnot be
you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father
speaking
through you.
So were they opposing the Holy Spirit in their conflicts?
There are open debates that
remained unsettled between the disciples in the NT.
Yet, they were promised that it would be the Holy Spirit that would
be speaking through their mouths, and not them. Or were they
all just a bunch of frauds that were in it for the money? That
without the money none of them would even be known?
Paul calls the Bible fables and lies:
Titus 1:10-16
10 For there are many unruly and vain
talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: 11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses,
teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. 12 One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the
Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. 13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that
they may be sound in the faith; 14 Not giving heed to
Jewish fables,
and commandments of men,
that turn from the truth. 15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are
defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and
conscience is defiled. 16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him,
being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work
reprobate.
Jewish fables and
commandments of men? The Jewish law is filled with
commandments and traditions that GOD Almighty supposedly
revealed to Moses. Among those is the law of circumcision:
Leviticus 12:3
3 And in the eighth day the flesh of his
foreskin shall be circumcised.
Exodus 12:48
And when a stranger shall sojourn with
thee, and will keep the passover to the Lord, let all his
males be circumcised,
and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one
that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised
person shall eat thereof.
Notice how Paul called
these commandments "Jewish fables, and
commandments of men". Yet, they are supposed to be
GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations to Moses. This is not
about abrogation. This is clear denial of the truthfulness
of the verses above, - that they are nothing more than
man-made lies and
fables. So
here we have the following clash:
1-
The Jewish Law contains fables and commandments of men.
2-
The Jewish law contains lies on GOD Almighty.
3-
The Jewish law is doubtful and corrupt.
4-
Jesus lied
when he said that he did not come to abolish the Jewish law, but
to fulfill it. He obviously did not come to
abolish the man-made lies
and fables:
Matthew 5:17
The Fulfillment of the Law 17 “Do not think that I have come
to
abolish the Law
or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them
but to fulfill them.
5- In Paul's
world Jesus was a liar. Also in Paul's world, the
teachings of the disciples were false and bewitchment:
Galatians 3:1-2 Faith or Works of the Law 1 You foolish Galatians!
Who has
bewitched you?
Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as
crucified. 2 I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive
the Spirit by the
works of
the law,
or by believing what you heard?
6-
There is nothing called "Bible". It is not a Divine Book
from GOD Almighty, since it is a book that is filled with lies
and corruption,
even according to itself.
Again, see also
Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change
time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim
about Christianity passed the test of time, and that the
calendar that we use is based on Jesus' birth. But this
exactly fulfills this prophecy. Time has changed and the
Law
has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of
problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become
lawful and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25
25 He shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and shall think to
change the times and the law; and they shall be given into his hand for a time, times, and half a time.
See also the ample prophecies about the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Fabricated
Bibles:
Allah Almighty Said
in the Noble Quran about the fabricated Bibles:
"Then woe
to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is
from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!-
Woe to them for what their hands do write,
and for the gain they make thereby.
(The
Noble Quran, 2:79)"
Acts 13:52 And the disciples were
filled with joy and with the
Holy
Spirit.
Acts 2:4 All of them were
filled with the
Holy Spirit and began to
speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.
Acts 4:31 After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken.
And they were all
filled with the
Holy Spirit and spoke
the word of God boldly.
2- Why did they have to roll the dice (cast
lot) to randomly select Matthias?
"Is casting
lots gambling?
Casting lots or Drawing of lots may refer to:
Cleromancy, a form of divination. Lottery,
a form of gambling
that involves the drawing of numbers for a prize. Sortition, the
practice of randomly selecting political officials from a larger
pool of candidates." (Source,
2)
3- Isn't this also a form of promoting and/or legitimizing gambling
and sorcery and future telling through rolling the dice nonsense,
since in the Bible the roll of dice was not only legitimate, but it
determined the 12th disciples to replace Judas!
4- So any delusional fool out there could pray in the Name of the
Lord and cast lots and whatever the result is is from GOD Almighty??
5- And who will sit at the Throne in the End? Matthias or Judas?
Also
visit:
Holy Spirit only for Money:
When it came to Collecting Money, the Holy Spirit was
all over the place.
You'll need to read Acts, chapters
3 thru 6.
But here is an example:
Acts 5 Ananias and Sapphira
1 Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property.
2 With his wife’s full knowledge he kept
back part of the money for himself, but brought the
rest and put it at the apostles’ feet.
3 Then Peter said, “Ananias, how is it that
Satan has so filled your heart
that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself
some of the money you received for the land?
4 Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold,
wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such
a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.”
5 When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear
seized all who heard what had happened.
6 Then some young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried
him out and buried him.
So here we have a man who sold a piece of his property and
donated some of it for the cause of GOD Almighty. What was the answer to
his charitable deed? His heart is filled with satan
because he
didn't give all of the money of the property's sale. So obviously, all of the
Christians today, world-wide without any exception, are liars whose
hearts are filled with satan, because they all have possessions
and properties that they hold on to.
The NT has unsettled open debates that their "Holy Spirit" dismally failed to settle for them, such as must the long list of 600+ Jewish Laws be upheld and followed or not? (Jeremiah 31:31–34, Isaiah 42:10-13, Deuteronomy 18:18: The Jews' Covenant will expire and will be replaced with the Gentiles' one from Arabia)> Also, conflicts rose on whether one can eat Kosher meat or not, must men get circumcised, can one eat food offered to idols, and many other issues that the disciples fought each other on.
Look at the irony here:
When it came to collecting money, the Holy Spirit was all over the
place. But when it came to selecting
the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias by a
game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result
of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy Spirit was
SUPPOSEDLY THERE from the first place! So why couldn't It just
speak Matthias' name and be done with it?? The reason this didn't
happen is:
1- Because they didn't have the Holy Spirit.
2- They couldn't agree on which candidate to choose as the
twelfth
disciple, because their heads were empty and were never filled with
the Holy Spirit.
3- GOD Almighty
would NEVER speak through rolling dice garbage, because it would
only add more suspicion and confusion. It undercuts the
credibility of the disciples.
4- The authors of the Bible have lied on Jesus and his disciples
and their history. Even the Bible's own
theologians and historians
admit that the Bible's books and gospels:
(a)- Were written by
unknown people.
(b)- In unknown places.
(c)- In unknown dates.
(d)- By unknown number of people.
"Then woe
to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is
from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!-
Woe to them for what their hands do write,
and for the gain they make thereby.
(The
Noble Quran, 2:79)"
All Thanks, Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty for
the Favor of Islam, I don't have to believe in hoaxes! The
Glorious Quran is thoroughly proven to be a Divine Miracle from
Allah Almighty. See the Glorious Quran's:
Hoaxes written?
The above clearly demonstrates that there was no Holy Spirit
inspiring the characters mentioned in the Bible's New Testament. I
am not saying all of the NT is false, but most certainly much much
of it is fabricated hoaxes. The most offensive one of them is the
fact that they had to resort to rolling the dice to choose a
disciples? And the result from the
dice roll was from GOD??
This is no less than a blasphemy and an insult on:
1- GOD Almighty.
2- The Holy Spirit.
3- All human logic and intelligence.
Why even need to roll the dice (cast
lot) when you are SUPPOSEDLY filled with the Holy
Spirit?? After all, was it a Spirit or a spit that they were filled
with? And was it GOD Almighty that made the descision or the random
chance of casting lots?
Why were the disciples
disputing on the 12th disciple if the Holy Spirit was supposedly
to the One who chose him?
