Answering Christianity Research Center

Atheists have gone to an all time low when it comes to disproving Islam,their new excuse against Islam is Noahs ark,and how its waves werent possible
Now let me demonstrate how those waves were possible and how other Lands also had them

So in Lituya bay the tsunami was 1,720 feet tall
how tall is that? 524 metres which is the size of a normal mountain
as seen in this picture:


so by this we can conclude the flood is possible,but however,now they will say this was a rare phenomena. No it wasnt because there were many tsunamis before it which were the size of a cliff.
The Unzen Tsunami which was 100 meters

The Eltanin impact which was around 200 meters
The vajont dam tsunami which was around 250 meters

so as we can see that these floods were possible so we can conclude the Flood of Noah did indeed most possibly happen.

Now about the Ark and the flood itself,it is a possibility but did it really happen? is there archaelogical proof it happened?
Well according to Charles Leonard Woolley(A archaeologist) he had this to say in his book
" . . . by the time I had written up my notes was quite convinced of what it all meant; but I wanted to see whether others would come to the same conclusion. So I brought up two of my staff and, after pointing out the facts, asked for their explanation. They did not know what to say. My wife came along and looked and was asked the same question, and she turned away remarking casually, "Well, of course, it's the Flood."

[1954, p. 27]"

And this isnt the only proof they also uncovered another one in Mesopotamia(modern day iraq.)
Within a few years, excavations of a third Mesopotamian site, Shuruppak, also uncovered a flood stratum (Schmidt, 1931). It is of particular interest because, according to the Mesopotamian legend, Shuruppak was the home of Ziusudra, the Sumerian Noah. (The Sumerian Ziusudra means "life of long days." The Akkadian equivalent, Utnapishtim, is "he found life," while the alternative Atra-hasis means "exceedingly wise.") This flood level separated late Protoliterate and Early Dynastic I remains and dates from around 2950 to 2850 BCE. Perhaps, but not certainly, the Shuruppak flood may be equated with the earliest flood at Kish. No other Mesopotamian sites have produced flood remains of significance (Mallowan, 1964).

So as we can see that Noah was indeed there and there was infact a flood, they also found bodies referring to it as so
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2000/sep/14/internationalnews.archaeology

So we can see by this that Noahs ark did indeed exist with complete certainty. and therefore disproves the whole Atheist narrative.

Firdt of all,Kaaba isnt a black cuhe it used to be multicolored in abbasid times,once it was completely white too,you see the actual color of the kaaba is sand-orangish behind those curtains,so the argument doesnt stand

Point 1 is Biased as  it shows no source,so it is a assertion.

Point 2,is a lie in many cases,first of all,even the Bible was compiled throughout time,why do we have books of John,matthew,etc? As for Quran,you see Quran was compiled in Papers and leathers back in the day,so thats why it took a while to compile into the compiled Quran we have today.
zuhri's report is unauthentic as it has no source,and whar about Ali R.A? WHO KNEW the whole Quran,what about Aisha the wife of the Prophet who had finished the whole Quran to? What about Hasan and Hussein R.A,rubbish point by christians,as usual,as for the last things he said,FALSE what about the Birmingham Quran manuscript which is between 568-648(around 628),even non muslim sources disagree wih his point,

Point 3

WHAT?! HOW DOES THAT VERSE HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH SLAVERY?!
For the one who was a slave when called to faith in the Lord is the Lord's freed person; similarly, the one who was free when called is Christ's slave. 1 corinthians 7;22,does this mean The Bible promotes slavery too?! Rubbish point,
Thomas Jeffersons war WAS NOT ANTI ISLAMIC,it was civil,the quote is false too,and nor had Thomas Jefferskn even read the Quran,Thomas Jefferson had this to say "Nor Pagan Nor Muhammadan(Muslim) Nor a jew,ought to be excluded from thr civil right of the commonwealth because of his religion"-Thomas Jefferson

Point 4,assertion,no proof

?? Where are these 26 Qurans? whats the video? if its DontConvert2Islam
Watch Yahya Snow's refutation on him,if its Jay smith,he doesn't even show the text.

i believe he just reads Quran like a textbook rather than a text full of mindblowing analogies that noone from 1400 years ago could know

LLOOLL the Bible says anyone who questions Jesus will be killed

QURAN however says this

Surah 10:94

And if thou (Muhammad) art in doubt concerning that which We reveal unto thee, then question those who read the Scripture (that was) before thee. Verily the Truth from thy Lord hath come unto thee. So be not thou of the waverers.

Surah 16:43

And We sent not (as Our messengers) before thee other than men whom We inspired - Ask the followers of the Remembrance if ye know not


AND as for Quran 5:101-2

Some people questioned the Prophet (pbuh) only to mock him. "People before you" asked such questions and they were given answers. They did not believe the answers, so they became disbelievers because of that. This occurred because these rulings were made plain to them, yet they did not benefit at all from that, for they asked about these things not to gain guidance, but only to mock and defy.

The following Hadith states the reason for the revelation of that Ayah:

The Prophet (ﷺ) delivered a sermon the like of which I had never heard before. He said, "If you but knew what I know then you would have laughed little and wept much." On hearing that, the companions of the Prophet (ﷺ) covered their faces and the sound of their weeping was heard. A man said, "Who is my father?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "So-and-so." So this Verse was revealed: "Ask not about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble." (5.101)

-Bukhari Book 65 Hadith 4621

Tafsir of Ibn Kathir also mentions the following incident to have happened before the revelation of that Ayah. This Hadith tells more about the context of that Ayah:

The Prophet (ﷺ) came out after the sun had declined and offered the Zuhr prayer (in congregation). After finishing it with Taslim, he stood on the pulpit and mentioned the Hour and mentioned there would happen great events before it. Then he said, "Whoever wants to ask me any question, may do so, for by Allah, you will not ask me about anything but I will inform you of its answer as long as I am at this place of mine." On this, the Ansar wept violently, and Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) kept on saying, "Ask Me! " Then a man got up and asked, ''Where will my entrance be, O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "(You will go to) the Fire." Then Abdullah bin Hudhaifa got up and asked, "Who is my father, O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)?" The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, "Your father is Hudhaifa." The Prophet (ﷺ) then kept on saying (angrily), "Ask me! Ask me!"Umar then knelt on his knees and said, "We have accepted Allah as our Lord and Islam as our religion and Muhammad as an Apostle." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) became quiet when `Umar said that. Then Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "By Him in Whose Hand my life is, Paradise and Hell were displayed before me across this wall while I was praying, and I never saw such good and evil as I have seen today."

-Bukhari Book 96 Hadith 25

BUT THE BIBLE however says anyone who questions Jesus is to be killed in Luke 19:27

I must say. You're faith in Islam is extremely weak. What hes trefuting is a VIEW OF MIRACLES in the Quran not the miracle in general so hes refuting the view of brother NAK. His explanation isnt the only explanation. There are way more.