Was the word used Qeren which is similar to the word Quran

[Introvert98]

Is this true then that means Qeren means the evil horn the book of David is saying promotes blasphemy against God. I need to know if this was the right term used


Daniel speaks of a little horn that is differentiated from a man, yet having a man’s point of view, smaller than a man, being a book against which the BOOKS of Judgement are opened, which is given a mouth (recitation) full of boastful blasphemy against GOD and HIS Saints, and the Aramic word used there for horn is qeren.

[Introvert98]

Here is the full comment that was made the post was in support of Islam saying that waleed Shoebat was wwrong but here is the comment

Petros
June 3, 2010
The original Apocalypse of John undoubtedly used three shapes, and did not write them out as full numerical words. Only those who recieved oral Tardition as well as the Manuscript’s Copies could know what the symbols resembled numerically. Irenaeus was one such man. He didn’t understand it to refer to Nero, but said that that anitchrist had not yet been revealed.

Here is how the mistake of 616 for 666 occurred – the only way it could occur:
by the time of later copies, gematrical characters were falling into disuse by many, and the obsolete charcaters used for a couple of the numerics were being confused, so some recorded the words denoting what they rightly or wrongly thought the old symbols to refer to numerically. Since the original used the three characters, and did not limit their meaning to mere numerics, Shoebat’s observation concerning some traces of the original shapes copied out is most significant. It doesn’t matter how late some of them were copied (although they are not all late anyway).

The shapes are a little mis=shapen, and the line included over the middle character to denote special character use is in the perfect place.

Before muhammad, no Arab knew the name )allah which consists of four consonants )llh
What they actually knew was a three consonant word which all Arabs Christian, Jewish, or heathen used alike for GOD or for their subtitute for HIM:
)ILAH, consisting of )LH, and cognate with Hebrew
)ELOHIM and Aramaic )ALAHA
Some, without proof say these are cognate with Hebrew )EL

With the definite article prefixed, Arabic )ILAH becomes )al-)ILAH, being 5 consonants in all, with a very definite glottal break between the l of the definite article and the initial )alif of the word )ILAH. The numerical sum of the consonants of the articulated term, )al-)ILAH is 67, but around the year 600, muhammad began using the invented name )allah, whose munerical value is 66, and it is precisely the 66 portion of the three characters for 666 in the Apocalypse that resemble the new name that itself is numerically 66.

318 is a number representing JESUS, as expmained in the Epistle of Barnabas, and seen reflected in the number of Orthodox Bishops at the Council of Nicea (some of them were at odds over the question of an ordination that took place, that was linked to their arguments over the nature of origen’s apologetics, so some of them only counted the 270 on their side of the originelist controvery, who nonetheless agreed with them on the TRINITY and on Church Canons). The 18 part in Greek characters is said to initialize the NAME IESOUS, while the hundreds digit is shown to resemble the Cross, the Symbol of JESUS.

The tens and ones digits of 666 represent the name invented by a man, who wrote his own thoughts as if they were divine, and the hundreds digit looks like his jihad’s symbol. It doesn’t say the number isn’t a composite of name and mark, but speaks of both!

In Daniel, the statue erected as an idle (which the Hebrew word )elul expresses) was said to be 60 by 6 measures, and made about the year 600 BC. About 666 the quran gained mastery over a spreading arabic empire, which an ottoman empire later resembled and overshadowed about 666 years later yet.

If the original )ILAH is cognate with Hebrew )EL, then the initial )lif is vital to thr retention of the idential root in )ILAH. If lost, then one of only two necessary letters is lost, so that no root exists. But if the first two letters in )allah are taken for that root, then the second l is not in keeping with the proposed root, and makes the root )ll, like the Hebrew word for idle. If the first two letters remain the definite article, then what follows is only lah, and means nothing, or for her!

Before muhammad, names like (abdulah were using the form )ILAH, not )allah. Arabic and Aramaic Christians and Jews have never used )allah, but only Aramaic )ALAHA, having only a single L, or Arabic )ILAH, or the articulated )al-)ILAH.

No Semitic language uses a geminate L in any of the proposed )EL cognates. Even if in Arabic an exception were made, a geminate is never written using two L characters, but only by pointing a single character as geminate. Two L characters means two separate occurrences of L with a distainct break between them, yet is not equal to a glottal stop between them.

