Author Topic: rape of Female slaves refuted once and for all: sahaba and coitus interuptus?  (Read 17446 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
AS FAR AS TEMPORARY SEX WITH SLAVE WOMAN IS CONCERNED IT IS MY OWN VIEW AFTER HAVING STUDYING THE HADITHS BUT THERE IS NO AS SUCH HADITH TO SUPOORT MY VIEW BUT DUE TO ABSENCE OF ANY OPPOSITION AND EVIDENCE OF ONE SCHOLAR
TAKEN FROM TAHFEEM UL QURAN
If a military commander permitted his soldiers to temporarily use the female captives as objects of sexual desire and distributed them among the soldiers for that purpose, such an act would be considered unlawful by Islamic Law. Such an act is not essentially different from fornication or adultery. For details see my book Tafhimat, vol. 2, pp. 366-84, and Rasai'il wa Masa'il, 6th edition, Lahore, 1976, vol. 3, pp. 102-4.
 MY VIEW IS STRONGLY SUPPORTED U KNOW IN SHARII SENSE MOREOVER  THIS WAS NOT A GENERAL PRACTICE EVIDENCE MAK THOSE WORDS "AS WE WERE SUFFERING FROM THE ABSENCE OF OUR WIVES" MEANS THEY WOULDN'T HAVE THOUGHT DOING THIS IF THERE WIVES WERE PRESENT.
INDEED ALLAH KNOWS BEST
YES NOW REFUTING ALI SINA
ALI SINA IN HIS WIKI ISLAM USES 2 BASELESS NOT EVEN REPORTS
1 FROM WILLIAM MUIR WHERE IT SAYS THAT THE PROPERTY OF BANU AL MUSTALIQ WERE SOLDTO HIGHEST BIDDERS TOTALLY NONSENSE
2 ABU SAID AL KHUDRI(RA) HAD SEX WITH ONE CAPTIVE SLAVE GIRL
AGAIN NONSENSE ACCORDING TO ALL AUTHENTIC HAADITHS SEERAH HADITHS AND RESOURCES WITH SAHIH ISNAADS SAYS ALL CAPTIVES AND PROPERTY OF BANU AL MUTALIQ WAS RETURNED
HERE IS THE VIDEO OF YASIR QADHI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zWX6aOKuPo
AND SAYING PRACTICALLY U KNOW WE NEED AN HOUR OR ATLEAST A HALF FOR SEX BUT THE AUTHENTIC HADITH SAYS AS SOON AS THE CAPTIVES WERE DISTRIBUTED THEN SHE CAME.
INDEED ALLAH KNOWS BEST

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
EXTRA POINTS
1) LET US SEE THE VIEW OF ANOTHER PROMINENT SCHOLAR
Ibn Hazm (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Both slave women and free women are enjoined not to refuse the master or husband if he calls them for intercourse, so long as the woman who is called is not menstruating or sick and likely to be HARMED  by intercourse, or observing an obligatory fast. If she refuses with no excuse then she is cursed. End quote from al-Muhalla (10/40).

Offline QuranSearchCom

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Islam is the Divine Truth!
    • View Profile
Wa Alaikum As'salam dear brother Affan,

Jazaka Allah Khayr for your posts, akhi. 

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
2)
As far as those two posts by Ali sina Is concerned let me myself make it clear
With regards to the property of banu al mustaliq is concerned it was all returned to the people after they accepted Islam
Ali sina uses a quote from William muir in his article that the property was sold to highest bidders which is a clear cut lie and fabrication and another quote from al waqidi vol 3 page 416 saying that Abu said al khudri ( ra ) had sex with slave woman which is again a fabricated lie
Reasons
1) with regards to property please kindly go to whatsoever seerah possible it is clearly written that all properties was returned and All captives not even 1 less than taken were set free
2) with regards to source from al waqidi his narrations are not accepted if it contradicts the authentic hadith and seerah and what Ali sina used in his article
Root of terrorism 46-47
What he used is not even a narration because there is no narrator to the text he provided AT ALL
It's just like saying that
" I saw ur father hanging from a banyan tree"
Al waqidi vol 4 page 56
3) one of the possibilities is that he fabricated the report because he is an excellent fabricator and changes words let me expose him right here
In his article 72 virgins he wrote that the text sunnah talks about breasts of hoor (Astagfirullah)
Here it is available
Wikiislam 72 virgins
And he gives reference of jami tirmidhi which are not present at All
Please visit
https// islamqa.info / en / 243879
3)if someone is doubting me and my research then please kindly go to ibn kasir al seerah wa nabiwwiyah
Vol 3 page 217
See also the introduction where Ibn kathir clearly stated that he took from the magazi of al waqidi and on page 217 the hadith on coitus interuptus has been included in seerah but no where did ibn Kathir included such report from al waqidi that ANY COMPANION ACTUALLY HAD SEX WITH ANY CAPTIVE WOMEN IF THERE WAS SUCH REPORT PRESENT THEN HE WOULD HAVE SURELY INCLUDED IN HIS SEERAH
Indeed Allah Knows best
Now even after all this someone is in doubt then I challenge whomsoever want Either he be Ali sina or anyone else
COME UP WITH ANYTHING AND AM READY



Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile

Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
NOTE
All of those Hadiths in which
Religionofpeace.com has written "another account of women taken as slaves and Raped After Prophet Muhmaad ( sws ) approval"
Is nothing but a bunch of fabricated words in the context of Hadiths.
ONE OF THE PROOF OF PROPHET MUHMAAD ( SWS ) BEING THE PROPHET
Before understanding this i want to make the Reader of this article bear in mind that Slavery at the end of the day is Not something PROHIBITED But for understanding one Needs to understand the Purpose of slavery
PLEASE GO TO ISLAM Q AND A AND ISLAM. ORG
NOW THE PROOF
Often people ask that how do you view It as moral that the companions of Prophet Muhmaad ( sws ) wanted to Perform coitus interuptus with the women just taken as slaves and How We are defending it.
AS I AL READY SAID IN THE STARTING THAT PROPHET MUHMAAD ( SWS ) FORBADE ONLY THOSE THINGS WHICH HE KNEW WERE FORBIDDEN
NOW THE CHALLENGE COMES
U KNOW WHEN THEY ASKED HIM ABOUT COITUS INTERUPTUS IN BATTLE OF BANU AL MUSTALIQ HE DIDN'T SAID IF YOU BELIEVE IN ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER AND LAST DAY OF JUDGEMENT THEN U CAN'T COHABIT WITH A CAPTIVE WOMEN BEFORE THE COMPLETION OF WAITING PERIOD.
SO HOW COME IT TOOK HIM 3 LONG YEARS TO FABRICATE AND INVENT A SIMPLE YET VERY VERY IMPORTANT LAW IF HE WAS A FABRICATER AND THEN TO HE PRODUCE A MORE ETHICAL AND A LAW THAT IS HONORING AND SANCTIFYING THE RIGHTS OF FEMALE SLAVE
EVERY LAW THAT PROPHET MUHMAAD ( SWS ) NARRATED TO HIS FOLLOWRRS WAS REVEALATION TO HIM. AND I CHALLENGE WHICH CIVILISATION WHICH CULTURE AND RELIGION TALKS ABOUT WAITING PERIOD FOR FEMALE SLAVE
Quran chp 32 Surah Sajda Verse 3
Or THEY SAY MUHMAAD ( SWS ) HAS FABRICATED IT NAY SAY TO THEM IT IS THE TRUTH FROM THEIR LORD.


Offline Affan Khan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
NOTE
1) BY ALL THIS EXPLANATIONS I NEVER MEANT TO SAY THAT IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE TO PERFORM COITUS INTERUPTUS WITH SLAVE WOMAN.
WHAT I WAS TACKLING WAS THE QUESTION
"IF ISLAM GIVES RIGHTS TO SLAVE WOMAN THEN WHY COMPANIONS OF PROPHET MUHMAAD ( SWS ) IMMEDIATELY WANTED TO HAVE SEX WITH CAPTIVE WOMEN OF BANU AL MUSTALIQ?
REASON I HAVE EXPLAINED IN TOTALITY THE REASON THAT SINCE THE IDDAH LAW WAS NOT REVEALED AND THAT RULE DIDN'T CAME INTO FORCE THAT S THE REASON THEY IMMEDIATELY WANTED TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP
MORE OVER IF THEY RAPIST AS SUCH THEN HOW COME THEY RELEASED ALL THE CAPTIVES WITH OUT HAVING SEX OUT OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL?

 

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube