What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog
False christs and prophets during and after Jesus:
The sections of this article are:
1- False messiahs (christs), prophets and
writings broke out shortly after Jesus.
2- Paul was a rodent from an infestation of rodents.
- Money was the main motive.
3- Further discussion and research.
1- False messiahs (christs), prophets and writings broke out shortly after Jesus:
The New Testament declares that false writers existed during the early days:
2 Corinthians 11:13:
13 For such are
false apostles,
deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
Christian scholar
Adam Clarke under his comments of this verse said:
"They falsely claimed to be the apostles of Christ while in fact they were not apostles. They use to deliver sermons and take pains in worship but they aimed at nothing but their personal interests."
1 John 4
1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of
God: because many false prophets
are gone out into the world.
Adam Clarke under his comments on this verse in volume 6 said:
“In the past every teacher used to claim that he received inspiration from the Holy Ghost, because every true prophet received inspiration. The word ‘spirit’ at this place signifies the man claiming that he was under the effect of the spirit. Put them therefore to test. Such preachers should be examined with argument. His phrase ‘many false prophets’ refers to those who were not inspired by the Holy Ghost especially from among the Jews.”
See also Acts 20:29-30, 2 Corinthians 11:13-15, 2 Corinthians 2:17, Galatians 1:6, 2 Peter 2:1, 1 John 4:1, 2 John 1:7, Jude 1:4, Titus 1:10-16.
Titus 1:10-16
10 For there are many unruly and vain talkers and
deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which
they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
12 One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the Cretians are alway
liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound
in the faith;
14 Not giving heed to
Jewish fables, and commandments of men,
that turn from the truth.
15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and
unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being
abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
Jewish fables and commandments of men? The Jewish law is filled with commandments and traditions that GOD Almighty supposedly revealed to Moses. Among those is the law of circumcision:
Leviticus 12:3
3 And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin
shall be circumcised.
Exodus 12:48
And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep
the passover to the Lord, let all his males be
circumcised, and then let
him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land:
for no uncircumcised person
shall eat thereof.
Notice how Paul called these commandments "Jewish fables, and commandments of men". Yet, they are supposed to be GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations to Moses. This is not about abrogation. This is clear denial of the truthfulness of the verses above, - that they are nothing more than man-made lies and fables. So here we have the following clash:
1- The Jewish Law contains fables and commandments of men.
2- The Jewish law contains lies on GOD Almighty.
3- The Jewish law is doubtful and corrupt.
4- Jesus lied when he said that he did not come to abolish the Jewish law, but to fulfill it. He obviously did not come to abolish the man-made lies and fables:
Matthew 5:17
The Fulfillment of the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to
abolish the Law or the
Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
5- In Paul's world Jesus was a liar. Also in Paul's world, the teachings of the disciples were false and bewitchment:
Galatians 3:1-2
Faith or Works of the Law
1 You foolish Galatians!
Who has bewitched you?
Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified.
2 I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by
the works of the
law, or by
believing what you heard?
For more, please visit: The disciples had conflicts with each other.
6- There is nothing called "Bible". It is not a Divine Book from GOD Almighty, since it is a book that is filled with lies and corruption, even according to itself.
Also visit: Paul's delusions. Ample passages that clearly prove that Paul was a charlatan and a liar. The New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful, and for pious believers to be considered disbelievers, and for disbelievers and hypocrites to be considered pious believers. This in itself is a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the infestation of existing false prophets and messiahs [1] at the time.
See also Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim about Christianity passed the test of time, and that the calendar that we use is based on Jesus' birth. But this exactly fulfills this prophecy. Time has changed and the Law has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become lawful and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25
25 He shall speak words against the Most High,
and shall wear out the saints of the Most High,
and shall think to
change the times and the law;
and they shall be given into his hand
for a time, times, and half a time.
See also the ample prophecies about the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even
mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls:
This Generation Prophecy:
Also, Jesus warned of many things to happen. Among them is the emerging of false messiahs and prophets who will deceive many. Jesus then concluded all of them by saying:
Matthew 24
11 And many false prophets shall rise, and
shall deceive many.
.......
24 For there shall arise false
Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew
great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive
the very elect.
.......
34 Verily I say unto you,
This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled.