Why did they have to
"cast lot"
(roll the dice) to choose him when the Holy Spirit
was supposedly standing there to choose him?
Note: They rolled the dice (casted lot)
because they were in dispute over whom to choose as the 12th
disciple:
"Is
casting lots
gambling?
Casting lots or Drawing of lots may refer to: Cleromancy, a form
of divination. Lottery, a form of gambling that involves the drawing of
numbers for a prize. Sortition, the practice of randomly
selecting political officials from a larger pool of candidates."
(Source,
2)
So why were they in
dispute if the Holy Spirit was supposedly there??
Wouldn't the dispute not
be disputing, but rather blaspheming against the Holy Spirit? But then again, the Holy Spirit wasn't
there to choose him. They lied and said It was there, and It
did choose him. It was the roll of the dice (casting the lot)
that determined the 12th disciple,
not the Holy Spirit!
Otherwise, why even roll the dice?
The disciples' martyrdom
hoax is based on legends and false writings that were written
centuries after Christ.
Titus
wholesale slaughter of Israel and Jerusalem
in
year 70 AD created all kinds of martyrdom stories.
And certainly many martyrdom stories were written in Israel and
abroad. Every hero had to be martyred to further
legitimize the cause. And so therefore, many fabricated
stories were invented regarding the disciples to raise their
heroism. Not only that, but all of the Bible's accounts
are highly doubtful. The Bible's own theologians
thoroughly admit this in all of the Bibles' commentaries.
The Bible in both the Old
and New Testaments
***** declares that
Jesus never died on the cross *****.
This is exactly what Islam also declares! This is
demonstrated below and also thoroughly demonstrated at:
All Thanks, Praise and
Glory are due to Allah Almighty for the Favor of Islam, I don't
have to believe in hoaxes! The Glorious Quran is
thoroughly proven to be a Divine Miracle from Allah Almighty.
See the Glorious Quran's:
As'salamu Alaikum everyone,
The Bible says that Jesus Christ had 12 disciples. They're all
listed in
Matthew 10
as follows:
1- Peter (also known as Simon).
2- Andrew.
3- James son of Zebedee.
4- John son of Zebedee.
5- Philip.
6- Bartholomew.
7- Thomas.
8- Matthew.
9- James son of Alphaeus.
10- Thaddaeus.
11- Simon the Zealot.
12- Judas Iscariot.
Just wondering here since we're told in the Bible's New Testament
that Judas Iscariot, one of the 12 disciples, betrayed Jesus:
Matthew 26 17 On the first day of
the Festival of Unleavened Bread, the disciples came to Jesus and
asked, “Where do you want us to make preparations for you to eat the
Passover?”
18 He replied, “Go into the city to a certain man and tell him, ‘The
Teacher says: My appointed time is near. I am going to celebrate the
Passover with my disciples at your house.’”
19 So the disciples did as Jesus had directed them and prepared the
Passover.
20 When evening came, Jesus was reclining at the table with the
Twelve.
21 And while they were eating, he said, “Truly I tell you, one of
you will betray me.”
22 They were very sad and began to say to him one after the other,
“Surely you don’t mean me, Lord?”
23 Jesus replied, “The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl
with me will betray me.
24 The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him.
But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man!
It would be better for him if he had not been born.”
25 Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, “Surely you don’t
mean me, Rabbi?”
Jesus answered, “You have said so.”
Yet, Jesus when he started his ministry with the 12 (including
Judas), he said this:
Matthew 19 23 Then Jesus said to his disciples,
“Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the
kingdom of heaven.
24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye
of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of
God.”
25 When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and
asked, “Who then can be saved?”
26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but
with God all things are possible.”
27 Peter answered him, “We have left everything to follow you! What
then will there be for us?”
28 Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all
things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who
have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes
of Israel.
29 And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father
or mother or wife[e] or children or fields for my sake will receive
a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.
30 But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will
be first.
So, will Judas sit in one of the 12 Thrones? Or will he be
condemned to Hell, since Jesus said woe to him, and it would've been
better for him if he was never born. And if Judas will be condemned
to Hell, then did Jesus lie when he promised Judas one of
the 12 Thrones?
So what do you think?
So what do you, the reader, think? Am I way off? Where am I
going wrong here?
Is Holy Gambling allowed in Christianity?
And was playing a game of chance necessary in choosing the twelfth
disciple? Doesn't this prove that there was indeed a dispute
amongst them on who should've been the 12th disciple? And
since there was NO HOLY
SPIRIT inspiring them, the only way to resolve this was
to cast lots. Don't forget that Jesus promised them that the
Holy Spirit will speak clearly to them without any confusion or
riddle:
John 16
25 I have used examples to explain to you what
I have been talking about. But the time will come when I will
speak to you plainly
about the Father and will no longer use examples like these.
So why couldn't Jesus here just
SPEAK Matthias' name
to be the 12th disciple? Why the use of
the game of chance?
Does it not render him useless and pointless
when
using it to determine who will be the winner (12th disciple)?
The point of Jesus' promise of speaking clearly and plainly and
directly without riddles or examples to his disciples was to prevent
any and all confusion. Yet, we see here a silly game of chance
determining a very important issue in Christianity! The
determination of the 12th disciple should not be done by:
1-
Voting among the disciples.
2-
Or playing a game of chance among the disciples.
This is a thing that GOD Almighty
supposedly has to decide for Himself. After all this is
disciple that WILL SIT AT
THE THRONE OF GOD ALMIGHTY TO JUDGE THE ISRAELITES.
So no game of chance should be allowed. Why use it when they
supposedly had the Holy Spirit speaking clearly and plainly and
directly to them?
Doesn't this look like a fabricated lie
on GOD Almighty to you??
It sure stinks like a rotten dead flesh to me!
The Martyrs Lie:
Were the disciples
martyred?
Some might answer the above
objections by saying that yes GOD Almighty chose the game of chance
to determine the 12th disciple, and the proof for this is the fact
that the disciples were all or most martyred in the cause of
spreading Christianity. So therefore, since they died for what
they believed in, then they certainly have died for something they
very strongly believed was the Truth. And since they all or
many of them did it, then this could not have been a fabricated lie.
Response:
1-
There is not one confirmed fact that any of the disciples was
martyred for his belief. All of these claims of martyrdoms
were written by Church fathers in the 3rd and 4th century.
That's at least 200 years
after Jesus' departure.
"Summary: The
Bible only mentions the deaths of two
apostles, James who was put to death by Herod Agrippa I in 44 AD and
Judas Iscariot who committed suicide shortly after the death of
Christ. The details of the deaths of
three of the apostles (John, the Beloved, Bartholomew and Simon the
Canaanite) are not
known at all, either by tradition or early historians.
The deaths of the other seven apostles are known by tradition or the
writings of early Christian historians. According to traditions and
the Bible, eight of the Apostles died as
Martyrs. At least two of the Apostles,
Peter and Andrew were crucified." (Source)
2-
The Bible declares that Jesus never died:
The
lying spirits from GOD that He sends to
false prophets and their people. Also the Glorious Quran's
4:156-158 ("shubbiha
lahum" (appeared to them) and Christianity's
conjecture) Noble Verses
are thoroughly covered below.
