Mary: Fornicate with you "in my mother's bed" [1]??? | 200 years no gospels | 24 other thrones besides Jesus' | Jesus was created | What's new | A-Z library (3300+ articles) | "Muslims" was the original title | Quran Search | Quran Moral Code (100s of them) | Quran: Bibles are filled with corrupt قول qaowl (doctrines of sayings and writings) | "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah | Jesus said he was powerless | Paul wasn't sure about the Holy Spirit | Paul commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11â€"13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages | Research & Blog | 9/11 Israel-lie | Youtube | 
The Romans had to fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]
1-
When was the New Testament written?
How big was the first New Testament?
(google). The
Roman massacres
also wiped out the original texts.
Hardly a total of 2 pages, and it was written 100 to 200 years after Jesus. Not early enough by any stretch.
Also, the first 200 years there were no gospels or writings, and they admit that much forgeries were "fairly common":
Also visit section #4 below: 4-
The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered" [4].
What about NT manuscripts immediately after Jesus?
Zero
were ever found.
They
were
never
found because none of the writings that were ever made have survived:
what_christians_do_not_know_about_their_holy_book_
www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNZ5dcsJaeJ3NWwvDoFuyzufcRfwJcDia
Only
centuries-late small
11 fragments of Papayris
were found and at a much latter date, which collectively were less than 2 pages
altogether. A papayri (papyrus) is a scroll,
which is equivalent to a letter-size page. The 11 fragments found were
dated between years 100 to 300. So
even those are not even original, but are copies of copies of copies of copies and
documentations of oral church teachings and fabrications. At any rate, the 11 fragments
of papayris found are. They're hardly worth showing or be given a
URL-link. They hardly fill 2 pages when put together:
Papayri P52 "The earliest extant
fragment of the New Testament is the Rylands Library
Papyrus P52, a piece of
the
Gospel of John dated
to the first half of the
2nd century."
(Dating the Bible - Wikipedia)
"The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear
around 200,
and the earliest complete copy of the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus dates
to the
4th century."
(Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia
and
Google Search)
Six other
small fragments found were dated to the 2nd or 3rd centuries.
Not even worthy of being URL-linked:
Papayri P32
The so-called
"5800
Greek manuscripts
of the New Testament, with an astounding 2.6 million
pages of
biblical text"
were all writings from
5th
to the 19th
century in so many languages.
Like all other false religions' writings, these are irrelevant writings of
church fathers and people that are similar to articles Christians write today on
blogs and websites. They are totally irrelevant to the question at hand
and have nothing to do with the earliest manuscripts that don't seem to to have
ever existed, from the first place, during the time of Jesus and early
believers (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Also, Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries
bibles-writings are forgeries:
If Paul is false, then Jesus
is insufficient:
www.youtube.com/@Albyyinah
www.youtube.com/@Albyyinah/videos
Papayri P90
Papayri P104 (only 6.35 cm by 9.5cm in size)
Papayri P98
Papayri P137
Papayri P46
Papayri P66
Papayri P77
Papayri P103
Majuscule GA0189
Holy Gambling:
Sam Shamoun promoted Christianity's Holy Gambling, and he even funded other gamblers. He himself spent 10s of thousands of dollars on it. Also, the 12th disciple, Mathias, was chosen via gambling by the other disciples. They literally rolled the holy dice [1] amongst each other to choose him from among other choices. Then they claimed it was the Holy Spirit that chose him (??). Dice and chance had nothing to do with it.
Plus, Jews and Christians went through waves and waves of Roman massacres, and
their texts were wholesale burnt:
|
Roman massacres: It is also important to know that the following seven Roman Emperors have thoroughly burned all (burnt all) of the early believers' writings:
1. Nero
(54-68) Read all the details with references here. Also visit: How big was the first New Testament?What we have today from "gospels" and "New Testament" were written 100 years to 300 years after Jesus' departure from this earth. So, the current writings that we have are not original writings. Also, to appease the Roman Empire's 3-headed pagan religion and practices, the pagan 3-headed trinity was invented [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Many lies had been fabricated after the original writings were all lost. The Jews and Christians of Arabia, however, did have writings that predicted the coming of Prophet Muhammad. These were some of the original texts that survived. The early believers were expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:
Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!
Prophet "AHMAD" is found in the
Dead Sea Scrolls:
(Clip also in this article) Prophet Muhammad in the previous Scriptures. Prophet Muhammad was thoroughly foretold in the Bible, and his prophetic Name, "Ahmed", was also found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and it was mentioned precisely in the Glorious Quran for the Prophet to be foretold by this very Name, Ahmed [1] [2]. |
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Holy Gambling:
Sam Shamoun promoted Christianity's Holy Gambling, and he even funded other gamblers. He himself spent 10s of thousands of dollars on it. Also, the 12th disciple, Mathias, was chosen via gambling by the other disciples. They literally rolled the holy dice [1] amongst each other to choose him from among other choices. Then they claimed it was the Holy Spirit that chose him (??). Dice and chance had nothing to do with it.
Also, Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:
If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
|
Four false promises made by Jesus
regarding the Holy Spirit: 1- Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you. So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus? Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself? You had no need for this. Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you? Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie? The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol. Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...). Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan. Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus? Or were you someone's girlfriend? Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan? And why did you then keep your eyes?? Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?
Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11–13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.
Even the 12th disciple was chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots), - a game of chance, - and not by the Holy Spirit. Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell. Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD
sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
2- If a snake bites you and runs
its poison through your blood, it will not hurt you (Mark 16:17-18). Jesus even promised in the plural that you will be picking up deadly snakes and they will inject their poisons into you and you shall not be harmed!. This false prophesy is one of the NT's biggest lies, because it never happened. Not only that, but all Christians who genuinely attempted it in the past were killed by the snakes' poisons. Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7–10). There are many problems with this: 1- Paul is a single person. Jesus' bold promise was in the plural. "The believers shall pick up poisonous snakes, and if anyone gets bit by a poisonous snake and have the poison run through their blood, the poison shall not harm any believer!". Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison. 2- It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta. Some even look like Vipers. So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one: "Four species of snakes are present (in the wild) in the Maltese Islands of which three are relatively recent additions. The only indigenous snake is the Western Whip Snake Coluber viridiflavus which is a non-poisonous species. The other three, namely Algerian Whipsnake Coluber algirus, Leopard Snake Elaphe situla and Cat Snake Telescopus fallax have been introduced by man. Of these only the latter has some form of poison. Although snakes appear in the archaeological context (eg. the stone slab in Mus of Archaeology of Gozo - from ggantija, which has a snake on its side) this does not imply that they were poisonous. On the other hand, poisonous species such as Natrix natrix which occurs in nearby Sicily may have been eradicated by man through time." (Source) 3- Jesus' promise dismally fails, and it is one of the most embarrassing lies, and most dangerous to its followers, in the New Testament, which again and again proves that Jesus was indeed a GOD-sent
lying spirit as GOD Almighty deceived false people in the Old Testament.
