Answering Christianity Research Center

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/01/2011112104142751917.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4OI0GUCI_A&noredirect=1

Don't say "No Bin Laden" because America gave Bin Laden 6 bill from 1989 to 1992. Religion was used as an excuse.
Don't say "No Holocaust" because America sponsored the 3rd Reich and was spoonfeeding Hitler throughout the entire WWII. Hitler used religion as an excuse to recruit Nazis. Hindu swastika, Iron cross, etc.
Don't say "No homeless Palestinians" because America is breastfeeding Israel, this will really keep the war going for a while. They just misinterpreted the bible and made the Jews think their messiah will return them Israel. They STILL believe they will get Israel back. Again, ruled by a higher power (the Zionists).
The CIA trained terrorists look it up on BBC.
Whenever the US stops funding someone, they mysteriously die (Hitler's suicide leaving only a blown skull, Bin Laden's death and body thrown in the ocean, etc.)

" I was watching the Towers, and though I wasn't the closest
I saw them crumble to the Earth like they was full of explosives"
(Felipe Andres Coronel)

In fact, BBC, Fox News, etc, you know, the big guys, they reported the collapse of the towers 20 minutes before it happened. The underdogs of the media, the unpopular channels, all reported that "the third explosion caused the collapse"

More here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQfL-KYpoyI

...except for the 96% that aren't.

How many U.S civilians have been killed by Muslims since 9/11?
ZERO.

If Br. Osama Abdullah and the many eye witnesses who said the "WTC came down like it was a pack of explosives" are correct, and denying the 1% possibility that Muslims did 9/11, Muslims have killed ZERO U.S civilians for the last thirty years. Without 9/11, Bush had no excuse to declare the war of terror. How many people died in the wars justified by 9/11? 2,500,000!
Source: The FBI website http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05



What about the rest of the world? Muslims account for 0.4% of global terrorism according to a Europol report.
For 2007:



2006:



For 2008:



(According to the report, there was 1 “Islamist attack” in the UK in 2008, which was omitted in the table above.  It has been included in the bar graph below.)

Just glancing at those tables is enough to know how absurd it is to claim that “all terrorists are Muslims.”  That statement is nowhere near the truth.  If we compile the data, it comes out to this:



Source: http://www.europol.europa.eu/publications/EU_Terrorism_Situation_and_Trend_Report_TE-SAT/TESAT2009.pdf

On p.7, the 2009 Europol report concludes:

    Islamist terrorism is still perceived as being the biggest threat worldwide, despite the fact that the EU only faced one Islamist terrorist attack in 2008.  This bomb attack took place in the UK…Separatist terrorism remains the terrorism area which affects the EU most. This includes Basque separatist terrorism in Spain and France, and Corsican terrorism in France…Past contacts between ETA and the FARC illustrate the fact that also separatist terrorist organizations seek cooperation partners outside the EU on the basis of common interests.  In the UK, dissident Irish republican groups, principally the RIRA and the CIRA, and other paramilitary groups may continue to engage in crime and violence.

Professed Muslim, meaning even if one says he is a Muslim, but he is not, you can still not call him a kaafir as an instruction here:

Quran 4:94 - ...Do not accuse anyone who claims himself to be a Muslim of disbelief just for worldly gains.

But let's say they ARE in fact, polytheists. Can we call them names?

Do not say crude words to those who call upon other than Allah, lest they use crude words about Allah in revenge without knowledge. As such we have made the actions of each nation seem pleasing. To their Lord they shall return, and He will inform them of that they were doing. ‌[6:108]

 Volume 8, Book 73, Number 125d:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah's Apostle said, "If a man says to his brother, O Kafir (disbeliever)!' Then surely one of them is such. "

Calling another Muslim a kaafir has been listed by scholars as The Fastest Way to Leave Islam

"Whoever attributes kufr [unbelief] to a believer, he is like his murderer.'' (Tirmizi, ch. Iman (Faith); see Arabic-Urdu edition cited earlier, vol. ii, p. 213. See also Bukhari, Book of Ethics; Book 78, ch. 44)

"Nothing expels a man from faith except the denial of that by which he entered into it [i.e. the Kalima].'' (Majma` az-Zawa'id, vol. i, p. 43)

In the hadith Ibn Umar related that the Holy Prophet said: If a Muslim calls another kafir, then if he is a kafir let it be so; otherwise, he [the caller] is himself a kafir.'' (Abu Dawud, Book of Sunna, edition published by Quran Mahal, Karachi, vol. iii, p. 484)

 Abu Zarr reported that the Holy Prophet said: No man accuses another man of being a sinner, or of being a kafir, but it reflects back on him if the other is not as he called him.'' (Bukhari, Book of Ethics; Book 78, ch. 44)

"Withhold [your tongues] from those who say `There is no god but Allah' --- do not call them kafir. Whoever calls a reciter of `There is no god but Allah' as a kafir, is nearer to being a kafir himself.'' (Tabarani, reported from Ibn Umar)

Call not the people of your Qibla [i.e. those who face the Ka`ba in Makka for prayer] as kafir.'' (Al-Nihaya of Ibn Athir, vol. iv, p. 187)

"And among the doctrines of the Ahl as-Sunna is that none of the people of the Qibla can be called kafir.'' (Sharh `Aqa'id Nasfi, p. 121)

 "He did not call as kafir anyone from among the people of the Qibla.'' (Sharh Mawaqif, fifth part)

 He said: "Nothing expels a man from faith except the denial of that which made him enter it.'' (Rad al-Mukhtar, vol. iii, p. 310)

"It is extremely serious to expel a Muslim from the faith.''(Sharh Shifa, vol. ii, p. 500)

"A ruling of takfir against a Muslim should not be given if it is possible to interpret his words in a favourable manner.'' (Rad al-Mukhtar, Book of Jihad, ch. on Apostasy)

"As for statements of takfir found in books of rulings (fatwa), these are not proof if the authors are unknown and the arguments are missing, because in matters of faith, beliefs depend on conclusive proof, and the takfir of a Muslim is attended with troubles of all sorts.'' (Sharh Fiqh Akbar, by Mulla Ali Qari)

Allama Sayyid Jalal-ud-Din wrote: "The takfir of people of the Qibla is itself an act of unbelief.'' (Dala'il al-Masa'il)

Ibn Abu Hamra, a saint, wrote: "It has already been stated that the rule of the Ahl Sunna is that they do not call kafir, or consider as going to hell eternally, anyone who is of the people of the Qibla.''

"The Imams have made it clear that if there is any ground for not issuing takfir, a ruling of takfir should not be made, even if that ground is weak.'' (Raf al-ishtiba `an `ibarat al-ishtiba, p. 4, published in Egypt)

"Some prejudiced persons from the Asharis call the Hanbalis as kafir, and some Hanbalis call the Asharis as kafir. But their calling each other kafir is not right because the belief of the trustworthy Imams of the Hanafis, Shafi`is, Hanbalis, and the Asharis, is that none of the people of the Qibla can be called a kafir.'' (Miftah Dar as-Sa`ada wa Misbak as-Sayyida, vol i, p. 46)

"The generality of the theologians and the jurists are agreed that none of the people of the Qibla can be called a kafir.'' (Al-Mawaqif, printed in Cairo, p. 600)

The famous eighteenth century saint of Delhi, Khawaja Mir Dard (d. 1785 C.E.), wrote: "We do not call kafir anyone of the people of the Qibla, even though he may be following falsehood or novel beliefs in most matters, because the acceptance of the oneness of God, and the affirmation of the prophethood of Muhammad, and the turning to the Qibla, do not expel them from faith as such. So he would be of those who follow later inventions and falsehood from among the Muslims. The Holy Prophet said: `Withhold in the matter of the people of the Qibla, that you do not call them kafir'.'' (Ilm al-Kitab, p. 75)...

I was looking at the top 10 genocides:
1) Mao - Atheist
2) Stalin - Atheist
3) Hitler - Said he was a believer to the public, but in secret meetings confessed to hating all religions
4) Pol Pot - Atheist
...
Where are the Muslims/Christians???

Define terrorism: The systematic use of terror, often violent, especially as a means of coercion.

Define Coercion: the act of compelling by force of authority.

Qur'an 2:256 - There is no compulsion in the religion

Matthew 5:44 - Love thy enemies

So it is illogical to link terrorism with religion. Religion does not compel by force or authority. It is the governments that do so.