From Gary DeMar:
(Emphasis below are mine, Osama Abdallah)
"Every time “this generation” (he genea haute) is used in the gospels, it refers to the generation of Jesus’ day: Matthew 11:16; 12:41, 45; 23:36; 24:34; Mark 8:12 (twice), 38; 13:30; Luke 7:31; 11:29, 30, 31, 32, 50, 51, 17:25; 21:32.
The use of the near demonstrative “this” forces the interpreter to understand Jesus to mean the generation to whom He was speaking. If Jesus had a future generation in view, He could have easily alleviated any confusion by using the far demonstrative “that” to distinguish His use of “this generation” in Matthew 24 (and Mark 13:30 and Luke 21:32) from every other time He used “this generation.”
Let me call in some experts on the subject to show that Tommy is far off base when it comes to his non-literal interpretation of “this generation” in the Olivet Discourse.
Tommy wrote that an “allegorical or non-literal interpretation imports an idea not found specifically in the text of a passage.” So how does Tommy change “this generation” into a future generation? He adds words to the text. In their book Charting the End Times, Tommy and co-author Tim LaHaye argue that Matthew 24:34 should read, “The generation that ‘sees’ these things will not pass till all is fulfilled.” 10 In order to get this meaning, “this” has to be replaced with “the” and four words have to be added to the verse: “The generation that sees these signs will not pass away. . . .” This is not the way to interpret the Bible. In addition, we are told in Matthew 24:33 who will see the signs: “even so you too, when you see all these things, recognize that He is near, right at the door.” The “you” is them not us." (Source)
Bibliography:
5- Robert G. Bratcher and Eugene A. Nida, A Translator’s
Handbook of the Gospel of Mark (New York: United Bible Societies, 1961), 419.
6- D.A. Carson, “Matthew”
in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, gen. ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, 12 vols.
(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1985), 8:507.
7- John Nolland The Gospel
of Matthew: A Commentary on the Greek Text (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005),
988–989.
8- William Sanford LaSor,
The Truth About Armageddon: What the Bible Says About the End Times (Grand
Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1987), 122.
9- Jack P. Lewis, The Gospel According to Matthew, Part 2; Living
Word Commentary: Sweet Publishing, 1976), 128.
10- Tim LaHaye and Thomas Ice, Charting the End Times: A Visual Guide to
Understanding Bible Prophecy (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2001), 36.
Source: https://americanvision.org/6071/clarifying-tommy-ices-clarifications/#.UArLdaDvb5k
Gary DeMar further says:
(Emphasis below are mine, Osama Abdallah)
"If “this generation” in Matthew 24:34 means what it means everywhere else in the gospels — the generation to whom Jesus was speaking — then the use of parousia by Jesus must refer to the period of that first-century generation. As to the timing of Jesus’ parousia, James wrote to his first-century audience that “the coming of the Lord is near” (James 5:8). The above lexicon referenced by Tommy states that the parousia of Jesus “nearly always” refers to “his Messianic Advent in glory to judge the world at the end of this age.” But this is what’s in dispute. When is the end of the age? The “ends of the ages” (1 Cor. 10:11), “these last days” (Heb. 1:1–2), and the “consummation of the ages” (Heb. 9:26) are references to the generation of the apostles, not a distant end-time age.
Contrary to what the “The leading Greek Lexicon of our day says,” the parousia of Jesus in Matthew 24 is not linked to the judgment of “the world.” It’s about the judgment of the temple (24:1–2) and Judea (24:15–20). Notice what Matthew 24:15 states: “When YOU see the abomination of desolation.” Throughout the discourse, Jesus continually uses the second person plural. Consider what He says in verse 33: “so, YOU too, when YOU see all these things, recognize that He is NEAR, right at the door.” It was that audience that would “see all these things.” This confirms the statement by James that “the coming of the Lord is near” (5:8). “Near” is defined by Jesus as “right at the door” to that first-century generation.
Those in Judea could escape the coming judgment by fleeing to the mountains (Matt. 24:16). Jesus was not describing a world-wide conflagration but one that could be easily escaped on foot. While I’m certainly not in the same league of those who wrote the “leading Greek Lexicon of our day” (and neither is Tommy), their comment that parousia “nearly always” refers to a yet future “Messianic Advent in glory” where Jesus will “judge the world at the end of this age” is interpretive overreaching.
There is no doubt that parousia means “presence.” In fact, I have a list of more than 50 authorities that confirm that parousia means “presence,” so this is not in dispute. The more significant question is to what event does the use of parousia in the Olivet Discourse refer, and what is the nature of Jesus’ “presence”? Milton Terry’s comments make it clear that the context and timing are very specific:
Whatever the real nature of the parousia, as contemplated in this prophetic discourse, our Lord unmistakably associates it with the destruction of the temple and city, which he represents as the signal termination of the pre-Messianic age. 2
Terry is an important authority on interpretive issues since dispensationalists give his book Biblical Hermeneutics high praise. Like Tommy Ice, Milton Terry describes his interpretive methodology as “grammatico-historical” 3 Confirming what he wrote in Biblical Apocalyptics on the timing of the events in the Olivet Discourse, Terry asks, “On what valid hermeneutical principles, then, can it be fairly claimed that this discourse of Jesus comprehends futurity? Why should we look for the revelations of far distant ages and millenniums of human history in a prophecy expressly limited to the generation in which it was uttered?” 4 " (Source)
Bibliography:
2- Milton
Terry, Biblical Apocalyptics: A Study of the Most Notable Revelations of God and
of Christ in the Canonical Scriptures (New York: Eaton & Mains, 1898), 246–247.
3- Milton Terry, Biblical Hermeneutics: A Treatise on the Interpretation
of the Old and New Testaments (New York: Phillips & Hunt, 1883.), 205.
4- Terry, Biblical Hermeneutics, 443.
Source: https://americanvision.org/6133/jesus-and-the-parousia/#.UA6VhaDvb5k
Gary DeMar further says:
(Emphasis below are mine, Osama Abdallah)
"Second, the audience reference is contemporary with Jesus: “Then if anyone says to YOU, ‘Behold, here is the Christ,’ or ‘There He is,’ do not believe [πιστεύσητε: 2nd person plural] him” (Matt. 24:23). Why would Jesus warn His disciples about false Christs if there wouldn’t be any false Christs in their day?
Third, there is no “scholarly consensus” that there were no false Christs until around A.D. 130. Hebrew and Rabbinic scholar John Lightfoot (1602–1675) wrote:
“False Christs broke out, and appeared in public with their witchcrafts, so much the frequenter and more impudent, as the city and people drew nearer to its ruin; because the people believed the [Messiah] should be manifested before the destruction of the city; and each of them pretended to be the [Messiah] by these signs.” 2
Grant R. Osbourne writes that [t]hese pretenders appeared often in the first century and throughout the history of the church. . . .” (Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament: Matthew (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2010), 887.)) R. T. France also argues that there were false Christs leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem that took place in A.D. 70:
“The catastrophic situation in Jerusalem during those last days before its capture will provide a fertile breeding-ground for the sort of messianic claimants already predicted in vv. 5 and 11 as part of the more general upheaval of the period before the siege. Anyone who offered new hope of divine intervention would be eagerly listened to, and the more so if they were able to offer ‘signs and wonders’ to support their claim. And such miraculous proofs were, according to Josephus, offered by several of the nationalist leaders he mentions: he cites specifically the parting of the Jordan (Ant. 20.97), the collapse of the city walls (Ant. 20:170), the uncovering of Moses’ sacred vessels (Ant. 18:85), as well as more generally ‘conspicuous wonders and signs’ (Ant. 20:168) and God-given ‘signs of freedom’ (War 2:2.259).” (R. T. France, The Gospel of Matthew: The New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007), 916–917).))
In a footnote, France writes, “Such ‘false Messiahs and false prophets’ active during the siege might include Simon bar-Giora (Josephus, War 4:503-44 etc.), who was regarded as a ‘king’ (510) . . . and also ‘many’ false prophets noted anonymously in War 6.285-88; that last passage goes on to relate (6.289–300) a series of signs and wonders occurring in the period before the city was destroyed, which some took (wrongly) to be omens of deliverance.” 3
There were so many impostors preying on the gullibility of the people that under the procuratorship of Felix (Acts 23:24), “many of them were apprehended and killed every day. They seduced great numbers of the people still expecting the Messiah; and well therefore might our Saviour caution his disciples against them.” 4
Fourth, Dispensationalist Larry Spargimino states that “false messiahs were not limited to the first century.” 5 This means, according to him, there were false messiahs in the first century. What’s interesting about Spargimino’s comment is that it appears in a book edited by Tommy Ice.
Fifth, James B. Jordan writes:
“There is plenty of evidence in the Scriptures . . . that there was a group of Christian leaders who claimed to have the anointing (messiah) of apostles, who claimed to be prophets and teachers, and who did indeed mislead many believers. They were a constant danger in the apostolic era, and a great deal of Paul’s writings in particular deal with their deceptions. We are thinking, of course, of the Judaizers.
“The Judaizers were the heirs of the tradition-serving Jewish teachers who were Jesus’ worst enemy. The Judaizers are the constant enemy in Acts and the epistles. They are the anti-christs of the Johannine letters, who claimed to have been sent out by the apostles but who were not “of us” (1 John 2:18-19; 4:1). 6 They are the main enemy in the book of Revelation.
“The Judaizers fit perfectly Jesus’ predictions. They claimed to come in His name. They misled many. They claimed an anointing, but it was false. They were false prophets.”
To bring all of this to a conclusion, Tommy Ice is mistaken in his claim that “there is scholarly consensus that there were not false Christs or Messiahs until around A.D. 130.”" (Source)
|
Holy Spirit or Rolling the Dice? When it came to collecting money, the Holy Spirit was all over the place (Acts 5). But when it came to selecting the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias via a game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy Spirit was supposedly there from the first place. So why couldn't It just speak Matthias' name and be done with it? Why the game of chance at all? We read:
Matthew 10:20
Mark 13:11
VS.
Acts 1 They rolled the dice while dismally failing to just speak Matthias' name. And we're talking about choosing the Prince of the 12th Divine Throne? As if that is not important enough for the Holy Spirit? The New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful, and for pious believers to be considered disbelievers, and for disbelievers and hypocrites to be considered pious believers. This in itself is a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the infestation of existing false prophets and messiahs [1] at the time. See also Daniel 7:25 prophecy about the false king will change time and the Law. Christians often use the shallow claim about Christianity passed the test of time, and that the calendar that we use is based on Jesus' birth. But this exactly fulfills this prophecy. Time has changed and the Law has been thoroughly violated. The false tongue of problematic hyperboles has caused for the forbidden to become lawful and for the lawful to become forbidden:
Daniel 7:25 See also the ample prophecies about
the new covenant and new Servant
will come from the
desert
of Kedar and Teman in Arabia [2].
Prophet Muhammad was even
mentioned by the name in the found Dead
Sea scrolls: Promised a lie? 1- Why couldn't the Holy Spirit say GOD Almighty Chose Matthias? Were they not filled with the Holy Spirit:
Mark 13:11
Matthew 10:20
Acts 13:52
Acts 2:4
Acts 4:31
2- Why did they have to roll the dice (cast lot) to randomly select Matthias? "Is casting lots gambling? Casting lots or Drawing of lots may refer to: Cleromancy, a form of divination. Lottery, a form of gambling that involves the drawing of numbers for a prize. Sortition, the practice of randomly selecting political officials from a larger pool of candidates." (Source, 2) 3- Isn't this also a form of promoting and/or legitimizing gambling and sorcery and future telling through rolling the dice nonsense, since in the Bible the roll of dice was not only legitimate, but it determined the 12th disciples to replace Judas! 4- So any delusional fool out there could pray in the Name of the Lord and cast lots and whatever the result is is from GOD Almighty?? 5- And who will sit at the Throne in the End? Matthias or Judas? Also visit:
When it came to Collecting Money, the Holy Spirit was all over the place. You'll need to read Acts, chapters 3 thru 6. But here is an example:
Acts 5 So here we have a man who sold a piece of his property and donated some of it for the cause of GOD Almighty. What was the answer to his charitable deed? His heart is filled with satan because he didn't give all of the money of the property's sale. So obviously, all of the Christians today, world-wide without any exception, are liars whose hearts are filled with satan, because they all have possessions and properties that they hold on to. Look at the irony here: When it came to collecting money, the Holy Spirit was all over the place. But when it came to selecting the 12th disciple, they had to roll the dice to pick Matthias by a game of chance. And they lied on GOD Almighty and said that the result of the casting of the lots was from GOD Almighty. But the Holy Spirit was SUPPOSEDLY THERE from the first place! So why couldn't It just speak Matthias' name and be done with it?? The reason this didn't happen is: 1- Because they didn't have the Holy Spirit. 2- They couldn't agree on which candidate to choose as the twelfth disciple, because their heads were empty and were never filled with the Holy Spirit. 3- GOD Almighty would NEVER speak through rolling dice garbage, because it would only add more suspicion and confusion. It undercuts the credibility of the disciples. 4- The authors of the Bible have lied on Jesus and his disciples and their history. Even the Bible's own theologians and historians admit that the Bible's books and gospels:
(a)- Were written by
unknown people. I've provided ample quotes on almost every single gospel and book at: www.answering-christianity.com/authors_gospels.htm.
Allah Almighty Said in the Noble Quran: "Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:79)"
www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm
All Thanks, Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty for
the Favor of Islam, I don't have to believe in hoaxes! The
Glorious Quran is thoroughly proven to be a Divine Miracle from
Allah Almighty. See the Glorious Quran's:
Hoaxes written? The above clearly demonstrates that there was no Holy Spirit inspiring the characters mentioned in the Bible's New Testament. I am not saying all of the NT is false, but most certainly much much of it is fabricated hoaxes. The most offensive one of them is the fact that they had to resort to rolling the dice to choose a disciples? And the result from the dice roll was from GOD?? This is no less than a blasphemy and an insult on:
1- GOD Almighty. Why even need to roll the dice (cast lot) when you are SUPPOSEDLY filled with the Holy Spirit?? After all, was it a Spirit or a spit that they were filled with? And was it GOD Almighty that made the descision or the random chance of casting lots?
Quran Miracle:
The Jews' and Christians' scribes changed and
still change
the Words.
Proven with images, text and
videos from their corrupt
bible and books! See
how they removed words and
altered words. Some important questions to consider:
So what do you think?
John 16 So why couldn't Jesus here just SPEAK Matthias' name to be the 12th disciple? Why the use of the game of chance? Does it not render him useless and pointless when using it to determine who will be the winner (12th disciple)? The point of Jesus' promise of speaking clearly and plainly and directly without riddles or examples to his disciples was to prevent any and all confusion. Yet, we see here a silly game of chance determining a very important issue in Christianity! The determination of the 12th disciple should not be done by: 1- Voting among the disciples. 2- Or playing a game of chance among the disciples. This is a thing that GOD Almighty supposedly has to decide for Himself. After all this is disciple that WILL SIT AT THE THRONE OF GOD ALMIGHTY TO JUDGE THE ISRAELITES. So no game of chance should be allowed. Why use it when they supposedly had the Holy Spirit speaking clearly and plainly and directly to them? Doesn't this look like a fabricated lie on GOD Almighty to you?? It sure stinks like a rotten dead flesh to me!
Some might answer the above objections by saying that yes GOD Almighty chose the game of chance to determine the 12th disciple, and the proof for this is the fact that the disciples were all or most martyred in the cause of spreading Christianity. So therefore, since they died for what they believed in, then they certainly have died for something they very strongly believed was the Truth. And since they all or many of them did it, then this could not have been a fabricated lie. Response: 1- There is not one confirmed fact that any of the disciples was martyred for his belief. All of these claims of martyrdoms were written by Church fathers in the 3rd and 4th century. That's at least 200 years after Jesus' departure. "Summary: The Bible only mentions the deaths of two apostles, James who was put to death by Herod Agrippa I in 44 AD and Judas Iscariot who committed suicide shortly after the death of Christ. The details of the deaths of three of the apostles (John, the Beloved, Bartholomew and Simon the Canaanite) are not known at all, either by tradition or early historians. The deaths of the other seven apostles are known by tradition or the writings of early Christian historians. According to traditions and the Bible, eight of the Apostles died as Martyrs. At least two of the Apostles, Peter and Andrew were crucified." (Source)
2- The Bible declares that Jesus never died:
It is worth noting that the
Bible's Old and New Testaments both declare that Jesus never died.
The following was taken from:
What is the best way to convert a non-Muslim to Islam?:
3- Not only that, but Israel has faced a major wholesale slaughter by Titus and his army in year 70 AD. So many had died just for being Jews. And all of the disciples of Jesus were Jewish. And certainly many martyrdom stories were written in Israel and abroad. Every hero had to be martyred to further legitimize the cause. And so therefore, many fabricated stories were invented regarding the disciples to raise their heroism. Not only that, but all of the Bible's accounts are highly doubtful. The Bible's own theologians thoroughly admit this in all of the Bibles' commentaries: So now based on what objective grounds should we reject the claim about the Bible's New Testament's accounts being mostly false and fabricated by men?
4- Islam's Divine Miracles:
Take care, |
2- Paul was a rodent from an infestation of rodents:
Again, please visit: Paul's delusions. Ample passages that clearly prove that Paul was a charlatan and a liar. Paul, who was also a Jew and he never even met Jesus in person, was another rodent from an infestation of rodents. The plague of tens (10s) of false messiahs and prophets that struck the society at the time caused for the likes of Paul to emerge and thrive. And money was the main motive:
Acts 4
34 and no one went in need of anything. Everyone
who owned land or houses would sell them and
bring the
money
35
to the apostles.
Then they would give the money to anyone who needed it.
Like the saying goes:
"You are a product of your environment"
Also Visit:
(Tons of verses and articles exposing him)
|
From
https://www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_problematic_hyperboles.htm: .......... Infestation: Again, the New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful. This in itself is a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the infestation of existing false prophets and messiahs [1] at the time. The analysis below clearly show that the false "Jesus" of the full-of-fabrications, the corrupt Bible, is not what Isa (eesa), the true Messiah and the son of our virgin mother Mary, is. Peace and blessings be upon Isa and his mother. We believe in the virgin birth of the Messiah, and we believe he will return to fight the armies of satan. Both the Bible and Islam agree that he will return as an Arab [2] from Damascus, Syria.
Baptist called Jesus a liar! The infestation gets even more ridiculous when we read from the NT that John the Baptist, the supposed great Prophet, called Jesus a liar before he died: Yes, John the Baptist died disbelieving in Jesus. |
|
The
infestation of the Pauls:
Paul was certainly a product of the plenty of false liars that were roaming around:
Islam is GOD Almighty's Divine Truth. To be 100% sure about this, visit: |
3- Further discussion and research:
This topic is further discussed on this website's blog in great details at:
Also, please visit the following articles for
ample more elaborations on
the above article:
https://americanvision.org/6071/clarifying-tommy-ices-clarifications/#.UArLdaDvb5k
(Part 1)
https://americanvision.org/6133/jesus-and-the-parousia/#.UA6VhaDvb5k (Part
2)
https://americanvision.org/6138/false-christs-clarifying-tommy-ices-clarifications/
(Part 3)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/christiancrier/2015/07/16/7-bible-verses-about-false-prophets/
http://www.bibleinfo.com/en/questions/how-can-one-recognize-false-christ
Just who were the authors of the Bible?
Paul's delusions. Ample passages that clearly prove that Paul was a charlatan and a liar.
The Bible's contradictions and history of corruption.
Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible.
Muhammad was prophesized in the Bible.
Corruption in the Old Testament.
What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe are closes to the Truth?
Crucifixion of Jesus is a lie according to several of the Disciples' early writings.
History of Man's corruption of the Bible.
The New Testament was not even written by its original authors.
The "God" title in Isaiah 9:6 was given to others before and after Jesus.
The early Christians rejected Trinity and never believed in it.
Contradictions in the resurrection story in the Bible.
Was Jesus crucified on
a tree (according to Peter), cross (according to others), or never got crucified
(according to Islam)?
We only believe in Jesus'
personal quotes as closest to the truth.
Jesus according to Islam
never got killed on the cross. Allah Almighty saved him.
Does Psalm 16:8-11 refer to Jesus' resurrection as the book of Acts suggest?
Jesus was never crucified according to the Gospel of Barnabas.
Isaiah 42-54 seem to predict Islam and the removal of GOD Almighty's Covenant from the people of Israel.
Deconstructing Isaiah 53 & the crucifixion/resurrection of Jesus - Exposing Paul's inventions.
Did Isaiah 53 really prophesies about the crucifixion of Jesus? It supports Islam's claims about Jesus peace be upon him never died on the cross. I also addressed John 19:36-37 from the Bible and proved that Jesus never got crucified, since GOD Almighty promised that he will protect Jesus' body and not let even a single bone be broken. My question to all Christians is: How in the world is it possible for the feet to get nailed on the cross without any penetration to the bones by the nails, hence breaking part of the feet's bones?! I also added refutations to Exodus 12:46, Numbers 9:12, Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 34:20, which supposedly prove the Christians' belief about Jesus crucifixion. I proved that this dogma has no truth what so ever and exposed the wrong Trinitarian English translation of Zechariah 12:10. I also showed in Isaiah 52:13 "...he will be raised and lifted up....", which clearly and perfectly agrees with Islam about Jesus never died on the cross. "Raised and lifted" suggests that Jesus will be picked up right from the cross, or saved right from the cross by Allah Almighty. It suggests that Jesus will not die, nor get crucified, but rather be raised and lifted by GOD Almighty to Heavens.
