Further Topic Research:
Syntax help

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog

Rebuttal to Craig Winn "Prophet of Doom: Chapter 3" article:

This article is a rebuttal to Craig Winn's article that is located at:   http://www../chapter3.html.

 

 

Important Note to the Reader:

Craig Winn purposely twisted and modified the English translations that he used!  He changes words in translations and uses non-Muslim ones.  I've noticed this a lot through his translations of the Noble Verses that he used from the Noble Quran.


Please visit:

List of Craig Winn's fabricated lies and deliberate alteration of quotes, WITH CLEAR-CUT PROOFS!

 

 

Before we get into the detailed rebuttal of this article, let's look at the following from his Bible:

 

Terrorism in Islam?! (click here)
Let's look at the real terrorism in the Bible:

Pedophilia with
3-year old slave girls in the Bible!
Forcing 3-year old slave girls into sex during the Mosaic Law in the Bible! (click here)

Terror in the Bible by a number of Prophets! (click here)

Pregnant women will be ripped open! (click here)

The NT punishes children with death! (click here)

Terrorism:
"kill all the boys and non-virgin women"!
Also under the Mosaic Law! (click here)

Another killing all men, women, children and animals by Moses! (click here)

Another taking all women and children as spoils of war by Moses!
(click here)

Moses was a murderer before he became a Prophet! (click here)

Killing all of the "suckling infants" by the thousands by Saul! (click here)

Dashing little children against rocks in the book of Psalm!
Praising the dashing of little children against rocks as a form of revenge! (click here)

42 innocent children were killed using Wild Bears by Prophet Elisha!
Prophet Muhammad on the other hand loved children even those who threw stones at him in the city of Al-Ta'if. (click here)

Both equal: "Kill Righteous and the wicked"! (click here)

Maiming of the enemies' bodies under Moses' and David's Laws:
Cutting the hands and feet of the enemies in the Bible, and hanging their alive bodies on trees until they DIE.
(click here)

David's Selective Murders!
David so carelessly killed an innocent man for only telling him news.
(click here)

X-Rated Pornography in the Bible, by King Solomon!
Literally, women's vaginas and breasts taste like "wine", and brothers can "suck" their sisters' and lovers' privates!
(click here)

Fathers' fingers into their daughters' vaginas!
Under the Mosaic Law, fathers were allowed to do "Digital Defloration" to their daughters.
(click here)

Shutting the loud mouths of those who unjustly attack Islam, with Truth.

Aisha in Islam:

Let's discuss the age of Aisha being 9 when she married our Prophet (CLICK HERE):

1-  See proofs, in the "Aisha being 9" article, from the Bible about little girls as young as 9 were married off and even sold off by their fathers as slave girls to men who were even older than their fathers.

2-  See also irrefutable proofs that pedophilia and terrorism exist in the Bible.  During the Mosaic times in the Bible's Old Testament, 3-year old slave girls were literally forced into sex under Moses' Orders and Command.  You sometimes have to read things twice to believe them!

See also: Maiming of the enemies' bodies in the Bible.   Cutting the hands and feet of the enemies in the Bible, and hanging their live bodies on trees until they DIE.

*** Killing of innocent children in the Bible.

*** X-Rated Pornography in the Bible.

*** Fathers sticking their fingers into their daughters' vaginas before marriage in the Bible.


3-
  See also proofs how Aisha's parents were the ones who married her to our Prophet, and that no Muslim or even pagan objected to the marriage because it was widely practiced.  The reason no one objected was:

  1. People used to have very short life-spans in Arabia.   They used to live between 40 to 60 years maximum.  So it was only normal and natural for girls to be married off at ages 9 or 10 or similar.

  2. Marriage for young girls was widely practiced among Arabs back then, and even today in many third-world non-Muslim and Muslim countries.

Please visit: The age of Aisha, girls similar to her in the Bible, and unbelievable pedophilia against 3-year old slave babies in the pedophilic Bible.

Also visit: Why Muta (temporary) Marriage was allowed and why it was discontinued.

 

Having said all of that, let us now proceed:

 

 

 

He wrote:

CHAPTER 3

I DON'T NOAH 'BOUT THIS

“He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their
descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.”

     Muhammad had a religion to sell, and by god, he was going to make it sound religious no matter how often he had to reshuffle the facts. Tabari I:323 “I asked the Messenger of Allah how many prophets there were. He replied, ‘124,000.’ I asked him how many of those were messengers. He replied, ‘313, a large crowd.’”
    That’s a problem of incalculable magnitude for Muslims. Bukhari:V8B76N550 “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘From my followers there will be a crowd of 70,000 in number who will enter Paradise whose faces will glitter as the moon.’” These numbers don’t add up. There must be a mistake. Let’s check another Hadith. Bukhari V4B54N410 “Verily! 70,000 of my followers will enter Paradise altogether; so that the first and the last amongst them will enter at the same time.”  Sorry Muslims, Paradise is full. A giant “No Vacancy” sign is hanging over the brothel door. In fact, it’s so overbooked, 54,000 prophets have already been turned away. With odds like this, it’s no wonder Muslims are willing to kill for a place in line.
    Now that we know Muhammad’s Paradise was oversold, how about Allah’s Hell? Bukhari:V8B76N537 “The Prophet said, ‘Allah will say, “Adam!” “I am obedient to Your orders.” Allah will say, “Bring out the people of the Fire.” “How many are the people of the Fire?” Allah will say, “Out of every thousand take out nine-hundred and ninety-nine persons.” At that time children will become hoary-headed and every pregnant female will drop her load. You will see the people as if they were drunk. Allah’s punishment will be very severe.’” There have been more than ten billion humans born thus far. If one in every one thousand people get to frolic with Allah’s babes, the brothel’s capacity must be ten million, not seventy thousand. Somebody isn’t telling the truth.
    “That news distressed the companions of the Prophet too much, and they said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Who amongst us will be that lucky one out of the one-thousand who will be saved from the Fire?’ He said, ‘Have the good news that one-thousand will be from Gog and Magog, and the one (to be saved will be) from you.’ [Since he wasn’t a real prophet, Muhammad didn’t know that the people of Gog and Magog would all succumb to Islam. They include today’s Iranians, Iraqis, Turks, and Muslims in the Islamic Republics of the Russian Federation.] The Prophet added, ‘By Allah, I Hope that you Muslims will be one third of the people of Paradise.’ On that, we glorified and praised Allah by saying, ‘Allahu Akbar.’ The Prophet then said, ‘I hope that you will be one half of the people of Paradise.’” Therefore, a maximum of 35,000 Muslims will burn in lust rather than in Allah’s fire. That represents 1 in 90,000 Muslims. Said another way, if you were to fill a stadium with 90,000 Muslims, all but one would go to hell. Unless, of course, the “prophet” was lying. (In that case, they will all lose.)
    Gog and Magog is Islam’s time bomb—a gift from the Jews. We’ll discuss the implications in the last chapter. For now, it’s sufficient to know that Muhammad was over-hyping hell and overselling paradise. And if his Islamic god was really God, we’re in trouble. He’s so unmerciful, unforgiving, unloving, intolerant, and sadistic 99.9% of us are destined for hell.
    Throughout the Sunnah and Qur’an Muhammad falsely attributes Muslim prophet and messenger status to Biblical characters in order to remake them in his image. Most every prophet/messenger listed in the Qur’an came from the Bible, including: Adam, Noah, Seth, Abraham, Lot, Jacob, Joshua, Jonah, Job, Moses, David, Solomon, Saul, Elijah, Ezra, Enoch, John, and Jesus. Moses is mentioned by name in 500 verses, Abraham in 250. Muhammad’s non-Biblical list consists of mistakes and myths. For example, the oft-mentioned Hud was from the mythical land of “Ad.” (Something Muhammad couldn't do.)
    “I asked the Messenger, ‘Who was the first of them?’ He replied, ‘Adam.’ I asked him whether Adam was a prophet sent as a messenger. He replied, ‘Yes, Allah created him with His own hand and blew some of His spirit into him. Then He immediately fashioned him in perfect shape.’” So much for fermenting him. (Qur’an 15:26 & Tabari I:261)
    Tabari I:324 “When Adam was about to die, he called his son Seth and appointed him his heir. He taught him the hours of day and night and how the creatures should worship in each hour. He informed him that each hour had its special kind of creatures to worship in it. Then he said, ‘Son, the Flood will be on earth and last seven years.’ Adam wrote his will and addressed it to him.” While there is substantial evidence of the Biblical flood, it did not last seven years, and if Adam had been a prophet he would have gotten the facts right. Further, we were just told that animals are to practice Islam, worshiping, at prescribed hours.
    “After Adam’s death, political leadership fell to Seth. According to a tradition on the authority of the Messenger, Allah revealed fifty scrolls to Seth.” That would mean that between Adam and Seth, there were seventy-one scrolls of scripture. You’d think that with this vast quantity of divine revelation, the great Messenger of Allah would tell us something about their contents—some divine truth, perhaps. No. Sorry. Not even a hint. That’s because they never existed, and since they didn’t exist, they were hard to plagiarize. “‘O Messenger of Allah, how many books did Allah reveal?’ He replied, ‘104.’” Assuming that the Qur’an was one of them, what’s in the other 103?
    We have this treasure on the authority of the Messenger, Tabari I:328 “When the angel of death came to seize Adam, he said, ‘You have come too early. Sixty of my years remain.’ The angel of death replied, ‘Nothing remains. You gave those sixty years to your son David.’ The Messenger continued, ‘Adam denied it, and so on that day Allah established written documents and commanded the use of witnesses.’” David was 3000 years removed from Adam—hardly his son. And how can writing have been established while Adam was on his deathbed? Just a moment ago, Allah said he gave Adam twenty-one written scrolls and taught him the alphabet.
    A paragraph later, we’re told:
“Allah wrote this down in a document and had the angels witness it.… Whereupon Allah had the document brought down and had the angels produced as witnesses against him.” If Allah wrote, and if the Qur’an was important, why did it come down in the form of clanging bells and oral recitals rather than scrolls? (The answer is: it’s easier to get scriptural approval for power, lust, and booty if you’re making it up as you go along.)
    Tabari I:332 “Adam died. Seth and his brothers were in the regions east of Paradise at a village that was the first on earth.” Wait a minute; Allah said Paradise was up, and therefore not on earth. And how can this be the first village if Allah created cities on the third day of creation? We were even told that his footsteps became villages en route to Mecca. Somebody ought to have edited this stuff before trying to pass it off as scripture.
    The prophet’s next line further confirmed that he wasn’t inspired by God. “The sun and the moon were in eclipse for seven days and nights.” That’s impossible. The sun is eclipsed by the moon and the moon by the earth’s shadow. They cannot both be “in eclipse.” Even a pretend god ought to be smarter than this.
    To establish a Muslim ritual, Muhammad said, “When Adam died, the angels washed him separately several times with water and prepared a burial site. They said, ‘This shall be the custom among all Adam’s children.’” In Islam, non-martyrs are buried this way. Martyrs, like today’s suicide bombers, are not washed. One too many innocents: The blood of innocents smeared on their bodies is a badge of honor, Allah’s signal to escort them directly into paradise—wherever it might be.
    “The Messenger said, ‘Your father Adam was as tall as a very tall palm, that is sixty cubits. He had much hair and his privy parts were concealed. When he committed the sin of eating from the forbidden [wheat] tree, his secret part became apparent to him. He fled about in Paradise, but a tree encountered him and seized him by his forelock… When he was about to die, Allah sent down embalming chemicals and a shroud for him.” Didn’t Allah say Adam was bald because he bumped into heaven falling down? (Tabari I:298) And why would Allah need embalming fluid in heaven?
    Tabari I:333 “Ibn Ishaq said, ‘He was buried in Mecca in the cave of Abu Qubays, called the Treasure Cave.’” But there is no reason to look for his big bones there because, “Noah took them out, placed them in a coffin, and carried them along in the ark…. When Noah left the ark, he buried Adam in Jerusalem. And as mentioned before, Eve spun, wove, kneaded, baked, and did all kinds of women’s work.”
    One of the reasons I have been reporting these early Islamic Traditions is because they provide an insight into Muhammad’s character. They establish a pattern of behavior—a willingness to deceive. Specifically, they demonstrate that Muhammad was willing to pass himself off as an authority on godly and spiritual things when he clearly was not. That means his claim to being the Messenger of God is suspect. Therefore, so is the Qur’an and Islam.
    The second reason that I have shared so many of these with you is to demonstrate that Muhammad was incapable of innovative thought. Lacking creativity and godly inspiration, he corrupted the Bible and plagiarized the Talmud. In that regard, he and the fallen angel Lucifer had a great deal in common. Simply stated, Muhammad was not capable of inventing a religion. You will soon learn that the prophet actually stole the entirety of the religious scam that became Islam.
    Third, these twisted variants all serve a purpose. Muhammad used them to justify the inclusion of Qusayy’s pagan practices into Islam. They gave the Five Pillars, all of which were pagan, some semblance of monotheistic credibility. Time and again, Muhammad rewrote Jewish history to make Allah, Mecca, the Ka’aba, Hajj and himself seem worthy of veneration. He recast Adam, Noah, and Abraham as Muslim Messengers focused on Mecca.
    If Adam, Noah, and Abraham weren’t Muslims, then the preponderance of the Qur’an was stolen, not revealed. There’s no other explanation for Allah’s dependence on the Bible and Talmud. So Muhammad must convince us that the Jewish patriarchs worshiped Allah, received Qur’anic revelations, made journeys to Mecca, built the Ka’aba, worshiped there, and performed a complex array of Islamic rituals. If he fails in this regard, if his revisionist stories aren’t believable, then the Qur’an is a forgery, Islam is a counterfeit, and Muhammad was a fraud. That being the case, there is no justification for them to kill us over it.
    Finally, Muhammad corrupts the lives and words of Adam, Noah, Lot, and Abraham to excuse his pathetic existence. The Islamic Adam had a cavalry; he was a warrior and a tyrant just like Muhammad. Like the Islamic prophet, the Muslim Cain was guilty of incest; he was driven to murder by lust. The Islamic Noah wanted his people to be slaughtered for mocking him. The Islamic Abraham destroyed the small idols so that his people would turn to the largest one. Muhammad recast these men in his image. They were all embroiled in arguments with their peers that mirrored Muhammad’s Meccan trials. In each case Allah punished those who rejected the messenger just as Muhammad claims he will torment those who deny him.

 

My response:

You have mentioned three points:

1-  Contradictions in the number of believing Muslims who will make it in Heaven.

2-  Adam's creation and the sun and moon eclipses.

3-  The reason why Martyrs are not washed is because the blood of their "victims" is a "badge of honor" as you said.  This section is quite laughable because it will clearly and irrefutably expose the stupidity of Craig Winn.  See the proofs and details below.


Here is my response to your points:

Before I respond to your points in details, it is important for the reader to first know that the narrations above from Al-Tabari came from a book that contains historical accounts that were documented 100s of years after the Prophet's, peace be upon him, death.   Not everything you read is accurate and was necessarily told by the Prophet word for word, or even if at all!  It is important, if you wish to be objective and honest, to put the Noble Quran as the center for any Islamic argument.  If the Noble Quran makes a claim, then it is definitely agreed upon by all Muslims, and it is perfectly authentic.  Otherwise, GOD Almighty only Knows about what is true and what is false regarding the narrations that you use in Hadiths and Sunnah books.

In fact, the Al-Tabari volume is not very authentic and very doubtful when compared to the Hadiths' volumes and collections.  But even the Hadiths contain much corruptions in them, because they were documented 100s of years after the Prophet's death.   The "Sahih Bukhari" or "Authentic Bukhari" in English was the first volume to be compiled.  Bukhari is not an Arabic name!  Bukhari is derived from the word "Bukhara", which is a city in Afghanistan:

"We now come to the Iron Gate which corresponds exactly to the Quranic description, and has the best claim to be connected with Alexander's story.  It is near another Derbend in Central Asia, Hissar District, about 150 miles southeast of Bukhara......."  (www.answering-christianity.com/iron_gates.htm)  

For anyone who knows the Islamic history, this means that the Muslims spread Islam to the pagan Arabs, established the Islamic State in Arabia, then fought the Persians (Iranians) and the Romans; invaded the Persians and crushed the Romans, then fought the Hindus in Hindustan, invaded much of their lands such as "Pakistan", "Afghanistan", and much of the Indian territories, convert people there to Islam, and then Brother Bukhari appeared from his home town, Bukhara and decided to compile the Hadiths of "Sahih Bukhari".

Are these narrations all 100% perfect and reliable?  Any person with the least atom of a brain would say no.  I am not saying that all of the Hadiths must be rejected.  But for us to day to have close to 2,000,000 of them is quite ridiculous, because they can't all have been written down during our Prophet's times in Arabia.  Most of the Hadiths' chains of narrations today have 10s of narrators in them.  In the Hadith books, you would see something like the following:

"About such and such, that he heard his father say that such and such said, that he heard such and such say, that he heard such and such say, etc...."  Most of the narrations' links have tons of narrators in them, many times more than 10, and these people would be generations after each others!  In other words, they're not people at the same age or the same group.  And the worst dilemma of all, is that many of these chain of narrations have broken links in them, meaning, that two or three generations are missing in the chain!

Most of the hadiths are corrupt and are not recognized as authentic.  Most certainly the books of Al-Tabari and Ishaq are among the weakest and most doubtful sources, because they are more like history books that were written 300 years after the Prophet's death.  Their narrations were orally transmitted by others.   Many people took hadiths out of context, and many others added or took from them, and many others even fabricated lies, as Allah Almighty Warned us in the Noble Quran:

"A section of the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) say:  Believe in the morning what is revealed to the believers (Muslims), but reject it at the end of the day; perchance they may (themselves) turn back (from Islam).  (The Noble Quran, 3:72)"

Also, it is almost impossible to narrate a narration/saying accurately after 300 years in Arabic, because the language is very complex, poetical and artistic:

From www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm:

Problems with the proper Arabic language and the large quantity of narrations:

In Arabic, only original Arabs and those who speak proper (not slang) Arabic fluently, understand and appreciate the fact that the words are very minimum and their meanings are very maximum.  It is true and not a deception or innovation by translators to English that a single Arabic word can and would be translated to 3-5 English words!  The reason for this is because in Arabic (and this is part of the complexity in grammar, art and poetry of the Arabic language) meanings and not necessarily actual words can be all put together in one word.  In Arabic, a word is not original.  There are of course "root" words, but in most proper Arabic words, the actual word is not original; meaning that depending on the grammar, letters (of meaning) can be added to or taken from it to add or take from its meaning and intention.  This can change the entire meaning of the whole word  and sentence.

That is why Arabic poetry is historically known to be a very complex and advanced one.

Having said all of this, in the case of the hadiths, given the fact that there exists "weak/doubtful ones", and what is considered as "strong and reliable ones", it is difficult to know for sure if a single hadith was told as is 100% unchanged (intentionally or not intentionally) by the Prophet peace be upon him. One word taken off from the hadith and the whole meaning can and would be changed to something else.

For those "reliable or strong" hadiths, their sources are doubtful.  I have no doubt that the companions of the Prophet may Allah Almighty bless their souls did not intentionally commit forgery or lies.  But for one such as Abu Huraira to narrate thousands upon thousands of hadiths is preposterous!  Given the complexity and sensitivity of the Arabic language, it is extremely vital that every word be included in the narration.  I find it impossible to believe that Abu Huraira and many others like him were able to narrate everything perfectly in its original text.

That is why I accept the hadiths that are linked to the Noble Quran as the Truth and reject the others.

Also, there is no proof what so ever that all of the accepted hadiths of today were all written during the Prophet's time.  Some or even many of them were probably written down from individuals for personal use, but the thousands of hadiths (I was told close to 2 million hadiths!!) that exist today were not possibly all written during the Prophet's time. 

I only accept the hadiths that have a direct relationship to the Noble Quran, such as explaining how to Pray, fast, etc....

Example about my own name to simplify things:

Take "Osama" for example.  First of all, Osama in Arabic is written as "Osamat" with the "t" silent.  The "t" however is not always silent, and it can be used to give meanings and intentions to the name "Osama".  Osama can be written as "Osamatun", "Osamatan", "Osamatin", "Osamata", "Osamati", "Osamato".  The punctuations added to the "t" cause for any of these names to be pronounced.

When writing positively about "Osama", such as "Osama bin Zaid", the leader who defeated the Romans in one of the battles, these punctuations are added to his name for praising.  Unfortunately, I am not an expert in Arabic, nor can I explain in deep details about proper Arabic, but I know that use of punctuations IMPROPERLY can result in insulting the individual.  I can write negatively about a name using punctuations in their proper places.

