Answering Christianity Research Center

Firstly, i want to know why are u either intentionaly quoting a manipulated translation, anyone who has read the quran knows that it does not talk about lewdness between 2 men but rather between the opposite sexes.

Secondly, quran has never been changed, it's preservation is far to complex for anyone to manipulate it.

Here is the correct translation from quran.com.

Quran[4:15] "Those who commit unlawful sexual intercourse of your women - bring against them four [witnesses] from among you. And if they testify, confine the guilty women to houses until death takes them or Allah ordains for them [another] way." Sahih international

Quran[4:16] "And the two who commit it among you, dishonor them both. But if they repent and correct themselves, leave them alone. Indeed, Allah is ever Accepting of repentance and Merciful." Sahih international

As u can see clearly what u quoted is an intentional manipulation of translation. The arabic quranic words have never been changed since there acient arabic from prophet muhammad pbuh time. Also at that time were thousands who memorized the entire quran and now there are millions, no matter how are people can try to make manipulated translation it doesn't matter since we can always translate the original text again to confirm the liars and if the liars SOMEHOW got hold of all qurans, no matter we have millions who memorized quran verse by verse.



As u can see there is nothing about 2 men, but opposite sexes, a man and a woman. I do not know wether if this was intentional. But if u are the same person who was banned recently, atleast be a man and admit to who u are. I noticed the similarities of what u post. U act like that ur just asking but there is a double standard that seems as though ur playing around with us qith these childish pranks. Stop keeping up this charade and if ur a real man hold a debate with us rather then playing these tricks, because they are growing old and showing how weak u are.

There is a big misconception of this subject that is continiously raised in media and even my some muslim qho bought into the game of the mushrikeen.

They say that islam needs to reform. This is absolute ludacracy, why? Simply because most of our historial conflicts weren't due to religion but rather politics. Issues of deciding a calipha or issues of favoring one person over another.

Islam had nothing to do with our human decisions. Ialam ia perfect. But they try hard to make it reform so they can add their ascetric percersion and make it easier to destroy us like what they did to the torah(by making usury permissible) and injeel(claiming that it is gospel, when goapel it self is written by "the lying pen of the scribes")

However, in all these issues, yes i do agree with u that the ummah does need to reform. Why? Due to continous politics over pety issues(even they there weren't too pety), the fact is we grown to hate even our own brothers and sisters. We need to spiritually reform our hearts and come together as 1 muslim ummah under the banner of la illaha illallah muhammadan rasoollallah. we should leave all other issues to allah swt. Because those who keep bringing these issues up. Continue to drive us away from each other even more.

Remember brothers and sisters that it is the plot of the dajjal system(illuminati, international bankers, freemasonry, sabbatists, zionists, satanists, frankist and etc.) To divide and conquer us. Let us not fall for their political espionage.

Since Jinn are like Insan(humans), since both are on trial. They both do carry a soul. When it comes to spiritually both men and jinn are on trial and will have equal judgement.

"Except whom your Lord has given mercy, and for that He created them. But the word of your Lord is to be fulfilled that, "I will surely fill Hell with jinn and men all together". (The Quran, 11:119)

Also note, that Song of Solomon mentions that he will "Shout and Roar." this isn't the character of rasool saw, thus it makes song of solomon not a reliable source to point out evidence that muhammad pbuh was mentioned in bible. However, the Isaiah 42 and the rest info are solid proof. The objection that the christian and jews state, "You are not reading it in the context." Then the question lies, What context? they don't have any info regarding in what circumstances these things were said. Truth of the fact is, Jesus pbuh and rest of the prophets pbuthem, recieved tablet a 1 complete source, but prophet muhammad pbuh, recieved revelation throughout his life. There is no real historical context in regards to when or why these verses were mentioned. If there is i would love to read up on it, but besides the point. There objection to the ahmad pbuh and isaiah 42, is very weak. But we shouldn't hold on to song of solomon and bible of barnabas because, 1. song of solomon doesn't actually mention ahmad, but muhammad as a word, thus isn't comparable to the quran. 2. Bible of Barnabas has contradictions that even goes against our own religion.

