Wa Alaikum As'salam dear brother Fadi,
There are
several errors in your posts. The following are the corrections:
1- Hasebo


?? does not mean "think". It means reckoned.
2- Zano

?. It is not ZANO. It is THANNO. And it means "they thought".
3- Shako

?. Doubted. Ok. But what does this have to do with seeing Jesus getting crucified.
4- Shubbiha


? does not just mean alike. And I don't know why you insist on this meaning when that would be wrong in the context of Noble Verse 4:157. I already gave you the
playing dead to the bear example. By playing dead, the bear would be confused into thinking that the person is dead. There would be
TASHABUH (mix up). And it would be
SHUBBIHA to the bear that the person was dead, when in fact the person was alive playing dead.
We're not in much disagreements here regarding the meanings of the Noble Word SHUBBIHA. However, you keep insisting on forcing a false interpretation into the Noble Verse. The following points are important to consider:
1- No second person was mentioned in the Noble Verse.
2- Jesus was the one who was sentenced to death.
3- Jesus was "executed" by the infidels.
Notice the double quotes here.4- It appeared to them that Jesus was killed.
So far we do not have any second person here. Allah Almighty saved Jesus from pain and death. This is in the Bible and the Glorious Quran. Now, let's pay attention to the point that will finish the conjecture:
5- Allah Almighty RAISED JESUS TO HIM. We already talked about WAFAT and TAWAFFA.
6- It makes no sense that Jesus was raised to Heaven during his sleep before the crucifixion. I say this because:
(a)- AGAIN AND AGAIN, no second person is mentioned in the Noble Verse.
You are forcing this on Noble Verse 4:157! It is all about Jesus and none other.
(b)- Allah Almighty elaborated twice in the same Noble Verse, 4:157, that they did not kill Jesus.
(c)- If Jesus wasn't even on earth that day, let alone the cross, then the context of the Noble Verse should've been that they did not even capture Jesus. But instead, the context is about
Jesus' execution and its details.
You have nothing but conjecture when you insist on a second person substitution. Noble Verse 4:157 does not mention any second person. You are the one forcing this on the Holy Quran. Why do you keep injecting this falsehood into the Glorious Quran? We already have Prophets before Jesus that were saved
from death DURING EXECUTION by Allah Almighty. I already gave you Abraham and Jonah.
Jonah's Parable:And did not Jesus give his last and final Parable to his disciples to be that similar to Jonah's experience? We know:
1- Jonah was alive when he was on the shore.
2- Jonah was alive when he was in the whale's belly.
3- Jonah was alive when he was vomited out of the whale's belly.And Jonah in the Bible and the Glorious Quran went through death and survived it. I know the Bible is not the Holy Word of Allah Almighty, but not all of it is false either. I find it quite amazing that Jesus used
Jonah as his final parable, because this destroys the crucifixion lie. There is so much evidence that backs up my point from the Bible. It is just that some Muslims and the Christians have this whole thing misunderstood.
Was there a substitute to Jonah?Both the Bible and the Glorious Quran agree that there was no substitute to Jonah. And it is quite obvious that those who saw Jonah get swallowed by the whale also thought that he was dead. SHUBBIHA LAHUM there also.
So if Jesus used Jonah as his last and final Parable, and there was no substitute to Jonah, then why on earth must we believe that there was a substitute to Jesus on the cross? Who is using conjecture here?
Why the Parable when he will not even go through it?And why must Jesus give his SILLY PARABLE of Jonah when he himself will not even go through the "death" (notice the double quotes) experience?? What does he have to do with any of it if he wasn't to go through it?
Take care,
Osama Abdallah