Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Tahmeed

Pages: [1] 2
1
Assalamu alaikum everyone!!!

We all know Allah's Divine claim:

[003:059]  The similitude of Jesus before God is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: "Be". And he was.

Now we also know that each of the names 'Isa/Masih' and "Adam" occurs 25 times in the Quran which has been discussed in this article-

Adam and Jesus have the same occurrences in the Noble Quran:
http://www.answering-christianity.com/adam_jesus_miracle.htm

But bro Osama if we stop there the bloody infidels will say this is just a coincidence!

So ALLAH Almighty has given us a back up!

Look what this article says- http://www.discoveringislam.org/return_of_jesus.htm

Though it's about 'The return of Jesus', it has a interesting section (number 15) named  "The similarity between Jesus and Adam"

If you just add one chart and some explanation, it will be solid In-shaa-Allah!

I am quoting from the article now.

Quote
15. The similarity between Jesus and Adam

The 59th verse of the Sura 3 (Family of Imran) points to a similarity between Adam and Jesus. There is no other comparison like that between any other two prophets in the Quran. How many times are each of Jesus' first name and the word "Adam" mentioned in the Quran? Exactly 25 times each.

The verse that points to this similarity between Jesus and Adam is :

[3:59] The example of Jesus, as far as GOD is concerned, is the same as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him, "Be" so he becomes.

If we study the numerical value of the names,  عِيسَى (Jesus  in Arabic) and  ءَادَمَ (Adam in Arabic), we will find that the numerical values of Jesus: 70 +10+ 60 +10 and of Adam: 1+ 1+ 4 + 40.

If we add all the digits of Jesus and Adam:  7+0+1+0+6+0+1+0+1+1+4+4+0 = 25.

Jesus' name is mentioned 25 times in the Quran and also Adam's name is mentioned 25 times in the Quran.

Trinitarian Christians believe Jesus is God because Jesus was created without a father. Such a blasphemous belief is contrary to the omnipotence of God. God provides us with Adam as the ultimate, miraculously created human being whom God created, though Adam had no father and no mother. Whereas Jesus had at least mother, but no father.  Adam's birth was more miraculous than Jesus' birth. Since Christian believe Adam was a merely a human being, so they should recognize that Jesus was also merely a human being like Adam.

By doing so, God shows how illogical it is to attribute to Jesus divine qualifications. God, while referring to the similarity between Adam and Jesus, also supports this statement with numerical miracles mentioning each of Jesus and Adam  25 times in the Quran.

The numerical miracle is not limited to this alone. Let’s examine the table below: 



Verse 59 of Sura Family of Imran (Chapter 3) illustrates the relationship between Adam and Jesus. It is the only verse in which these two names are mentioned together. In this verse, both these two names are used the 7th time from the beginning of the Quran. On the other hand, these two names in verse 59 are the 19th time they are mentioned in Quran, if we start counting from the end of the Quran.

From the beginning of the Quran to verse 3:59, there are 352 verses. In 3:59, the names Adam and Jesus are used for the 7th time. So, we get: 352 + 7 = 359 which refers to verse 3:59

We would like to present another interesting point. How many times the word Mary is used in the Quran? 34 times. As we have mentioned earlier, Jesus is mentioned by name is Sura Mary in verse 34.

ذَلِكَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ قَوْلَ الْحَقِّ الَّذِي فِيهِ يَمْتَرُونَ

34. Such is ‘Isa son of Maryam (Jesus son of Mary. That is) the truth about which these people doubt.

The 19th occurrence of each of the names of Jesus and Adam in the Quran (if we count from the beginning of the Quran) is in the Sura Mary which is the 19th Sura of the Quran. The word Jesus appears in verse 34 and the word Adam appears in the verse 58 of Sura Mary. If we start counting from the verse 34 (including verse 34), we find that verse 58 is the 25th verse.

أُوْلَئِكَ الَّذِينَ أَنْعَمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِم مِّنَ النَّبِيِّينَ مِن ذُرِّيَّةِ آدَمَ وَمِمَّنْ حَمَلْنَا مَعَ نُوحٍ وَمِن ذُرِّيَّةِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْرَائِيلَ وَمِمَّنْ هَدَيْنَا وَاجْتَبَيْنَا إِذَا تُتْلَى عَلَيْهِمْ آيَاتُ الرَّحْمَن خَرُّوا سُجَّدًا وَبُكِيًّا

58. These are the people on whom Allah bestowed Favour from among the Prophets of the seed of Adam and of those (believers) whom We (saved and) carried with Noah in the Ark, and of the descendants of Abraham and Israel (Jacob) and of those (chosen ones) whom We guided and exalted. When the Verses of the Most Kind (Lord) are recited to them, they fall down prostrating themselves in (profuse) tears.


I have not confirmed it yet. But I will soon is-shaa-Allah.

The site is mainly about the End of Time signs and incidents. You will find it very interesting!

Your brother in Islam,

Tahmeed

2
Assalamu alaikum all brothers and sisters,

Specially brother Osama,

Previously I asked about this fabricated Hadith and if someone could translate this thread (http://www.ahlalhdeeth.com/vb/showthread.php?t=205706 ) but no one did :( But Alhamdulillah I just found incredible material proving that this hadith is nothing but a big fat lie!

I found this article in a Facebook Group. May Allah bless that Group and the admins! It provides ample proof that the narrators in the chain are mostly liars!

Till now, I haven’t found any Islamic Site (which answer critics, like AC, Call to Monotheism, Turning the Table etc…) having a detail article about this, just some forum chats like the one in Multaqa Ahl Al-Hadeeth. But this is such a serious matter so I think you, bro Osama, should add this article in the main AC site, it will be greatly helpful for Muslims in-shaa-Allah!

If you do so, mention these two links please, the admin of the group translated from here.

https://antishubohat.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/hassan_shubha/
and   http://www.4salaf.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1221

Now read the article. I copy pasted directly so if you have a problem please ask me. The bibliography is also provided below the article.

Please read the whole article!

======ARTCLE=========

Assalamo Alaykom ,
BismiLah Al Rahman Al Raheem

Refutation of the lie :
The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ used to kiss Al Hussein’s ( little ) Penis !!!
 
What Christians and Hadith Rejecters don’t understand is : we don’t accept narrations just like that , we don’t accept narrations from weak narrators , from unknown people but only from trusted people .
 
