What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube | 
When was the New Testament written??
How big was the first New Testament?
Hardly a total of 2 pages, and it was written 100 to 200 years after Jesus. Not early enough by any stretch.
What about NT manuscripts immediately after Jesus?
Zero were ever found. They were never found because none of the writings that were ever made have survived. Also, Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:
The early believers were
also expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah: Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached! 
|
Roman massacres: It is also important to know that the following seven Roman Emperors have thoroughly burned all (burnt all) of the early believers' writings:
1. Nero
(54-68) Read all the details with references here. Also visit: How big was the first New Testament?What we have today from "gospels" and "New Testament" were written 100 years to 300 years after Jesus' departure from this earth. So, the current writings that we have are not original writings. Also, to appease the Roman Empire's 3-headed pagan religion and practices, the pagan 3-headed trinity was invented [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Many lies had been fabricated after the original writings were all lost. The Jews and Christians of Arabia, however, did have writings that predicted the coming of Prophet Muhammad. These were some of the original texts that survived. The early believers were expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:
Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!
Prophet "AHMAD" is found in the
Dead Sea Scrolls:
(Clip also in this article) Prophet Muhammad in the previous Scriptures. Prophet Muhammad was thoroughly foretold in the Bible, and his prophetic Name, "Ahmed", was also found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and it was mentioned precisely in the Glorious Quran for the Prophet to be foretold by this very Name, Ahmed [1] [2]. |
Only centuries-late small 11 fragments of Papayris were found and at a much latter date, which collectively were less than 2 pages altogether. A papayri (papyrus) is a scroll, which is equivalent to a letter-size page. The 11 fragments found were dated between years 100 to 300. So even those are not even original, but are copies of copies of copies of copies and documentations of oral church teachings and fabrications. At any rate, the 11 fragments of papayris found are. They're hardly worth showing or be given a URL-link. They hardly fill 2 pages when put together:
Papayri P52
Papayri P90
Papayri P104 (only 6.35 cm by 9.5cm in size)
Papayri P98
Papayri P137
"The earliest extant fragment of the New Testament is the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, a piece of the Gospel of John dated to the first half of the 2nd century." (Dating the Bible - Wikipedia)
"The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear around 200, and the earliest complete copy of the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus dates to the 4th century." (Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia and Google Search)
Six other small fragments found were dated to the 2nd or 3rd centuries. Not even worthy of being URL-linked:
Papayri P32
Papayri P46
Papayri P66
Papayri P77
Papayri P103
Majuscule GA0189
The so-called "5800 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, with an astounding 2.6 million pages of biblical text" were all writings from 5th to the 19th century in so many languages. Like all other false religions' writings, these are irrelevant writings of church fathers and people that are similar to articles Christians write today on blogs and websites. They are totally irrelevant to the question at hand and have nothing to do with the earliest manuscripts that don't seem to to have ever existed, from the first place, during the time of Jesus and early believers.
|
From
www.answering-christianity.com/which_book_recited.htm:
1- The bibles say the bibles are full of lies: According to Islam, there is no book called "Bible". It is a man-made lie. See the sections below for ample proofs. But let us look at what the bible itself says about itself: Jeremiah 8:8
(NRSV) Jeremiah 8:8 False pen or lying pen is the false writings of the writers and copiers of the bibles' history, stories, and accounts, apocryphas and talmuds, i.e., scribes.
Isaiah
48:8
Examples: Examples of where the bibles' stories are full of lies: Bible says that Jews from their essence were liars. From their "birth" they were liars writing lies the Old Testament declares them. The Bible is full of man-made corruption and fabrications especially in the Jews' ancient history and stories. Their writings were written with the "lying pens of the scribes".
The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! Jubilees 1:12: The Jews will "abrogate and change everything". Isaiah 48:8, Psalm 58:3, Psalm 25:3 and Jeremiah 8:8: The Jews from their birth are traitors and write lies. Bible & Quran declare: Ishmael's Covenant is for the later generations [2] [3]. David was anointed via deception 1 Samuel 16:1-5. Bibles and Talmud are marred with lies. The early believers were also expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:
Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!
Also visit: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic!
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures: Let us examine the following: Romans 3:23 ESV No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
How??? How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. There is also conflict regarding misogyny: Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny. Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans. Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team. Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit. (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
.
Quran: Bibles are mostly corrupt. Noble Verses 5:44-49 are thoroughly unpacked in this article. According to the Glorious Quran, there is nothing called new testament, or bible or even old testament. There is the Thikr of Moses, which contains the Wasaya (Commandments, which are the 600+ Law Commandments), which the Prophets before Prophet Muhammad and Islam "the prophets did judge by it" (5:44). Even in the bibles we find in Deuteronomy 4:2 and other places say that the Commandments (600+) must not be mixed with any other text. Also, the Injeel or Injil is not the NT. It is the direct commands of Prophet Eesa
Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:
The early believers were also expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:
Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!
|
Disciples' spiritual
conflicts with each other:
The disciples had conflicts with each other.
- Paul called the disciples' teachings
"anathema" (cursed by GOD).- Paul called the disciples' teachings bewitchment by satan.
- Paul despised Peter and other disciples.
- Where is the Holy Spirit
again???
Insufficient Jesus:
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Paul's contradictions and corruptions.
3- The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered" with ample quotations: (Source). Therefore, trinity and all its faulty analysis are utter nonsense:
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Quran declares all Bibles are corrupt.
Oxymoron Trinity
(100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter
100s of millions when he returns. The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic!
- Where is Jesus' promise??
- They ended up splitting into Paul vs. Peter two opposing groups, and were at odds with each other on several theological issues.
- Their differences remain unsettled till this day in the NT. They were never resolved.
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures:
Let us examine the following:
Romans 3:23 ESV
For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
Ecclesiastes 7:20 ESV
Surely there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and never sins.
No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
"The spiritual man makes judgments about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man's judgment."
How???
How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. There is also conflict regarding misogyny:
Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny.
Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Insufficient Jesus:
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans.
Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team.
Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit.
Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny.
(Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity)
Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
.
Sam Shamoun declares that the
bibles and trinity
are man-made and are not from the living Word
of GOD Almighty.
Sam Shamoun: If Catholicism is false, then the entire NT is a fraud, and there is "no Christianity". It would be like the "pagan worship of Baal". Sam Shamoun also declares the 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries, and declares that if you study the bible logically, then you will become an atheist.
Click to play
video clip.
Quran: Bibles are mostly corrupt.
Noble Verses 5:44-49 are thoroughly unpacked in this article. According to the Glorious Quran, there is nothing called new testament, or bible or even old testament. There is the Thikr of Moses, which contains the Wasaya (Commandments, which are the 600+ Law Commandments), which the Prophets before Prophet Muhammad and Islam "the prophets did judge by it" (5:44). Even in the bibles we find in Deuteronomy 4:2 and other places say that the Commandments (600+) must not be mixed with any other text. Also, the Injeel or Injil is not the NT. It is the direct commands of Prophet Eesa 
(not Jesus), in which he mostly gave beautiful Commandments of Mercy, Compassion, Love, Fasting, Praying and Worshiping GOD Almighty Alone and associating no partners with Him, and also gave glad tidings about the coming of Prophet Muhammad and the new Covenant of Allah Almighty. The Bibles are all corrupt. The Glorious Quran also declares them all to be corrupt. The Glorious Quran also confirms the Messiah, Eesa (not Jesus) and his virgin mother, Marium (not Mary), peace be upon both of them and upon all of the Prophets and Messengers of Allah Almighty. We also read in Noble Verses 5:46-49:
Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:
The early believers were also expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:
Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!
Just who were the real authors of
the Bibles?
The sections of this article are:
1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels'
corruptions.
2- So who wrote the Bible then? Were they really the original Prophets and
Disciples?
3- The New Testament was written in the 4th century by Constantine and
his council by their own words.
4- The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered" [4].
5- Contradictions in historical claims and
accounts.
6- Conclusion.
7- Further Sites to Research.
8- Book Information (Bibliography).
1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions:
Below, we'll also see that the New Testamanet's gospels and books were written around between 80 to 300 years after the departure of Jesus.
|
Unknown dates
and authors? Keep in mind also that shortly after Jesus, 10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged. Below, you'll see that the Bible's books and gospels were:
Also keep in mind that the Bibles' words are marred with lies: |
The Gospel of John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"Many scholars of the past two centuries have denied that John wrote this book, partly because of their belief that the author fabricated many details such as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus. (The Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN: 978-1-58640-275-4, Gospel of John, Page1540)"
"Critical Analysis makes it difficult to accept the idea that the gospel as it now stands was written by one person. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"Within the gospel itself there are also some inconsistencies. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"To solve these problems, scholars have proposed various rearrangements that would produce a smoother order. However, most have come to the conclusion that the inconsistencies were probably produced by subsequent editing in which homogeneous materials were added to a shorter original. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"Other difficulties for any theory of eyewitness authorship of the gospel in its present form are presented by its highly developed theology and by certain elements of its literary style. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"The gospel contains many details about Jesus not found in the synoptic gospels. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"The final editing of the gospel and arrangement in its present form probably dates from between A.D. 90 and 100. Traditionally, Ephesus has been favored as the place of composition, though many support a location in Syria, perhaps the city of Antioch, while some have suggested other places, including Alexandria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
| 1 John and Galatians
forgeries:
From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm: 3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter: John 21:24-25
"We know that his testimony is true"?! Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person? Below in this article, we see:
The Gospel of 1 John: Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel: "....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)" "The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
1 John forgeries: 1 John forgeries by church fathers: The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=3480.msg16733#msg16733: By Mustafa Ahmad It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by Christians against Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") fail! But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8) Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2:22)
1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 3rd century P46 . We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct evidence that Paul wrote it. 2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is the antichrist. This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 4th century GA 01, א - Codex Sinaiticus. We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct evidence that John wrote it. How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") don’t even go back to the "alleged authors". |
So again, no one knows regarding the "Gospel of John":
Also, when one reads this gospel, he would immediately notice that it was not written by John himself. Christians say that it was John the Apostle writting about John the Baptist. The evidence in the quotes above clearly proves that this is a desperate lie! I submit to you that neither John wrote anything! Let us look at the following verses from the gospel:
"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:19)"
"John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:26)"
"For John was not yet cast into prison. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:24)"
etc...
Whoever wrote the gospel, was he appointed or inspired by GOD Almighty? If yes, then who is that man? It can't be John for it is quite obvious from the above verses and many more throughout the gospel that John wasn't the original author. One has to be ridiculously biased and blind in faith to deny that.
So now, what about these most popular verses:
"In the beginning was the Word, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was was God
was with authority
(the same Greek word used for
satan's rule [2]
[3]).
(From the King James Version Bible, John 1:1)"
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:16)"
These verses were obviously written by mysterious men and not by any of Jesus' original disciples. Therefore, it is blasphemy to consider such verses as Divine and to try to prove Jesus is the Creator of the Universe through them. The lie of trinity was born between the years of 150 to 300. It is quite possible and highly probable that some church wrote the so-called "Gospel of John" from excerpts that they found. Notice that there are 24,000 "letters" or papers found that were not included in today's New Testament, which means that the excerpts that were used for writing the "Gospel of John" and all of the other books and gospels of the NT are highly doubtful and contain no proof what so ever that they were written by any of Jesus' original disciples. The Gospel of John was written about John but not by the original "Saint John". Big difference and big corruption! You can't consider such rubbish as GOD Almighty's Divine Holy Words.
Again, please visit: The Gospel of John, Gospel or gossip? to see proof about early Christians rejecting the so-called Gospel of John. They believed it was all man-made.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
|
From
https://www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_problematic_hyperboles.htm: .......... Infestation: Again, the New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful. This in itself is a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the infestation of existing false prophets and messiahs [1] at the time. The analysis below clearly show that the false "Jesus" of the full-of-fabrications, the corrupt Bible, is not what Isa (eesa), the true Messiah and the son of our virgin mother Mary, is. Peace and blessings be upon Isa and his mother. We believe in the virgin birth of the Messiah, and we believe he will return to fight the armies of satan. Both the Bible and Islam agree that he will return as an Arab [2] from Damascus, Syria.
Baptist called Jesus a liar! The infestation gets even more ridiculous when we read from the NT that John the Baptist, the supposed great Prophet, called Jesus a liar before he died: Yes, John the Baptist died disbelieving in Jesus. |
The Gospel of Matthew:
"The unknown author, whom we shall continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience, drew no only up the Gospel according to Mark but upon a large body of material (principally, sayings of Jesus) not found in Mk that corresponds, sometimes exactly, to material found also in the Gospel according to Luke. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1008)"
"As for the place where the gospel was composed, a plausible suggestion is that it was Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1009)"
So we clearly see, both the author or authors and the place of composition of the "Gospel of Matthew" are unknown.
Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent
Jesus
to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Oxymoron Trinity
(100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter
100s of millions when he returns. The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic!
- Where is Jesus' promise??
- They ended up splitting into Paul vs. Peter two opposing groups, and were at odds with each other on several theological issues.
- Their differences remain unsettled till this day in the NT. They were never resolved.
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures:
Let us examine the following:
Romans 3:23 ESV
For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
Ecclesiastes 7:20 ESV
Surely there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and never sins.
No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
"The spiritual man makes judgments about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man's judgment."
How???
