What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog
christians LIES Regarding the
(He is a new convert to Islam)
1) Some basic information regarding
2) Pagan trintarian christian lies regarding the
Spanish Jesuit José O'Callaghan has argued that one fragment (7Q5) is a New Testament text from the Gospel of Mark, chapter 6, verses 52–53. In recent years this controversial assertion has been taken up again by German scholar Carsten Peter Thiede. A successful identification of this fragment as a passage from Mark would make it the earliest extant New Testament document, dating somewhere between AD 30 and 60. Opponents consider that the fragment is tiny and requires so much reconstruction (the only complete word in Greek is "και" = "and") that it could have come from a text other than Mark.”
Notice the lies of these pagan trintarian christian apologists such as José O’Callaghan and Carsten Peter Thiede. They have NOTHING to back their claims up with. There is NO WAY for them to connect the Dead Sea Scrolls to their Corrupted New Testament. The fragment called (7Q5) is TINY and requires TONS of reconstruction. It evens tells us that the ONLY word in Greek is the Greek word for “and”. That COULD have come from ALMOST ANYTHING!
3) More LIES about the
Here’s some great information; “Fundamentalists often look to the Dead Sea Scrolls to confirm the accuracy of the Bible. You hear an awful lot about how the Dead Sea Scrolls confirmed the book of Isaiah.
The accuracy of the book of
Isaiah makes for an impressive argument for "passing the text without
error." However, Biblicists have diligently ignored the findings in
In some cases (significantly in 1-2 Samuel, Jeremiah, and Exodus), the fragments show a recession of biblical books that are different from the Masoretic tradition. They found a shorter form of Jeremiah in Hebrew, only known before in the Greek version in the Septuagint. It has becomes clear to Biblical scholars studying the Dead Sea Scrolls that most of the Masoretic tradition is a Palestinian rewording of the book.
Another fragment found at
Biblical inerrantists go out
of their way to ignore the differences that true Biblical scholars have
Scholars knew before the
Apologists and biblical
inerrantists explained away variations to errors in translation for many years.
The discovery of
Here is some more great information;
“From: David Rice <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: <Surgediver@aol.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 11:28:58 -0700 Subject: Mocking BirdGod Now
> The dead sea scrolls that have in them the original
> are exactly the same then as they are now.
The writings in "
1-2 Samuel, Jeremiah, and Exodus are VASTLY different in the DSS than in the Bible. There are over 30 chances in Jeremiah alone. Entire pages worth of text is missing in the Bible and found in the DSS, while entire pages of different text exist in the Bible but are missing in the DSS.
Bible scholars have known THIS FACT for 40 years, ever
since the Cave Four discoveries at
That Fundamentalist priests and cult leaders continue to tell their victims the LIE that the DSS "validates the Bible" is PROOF POSITIVE of their deceiving, demonic nature. The FACT is, the Bible as we have it today is VASTLY different than what the original authors wrote.
Anyone who claims otherwise is ignorant.
"Education is not filling a bucket but lighting a fire." --- W B Yeats”