John 3:13-14
2 Kings 2:11
Genesis 5:24
Again,
where did Enoch and Elijah go to?
Jesus' statement is simply
a lie. He didn't know that Elijah, Enoch and others (ex: Uzair or Ezra) were taken up to
Heaven by GOD Almighty. Was he also here a
fat drunk as the NT says he was? Jesus here added Elijah and Enoch to the 39+ list of barfinity (trinity), because we now have Elijah, Enoch and Jesus as their own trinity. Moses was scared to even pass the Judgment: 2- 3- 4-
The Romans had to
fake his crucifixion due
to Passover issues:
Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other
examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent
lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23. 3- You can
lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only
one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you. Not even Jesus,
with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle. 4- Jesus
promised the disciples that after he departs it will not be them
speaking. It will be the Holy Spirit will be speaking through their
mouths. Yet, after he departed, they split into Peter and Paul opposing
teams, and they started hurling insults and accusations towards each others'
teachings, and calling each others: Anathema (cursed by GOD in Greek), follower
of Satan, your Gospel is of the devil, you are a false apostle, you are dogs,
and several other serious accusations and insults. Where was the promised
Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above?? Where is Jesus' promise?? - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - 12th disciple was also chosen by
holy gambling.
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?
Remember: If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
The one unforgivable sin?! Jesus further says: The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10). But your entire package that is called the NT and church is the greatest insult and blasphemy against GOD Almighty's Holy Spirit. It is like a prostitute preaching, and while continuing to prostitute, that the one unforgivable sin is fornication. How many times did you fornicate and continue to fornicate? How many times did you lie on the Holy Spirit and continued to lie on the Holy Spirit of GOD Almighty? Were you also a fat drunk in this one?
Was Jesus drunk? High Concentrations and Intoxication:
The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus: John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a
fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:
winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol. Of course it never did! (See Holy Spirit of Islam, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: for he (John the Baptist) will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born. So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist.  .Is John the Baptist another member of the barfinity? |
|
Satan was part of the trinity
(Ezekiel 28:13-19),
then got
subtracted
(-1):
GOD in the OT spoke a poem of regret [1] regarding Satan. GOD expresses how regretful He is that all of the Glory that He has created for and given to Satan will no longer be given to him. It was now given to a lesser second-hand, Jesus, whom otherwise would've received none of it. Jesus was GOD's plan B not A. 1. "You were perfect from the day you were created". Jesus was also created from the Word of GOD.2. Glorious. 3. "the chosen one". 4. The "Anointed". 5. ruler over earth. 6. Ruler over the "Holy Mount" of GOD.
Question to every polytheist trinitarian pagan: If Jesus replaced Satan, then: 1- How can Jesus be our Creator? 2- How can Satan be part of a trinity? 3- How can Jesus be given the glory that was created for and given to satan, not Jesus, and Jesus still be considered our Creator? 4- How come Satan was the primary and Jesus was secondary?
Of course, there is no Trinity, and Satan was not subtracted from any Trinity. The above exposes the lie of trinity; a word that does not even exist in any of the Jewish and Christian scriptures (Bibles and outside Bibles). Also, since we have
24 other thrones besides Jesus'
And Melchizedek was Jesus' Elder in Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20. Then, we also clearly have Satan as: 1- One of the elders and had his throne. 2- Satan too was Jesus' elder. 3- When compared to Melchizedek and Satan, Jesus was secondary.
Angels are scared of the mighty Satan: Even Michael, the chief angel, did not dare to insult the devil.
Using the polytheist trinitarian pagans' illogic, satan was indeed a Mighty Member of the Barfinity, but then got subtracted. And since satan was subtracted, then Jesus could've also gotten himself subtracted when satan made Jesus covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights. Do you see now how blasphemous and stupid Christianity is?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
|
2- Just who were the real authors of the Bible?
The sections of this article are:
1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions.
- Exposing the New Testament.
- Exposing
Paul.
- Paul
calls the Jewish law fables
and lies (Titus
1:10-16).
- Exposing the Old Testament.
- 600+ Commandments from GOD Almighty to Moses and the Israelites.
2- So who wrote the Bible then? Were they really the
original Prophets and Disciples?
3- The New Testament was written in the 4th
century by Constantine and his council by their own words.
4- The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered" [4].
5- Contradictions in
historical claims and accounts.
6- Conclusion.
7- Further Sites to Research.
8- Book Information (Bibliography).
1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions:
Below, we'll also see that the New Testamanet's gospels and books were written around between 80 to 300 years after the departure of Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
|
Unknown dates and authors? Keep in mind also that shortly after Jesus, 10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged. Below, you'll see that the Bible's books and gospels were:
Also keep in mind that the Bibles' words are marred with lies: The Bibles also state:
Also Visit: What is the definition of Messiah in the Quran? Deuteronomy 4:2 clearly declares that the Bible is corrupt! Also, which "Book" is the People of the Book? The best way to convert a non-Muslim to Islam? Covers the Hijacked Bible in great details. |
|
The Romans had to fake
his crucifixion due to Passover issues:
Never happened: 1- Jonah was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive!
2- Jesus
laid on the floor in a tomb (a
cave-like room) as
shown above,
got healed, and got up and left. He
was never
inside any coffin nor
ever got buried. 3- The Jewish Passover, where 1/2 million pilgrims were about to arrive, forced the Romans to abruptly end the crucifixion. Jesus only stayed for 3 hours. 100s of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers were even denied food due to lack of time. 4- Jesus never got crucified: [1] [2] [3] [4]. The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was saved.
5- The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). See also Daniel 7:25: Christianity will change time and the Law. John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol: winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol.
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: Luke 1:15 So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist.
6- Jesus' Hyperboles: Confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language falsely made sinful lawful and lawful sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples.
This statement "shall be buried deep in the heart of earth for 3 days" is a problematic, oxymoronic, self-contradicting, and exaggerated Jesus Hyperbole.
No miracle. A WWII soldier survived 63 hours on the cross by his captors. Jesus only stayed for 3 hours. Also, first 200 years there were no gospels or writings, and they admit that much forgeries were "fairly common".
Keep in mind:
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
Two Jesus: : There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty also said in the Glorious Quran:[004:156] That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge; [004:157] That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Apostle of God";-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) know ledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- [004:158] Nay, God raised him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise;- Divine Setup for Conjecture: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.  "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah Eesa is Iesu and Iesus in Latin and Greek for Jesus, and Eesa is also a Hebrew word that means doctor
"... but so it was made to appear to them..." (Quran 4:157)
The two double-Jesus men & Pontus Pilate in Matthew 27:16-17: According to the Gospel of Matthew, Pontus Pilate was standing between two double-Jesus men:
1- Jesus
Barabbas. "...The Bibles' Christ was put on the cross for three hours. Any one of us would've survived this silly crucifixion. Your human body, when faced with death, can become 10+ times stronger, more resilient, more resistant and more stubborn than normal. This is what would enable you, for example, to lift an entire truck with your bare hands if your precious child was under it. Similarly, if you were put on the cross for three silly hours, your body would've survived it. A soldier was placed on the cross for 63 hours and still lived to tell the world about it." (Source) A Divine Setup for Conjecture. And again, the "buried deep in the heart of earth" Prophecy never happened, Jesus laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and left. He was never inside any coffin nor ever got buried. Also, because 100s of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers were even denied food due to lack of time. Jonah was alive. Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive! Jesus never got crucified: [1] [2] [3] [4]. The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was saved.
Was
Jesus Christ Crucified?
Christianity's Salvation Lie:
Because
Christianity's scriptures didn't get documented for 200+
years after Jesus, the Church and Christians
had developed and invented the crucifixion lie and its requirement
to save a person from Hell (by him believing in it), which had been
thoroughly proven from both the Bible and the Glorious Quran, to be
a fabricated lie [1].
Salvation verses like John
3:16 and others are all forgeries that
were invented by liars 100s
of years after the real Eesa
Matthew 9 Matthew 5:7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy. Being Merciful to others makes you a good person. And Jesus didn't come for you if you are. Jesus didn't come to invite merciful and good people. They're already saved. They need no invitation. The Christian lie about one must accept that Jesus died on the cross for his/her sins is mandatory for their salvation, and that otherwise they'd be doomed to Hell is thoroughly destroyed in Matthew 9:12-13. In fact, both the OT and NT in many passages confirmed that GOD Almighty will save his Messiah from crucifixion and from death and harm.
Matthew 9:12-13 I have not come for you if you're a merciful Jew.
7. The New Testament further says that as Jesus grew up, he learned more and more about GOD: (Luke 2:52)
8. How is Jesus our Creator? Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
Yes, the Jews did call Ezra a special Son of GOD
with special
Divine Connections. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Gospel of John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"Many scholars of the past two centuries have denied that John wrote this book, partly because of their belief that the author fabricated many details such as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
(The Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN: 978-1-58640-275-4, Gospel of John, Page1540)""Critical Analysis makes it difficult to accept the idea that the gospel as it now stands was written by one person. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"Within the gospel itself there are also some inconsistencies. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"To solve these problems, scholars have proposed various rearrangements that would produce a smoother order. However, most have come to the conclusion that the inconsistencies were probably produced by subsequent editing in which homogeneous materials were added to a shorter original. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"Other difficulties for any theory of eyewitness authorship of the gospel in its present form are presented by its highly developed theology and by certain elements of its literary style. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"The gospel contains many details about Jesus not found in the synoptic gospels. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"The final editing of the gospel and arrangement in its present form probably dates from between A.D. 90 and 100. Traditionally, Ephesus has been favored as the place of composition, though many support a location in Syria, perhaps the city of Antioch, while some have suggested other places, including Alexandria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
| 1 John and Galatians
forgeries:
From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm: 3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter: John
21:24-25
"We know that his testimony is true"?! Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person? Below in this article, we see:
The Gospel of 1 John: Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel: "....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)" "The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
1 John forgeries: 1 John forgeries by church fathers: The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=3480.msg16733#msg16733: By Mustafa Ahmad It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by Christians against Muslims fail! But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8) Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2:22)
1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 3rd century P46 . We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct evidence that Paul wrote it. 2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is the antichrist. This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 4th century GA 01, א - Codex Sinaiticus. We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct evidence that John wrote it. How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims don't even go back to the "alleged authors". |
So again, no one knows regarding the "Gospel of John":
Also, when one reads this gospel, he would immediately notice that it was not written by John himself. Christians say that it was John the Apostle writting about John the Baptist. The evidence in the quotes above clearly proves that this is a desperate lie! I submit to you that neither John wrote anything! Let us look at the following verses from the gospel:
"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:19)"
"John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:26)"
"For John was not yet cast into prison. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:24)"
etc...
Whoever wrote the gospel, was he appointed or inspired by GOD Almighty? If yes, then who is that man? It can't be John for it is quite obvious from the above verses and many more throughout the gospel that John wasn't the original author. One has to be ridiculously biased and blind in faith to deny that.
So now, what about these most popular verses:
"In the beginning was the
Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was was God was
with authority (the
same Greek word used for satan's
rule [2]
[3]). (From
the King James Version Bible, John 1:1)"
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:16)"
These verses were obviously written by mysterious men and not by any of Jesus' original disciples. Therefore, it is blasphemy to consider such verses as Divine and to try to prove Jesus is the Creator of the Universe through them. The lie of trinity was born between the years of 150 to 300. It is quite possible and highly probable that some church wrote the so-called "Gospel of John" from excerpts that they found. Notice that there are 24,000 "letters" or papers found that were not included in today's New Testament, which means that the excerpts that were used for writing the "Gospel of John" and all of the other books and gospels of the NT are highly doubtful and contain no proof what so ever that they were written by any of Jesus' original disciples. The Gospel of John was written about John but not by the original "Saint John". Big difference and big corruption! You can't consider such rubbish as GOD Almighty's Divine Holy Words.
Again, please visit: The Gospel of John, Gospel or gossip? to see proof about early Christians rejecting the so-called Gospel of John. They believed it was all man-made.
None of Jesus' disciples witnessed the crucifixion. They "all fled" and "deserted" Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This further confirms Islam's claims.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
|
From https://www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_problematic_hyperboles.htm: .......... Infestation: Again, the New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful. This in itself is a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the infestation of existing false prophets and messiahs [1] at the time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). The analysis below clearly show that the false "Jesus" of the full-of-fabrications, the corrupt Bible, is not what Isa (eesa), the true Messiah and the son of our virgin mother Mary, is. Peace and blessings be upon Isa and his mother. We believe in the virgin birth of the Messiah, and we believe he will return to fight the armies of satan. Both the Bible and Islam agree that he will return as an Arab [2] from Damascus, Syria.
Baptist called Jesus a liar! The infestation gets even more ridiculous when we read from the NT that John the Baptist, the supposed great Prophet, called Jesus a liar before he died: Yes, John the Baptist died disbelieving in Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). |
The Gospel of Matthew:
"The unknown author, whom we shall continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience, drew no only up the Gospel according to Mark but upon a large body of material (principally, sayings of Jesus) not found in Mk that corresponds, sometimes exactly, to material found also in the Gospel according to Luke. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1008)"
"As for the place where the gospel was composed, a plausible suggestion is that it was Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1009)"
So we clearly see, both the author or authors and the place of composition of the "Gospel of Matthew" are unknown.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.
"bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah
Eesa is Iesu and Iesus in Latin and Greek for Jesus, and Eesa is also a Hebrew word that means doctor
|
Jesus Castrated Himself: Jesus amputated his own (satanic?) testicles and penis' head. He said it was to remain sanctified and holy (??) for the Kingdom of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). How is running away is actually defeating to satan's temptations? Jesus also kissed Mary Magdalene on the mouth. GOD Almighty was also "charitable" (Luke 2:52) with Jesus and forgave him.Oxymoron: Paul said maimed flesh gets sent to satan. Jesus said maim your sinful body parts. Jesus maims his testicles and the head of his penis, but also never his (satanic?) eyes. See also Oxymoron Trinity (100+ verses). All Bibles call Jesus slave of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Jesus' Hyperboles: Confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language falsely made sinful lawful and lawful sinful (ex: pork [1] became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of blasphemies and quackery) Quran: All Bibles are mostly of corrupt [1] (Quran 10:94 and 10s others discussed). See also the 39+ members of trinity. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40. |
If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Holy Gambling:
Sam Shamoun promoted Christianity's Holy Gambling, and he even funded other gamblers. He himself spent 10s of thousands of dollars on it. Also, the 12th disciple, Mathias, was chosen via gambling by the other disciples. They literally rolled the holy dice [1] amongst each other to choose him from among other choices. Then they claimed it was the Holy Spirit that chose him (??). Dice and chance had nothing to do with it.
The Romans had to fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]
Yet, Paul admits that he speaks through a lying spirit (Romans 3:7 But if through my lie God's truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?), while Jesus promised all of the disciples that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, and that it will not be them speaking, but the Holy Spirit. Yet, Paul says he was lying. 12th disciple was also chosen by holy gambling.
Only Islam completes GOD Almighty's Religion. See
ample prophecies.
Paul and his team of disciples were also calling Peter's team, - and vice versa,
- anathema
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Paul also admits that he speaks through a lying spirit:
Romans 3:7
7 But if through
my lie God's truth abounds
to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?
| NASB © | Greek | Strong's |
| But if | 1487: sometimes used with a command or as an indirect question, etc.) | |
| through | 1722: in, on, at, by, with | |
| my lie | (pseusmati) |
5582: a lie, falsehood |
See full verse and table here [2].
Yet, Jesus promised them that it
will NOT be them speaking but the Holy Spirit speaking
through their mouths??!! How is this not an oxymoron?
The twelfth (12th) disciple, Matthias, was also chosen
by rolling the dice (casting lots); via a game of chance.
Where again was the Holy Spirit in all of this? Christianity permits stealing and robbing. Robbing includes physical assault on someone. To steal something you stealthily snatch it and run away. To rob someone, you either steal from them or forcefully take it from them via assault and force. 2 Corinthians 11:8 I robbed other assemblies (often translated as churches, but the Greek ἐκκλησίας (ekklēsias) means summoned people; a group of people; assemblies, which includes non-Christians) by aggressively taking λαβὼν ("to lay hold by aggressively"; hustling; STEALING by force; robbing) their wages/salaries/money to serve you. https://biblehub.com/greek/2564.htm Christians even have this saying: "To rob Peter to pay Paul" The Glorious Quran's Scientific Miracle on Lying: The Noble Quran on the Cerebrum: Lying is generated from the person's forehead. The region in the brain that controls our movements - In Noble Quran and confirmed by Science. www.answering-christianity.com/detailed_meanings_of_scientific_words_in_verses.htm#embryology www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#embryology
Christianity permits lying while preaching. This clip shows a pastor lying while clearly knowing he was lying. Play clip here.
Robbing, hustling and stealing permitted:
https://biblehub.com/greek/1537.htm
https://biblehub.com/greek/2983.htm
https://biblehub.com/lexicon/2_corinthians/11-8.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_rob_Peter_to_pay_Paul
Quran Moral Code (100s of them)
Quran: All Bibles are mostly corrupt [1] قول (Quran 10:94 and 10s others discussed). See also the 39+ members of trinity. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.
Paul also ordered killing and maiming of flesh.
Remember:
If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Holy Gambling:
Sam Shamoun promoted Christianity's Holy Gambling, and he even funded other gamblers. He himself spent 10s of thousands of dollars on it. Also, the 12th disciple, Mathias, was chosen via gambling by the other disciples. They literally rolled the holy dice [1] amongst each other to choose him from among other choices. Then they claimed it was the Holy Spirit that chose him (??). Dice and chance had nothing to do with it.
The Romans had to fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]
Paul and his team of disciples were also calling Peter's team,
- and vice versa, - anathema
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Paul calls the Jewish law fables and lies (Titus 1:10-16).
The Gospel of Mark:
This gospel is the oldest and is supposedly the most original one in the New Testament.
"Although the book is anonymous, apart
from the ancient heading "According to Mark" in manuscripts, it
has traditionally been assigned to John Mark, in whose mother's
house (at Jerusalem) Christians assembled. (The
New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"
"Although there is no direct internal evidence of authorship, it was the unanimous testimony of the early church that this Gospel was written by John Mark. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1488)"
"Traditionally,
the gospel is said to have been written shortly before A.D. 70 in
Rome, at a time of impending persecution and when destruction loomed over
Jerusalem. (The New American Bible, ISBN:
978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"
"This verse, which reads, "But if you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive your transgressions," is omitted in the best manuscripts. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1081)"
"This passage, termed the Longer Ending to the Marcan gospel by comparison with a much briefer conclusion found in some less important manuscripts, has traditionally been accepted as a canonical part of the gospel and was defined as such by the Council of Trent. Early citations of it by the Fathers indicate that it was composed by the second century, although vocabulary and style indicate that it was written by someone other than Mark. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1088)"
So, in reality, we don't really know whether Mark was the sole author of this Gospel or not, nor do we know when and where the "gospel" was even written. And since The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus, then how are we to know for sure that the current "Gospel of Mark" wasn't written by some pro of Mark?
A new captured image of this book's corruption:
(http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark 16:9-20;&version=31;)
The above text reads: "The most reliable early manuscript and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."
Now my concern to this corruption and 'answer-the-problem-away' statement is that what are those so-called "reliable early manuscript(s)" and who are the "ancient witnesses"?
According to the early Christians' manuscripts, Jesus never got crucified, and trinity is a lie. The so-called "gospel of Mark", along with all of the "gospels" of the NT, were written by third-party narration, as clearly demonstrated and shown in the sections below. People wrote on the tongue of Jesus' Disciples those books. They are neither original nor are the Pure Word of GOD Almighty.
If the "gospel
of Mark" was indeed Divine and from
GOD Almighty, then we wouldn't have
this corruption, that they're
admitting above, in it.
I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!
Further regarding this Gospel, we read the following commentary about Mark 16:9-20:
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"
This quote raises a very serious issue here. First of all, as we've seen above in the first quote, we have no evidence that proves that John Mark was the sole author of this so called "Gospel". Second of all, we see that this Gospel has some serious problems/suspicions in it. The issue of Mark 16:9-20 is a scary one, because many Christian cults today use poisonous snakes in their worship and end up dying.
Removing Mark 16:9-20 is quite appreciated by me personally (to be quite honest with you), because it prevents people from dying from snake bites. But however, the serious issue of man's corruption of the Bible remains.
We can be absolutely certain now that the above quotes prove without a doubt that the Bible is doubtful. The quote "or its original ending has been lost" proves that what we call today "Gospels" were not written by their original authors such as Mark, John, Matthew, etc... It proves that the Gospel had been tampered with by man. Let alone considering it as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.
If John Mark wasn't the one who wrote Mark 16:9-20, then who did? And how can you prove the ownership of the other person? Let alone proving that it was GOD Almighty's Revelation. And as we saw in the first quote above, we don't even know that John Mark was indeed the one who wrote the so called "Gospel of Mark".
To say the least in our case here, we now have enough evidence to discard the entire Gospel of Mark from the Bible, because you can't take bits and pieces of it and say some of it belongs to him and some of it doesn't! Let alone considering the entire corrupted Gospel as the True Living Word of GOD Almighty, which is a complete blasphemy.
Please visit A dangerous forgery was inserted at the end of the so-called "Gospel of Mark".
Here is an email that I received from a Christian
regarding Mark 16:17-18.
Emphasis below are mine:
From: R.Mercer
To: Osama Abdallah
Subject: I Totally Agree
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:41:57 -0700
"What credibility does Christianity have when it
scriptures are littered
with such dangerous and obvious forgeries?"
You summed it up very well on your web page. That is my
question
entirely. Just what are we to believe? If forgeries have been proven to
exist in the Bible, then how many more must there be? What about
the
chapters and verses we all guide our whole life/styles by? Are they
forgeries, too?
This verse in Mark 16:17-18, has always bothered me. I have, and
still do believe the rest of that passage (laying on of hands, healing
the sick,...), so how can that part of the passage be true when the
serpent part is forged?
I know the part on drinking any poison says "IF", but the part on
taking up serpents says "SHALL", which has always been a problem for me
to believe. Imagine us all being forced to take up serpents in order to
serve God.
On the other hand, if this was forged, then that creates an even
bigger concern for me. Not knowing what text in our Bible is authentic
and what is not.
Thanks for letting me take up so much of your time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). Like I said
before, this passage always bothered me, probably more so than any other.
Thanks, once again. Good Day.
|
Four false promises made by Jesus
regarding the Holy Spirit: 1- Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you. So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus? Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself? You had no need for this. Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you? Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie? The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol. Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...). Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan. Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus? Or were you someone's girlfriend? Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan? And why did you then keep your eyes?? Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?
Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11–13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.