Arabic is supposed to be very precise with the average word – why would it be sloppier with an alleged divine name? And saying that )allah cannot be made plural or feminine is an arbitrary decision muhammad himself made, and neither an eternal law nor ancient convention.

To place a second L draws out an already existent root for emptiness, from which words for nothing and idle derive.

Daniel speaks of a little horn that is differentiated from a man, yet having a man’s point of view, smaller than a man, being a book against which the BOOKS of Judgement are opened, which is given a mouth (recitation) full of boastful blasphemy against GOD and HIS Saints, and the Aramic word used there for horn is qeren.

The numbers of years given, the over 1200 and the over 1300 hundred are to be added one after the other. The first ends with the taking of the Temple Mount by islam, the second is the nearly 1400 years of islam to it’s end in the near future.

The word about having “SOPHIA” (WISDOM) addressed to those in Churches that would one day be overwhelmed by the forming Turkish state, refers to the Church in their midst called Hagia Sophia, in which there remains an Icon high up in the air of Mary with her MAN-CHILD, where the sun comes in the windows and clothes her, high above the crescent moons of islam. The Congregation were forced into the wilderness, and the place is desolate, the Masses having ended there, in a museum or dessert state. Two witnesses are seen presenting the Church and the City. With that Woman being driven out, the charem was set up in the same city, the mother of whores, to which women of all nations were brought to be molested by the sultan (the satan) who ruled also over Pergamum.

The ottomans, as the arabs abmoinated and desolated the Church of St. Mary in Jerusalem, did so to the Lady there.

Just before this desolation, the last Christian emperor ro make a temporary dent in the sultan’s expansion was Michael. The antichrist had to overcome the Saints in war to get the dominion.

[QuranSearchCom]

As'salamu Alaikum,

Walid Shoebat is a fraud who fabricates nonsense to fool the ignorant.  So now Quran means horn?  Only a clown would claim this.  Quran, which means THE READ or THE REVEALED is derived from the root QARA', which means TO READ.  Qarn and/or Qeren means horn.  Qarn also means century (100 years).  Qiran means marriage.  Also, Qarana means compared.  But the words, Qarn and Qiran, have no relationship with Qara' or Quran.  They just sound similar.  This is like the English words:

1-  Exegesis and JESUS!  Can any doomed-to-Hell fool say that these words have the same root?

2-  Link and Ink.
3-  Cat and Catch.
4-  Dog and Dodge.
5-  Car and Carpet.
6-  Loud and Cloud.
7-  Profile and File.
8-  Swipe and Wipe.
9-  Troll and Roll.
10-  Smart and Art.

How about words that have multiple meanings and sounds:

1-  MINUTE.  (minit) means unit of time and (mine-yoot) means tiny.
2-  JOB.  (job) as jobs for work, and (jobe) for Prophet Job.
3-  Wind.  (wind) moving air, and (winde) for winding up or arriving.
4-  Contest.  (CON-test) competition, and (con-TEST) to dispute.
5-  Contract.  (CON-tract) for agreement, and (con-TRACT) shrink.
6-  Desert.  (DES-ert) arid region, and (de-SERT) to leave.
7-  Dove.  (Duv) a white bird that symbolizes love, and (Dove) jumped off.

Quran (Arabic letters without vowels: Q R A N) is not QARN or QEREN (Arabic letters without vowels: Q R N).  Quran has 4 letters and Qarn has 3.  Qiran also is made of Q R A N, but with different vowels than Quran.  Qarana is made of Q R N but with different vowel on the N than the one on Qarn.  Just because the Arabic Word Quran contains the letters Q R N it doesn't mean the two words are the same.  The examples above make this clear to the non-Arabic English speaker.

In English, we even have words that sound exactly the same (not that Quran and Qarn or Qeren sound exactly the same):

1-  TOO, and TWO, and TO.
2-  PRAY and PREY.
3-  ACCEPT and EXCEPT.
4-  AFFECT and EFFECT.
5-  THAN and THEN.
6-  WHERE and WERE.
7-  ONE and WON.
8-  RIGHT and WRITE.
9-  WAIT and WEIGHT.
10- SEE and SEA.
11- RED and READ.
12- CACHE and CASH.


