REASONS WHY MUTAH(TEMPORARY) MARRIAGE IS FORBIDDEN
https://islamqa.info/en/20738https://islamqa.info/en/27104IF SOMEONE WILL READ THIS REASONS HE WILL FOR SURE REALISE ALLAH WILLING THAT THE OPINION I ADOPTED IS EXTREMELY STRONG MOREOVER IF ALLAH JUST WANTED MUSLIMS TO USE SLAVE WOMAN FOR SEX THEN WHATS THE MEANING OF IDDAH LAW FOR A CAPTIVE WOMAN TAKEN AS SLAVE GIRL
REFUTING ALI SINA
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur'an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:RapeI HAVE ALREADY REFUTED ALL THE HADITHS NOW I AM REFUTING SCHOLARS PAGE
A man may gratify his passion with his female slave in whatever way he pleases- It is lawful for a man to perform the act of Azil (i.e. coitus interruptus) with his female slave without her consent, whereas he cannot lawfully do so by his wife unless with her permission. –The reason of this is that the Prophet has forbidden the act of Azil with a free woman without her consent but has permitted it to a master in the case of his female slave. Besides, carnal connexion is the right of a free woman for the gratifying of her passion, and the propagation of children (whence it is that a wife is at liberty to reject a husband who is an eunuch or impotent); whereas a slave possesses no such right.—A man, therefore, is not at liberty to injure the right of his wife, whereas a master is absolute with respect to his slave. If, also, a man should marry the female slave of another, he must not perform the act of Azil with her without the consent of her master.
The Hidaya p.600. Archived at [3]
AS FAR AS COITUS INTERRUPTUS IS CONCERNED SOME SCHOLARS SAY IT IS ALLOWED TO PERFORM IT WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF FEMALE SLAVE BUT HE DIDN'T SAID THAT IT IS FINE TO RAPE HER OR HARM HER FORCEFUL INTERCOURSE
I HAVE A BIT DIFFERENT OPINION SINCE ONE OF THE WAYS A SLAVE WOMAN GETS HER FREEDOM IS BY BORING CHILD TO HER MASTER SO SHE MIGHT HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONSENT FOR COITUS INTERRUPTUS. MAYBE THE CAN PERFORM AZLI WITHOUT HER CONSENT BUT THAT FOR SURE NOT ALWAYS BECAUSE IT WILL KILL HER POSSIBLE WAY OF BECOMING FREE AND ISLAM ENCOURAGES FREEDOM OF SLAVES IF THEY WANT IT.
Husband forcing his wife to have intercourse
Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 33597
ALI SINA IS UNNECESARILY CREATING CONFUSION THRUOGH THIS FATWA HE IS PROTRAYING AS THOUGH IT IS ALLOWED TO RAPE UR WIFE AND SLAVE GIRL IF SHE IS REFUSING TO SEX
HERE IS THE RESPONSE BY THE SAME SCHOLAR
https://islamqa.info/en/40405THIS WILL INSHAALLAH CLARIFY
WITH REGARDS TO THIS FATWA
Intercourse with a slave woman is not regarded as zina (adultery)
Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 20802
I HAVE ALREADY CLEARED WITH EXPLANATION
[It is] un-Islamic to stop husbands from having sex with their wives even if they were doing so without their consent.[1]
Dr Aamir Liaqat Hussain, Pakistan's minister of state for religious affairs
I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THIS SCHOLAR BUT HE IS SIMPLY CONTRADICTING THE ISLAMIC LAWS
https://islamqa.info/en/9602Moreover, the founder of the Shafi'i madhabs also confirmed that stance:
If a man acquires by force a slave-girl, then has sexual intercourse with her after he acquires her by force, and if he is not excused by ignorance, then the slave-girl will be taken from him, he is required to pay the fine, and he will receive the punishment for illegal sexual intercourse.
— Al-Shafi'i, Kitabul Umm, Vol.3, p.253.
NOW DO THIS ANTI ISLAMICSTS UNDERSTAND ISLAM BETTER THAN IMAM SHAFI
Malik related to me from Nafi that a slave was in charge of the slaves in the khumus and he forced a slave-girl among those slaves against her will and had intercourse with her. Umar ibn al-Khattab had him flogged and banished him, and he did not flog the slave-girl because the slave had forced her.
— Sahih al-Bukhari, 1:85:81,[41]Al-Muwatta, 41 3.15
HOW COME SUCH A MINIATURE SCHOLAR FORGOT ABOUT IMAM SHAFII A SECOND GENERATION SCHOLAR AND SON OF THE COMPANION OF PROPHET MUHMMAD (SWS)