Answering Christianity Research Center

By the way, how did you access to Medscape.com? It asked me about personal information and other things.

Regarding genetic engineering, this technology is widely concerned by critics.

They could eliminate diseases for for human embryos, but critics said it is not good idea.
 
Critics said ---
 One major concern is safety to a developing embryo — whether genetically modified human embryos would indeed produce healthy babies. But on a broader level, any changes made in the DNA of an embryo would be passed down for generations. That raises fears that any mistakes in the editing that inadvertently caused new diseases could become a permanent part of that family's genetic blueprint.

 Darnovsky and others also worry that modifying human DNA in an embryo could give rise to "designer babies." That's when parents pick and choose the traits of their children to try to make them smarter, taller, stronger or have other traits that make them seem superior. That's not yet technically possible. But critics fear scientists are already moving in that direction.

 The scenario is that you would have fertility clinics advertising to people who wanted to engineer their future children so that they could be presented as 'enhanced' — as biologically better than everyone else," Darnovsky says. "It's not a world we want to build. It's not a world we want to live in."
----------
 "If irresponsible scientists are not stopped, the world may soon be presented with a fait accompli of the first [genetically modified] baby," says David King, who heads the U.K-based group Human Genetics Alert. "We call on governments and international organizations to wake up and pass an immediate global ban on creating cloned or GM babies, before it is too late."

 Amato and others stress that their work is aimed at preventing terrible diseases, not creating genetically enhanced people. And they note that much more research is needed to confirm the technique is safe and effective before anyone tries to make a baby this way.

 But scientists hoping to continue the work in the U.S. face many regulatory obstacles. The National Institutes of Health will not fund any research involving human embryos (the new work was funded by Oregon Health & Science University). And the Food and Drug Administration is prohibited by Congress from considering any experiments that involve genetically modified human embryos.

 Nevertheless, the researchers say they're hopeful about continuing the work, perhaps in Britain. The United Kingdom has permitted genetic experiments involving human embryos forbidden in the United States.

--------------

Brother, these researches were protested not because of anti-gay, but scientific concerns about human embryos.

Therefore, it doesn't really support your claim.

I have genetic diseases, but genetic engineering is probably a bad idea. Who knows. Maybe my body would develop me abnormally.

The reason i mentioned MRSA is because it is quite abundant within the homosexual and LGBT community,

And no I do think that it can be fixed if researchee but LGBT doesnt let anyone research that you know? When those protests are held when a investigation is labelled anti-gay?

1. "Quite abundant"?
Again, you must provide me a medical evidence for supporting your statement. 

2. Give me a reliable source for genetic engineer. I'm not sure if you are making fabricationg or not.

Anyone can get MRSA on their body from contact with an infected wound or by sharing personal items, such as towels or razors, that have touched infected skin. MRSA infection risk can be increased when a person is in activities or places that involve crowding, skin-to-skin contact, and shared equipment or supplies"
General Information | MRSA | CDC
https://www.cdc.gov › mrsa › community

And No,by Influence I dont mean sex

And those genetic disorders can be fixed by genetic engineering,rather than that, they choose to dress up,act and engage in sexual activity wwith the same gender until they get a gender change surgery?

Yes,but adoption isnt always the wiser method,for multiple reason
Influence,STDs can affect them,MRSA,etc can be passed down to them by even hugging their own parents.

It doesn't make sense. If a child hugging a gay parent, the child would get a risk of disease? Really?

Besides, homosexual parents cannot have sex with children under federal law, specifically child sex abuse. So, I don't hear a lot of cases that children getting diseases from homosexual parents, unless you give me a medical evidence.

Regarding transgender, I read several articles about transgenders in Pakistan about their experiences. Honestly, these transgenders men feel uncomfortable talking with men. It is possible that a human transgender has genetic disorder that causes to change gender.

Zakir is not available. He's gone.

I thought fool is an offensive term, according to Jesus said.

http://www.answering-christianity.com/pauls_blasphemy_against_god.htm

MuslimDue, I think he stopped responding after AhmadFarooq destroyed him.