Answering Christianity Research Center

Why defend the deceased against a claim that is not offensive? I see nothing wrong with a preacher being gay, or straight, or bisexual. Let us not judge people by their sexual orientation!

You see nothing wrong with a preacher being  gay, or straight, or bisexual? It seems to me that you have been brainwashed by the media? If you are not Muslim or do not have a religion, what defines morals for you? Nothing but the media. This is why the media promotes atheism so much, they are the easiest to brainwash! Here are some reasons why it is incorrect (the true first reason why, is that Allah(SWT) forbade it, so who are you to say otherwise and to disobey?)
1. You're more likely to get STDs and STIs
2. You can't reporoduce, everyone should reproduce, unless if they are unable to.
3. You think it is okay that you do anal intercourse? It is against human nature. Or fellatios to same gender?
4. What are the roles in the house? In a normal marriage, there are roles for both the male and the female, what about in gay marriage?
5. What can 2 woman do together in bed without any "toys"?
6. God forbade it, and god knows more about us than we know about ourselves, and god will only tell us to do something which is best for us.
7. Intercourse would extremely hurt for the back passage for a recieving male

But the real question is, was Budhism a religion of Allah? According to IslamQA it is not. And it is a reputable website, so i accept Sheikh Munajjid's opinion until further evidence is provided
Allah knows best.

I need help with an argument i am in, I will include the discussion below (note i am copying his words down and i am not slandering Islam) His argument is in red and mine is in blue.

Him: so you're saying "I am telling you what scholars of the past and present have interpreted".

DON'T YOU AND YOUR SCHOLARS KNOW ALLAH HAS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN ANY INTERPRETATION BY MEN.
ONLY ALLAH HIMSELF CAN INTERPRET IS QURAN.

3.7. It is He who has sent down to you, the Book; IN IT ARE VERSES THAT ARE PRECISE - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific. As for those in whose hearts is deviation, they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation. AND NO ONE KNOWS ITS INTERPRETATION EXCEPT ALLAH. But those firm in knowledge say, "We believe in it. All is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding.

"NO ONE KNOWS ITS INTERPRETATION EXCEPT ALLAH."

The Qur'ān must be understood and obeyed litteraly.

Your scholars are described by the Qur'ān as "those in whose hearts is deviation".

Me: “It is He Who has sent down to you (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) the Book (this Qur’aan). In it are Verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the Verses of Al-Ahkaam (commandments), Al-Faraa’id (obligatory duties) and Al-Hudood (laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers)]; and others not entirely clear. So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings save Allaah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: “We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord.” And none receive admonition except men of understanding”

This seems to be a more PRECISE translation.

“So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation”, i.e., misguidance, and ignoring the truth in favour of falsehood, “they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof” i.e., they interpret that which is not entirely clear in such a way that allows them to distort it to suit their corrupt aims, because the wording could be interpreted in the way they want. But in the case of the verses which are entirely clear, they have no chance of doing that, so that is clear proof against them. Hence Allaah says: “seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials)” i.e., to misguide their followers and give them the impression that they are using evidence from the Qur’aan to support their bid’ah (innovation). This is evidence against them, not for them. It is similar to when the Christians argue that the Qur’aan says that ‘Eesa (Jesus) is a Spirit from God and His Word that He bestowed upon Maryam (Mary), but they ignore the verses in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

He [‘Eesa (Jesus)] was not more than a slave. We granted Our Favour to him …”

[al-Zukhruf 43:59] 

“Verily, the likeness of ‘Eesa (Jesus) before Allaah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: ‘Be!’ — and he was”

[Aal ‘Imraan 3:59]

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT ARE YOU DOING, YOU have increased me in my faith. Thank you, this verse is PRECISELY describng you, you try to find interpretations that suit YOU, NOWHERE does it state that the Qur'an must be taken literally. It is talking about how people will try to find interpretations that Suit them

And why do you mention verse: 33:36 and 4:14

And Allah knows best

Him: which translation is it from ?

The translation you are using is FULL of human commentary. Is that what you call "more PRECISE"?

So my question is, the brackets they use, [] is that commentary of the translation? or is the bracket about when it is taken in context?

Both links do not address my question.

As far as i know, that hadith is Saheeh, i will get back to you when i find a reference. Also can i Ask you, what sect of Islam do you follow, if you follow any? Why do you hate Mua'wiya, he may have made some mistakes, but he is still a Sahabi of the Prophet (SAW.)

“And the foremost to embrace Islam of the Muhaajiroon and the Ansaar and also those who followed them exactly (in Faith). Allaah is well-pleased with them as they are well-pleased with Him. He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow (Paradise), to dwell therein forever. That is the supreme success”

[al-Tawbah 9:100]

If in the Quran it says that ALLAH ALL MIGHTY is pleased with them, then who are YOU to say otherwise?

Imam Ahmad said: If you see a man mentioning one of the companions of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in a bad way, then call his Islam into question.

So, why do you hate the sahabi? where did you learn YOUR Islam from, I see you have good intentions, but do not let them make you go astray. You will not capture the hearts by the way you communicate, do not harshly criticise, i see you do that even on your website to the orientalists.
"And the servants of the Most Merciful are those who walk upon the earth easily, and when the ignorant address them [harshly], they say [words of] peace,"
[The Noble Quran 25:63]
But if that is to an IGNORANT person, then what about to your fellow Muslim? We are having an argument/debate here, why the harsh words?

You say that the place I learnt Islam from was from a dumpster. I learn it from a Sheikh, why do you hate sheikhs?

You have not given evidence for your claim about that THE HORN OF SATAN thing.

If he rapes my kin in front of me, and i had the power to stop him, then yes i will stop him. But if i didn't have the power, or if i were to stop him, but it would cause even more harm, then i will not.
But regardless, I will try my best, with Allah's will, to not stray from the Jama'

And Allah knows best.

modern opinion permit drawing living animals as long as the drawing is incomplete & not similar to the size of living creature

Sorry i have to correct you there, not living things, anything with a ROOH or a soul should not be drawn, so plants and bacteria and the sort is allowed to draw. However for educational purposes, without going overboard, it should be fine insh allah.

Quote from: Islam1st on June 13, 2016, 08:28:02 AM

How do we refute someone who says that at-Taariq 86:6-7 does not mention the Ovum or Ovary or egg cells?

As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,

Al-Taariq is the Star that is Knocking.  This is the Pulsar, which the Glorious Quran called it Knocking and Penetrating.  Both had been scientifically confirmed:

www.answering-christianity.com/pulsars_are_knocking_and_penetrating.htm

Al-Taraaeb is what you meant, and this had been demonstrated medically at:

www.answering-christianity.com/detailed_meanings_of_scientific_words_in_verses.htm#embryology

The Glorious Quran's Miracle had been thoroughly demonstrated on both topics above.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Sorry that my question wasn't quite clear, my question is that this verse about the fluid ejected, seems to be talking only about the Sperm/Semen. How do we respond to someone who says Since the Egg is not a gushing liquid, and the sperm and the egg combined make the human, and this verse does not mention it. Or does it mention it? or is it specifically talking about something else