Read or Ram?

When you read with your eyes, do you also ram with your horns?  Do you grow horns while reading?  What is the relationship between reading and horns?  This is basic Arabic!  The following links thoroughly refute the fraud Walid Shoebat:

www.answering-christianity.com/convert_christians.htm
www.answering-christianity.com/666.htm
www.answering-christianity.com/dajjal.htm
www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm



The Quran's STUNNING Miracles:

And to see the Glorious Quran's STUNNING Scientific and Numerical Miracles, visit:

www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#links
www.answering-christianity.com/100_percent_guarantee_that_quran_is_divine.htm

The doomed-to-Hell infidels have nothing but lies and noise to attack Islam.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

[submit]

If you look at anti-islam websites. Their website is only filled with contents by merely playing with Arabic words to make it referring to different words, apart from that they cant refute the teachings of Islam as its teachings comprise same covenant as that of Noahites and Israelites.

No nonsense about manifestation of God into human form on earth similar to all other foreign falsehood beliefs (ancient sumerian polytheism, Greek Hellenism etc).

[Shabeer1]

ACTUALLY WHO R HEAR THE VERSES FROM SATAN?

I WILL PROVE WITH BIBLE EVIDENCE:

Many Christian critics have alleged that the revelation received
by Muhammad (e) were, in fact, from the Satan himself. It has been
the endeavour of the Christian writers like C.D. Fander, Claire Tisdal,
Joshmach Dowell, John Gilchrist and G. Nehless to portray the
revelations received by Muhammad (e) as being the insinuations of
the Devil. They advocate the idea that it had been the attempt of the
Devil to confine man within the pitfalls of sin by way of denying the
cruicifixion of Jesus Christ and the atonement of sin through it, that
stands behind the verses of the Qur'an. Can the Devil infest the human
body? Can a person be afflicted with disease owing to his possession
by the Devil? Will a person possessed by the Devil have the experience
of revelation? Such discussions are irrelevant here. By the dictum of
the Bible, then, let us consider the disorders that manifest themselves
in the person possessed by the Devil :
1. Screaming aloud owing to the affliction of the brain (Mark 1:24,
Luke 9:39, John 10:20)
2. Suicidal tendency (Mathew 9,18:17, 15:32, Mark 5:13, Luke 8:33)
3. Tendency to walk naked (Luke 8:2, 8:35)
4. To be pushed aside by the Devil (Mathew 17:15, Mark 1:26, 9:18,
9:20, 9:26)
5. Dumbness (Mark 9:25, 9:32, 12:22, Luke 11:14)
6. Deafness (Mark 9:25)
7. Blindness (Mathew 12:22)
8. To see that which others do not and to know that which others
don’t (Mark 1:24, Luke 4:3, Mathew 8:29)
None of the symptoms of the one possessed by the Devil, which
are described in the Bible, is seen in the person of Muhammad (e).
One of the evidences cited by those who allege that Muhammad (pbuh)
was possessed by the Devil has been his own statement that the divine
revelation sometimes came to him in the form of the ringing of a bell
and that this form of revelation was the hardest for him. Another
evidence cited has been the saying of Aysha (r), the wife of the Prophet,
that she saw beads of perspiration on the forehead of the Prophet
when the revelation came upon him on a very cold day. Here, there is
an important question that is to be considered. Does the Bible say, in
any place, that the one possessed by the Devil feels the ringing of a
bell in his ears or that his forehead is dampened with the wetness of
perspiration even in extreme cold? If it does not, then what, indeed, is
the basis on which the followers of the Bible allege satanic possession
against the Prophet?
Those who say that the divine message received by the Prophet
was the production of a Devilish possession, are, in fact, actually
forced to say that their own holy men are themselves possessed by
the Devil.
‘St. Paul’ had been the one who had actively laboured to destroy
Jesus as well as the ideals that he propagated (Acts of the Apostles
9:1, 26:10, 8:1) as long as he remained on the earth, after which it was
that he came forward with the claim that Christ had appeared to him
in a vision. Observe the description in the Bible of the way in which he
had received this vision of Christ: “As he neared Damascus on his
journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. He
fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why
do you persecute me?’
‘Who are you, Lord ?’ Saul asked. ‘I am Jesus, whom you
are persecuting.’ He replied. ‘Now get up and go into the city,
and you will be told what you must do.’
The men travelling with Saul stood there speechless, they
heard the sound but did not see anyone. Saul got up from the
ground, but when he opened his eyes he could see nothing. So
they led him by the hand into Damascus. For three days he was
blind, and did not eat or drink anything.” (Acts of the Apostles
9:3-9)
We have seen that the Bible indicates the falling down to the
ground, seeing that which others do not see and hearing that which
others do not hear as being the symptoms of a devilish possession. In
the incident wherein Paul claimed that he saw Christ, he had
experienced all these symptoms too. But will the Christian world
accept it if it was now claimed that Paul himself had been possessed
of the Devil? The Christian critics will never be able to produce even
a single shred of evidence from the Bible to conclusively assert that
Muhammad (e) was possesed by the Devil. On the other hand,
however, it can be shown, using the Bible, that Paul, the real founder
of the present-day Christian faith, had been subjected to the
insinuations of the Satan. Then who is it, now, who was actually
possessed of by the Devil ?
Now, examine the very corner-stone of the Christian allegation
that the Qur'an had come to be written because of the Satanic influences
that moved Muhammad (e). After all, it has been only because of the
Qur'anic denunciation of the concept of salvation through the
crucifixion of Jesus Christ that the Qur'an has been alleged to be a
satanic creation. What, then, is the reality? Both Christians and
Muslims believe that Jesus was of a pure and unblemished character.
Both groups are agreed upon the fact that he had been appointed by
God Almighty Himself. Further still, both affirm that he was not
possessed by the Devil. If such is the case, then why should we not
compare the teachings of Jesus Christ with those of Paul and
Muhammad (e) in order to analyze as to who it was - Paul or
Muhammad (e) - who was afflicted by the insinuations of the Satan.
For any person in receipt of a revelation from the Devil must, of a
necessity, be an enemy of Jesus; going by the consideration that the
antagonist of a messenger from God will naturally be the antagonist
of the message that he conveys.
Jesus said: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the
Law or the prophets” (Mathew 5:17)
The Qur'an says, “It was We who revealed the Torah (to
Moses): therein was guidance and light.” (5:44)
“And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: ‘O Children
of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (Sent) to you, confirming
the Taurat (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of
messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad.’” (61:6)
Paul had written, “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the
Law.” (Galatians 3:13)
“By abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments
and regulations.” (Ephesians 2:15)
Jesus said that he came not to destroy the law; the Qur'an, too,
says the same. As for Paul, he contends that Jesus had come to save
the world from the law. Who indeed, is the one who recieved the
revelation of Satan ?
Jesus Christ had never taught that he was God. (Mark 12:29,
Mathew 4:10). The Qur'an, too, reiterates this beyond the shadow of
a doubt. (3:51). But Paul had stated thus, “Who, being in very nature
God, did not consider equality with, God something to be grasped.”
(Philippians 2:6) and “He is the image of the invisible God, the
first born over all creation.” (Colossians 1:15). Jesus had never
received any revelation that stated that he himself was God. Even if
he did receive such a revelation, he would certainly have made it
known. But Paul seems to have received a ‘revelation’ declaring Jesus
to be God. Whence, indeed, must that ‘revelation’ have proceeded ?
The Bible described the circumcision as a covenant which God
had made with Abraham. The Lord had instructed Abraham about the
circumcision as follows: “As for you, you must keep my covenant,
you and your descendants after you for the generation to come.’”
(Genesis 17:9-14). The Bible quotes God as having told Moses, “‘On
the eighth day the boy is to be circumcised.’” (Leviticus 12:3).
Jesus, too, had observed this divine commandment: “On the eighth
day, when it was time to circumcise him .....” (Luke 2:21) Jesus
had never instructed anyone against the circumcision. This had been
for the simple reason that he had never received such a revelation in
the first place. But observe what Paul says: “.... if you let yourselves
be circumcised Christ will be of no value to you at all.” (Galatians
5:2). Whence did Paul receive this ‘revelation’ ? Of a certainty, not
from God,if not, then where from indeed?
The major reason behind the allegation that Muhammad (e)
had his revelations from the Devil has been that the Qur'an refuted
the crucifixion and salvation of humanity through the sacrifice of a
single individual. There are numerous verses in the Qur'an wherein
Jesus and his mother have been praised and have found the most
reverential mention. It may also be remembered that Maryam has been
the only woman to be referred by name in the Qur'an. The Qur'an
further describes even the miracle wrought through Jesus which has
not been recorded in the Bible like his having breathed life into birds
of clay (3:49). The incident wherein the baby Jesus had spoken from
his cradle which the Qur'an describes (19:30) is not mentioned
anywhere in the Bible. There is nothing in the Qur'an that serve to
tarnish the lofty character of Jesus. Here it is especially relevant that
according to the Gospel of John, the first miracle of Christ had been
that he had produced wine at a marriage function in Canaan (John
2:1-11). There is, however, no such reference in the Qur'an.
The Biblical concept has been that “... anyone who is hung
on a tree is under God’s curse.” (Deuteronomy 21:23). The Jews
had thought that they had had Jesus accursed by way of impaling him
onto the cross. Paul, too, says the same thing. “Christ redeemed us
from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is
written: ‘Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.’” (Galatians
3:13). It follows from this that the crucifixion has only served to make
of Jesus an accursed person. But the Qur'an does not accept the idea
that Jesus had become so accursed for the sins of the whole world.
How can anyone believe that God never heard the prayer of Jesus
which he made in order that he be saved from the accursed wooden
cross (Mathew 29:39) without believing in the very rejection of divine
mercy to Jesus? The Qur'an, however, teaches that God had, by way
of saving Jesus from the accursed wooden cross, undermined the
conspiracy of the Jews. (4:157,158)
The Jews contend that Jesus had become accursed by way of
his being impaled upon the cross.
Paul contends that Jesus had become accursed by way of his
dying upon the cross.
The Qur'an contends that God saved Prophet Jesus from the
cross.
Which among these is the revelation of the Satan? Is it the one
which glorifies Jesus or is it the one which makes of him an accursed
person?
In short, therefore, the stark reality is that those who strive to
produce proofs to the effect that the Qur'an’s has been a satanic
revelation, have kept falling into the pitfalls of their own making.

[Shabeer1]

QURAN BEING A TRUE DIVINE SCRIPTURES FROM ALMIGHTY ALLHA:

4:82. Do they not then consider the Qur'ân carefully? Had it been from other than Allâh, they would surely have found therein much contradiction.
5: 68. Say (O Muhammad SAW) "O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! You have nothing (as regards guidance) till you act according to the Taurât (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel), and what has (now) been sent down to you from your Lord (the Qur'ân)." Verily, that which has been sent down to you (Muhammad SAW) from your Lord increases in many of them their obstinate rebellion and disbelief. So be not sorrowful over the people who disbelieve.
10: 37. And this Qur'ân is not such as could ever be produced by other than Allâh (Lord of the heavens and the earth), but it is a confirmation of (the revelation) which was before it [i.e. the Taurât (Torah), and the Injeel (Gospel), etc.], and a full explanation of the Book (i.e. laws and orders, etc, decreed for mankind) - wherein there is no doubt from the the Lord of the 'Alamîn (mankind, jinns,and all that exists).
5:16. Wherewith Allâh guides all those who seek His Good Pleasure to ways of peace, and He brings them out of darkness by His Will unto light and guides them to a Straight Way (Islâmic Monotheism).
25:66. Say: "It (this Qur'ân) has been sent down by Him (Allâh) (the Real Lord of the heavens and earth) Who knows the secret of the heavens and the earth. Truly, He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."
5:3………….This day, those who disbelieved have given up all hope of your religion, so fear them not, but fear Me. This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion. But as for him who is forced by severe hunger, with no inclination to sin (such can eat these above-mentioned meats), then surely, Allâh is Oft¬Forgiving, Most Merciful.
17: 9. Verily, this Qur'ân guides to that which is most just and right and gives glad tidings to the believers (in the Oneness of Allâh and His Messenger, Muhammad SAW, etc.). who work deeds of righteousness, that they shall have a great reward (Paradise).
54: 40, 54:32 ,54:22 and indeed, we have made the Qur'ân easy to understand and remember, then is there any that will remember (or receive admonition)?
17: 88. Say: "If the mankind and the jinns were together to produce the like of this Qur'ân, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they helped one another."
8: 32. And (remember) when they said: "O Allâh! If this (the Qur'ân) is indeed the truth (revealed) from You, then rain down stones on us from the sky or bring on us a painful torment."
4: 82. Do they not then consider the Qur'ân carefully? Had it been from other than Allâh, they would surely have found therein many contradictions.
5: 16. Wherewith Allâh guides all those who seek His Good Pleasure to ways of peace, and He brings them out of darkness by His Will unto light and guides them to a Straight Way
7: 203. And if you do not bring them a miracle [according to their (i.e. Quraish-pagans') proposal], they say: "Why have you not brought it?" Say: "I but follow what is revealed to me from my Lord. This (the Qur'ân) is nothing but evidences from your Lord, and a guidance and a mercy for a people who believe."
13: 39. Allâh blots out what He wills and confirms (what He wills). And with Him is the Mother of the Book (Al-Lauh Al-Mahfûz)
25: 6. Say: "It (this Qur'ân) has been sent down by Him (Allâh) (the Real Lord of the heavens and earth) Who knows the secret of the heavens and the earth. Truly, He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."
49. Nay, but they, the clear Ayât [i.e the description and the qualities of Prophet Muhammad SAW written like verses in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)] are preserved in the breasts of those who have been given knowledge (from the people of the Scriptures). And none but the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrongdoers, etc.) deny Our Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.).
50. And they say: "Why are not signs sent down to him from his Lord? Say: "The signs are only with Allâh, and I am only a plain warner."
51. Is it not sufficient for them that We have sent down to you the Book (the Qur'ân) which is recited to them? Verily, herein is mercy and a reminder (or an admonition) for a people who believe.
40: 2. The revelation of the Book (this Qur'ân) is from Allâh the All-Mighty, the All-Knower.
41: 2. A revelation from Allâh, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful.
41: 42. Falsehood cannot come to it from before it or behind it (it is) sent down by the All-Wise, Worthy of all praise (Allâh ÚÒ æ Ìá).
42: 17. It is Allâh Who has sent down the Book (the Qur'ân) in truth, and the Balance (i.e. to act justly). And what can make you know that perhaps the Hour is close at hand?
43: 3. We verily, have made it a Qur'ân in Arabic, that you may be able to understand (its meanings and its admonitions).
4. And Verily, it (this Qur'ân) is in the Mother of the Book (i.e. Al-Lauh Al-Mahfûz), before Us, indeed Exalted, full of Wisdom.
45: 2. The revelation of the Book (this Qur'ân) is from Allâh, the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.
46: 2. The revelation of the Book (this Qur'ân) is from Allâh, the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.
55: 1. The Most Beneficent (Allâh)! 2. Has taught (you mankind) the Qur'ân (by His Mercy).
56: 77. That (this) is indeed an honourable recital (the Noble Qur'ân).
78. In a Book well-guarded (with Allâh in the heaven i.e. Al-Lauh Al-Mahfûz).
79. Which (that Book with Allâh) none can touch but the purified (i.e. the angels).
80. A Revelation (this Qur'ân) from the Lord of the 'Alamîn (mankind, jinns and all that exists).
13: 11. For each (person), there are angels in succession, before and behind him. They guard him by the Command of Allâh. Verily! Allâh will not change the good condition of a people as long as they do not change their state of goodness themselves (by committing sins and by being ungrateful and disobedient to Allâh). But when Allâh wills a people's punishment, there can be no turning back of it, and they will find besides Him no protector.
 42:52, 45:16, 46:12, 47:20, 52:2-3, 57:16, 57:25, 57:26, 66:12, 74:31, 74:52, 98:1, 98:4, 98:6
Quran not from Satan:
81: 25. And it (the Qur'ân) is not the word of the outcast Shaitân (Satan).
26: 210. And it is not the Shayâtin (devils) who have brought it (this Qur'ân) down,
211. Neither would it suit them, nor they can (produce it).
212. Verily, they have been removed far from hearing it.