Imam Muslim says in the introduction of his book Sahih Muslim :
 
Know - may Allah, exalted is He, grant you success – that what is obligatory upon everyone who is aware of the distinction between the Sahīh transmissions and their weak, the trustworthy narrators from those who stand accused, is to not transmit from them except what is known for the soundness of its emergence and the protection of its narrators; and that they fear what may be from those accused (of deficiency in narrating) and the stubborn people of innovation . [ 1 ]
 
Takhrij Al Hadith ( tracking of hadith ) :
 
This Hadith have 5  ways ( was narrated by 5 people about the messenger of Allah ﷺ  with different chains ) : 
1==   Hadith of Ibn Abbas RA ,
2== Hadith Abi Dabyan (a companion of a companion ) ,
3==   Hadith Jabir ibn Abdellah RA ,
4==   Hadith of Abi Layla Al Ansari ,
5==  Hadith of Anas ben Malik RA .
 
In shaa Allah we will list all the books who mentioned the Hadith ,all the different Isnads the Hadith have been reported with  , will see what scholars said about the Hadith , will check the chains of Narrations ( Isnad )  of each Hadith and see either if it is authentic or just someone fabricated the Hadith and the chains of Narration  .
 
1 ==   Hadith of Ibn Abbas RA
 
 
Al Tabari said :
Al Hasan ben Ali Al Faswi  narrated to us about Khaled ben Yazid Al Arni , about Jarir , About Qabous ben Abi Dabyan about his father , that Ibn Abbass RA said :
He (the prophet) put Husein’s legs apart and kissed his (little) penis . [ 2 ]
 
What Christians and HR don’t know is that there is a defect in this Hadith , which is Qabous ben Abi Dabyan ; Who is a weak narrator according to the scholars of Jarh and Taadil .
 
Ibn Al Mulaqan in Al Badr Al Munir, after he cited the Hadith commented : Qabous , Al Nisaai and others said  he is not a strong narrator . [ 3 ]
Ibn Saad said : he is a weak narrator and his narration shouldn’t take as a testimony . [ 4 ]
 
Al Nisaai said : Not a Strong narrator . [ 5 ]
 
Ibn Hibban said : he was a bad memorizer (weak memory ) ,he used to narrate about his father things no other one has mentioned .  [ 6 ]
 
Al Dahabi in Mizan Al Itidal :
Qabous ben Abi Dabyan ; Ibn Mouyein ,Abo Hatim ,Nisaii and Ibn Hiban declared him  : not a trustworthy narrator . [ 7 ]
 
Al Albani in Asilsila Daeefa : commented on the Hadith as weak he cited what the scholars said about Qabous . [ 8 ]
 
Ibn Hajar in Al Talkhis Al Habir : Hadith is Daeef and Qabous is not a trustworthy narrator. [ 9 ]
 
Muheyii Deen Al Dimashqi in Khulasat Al Ahakam : weak Hadith . [ 10 ]
 
Muhamed ben Tahir Al Maqdisi in Dakhirat Al hufad : weak Hadith and Qabous is a weak narrator . [ 11 ]
 
Imam Shawkani in Nail Al Awtar : in the Isnad Qabous ben abi Dabyan , declared weak by Al Nisaai . [ 12 ]
 
 
2 == Hadith of Abi Dabyan 
 
Ibn Abi Dunya narrated about his sheikh Isaac ben Ismail about Jarir about Qabous ben Abi Dabyan about his father :
the prophet used to put Al Husein’s legs apart and kiss his (little) penis . [ 13 ]
 
This Isnad reported by Ibn Abi Dunya here is much weaker than the one reported by Al Tabari, because it adds another defect which is :  Qabous ben Abi Dabyan attributed the Hadith directly to the prophet ﷺ .
 
-The Isnad reported by Tabari was : ….. Qabous ben Abi Dabyan about his father , that Ibn Abbass RA said .
-The Isnad reported by Ibn Abi Dunya is :….. Qabous ben Abi Dabyan about his father .
 
In the science of Hadith we call it “ Mursal Hadith ” which means a companion of the companion (of the prophet ﷺ ) narrates directly from the Prophet ﷺ without mentioning the companion which he heard the Hadith from .
Dabyan the father of Qabous narrated the Hadith directly from the Prophet ﷺ .
The father of Qabous was a companion of a companion of the prophet ﷺ. he never saw the prophet ﷺ .
 
So , the narration reported by Ibn Abi Dunya has two problems :
1= Qabous ben Abi Dabyan is a weak narrator
2= the Hadith is Mursal .
 
3 ==   Hadith of Jabir ibn Abdullah RA
 
Ibn Asaker narrated in  Tarikh Dimashk (history of Damascus )  :
Abu Al Kasim Ali Ben Ibrahim and Abu Al Hassan Ali ben Ahmed , about Abu mansour ben Zurayq told us , about Abu Bakr  Ahmed ben Ali Al Khateeb , about Al Azhari , about Al muaafi ben Zakarya , about Muhamed ben Mazyad ben Abi Al Azhar , about Ali ben Muslim Al Tousi , about Said ben Ameir , About Qabous ben Abi Dabyan , about his father , about his grandfather , about Jabir ben Abd Allah RA .
And he narrated to us Another time  ( Qabous )  about his  father , about jabir ben Abd Allah RA said :
I saw the messenger of Allah ﷺ putting Al Hassan’s legs apart and kissed his  (little) penis and Saying : May Allah curse the one who will kill you  . End quot  [ 14 ]
 
A fabricated narration : In the Isnad we have a weak narrator and a liar.
 
Ibn Asakir in the next page , after citing the hadith said : Al Khateeb Said : this hadith is a fabricated one both its Isnad (the chain of narration) and its Matn (the story ) , and I think that Ibn Abi Al Azhar put / invented / fabricated  it , then attributed it to Qabous about his father about his grandfather about Jabir ben Abdellah RA; when he released that this Isnad is impossible he changed it to Qabous about his father about jabir RA .End quot
 
Al  Kahteeb Al Baghdadi in Tarikh Baghdad , after citing the Hadith :
 
this hadith is a fabricated one both its Isnad (the chain of narration) and its Matn (the story ) , and I think that Ibn Abi Al Azhar fabricated  it (made it up ) , then attributed it to Qabous about his father about his grandfather about Jabir ben Abdellah RA; when he released that this Isnad is impossible he changed it to Qabous about his father about jabir RA ; Abu Dabyan ( the father of Qabous ) met Salman Al Farisi RA and Ali Ben Abi Talib RA and heard Hadith from them  ,
the father of Qabous ‘s name was Huseein ben Jundob , and this Jundob ( the grandfather of Qabous ) we don’t know if he was  either a Muslim or a Kafir .
there is another evidence that shows the Hadith is fabricated : it is impossible for Said ben Ameir to narrate from Qabous , they never met each other , Said is from Basra and Qabous from Kufa ,more than that Qabous died before Said was born . End quot  [ 15 ]
 