Jesus became a
lying spirit:
2 Chronicles 18:18-22: Jesus was commanded into a
lying spirit along with many other (spirits / angles)
multitudes of Beings on the
right and left of GOD Almighty. The Glorious Quran's 4:156-158 "shubbiha lahum" (appeared to them) is clearly about Allah Almighty tricked them into seeing and believing that Jesus was actually crucified when in actuality he was not. See also below
Matthew 27:16-17 about the TWO JESUSES that Pontus Pilate was standing in between them and the ample conjecture and confusion that this has created:
2 Chronicles 18:18-22
18 Micaiah continued, “Therefore hear the word of the
Lord: I saw the Lord sitting on his throne with all the multitudes of heaven standing on
his right and on his left.
19 And the Lord said, ‘Who
(Jesus included)
will entice Ahab king of Israel into attacking Ramoth
Gilead and going to his death there?’ “One suggested this, and another
that.
20 Finally, a
spirit came forward,
stood before the Lord and said, ‘I will entice him.’ “‘By what means?’ the
Lord asked.
21 “‘I will go and be a
deceiving spirit
in the mouths of all his prophets,’ he said. “‘You will succeed in enticing
him,’ said
the Lord. ‘Go and do it.’
22 “So now the Lord has put a deceiving spirit in the mouths of these prophets
of yours. The Lord has decreed disaster for you.”
1 Kings 22:23 "So now the LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouths of all these prophets of yours. The LORD has decreed disaster for you."
GOD despised the Jews:
Many verses show that the GOD of the bibles
greatly despised the Jews. He called them
liars even from their birth. He also said that their writings
of the
bibles are full of lies [2].
And He considered their lives worthless (example: GOD
Almighty killed 70,000 Jews for David's crime in
1 Chronicles 21:8-30).
So GOD sending them a grand lying spirit, Jesus, to thoroughly grow and complete
their lies, and bury them in conjecture and confusion is something suitable for
their doings.
Keep in mind also that Jesus has the spirit of "fearing GOD" in him. So he was definitely one of the created Spirits from among the "multitudes" of creations that were standing on the "right and left" Hands of GOD Almighty
in
2 Chronicles 18:18
above. See also: Jesus was created from the Word.
Jesus is also
spirit:
Romans 8:9 Anyone who
does not have the
Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.
2 Corinthians 3:17
Now the Lord is the Spirit,
and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent
Jesus
to be Christianity's lying spirit:
Confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic language, riddles and hyperboles falsely
made sinful lawful and
lawful sinful
(ex: pork became
lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of
blasphemies and quackery).
See also
Oxymoron Trinity
(100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter
100s of millions when he returns.. Jesus also spoke in
diversions and not give straight forward answers (ex: him speaking about
resurrection and marriage, which are not related, because marriage
happens in Heaven, not at resurrection), all of this and more
says that Jesus was highly problematic to his followers. Allah Almighty
summed up Christianity in one Word:
"they follow nothing but
conjecture".
This is thoroughly discussed below.
NASB Translation
all (3), better (1), deep (1), earnestly (3), enough (1), even more (1), few*
(1), freely (1), full (1), further (1), further* (3), great (33), greater (4),
greater numbers
(1), greatly (5), hard (2), harshly (1), heartily (1), high price (1), large
(30), large numbers (1), large sums (1),
larger
(1), late* (2), lengthy (1), long (5), longer (1), loudly (1),
majority
(3), many (181), many more (1), many people (1), many subjects (1), many things
(17), many...things (4), more (25), more numerous (1),
most
(8),
most people's
(1), much (50), often (1), plentiful (2), quite (2), several (1), some (1),
something greater (2), strict (1), terrible (1), very (1), very large (1), very
long (1), very much (1).
According to the Gospel of Matthew,
Pontus Pilate was standing between two double-Jesus men:
1- Jesus
Barabbas.
2- Jesus Barabbas.
Yes, both were called "Jesus Barabbas" (Matthew
27:16-17). Barabbas (/bəˈræbəs/; Aramaic:
ישועבראבא Bar ʾAbbaʾ, literally "son of the father").
The first Jesus Barabba was a Jewish revolutionist who killed Roman soldiers
to free his people. The second one is our Jesus Christ. Both had
no known biological fathers.
In the Middle East, if a person's father
is unknown, they call him "son of his/your father".
This title is also used for great warriors and great achievers. Such
heroes
would be called by the people: "You are indeed the son of your father!", since
the hero is
his father's seed.
Bastards are also called that (son of your/his father), and not "bastard",
to not immediately sound insulting to them.
It is no coincidence that Pilate was
standing between two almost "identical twins"
in names and most probably in looks too, on the same day and hour and minute.
You could not have planned it! Two strangers who
were exact in names and most possibly in looks, were to get crucified on the
same day and same hour. Not that the first one is in
February and the other in
September. No:
1. Same year.
2. Same month.
3. Same
day.
4. Same hour.
5. Same exact name.
6. Same looks.
GOD Almighty in the OT also sends lying spirits to the false prophets and their followers to help them grow their lies and misleading. See also Oxymoron Trinity (100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter100s of millions when he returns.. Christianity is a war on GOD Almighty and a polytheist trinitarian paganism. Allah Almighty summed up Christianity in one Word: "they follow nothing but conjecture". This is thoroughly discussed below.
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Clear Divine Purpose played:
There is clearly a Divine Purpose in the
event of the double-Jesus men. This was not a coincident! Ample
passages and proofs are provided in the following links:
The Romans had to
fake his crucifixion due to
Passover issues:
Click to play
video [1].
Matthew 12:40:"shall
be buried deep in the heart of earth for 3 days and nights as Jonah was deep in the belly
of the whale."
Jonah was alive: But Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive!
This Prophecy is a lie!
Jesus laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and
left. He was
never
inside any coffin
nor ever got buried. Also, because 100s
of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the
Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers
were
even denied food due to lack of time.
Jesus never got
crucified: [1]
[2]
[3]
[4].
The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was
saved.
Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty Said in the Glorious Quran:
[004:156] That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge; [004:157] That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Apostle of God";-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) know ledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- [004:158] Nay, God raised him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise;-
Divine Setup for Conjecture:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
"... but so it was made to appear to them..." (Quran 4:157)
Was Jesus Christ Crucified?
At hour 1:00:00 - 1:25:00, Dr. Zakir Naik really sealed this debate and destroyed Christianity!
This is yet another wonderful 3-hour debate and video by Dr. Zakir Naik where he thoroughly demonstrated from the Bible's New Testament that Jesus Christ was never crucified, nor did he ever rise from the dead. This 3-hour debate was between Dr. Zakir Naik and Pastor Rukni.
Psalm 91 promises Jesus will never get hurt or die. Satan in the NT challenged Jesus on Psalm 91. Yashua (salvation) is the last word in Psalm 91, and it also happens to be one of Jesus' names in the New Testament.
Here is my shortened version video. Dr. Naik also provided many more verses than the following ones. But the following verses and points were from my shortened version video. See also this text-debate [2] between me and a Christian brother on my blog. You're welcomed to join in.
Christianity's Salvation Lie:
Because Christianity's scriptures didn't get documented for 200+ years after Jesus, the Church and Christians had developed and invented the crucifixion lie and its requirement to save a person from Hell (by him believing in it), which had been thoroughly proven from both the Bible and the Glorious Quran, to be a fabricated lie [1]. Salvation verses like John 3:16 and others are all forgeries that were invented by liars 100s of years after the real Eesa, the real Messiah. Even in Latin, it is Iesu, and in Greek it is Iesus. Notice here Jesus' statements:
Matthew 9 12 Jesus heard them and answered, “Healthy people don’t need a doctor, but sick people do. 13 Go and learn what the Scriptures mean when they say, ‘Instead of offering sacrifices to me, I want you to be merciful to others.’I didn’t come to invite good people to be my followers. I came to invite sinners.”
Matthew 5:7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.
Being Merciful to others makes you a good person. And Jesus didn't come for you if you are. Jesus didn't come to invite
merciful and good people. They're already
saved. They need no invitation.
The Christian lie about one must accept that Jesus died on the cross for his/her sins is mandatory for their salvation, and that otherwise they'd be doomed to Hell is thoroughly destroyed in Matthew 9:12-13.
Matthew 9:12-13I have not come for you if you're a merciful Jew.
Three Isaiah 53 translation lies:
Three lies in translations of Isaiah 53, as further elaborated below in this table, that need to be clarified:
1- He was assigned a grave. This doesn't mean he was buried in it, because Jesus was never buried in any grave. He laid on the floor inside a tomb (cave-like structure), got healed and got up and left. He was never inside any coffin nor ever got buried inside the earth.
2- He was pierced for our sins. No, he was hurt (the word is not pierced or stabbed) because of "our"
(Jews only) sins and transgressions. If you drive with your family and get hit by a drunk driver and your baby ends up getting killed, your baby didn't die for his sin. Your baby died BECAUSE of his sin and transgression. Otherwise, you would not have driven on the same road that day if you knew the future.
Also visit:
John 11:50: It is expedient, whether through hook or by crook, that we must convict Jesus
3- In his death. It is talking about his sentencing to death and not actual death. It is also symbolic, because Jesus didn't even stay for 3 hours on the cross and was never killed. Plus, Jesus begged GOD (Matthew 26:36-44) all night to save him from crucifixion and all hurt.
Also on
2 Chronicles 18:18-22, there are also
twenty other Thrones and Mansions and Messiahs. Jesus has a Throne and his
Heaven is his Mansion. Also in Revelations 4 & 5, there are 20 other Thrones and
Mansions. Jesus himself said there are
many Mansions in GOD's
Heaven. Jesus himself said only GOD Alone decides who gets to sit on his
immediate
right and left
from the disciples. The following articles will shed ample more
light on this:
Is Allah the greatest deceiver? Allah Almighty
deceives evil for the sake of Good. See ample
Noble Verses proving this. See also the
lying spirits in the OT that GOD Almighty
sends to false prophets and their followers to make them
continue to lie.
2 Chronicles 18:18-22: Jesus was commanded into a
lying spirit along with many other (spirits / angles)
multitudes of Beings on the Right and Left of GOD Almighty.
The Bibles are all
corrupt. The Glorious Quran also declares them all to be
corrupt. The Glorious Quran also confirms the Messiah,
Eesa
(not Jesus) and his virgin mother, Marium (not Mary), peace be
upon both of them.
According to Islam and also the Jewish Law,
Jews are obligated to keep the holiness of
the Sabbath by not doing any labor work in
it.
In this exchange between Jesus and
the Pharisees from the Jews, we see the two
quacks arguing
and butchering GOD's Sabbath Law:
1 At that particular
time Jesus went through the grainfields on
the Sabbath, and His disciples were hungry
and began to pick the heads of grain and eat
them.
2 But when the Pharisees saw this, they said
to Him, “Look!
Your disciples
are doing what is
unlawful on the Sabbath.”
Totally
False! GOD Almighty commanded
all Jewish land owners to not reap the
corners of their lands, and to keep the
harvest for all passing needy people to
freely eat from them at any day and any time
(Leviticus 19:9-11).
This is to help the Jews be generous and
giving to all needy and hungry, including
locals and "strangers".
So the disciples being hungry and eating
freely on Saturday never violated the do not
labor on the Sabbath Law. It has
nothing to do with labor and doing a
money-making job at all. This was not
a flipping Kosher burgers on Saturday
money-making job.
2-
Jesus' quackery:
Notice how Jesus in his following quackery
response has dismally failed to address
Leviticus 19:9-11
above. It seems that he didn't even
know that this Law even existed:
Matthew 12:11-13
11 But He
(Jesus)
said to them, “What man is there among you
who, if he has only one
sheep
and it falls
into a pit
on the Sabbath, will not take hold of it and
lift it out?
12 How much more valuable then is a man than
a sheep! So it is lawful and permissible to
do good on the Sabbath.”
13 Then He said to the man, “Reach out your
hand!” The man reached out and it was
restored, as normal and healthy as the
other.
There are
multiple contradictions with Yahweh Almighty
Himself in Jesus' response:
1- If your
wife gives birth
on Saturday, or if your village gets
attacked on Saturday, or if your house
catches fire on Saturday, or if your sheep
falls into a well on Saturday, or any other
similar emergency case,
then this work of rescue and relief and
defense would
not be equivalent to flipping Kosher burgers
on Saturday for a money-making job.
Jews had these emergency cases happen to
them countless times on many Sabbaths.
No one was ever ordered to be put to death
because of them. Jesus is clearly a
lying spirit here, because
the example that he gave was an exceptional case of
emergency, and not
a
normal day of work.
His answer to the Jews was
totally off, had nothing to do with the
topic at hand
AT ALL, and he proved himself to be
either a quack or a
lying spirit. that came to
deceive all.
Countless
Jewish women gave birth on Saturday from the
day the Law of the Sabbath was born till
today. No one was ever put to death
because of it. Jews also fought wars
during the Sabbath with disbelievers.
But a good Jewish man collecting wood on
Saturday was ordered to be put to death by
Yahweh Himself in the OT, which takes us to
the following contradiction #2.
2-
Furthermore, Jesus was also wrong on "permissible
to do good on the Sabbath", because a
pious Jewish man was put to death for simply
collecting wood on Saturday in the OT (Numbers
15:32-36).
Yahweh Himself passed the judgment on the
man. Moses, Aaron and the priests were
afraid to pass judgment on the man because
he was a righteous Jew. If he were a
blaspheming one, they would've executed him
and his blood would've been on his head.
Moses would not have gone to Yahweh Almighty
Himself to ask Him for Judgment regarding
the Jewish man.
Jesus
defined
"good"
incorrectly here, because emergency cases
and exceptions were always allowed on the
Sabbath anyway, and Jesus dismally failed to
reference the Law of
Leviticus 19:9-11
above. Jesus' false
example about a
sheep falling into the well
on Saturday was not an example of doing good
as he falsely defined it. It was
rather an exceptional emergency case, which
had nothing to do with the Sabbath Law at
all! Police stations, hospitals,
military being ready and other related
agencies are always allowed to be open and
on alert 24/7 under the Jewish Law; Sabbath
day included. Again, countless Jewish
women gave birth on Saturday from the day
the Law of the Sabbath was born till today.
No one was ever put to death because of it.
Jews also fought wars during the Sabbath
with disbelievers. By the way, Jesus never really allowed the breaking of the Sabbath; exactly like he never allowed pork meat, nor ever forbade polygamy and many other examples of Christian falsehood and quackery. It was Jesus' lying spirt , through his twisted ways of speaking, that clearly and thoroughly misled Christians by creating the false pagan and polytheistic religion of Christianity, which takes us to the following contradiction.
3-
The polytheist trinitarian pagans ate the
lying spirit's
lie whole! All of them from the birth
of his lie and till this day are all
Sabbath
breakers; a Law from the many Laws
that Jesus supposedly did not come to
abolish.
And the polytheist trinitarian pagans invented Sunday as a Christian
holiday out of further blasphemy and
ignorance. See also section#10
about "Pork and sex oxymoron."
Christianity is a lie and war on GOD
Almighty.
Matthew 12:11-13 is simply a dumb
argument between two
quacks, Jesus vs. Pharisees, arguing about
the Sabbath, and both quacks ended up proving that
they horribly misunderstood what the Sabbath
is. Both presented the stupidest
arguments against the other, and both
resulted in the Sabbath being permanently
lost among Christians, which further proves
that Christianity is a false religion that
was inspired by the
lying spirits that GOD Almighty
sends to false people in the OT. Keep
in mind also that people in the NT also
called Jesus a "fat
drunk". So either he was a
charlatan pretending to be the Messiah, or
he was a
lying spirit. In
either case, Christianity is a false
religion from Hell.
=
War on GOD
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying spirit
Jews are
commanded, and are still till this day, to
keep their Sabbath:
[004:154]
At that time We made a covenant with them.
We caused Mount ‘Toor’ to protrude and hang
over them. We said to them, “Go through the
gate (in humility, bowing down) in
prostration.” We said to them, “Do
not exceed (or side step) the
limits of the Sabbath-laws.”
We took a
sacred (inviolable) covenant
from them.
See also the ample prophecies, from the
previous Scriptures, about the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Islam's Divine Miracles:
3-
Not only that, but Israel has faced a major
wholesale slaughter by
Titus and his army
in year 70 AD.
So many had died just for being Jews. And all of the disciples
of Jesus were Jewish. And certainly many martyrdom stories
were written in Israel and abroad. Every hero had to be
martyred to further legitimize the cause. And so therefore,
many fabricated stories were invented regarding the disciples to
raise their heroism. Not only that, but all of the Bible's
accounts are highly doubtful. The Bible's own theologians
thoroughly admit this in all of the Bibles' commentaries:
So now based on what objective grounds should we reject the claim about the
Bible's New Testament's accounts being mostly false and fabricated by men?
Paul nullified and contradicted the point of
Baptism. Him calling the disbelievers, who are supposed to
be doomed to Hell, as "sanctified" and
"holy" is
clear nonsense and stupidity, and further proves with CLEAR-CUT
proofs that his words were not Revelations from GOD Almighty.
It also contradicts
GOD Almighty's verdict about them in the
Old Testament.
Keep in mind that Paul himself admitted that he wasn't sure whether the Holy
Spirit was inspiring him or not. Please visit:
Having said that, let us now see what the Bible theologians say about Paul's
books:
"Although the introduction, which is rather lengthy,
and the conclusion, which has a longer list of greetings than usual, identify
this book as an epistle, the content as a whole does not have the
occasional character or personal touch usually found in the Pauline letters.
(The Amplified Bible, Page 1297)"
So it's quite possible and probable that the letter (book) of Romans was any
of the following:
Written by Paul and other people.
Written by people other than Paul.
Written by Paul and altered by others.
Written by unknown people altogether.
"The writer of this letter was the apostle Paul (see 1:1).
No voice from the early church was ever raised against his authorship. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1705)"
Ok, but notice how in this Book, we see the actual author himself, and in the ones
above, we see nothing but conclusions. If GOD was the actual inspirer of all of these
Books, then He wouldn't put us in the agony of making some conclusions to figure out His
Words. Is GOD the author of confusion? Paul is also clear about his ownership of the
Books of 1 Corinthians and 2 Corinthians.
But why must we take every single word that Paul spoke especially during his
conversations with others as Words of GOD Almighty?!
Is Paul GOD Himself? No Christian believes in that. Paul fought with Saint Peter
and accused him of being "clearly in the wrong" (Galatians:
2:11-12), and had a huge argument with Saint Barnabas (Acts 15:36-39).
Did GOD favor Paul over Barnabas and Peter and inspired him the words while he was
fighting with them? I don't think so!.
Paul himself admitted before that he wasn't always inspired by GOD Almighty himself (1 Corinthians 7:25-30).
And since Paul never met Jesus in person
(Acts
9:2-4.
Note: Paul's name used to be Saul. Yet, Paul
admittedly wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit
was inspirning him or not), and only claimed that Jesus came to him in
person then there is always the possibility of him being untruthful. Since Paul never
performed any miracles to help us believe his claim of Prophet hood, then his claim about
him being GOD's apostle is just as good as me for instance claiming to be GOD's apostle.
Benny Hyne, one of today's famous Christian missionaries who have millions of fans
world wide, claims and shows on TV how he could cure the paralyzed and makes him walk
again. He claims that Jesus is inside him when he performs his so-called miracles. Why
can't it be a bunch of liars that he paid and brought on TV, pretend to act paralyzed and
pretend to act healed?
Paul could just as well be another Benny Hyne, except that Benny Hyne performed
miracles (that are fake of course), but Paul never performed anything.
I hope you see how confusing the Bible really is. Its books are believed today from
conclusions only as you've seen above, and it is only to be believed by blind faith. Blind
faith is not the way to believe in GOD Almighty's Words, because GOD is not the author of
confusion.
"Scholars have noticed a lack of continuity in
this document. For example the long section of 2, 14-7, 4 seems
abruptly spliced into the narrative of a crisis and its resolution.
Identical or similar topics, moreover, seem to be treated several times during
the letter. Many judge, therefore, that this letter as it stands
incorporates several briefer letters sent to Corinth over a certain span of
time. If this is so, then Paul himself or, more likely, some other
editor clearly took care to gather those letters together and impose
some literary unity upon the collection, thus producing the document that has
come down to us as the Second Letter to the Corinthians.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4,
Page 1252)"
Again, we have no idea how many people wrote and edited the letters, and we
don't know where and when this happened.
"The early church was unanimous in its testimony that
Philippians was written by the apostle Paul (see 1:1). Internally the letter reveals
the stamp of genuineness. The many personal references of the author fit what we
know of Paul from other NT books. (From the NIV Bible
Commentary [1], page 1803)"
Again, it was assumed that this book was written by Paul himself. No one knows
for sure whether it was Paul or somebody else. The New Testament wasn't even
documented until 150-300 years after the disappearance of Jesus peace be upon him.
If we're going to assume that Books that look appealing to us as the True Word of GOD
Almighty, then we are committing a great crime against GOD Almighty and His Holy
Words. No where in this Book we see a statement saying that it was inspired by GOD
Almighty Himself.
"That Colossians is a genuine letter Paul is not usually
disputed. In the early church, all who speak on the subject of authorship ascribe it
to Paul. In the 19th century, however, some thought that the heresy refuted in ch. 2
was second-century Gnosticism. (From the NIV Bible
Commentary [1], page 1813)"
Again, it was assumed that Paul was the one who wrote the Book. But again, who's
to say that it was inspired by GOD Almighty Himself?
"Paul's authorship of 2 Thessalonians has been questioned
more often than that of 1 Thessalonians, in spite of the fact that it has more support
from early Christian writers. (From the NIV Bible
Commentary [1], page 1829)"
So basically we're not certain whether or not Paul wrote the Book. And even if
Paul was the one who wrote it, we still don't know whether it was the True Words of GOD
Almighty or not, because no where in the Book we see any indication that it was inspired
by the Almighty GOD.
Exposing the Old Testament's
historical corruptions
As we see in the introduction above in Jeremiah 8:8, the entire
Bible is doubtful and full of man-made lies that were inserted into it through the scribes
and other means of alterations. The Bible is obviously a corrupted book!
See also
600+ Commandments from GOD Almighty to Moses and the Israelites (Jeremiah 31:31–34, Isaiah 42:10-13, Deuteronomy 18:18: The Jews' Covenant will expire and will be replaced with the Gentiles' one from Arabia).
"Historically, Jews and Christians alike have held that
Moses was the author/compiler of the first five books of the OT. These books, known also
as the Pentateuch (meaning "five-volumed book"), were referred to in Jewish
tradition as the five fifths of the law (of Moses). The Bible itself suggests Mosaic
authorship of Genesis, since Ac 15:1 refers to circumcision as "the custom taught by
Moses," an allusion of Ge 17. However, a certain amount of later editorial
updating does appear to be indicated (see, e.g., notes on 14:14; 36:31; 47:11).
(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 2)"
So in reality, the book of Genesis had been tampered with by man. It had been
corrupted. It is dangerous to consider all of it as the True Living Words of GOD
Almighty, because by doing so, we are running into the risk of committing a crime against
Him since we are claiming that He spoke words that He never spoke.
"It is not necessary, however, to claim that Numbers came
from Moses' hand complete and in final form. Portions of the book were probably added by
scribes or editors from later periods of Israel's history. For example, the protestation
of the humility of Moses (12:3) would hardly be convincing if it came from his own mouth.
(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 183)"
So in reality, we don't know who were all the authors who wrote the book of Numbers.
How is it possible then to call the book of Numbers the True Living Revelations of
GOD Almighty if the book had been tampered with by the man-made laws of the scribes?
As you clearly saw in Jeremiah 8:8 in the introduction above, GOD Almighty condemned
the laws of the scribes and accused them for turning the Bible into a lie.
The book of Deuteronomy:
"The book itself testifies that, for the most part, Moses
wrote it (1:5; 31:9,22,24), and other OT books agree (1Ki 2:3, 8:53; 2ki 14:6;
18:12)--though the preamble (1:1-5) may have been written by someone else, and the report
of Moses' death (ch.34) was almost certainly written by someone else. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 240)"
As we clearly see, there is ample evidence that proves beyond the shadow of the doubt
that Moses was not the sole author of the book. He couldn't have possibly have
written about his own death. Again, another corrupted book by man in the
Bible. How can you claim that the book of Deuteronomy was indeed all revealed by GOD
Almighty? If you're not sure, and you still insist on your claim, then you are
committing a crime against GOD Almighty's Revelations.
The book of Joshua:
"It seems safe to conclude that the book, at least in its
early form, dates from the beginning of the monarchy. Some think that Samuel may have had
a hand in shaping or compiling the materials of the book, but in fact we are
unsure who the final author or editor was. (From
the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 286)"
Again, another book whom we don't know who in the world wrote it. Yet, Jews and
Christians consider this nonsense as a Revelation from GOD Almighty.
The book of Judges:
"Although, according to tradition, Samuel wrote the book, authorship
is actually uncertain."
"The date of the composition is also unknown, but it was
undoubtedly during the monarchy."
(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 322).
Another book with many doubts had been inserted into the Bible. How much more
evidence do you need to be convinced that the Bible is corrupted, or to say the least, not
a perfect book?
The book of Ruth:
"The author is unknown. Jewish tradition
points to Samuel, but it is unlikely that he is the author because the mention of David
(4:17,22) implies a later date. (From the NIV Bible
Commentary [1], page 360)"
Same as above.
The books of 1 and 2 Samuel:
"Many questions have arisen pertaining to the literary
character, authorship and date of 1,2 Samuel."
"Who the author was cannot be known with certainty
since the book itself gives no indication of his identity."
(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 368).
Again, unknown books with unknown authors had been inserted into the Bible and are now
considered GOD's Revelations. What a joke! Since when do we consider man-made
stories and narrations as GOD's Revelations?
The books of 1 and 2 Kings:
"There is little conclusive evidence as to the identity of
the author of 1,2 Kings."
"Whoever the author was, it is clear that
he was familiar with the book of Deuteronomy."
(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 459).
Again, another unknown books with unknown authors had corrupted the Bible.
The books of 1 and 2 Chronicles:
"According to ancient Jewish tradition, Ezra wrote
Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah (see Introduction to Ezra: Literary Form and Authorship), but
this cannot be established with certainty. (From
the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 569)"
Again, another doubtful nonsense had been considered to be GOD's Revelations.
The book of Esther:
"Although we do not know who wrote the book of
Esther, from internal evidence it is possible to make some inferences about the
author and the date of composition. (From the NIV Bible
Commentary [1], page 707)"
Same as above.
The book of Job:
"Although most of the book consists of the words of Job and
his counselors, Job himself was not the author."
"The unknown author probably had access to
oral and/or written sources...."
(From the NIV Bible commentary [1], page 722).
Ironically, the book is named as "The book of Job", but yet, Job was not the
author, and no one in this world knows who wrote the book. Today, it is considered
GOD's Revelations.
It's quite pathetic to consider unknown people as GOD's Messengers and attribute their
work to GOD's real Messengers.
It's obvious that like most of the Bible's book and gospels, the Book of Job had been
lost.
The books of Psalm:
"Regarding authorship, opinions are even more
divided. The notations themselves are
ambiguous since the Hebrew
phraseology used, meaning in general "belonging to", an also be taken in the
sense of "concerning" or "for the use of" or "dedicated to".
The name may refer to the title of a collection of Psalms that had been gathered
under a certain name. (From the NIV Bible Commentary
[1],
page 773)"
"The Psalms consist of one hundred fifty poems of
Israel written at different times by different authors, though mainly by David,
around 1000 B.C.
..........
Because of the vast range of human feelings expressed in the Psalms, this book remains one
of the best loved and most used books of the Bible. (From
the King James Version Bible Commentary [1], page 801)"
As we clearly see above from the NIV and KJV Bibles' commentaries, this book can not be
considered as the True Words of GOD Almighty, because it was written by many unknown
authors! There is no proof that these authors were True Messengers of GOD Almighty.
Another corruption and man-made alterations had invaded the Bible and corrupted it.
This corrupted book claims that the Earth is flat and never
moves:
"He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved.
(From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"
Since when the Earth is flat and can never move?! We all know that the Earth and
the other planets rotate and move in space around the Sun.
For those Jews and Christians who would like to see where in the Noble Quran does Allah
Almighty say that the planets in space rotate and move, read the following Noble Verse:
"It is He who created the night and the day, and the sun and
the moon, all (the celestial bodies) swim along, each in its orbit with its own motion.
(The Noble Quran, 21:33)"
For more information and other Noble Verses, please visit:
"Although the book begins with a title ascribing the
proverbs to Solomon, it is clear from later chapters that he was not the only
author of the book. (From the NIV Bible
Commentary [1], page 935)"
Can anyone please tell me who that other author was? And did GOD Almighty speak
those words through his tongue?
These are fair questions, aren't they?
The book of Ecclesiastes:
"No time period or writer's name is mentioned in the
book, but several passages strongly suggest that King Solomon is the authors. On
the other hand, the writer's title, his unique style of Hebrew and his attitude toward
rulers may point to another person and a later period. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 988)"
Was it or was it not Solomon who wrote this book? If you say it was Solomon, then
how can you prove it?
And by the way, was this book a revelation to Solomon, or just Solomon's own personal
writings, if it were Solomon's book from the first place?
This corrupted book claims that the Sun hurries back to where it
rises:
"The sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where
it rises. (From the NIV Bible, Ecclesiastes 1:5)"
Since when the Sun hurries back to where it rises, like if there is some hole it rises
from and another hole it sets through on Earth?!
For those Jews and Christians who would like to see where in the Noble Quran does Allah
Almighty say that the planets in space rotate and move, read the following Noble Verse:
"It is He who created the night and the day, and the sun and
the moon, all (the celestial bodies) swim along, each in its orbit with its own motion.
(The Noble Quran, 21:33)"
For more information and other Noble Verses, please visit:
This book does not even exist in the NIV Bible! It however exists in the Roman
Catholics "The New Jerusalem Bible" [3]. This book consists of 51 chapters
that apparently the NIV Bible Historians and Theologians don't believe that they are the
True Words of GOD Almighty.
Talk about major and serious differences and corruptions in the Bibles today.
Let us look at this verse from this book: "....and the birth
of ANY daughter is a loss. (From the New Jerusalem
Bible, Ecclesiasticus 22:3)" Since when
does GOD give stupid generalizing statements for ALL the members of a certain group of His
creation?
The Book of Wisdom:
Again, this book does not even exist in the NIV Bible! It however exists in the
Roman Catholics "The New Jerusalem Bible" [3]. This book consists of 19
chapters that apparently the NIV Bible Historians and Theologians don't believe that they
are the True Words of GOD Almighty.
Again, talk about major and serious differences and corruptions in the Bibles today.
The book of Song of Songs:
"Verse 1 appears to ascribe authorship to Solomon. Solomon
is referred to seven times, and several verses speak of the 'king', but whether he
was the author remains an open question. (From
the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 997)"
"Two lovers, Solomon and a Shulamite girl, express their
feelings for one another, with occasional comments made by friends. (From the King James Version Commentary [2], page 945)"
Again, we don't know who wrote the book. Please visit X-Rated Pornography in the Bible regarding
this pornful and sick book; the book of:
1- She wished if her lover was her brother nursed at her "mother's breasts"
so she wouldn't have to take him home in secret.
2- Her breasts and vagina taste like wine for him.
The KJV Bible's Theologians and Historians say that the porn-full book talks about
Solomon and his lover. But we don't know whether it was Solomon who wrote this book
or not, nor do we know whether this is some ridiculous poem and a lie written after he
died or not.
One must ask a simple question here: Why should there be "lovers" in
the Bible? Why should there be illegal sex and disgusting pornography in the Bible?
The book of Lamentations:
"Although Lamentations is anonymous and we cannot be
certain who wrote it, ancient Jewish and Christian tradition ascribes it to
Jeremiah. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1207)"
What a joke! Christians and Jews point the book to Jeremiah
without any certainty to who wrote the book. How is it possible for us to consider
this book as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty?
Christians and Jews have yet to find and prove the original
author of the book and all of the books mentioned above, and then prove that they were
indeed Revelations from GOD Almighty.
Failure to accomplish the two tasks and inserting this type of
nonsense into the Bible and claiming that it was the Words of GOD Almighty is A CRIME
AGAINST GOD!
Embrace Islam, the religion of The One True Living Undivided GOD
Almighty, and you will be saved! Please visit What
is the Wisdom of Islam?
2-
So who wrote the Bible then? Were they really the original Prophets and
Disciples?
So, who then are the authors of the books of the Bible? Obviously the Church must know
them very well since they are popularly believed to have received divine inspiration from
God Himself. Right? Actually, they don't. For example, we will note that every Gospel
begins with the introduction "According to....." such as "The Gospel
according to Saint Matthew," "The Gospel according to Saint Luke,"
"The Gospel according to Saint Mark," "The Gospel according to Saint
John." The obvious conclusion for the average man on the street is that these people
are known to be the authors of the books attributed to them. This, however is not the
case. Why? Because not one of the vaunted four thousand copies existent carries its
author's signature. It has just been assumed that certain people were the authors. Recent
discoveries, however, refute this belief. Even the internal evidence suggests that, for
instance, Matthew did not write the Gospel attributed to him:
"...And as Jesus passed forth thence, HE (Jesus) saw a man,
named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and HE (Jesus) saith unto HIM (Matthew),
follow ME (Jesus) and HE (Matthew) arose, and followed HIM (Jesus). (Matthew 9:9)"
Did "Matthew" write this about himself? Why then didn't Matthew write for
example: "he (Jesus) saw ME, and my name is Matthew. I was sitting at the receipt of
custom…" etc.
Such evidence can be found in many places throughout the New Testament. Granted, it may
be possible that an author sometimes may write in the third person, still, in light of the
rest of the evidence that we shall see throughout this book, there is simply too much
evidence against this hypothesis.
This observation is by no means limited to the New Testament. There is even similar
evidence that at least parts of Deuteronomy were not written by their claimed author,
prophet Moses . This can be seen in Deuteronomy 34:5-10 where we read
"So Moses....DIED... and he (God Almighty) BURIED HIM
(Moses)... He was 120 years old WHEN HE DIED... and there arose not a prophet SINCE in
Israel like unto Moses....(Deuteronomy 34:5-10)"
Did Moses write his own obituary? Similarly, Joshua too speaks in detail about his own
death in Joshua 24:29-33.
"And it came to pass after these things, that Joshua the son
of Nun, the servant of the Lord, DIED, … And they BURIED HIM … And Israel served
the Lord all the days of Joshua, and all the days of the elders that over lived Joshua,
and which had known all the works of the Lord, that he had done for Israel ….(Joshua 24:29-33)"
Such evidence is part of the large cache which has driven the Biblical scholars to come
to the current recognition that most of the books of the Bible were not written by their
supposed authors. For example, the authors of the Revised Standard Version of the Bible by
Collins honestly say that the author of "Kings" is "Unknown." But if
the author is unknown then why attribute it to God? How can it then be claimed to have
been "inspired"? Continuing, we read that the book of Isaiah is "Mainly
credited to Isaiah. Parts may have been written by others." Ecclesiastics:
"Author. Doubtful, but commonly assigned to Solomon." Ruth: "Author. Not
definitely known, perhaps Samuel." and on and on.
Let us have a slightly more detailed look at only one book of the New Testament, that
of 'Hebrews':
"The author of the Book of Hebrews is unknown. Martin Luther suggested that
Apollos was the author...Tertullian said that Hebrews was a letter of Barnabas...Adolf
Harnack and J. Rendel Harris speculated that it was written by Priscilla (or Prisca).
William Ramsey suggested that it was done by Philip. However, the traditional position is
that the Apostle Paul wrote Hebrews...Eusebius believed that Paul wrote it, but Origen was
not positive of Pauline authorship."
From the introduction to the King James Bible, New revised and updated sixth edition,
the Hebrew/Greek Key Study, Red Letter Edition
and one book of the Old Testament:
"In tradition, [David] is credited with writing 73 of the Psalms; most scholars,
however, consider this claim questionable."
Encarta Encyclopedia, under "David"
Is this how we define "inspired by God"?
I asked a reverend of the local church in my neighborhood, on what gospel most often
quoted and used, he quickly answered, the Gospel of St. John!
Let us examine the Contextual Problems of the Gospel of John - Highly Recommended!
Even though this is a Darwinist site, but it has some very good and important historical
facts about the Bible's corruption. What makes it interesting is that many of their
articles were written by former Christian missionaries.
Codex Vaticanus Graece:
"Fool and
knave, can't you leave
the old reading alone and not alter
it?"
[1]
SOURCE:
Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03, A critical note. Dr. Wieland Willker,
University of Bremen. Retrieved on 2008-02-12.
https://orthodoxwiki.org/Codex_Vaticanus
Click to enlarge:
This is a note that exists in one
of the Bible's paparys! It's a note of demanding to not alter the text
after apparently having terrible experiences with this problem
[1].
3-
The New Testament was written in the 4th century by Constantine and his council by
their own words:
As we clearly see above, the books and gospels of the bible were written by mysterious
authors. The New Testament of today was written in the third century by Constantine
and his council. That is why you read things such as:
"...And as Jesus passed forth thence, HE (Jesus)
saw a
man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and HE (Jesus) saith unto
HIM (Matthew), follow ME (Jesus) and HE (Matthew) arose, and followed HIM (Jesus). (Matthew 9:9)"
"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent
priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? (From
the King James Version Bible, John 1:19)"
"John answered them, saying, I baptize with water:
but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; (From
the King James Version Bible, John 1:26)"
"For John was not yet cast into prison. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:24)"
etc.....
Also in the first 4 centuries, Christians mostly and widely believed that Jesus never
got crucified. See the proof at:
The point from this is that when you read "Jesus is the Son of
God", please keep in mind that it is quoted from a corrupted book. The
Old Testament makes numerous references about "son
of God" to many people. As I proved at: www.answering-christianity.com/son_translation.htm,
the word "son of God" literally means "SERVANT OF GOD"
in the original Hebrew.
Which Book is the people of the Book's according to the Quran?
Does the Quran say
conclusively the bible was
corrupted?
Also visit:
Is there anything legitimate
called "Bible" to begin with?
There is no Divine book called
"Bible". It's a man-made
lie. The Bible is no more than a
book that contains collections
of writings of people that were
not the original Prophets and
Disciples. Even the
Christian theologians declare
this:
I've heard that Quran 2:79 is
not really referring to the
Jews, but the "ummi", the
gentiles who write books,
because the verse right before
2:78 is talking about people who
don't know the book, writing the
book.
Also the others say that the
Quranic mensions of "distort the
scripture" is "by their tongue".
So they are not describing the
written text being distorted,
but the way they speak, they
distort it.
If someone can show me that the
context of this verse is
referring to the Jews corrupting
the scripture, that would be
very helpful! :)
If there is any new thing you
could add, it would be helpful
to me for native Arabic speakers
like Osama to help prove that
the Quran conclusively says the
older scriptures were corrupted.
Answer:
[002:078]
And there are among them
illiterates, who know not the
Book, but (see therein their
own) desires, and
they do nothing but
conjecture.
[002:079]
Then woe to those who write the
Book with their own hands, and
then say:"This is from God," to
traffic with it for miserable
price!-
Woe to them for what their
hands do write,
and for the gain they make
thereby.
Again, these Noble Verses
confirm that there is nothing
called "Bible". It is a book of
conjecture, false desires and
lies. Indeed, woe to them
for what their hands do write.
Which Book is their book?
Notice how Allah Almighty mentions
His Divine Book, and also
mentions their corrupt book
that they fabricate in
Noble
Verses 2:78-79, above.
Two books mentioned. Their
Divine Book is the Laws that
call for the Oneness of GOD
Almighty, and the Laws that
Allah Almighty called
"burdens and shackles"
(7:157)
upon the Jews that Islam came to
free them from:
Like all previous Divine Books
that Allah Almighty willed for
them to be lost forever (ex:
books of Ishmael, Noah and
others), the people of the
Book's "book" is no different.
It's original text too got lost
forever. However, the
Divine Commandments still live.
Again, those are the BURDENS AND
SHACKLES that Islam came to free
them from. What the Jews
and Christians have is
crookedness
of false desires and conjecture.
This is why Allah Almighty said
this about the Glorious Quran:
[018:001]
Praise be to God, Who hath sent
to His Servant the Book, and
hath allowed therein no
Crookedness:
[039:028]
(It is) a Quran in Arabic, without any
crookedness
(therein): in order that they
may guard against Evil.
So the Ultimate Book of the
people of the Book is the
Glorious Quran. Not the
pile of dung of praising
boyfriend-girlfriend fornication
in an
incestuous-like description
that is called "the Bible":
If Gospel was corrupted then why
Allah
ordered to judge by
corrupted book?
It was God's
orders at time of Prophet Jesus.
Now, things changed.
Quran: The
Ultimate Reference.
Just read in
context.
Noble Verses
5:46-49 above in text:
46. And We
sent,
following in their footsteps, Jesus,
the son of Mary, confirming that
which came before him in the
Torah; and
We gave him the Gospel, in which
were guidance and light and
confirming that which preceded
it of the Torah as guidance and
instruction for the righteous.
47. And
let the People of the Gospel
judge by what Allah has revealed
therein.
And whoever does not judge by
what Allah has revealed - then
it is those who are defiantly
disobedient.
48. And
We have sent down to you (O
Muhammad) the
Book (this
Qur'an) in
truth, confirming the Scripture
that came before it as
a criterion over it.
So judge between them by what
Allah has revealed, and follow
not their vain desires,
diverging away from the Truth
that has come to you. To
each among you, We have
prescribed a law and a clear
way. If Allah willed, He would
have made you one nation, but
that (He) may test you in what
He has given you; so strive as
in a race in good deeds. The
return of you (all) is to Allah;
then He will inform you about
that in which you used to
differ.
49. And
so judge (You O Muhammad)
between them by what Allah has
revealed and follow not their
vain desires,
but beware
of them lest they turn you (O
Muhammad) far away from some of
that which Allah has send down
to you.
And if they turn away, then know
that Allah's Will is to punish
them for some sins of theirs.
And truly, most of men are
Fasiqun (rebellious and
disobedient to Allah).Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
4-
The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered":
From brother Amir
AbdulRahim; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:
The subject of Mankind's Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have
taken a closer look at this subject. Its seems it's not only your site that brings this
subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.
For example, an article in the Catholic Encyclopaedia that you mentioned in regard to
the 'Theophilus' mentioned in Luke's Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of
The Bible? article) testifies to this fact (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm):
"IV. TRANSMISSION OF THE TEXT
No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left
the hands of its author--
all have been in some way altered. The
material conditions under which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440),
the little care of the copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different
from the desire of accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find
between various manuscripts of the same work. To these causes may be added, in regard to
the Scriptures, exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies. To exempt the sacred
writings from ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and
it has not been the will of God to exercise this providence."
Lets just go through that again -
"No book of
ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--all have
been in some way altered."
All have been in some way
altered! In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any muslim, to
follow an impure book?
When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur'an,
there's no contest!
Further from brother Vipor Poison; may Allah Almighty always
be pleased with him:
Luke 1:3
Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it
seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus,
If Theophilus existed in either the 2nd or the 4th centuries then how could the writer
of this gospel be the same Luke who is supposed to be with Jesus in the 1st century.
Did he live for 200 years?
Codex Vaticanus Graece:
"Fool and
knave, can't you leave
the old reading alone and not alter
it?"
[1]
SOURCE:
Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03, A critical note. Dr. Wieland Willker,
University of Bremen. Retrieved on 2008-02-12.
https://orthodoxwiki.org/Codex_Vaticanus
Click to enlarge:
This is a note that exists in one
of the Bible's paparys! It's a note of demanding to not alter the text
after apparently having terrible experiences with this problem
[1].
5- Contradictions in historical claims and accounts:
2 Kings 24:8
- Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he began to reign. 2 Chronicles 36:9
- Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he began to reign.
1 Kings 16:6-8 - 26th year of the reign of Asa,
Baasha reigned over Israel.
2 Chronicles 16:1 -
36th year of the reign of Asa, Baasha reigned over Israel.
How old was Ahaziah when he began to reign?
22 in
2 Kings 8:26
42 in
=
War on GOD