But great findings brother. jazakallah kayrum.

I happened to stumble onto this on internet. Article talks about and shows pics of the newly discovered bible recorded in lead pages. The article suggets possibly was written few years right after supposed death(according to christians) of jesus pbuh.

My question is, does anyone know about this? This finding was studied by professors and they stated it is highly likely that this codic is not a forgery. Also they are working on a written verson that is more readible.

Plz take a look brothers:   http://www.laudable.com/article/31083846/a-set-of-lead-books-may-contain-historys-first-mentions-of-jesus-christ?paramt=null&param4=lau-ysa-us-de-lifestyle&param1=357592338&param2=16536&param5=a8dLho2WBTvDZ9g--&param6=32710886845&s=8

Thank you so much brothers i am still going through all this info u have provided me, also i came across this info:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/islamistruth.wordpress.com/2011/08/15/battle-of-jamal-its-real-face/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon

Ibn Habban narrated in al-Thiqat that ‘Aisha wrote to Abu Musa al-Ash’ari and to ‘Ali in al-Kufa: “You have witnessed the events leading to the murder of ‘Uthman and I have decided to go and fix the matters between the people…”

وقال:أي أُمه، ما أشخصك وما أقدمك هذه البلدة؟ قالت: أي بنى، إصلاح بين الناس

‘Ali then sent al-Qa’qa’ ibn ‘Amr al-Tamimi to ‘Aisha and he said: “O mother, what brings you to these lands?” she said: “my son I have come to settle matters between the people.”

And after the war of al-Jamal ‘Ali told ‘Aisha:

فقاللها: غفر الله لك. قالت: ولك، ما أردت إلا الإصلاح

“May Allah forgive you” she said: “And you, I only wished to fix the affairs.”

As for the Shia who said that she went to rebel against ‘Ali and take the Caliphate for herself, that is a lie, she went to make reform by punishing the killers of Ameer al-Mumineen and she had a Mahram with her that is her sister’s son ‘Abdullah ibn al-Zubair, because going out to reconcile and fix the affairs of the people in the time of Fitnah is an order from Allah just like Hajj is an order. Another lie being spread is that al-Zubair forced her to go out but this is not true as this was her opinion even before al-Zubair and Talha came to Mecca, we read in the Hadith that when she was on her way back to Mecca:

عبدالله بن عامر الحضرمي فقال: ما ردك يا أم المؤمنين؟ قالت: ردّني أن عثمان قُتلمظلومًا، وأن الأمر لا يستقيم ولهذه الغوغاء أمر، فاطلبوا دم عثمان تعزُّواالإسلام. فكان عبد الله أول من أجابها

‘Aisha met ‘Abdullah bin ‘Amer al-Hadrami who said: “What brings you back O mother of believers?” she said: “What brings me back is that ‘Uthman was killed and he was innocent, the affair of the Muslims will not be fixed while these rebels run rampant, so ask for ‘Uthman’s blood to fortify Islam.” And ‘Abdullah was the first member of their army.

I have not come to full conclusion since i still need to go through throughly the links u brothers provided me. But so far it seems that this was a big misunderstanding and manipulation by a munafiks and hypocrites, such as ibn saib and jabalah.

Even though this was clear work of the hypocrites and the munafik jews who even the quran tells achieve great highets of evil and are the people who have great deal of hatred towards us, it seems that the shia want to use this situation to attack aisha ra, instead of blaming ibn saba and jabalah and rest of the hypocrites and munafiks. It is foolishbess from shias to think that we hate hazrat ali ra, when he was the 4th calipha and was always loved. In the twist of the shias i think they take out the name of ibn saba and blame it all on aisha ra, when they don't realize she is also considered ah lal byat(family of rasool raw). So there propaganda is very contridictory.

Asalam ul laykum brothers, i was debating with someone on youtube who blames aisha ra of attacking ali ra, i want to know the real truth behind this issue and what is the absolute truth, i know that hypocrites have always attacked aisha even allah swt protected her and the verse came out regarding"confirming news that comes from a sinner." Plz brother osama i would appreciate if u can give me real facts about this topic.