What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube |
Biblical Contradiction: Is God's Law Perfect?
In the Old Testament we see that it says that the Law of the Lord is perfect...
The law of the LORD is perfect, reviving the soul. The statutes of the LORD are trustworthy, making wise the simple.
John Gill says...
All the scriptures of truth, which are profitable for doctrine; for setting doctrine in a clear light, and for the vindication and establishment of it, and are the rule of doctrine both to preachers and hearers; and which are "perfect", contain the whole mind and will of God, both with respect to faith and practice; whereby the man of God is made perfect, and thoroughly furnished to all good works,... (John Gill's Exposition of the Bible, Commentary on Psalms 19:7, Source)
So here we see that the verse is telling us that the Law of God is perfect and that man is also made perfect through the Law (according to Gill) because it 'revives the soul' according to verse 17.
Now let us turn to Paul and see what he thought about the Law...
The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless 19(for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.
The NIV Bible commentary says...
Perfection was not possible under the Levitical priesthood, but Jesus high-priestly ministry replaces the whole OT system of approaching God and perfects believers in a relationship with him. (NIV Bible Commentary, Commentary on Hebrews 7:1-28)
John Gill says...
And next the apostle proves the imperfection of the Levitical priesthood from this consideration, that there is another priest risen up, not of the order of Aaron, but of the order of Melchizedek, of which there would have been no need, if the Levitical priesthood had been perfect; nor would it have been changed, as it is, and which has also made a change of the law, by which it is established, necessary,...(John Gill's Exposition of the Bible, Commentary on Hebrews 7:8, Source)
Paul says once again...
By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.
NIV Bible commentary says...
The need for the priesthood, sanctuary and sacrificial system of the old covenant is now removed. This makes it possible for believers of every race and culture to draw near to God through Jesus. Although God says nothing specifically about this in the prophecy of Jeremiah, by calling this covenant new, he has made the first one obsolete. So the ritual provisions of the old covenant are at the heart of what is obsolete and ageing and will soon disappear. (NIV Bible Commentary, Commentary on Hebrews 8:13)
Here we clearly see conflicting opinions regarding the Old Testament Law. The Old Testament says that it is perfect but the New Testament says that it is not. So who is right?
Back to Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.
Women in Islam and the Bible.
Rebuttals by Bassam Zawadi.
Islam and the Noble Quran - Questions and Answers.
Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible.
Questions about Jesus that trinitarian Christians don't have logical answers for.
What parts of the Bible do Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") believe are closest to the Truth? and Why?
"Allah" was GOD Almighty's original Name in the Bible according to the Hebrew and Aramaic sources.
Scientific Miracles in Islam and the Noble Quran.
Most of the Bible's books and gospels were written by mysterious people!
Jesus mentioned Muhammad by the name in the Bible.
Did Isaiah 53 really prophesies about the crucifixion of Jesus? It supports Islam's claims about Jesus peace be upon him never died on the cross. I also addressed John 19:36-37 from the Bible and proved that Jesus never got crucified, since GOD Almighty promised that he will protect Jesus' body and not let even a single bone be broken. My question to all Christians is: How in the world is it possible for the feet to get nailed on the cross without any penetration to the bones by the nails, hence breaking part of the feet's bones?! I also added refutations to Exodus 12:46, Numbers 9:12, Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 34:20, which supposedly prove the Christians' belief about Jesus crucifixion. I proved that this dogma has no truth what so ever and exposed the wrong Trinitarian English translation of Zechariah 12:10.
Send your comments.
Back to Main Page.
What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube