Answering Christianity Research Center

So let me be a bit clear here. Atheism is a manipulative and disgustful ideology.
You see the things I've noticed about Atheists
is they really like to target the teenagers
like me and other teenagers,or maybe even you the one reading this,are their target of manipulation,They always target the weaker opponents,
for example if a Teenager has mental Issues,the atheist tries his hardest to Make the teenager doubt Islam due to his issues
Basically manipulating the emotions to fit a sick Agenda, and this seems like a very,very disgustful thing to me

I feel bad for the atheist Teenagers,because just to know how they've been harshened and their emotions have been manipulated to convert to a false ideology,is just sad to me.

So this is why I believe us teenagers,should atleast get into the basic fallacies in Philosophy to recognize how these Atheists are manipulating us,because really this is something,us Muslim youth should really recognize,there are people doubting Islam,because they have a Mental issue,like Autism and they blame Allah for it due to Atheists manipulating them

The question I wanna ask you is this
Who is the most merciful? and who should we believe in?

Allah,the most merciful,the kind,the supplier of all your resources and my resourhces

Or the Atheist? the one who blames Allah for things,and manipulates the weak for an evil,sick Agenda.

I mean I know one convert,who has had ALL HER details leaked online
ONLY because she left atheism for Islam
and was taken out of her manipulation
The thing is,our Muslim scholars,I believe are under-respected
Because the way they speak,they never try to manipulate us
all they do is read from the sources,and then they try to relate to us and show us how this source can help our lives
And we have the choice to either reject their advice or accept it
so there is no manipulation,we have free will
But for the atheist,there is no free will,he's forced to believe in this manipulative way that if he gets out of this he'll be insulted and even killed,I know some teenagers receiving death threats because they didnt accept atheism.

So this is why I believe us as Muslims should start to take our youth back from this disgusting Ideology,
because Islam tells us,to guide with actions and kindness
whereas Atheism you speak roughly to people,and manipulate their emotions
for your own sick agenda
And I really believe some Teenagers should start to atleast get into the basic fallacies of philosophy
so when they are speaking to the atheist,they instantly realize they are being manipulated
from their emotions.

and this is my opinion of the new atheists.

So you remember Dan Gibson right? Mecca is not the Qibla,etc,etc all these claims

So lets go through his claims one by one
1:The writings of the Quran are similar to Petra and not Mecca

I digress,they found an ancient tablet in Asham,southern area of Mecca,
This tablet with a Quran-like writing.


2: Mecca is not an ancient historical site

Well I disagree again,because if you look at the ancient land of Asham,southern Mecca that is,you'll find ancient houses,etc,etc so this disproves Dan Gibson again.

3:Makkah was not a trade route

I already disproved with maps of the Incense route and silk road route.

4:Makkah is not mentioned in the Quran.

Already disproved it,Kaaba is mentioned in the Quran,only found in Makkah,not in Petra.

5:Makkah is not where Mosques are pointing in the ancient world

Already disproved many major Muslims.

Is it haram to backbite,if you're backbiting about yourself?

I want to really answer some Muslims with doubts which are philosophical or something like "how do I know God exists?"
Needs contemplation,and these are really normal doubts in the mind of Muslims and you'll be able to come up with good and very straightforward Answers to these questions

So I'd advise people to spend atleast 30 minutes to contemplate.

So there has been this atheist "Godless cranium" who has been trying to demean Islam and insult Islam. and he has specifically attacked Mohammed Hijab with 2 videos. Both of them being refuted here.
so his first video is about Violence in Islam and trying desperately to refute Mohammed Hijabs arguments against such a claim.
so this video shows Godless cranium Quoting verse 8:12 but once you look at the context. the verse says
8:19 "If you [disbelievers] seek the victory – the defeat has come to you. And if you desist [from hostilities], it is best for you; but if you return [to war], We will return, and never will you be availed by your [large] company at all, even if it should increase; and [that is] because Allah is with the believers."
then he goes on to quote
9:29
but the context of 9:29 is in Historical sources seen as such
"He (Hadrat ‘Umar further) said: I had a companion from the Ansar and, we used to remain in the company of the Messenger turn by turn. He remained there for a day while I remained there on the other day, and he brought me the news about the revelation and other (matter), and I brought him (the news) like this. And we discussed that the Ghassanids were shoeing the horses in order to attack us. Id y companion once attended (the Apostle). And then came to me at night and knocked at my door and called me, and I came out to him, and he said: A matter of great importance has happened. I said: What is that? Have the Ghassanids come? He said: No, but even more serious and more significant than that: the Prophet has divorced his wives. [2]"
so this shows Ghassanids were starting a fuss with Muslims and trying to attack Muslims.
the rest is a genetic fallacy because he assumes just because Saudi arabia is muslim and has strict rules that must mean Islam is strict he assumes Muslims who did evil are right because they said Islam says so. which is a Genetic fallacy and is a completely idiotic argument and it is very embarrasing

as for the second video. Let us look at what he says
So as for his claim against Mohammed hijab. now he says that mountains had a process of formation. Okay but this doesnt disprove anything just because there is a process it doesnt disprove a creator at all. Godless Cranium is using a major Fallacy it is appeal to the stone he said this claim is absurd without showing us how and just linking to a process of formation. a Process simply proves a creator more because a designer is needed to process all of these. just because a car engine goes through process it does not mean a designer does not exist it proves a designer exists.
now to the argument at hand Godless cranium continues to dodge the argument and ignore with the 9000 god claim. he says There are other Gods why should i believe in yours? this are 2 fallacies one is cherry picking because Mohammed Hijab clearly quoted verses that no other book hold and this is also a Continuum fallacy just because Mohammed Hijab was imprecise and didnt show how it was only 1 god he tried to improperly create a argument by saying 'how do I believe on yours?" and it shows a fallacy in his reasoning which he will never fix because emotional and many fallacies are abundant in his videos which completely refute his argument so he lies low and cherrypicks certain words to play word games against islam and he cuts his opponents videos alot. so this completely refutes Godless Cranium and his pointless rants completely.
jzkAllah khairun

So Hassan Radwan(A former Muslim,now atheist) has tried to imitate the Quran,with a Surah called Fa Qaf.
First of all,the NAME itself is an Error.
There is no Surah with words as a name. Except one
Now to the textual errors of it trying to imitate the Quran
The repetition of Words according to the creator of the Fake Surah is a repeated pattern in the Quran which is absolutely false
because the Quran has no repetition in the Quran at all,it was trying to imitate Surah ul Baqara I presume so lets check the text of Surah Baqara in arabic
and compare it to that of the false Surah.
So the starting of the Surah itself falsifies the false Surah called Fa qaf
It reads 'Zalik al Kitabu la rayba fee hudal lilmuthakeem" whereas the fake surahs starting verse is too small and undetailed compared to this
Arabic Quranic verse
'Khalakna al Dajaj Khalaka"
so the verse is too small,so the starting of the false Surah itself is wrong,so what can we expect with rest of the Surah? Oh yeah,the recitation
Abdullah Sameer uploaded a recitation to the fake Surah,and if you watch that recitation,you can see it turns out to sound more like singing rather than Reciting,and the words themselves make absolutely no sense.
And my last point on refuting this WHOLE Surah
is that it starts with the name of Allah SWT,whereas the challenge of the Quran says that call upon other than Allah if you are truthful,so the challenge has not been met at all,and it is a complete fail on terms of the Quran.
And the chapter itself,numerically fails to imitate the Numerical miracle of the Quranic Text,and is therefore,a fail in comparison to the Quran,and has completely refuted the Argument of the skeptic mind
but now you may be wondering,but what about the Other Surahs do they have this pattern as Hassan Radwan says?
well lets see the most well known Surahs,it failed to meet al Baqara
But lets check Surah al Rahman,even then it failed
So let me list some recitations of Abdulbasit abdussamad,Omar Hisham al Arabi and Mishary al Afasy and lets see if the recitation matches
So Surah Kahf by Omar Hisham al arabi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o2ODp3-Cag

Surah Al Rahman by Abdulbasit abdussamad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDel6KoYvgU

And Surah al Anfal by Mishary al Afasy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD5BfVcChYA

So by the whole text of the fake Surah,compared to actual Surahs in the Quran,the fake Surah fails to meet any challenge of any Surah and failed to imitate any other Surah in the Quran textually,and has commited many grammatical Arabic errors in its text,like using unknown words to the arabic language,and also has ended up with no knowledge of the challenge itself,and has broken a rule of the challenge,by copying a text and messing with some certain words, and calling upon Allah,
and is therefore
A FAIL and is completely refuted by me as it clearly holds no weight against the Quran
JazakAllah Khairun.

Atheists have gone to an all time low when it comes to disproving Islam,their new excuse against Islam is Noahs ark,and how its waves werent possible
Now let me demonstrate how those waves were possible and how other Lands also had them

So in Lituya bay the tsunami was 1,720 feet tall
how tall is that? 524 metres which is the size of a normal mountain
as seen in this picture:


so by this we can conclude the flood is possible,but however,now they will say this was a rare phenomena. No it wasnt because there were many tsunamis before it which were the size of a cliff.
The Unzen Tsunami which was 100 meters

The Eltanin impact which was around 200 meters
The vajont dam tsunami which was around 250 meters

so as we can see that these floods were possible so we can conclude the Flood of Noah did indeed most possibly happen.

Now about the Ark and the flood itself,it is a possibility but did it really happen? is there archaelogical proof it happened?
Well according to Charles Leonard Woolley(A archaeologist) he had this to say in his book
" . . . by the time I had written up my notes was quite convinced of what it all meant; but I wanted to see whether others would come to the same conclusion. So I brought up two of my staff and, after pointing out the facts, asked for their explanation. They did not know what to say. My wife came along and looked and was asked the same question, and she turned away remarking casually, "Well, of course, it's the Flood."

[1954, p. 27]"

And this isnt the only proof they also uncovered another one in Mesopotamia(modern day iraq.)
Within a few years, excavations of a third Mesopotamian site, Shuruppak, also uncovered a flood stratum (Schmidt, 1931). It is of particular interest because, according to the Mesopotamian legend, Shuruppak was the home of Ziusudra, the Sumerian Noah. (The Sumerian Ziusudra means "life of long days." The Akkadian equivalent, Utnapishtim, is "he found life," while the alternative Atra-hasis means "exceedingly wise.") This flood level separated late Protoliterate and Early Dynastic I remains and dates from around 2950 to 2850 BCE. Perhaps, but not certainly, the Shuruppak flood may be equated with the earliest flood at Kish. No other Mesopotamian sites have produced flood remains of significance (Mallowan, 1964).

So as we can see that Noah was indeed there and there was infact a flood, they also found bodies referring to it as so
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2000/sep/14/internationalnews.archaeology

So we can see by this that Noahs ark did indeed exist with complete certainty. and therefore disproves the whole Atheist narrative.