The defects in the Narration are :
 
1 = Qabous ben Abi Dabyan as we mentioned earlier is a weak narrator.
2 = Muhamed ben Mazyad ben Abi Al Azhar is a Liar .
3 = broken chain of narration
 
Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani said in Lisan Al Mizan :
Al Khateeb said : it’s possible that ibn Abi Al Azhar fabricated the Hadith , he fabricated many Ahadith ; he was (Muhamed ben Mazyad)  not a trustworthy narrator, he used to fabricate Hadith and attribute it to a trusted narrators .
Al Daraqoutni : he was weak ; other fabricated Ahadith were narrated about him .
Abu Al Hassan ben Al Furat said , Abu Al Fath Ubaid Allah ben Ahmed Al Nahwi said :the scholars of Hadith declared ben abi Al Azhar as a liar .
Al Marzabani said : the scholars of Hadith declared him as a liar ; and I say he was a shameless liar  . End quot [ 16 ]
 
Al Tarablosi in Al Kashf Al Hatit : a fabricated Hadith . [ 17 ]
 
Al Dahabi in Mizan Al Itidal :  a fabricated Hadith , Muhammed ben Mazyad ben Abi Al Azhar is a liar . [18]
 
Imam Shawkani in Al Fawaid al majmouaa : this Hadith of Jabir about the prophet ﷺ kissing Husein’s little penis , Al Khateeb said it is fabricated both Isnad and Matn . [ 19 ]
 
A fabricated Hadith said Ibn Al Jawzi in Al Mawduaat (the fabricated ones ). [ 20 ]
 
Ibn Iraq Al Qinani Al Shafii in his book Tanzih Al Sharia : a fabricated Hadith . [ 21 ]
 
Jalal udeen Al Suyuti in Al La alyi’ Al Masnouaa fi Al Ahadith Al Maoudouaa : a made-up Hadith. [22]
 
4 ==   Hadith of Abi Layla Al Ansari
 
Al Bayhaqi narrated in his book Al Sunan Al Kubra :
 
Abu bakr Al Qadi and Abu Said ben Abi Amrou said, Abu Al Abbas Muhamed ben Yacoub said, muhamed ben Isaac  said ,Muhamed ben Imraan about his father , about ben Abi Layla about Isa about Abd-alrahman ben Abi Layla said :
We were at the presence of Rasoul Allah , and al Hasan came to him  ,he kissed his (little) penis. [23]
 
Al Bayhaqi himself commented on this narration as weak , he cited the narration then just after he commented : and this Isnad is not strong  ; In the Isnad there is Muhamed ben Abd-alrahman ben Abi Layla , who is a weak narrator .
 
Al Albani said in Irwa’ Al Ghalil : the Hadith was narrated by ibn Abi Layla who is Muhamed ben Abd-alrahman ben Abi Layla and he is a weak narrator for his bad memorization . [ 24 ]
 
Al Dahabi said in Mizan Al Itidal  :
 
Abu Zuraa (Al Razi) said : not a strong narrator .
and Ahmed (ben Hanbal ) Said : confused (used to mix narrations ) .
and Shuba said : I didn’t saw worse than his memorization .
Yahya Al Qatan said : he had a very bad memorization / memory.
Nisaii : not so strong .
Al Daraqoutni : weak memorization , illusionist .
Abu Ahmed Al hakim : most of his narrations are
Reversed /mixed. [ 25 ]
 
Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani in Al Talkhis Al Habir : Muhamed ben Abd-alrahman ben Abi Layla is a weak narrator . [ 26 ]
 
Ibn Al Mulaqan said in Al Badr Al Munir : …. Weak Hadith . [ 27 ]
 
Imam Nawawi in Al Majmou’ Sharh Al Muhadab : … Hadith of Abi Layla is weak . [ 28 ]
 
Ibn Abi Dunya in Al Iyal : weak Hadith . [ 29 ]
 
5 ==  Hadith of Anas ben Malik RA
 
Ibn Asaker in Tarikh Dimashq :
 
Abu Muhamed Ismail ben Abi Al Qasim , about Abu Hafs Omar ben Ahmed ben Masrour ,about Al Hakim Abu Ahmed Muhamed ben muhamed  ben Ahmed Al Hafiz , about Abu Yusef Muhamed ben Sufyan Al Safaar in Al Masisa , about Al yaman ben Said , about Al Harith ben Atiya , about Shu’ba , About Al Hakam , about Ibrahim , About Anas RA that he said : I saw the messenger of Allah ﷺ putting Al Hassan’s legs apart and kissed his  (little) penis . [30]
 
Tamam Al Razi in Al Fawaid : Al Hassan ben Al Hassan ben Alan Al Harani Al Hafiz told us , about Muhamed ben Sufyan Al masisi , about Al yaman ben Saiid ,about  Al harith ben Atia, About Shu’ba , about Al hakam , about Ibraheem , that Anas ben malik Said : I saw the messenger of Allah ﷺ putting Al Hassan’s legs apart and kissed his  (little) penis . [ 31 ]
 
The Narration is too weak for 6 reasons :
 
1 =  This is a weak Isnad , Al Yaman ben Said al Masisi is a weak narrator .
Imam Ibn Hajar Al Haithami said in his book Tuhfat Al Muhtaj fi sharh al minhaj  :
Ibn Asakir narrated in his Tarikh with a >>weak Isnad 32 ]
 
Al Yaman Ben Said al masisi , Al Daraqoutni classified him among the weak narrators in his book Al Duaffa’ wal Matroukin (the weak narrators and those who shouldn’t take narrations from them ). [ 33 ]
 
Ibn AL Jawzi in Al Duafaa wal Matroukin : Yaman ben Said Abu redwan Al Shami Al Masisi , Daraqoutni Said he is weak . [ 34 ]
 
Al  Dahabi in Al Mughni fi Al Duafaa : Yaman Ben Said al masisi , Al Daraqoutni classified him among the weak narrators . [ 35 ]
 
Al Dahabi in Mizan ul Itidal :
Yaman Ben Said al masisi , declared weak by Al Daraqoutni . [ 36 ]
 
Ibn Hajar in lisan Al Mizan :
Yaman Ben Said al masisi , declared weak by Al Daraqoutni and others …. [ 37 ]
 
2 =  In the Isnad Al Harith ben Atiya Al Basri .
 
Ibn Hajar in Tahdib Al Tahdib : …. Al Saji Said , he is a weak narrator, Ahmed said  I didn’t took Hadith from him . [ 38 ]
 
3 =  Muhamed ben Sufyan Al Masisi is not mentioned in the biographies of narrators , an unknown narrator .
 
4 =  Ibrahim that was mentioned in the Hadith full name is Ibn yazid Al Nukhaai , and he is a Mudalis ( used to change the Isnad - to make it short -  and attribute narrations to someone who didn’t say it ) .
 
Al Ala’yi in Jamii’ Al tahseel : Ibrahim ben Yazid Al Nukhaai , Al hakim mentioned that he was a dangerous Mudalis…. . [ 39 ]
 
5 =  The Hadith is maktou’ (broken chain of narration ) because Ibrahim ben Yazid al Nukhaai never heard from any Sahabi .
Al Ala’ii in Jamii’ Al tahseel :
 
Ibrahim ben Yazid Al Nukhaai , was a Mudalis and used to narrate Hadith with a broken Isnads , Ali ben Al Madini said : Ibrahim never met any of the Sahaba of the prophet [ 40 ]
   
 
6= Al Hakam ben Utaiba is a Mudalis .
Al Ala’i in Jamii’ Al tahsil :
Al Hakam ben Utaiba accused of being a Mudalis according of many scholars . [ 41 ]



Bibliography :
 
[ 1 ] Chapter 1 : The Obligation of Transmitting on Authority of Trustworthy         Narrators and Abandoning the Liars .
http://www.sunnah.com/muslim/introduction
[ 2 ]  Al Mujam Al Kabir by Al Tabarani vol 3 , p 51 , N° 2658 .
Also narrated by Al Dyaa’ in his book Al Ahadith Al Mukhtara vol 9 , P 555 , N° 549 .
[ 3 ]  Ibn Al Mulaqan , Al Badr Al Munir fi Takhrij Al Ahdith wa Al Atar Al Waqiaa fi Al Sharh Al Kabir  vol 2 p 479 .
البدر المنير في تخريج الاحاديث الواقعة في الشرح الكبير لابن الملقن ج2 ص479 ط دار الهجرة – الرياض
[ 4 ] Ibn Saad , Al Tabaqat Al Kubra vol 8 , p 459 .
[ 5 ] Al Nisaai , Al Duafaa wal Matroukin p 227 .
[ 6 ]  Ibn Hibban , Al Majrouhin min Al Mutahaditeen vol 2 , p 219 .
[ 7 ]  Al Dahabi , Mizan Al Itidal  vol 5 , p 445 .
[ 8 ]  Al Albani , Asilsila Daeefa vol 5 p 28 Hadith N° 2029 .
[ 9 ] Ibn Hajar ,  Al Talkhis Al Habir vol 1 p 127 .
تلخيص الحبير في تخريج أحاديث الرافعي الكبير بن حجر العسقلاني ج1 ص222 ط مؤسسة قرطبة .
[10] Muheyii Deen Al Dimashqi Khulasat Al Ahakam vol 1 p 138 N° 283 .
[11] Muhamed ben Tahir Al Maqdisi, Dakhirat Al hufad vol 2 , p 769 , N° 1466 .
ذخيرة الحافظ لمحمد بن طاهر المقدسي ص769 ح1466 ط دار الدعوة بالهند، ودار السلف بالرياض .
[12]  Shawkani , Nail Al Awtar vol 2 , p 53 .
[13] Ibn Abi Dunyaa , Al iyal vol 1 , p 376 , N° 211.
كتاب العيال لابن أبي الدنيا ج1/ص 376 برقم 211
[14]  Ibn Asaker,Tarikh Dimashk (history of Damascus )  vol 14 , p 224 .
[15] Al  Kahteeb Al Baghdadi , Tarikh Baghdad vol 3 , p 290 .
[16] Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani ,  Lisan Al Mizan vol 7 ,  p 501.
[17]  Al Tarablosi ,Al Kashf Al Hatit aman romia bewada’ al Hadith vol 1 , p 248 , N° 733 .
[18] Al Dahabi , Mizan Al Itidal vol 6, p 330 .
[19]  Shawkani , Al Fawaid al majmouaa fi al Ahadith al mawduaa , vol 1 , p 388 , N° 107 .
[20]  Ibn Al Jawzi , Al Mawduaat (the fabricated ones ) vol 1 , p 307 .
[21] Ibn Iraq Al Qinani , Tanzih Al Sharia Al Marfouaa an Al Akhbar Al Maoudouaa , vol 1 , p 408 .
تنزيه الشريعة المرفوعة لابن عراق الكناني ج1/ص 408 .
[22] Jalal udeen Al Suyuti , Al La alyi’ Al Masnouaa fi Al Ahadith Al Maoudouaa vol 1 , p 358 .
[23] Al Bayhaqi , Al Sunan Al Kubra  vol 1 , p 137 , N° 637 .
[24] Al Albani , Irwa’ Al Ghalil , vol 6 , p 213 .
[25] Al Dahabi ,  Mizan Al Itidal vol 6 , p 222 .
[26] Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani , Al Talkhis Al Habir vol 1 p 127 ,N° 169 .
[27]  Ibn Al Mulaqan , Al Badr Al Munir fi Takhrij Al Ahdith wa Al Athar Al Waqiaa fi Al Sharh Al Kabir  vol 2 , p 478 .
[28] Imam Nawawi , Al Majmou’ Sharh Al Muhadab vol 2 , p 54  .
[29] Ibn Abi Dunya , Al Iyal vol 1  , p 375 , N° 210 .
[30] Ibn Asaker ,  Tarikh Dimashq , vol 13 , p 222 .
[31] Tamam Al Razi , Al Fawaid , vol 1 , p 251 , N° 610 .
[32] Ibn Hajar Al Haithami ,Tuhfat Al Muhtaj fi sharh al minhaj  vol 7 , p 196  .
[33] Daraqoutni  , Al Duaffa’ w Al Matroukin p 206 , N° 609 .
[34] Ibn AL Jawzi ,  Al Duafaa wal Matroukin , vol 3 , p 218 , N° 3838  .
[35] Al  Dahabi , Al Mughni fi Al Duafaa , vol 2 , p 760 , N° 7219 .
[36] Al Dahabi , Mizan ul Itidal vol 7 , p 289 .
[37] Ibn Hajar , lisan Al Mizan vol 6 , p 316 , N° 1135  .
[38] Ibn Hajar , Tahdib Al Tahdib , vol 2 , p 131 , N° 256 .
[39] Al Ala’yi , Jamii’ Al tahsil , vol 1 , p 104  , N° 1
جامع التحصيل للعلائي ج1/ص104 رقم1
[40]  Al Ala’ii , Jamii’ Al tahsil , vol 1, p 141,N° 13 .
[41] Al Ala’i , Jamii’ Al tahsil ,vol 1 ,p 106  ,N° 13 .



