Assalamun Alaikum Dawud
They actually did wait for two Messiahs. If you read the prophecy of Daniel 9 it predicts our beloved Prophet Muhammad. He is called the Son of Man.
Even in the New Testament according to Bishop Keldani Jesus Christ used this title as referring to a third person. Christ says that the Son of Man will be coming from the East. In the Bible east is referred to the Arabs. Prophet Muhammad came from the Arab nation. Christ never claimed that title for himself. Christ maybe the son of man but not the "Son of Man" of Daniel 9 which the jews expected. Christ says that the Son of Man will come with the league of angels. It is very similar to the prophecy of Daniel 9. So from this we can see that Christ did not use the title for himself since Christ knew very well who the Son of Man is and Christ didn't fulfill the prophecy of Daniel 9.
Thank you
Mohamed Saif
i have not seen convincing evidence that son of man efers to muhammad
lok this:
Luke 9:22 And he(jesus) said, "The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, and he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life."i dont think son of man refers to muhammad, according t obible it refers to jesus, but this is catastrophic error
why beacuse Jesus is not son of any man, he had no father, while title son of Man is linguistical contradiction if it refers to jesus since he had no father.
that is a problem which christians need to solve.