Answering Christianity Research Center

I've never about a book like this but I know a guy who is really good at recognizing weak narrators as well as fabricators, i wonder how he does that, maybe he's really knowledgeable on hadith studies BUT i have vague memories of him commenting that he uses an Arabic website for checking Hadiths if I'm not mistaken...I don't have his personal email but you can still ask him by commenting on his blog, he always reply most of the time....

http://azblogtalk.blogspot.com/?m=1

In case of anyone is having wrong ideas about me, i just stumbled across the video on a website which does research on hybrid animals...

Yeah it can get really boring....the problem is that the antagonists always use the same copy and pasted arguments again and again and it gets really boring for you to use the same refutations again and again to deal with them...it's kinda like you don't get the same hype when you first started doing this ...maybe you should take a pause and simply wait for a New Critic who at least brings up new arguments to rise up instead of dealing with plagiarism specialists such as Abdullah Sameer...

What really makes me worried is that although they are losing, their influence is growing, even in the country where i live...i've seen news report of idiots showing their support by raising ISIS flags on top of their house and then i realised it's getting worse when i started seeing one in my own little town...i've even seens lots and lots of graffitis showing support to extremist groups....when i think about it, the local scholars and imams are partly responsible of this because ever since these idiots started their offensive in 2014, i barely heard any Imam or scholar condemning them...it's as if they don't even care,i've never heard ISIS being condemned in daily islamic programs on the local radio because most of time they are too "busy" putting old grandpas with weird voices singing poems about the Prophet(Peace be upon him) in low quality sounds...these shows barely do anything productive...sigh....

Assalamualaikum,

 I just read the latest Issue of Dabiq....They make lengthy articles about wisdom and contemplation and on the same page they put bloody pictures of their attacks and i guess this is enough to prove how idiotic they are...i went on page 30 and the title was "Why we hate you and why we fight you" and all the reasons that they've written are mainly emotional with a tiny amount of Quranic verses which are as usual taken out of context...They mock the claim that Islam is a peaceful religion and calls muslims like us "Apostates" and what is really funny is that they don't even bring a single proof from the Quran and Hadiths to prove us wrong....what is even funnier is that they put pictures of kids who are apparently playing happily in the caliphate in order to attract sympathizers who wish to bring their kids and i'm pretty sure little do these sympathizers know about the amount of child soldiers that have been recruited and judging from the amount of territory and fighters that these idiots have lost, there is a high chance that these kids are on the frontline...

Hello dear brother Submit ,

Thanks for replying bro, Yeah the Father is indeed a dinstinct figure and i'm pretty sure this is what Mr Matt believes judging from his arguments which he uses in his debates.The problem with Hypostatic Union is that it gives rise to more questions and it can also be self contradictory sometimes.Yeah maybe you're correct about the "split personalities" issue but the problem still remains due to Mr Matt's own explanation of Hypostatic Union....let me quote something from Mr Matt's explanation again...

"He is fully God and fully man (Col. 2:9), thus, He has two natures: God and man. He is not half God and half man. He is 100% God and 100% man. He NEVER lost His divinity"

"He continued to exist as God when He became a man and ADDED human nature to Himself (Phil. 2:5-11)"

"Therefore, there is a "UNION in one person of a FULL human nature and a FULL divine nature."

So if i'm not rushing too much to a conclusion which i think is not the case, then taking Mr Matt's explanation of Hypostatic Union into context, we can see that Jesus(peace be upon him) was supposed to have retained his "godly" knowledge and attributes right?

On top of that according to Trinitarians, Jesus did infact know about his nature as he allegedly "claimed" to be "god" and obviously i guess you do know that they try to prove that by using the BIBLE itself....so i don't think there was any "split personalities" issue with Jesus bro...

So the same question still remains....why didn't Jesus know the time of his return?

I'm not sure about the swapping switch by the way, maybe you're right but somehow i think it still contradicts Trinitarian beliefs of Jesus' knowledge about his nature and also the Hypostatic Union claim...

Thanks a lot for trying to help by the way, i really appreciate it, thank you bro

Assalamualaikum guys,

"Hypostatic Union", have you guys ever heard of this term? I was reading articles on CARM.org and i came across an article in which Mr Matt was using this argument to explain why Jesus(peace be upon Him) didn't know the time of his return.Hypostatic Union simply means that Jesus had TWO natures, His "divine" one and the "human" one.I've seen that Sami Zaatari already refuted his article but I would like to ask one question.So basically i would like to quote the words of Mr Matt which he used to explain Hypostatic Union on his website...

"Hypostatic Union is the union of the two natures (Divine and human) in the person of Jesus. Jesus is God in flesh (John 1:1, 14, 10:30-33, 20:28, Phil. 2:5-8, Heb. 1:8). He is fully God and fully man (Col. 2:9), thus, He has two natures: God and man. He is not half God and half man. He is 100% God and 100% man. He never lost His divinity. He continued to exist as God when He became a man and added human nature to Himself (Phil. 2:5-11). Therefore, there is a "union in one person of a full human nature and a full divine nature."

Did you guys notice some really important things which he said about the nature of Jesus? Let me quote it again...


 "He is 100% God and 100% man"

"He NEVER lost his divinity"

"He CONTINUED to exist as God when he became a Man"

"Full human nature and full divine nature"

So my question is(using the Hypostatic Union logic of course), if Jesus never lost his "divinity", he was still "100%" God and if he still had his "Full divine nature", this means he still retained his "divine wisdom and knowledge" when he became human right? Then how on earth he didn't know the time of his return?

One his article Mr Matt says....

"Before Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection He said the Father alone knew the day and hour of His return.  It wasn't until after Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection that omniscience was attributed to Jesus."

My question is, how on earth was Jesus granted omniscience only after his crucifixion and resurrection when in His own explanation of "Hypostatic Union" he said that...

"He is 100% God and 100% Man"

"He NEVER lost his divinity"

"He CONTINUED to exist as God when he became a Man"

"Full human nature and full divine nature"

So using the Hypostatic Union logic, Isn't Jesus supposed to retain his "Omniscience" attribute?

Did you bring up the point about the "Treatment of Slaves" during your debate?