Translated from
 
https://antishubohat.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/hassan_shubha/
and   http://www.4salaf.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1221
 
with modifications
 
Le Samedi 29 - 08 - 15
Al Hamdu Lilahi Rabi Al Alamin
 
 
Sunnah Is Revelation

===============The End=============

So bro Osama, please tell me what you think about this article soon and also if you find any problems here. Waiting for your reply! :)

Your brother in Islam,
Sadat Tahmeed

3
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / ODIN AND DAJJAL!!!!!!!
« on: September 13, 2015, 11:32:34 AM »
Seems like many people like Thor, Loki and Asgard... and Odin too! Thanks to the movie 'Thor' !!!

Well, let me share something with you. I have read in a Satanist group (Teens4Satan- real Spiritual Satanists, not hoax) people saying this.....

"Hail Satan, Hail ODIN..."

Very strange it looked to me at first..... until, Hadith gave me light!

Why don't we take a look at these pictures of Odin?





And match the picture of Masih ad-Dajjal (The False Messiah)!



The two horns on his head... (the horns of Satan) and... a right eye... not just blind..... like a berry/grape in the painting (as prophesied in Hadith)! His pose is indeed like a furious monster, an evil one... the ultimate new ruler of a "New World Order"!

Remember, Indeed Dajjal is one eyed but your LORD is not one eyed!

May Allah save us from the Grand Fitna of Masih ad-Dajjal!

4
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / YHWH the Egyptian moon God??
« on: August 17, 2015, 06:12:05 AM »
The next time a bigoted jew or a christian shows you this image to prove that Allah is a moon god; (Nauzubillah)





Show him the following one!

A drachm (quarter shekel) coin from the Persian province of Yehud, apparently showing the god YHW (Yahweh) as a bearded man seated on a winged and wheeled throne!

Search google on 'Yahweh the egyptian moon god' and u r going to get interesting metarial.

I am not a stupid that I will say YHWH is a pagan moon god. He can be the real God. But I wish this will cause the bigots to stop barking and listen to us without being biased.

'ALLH is not a moon god. He is the true God. He never told us to make an idol for Him and worship it. Rather, what He really said is-

"Among His Signs are the Night and the Day, and the Sun and the Moon. Adore not the sun and the moon, but adore God, Who created them, if it is Him ye wish to serve.  (The Noble Quran, 41:37)"

LET US TURN THE TABLE BROTHERS!

Tahmeed

5
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Translation needed!!!!!
« on: July 18, 2015, 01:48:31 PM »
Assalamu alaikum dear brother,

I saw the discussion about the hadith on 'penis kissing' before and this link was given http://www.ahlalhdeeth.com/vb/showthread.php?t=205706 It proves that the hadith is daef. But the whole thread is in Arabic. Can someone give me a English link or translate it completely? It is highly recommended that you hurry because a christian is barking on FB!

Waiting for reply
Tahmeed

6
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Jesus/Ieosus=Hail Zeus!!!!!
« on: July 08, 2015, 01:42:38 PM »
Assalamu alaikum dear brothers and sisters,

I saw the following thing on FB (Christian Awakening vs Bible's photo) and it's very interesting! You may like it even if you knew it before!





Tanakh(Old Testament) rejects Christian's salvation. Christians deceiving and changing the name of Jesus in Gospels.

“Don’t rely on ‘princes’ or on that ‘son of man’ —he has no ‘salvation’! When his spirit departs he will turn back into his dust; on that very day all his schemes will be destroyed!” (Tehillim / Psalms146:3-4).

The term the Son of Man is used to refer to Jesus 32 times in Matthew,
The term the Son of man is in Mark 15 times,
The term the Son of man is in Luke 26 times.
The term the Son of man is in John 12 times.

In the first three gospels the title is always recorded as having been used by Jesus of himself and never by angel, by man, or by demon. "Just" Jesus as the "son of man."

Yet G-d warns you that the "son of man" has no salvation.
The son of many cannot save you.

But doesn't Jesus Hebrew name mean salvation?
First of all Jesus doesn't have a Hebrew name. The Christian bible was written in Greek, not in Hebrew. If Jesus ever lived no one knows what his Hebrew name might have been. It is impossible that it was the Hebrew name for "salvation."

Why?
Because Hebrew nouns are either feminine or masculine. There is no "gender neutral" noun. The Hebrew word for salvation is a FEMININE noun (יְשׁוּעָה - y'shu'AH) . Feminine as in female, girl, woman. . . not a man (let alone a son of man).

Hebrew is not spelled with vowles, but when voclaized there is a man's name spelled somewhat similarly -- but it is not the Hebrew word for salvation. The male name is "yeshu'a" is יֵשׁוּעַ - yeSHU'a, a masculine proper name.

As I mentioned, all we know of Jesus' "name" is what is found in Greek. In Greek the name is Ἰησοῦς Iesous, transliterating the Aramaic form יֵֽשׁוּ Yéshu (not יֵשׁוּעַ - yeSHU'a, a masculine proper name).

It does not and can not represent the Hebrew form יֵשֽׁוּעַ Yéshu'a because that form would transliterate into "Jesuas" and no missionaries who have tried to make up a Hebrew name for Jesus have ever called him "Jesuas."

The Yeshu'a name game (calling Jesus Yeshua) begain in the 1970s with the various Christian groups established primarily by Baptists to try to convert Jews to Christianity that had a veneer of Jewishness to it (e.g. "Jews for Jesus" and other "messianic" Christian groups). As the Baptists tried to add Jewish trappings to churches (calling their ministers "rabbi" and their churches "Synagogues) they started saying that Jesus' Hebrew name was יֵשֽׁוּעַ Yéshu'a so they could pretend it is the same as the common noun יְשׁוּעָה y'shu'ah (which is feminine and means "salvation").
As shown in this post this deception is transparently obvious to anyone who can read Hebrew (even without understanding the words).

The two words' pronunciation (the feminine word meaning "salvation" versus the male name) are very different: the vowel of the first syllable of יֵשֽׁוּעַ Yéshu'a is tzéré, a full-valued vowel having the sound of the "ay" in the English word bay and the accented syllable is the שֽׁוּ -shu-, whereas the yod in יְשׁוּעָה y'shu'ah is pointed with sh'va na, a "snatched" half-vowel that has no sound of it's own and causes the yod to be subsumed into the compound syllable y'shu-, and the stress in this case falls on the final syllable, -ah.
There is only one G-d, and He does not share His glory with another. There is no salvation from the "son of man."
"Remember the first things of old, that I am G-d and there is no other; I am G-d and there is none like Me." Yeshayahu / Isaiah 46:9



May Allah give us the power to understand His true religion, as He is the Almighty, Lord of the Universe!
From your brother in Islam,
Tahmeed

7
Assalamu alaikum dear brothers and sisters,

Please answer the question: Can Jizyah be applied in this 21st century? Add scholarly commentaries pls, I am confused. Your personal opinion will also be appreciated!

