Answering Christianity Research Center

Whats there to refute?
Its the same claims
Islam is violent,A'isha,Sun setting in Pool,Claims against Jumuah,etc,etc.

Since Saudi arabia is targetted,and I do admit it has alot of negatives,but lets take a moment and think about a few positives.
So in Saudi arabia there is a very very diversity of sects and major scholars from these other sects for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdallah_Bin_Bayyah
 
and Shi'a communities:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakhawila

So it isnt like Saudi arabia is a very very bad thing,it has its ups and downs.

I want to really answer some Muslims with doubts which are philosophical or something like "how do I know God exists?"
Needs contemplation,and these are really normal doubts in the mind of Muslims and you'll be able to come up with good and very straightforward Answers to these questions

So I'd advise people to spend atleast 30 minutes to contemplate.

I known him for 3 years,and yes,he's a pretty close friend. I'll try helping him.

So there has been this atheist "Godless cranium" who has been trying to demean Islam and insult Islam. and he has specifically attacked Mohammed Hijab with 2 videos. Both of them being refuted here.
so his first video is about Violence in Islam and trying desperately to refute Mohammed Hijabs arguments against such a claim.
so this video shows Godless cranium Quoting verse 8:12 but once you look at the context. the verse says
8:19 "If you [disbelievers] seek the victory – the defeat has come to you. And if you desist [from hostilities], it is best for you; but if you return [to war], We will return, and never will you be availed by your [large] company at all, even if it should increase; and [that is] because Allah is with the believers."
then he goes on to quote
9:29
but the context of 9:29 is in Historical sources seen as such
"He (Hadrat ‘Umar further) said: I had a companion from the Ansar and, we used to remain in the company of the Messenger turn by turn. He remained there for a day while I remained there on the other day, and he brought me the news about the revelation and other (matter), and I brought him (the news) like this. And we discussed that the Ghassanids were shoeing the horses in order to attack us. Id y companion once attended (the Apostle). And then came to me at night and knocked at my door and called me, and I came out to him, and he said: A matter of great importance has happened. I said: What is that? Have the Ghassanids come? He said: No, but even more serious and more significant than that: the Prophet has divorced his wives. [2]"
so this shows Ghassanids were starting a fuss with Muslims and trying to attack Muslims.
the rest is a genetic fallacy because he assumes just because Saudi arabia is muslim and has strict rules that must mean Islam is strict he assumes Muslims who did evil are right because they said Islam says so. which is a Genetic fallacy and is a completely idiotic argument and it is very embarrasing

as for the second video. Let us look at what he says
So as for his claim against Mohammed hijab. now he says that mountains had a process of formation. Okay but this doesnt disprove anything just because there is a process it doesnt disprove a creator at all. Godless Cranium is using a major Fallacy it is appeal to the stone he said this claim is absurd without showing us how and just linking to a process of formation. a Process simply proves a creator more because a designer is needed to process all of these. just because a car engine goes through process it does not mean a designer does not exist it proves a designer exists.
now to the argument at hand Godless cranium continues to dodge the argument and ignore with the 9000 god claim. he says There are other Gods why should i believe in yours? this are 2 fallacies one is cherry picking because Mohammed Hijab clearly quoted verses that no other book hold and this is also a Continuum fallacy just because Mohammed Hijab was imprecise and didnt show how it was only 1 god he tried to improperly create a argument by saying 'how do I believe on yours?" and it shows a fallacy in his reasoning which he will never fix because emotional and many fallacies are abundant in his videos which completely refute his argument so he lies low and cherrypicks certain words to play word games against islam and he cuts his opponents videos alot. so this completely refutes Godless Cranium and his pointless rants completely.
jzkAllah khairun

I believe Muslims should research into this,but its kind of like a thought by me
that there could be subliminal miracles in the Quran,like the voice tone,etc,especially in Surah rahman,its just uniquely soothing,and Allah SWT might've left something in the tone and prose,etc of its recitation.

So Hassan Radwan(A former Muslim,now atheist) has tried to imitate the Quran,with a Surah called Fa Qaf.
First of all,the NAME itself is an Error.
There is no Surah with words as a name. Except one
Now to the textual errors of it trying to imitate the Quran
The repetition of Words according to the creator of the Fake Surah is a repeated pattern in the Quran which is absolutely false
because the Quran has no repetition in the Quran at all,it was trying to imitate Surah ul Baqara I presume so lets check the text of Surah Baqara in arabic
and compare it to that of the false Surah.
So the starting of the Surah itself falsifies the false Surah called Fa qaf
It reads 'Zalik al Kitabu la rayba fee hudal lilmuthakeem" whereas the fake surahs starting verse is too small and undetailed compared to this
Arabic Quranic verse
'Khalakna al Dajaj Khalaka"
so the verse is too small,so the starting of the false Surah itself is wrong,so what can we expect with rest of the Surah? Oh yeah,the recitation
Abdullah Sameer uploaded a recitation to the fake Surah,and if you watch that recitation,you can see it turns out to sound more like singing rather than Reciting,and the words themselves make absolutely no sense.
And my last point on refuting this WHOLE Surah
is that it starts with the name of Allah SWT,whereas the challenge of the Quran says that call upon other than Allah if you are truthful,so the challenge has not been met at all,and it is a complete fail on terms of the Quran.
And the chapter itself,numerically fails to imitate the Numerical miracle of the Quranic Text,and is therefore,a fail in comparison to the Quran,and has completely refuted the Argument of the skeptic mind
but now you may be wondering,but what about the Other Surahs do they have this pattern as Hassan Radwan says?
well lets see the most well known Surahs,it failed to meet al Baqara
But lets check Surah al Rahman,even then it failed
So let me list some recitations of Abdulbasit abdussamad,Omar Hisham al Arabi and Mishary al Afasy and lets see if the recitation matches
So Surah Kahf by Omar Hisham al arabi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o2ODp3-Cag

Surah Al Rahman by Abdulbasit abdussamad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDel6KoYvgU

And Surah al Anfal by Mishary al Afasy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD5BfVcChYA

So by the whole text of the fake Surah,compared to actual Surahs in the Quran,the fake Surah fails to meet any challenge of any Surah and failed to imitate any other Surah in the Quran textually,and has commited many grammatical Arabic errors in its text,like using unknown words to the arabic language,and also has ended up with no knowledge of the challenge itself,and has broken a rule of the challenge,by copying a text and messing with some certain words, and calling upon Allah,
and is therefore
A FAIL and is completely refuted by me as it clearly holds no weight against the Quran
JazakAllah Khairun.