Even the 12th disciple was chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots), - a game of chance, - and not by the Holy Spirit. Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell. Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD
sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
2- If a snake bites you and runs
its poison through your blood, it will not hurt you (Mark 16:17-18). Jesus even promised in the plural that you will be picking up deadly snakes and they will inject their poisons into you and you shall not be harmed!. This false prophesy is one of the NT's biggest lies, because it never happened. Not only that, but all Christians who genuinely attempted it in the past were killed by the snakes' poisons. Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7–10). There are many problems with this: 1- Paul is a single person. Jesus' bold promise was in the plural. "The believers shall pick up poisonous snakes, and if anyone gets bit by a poisonous snake and have the poison run through their blood, the poison shall not harm any believer!". Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison. 2- It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta. Some even look like Vipers. So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one: "Four species of snakes are present (in the wild) in the Maltese Islands of which three are relatively recent additions. The only indigenous snake is the Western Whip Snake Coluber viridiflavus which is a non-poisonous species. The other three, namely Algerian Whipsnake Coluber algirus, Leopard Snake Elaphe situla and Cat Snake Telescopus fallax have been introduced by man. Of these only the latter has some form of poison. Although snakes appear in the archaeological context (eg. the stone slab in Mus of Archaeology of Gozo - from ggantija, which has a snake on its side) this does not imply that they were poisonous. On the other hand, poisonous species such as Natrix natrix which occurs in nearby Sicily may have been eradicated by man through time." (Source) 3- Jesus' promise dismally fails, and it is one of the most embarrassing lies, and most dangerous to its followers, in the New Testament, which again and again proves that Jesus was indeed a GOD-sent
lying spirit as GOD Almighty deceived false people in the Old Testament.
John 3:13-14
2 Kings 2:11
Genesis 5:24
Again,
where did Enoch and Elijah go to?
Jesus' statement is simply
a lie. He didn't know that Elijah, Enoch and others (ex: Uzair or Ezra) were taken up to
Heaven by GOD Almighty. Was he also here a
fat drunk as the NT says he was? Jesus here added Elijah and Enoch to the 39+ list of barfinity (trinity), because we now have Elijah, Enoch and Jesus as their own trinity. Moses was scared to even pass the Judgment: 2- 3- 4-
The Romans had to
fake his crucifixion due
to Passover issues:
Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other
examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent
lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23. 3- You can
lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only
one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you. Not even Jesus,
with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle. 4- Jesus
promised the disciples that after he departs it will not be them
speaking. It will be the Holy Spirit will be speaking through their
mouths. Yet, after he departed, they split into Peter and Paul opposing
teams, and they started hurling insults and accusations towards each others'
teachings, and calling each others: Anathema (cursed by GOD in Greek), follower
of Satan, your Gospel is of the devil, you are a false apostle, you are dogs,
and several other serious accusations and insults. Where was the promised
Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above?? Where is Jesus' promise?? - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - 12th disciple was also chosen by
holy gambling.
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?
Remember: If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
The one unforgivable sin?! Jesus further says: The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10). But your entire package that is called the NT and church is the greatest insult and blasphemy against GOD Almighty's Holy Spirit. It is like a prostitute preaching, and while continuing to prostitute, that the one unforgivable sin is fornication. How many times did you fornicate and continue to fornicate? How many times did you lie on the Holy Spirit and continued to lie on the Holy Spirit of GOD Almighty? Were you also a fat drunk in this one?
Was Jesus drunk? High Concentrations and Intoxication:
The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus: John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a
fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:
winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol. Of course it never did! (See Holy Spirit of Islam, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: for he (John the Baptist) will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born. So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist. .Is John the Baptist another member of the barfinity? |
|
Satan was part of the trinity
(Ezekiel 28:13-19),
then got
subtracted
(-1):
GOD in the OT spoke a poem of regret [1] regarding Satan. GOD expresses how regretful He is that all of the Glory that He has created for and given to Satan will no longer be given to him. It was now given to a lesser second-hand, Jesus, whom otherwise would've received none of it. Jesus was GOD's plan B not A. 1. "You were perfect from the day you were created". Jesus was also created from the Word of GOD.2. Glorious. 3. "the chosen one". 4. The "Anointed". 5. ruler over earth. 6. Ruler over the "Holy Mount" of GOD.
Question to every polytheist trinitarian pagan: If Jesus replaced Satan, then: 1- How can Jesus be our Creator? 2- How can Satan be part of a trinity? 3- How can Jesus be given the glory that was created for and given to satan, not Jesus, and Jesus still be considered our Creator? 4- How come Satan was the primary and Jesus was secondary?
Of course, there is no Trinity, and Satan was not subtracted from any Trinity. The above exposes the lie of trinity; a word that does not even exist in any of the Jewish and Christian scriptures (Bibles and outside Bibles). Also, since we have
24 other thrones besides Jesus'
And Melchizedek was Jesus' Elder in Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20. Then, we also clearly have Satan as: 1- One of the elders and had his throne. 2- Satan too was Jesus' elder. 3- When compared to Melchizedek and Satan, Jesus was secondary.
Angels are scared of the mighty Satan: Even Michael, the chief angel, did not dare to insult the devil.
Using the polytheist trinitarian pagans' illogic, satan was indeed a Mighty Member of the Barfinity, but then got subtracted. And since satan was subtracted, then Jesus could've also gotten himself subtracted when satan made Jesus covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights. Do you see now how blasphemous and stupid Christianity is?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
|
The Book of 1 and 2 Peter:
"Some modern scholars on the basis of a number of features that they consider incompatible with Petrine authenticity, regard the letter as the work of a later Christian writer. Such features include the cultivated Greek in which it is written, difficult to attribute to a Galilean fisherman, together with its use of the Greek Septuagint translation when citing the Old Testament; the similarity in both thought and expression to the Pauline literature; and the allusions to widespread persecution of Christians, which did not occur until at least the reign of Domitian (A.D. 81-96). In this view the letter would date from the end of the first century or even the beginning of the second, when there is evidence for persecution of Christians in Asia Minor. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1348)"
"Nevertheless, acceptance of 2 Peter into the New Testament canon met with great resistance in the early church. The oldest certain reference to it comes from Origen in the early third century. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1354)"
"Among modern scholars there is wide agreement that 2 Peter is a pseudonymous work, i.e., one written by a later author who attributed it to Peter. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1354)"
So like the rest of the books and gospels of the Bible, we don't even know regarding 1 Peter:
The Book of Acts:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"
So based on some conclusion, you're willing to die for defending the idea that the Book of Acts was the True Word of GOD Almighty? If the book was inspired by GOD Almighty, then how come it wasn't mentioned in the book itself to help us filter it out from the many other "Satanic false books"? Are we sure that this book too is not a man-made Satanic book?
After all, its just a conclusion, isn't it?
Beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 80-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering it as the True Living Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Please visit:
None of Jesus' disciples witnessed the crucifixion. They "all fled" and "deserted" Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This further confirms Islam's claims.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
The Gospel of Luke:
"The identification of Luke as the author is primarily based on the "we" passages in Acts (beginning in Acts 16:10), which indicate that Luke was associated with Paul in his ministry and wrote down the account of his activities. (The Amplified Bible, Page 1153)"
The only proof that they have about Luke being the sole author of this gospel is a weak speculation on "we". This is absurd at best! This speculation shows:
It is also worth mentioning that the author of the book of Acts is also unknown as shown above:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"
So their whole speculation is absurd at best!
There is a serious forgery about Jesus' "resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't! Let us look at Luke 24:44-48 from the NIV Bible:
Luke 24
44 He said to them, "This is
what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is
written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms."
45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
46 He told them, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and
rise from the dead on the third day,
47 and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all
nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 You are witnesses of these things.
Luke 24:44-48 says that it is written in the Law of Moses (i.e., the Torah) that Jesus will die and resurrect on the third day. Where in the entire Old Testament (not just in the 5 books of Moses that make up the Law of Moses or the Torah) do you have that?! Show me one Old Testament verse that prophesized about Jesus' third day resurrection?
In fact, in my article Answering Isaiah 53, I clearly proved that the Old Testament actually confirms the Noble Quran's claims about Jesus never got crucified! Let alone dying and resurrecting on the third day!
Anyway, Let us see what the NIV Bible's theologians said about this book:
"The author's name does not appear in the book, but much unmistakable evidence points to Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1529)"
Again, we don't know for sure whether it was Luke or not who wrote the "Gospel of Luke" since his name doesn't appear in the Book. The Gospel itself seems to be a compromising one to the Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Let us look at the following:
"Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, (Luke 1:3)"
Few problems with this Gospel from the quote above:
1- The author was not inspired, and knew for sure that he was not inspired by GOD Almighty to write the Book since he didn't mention about any divine inspiration, and he said "...since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning..." Where do we see GOD's inspiration in this?
2- The author wrote it for the purpose of "his most excellent Theophilus." Since when we compromise GOD Almighty and document His Holy Words for the purpose of other higher (in rank) human beings?
I say it again, I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!
Also, beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering as the True Living Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Further from brother Vipor Poison; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:
Luke 1:3
Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the
beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most
excellent Theophilus,
The following is from the Catholic
Encyclopedia:
http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625b.htm
http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625a.htm
If Theophilus existed in either the 2nd or the 4th centuries then how could the writer of this gospel be the same Luke who is supposed to be with Jesus in the 1st century.
Maybe he lived to about 200 years.. :)
From brother Amir AbdulRahim; may Allah Almighty
always be pleased with him:
The subject of Mankind's Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have taken a closer look at this subject. Its seems it's not only your site that brings this subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.
For example, an article in the Catholic
Encyclopaedia that you mentioned in regard to the 'Theophilus' mentioned in
Luke's Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of The Bible? article)
testifies to this fact (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm):
"IV. TRANSMISSION OF THE TEXT
No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author-- all have been in some way altered. The material conditions under which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440), the little care of the copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different from the desire of accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find between various manuscripts of the same work. To these causes may be added, in regard to the Scriptures, exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies. To exempt the sacred writings from ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and it has not been the will of God to exercise this providence."
Lets just go through that again - "No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--all have been in some way altered." All have been in some way altered! In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any muslim, to follow an impure book?
When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur'an, there's no contest!
The Book of Hebrews:
"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1856)"
So because the guy was supposedly "well known (which we don't really know that for sure anyway)", then would that give us the right to consider his words as the Words of GOD Almighty?! I am sorry, but I don't really see the logic behind this! The Book of Hebrews is one of the highly used Books among Christians. I hear references from it a lot when listening to Christians preaching. Yet, no one really knows who wrote it!. This is quite ironic, because Christians use such highly doubtful books in their teachings as if they were the True Living Words of GOD Almighty. I don't care what you call this, but I call it blasphemy, because it is the most ridiculous insult to GOD Almighty and His Holy Words that I have ever seen.
I just hope you see the real cheap quality in the religion of Christianity, with all my respect due to every Christian reader.
Please visit:
None of Jesus' disciples witnessed the crucifixion. They "all fled" and "deserted" Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This further confirms Islam's claims.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
The Gospel of 1 John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"
"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
| 1 John and Galatians
forgeries:
From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm: 3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter: John
21:24-25
"We know that his testimony is true"?! Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person? Below in this article, we see:
The Gospel of 1 John: Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel: "....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)" "The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
1 John forgeries: 1 John forgeries by church fathers: The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=3480.msg16733#msg16733: By Mustafa Ahmad It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by Christians against Muslims fail! But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8) Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2:22)
1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 3rd century P46 . We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct evidence that Paul wrote it. 2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is the antichrist. This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 4th century GA 01, א - Codex Sinaiticus. We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct evidence that John wrote it. How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims don't even go back to the "alleged authors". |
1 John forgeries:
1 John forgeries by church fathers:
The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
| From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm:
Walid Shoebat said that Muslims deny the Father and Son, and the Bible in 1 John 2:22 states clearly that who ever denies that Jesus is the Christ is the liar: 1 John 2:18-27 2- The author himself (of 1 John) makes it clear that he's writing from his own head without Divine inspirations. Notice his wrong prediction about his followers living in the "last hour" and that the reason it is the last hour was because they've had an epidemic of anti-Christs coming and going during their time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). |
The Book of Revelation:
"The author of the book calls himself John, who because of his Christian faith has been exiled to the rocky island of Patmos, a Roman penal colony. Although he never claims to be John the apostle, he was so identified by several of the early church Fathers, including Justin, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Terullian, Cyprian, and Hippolytus. This identification, however, was denied by other Fathers, including Denis of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nazianzen, and John Chrysostom. Indeed, vocabulary, grammar, and style make it doubtful that the book could have been put into its present form by the same persons responsible for the fourth gospel. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1373)"
"Four times the author identifies himself as John (1:1,4,9; 22:8).....In the third century, however, an African bishop named Dionysius compared the language, style and thought of the Apocalypse (Revelation) with that of the other writings of John and decided that the book could not been written by the apostle of John. He suggested that the author was a certain John the Presbyter, whose name appears elsewhere in ancient writings. Although many today follow Dionysius in his view of authorship, the external evidence seems overwhelmingly supportive of the traditional view. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1922)"
Again, we don't know who wrote the Book of Revelation. It is certainly highly doubtful that it was written by Apostle John. The Theologians and Historians of the NIV Bible seem to agree with the invalidity of this book from the above quote. So are you now going to consider the other John's words as the Words and Inspirations of GOD Almighty?
As we see, the style of writing in the book of Revelation is different from the books that are believed to be from John which are the Gospel of John, 1 John, 2 John and 3 John. The book of Revelation's style seems to be closer to John the Presbyter's writings. This man is known in ancient writings. There are also many Christian theologians today that hold the same view about the falsety of the book of Revelation.
Isn't this sufficient enough to prove that the book is doubtful?
Notice that in the sections of "Gospel of John" and "Gospels of 1, 2 & 3 John" above, the author did not identify himself and it was ASSUMED without actual proofs that it was Saint John who wrote them. Notice how they said that if he were to identify himself, then it would be hard for them to explain it.
Now, notice the author in the Book of Revelation does identify himself as John, but he has a complete different language and style of writing from the other books, which created much uncertainty about its validity in the Church.
My questions here are: Who wrote the Books? And is or is not Saint John supposed to identify himself in his books? And where are his books that have his name on them?
Again, keep in mind that the NT was not even
documented on paper until 150 to 300 years after Jesus (depending on what
Christian you talk to). So the dating is way too long for us to be assuming
books to belong to certain people. Let alone considering their nonsense
(contents) as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.
Please visit: Jesus the "Alpha and Omega". Not only this quote doesn't prove Jesus as GOD, but it was also written in a book that is unreliable in later bibles. In the original Bibles, the quote doesn't even exist!!
Arche of the Creation of God as Alpha and Omega. The "Alpha and Omega" doesn't even exist in the original Bibles! It's a lie that was later inserted by trinitarians. See the historical proofs in the article. If their site is down, then you can read the article at this link ON MY SITE.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
The Book of Revelation is a very important, probably the most important
Book in the Bible today, because it has prophecies in it of what Christians
believe is for our future today, even though it has nothing to do with our
current world. It talks about Jesus soon (1800 to 2000 years ago) will return
(Revelation 22:7). I don't know how soon is 2000 years to the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). All the
people that this book was told to had died.
It also talks about the great battle of Gog
and Magog fighting the righteous; "and will go out to
deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth [The
earth DOES NOT have four corners and no the earth is not a square or rectangle.
It is round almost like an egg!!]--Gog and
Magog--to gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the
seashore. (From the NIV Bible, Revelation 20:8)"
The thing that we need to notice here beside the grave error about the shape of
the earth in this false book (sorry to say that), is that the Gog and Magog
existed before. Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal (Ezekiel 39:1), is
the name of the leader and Magog is the name of his nation (Ezekiel 38 and 39).
The Gog and Magog army had already been defeated and the Noble
Quran confirms their story. There had been historical discoveries that
perfectly match the Noble Quran's claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as
the discovery of the "Iron Gates", and other literature that mentions the Gog
and Magog army and location. There is even historical
documentation about them which matches the Noble Quran in London, England.
Please visit The story of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran and the Bible to see the references and proofs of these historical discoveries and several more.
The Bible says: The earth is flat! See all the verses in the Bible that claim the earth is flat.
It is a common Christian answer to say "We support Israel because it is God's promised land to the Jews, and He will prevail them against the army of Gog and Magog who seems to be mainly an Islamic army today." They mostly rely on the Book of Revelation from the Bible to support this claim.
The story of the Gog and Magog army attacking the Jews exists in both the Book of Ezekiel and the Book of Revelation in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). The Book of Ezekiel which came literally thousands of years before the Book of Revelation predicted the attack and defeat of the army of Gog and Magog.
The Noble Quran (The Muslims' Holy Scripture) talks about the army of Gog and Magog in details and explains the events that ALREADY took place. As I mentioned above, there had been historical discoveries that perfectly match the Noble Quran's claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as the discovery of the "Iron Gates", and other literature that mentions the Gog and Magog army and location.
Please visit The army of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran and the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
The lie (sorry to say that) of the Book of Revelation, however, also predicts the coming of the army of Gog and Magog. But as I said, the army of Gog and Magog were ALREADY predicted in the Bible thousands of years before the Book of Revelation.
So, the prediction in the Book of Revelation proves that the writer of the book, lacked a great deal of knowledge about history, because as I said, the event of the Gog and Magog battle (i.e., the battle of Armageddon) already happened!
The point is that the Book of Revelation, however, like most of the Bible today seems to be nothing but a big hoax (sorry to say that). It is very doubtful, but yet ironically, very important to the Christians of today.
Would you honestly deep inside yourself call nonsense of this kind the True Living Words of GOD Almighty, especially after knowing that very important early Christian resources thought "the book could not been written by the apostle of John"?
Please visit What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe in?
|
Oxymoron Trinity [1]: Jesus is the resurrection (John 11:25), but yet does not know when the Hour of the resurrection will come (Matthew 24:36) [1], and he had to cry, weep and beg GOD to resurrect Lazarus back to life. And this proves he is our Creator? And how is he exactly The Resurrection? Could Jesus and the disciples honestly even resurrect or create a fly on their own? This is one of the Glorious Quran's challenges to the polytheists from mankind who insist on deifying flesh and blood, dust and water, and idols. All are helpless. All are worthless when compared to Allah Almighty. In the OT, Elisha and many others also raised the dead: 2 Kings 4 Is Elisha and others like him now our Creator?
John 5:30 "I cannot do anything on my own." And Jesus could not determine who gets to sit on his right and on his left in Heaven. Only GOD alone decides this, Jesus said. Visit also:
Muslims honor the Virgin Birth: We Muslims believe in the virgin birth of Isa Al-Maseeh, from our mother Mariam, peace be upon them both. We also believe Isa performed many Miracles. In fact, it was the Christians who doubted the virgin birth. Islam came to cement it. But Isa (eesa) was nonetheless a creation of GOD Almighty, and a slave of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Even the Old Testament calls Jesus "Slave of GOD":
What is Islam?
Other: |
