AS FAR AS TEMPORARY SEX WITH SLAVE WOMAN IS CONCERNED IT IS MY OWN VIEW AFTER HAVING STUDYING THE HADITHS BUT THERE IS NO AS SUCH HADITH TO SUPOORT MY VIEW BUT DUE TO ABSENCE OF ANY OPPOSITION AND EVIDENCE OF ONE SCHOLAR
TAKEN FROM TAHFEEM UL QURAN
If a military commander permitted his soldiers to temporarily use the female captives as objects of sexual desire and distributed them among the soldiers for that purpose, such an act would be considered unlawful by Islamic Law. Such an act is not essentially different from fornication or adultery. For details see my book Tafhimat, vol. 2, pp. 366-84, and Rasai'il wa Masa'il, 6th edition, Lahore, 1976, vol. 3, pp. 102-4.
MY VIEW IS STRONGLY SUPPORTED U KNOW IN SHARII SENSE MOREOVER THIS WAS NOT A GENERAL PRACTICE EVIDENCE MAK THOSE WORDS "AS WE WERE SUFFERING FROM THE ABSENCE OF OUR WIVES" MEANS THEY WOULDN'T HAVE THOUGHT DOING THIS IF THERE WIVES WERE PRESENT.
INDEED ALLAH KNOWS BEST
YES NOW REFUTING ALI SINA
ALI SINA IN HIS WIKI ISLAM USES 2 BASELESS NOT EVEN REPORTS
1 FROM WILLIAM MUIR WHERE IT SAYS THAT THE PROPERTY OF BANU AL MUSTALIQ WERE SOLDTO HIGHEST BIDDERS TOTALLY NONSENSE
2 ABU SAID AL KHUDRI(RA) HAD SEX WITH ONE CAPTIVE SLAVE GIRL
AGAIN NONSENSE ACCORDING TO ALL AUTHENTIC HAADITHS SEERAH HADITHS AND RESOURCES WITH SAHIH ISNAADS SAYS ALL CAPTIVES AND PROPERTY OF BANU AL MUTALIQ WAS RETURNED
HERE IS THE VIDEO OF YASIR QADHI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zWX6aOKuPoAND SAYING PRACTICALLY U KNOW WE NEED AN HOUR OR ATLEAST A HALF FOR SEX BUT THE AUTHENTIC HADITH SAYS AS SOON AS THE CAPTIVES WERE DISTRIBUTED THEN SHE CAME.
INDEED ALLAH KNOWS BEST