Further Topic Research:
Syntax help

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube

Introduction: We must first of all know that the entire Bible is corrupted and unreliable and is mostly filled with man-made laws and corruption!  GOD Almighty Said: "`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

See Also Deuteronomy 31:25-29 where Moses peace be upon him predicted the corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his death.

The Book of Moses predicted that the Law (Bible) will get corrupted.  The Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after did indeed confirm this corruption.


How can you say that the Bible has corruption in it when Saint Paul in 2 Timothy 3:16 clearly said that "All Scripture is God-breathed"?

Let us look the following Verse: "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, (From the NIV Bible, 2 Timothy 3:16)"

In the above verse, we clearly see that the entire Bible is supposed to be inspired from GOD Almighty.

There are few problems however with this claim:

1- There is no actual "Bible". The word "Bible" doesn't even exist in what we call today "The Bible". So when such claim is made, it is not right for us to use it to prove the entire "collection" was inpired from GOD Almighty.

2- Paul obviously didn't know much about the Old Testament for claiming that it is all "God-breathed".  GOD Almighty said: "`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"   See Also Deuteronomy 31:25-29 where  Prophet Moses peace be upon him predicted the corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his death by their own hands.  See History of Man's corruption of the Old Testament.

3- Paul who spoke 2 Timothy 3:16 had rediculously contradicted himself, because he himself admitted before that he wasn't always inspired by GOD Almighty himself (1 Corinthians 7:25-35). Verses 1 Corinthians 7:25-35 are today permanantly preserved in the "Bible". If GOD Almighty indeed spoke 2 Timothy 3:16 through Paul, then He wouldn't have contradicted Himself in the Verse about the entire Bible being His Words, while permanatly preserving Paul's personal words and suggestions in the "Bible". This should be one solid proof that Paul was not truthful.  Anyway, many famous Historians and Theologians before came to conclusions that Paul was not truthful.

See also Are these Paul's words or GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations????  More examples of Paul's contradictions and lies.

4- Most of the New Testament is nothing but conversations between people, which are clearly not inspirations from GOD Almighty. For instance, Paul fought with Saint Peter and accused him of being "clearly in the wrong" (Galatians: 2:11-12), and had a huge argument with Saint Barnabas (Acts 15:36-39). Now one must ask, did GOD for instance favor Paul over Barnabas and Peter and inspired him the words while he was fighting with them? If so, since Peter was "clearly in the wrong", then how about his Gospels? Wasn't every word that Peter spoke supposedly inpired by GOD? How then could he be "clearly in the wrong"? One of them must be in the wrong, which in either case, would also produce another contradiction to 2 Timothy 3:16. Is Paul GOD Himself? No Christian believes in that. So why then take everything he says including 2 Timothy 3:16 as the Words of GOD Almighty when they contain clear contradictions in them?

See also: Paul Versus the Disciples.

5- The history of the Gospels in the New Testament is very unreliable according to the commentary of the NIV Bible. The NIV Bible is one of the most used Bibles among Christians, and is used in almost every "Bible Search" web site. I wrote down their quotes in DARK GREEN to prove this point. Let me show you a little example of that article:


The Book of Acts:

"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke."

So based on some conclusion, you're willing to die for defending the idea that the Book of Acts was the True Word of GOD Almighty? If the book was inspired by GOD Almighty, then how come it wasn't mentioned in the book itself to help us filter it out from the many other "Satanic false books"? Are we sure that this book too is not a man-made Satanic book?

After all, its just a conclusion, isn't it?


The Book of Hebrews:

"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients."

So because the guy was supposedly "well known (which we don't really know that for sure anyway)", then would that give us the right to consider his words as the Words of GOD Almighty?!  I am sorry, but I don't really see the logic behind this!  The Book of Hebrews is one of the highly used Books among Christians.  I hear references from it a lot when listening to Christians preaching.   Yet, no one really knows who wrote it!.  This is quite ironic, because Christians use such highly doubtful books in their teachings as if they were the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.  I don't care what you call this, but I call it blasphemy, because it is the most rediculous insult to GOD Almighty and His Holy Words that I have ever seen.

I just hope you see the real cheap quality in the religion of Christianity, with all my respect due to every Christian reader.

This article Just who were the real authors of the Bible exposes the historical inreliability of the Gospels of the Bible, which is extremely important when trying to claim that a discovered Letter/Book was indeed a "Gospel" and it is the Words of GOD Almighty.

Allah Almighty said in the Noble Quran (The Muslims' Holy Scripture): "Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal? And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book, but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. Then woe to those who write the Book [The Bible] with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' To traffic with it for a miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:77-79)"

5- "The X-Rated Pornography in the Bible is another proof that the Bible can not be all inpired by Allah Almighty.


Do you believe that the "Bible" contains some Divine Inspirations in it?

Yes I do. Man can try to come up with many lies and additions to the Words of Allah Almighty, but Allah Almighty's Words will always stand out clear from corruption. As a Muslim, I believe that Jesus' personal quotes are the closest to the Truth.  But however, the Noble Quran is the error-free Holy Book that we all must follow. Allah Almighty said in the Noble Quran: "We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly Guard it (from corruption). (The Noble Quran, 15:9)" Also "Nay, this is a Glorious Quran, (inscribed) in a Tablet Preserved! (The Noble Quran, (85:21-22)"

Again, please visit: Are these Paul's words or GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations????


Further sites to research:

Answering Trinity.  This section is a library that has many articles that refute Trinity, and shows in much great details the history of man's corruption in the Bible.

Famous Theologians and Historians believe that Paul was not truthful.

Just who were the real authors of the Bible?

Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture.

Why do Muslims believe in Jesus' personal quotes only as closest to the Truth in the Bible.

History of Man's corruption of the Old Testament.

Send your comments.

Back to Main Page.


What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube