1) I haven't seen for myself so I ask : Is it true ? If true , is it something they all agreed on or is it the act of individual soldiers ? Because there are cases of certain soldiers recieving punishment for acts they did . Heck , one of their officers was executed for terrorizing people and robbing them of their belongings thus becoming what Quran describes
5:33 Indeed, the penalty for those who
wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,
Also , is it in a full context ? Because you might think they're being cruel to someone yet you don't know what that person did . Shall I remind everyone how the brainwashed object on executing the Jews of Quraiza completely forgetting that they betrayed Muslims and aided their enemies against them ?
2) You know , it's funny . The shia say that the state is made by the "Wahabists" - which isn't a sect to begin with - , the Saudis say it's made by Iran , some say it's made by the US , some say it's made by the Jews , some say it's made by Asad - who doesn't match his name in a single thing - and some even say it's made by Al-Malki . How can they be made by all of those who wage war against them ? Need I remind you all of this sign of Quran ? :
49:6 O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful.
So while I don't claim they're completely right , I am definitely not going to stand on the side of complete devils against them ! And I'm not going to believe all and any thing said against them by their enemies especially since a load of sickening lies were made and got exposed . Example ? The hate against them reached to the degree that they claim the state covers the udders of cattls so men are not aroused ! Who with a shred of logic believes such a thing on the fly without investigating ?!
3) Let me be honest Osama , I disagree with you and some members here in major things . It isn't like the differences of "Fiqh" between scholars where no one accuses the other of anything . These are fundamental things . For instance , you don't mind someone being insulting Allah , his religion , his prophets , or the companions . Heck , you did it yourself . Had someone said a filthy word about your mother , you would never say "He called my mother [bleep]" , that would be beyond stupid . So how come it's OK with the lord of your mother and all the creation ? As for the matter of rejecting Hadith because it "doesn't match Quran" , many have said that to the degree that they claimed Jews and Christians are right to stay on their religion - AFTER the message of Islam reaches them - , Christ peace upon him won't return , Yajuj and Majuj are volcanos , and so many other ridiculous and asinine statements . They always use the lame excuse of "Scholars are not perfect" as if THEY are when they discovered something the entire nation was ignorant of all these centuries . Had they asked about what they didn't understand , it would have been better , but it's mostly arrogance as the lord said :
10:39 Rather, they have denied that which they encompass not in knowledge and whose interpretation has not yet come to them. Thus did those before them deny. Then observe how was the end of the wrongdoers.
Many claim they only accept narrations that agree with Quran . Had they stopped and asked themselves "Maybe I'm misunderstanding something" they would have saved us a load of commotion . Hilariously , they object on the very same method Quran reached us .
??
? ?
??
??
