Muhammad was not from Mecca, but Petra.

[AMuslimDude213]

[AMuslimDude213]

[AMuslimDude213]

Also

http://www.muslimheritage.com/article/from-petra-back-to-makka

[AMuslimDude213]

[AMuslimDude213]

[AMuslimDude213]

Okay,enough of this BS that NWO cleanse keeps putting out instead of sufficient Proof.

Ima go do things more relevant rather than somehow History changing courses and somehow all the letters of Muhammad SAW which Mention Mecca are false,and somehow all the Houses,places,etc and the area the Quran mentions that Fits Mecca is not there in the Quran(even though the Only place with a Macoraba/Kaaba is in Mecca,and no other ancient temple is there in Saudi arabia)

[AhmadFarooq]

[submit]

[Albarra]

If Medinah did not exist during Muhammad's life, then where is his funeral? Petra?

[AMuslimDude213]

Ahh this old argument that I refuted it was actually fun to dig down on ancient maps and finally find several that were showing Mecca to be a city.

and that Incense route took me a week and hours of research to finally find xD

Thing is. Mecca had historical sites. REALLY ANCIENT ONES proving Muhammad SAWs existence there. but they were all destroyed thanks to the Saudi government.
and also another thing to consider is in the Maps the area Mecca is we see the sign of a city that Ptolemy used to draw to signify a significant place.

And another historical thing to consider would be that many cities werent well known in the ancient world. for eg. there are some maps where Jerusalem isnt there. for eg. Some Maps show America doesnt exist.

So thing is. Mecca was a global trade route as I've shown but in the same it could have been a tribal one
Perhaps the reason Quran calls it mother of all cities was because of how famous it was among the arab tribes.

[AMuslimDude213]

Another funny thing about the argument is that Petra flooded in 551 and was destroyed by earthquakes and people Abandoned Petra in 551. so we can see it could NOT have been Petra since Petra died in 551 and theres no historical proof of Muhammad SAW being there 
So really the argument just springs back to NWOs face since there was no trade route in Petra after its destruction in 551. and Muhammad SAW was born in Makkah. as many historical records tell us. heck HIS OWN COUSIN. Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A came out of Makkah. no Petra was mentioned.

Even his adopted son. Zaid as his name is mentioned on the Quran. a historical Zaid of the such was only recorded in Mecca
 not a Petra.

So really this argument is hilarious as NWO is mentioning he follows the Quran yet goes against its Historical narrative it proposes.

Very Ironic Wallahi 

[Albarra]

MuslimDue, I think he stopped responding after AhmadFarooq destroyed him.

[AMuslimDude213]

Yes but this argument is still being taken seriously by Missionaries,its just historically embarassing and unsupported,really.