Reply soon. It's very important!
Tahmeed

8
Assalamu alaikum evryone,

Has this been refuted? Can someone pls give me the link?

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Bhavishya_Purana

I have seen this on other sites too. Is this true? Pls, this needs to be refuted.

And one thing about bhavishya purana; it's too much identical with the bible.... Geneologies, great flood, even the measurement of the ark, prophets..... even jesus christ. Things that other hindu scriptures don't contain. something is fishy. The islam-hating missionaries could have wrote the whole book during british reign in india.

Pls brothers, reply soon. I'm willing to make an article on this.

Tahmeed

9
Assalamu alaikum everyone,

In all my debates in these three days, I had to face one common arguement...."Islam inspires terrorism", "ISIS is the example of muslims"....etc. So I felt like writing a long article about it.

Here, I didn't prove that ISIS is American or Israeli.....etc. Because I can't argue on something I don't know. And moreover, I've seen on FB that infidels make fun of it. So, I demonstrated couple of stunning hadiths here which prophesy that such a group like ISIS, Taliban, Al-Qaeeda... was expected to come and we have to keep away from them. I am so sorry if this has already been discussed on any article, any post in the blog/main site or brother Osama's debate 'Is ISIS Islamic?'. But the topic is so important that I had to highlight it again. Read with patience, brothers and sisters. I hope I've been able to set up the climax perfectly!!

(References: The Bukhari and Muslim Hadiths are taken from PDF and Tirmidhi Hadiths are taken from Bengali 'Tirmidhi Sharif', I myself translated them. So please feel free to tell me if there is a problem with the Hadiths)

ISIS and other Terrorist Organizations in the eye of Islam

In the Name of Allah, Most Merciful, Most Gracious...

Killing: A Sign of the Last Hour......

Sahih Bukhari 9.183:
Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "Time will pass rapidly, good deeds will decrease, miserliness will be thrown (in the hearts of the people) afflictions will appear and there will be much 'Al−Harj." They said, "O Allah's Apostle! What is "Al−Harj?" He said, "Killing! Killing!" (See Hadith No. 63, Vol. 8 )

Sahih Bukhari 9.184:, Tirmidhi, V.4, Afflictions and Disaters, Hadith. 2147:
Narrated `Abdullah and Abu Musa: The Prophet said, "Near the establishment of the Hour there will be days during which Religious ignorance will spread, knowledge will be taken away (vanish) and there will be much Al−Harj, and Al−Harj means killing."

Sahih Bukhari 9.185:
Narrated Abu Musa: The Prophet said, "Near the establishment of the Hour there will be days during which (religious) knowledge will be taken away (vanish) and general ignorance will spread, and there will be Al−Harj in abundance, and Al−Harj means killing."

Sahih Bukhari 9.187: Narrated `Abdullah: The Prophet said, "Near the establishment of the Hour, there will be the days of Al−Harj, and the religious knowledge will be taken away and general ignorance will spread." Abu Musa said, "Al−Harj, in the Ethiopian language, means killing," Ibn Mas`ud added: I heard Allah's Apostle saying; (It will be) from among the most wicked people who will be living at the time when the Hour will be established."

What should Muslims do while this happens......

Sahih Muslim, Bk 41, Number 7042; and Tirmidhi, V.4, Afflictions and Disaters, Hadith. 2148:
Ma'qil b. Yasar reported Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: Worshiping during the period of widespread Fitna (turmoil) is like emigration towards me.

Tirmidhi, V.4, Afflictions and Disasters, Hadith. 2141:
Narrated Busr ibn Sa'yid. Duing the turmoil and rebellion of (the reign of) Caliph Uthman ibn Affan, Sa'ad ibn Abu Waqqas said, "I bear witness, that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) said, "Soon such disaster will appear when a man siiting will be better (safer) than a man standing, and a man standing will be better than a man walking, and a man walking will be better than a man running." Sa'ad said, "What do you (Rasulullah SAW) suggest that I do if a man of Fitna enters my house and attempts to kill me?" He (Rasul) said, "You will be like the son of Adam. (Abel didn't fight Cain when he was going to kill him).

Tirmidhi, V.4, Afflictions and Disasters, Hadith. 2150:
Narrated Udaisa bint Uh'ban ibn Saifi al-Gifari; Ali ibn Abu Talib came to my father and asked him to go to war with him. My father told him, "My friend and cousin (the Prophet) advised me that when people will start to fight with each other, I should make a wooden sword (so that I don't harm anyone). At present I did that. If you want I can take it and go with you." Then Ali left him as he was.

So dear Islam-haters, the violence was prophesied many years ago and the Hadiths are actually telling us to be at peace in this situation, not to join them! About the Hadith from Ma'qil, we know ISIS called for an emigration, but there is no emigration after the conquest of Mekkah. So muslim brothers, if you want the Sawab (virtue) of an emigration now, just sit in your home and worship Allah SWT.

Where will Fitna come from.......

Sahih Bukhari 9.212; Sahih Muslim, Bk 41, Number 6938:
Narrated Salim's father: The Prophet stood up beside the Mimbar (pulpit) (and pointed with his finger towards the East) and said, "Afflictions are there! Afflictions are there, from the side where the horns of Satan comes out," or said, "..the horns of the sun.."

Sahih Muslim, Bk 41, Number 6939:
Ibn 'Umar reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) stood by the door (of the apartment of) gafsa and, pointing towards the east, he said: The turmoil would appear from this side, viz. where the horns of Satan would appear, and he uttered these words twice or thrice and Ubaidullah b. Sa'ld in his narration said. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) had been standing by the door of 'A'isha.

Sahih Muslim, Bk 41, Number 6940:
Salim b. Abdullah reported on the authority of his father that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), while turning his face towards the east, said: The turmoil would appear from this side; verily, the turmoil would appear from this side; verily, the turmoil. would appear from this side−the side where appear the horns of Satan.

Stunning prophesy! Look at the map, Afghanistan and Pakistan, (Home of Taliban) are situated east from Arabia. Iraq, from where comes ISIS, is also at north-east from Medina, the place where the Prophet SAW prophesied this. Osama bin Laden's hometown, Riadh, straight east from Medina! And readers, 'HORNS OF SATAN', the Prophet SAW called them. You are gonna have to remember that term for the upcoming surprises!

More specific......

Sahih Muslim, Bk 41, Number 6943:
Ibn Fudail reported on the authority of his father that he heard Salim b. 'Abdullah b. 'Umar as saying: O people of IRAQ, how strange it is that you ask about the minor sins but commit major sins? I heard from my father 'Abdullah b. 'Umar, narrating that he heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying while pointing his hand towards the east: Verily. the turmoil would come from this side, from where appear the HORNS OF SATAN and you would strike the necks of one another; and Moses killed a person from among the people of Pharaoh unintentionally and Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, said:" You killed a person but We relieved you from the grief and tried you with (many a) trial" (xx. 40). Ahmad b. Umar reported this hadith from Salim, but he did not make a mention of the words:" I heard".

Tirmidhi, V.4, Afflictions and Disasters, Hadith. 2138:
Narrated Mua'bia ibn Qurra from his father; The Messenger of Allah (SAW) said, "When the People of SYRIA become evil, there will be no good for you anymore.. But a group of my Ummah will always be victorious (over evil). People willing to insult them will not be able to harm them till the Last Hour."

Sahih Bukhari 9.68:
Narrated Yusair bin `Amr: I asked Sahl bin Hunaif, "Did you hear the Prophet saying anything about Al−Khawarij?" He said, "I heard him saying while pointing his hand towards IRAQ. "There will appear in it (i.e, Iraq) some people who will recite the Qur'an but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out from (leave) Islam as an arrow darts through the game's body.' "

ISIS, as they say, is 'Islamic State of IRAQ and Sham' and sometimes 'Islamic State of IRAQ and SYRIA'! (Sham (north), Syria...almost same actually) And the Hadiths directly says that the horns of Satan and an ignorant group of people will appear from these places! And about the third Hadith, I'm not mixing up ISIS and khawariji. Ask any scholar if the terrorists are much like kwarijis or not. An important thing about khawarijis is they always want to establish an Islamic State.... of course that's a good thing, but to do this with violance is the 'Khawariji way'. And look at ISIS and Taliban.... Taliban already did that!

The next Hadith says how to deal with them......

Sahih Bukhari 9.64:
Narrated `Ali: Whenever I tell you a narration from Allah's Apostle, by Allah, I would rather fall down from the sky than ascribe a false statement to him, but if I tell you something between me and you (not a Hadith) then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may say things just to cheat my enemy). No doubt I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "During the last days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where−ever you find them, kill them, for who −ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection."

This Hadith is actually telling us to kill this 'YOUNG FOOLISH PEOPLE' wherever we find them! Don't misunderstand this brothers, only Islamic Government or 'Wali al-Amr' has the authority to wage war on a group or a nation, not everyone. But this Hadith clearly says how Islam sees this foolish group of people!

The Final Touch....

I hope you all know that an open letter was sent to ISIS proving that 'every single' work they are doing is wrong in the eye of Islam! And 126 scholars signed in it including many grand muftis, proffessors, Da'ees etc. Sorry I don't know actually when it was sent. Now I am going to quote the last and most interesting part of this letter (The pictures were added by me).

Quote from:  Open letter to ISIS by 100+ scholars (Last portion)
The Saying of Ali bin Abi Talib (k.)

Nu’aym ibn Hammad narrates in Al-Fitan, that the 4th Caliph, Ali ibn Abi Talib said: "When you see the black flags, remain where you are and do not move your hands or your feet. Thereafter there shall appear a feeble insignificant folk. Their hearts will be like fragments of iron. They will have the state. They will fulfil neither covenant nor agreement. They will call to the truth, but they will not be people of the truth. Their names will be parental attributions, and their aliases will be derived from towns. Their hair will be freeflowing like that of women. This situation will remain until they differ among themselves. Thereafter, God will bring forth the Truth through whomever He wills." (Kitab al-Fitan, Hadith. 573)

People are asking: does this narration by Ali bin Abi Talib (k.)—that is related by AlBukhari’s teacher (Nu’aym bin Hamad) over one thousand two hundred years ago in his book Al-Fitan—refer to the ‘Islamic State’?

Is it possible to understand the narration as follows?

‘When you see the black flags’: The flags of the ‘Islamic State’ are black.

Quote

‘Remain where you are’: i.e., stay where you are, O Muslims, and do not join them.
‘And do not move your hands or your feet’: i.e. do not help them financially or with equipment.
‘Thereafter there shall appear a feeble insignificant folk’: i.e. ‘weak’ and ‘insignificant’ in terms of understanding of religion, morality and religious practice. [I (Tahmeed) showed earlier, 'Foolish young people'!]
‘Their hearts will be like fragments of iron’: i.e. they will ruthlessly kill prisoners of war and cruelly torture people.
‘They will have the state’: For almost a century, no one has claimed to be an Islamic Caliphate other than the current ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and the Levant. ‘They will fulfil neither covenant nor agreement’: The ‘Islamic State’ did not fulfil its agreement with the Sha’etat tribe after the tribe pledged allegiance to them; indeed the ‘Islamic State’ slaughtered them by the hundreds. They also killed journalists.
‘They will call to the truth’: The ‘Islamic State’ calls to Islam.
‘But they will not be people of the truth’: The people of the truth are merciful. The Prophet Muhammad said: ‘Have mercy and you will be shown mercy.’
‘Their names will be parental attributions’: Like: ‘Abu Muthanna’, ‘Abu Muhammad’, ‘Abu Muslim’ and so on.
‘And their aliases will be derived from towns’: Like: ‘Al-Baghdadi’, ‘al-Zarqawi’, ‘alTunisi’ and so on.
‘Their hair will be free-flowing like that of women’: ‘Islamic State’ fighters have hair precisely like this.
‘Until they differ among themselves’: Like the differences between the ‘Islamic State’ and its parent, the al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria). The fighting between these two has led to around ten thousand deaths in a single year.
‘Thereafter, God will bring forth the truth through whomever He wills’: through a clear and correct Islamic proclamation (like this open letter).

The sage Luqman says in the Qur’an:
‘O my son! Even if it should be the weight of a grain of mustard-seed, and [even if] it be in a rock, or in the heavens, or in the earth, God will bring it forth. Truly God is Subtle, Aware.’ (Luqman, 31:16)


So muslim brothers and sisters, this ISIS and their brothers of Al-Qaeeda, Taliban... they are not men of true faith. Islam believes in peace, not killing of innocents. So beware and spread this messege to everyone, let the world know- 'ISIS is not Islamic'!

At last, Praise and Glory to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, and peace and mercy be upon His Messenger Sayyiduna Muhammad, his family and his companions!

Truth has come, Falsehood has perished, as Falsehood is to perish....(Isra 17:81)

Your brother in Islam,
Tahmeed

10
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Crucifixion: A joke
« on: May 08, 2015, 03:45:38 PM »
Assalamu alaikum dear brothers,

I heard this today at the mosque at Jumu'a prayer. Just wanted to share it

Some christians in Delhi raised a foul voice against Islam, "How can Muhammad be a true prophet when he couldn't even prophesy about the murder of his grandsons and couldn't do something about it??" This spread rapidly. At last this reached the ear of a great scholar of Delhi (forgot the name :P). His son was also a great scholar and he told him to do something about it. So the son called the missionaries and said discussed with them regarding this.

He said, "Listen, this matter was discussed long ago. In the night of Miraj, Muhammad SAW asked God about his grandchildren (i.e. what will be of them, whether they can be saved or not. Then God said, ''I COULDN'T EVEN SAVE MY SON FROM CRUCIFIXION AND YOU ARE HERE ASKING ABOUT YOUR GRANDSONS!!!" LOLLL ;D :P ;D

I wanted to post this on FB where we are in a debate on such topics. But guess what will happen if I post it....they will certainly say, 'Doesn't this prove that God has a son".....or something rubbish like that. So it's safe among muslims! Brothers, the scholar just made a joke to refute their lame logic....nothing more than that. The story he told about Miraj wasn't true.

By the way, if anyone wants to add something, he is free to share.....because I don't remember the story properly.

Salam...
Tahmeed

11
Ooops..Bro Osama, the topic was repeated, sorry. Can you remove it? The real one is here

http://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=1861.0

12
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Satanist websites
« on: May 02, 2015, 09:12:03 PM »
Assalamu alaikum dear brothers,

Yesterday I accidentally found this website. Do u know about it?

http://joyofsatan.org/

It's a big one and their believes looked very funny to me. This website mainly deals with christianity so no problem for us! Read this about 9/11 which is a judio christian thing.

http://www.angelfire.com/dawn666blacksun/Bible_Jewish_Witchcraft.htm

See how they picture satan!!



LOL :P :P :P


13
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Islam in the Bible
« on: April 17, 2015, 10:54:09 PM »
Assalamu alaikum brother Osama,

Do you have any detail article on 'Islam in the Bible' on the main site? I am having troubles finding it. Please help. :)

The thing is I just read this verse and am very excited.

[Jeremiah28:9] As for the Prophet who prophesies of Shalom (!), when the word of the prophet comes to pass, the Prophet will be kbown as whom the Lord has truly sent!

This verse doesn't only prove that Islam is the religion of all prophets (to understand this, read the preious verse) but also proves that Muhammad PBUH was a true prophet!

The clever translators always tranlate the word Shalom as 'peace'. So it's very hard to notice this amazing thing!

Glory to Allah and His true religion

Tahmeed

14
Assalamu alaikum brother Osama,

The NT and even the gospel of Barnabas (ch. 2) says that Mary took Joseph as her husband.

But we know that the Jews called her an aduteress. Even the Talmud says that.

If Joseph was really Mary's husband, they wouldn't make such a nasty claim. They would simply take Jesus as the son of Joseph.

Please reply soon.

Your brother,
Tahmeed

15
Assalamu alaikum bro Osama,

Recently I've been thinking about the symbol used for Islam (A crescent moon and a 5 pointed star) and I realized something.

Look at the past and present mythologies. The greek goddess of moon and hunting, Artemis, who was known as Diana in roman mythology; both are drawn with crescents on their heads. The hindu god shiva has a crescent on his head. Even the pagan arabian god hubal had a crescent on his head. So see, satan has his ways !

The mark they use for Islam, was invented neither by the prophet pbuh nor by any of his companions may ALLAH be pleased with them. So who gave the foul inventor of this symbol the right to make up an emblem for Allah's religion??

Aisha (R) reported, Rasulullah pbuj said, "He who innovates things in our affairs which is invalid, they are to be rejected." (Muslim, Kitab al Aqdiyya, chapter 6)

Narrated Ibn Sariyah...

........He (the prophet) then said, "I enjoin u to fear Allah, and to hear and obey even if it be an Abyssinian slave, for those of u who live after me will see great disagreement. You must then follow my sunnah and that of the rightly guided caliphs. Hold to it and stick fast to it. Avoid novelties, for every novelty is an innovation, and every innovation is an error."
(Abu Dawud pdf, hafith no. 4590)

Actually this symbol was invented in Turkey. Many bidats came from that place.

I guess u know about red cross and red crescent.  The organization's emblem was at first a red cross. Then the Turkeys brought the red crescent emblem for 'muslim use'. Read this:

The Red Cross flag is the colour-switched version of the Flag of Switzerland. In 1906, to put an end to the argument of Turkey that the flag took its roots from Christianity, it was decided to promote officially the idea that the Red Cross flag had been formed by reversing the federal colours of Switzerland, although no clear evidence of this origin had ever been found. [13]

THE RED CRESCENT

The Red Crescent emblem was first used by ICRC volunteers during the armed conflict between the Ottoman Empire and Russia (1877–1878). The symbol was officially adopted in 1929, and so far 33 Islamic states have recognized it.


(from http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Red_Cross_and_Red_Crescent_Movement)

(And read in wikipedia that israel wanted a 'red david's star' too but was rejected :P)

So the crescent is an alternative for the cross, huh? The christians have a nice emblem, why shouldn't we have one too?

And then satan thought, "Well, I can't take them back to paganism, but surely I can resurrect the pagan symbol I have been using for thousand years!"

(I am not mocking the red cross organisation here, I am just talking about why the emblem changed)

Almost every mosque has now this emblem. And what hurts me the most is that they included this symbol on the prophet's grave.

I wont say that this symbol is shirk, but it surely is evident bidat. Why would we need an emblem anyway? Just because the enemies of Allah have emblems of their own doesnt mean we should have one too. "We are muslims"- that's enough for us to represent ourselves.

And the idea of having an emblem is not the only thing muslims adopted from other religions. Things like rosary beads (known as Tasbi), pendants with Allah's name, birthday, armlets; are also adopted things, which the Prophet didnt use or perform..and so bidat.

Another fitna with this symbol is that the infidels use it to support their claim that muslims worship a moon god. NAUZUBILLAH.

Bro Osama do u have any artcles about this emblem? I think I saw one about the pendant with Allah's name.

Please reply soon and beware of bidats !!
Tahmeed

Pages: [1] 2

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube