What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube |
Is Jesus God Because He Said He Said He Was The Good Shepherd And Is Joseph of Arimathea God According to Jesus?
I would like to analyze two similar passages from the Gospels of Mark and Luke. As you can see from the passage a man came up to Jesus and called him good. Jesus is asking him why he is calling him good, only God alone is good.
The word good in the passages is agathos.
Agathos could mean....
1) of good constitution or nature
2) useful, salutary
3) good, pleasant, agreeable, joyful, happy
4) excellent, distinguished
5) upright, honourable
So according to Jesus only God could be agathos.
Have a look at the passages for your self......
17As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. "Good (agathos) teacher," he asked, "what must I do to inherit eternal life?" 18"Why do you call me good (agathos)?" Jesus answered. "No one is good (agathos)except God alone.
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/c/1138800574-2758.html#17 (for Mark 10:17)
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/c/1138800680-5422.html#18 (for Mark 10:18)
18A certain ruler asked him, "Good (agathos) teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?" 19"Why do you call me good (agathos)?" Jesus answered. "No one is good (agathos)except God alone.
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/c/1138801237-1224.html#18 (for Luke 18:18)
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/c/1138801260-1148.html#19 (for Luke 18:19)
Christians try to use this verse to show that Jesus is saying that he is God...
I am the good (kalos) shepherd. The good (kalos) shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.
Christians say that since only God alone is good and Jesus said he is good that means he claimed divinity. However, when we look at the Greek word for 'good' in this verse the word is not agathos, it is kalos.
1) beautiful, handsome, excellent, eminent, choice, surpassing, precious, useful, suitable, commendable, admirable
a) beautiful to look at, shapely, magnificent
b) good, excellent in its nature and characteristics, and therefore well adapted to its ends
1) genuine, approved
3) joined to names of men designated by their office, competent, able, such as one ought to be
4) praiseworthy, noble
c) beautiful by reason of purity of heart and life, and hence praiseworthy
1) morally good, noble
d) honourable, conferring honour
e) affecting the mind agreeably, comforting and confirming
Therefore this is not the same kind of 'good' that Jesus was referring to previously as can only be attributed to God alone.
So Jesus was not claiming divinity in John 10:11.
However, interestingly when we read the following verse.......
Now there was a man named Joseph, a member of the Council, a good (agathos) and upright man,
Here we have Joseph of Aramethia being referred to as an agathos man.
We saw previously that Jesus said that only God alone is agathos. So was Jesus' statement that God alone is agathos incorrect or is Joseph of Aramethia a divine man now?
Back to My Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.
Rebuttals by Bassam Zawadi.
Islam and the Noble Quran - Questions and Answers.
Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible.
Questions about Jesus that trinitarian Christians don't have logical answers for.
What parts of the Bible do Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") believe are closest to the Truth? and Why?
"Allah" was GOD Almighty's original Name in the Bible according to the Hebrew and Aramaic sources.
Scientific Miracles in Islam and the Noble Quran.
Most of the Bible's books and gospels were written by mysterious people!
Jesus mentioned Muhammad by the name in the Bible.
Did Isaiah 53 really prophesies about the crucifixion of Jesus? It supports Islam's claims about Jesus peace be upon him never died on the cross. I also addressed John 19:36-37 from the Bible and proved that Jesus never got crucified, since GOD Almighty promised that he will protect Jesus' body and not let even a single bone be broken. My question to all Christians is: How in the world is it possible for the feet to get nailed on the cross without any penetration to the bones by the nails, hence breaking part of the feet's bones?! I also added refutations to Exodus 12:46, Numbers 9:12, Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 34:20, which supposedly prove the Christians' belief about Jesus crucifixion. I proved that this dogma has no truth what so ever and exposed the wrong Trinitarian English translation of Zechariah 12:10.
Send your comments.
Back to Main Page.
What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube