Answering Christianity Research Center

Assalamu alaikum everyone.

It's been a long time, hasn't it  .

Anyways, I have some advice for fellow Muslims. Please do not waste your time with this Ali Sina. 2 years ago, it took me a month to write a book that refutes his 11 claims. When I finally challenged him, he told me

"Sorry, but your book doesn't address any of my claims".

I mean, come on. I did not miss any claim he made, so I doubt he even read my book. So please, do not waste your time with this person (I shouldn't call him a person. Talking to a wall is better than talking to him).

Anyways, if you insist on refuting this person (or you are starting to have doubts about Islam because of this person) then here is my book (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzWbzcKrUFb0b2RXX3dsNEYzS28/view)

I hope this helps anyone.

muslimforever2012

https://www.ahlalhdeeth.com/vbe/showthread.php?t=18540

Assalamu alaikum everyone.

Sorry if I annoyed anyone. But I couldn't find an answer for this.

There were some people who were claiming that there was a contradiction in the Quran due to this:

Remember thou saidst to the Faithful: "Is it not enough for you that Allah should help you with three thousand angels (Specially) sent down?

(3:124)

and


Remember ye implored the assistance of your Lord, and He answered you: "I will assist you with a thousand of the angels, ranks on ranks."


(8:9)

Is there any way to respond?

Jazzakallah for answers.

Assalamu alaikum and Eid mubarak everyone.

I know I asked this before, but I just need this last answer. A Christian told me that he knows that marrying children were common but he told me that Muhammad was wrong in marrying Aisha because:

1. Aisha was 6 and she didn't hit puberty and couldn't consent. He told me that she probably didn't even know about marriage.
2. He said Muhammad's example was for all time and in this time child marriage is not appropriate.

I told him about the child marriages in the Bible but he said their example was not for all time.

Sorry if I disturbed anyone.

Thanks.

Assalamu alaikum.

I am a bit concerned about the translations of some Hadiths. For example in this hadith:

نَا أَبُو النُّعْمَانِ، مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْفَضْلِ حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ زَيْدٍ، عَنْ أَيُّوبَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، قَالَ أُتِيَ عَلِيٌّ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ بِزَنَادِقَةٍ فَأَحْرَقَهُمْ فَبَلَغَ ذَلِكَ ابْنَ عَبَّاسٍ فَقَالَ لَوْ كُنْتُ أَنَا لَمْ أُحْرِقْهُمْ لِنَهْىِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَلَقَتَلْتُهُمْ لِقَوْلِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏

"‏ مَنْ بَدَّلَ دِينَهُ فَاقْتُلُوهُ ‏"

Bukhari Volume 9, Book 84, Hadith 57

The word used here is zanadiqa, which means heretics. However, it was translated to English like this:

Narrated `Ikrima:

Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to `Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn `Abbas who said, "If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) forbade it, saying, 'Do not punish anybody with Allah's punishment (fire).' I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), 'Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'"

It should have been heretics, not atheists. Atheists reading this might think that he killed innocent atheists were killed.

Do you think that other hadiths have problems like these?

Assalamu alaikum.

I argued with a person on Faithfreedom and he said that Muhammad killed those who insulted him. So I want a good response.

Is there any Hadith where he forgave those who insulted him?

Thanks.

Assalamu alaikum.

I was reading Hadiths on bestiality when I noticed something weird:

Translation:  Whoever comes unto an animal, kill him and kill it with him.
Narrator:  Abu Huraira and Ibn Abbas.
Validity and Authentication:  Authentic and undisputed.
Reference:  Sahih Al-Jami'a, page or number: 5938.

Translation:  Whoever comes unto an animal, kill him and kill it with him.
Narrator:  Abdallah Ibn Abbas.
Validity and Authentication:  Authentic and undisputed.
Reference:  Mushkat Al-Masabeeh, page or number: 3509.

Translation:  Whoever goes in unto (has sex with in other words in Arabic) an animal, kill him and kill the animal.
Narrator:   Abdallah Ibn Abbas.
Validity and Authentication:  Chained by Amru bin Abu-Amru.  Both disputed it.  But Yahya bin Ma'een authenticated it.
Reference:   Nile Al-Awtar, page or number 7/288.

Translation:  Whoever you find unto (having sex with) an animal, kill him and kill the animal with him.
Narrator:  Abdallah Ibn Abbas.
Validity and Authentication:  Authentic and undisputed.
Reference:  Sahih Al-Tirmithi, page or number: 1455.

Translation:  Whoever you find unto (having sex with) an animal, kill him and kill the animal with him.
Narrator:  Abdallah Ibn Abbas.
Validity and Authentication:  Authentic and undisputed.
Reference:  Sahih Al-Jami'a, page or number: 6588.

Translation:  Whoever goes in unto (having sex with) an animal, kill him and kill the animal.
Narrator:  Abdallah Ibn Abbas.
Validity and Authentication:  Authentic and undisputed.
Reference:  Sahih Ibn Majaa, page or number: 2094.

Narrator:  Kill the doer and the one who is being done (i.e., two males having sodomy), and who goes in unto an animal.
Narrator:  Abdallah Ibn Abbas.
Validity and Authentication:  Authentic and undisputed.
Reference:  Sahih Al-Targheeb, page or number: 2423.


However, in Sunan Abu Dawood, here is what it said:

Book 38, Number 4449:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.

and:

Book 38, Number 4450:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:

There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.

Abu Dawood said that the second narration is more correct.

I don't understand. Can someone explain about multiple authentic Hadiths contradicting an authentic Hadith?

Thanks.

As salamu alaikum.

So we keep giving islamophobes evidence that child marriage was OK, but they STILL say NONONO MUHAMMAD IS A PEDO (astaghfirullah). So the only way to shut them up is to show them that the hadiths narrator was not reliable. However, when I did that, someone told me:

What a liar the most authentic sou said she was 9.

And he gave me a pdf refuting the theory: https://islamistruth.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/the-age-of-aishah_s-marriage-between-historians-and-hadith-scholars.pdf

Can someone help me please.

Thanks.