How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. There is also conflict regarding misogyny:
Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny.
Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Insufficient Jesus:
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans.
Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team.
Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit.
Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny.
(Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity)
Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
.
Sam Shamoun declares that the
bibles and trinity
are man-made and are not from the living Word
of GOD Almighty.
Sam Shamoun: If Catholicism is false, then the entire NT is a fraud, and there is "no Christianity". It would be like the "pagan worship of Baal". Sam Shamoun also declares the 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries, and declares that if you study the bible logically, then you will become an atheist.
Click to play
video clip.
Quran: Bibles are mostly corrupt.
Noble Verses 5:44-49 are thoroughly unpacked in this article. According to the Glorious Quran, there is nothing called new testament, or bible or even old testament. There is the Thikr of Moses, which contains the Wasaya (Commandments, which are the 600+ Law Commandments), which the Prophets before Prophet Muhammad and Islam "the prophets did judge by it" (5:44). Even in the bibles we find in Deuteronomy 4:2 and other places say that the Commandments (600+) must not be mixed with any other text. Also, the Injeel or Injil is not the NT. It is the direct commands of Prophet Eesa (not Jesus), in which he mostly gave beautiful Commandments of Mercy, Compassion, Love, Fasting, Praying and Worshiping GOD Almighty Alone and associating no partners with Him, and also gave glad tidings about the coming of Prophet Muhammad and the new Covenant of Allah Almighty. The Bibles are all corrupt. The Glorious Quran also declares them all to be corrupt. The Glorious Quran also confirms the Messiah, Eesa (not Jesus) and his virgin mother, Marium (not Mary), peace be upon both of them and upon all of the Prophets and Messengers of Allah Almighty. We also read in Noble Verses 5:46-49:
Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:
The early believers were also expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:
Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!
From www.answering-christianity.com/god_kingdom.htm:
Simply put: Matthew 28:19 "Therefore, go, teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit" had no existence on the face of the earth prior to year 325 AD. It was a forgery created by early Church fathers and writers, like much of the New Testament's text:
This is the primary problem with this war on GOD that is called "Christianity". Most of its scriptures were forged and written 100s of years after Jesus' departure. Many Bible commentaries say and confirm that most of the Bible's books and gospels were:
I have thorough quote on this at:
|
Unknown dates
and authors? Keep in mind also that shortly after Jesus, 10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged. Below, you'll see that the Bible's books and gospels were:
Also keep in mind that the Bibles' words are marred with lies: |
Furthermore, other trinitarian verses had
been expunged from the
Bibles because they're forgeries:
Did Jesus ever claim to be God? (8 minutes)
Paul calls the Jewish law fables and lies (Titus 1:10-16):
|
Holy Spirit or Rolling the Dice? Jesus was also called slave of GOD in the OT many times. Trinity is a lie from Hell. Also visit: How many members are there in the Trinity? There are 39+ Holy Figures.
When it came to Collecting Money,
the Holy Spirit was all over the place (Acts 5). But when it came to selecting
the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias via a
game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result
of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy
Spirit was supposedly there from the first place. So why
couldn't It just speak Matthias' name and be done with it?
Why the game of chance
at all? We read:
Matthew 10:20
Mark 13:11
The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Where is Jesus' promise?? Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny. Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans. Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team. Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit. (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures: Let us examine the following: Romans 3:23 ESV No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
How??? How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. There is also conflict regarding misogyny: Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny. Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans. Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team. Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit. (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
Acts 1 23 So they nominated two men: Joseph called Barsabbas (also known as Justus) and Matthias. 24 Then they prayed, “Lord, you know everyone’s heart. Show us which of these two you have chosen 25 to take over this apostolic ministry, which Judas left to go where he belongs.” 26 Then they cast lots, and the lot fell to Matthias; so he was added to the eleven apostles. They rolled the dice while dismally failing to just speak Matthias' name. And we're talking about choosing the Prince of the 12th Divine Throne? As if that is not important enough for the Holy Spirit? The New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful, and for pious believers to be considered disbelievers, and for disbelievers and hypocrites to be considered pious believers. This in itself is a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the infestation of existing false prophets and messiahs [1] at the time. See also Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim about Christianity passed the test of time, and that the calendar that we use is based on Jesus' birth. But this exactly fulfills this prophecy. Time has changed and the Law has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become lawful and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25
GOD Almighty in the OT also sends
lying spirits to the false
prophets and their followers to help them grow their lies and
misleading.
See also Oxymoron
Trinity (100+
verses).
See also the ample prophecies about
the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even
mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
Also visit: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
Oxymoron Trinity
(100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter
100s of millions when he returns. The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic!
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures: Let us examine the following: Romans 3:23 ESV No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
How??? How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. There is also conflict regarding misogyny: Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny. Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans. Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team. Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit. (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
.
Quran: Bibles are mostly corrupt. Noble Verses 5:44-49 are thoroughly unpacked in this article. According to the Glorious Quran, there is nothing called new testament, or bible or even old testament. There is the Thikr of Moses, which contains the Wasaya (Commandments, which are the 600+ Law Commandments), which the Prophets before Prophet Muhammad and Islam "the prophets did judge by it" (5:44). Even in the bibles we find in Deuteronomy 4:2 and other places say that the Commandments (600+) must not be mixed with any other text. Also, the Injeel or Injil is not the NT. It is the direct commands of Prophet Eesa
Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:
The early believers were also expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:
Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!
Promised a lie? 1- Why couldn't the Holy Spirit say GOD Almighty Chose Matthias? Were they not filled with the Holy Spirit:
Mark 13:11
Matthew 10:20
Acts 13:52
Acts 2:4
Acts 4:31
2- Why did they have to roll the dice (cast lot) to randomly select Matthias? (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) "Is casting lots gambling? Casting lots or Drawing of lots may refer to: Cleromancy, a form of divination. Lottery, a form of gambling that involves the drawing of numbers for a prize. Sortition, the practice of randomly selecting political officials from a larger pool of candidates." (Source, 2) 3- Isn't this also a form of promoting and/or legitimizing gambling (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) and sorcery and future telling through rolling the dice nonsense, since in the Bible the roll of dice was not only legitimate, but it determined the 12th disciples to replace Judas! 4- So any delusional fool out there could pray in the Name of the Lord and cast lots and whatever the result is is from GOD Almighty?? 5- And who will sit at the Throne in the End? Matthias or Judas? Also visit:
When it came to Collecting Money, the Holy Spirit was all over the place. You'll need to read Acts, chapters 3 thru 6. But here is an example:
Acts 5 So here we have a man who sold a piece of his property and donated some of it for the cause of GOD Almighty. What was the answer to his charitable deed? His heart is filled with satan because he didn't give all of the money of the property's sale. So obviously, all of the Christians today, world-wide without any exception, are liars whose hearts are filled with satan, because they all have possessions and properties that they hold on to.
The NT has unsettled open debates that their "Holy Spirit" dismally failed to settle for them, such as must the long list of 600+ Jewish Laws be upheld and followed or not? (Jeremiah 31:31–34, Isaiah 42:10-13, Deuteronomy 18:18: The Jews' Covenant will expire and will be replaced with the Gentiles' one from Arabia)> Also, conflicts rose on whether one can eat Kosher meat or not, must men get circumcised, can one eat food offered to idols, and many other issues that the disciples fought each other on. 1- Because they didn't have the Holy Spirit.
2- They couldn't agree on which candidate to choose as the
twelfth
disciple, because their heads were empty and were never filled with
the Holy Spirit. 3- GOD Almighty
would NEVER speak through rolling dice garbage, because it would
only add more suspicion and confusion. It undercuts the
credibility of the disciples.
4- The authors of the Bible have lied on Jesus and his disciples
and their history. Even the Bible's own
theologians and historians
admit that the Bible's books and gospels:
(a)- Were written by
unknown people.
I've provided ample quotes on almost every single gospel and book
at:
www.answering-christianity.com/authors_gospels.htm.
Allah Almighty Said
in the Noble Quran: "Then woe
to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is
from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!-
Woe to them for what their hands do write,
and for the gain they make thereby.
(The
Noble Quran, 2:79)"
www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm
All Thanks, Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty for
the Favor of Islam, I don't have to believe in hoaxes! The
Glorious Quran is thoroughly proven to be a Divine Miracle from
Allah Almighty. See the Glorious Quran's:
Hoaxes written?
The above clearly demonstrates that there was no Holy Spirit
inspiring the characters mentioned in the Bible's New Testament. I
am not saying all of the NT is false, but most certainly much much
of it is fabricated hoaxes. The most offensive one of them is the
fact that they had to resort to rolling the dice to choose a
disciples?
And the result from the
dice roll was from GOD??
This is no less than a blasphemy and an insult on:
1- GOD Almighty.
Why even need to roll the dice (cast
lot) when you are SUPPOSEDLY filled with the Holy
Spirit?? After all, was it a Spirit or a spit that they were filled
with? And was it GOD Almighty that made the descision or the random
chance of casting lots?
Quran Miracle:
The Jews' and Christians' scribes changed and
still change
the Words.
Proven with images, text and
videos from their corrupt
bible and books! See
how they removed words and
altered words.
Some important questions to
consider:
Why was the 12th disciple selected via rolling the dice? Is Gambling allowed in Christianity? Sam Shamoun declares that gambling is allowed in Christianity: So what do you think?
So why couldn't Jesus here just
1-
Voting among the disciples.
2-
Or playing a game of chance among the disciples.
This is a thing that GOD Almighty
supposedly has to decide for Himself. After all this is
disciple that WILL SIT AT
THE THRONE OF GOD ALMIGHTY TO JUDGE THE ISRAELITES.
So no game of chance should be allowed. Why use it when they
supposedly had the Holy Spirit speaking clearly and plainly and
directly to them?
Doesn't this look like a
fabricated lie
on GOD Almighty to you??
It sure stinks like a rotten dead flesh to me! Why was the 12th disciple selected via rolling the dice? Is Gambling allowed in Christianity? Sam Shamoun declares that gambling is allowed in Christianity:
The Martyrs Lie:
Were the disciples
martyred?
Some might answer the above
objections by saying that yes GOD Almighty chose the game of chance
to determine the 12th disciple, and the proof for this is the fact
that the disciples were all or most martyred in the cause of
spreading Christianity. So therefore, since they died for what
they believed in, then they certainly have died for something they
very strongly believed was the Truth. And since they all or
many of them did it, then this could not have been a fabricated lie.
Response:
1-
There is not one confirmed fact that any of the disciples was
martyred for his belief. All of these claims of martyrdoms
were written by Church fathers in the 3rd and 4th century.
That's at least 200 years
after Jesus' departure.
"Summary: The
Bible only mentions the deaths of two
apostles, James who was put to death by Herod Agrippa I in 44 AD and
Judas Iscariot who committed suicide shortly after the death of
Christ. The details of the deaths of
three of the apostles (John, the Beloved, Bartholomew and Simon the
Canaanite) are not
known at all, either by tradition or early historians.
The deaths of the other seven apostles are known by tradition or the
writings of early Christian historians. According to traditions and
the Bible, eight of the Apostles died as
Martyrs. At least two of the Apostles,
Peter and Andrew were crucified." (Source)
2-
The Bible declares that Jesus never died:
The
lying spirits from GOD that He sends to
false prophets and their people. Also the Glorious Quran's
4:156-158 ("shubbiha
lahum" (appeared to them) and Christianity's
conjecture) Noble Verses
are thoroughly covered below. Jesus became a
lying spirit (Matthew
7:22-23): 25 Thrones of Messiahs: Twenty four (24) other Thrones and Mansions and Messiahs. In Revelations 4 & 5, there are 24 other Thrones and Mansions besides Jesus'.
All 25 Messiahs built their Heavens: GOD has 25 Messiahs (Revelations 4 & 5), and everyone of them created their Heaven via GOD's Command. Similarly, GOD had Jesus also create his own Heaven (Hebrews 1:2, Hebrews 1:1-4, Hebrews 1:10-12, Psalm 102:25-27), and Jesus is a greater builder than Moses (Hebrews 3:3, Numbers 12:7). But GOD is the Grand Builder of all things (Hebrews 3:1-4, Psalm 102:25-27): Hebrews 3:4 "Of course, every house is built by someone (i.e., its own Messiah and his subjects), but GOD is the one who built everything".
GOD is the Grand Builder of All. All have limited ability of creating (ex: my father's sperm and mother's egg uniting and creating my body). But all create and work together via GOD's Grand Design and Command. And all 25 Messiahs (Jesus is one of them) are called SLAVES OF GOD and ones who "FEAR GOD": www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_called_slave_in_bible.htm
The polytheist trinitarian pagans who use Hebrews 1:10-12, Psalm 102:25-27 to desperately prove that Jesus is GOD Almighty are all liars. Jesus in all of his glory remains nothing but a slave of GOD Almighty, and His Creation (from His Word). Both the Glorious Quran and bibles declare this. Jesus himself said there are many Mansions in GOD's Heaven. Jesus also said only GOD Alone decides who gets to sit on his immediate right and left from the disciples.Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans. Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team. Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit. (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
Begged GOD: Why did Jesus amputate his own testicles???
John 11: Jesus cried for the death of his friend and begged GOD to raise him. He also could not even perform a single Miracle without GOD's enablement & permission first. Totally Powerless: John 5:30 "I cannot do anything on my own." John 5:31 "if I (Jesus) bear witness of myself, then I would be a liar!"
He is not GOD From www.answering-christianity.com/trinity_crucified.htm#permission:
Matthew 9:3-4 (CEV)
Mark 10:18 ""Why do you call me good ἀγαθόν (agathon)?" Jesus answered. "No one is good--except God alone."
Notice in the following 2 Chronicles 18:18-22 how GOD has called unto all of them to have volunteers to convert into lying spirit:
2 Chronicles 18:18-22 1 Kings 22:23 "So now the LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouths of all these prophets of yours. The LORD has decreed disaster for you."
Because GOD despised the Jews: Christianity is a lying spirit because GOD Almighty despised the Jews. Many verses show that the GOD of the bibles greatly despised the Jews. He called them liars even from their birth. He also said that their writings of the bibles are full of lies [2]. And He considered their lives worthless (example: GOD slaughtered millions of them and saved only 7,000 (seven thousand): 1 Kings 19:18, Romans 11:4. Another example, GOD Almighty killed 70,000 Jews for David's crime in 1 Chronicles 21:8-30). Rebecca put goat skin on Jacob's back to mimic Esau's back to fool blind Isaac into anointing Jacob while thinking he was anointing Esau. Isaac wanted to anoint Esau and Rebecca wanted to anoint Jacob. Esau had hair-full shoulders while Jacob had hairless shoulders. Jacob was anointed via a lie [1]. Other similar examples also listed in the link. So GOD sending them a grand lying spirit, Jesus, to thoroughly grow and complete their lies, and bury them in conjecture and confusion is something suitable for their doings. Also remember: Matthew 8:10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.
Keep in mind also that Jesus has the spirit of "fearing GOD" in him. So he was definitely one of the created Spirits from among the "multitudes" of creations that were standing on the "right and left" Hands of GOD Almighty in 2 Chronicles 18:18 above. See also: Jesus was created from the Word. Jesus is also spirit:
Romans 8:9 Anyone who
does not have the
Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit:
The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic!
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures: Let us examine the following: Romans 3:23 ESV No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
How??? How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. There is also conflict regarding misogyny: Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny. Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans. Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team. Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit. (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
.. Jesus also spoke in diversions and not give straight forward answers (ex: him speaking about resurrection and marriage, which are not related, because marriage happens in Heaven, not at resurrection), all of this and more says that Jesus was highly problematic to his followers. Allah Almighty summed up Christianity in one Word: "they follow nothing but conjecture". This is thoroughly discussed below.
Christianity is the light of satan: 2 Corinthians 11:13-14 13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 14 And no marvel, for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Christianity is a religion of satan, the Angel of Light:
Correction: "The lying spirit himself transformed into Christ." There. The confusion is now all cleared!
Anthony Rogers demonstrates that Paul was false from his bibles: Revelation 2:2-3: False churches that are to GOD are synagogues of satan. Paul never met Jesus in person. Paul fought the disciples who supposedly lived with false gospel, and that people must stay away from them. https://www.answering-christianity.com/conflict.htm https://www.answering-christianity.com/ac6.htm#paul Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny.
Mary's Seed vs. Satan: See also the following passages about Mary's future male child who will have ample struggles with satan (the anti-christ) on earth: Genesis 3:14-16, Genesis 37:5-11, Jeremiah 4:31, Isaiah 7:14, Revelation 12:1-6. None of these verses prove that Mary or Jesus is Divine. In fact, praying "Amen" for Jesus' and Mary's little glories proves that they are no more than creations of GOD Almighty. The Holy Spirit and the Word are creations of Allah Almighty that work by the Command of Allah Almighty in order to to create beings. The Holy Spirit is also used to guide the believing beings. Nothing is comparable to Allah Almighty: "And there is none like unto Him. (The Glorious Quran, 112:4)". This is all also thoroughly proven in many verses at:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.
And here in Matthew 7:22-23, Jesus is telling them that most of them will end up in Hell; all disciples included , and they did Indeed have spiritual conflicts and fights with each other. Also, most of Christians throughout history had always been polytheist trinitarian pagans. The pagans are indeed anti-GOD:
Let us look at 4183:
NASB Translation
Indeed, Jesus' confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic language, riddles and hyperboles that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOD-sent lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23 exactly as GOD Almighty did to false people in 2 Chronicles 18:18-22.
Disciples' spiritual conflicts with each other: The disciples had conflicts with each other. - Paul called the disciples' teachings "anathema" (cursed by GOD).- Paul called the disciples' teachings bewitchment by satan. - Paul despised Peter and other disciples. - Where is the Holy Spirit again???
Insufficient Jesus: Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Paul's contradictions and corruptions. Also on
2 Chronicles 18:18-22, there are also
twenty other Thrones and Mansions and Messiahs. Jesus has a Throne and his
Heaven is his Mansion. Also in Revelations 4 & 5, there are 24 other Thrones and
Mansions. Jesus himself said there are
many Mansions in GOD's
Heaven. Jesus himself said only GOD Alone decides who gets to sit on his
immediate
right and left
from the disciples. The following articles will shed ample more
light on this:
How many members are there in the Trinity? There are
39+
Holy Figures. The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic!
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures: Let us examine the following: Romans 3:23 ESV No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
How??? How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. There is also conflict regarding misogyny: Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny. Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans. Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team. Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit. (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
. Is Allah the greatest deceiver? Allah Almighty deceives evil for the sake of Good. See ample Noble Verses proving this. See also the lying spirits in the OT that GOD Almighty sends to false prophets and their followers to make them continue to lie. 2 Chronicles 18:18-22: Jesus was commanded into a lying spirit along with many other (spirits / angles) multitudes of Beings on the Right and Left of GOD Almighty.
The Bibles are all
corrupt. The Glorious Quran also declares them all to be
corrupt. The Glorious Quran also confirms the Messiah,
Eesa
From
Jesus' problematic hyperboles.
Confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic language, riddles and hyperboles falsely
made sinful lawful and
lawful sinful
(ex:
pork
became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many
other
blasphemies and quackery).
See also
Oxymoron Trinity
(100+ verses). Bibles: Jesus will slaughter 100s of millions when he returns. The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic!
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures: Let us examine the following: Romans 3:23 ESV No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
How??? How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. There is also conflict regarding misogyny: Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny. Which book were the people of the Book reciting (فسأل الذين يقرؤون الكتاب) during Prophet Muhammad's days according to the Glorious Quran 10:94?
Edward Dalcour says that Jesus would be insufficient if Paul was proven to be false:
Does Noble Verse 9:31 say that Allah and Jesus are two equal Lords? Also, thorough refutation to توحيد الربوبية (tawheed alruboobiyyah, or Oneness of Lordship between Jesus and Allah) concept by the polytheist trinitarian pagans. Satan & Peter VS. Paul: 2 Corinthians 12:7-11. Paul literally put Peter and Satan in one team. Paul ordered the execution (actual killing) of some sinners.Paul ate his vomit. (Sam Shamoun declares gambling is allowed in Christianity) Jesus amputated his unholy balls to remain holy. If his body was holy, were his testicles cursed and unholy, especially that he commanded the maiming of sinful body parts? They were not part of the Creator of the Universe's body?? Really???
Why did Jesus amputate his own (NT calls them satanic flesh) testicles?
.. Trinity is a lie from Hell.
3- Not only that, but Israel has faced a major wholesale slaughter by Titus and his army in year 70 AD. So many had died just for being Jews. And all of the disciples of Jesus were Jewish. And certainly many martyrdom stories were written in Israel and abroad. Every hero had to be martyred to further legitimize the cause. And so therefore, many fabricated stories were invented regarding the disciples to raise their heroism. Not only that, but all of the Bible's accounts are highly doubtful. The Bible's own theologians thoroughly admit this in all of the Bibles' commentaries: So now based on what objective grounds should we reject the claim about the Bible's New Testament's accounts being mostly false and fabricated by men?
4- Islam's Divine Miracles:
Take care, |
The Gospel of Mark:
This gospel is the oldest and is supposedly the most original one in the New Testament.
"Although the book is
anonymous, apart from the ancient heading
"According to Mark" in manuscripts,
it has traditionally been assigned to John
Mark, in whose mother's house (at Jerusalem) Christians assembled.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1064)"
"Although there is no direct internal evidence of authorship, it was the unanimous testimony of the early church that this Gospel was written by John Mark. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1488)"
"Traditionally, the gospel is said to have been
written shortly before A.D. 70 in Rome, at a time of impending
persecution and when destruction loomed over Jerusalem.
(The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page
1064)"
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"
"This verse, which reads, "But if you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive your transgressions," is omitted in the best manuscripts. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1081)"
"This passage, termed the Longer Ending to the Marcan gospel by comparison with a much briefer conclusion found in some less important manuscripts, has traditionally been accepted as a canonical part of the gospel and was defined as such by the Council of Trent. Early citations of it by the Fathers indicate that it was composed by the second century, although vocabulary and style indicate that it was written by someone other than Mark. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1088)"
So, in reality, we don't really know whether Mark was the sole author of this Gospel or not, nor do we know when and where the "gospel" was even written. And since The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus, then how are we to know for sure that the current "Gospel of Mark" wasn't written by some pro of Mark?
A new captured image of this book's corruption:
(http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark 16:9-20;&version=31;)
The above text reads: "The most reliable early manuscript and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."
Now my concern to this corruption and 'answer-the-problem-away' statement is that what are those so-called "reliable early manuscript(s)" and who are the "ancient witnesses"?
According to the early Christians' manuscripts, Jesus never got crucified, and trinity is a lie. The so-called "gospel of Mark", along with all of the "gospels" of the NT, were written by third-party narration, as clearly demonstrated and shown in the sections below. People wrote on the tongue of Jesus' Disciples those books. They are neither original nor are the Pure Word of GOD Almighty.
If the "gospel of Mark" was indeed Divine and from GOD Almighty, then we wouldn't have this corruption, that they're admitting above, in it.
I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!
Further regarding this Gospel, we read the following commentary about Mark 16:9-20:
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"
This quote raises a very serious issue here. First of all, as we've seen above in the first quote, we have no evidence that proves that John Mark was the sole author of this so called "Gospel". Second of all, we see that this Gospel has some serious problems/suspicions in it. The issue of Mark 16:9-20 is a scary one, because many Christian cults today use poisonous snakes in their worship and end up dying.
Removing Mark 16:9-20 is quite appreciated by me personally (to be quite honest with you), because it prevents people from dying from snake bites. But however, the serious issue of man's corruption of the Bible remains.
We can be absolutely certain now that the above quotes prove without a doubt that the Bible is doubtful. The quote "or its original ending has been lost" proves that what we call today "Gospels" were not written by their original authors such as Mark, John, Matthew, etc... It proves that the Gospel had been tampered with by man. Let alone considering it as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.
If John Mark wasn't the one who wrote Mark 16:9-20, then who did? And how can you prove the ownership of the other person? Let alone proving that it was GOD Almighty's Revelation. And as we saw in the first quote above, we don't even know that John Mark was indeed the one who wrote the so called "Gospel of Mark".
To say the least in our case here, we now have enough evidence to discard the entire Gospel of Mark from the Bible, because you can't take bits and pieces of it and say some of it belongs to him and some of it doesn't! Let alone considering the entire corrupted Gospel as the True Living Word of GOD Almighty, which is a complete blasphemy.
Please visit A dangerous forgery was inserted at the end of the so-called "Gospel of Mark".
Here is an email that I received from a Christian
regarding
Mark 16:17-18. Emphasis
below are mine:
From: R.Mercer
To: Osama Abdallah
Subject: I Totally Agree
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:41:57 -0700
"What credibility does Christianity have when it scriptures are
littered
with such dangerous and obvious forgeries?"
You summed it up very well on your web page. That is my question
entirely. Just what are we to believe? If forgeries have been proven to
exist in the Bible, then how many more must there be? What about the
chapters and verses we all guide our whole life/styles by? Are they
forgeries, too?
This verse in Mark 16:17-18, has always bothered me. I have, and
still do believe the rest of that passage (laying on of hands, healing
the sick,...), so how can that part of the passage be true when the
serpent part is forged?
I know the part on drinking any poison says "IF", but the part on
taking up serpents says "SHALL", which has always been a problem for me
to believe. Imagine us all being forced to take up serpents in order to
serve God.
On the other hand, if this was forged, then that creates an even
bigger concern for me. Not knowing what text in our Bible is authentic
and what is not.
Thanks for letting me take up so much of your time. Like I said
before, this passage always bothered me, probably more so than any other.
Thanks, once again. Good Day.
The Book of 1 and 2 Peter:
"Some modern scholars on the basis of a number of features that they consider incompatible with Petrine authenticity, regard the letter as the work of a later Christian writer. Such features include the cultivated Greek in which it is written, difficult to attribute to a Galilean fisherman, together with its use of the Greek Septuagint translation when citing the Old Testament; the similarity in both thought and expression to the Pauline literature; and the allusions to widespread persecution of Christians, which did not occur until at least the reign of Domitian (A.D. 81-96). In this view the letter would date from the end of the first century or even the beginning of the second, when there is evidence for persecution of Christians in Asia Minor. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1348)"
"Nevertheless, acceptance of 2 Peter into the New Testament canon met with great resistance in the early church. The oldest certain reference to it comes from Origen in the early third century. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1354)"
"Among modern scholars there is wide agreement that 2 Peter is a pseudonymous work, i.e., one written by a later author who attributed it to Peter. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1354)"
So like the rest of the books and gospels of the Bible, we don't even know regarding 1 Peter:
The Book of Acts:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"
So based on some conclusion, you're willing to die for defending the idea that the Book of Acts was the True Word of GOD Almighty? If the book was inspired by GOD Almighty, then how come it wasn't mentioned in the book itself to help us filter it out from the many other "Satanic false books"? Are we sure that this book too is not a man-made Satanic book?
After all, its just a conclusion, isn't it?
Beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 80-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus. So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering it as the True Living Word of GOD.
Please visit:
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
The Gospel of Luke:
"The identification of Luke as the author is primarily based on the "we" passages in Acts (beginning in Acts 16:10), which indicate that Luke was associated with Paul in his ministry and wrote down the account of his activities. (The Amplified Bible, Page 1153)"
The only proof that they have about Luke being the sole author of this gospel is a weak speculation on "we". This is absurd at best! This speculation shows:
It is also worth mentioning that the author of the book of Acts is also unknown as shown above:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"
So their whole speculation is absurd at best!
There is a serious forgery about Jesus' "resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't! Let us look at Luke 24:44-48 from the NIV Bibles:
Luke 24
44 He said to them, "This is what I told you while I
was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of
Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms."
45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
46 He told them, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and
rise from the dead on the third day,
47 and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all
nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 You are witnesses of these things.
Luke 24:44-48 says that it is written in the Law of Moses (i.e., the Torah) that Jesus will die and resurrect on the third day. Where in the entire Old Testament (not just in the 5 books of Moses that make up the Law of Moses or the Torah) do you have that?! Show me one Old Testament verse that prophesized about Jesus' third day resurrection?
In fact, in my article Answering Isaiah 53, I clearly proved that the Old Testament actually confirms the Noble Quran's claims about Jesus never got crucified! Let alone dying and resurrecting on the third day!
Anyway, Let us see what the NIV Bible's theologians said about this book:
"The author's name does not appear in the book, but much unmistakable evidence points to Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1529)"
Again, we don't know for sure whether it was Luke or not who wrote the "Gospel of Luke" since his name doesn't appear in the Book. The Gospel itself seems to be a compromising one to the Word of GOD. Let us look at the following:
"Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, (Luke 1:3)"
Few problems with this Gospel from the quote above:
1- The author was not inspired, and knew for sure that he was not inspired by GOD Almighty to write the Book since he didn't mention about any divine inspiration, and he said "...since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning..." Where do we see GOD's inspiration in this?
2- The author wrote it for the purpose of "his most excellent Theophilus." Since when we compromise GOD Almighty and document His Holy Words for the purpose of other higher (in rank) human beings?
I say it again, I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!
Also, beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus. So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering as the True Living Word of GOD.
Further from brother Vipor Poison; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:
Luke 1:3
Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it
seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus,
The following is from the Catholic Encyclopedia:
http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625b.htm
http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625a.htm
If Theophilus existed in either the 2nd or the 4th centuries then how could the writer of this gospel be the same Luke who is supposed to be with Jesus in the 1st century.
Maybe he lived to about 200 years.. :)
From brother Amir
AbdulRahim; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:
The subject of Mankind's Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have taken a closer look at this subject. Its seems it's not only your site that brings this subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.
For example, an article in the Catholic Encyclopaedia that you mentioned in regard to
the 'Theophilus' mentioned in Luke's Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of
The Bible? article) testifies to this fact (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm):
"IV. TRANSMISSION OF THE TEXT
No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author-- all have been in some way altered. The material conditions under which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440), the little care of the copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different from the desire of accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find between various manuscripts of the same work. To these causes may be added, in regard to the Scriptures, exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies. To exempt the sacred writings from ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and it has not been the will of God to exercise this providence."
Lets just go through that again - "No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--all have been in some way altered." All have been in some way altered! In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any muslim, to follow an impure book?
When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur'an, there's no contest!
The Book of Hebrews:
"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1856)"
So because the guy was supposedly "well known (which we don't really know that for sure anyway)", then would that give us the right to consider his words as the Words of GOD Almighty?! I am sorry, but I don't really see the logic behind this! The Book of Hebrews is one of the highly used Books among Christians. I hear references from it a lot when listening to Christians preaching. Yet, no one really knows who wrote it!. This is quite ironic, because Christians use such highly doubtful books in their teachings as if they were the True Living Words of GOD Almighty. I don't care what you call this, but I call it blasphemy, because it is the most ridiculous insult to GOD Almighty and His Holy Words that I have ever seen.
I just hope you see the real cheap quality in the religion of Christianity, with all my respect due to every Christian reader.
Please visit:
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
The Gospel of 1 John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"
"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
| 1 John and Galatians
forgeries:
From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm: 3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter: John 21:24-25
"We know that his testimony is true"?! Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person? Below in this article, we see:
The Gospel of 1 John: Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel: "....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)" "The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
1 John forgeries: 1 John forgeries by church fathers: The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=3480.msg16733#msg16733: By Mustafa Ahmad It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by Christians against Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") fail! But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8) Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2:22)
1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 3rd century P46 . We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct evidence that Paul wrote it. 2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is the antichrist. This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 4th century GA 01, א - Codex Sinaiticus. We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct evidence that John wrote it. How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") don’t even go back to the "alleged authors". |
1 John forgeries:
1 John forgeries by church fathers:
The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
| From
www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm:
Walid Shoebat said that Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") deny the Father and Son, and the Bible in 1 John 2:22 states clearly that who ever denies that Jesus is the Christ is the liar: 1 John 2:18-27 2- The author himself (of 1 John) makes it clear that he's writing from his own head without Divine inspirations. Notice his wrong prediction about his followers living in the "last hour" and that the reason it is the last hour was because they've had an epidemic of anti-Christs coming and going during their time. |
The Book of Revelation:
Paul proves the book of Revelation is a forgery; a book of misogyny.
"The author of the book calls himself John, who because of his Christian faith has been exiled to the rocky island of Patmos, a Roman penal colony. Although he never claims to be John the apostle, he was so identified by several of the early church Fathers, including Justin, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Terullian, Cyprian, and Hippolytus. This identification, however, was denied by other Fathers, including Denis of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nazianzen, and John Chrysostom. Indeed, vocabulary, grammar, and style make it doubtful that the book could have been put into its present form by the same persons responsible for the fourth gospel. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1373)"
"Four times the author identifies himself as John (1:1,4,9; 22:8).....In the third century, however, an African bishop named Dionysius compared the language, style and thought of the Apocalypse (Revelation) with that of the other writings of John and decided that the book could not been written by the apostle of John. He suggested that the author was a certain John the Presbyter, whose name appears elsewhere in ancient writings. Although many today follow Dionysius in his view of authorship, the external evidence seems overwhelmingly supportive of the traditional view. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1922)"
Again, we don't know who wrote the Book of Revelation. It is certainly highly doubtful that it was written by Apostle John. The Theologians and Historians of the NIV Bible seem to agree with the invalidity of this book from the above quote. So are you now going to consider the other John's words as the Words and Inspirations of GOD Almighty?
As we see, the style of writing in the book of Revelation is different from the books that are believed to be from John which are the Gospel of John, 1 John, 2 John and 3 John. The book of Revelation's style seems to be closer to John the Presbyter's writings. This man is known in ancient writings. There are also many Christian theologians today that hold the same view about the falsety of the book of Revelation.
Isn't this sufficient enough to prove that the book is doubtful?
Notice that in the sections of "Gospel of John" and "Gospels of 1, 2 & 3 John" above, the author did not identify himself and it was ASSUMED without actual proofs that it was Saint John who wrote them. Notice how they said that if he were to identify himself, then it would be hard for them to explain it.
Now, notice the author in the Book of Revelation does identify himself as John, but he has a complete different language and style of writing from the other books, which created much uncertainty about its validity in the Church.
My questions here are: Who wrote the Books? And is or is not Saint John supposed to identify himself in his books? And where are his books that have his name on them?
Again, keep in mind that the NT was not even documented on paper until 150 to 300 years
after Jesus (depending on what Christian you talk to). So the dating is way too long
for us to be assuming books to belong to certain people. Let alone considering their
nonsense (contents) as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.
Sam Shamoun: If Catholicism is false, then the entire NT is a fraud, and there is "no Christianity". It would be like the "pagan worship of Baal". Sam Shamoun also declares the 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries, and declares that if you study the bible logically, then you will become an atheist.
Please visit: Jesus the "Alpha and Omega". Not only this quote doesn't prove Jesus as GOD, but it was also written in a book that is unreliable in later bibles. In the original Bibles, the quote doesn't even exist!!
Arche of the Creation of God as Alpha and Omega. The "Alpha and Omega" doesn't even exist in the original Bibles! It's a lie that was later inserted by trinitarians. See the historical proofs in the article. If their site is down, then you can read the article at this link ON MY SITE.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
The Book of Revelation is a very important, probably the most important Book in the
Bible today, because it has prophecies in it of what Christians believe is for our future
today, even though it has nothing to do with our current world. It talks about Jesus
soon (1800 to 2000 years ago) will return (Revelation 22:7). I don't know how soon
is 2000 years to the Bible. All the people that this book was told to had died.
It also talks about the great battle of Gog and Magog fighting the righteous; "and will go out to deceive the nations in the four
corners of the earth [The earth DOES NOT
have four corners and no the earth is not a square or rectangle. It is round almost
like an egg!!]--Gog and Magog--to gather them for battle. In
number they are like the sand on the seashore. (From
the NIV Bible, Revelation 20:8)"
The thing that we need to notice here beside the grave error about the shape of the earth
in this false book (sorry to say that), is that the Gog and Magog existed before.
Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal (Ezekiel 39:1), is the name of the leader and
Magog is the name of his nation (Ezekiel 38 and 39). The Gog and Magog army had
already been defeated and the Noble Quran confirms their story.
There had been historical discoveries that perfectly match the Noble Quran's
claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as the discovery of the "Iron Gates",
and other literature that mentions the Gog and Magog army and location. There is even historical documentation about them which matches the Noble Quran
in London, England.
Please visit The story of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran and the Bible to see the references and proofs of these historical discoveries and several more.
The Bible says: The earth is flat! See all the verses in the Bible that claim the earth is flat.
It is a common Christian answer to say "We support Israel because it is God's promised land to the Jews, and He will prevail them against the army of Gog and Magog who seems to be mainly an Islamic army today." They mostly rely on the Book of Revelation from the Bible to support this claim.
The story of the Gog and Magog army attacking the Jews exists in both the Book of Ezekiel and the Book of Revelation in the Bible. The Book of Ezekiel which came literally thousands of years before the Book of Revelation predicted the attack and defeat of the army of Gog and Magog.
The Noble Quran (The Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more")' Holy Scripture) talks about the army of Gog and Magog in details and explains the events that ALREADY took place. As I mentioned above, there had been historical discoveries that perfectly match the Noble Quran's claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as the discovery of the "Iron Gates", and other literature that mentions the Gog and Magog army and location.
Please visit The army of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran and the Bible.
The lie (sorry to say that) of the Book of Revelation, however, also predicts the coming of the army of Gog and Magog. But as I said, the army of Gog and Magog were ALREADY predicted in the Bible thousands of years before the Book of Revelation.
So, the prediction in the Book of Revelation proves that the writer of the book, lacked a great deal of knowledge about history, because as I said, the event of the Gog and Magog battle (i.e., the battle of Armageddon) already happened!
The point is that the Book of Revelation, however, like most of the Bible today seems to be nothing but a big hoax (sorry to say that). It is very doubtful, but yet ironically, very important to the Christians of today.
Would you honestly deep inside yourself call nonsense of this kind the True Living Words of GOD Almighty, especially after knowing that very important early Christian resources thought "the book could not been written by the apostle of John"?
Please visit What parts of the Bible do Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") believe in?
|
Oxymoron Trinity [1]: From www.answering-christianity.com/trinity_crucified.htm#permission:
Matthew 9:3-4 (CEV)
Mark 10:18 ""Why do you call me good ἀγαθόν (agathon)?" Jesus answered. "No one is good--except God alone."
Jesus was also called slave of GOD in the OT many times. Trinity is a lie from Hell. Also visit: How many members are there in the Trinity? There are 39+ Holy Figures. The disciples arguing about the Sabbath and other Laws. Jesus promised them that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths and that there will be no arguments, confusions or riddles. Yet, the NT is marred with open arguments, vilifications (calling each other cursed by GOD "anathema", satanic, false, wrong). Where is Jesus' promise?? Totally a false promise! - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over their mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic!
Where was the Holy Spirit in all of this?
Remember: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Dismal Spiritual Failures: Let us examine the following: Romans 3:23 ESV No man is sinless and faultless. The NT even says Jesus himself sinned via coveting the sins of the world. Paul then barfs the following gem:
1 Corinthians 2:15
How??? How can any flesh and blood sinner not be subjected to judgment? The world has seen how disastrous your pedophilic and corrupt priests, ministers and churches are, from sex abuse on children, theft, prostitution and so much more. Ironically also, Paul and the disciples themselves dismally failed this standard when they turned into rabid dogs in harsh judgments on each other; calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic! |
=
War on GOD