THE REASON WHY THE NOBLE QURAN IS SO PERFECT IS BECAUSE its grammar was constructed in a very complex way, and the Arabic words were not only original words, but were put together uniquely in an excellent artistic fashion that no Arabic poet could match up to back then when Allah Almighty challenged the Arabs to come up with a "SURAH LIKE IT".


To the reader, please visit: 
What parts of the Bible and Hadiths do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth, and Why?


Having said all of that, let me respond to the points that you mentioned:

1-   The narration does not say that the number of believers in Paradise will be only 70,000.  It said that 70,000 will have faces as light as the moon's light; their faces "will glitter as the moon."  But even this narration is highly doubtful and contradicting to the Noble Quran:

"Then shall anyone who has done an atom's weight of good, see it!  And anyone who has done an atom's weight of evil, shall see it.  (The Noble Quran, Noble Verses 99:7-8)"

"And fear the Day when ye shall be brought back to God. Then shall every soul be paid what it earned, and none shall be dealt with unjustly.  (The Noble Quran, 2:281)"

"But how (will they fare) when we gather them together against a day about which there is no doubt, and each soul will be paid out just what it has earned, without (favour or) injustice?  (The Noble Quran, 3:25)"

"On the Day when every soul will be confronted with all the good it has done, and all the evil it has done, it will wish there were a great distance between it and its evil. But God cautions you (To remember) Himself. And God is full of kindness to those that serve Him.  (The Noble Quran, 3:30)

While it is true that the inhabitants of Paradise will be in ranks (some higher than others), but the number 70,000 is not necessarily accurate, because only Allah Almighty Knows the Secrets of the Universe and who will make it to Heaven:

"With Him are the keys of the unseen, the treasures that none knoweth but He. He knoweth whatever there is on the earth and in the sea. Not a leaf doth fall but with His knowledge: there is not a grain in the darkness (or depths) of the earth, nor anything fresh or dry (green or withered), but is (inscribed) in a record clear (to those who can read).  (The Noble Quran, 6:59)"

"Verily God knows the secrets of the heavens and the earth: and God Sees well all that ye do.  (The Noble Quran, 49:18)"

"To God do belong the unseen (secrets) of the heavens and the earth, and to Him goeth back every affair (for decision): then worship Him, and put thy trust in Him: and thy Lord is not unmindful of aught that ye do.  (The Noble Quran, 11:123)"

"He said: "O Adam! Tell them their natures." When he had told them, God said: "Did I not tell you that I know the secrets of heaven and earth, and I know what ye reveal and what ye conceal?"  (The Noble Quran, 2:33)"

"God will not leave the believers in the state in which ye are now, until He separates what is evil from what is good nor will He disclose to you the secrets of the Unseen. But He chooses of His Apostles (For the purpose) whom He pleases. So believe in God. And His apostles: And if ye believe and do right, ye have a reward without measure.  (The Noble Quran, 3:179)"

"Say: "God knows best how long they stayed: with Him is (the knowledge of) the secrets of the heavens and the earth: how clearly He sees, how finely He hears (everything)! They have no protector other than Him; nor does He share His Command with any person whatsoever.  (The Noble Quran, 18:26)"

 

Many Hadiths (Sayings of Prophet Muhammad) are forged!


Here is the Proof:

"A section of the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) say:  Believe in the morning what is revealed to the believers (Muslims), but reject it at the end of the day; perchance they may (themselves) turn back (from Islam).  (The Noble Quran, Noble Verse 3:72)"

Like I mentioned above, there are close to 2,000,000 hadith narrations today.   This by itself should be sufficient enough to prove that most of the hadiths today are doubtful - exactly like the Bible.  Add to that that many during Prophet Muhammad's times were hypocrites, and Allah Almighty warned us from them.  As we clearly see in Noble Verse 3:72, Allah Almighty warned the Muslims and Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him from the hypocrites from the Jews and Christians who falsely embrace Islam and then leave it to create an impression to weak Muslims that Islam is not worth adopting.  Such hypocrites had also contributed in the corruptions of the hadiths.   But the Noble Quran remained Pure and 100% Perfect:

"We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly Guard it (from corruption).  (The Noble Quran, 15:9)"

"Nay, this is a Glorious Quran, (inscribed) in a Tablet Preserved!  (The Noble Quran, 85:21-22)"

To the reader, please visit:  The History of the Noble Quran's Preservation, Documentation and Compilation.

 

2-  In regards to Adam's creation and the sun and moon eclipses, again this narration also contradicts the Noble Quran:

"It is He who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon, all (the celestial bodies) swim along, each in its orbit with its own motion.  (The Noble Quran, 21:33)"


To the reader, please visit: The Noble Quran confirms that the earth is rotating around its axle.

Allah Almighty said that the earth is "egg-shaped".

The Earth is round according to Islam.

The amazing creation of earth and iron in the Noble Quran.   Iron came from space, and the Noble Quran mentioned it.

The amazing creation of earth and mountains in the Noble Quran.   Science confirms that mountains prevent the earth from shaking while it is revolving around itself.  The Noble Quran made a similar claim.

Geology in the Noble Quran - See the Scientific confirmation.

Oceanology in the Noble Quran - See the Scientific confirmation.  The barriers between waters in both science and the Noble Quran.

The darkness of oceans and disappearance of light was mentioned in the Noble Quran and confirmed by Science.

The Noble Quran and Astronomers both claim that the Universe is 18 billion years old.

The Big Bang Theory and the Cosmic Crunch in the Noble Quran.  Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him predicted around the time when the Cosmic Crunch occurs, the Sun would rise from the West.

The Noble Quran on the Origin of the Universe. This article has pictures and quotes from Western scientific books that accurately confirm the astronomical claims of the Noble Quran.  The Noble Quran was the only book that claimed that the universe originated from Hot Gas or Smoke.  Science proved that this claim is true.

The explosion of Stars (FORMING RED ROSES), Galaxies and the Universe in the Noble Quran had been confirmed by NASA.

Comparison between Allah Almighty's claims about His Creation, and the scientific discoveries that 100% agree with Him.  Claims such as:  The universe is expanding, the existence of the sun's orbit, the protective atmosphere to the earth, Embryology and many more.

Allah Almighty said in the Noble Quran that He is "Expanding" the Universe.  Scientists already proved this claim to be true.

The "Clot" and the Creation of the Universe in the Noble Quran.

Is there mention of U.F.Os or other Human Planets in the Noble Quran?

What does the sun orbit?

Einstein's time relativity in the Noble Quran.

UFOs and Space Shuttles were explicitly mentioned in the Noble Quran!  Even the communication with UFOs was prophesied in the Noble Quran.

Aliens and UFOs in the Noble Quran.

 

3-  In regards to the reason why Martyrs are not washed is NOT because the blood of their "victims" is a "badge of honor" as you said.  It's because the Martyr's blood will turn into Musk in Resurrection, and Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him ordered for the body not to be washed so the Martyr would not be deprived from such Musk.

 

Also Mr. stupid, how can a Martyr's "victim's blood" be on him?  The Martyr GOT KILLED!  How can he have any "victim's" blood on him when he himself is the "victim"??!!

 

 

He wrote:

    With Muhammad’s agenda in mind, let’s march ahead. Tabari I:335 “Seth stayed in Mecca performing the hajj pilgrimage and the lesser umrah until he died. He added the scrolls revealed by Allah to those of his father, Adam, and acted in accordance with their contents. He built the Ka’aba with stones and clay.” If the Ka’aba gets one more builder it’s going to become the Tower of Babel.
    In the interim, we have scrolls of babel: “The people of the Torah said, ‘Enoch was born to Jared. Allah granted him the gift of prophecy. He revealed thirty scrolls to him. He was the first after Adam to write and to exert himself in Allah’s Cause [Jihad]. He was the first to cut and sew clothes. He was the first to lead some of Cain’s descendants into captivity and to enslave them.’” Not to be picky, but I thought that Eve was a stay-at-home mom. And I suppose fighting made Enoch the first good Muslim, a devout religious lad following in the footsteps of Muhammad.
    We now have one hundred scrolls. How is it then that the first mentioned in the Qur’an were from Abraham and Moses, who have yet to be born? Qur’an 87:18: “This is surely in the earlier Books, the Books of Abraham and Moses.”
    The next Hadith confirms the source of Muhammad’s religious material. Tabari I:346 “Someone among the people of the Torah said, ‘Methuselah was born to Enoch. He was the first to ride horses, because he followed his father’s prescribed practice with respect to the jihad.’” How could Adam have established a cavalry, as an earlier Hadith claimed (Tabari I:318), if he didn’t ride? Or why, if he didn’t fight?
    “The people of the Torah say that Lamech was born to Methuselah and that Lamech begat Noah.” But it is Muhammad who tells us in the Hadith that Noah’s people were just like the Meccans of his day: “Noah would admonish his people, but they mocked him. Allah revealed that he had given Noah’s people a postponement from punishment so that they might apologize. Noah’s people worshiped idols. So Allah sent His punishment down upon them and annihilated them.” Everything Muhammad claimed happened to Noah actually happened to him.
    Starting with the sixth chapter, Prophet of Doom will focus entirely on Muhammad’s life. Between now and then you should know that the Qur’an says it was actually Muhammad who “admonished his people, but they mocked him.” So “Allah revealed that He had given” the Meccans “a postponement from punishment so that they might apologize” to Muhammad.
    Thirty times in the Qur’an, and countless more in the Hadith, Muhammad replays this twisted variant of Noah. Each is designed to scare the Meccans into submission. By remaking Noah in his image, and recasting Meccans in the role of Noah’s people, Muhammad was able to make his impotent and vicious god appear capable of serving his prophet’s interests. This was an incredibly clever approach. Muhammad knew that his “god” wasn’t real, and thus Allah was incapable of miracles. So by ascribing a prior miracle to him, his toothless tiger grew fangs.
    This next Hadith forces us to make a choice. Either Noah was an Islamic prophet or Islam is a lie. Tabari I:353 “According to a report on the authority of early Muslim scholars, there were ten generations between Adam and Noah, all of them were followers of Islam. Unbelief originated only in the generation to whom Noah was sent. Noah was the first prophet to be sent by Allah as a Messenger to a people to warn them and call them to the recognition of the oneness of Allah. Some say that Noah’s people committed wickedness, drinking wine, and letting their preoccupation with musical instruments divert them from submission to Allah.” If you are agonizing over whether Muhammad has told the truth, think about this: he said “drinking wine” was “wicked” and yet the rivers of Allah’s Paradise “flow with wine.” Muhammad condemned those who “listened to music,” and yet “the angels sing.”
    “The Qur’an reports that they had idols, for Allah says speaking about Noah, ‘My Lord they have been disobedient to me and have followed one whose property and children only add to his loss.’” The real Noah never said such a thing. He wasn’t interested in someone submitting to him; he had property and sons. When we reconcile why Muhammad put these awkward words into Noah’s mouth we discover that it was actually Islam’s prophet who demanded obedience and was denied. It was Muhammad who had neither sons nor property. What’s more, the official heirs to the Ka’aba, the property he coveted, had sons.
    “They have devised a major plot and said, ‘Don’t give up your gods. Don’t give up Wadd, Suwa, and Nasr. They have led many astray.’” [Qur’an 71:21] While Noah never plotted, Muhammad schemed against his own family for control of a similar list of false gods. Falsely projecting one’s faults upon an opponent is an effective and timeless political strategy. It’s one Muhammad used to perfection. It is one of the Qur’an’s least appealing and most repetitive themes.
    Fearing god’s terror, however, is unique to Islam. Tabari I:354 “Allah sent Noah to them to make them afraid of His awesome power and to warn them of His assault. Noah was to call upon them to act in accordance with the demands given by Allah to His messengers and revealed by Him in the scrolls of Adam, Seth, and Enoch.” Like most Islamic Traditions, this one was written to explain the Qur’an, to provide a sense of purpose and place to a book that lacks context, history, and chronology. As we dive into the surah for which this was written, notice the similarity between Muhammad’s voice and Allah’s.
    071.001 “Surely We sent Noah to his people, saying: ‘Warn your people before there comes upon them a painful punishment.’ He said: ‘O my people! Surely I am a warner to you that you should fear Him and obey me.’” Why Muhammad had Noah's say such things will become increasingly obvious. But before we leave this opening verse, I'd like to point out one of the many differences between the Qur'an and the Bible. Biblical
prophets told us to love and obey Yahweh, not themselves. Islam's prophet ordered Muslims to fear Allah and obey Muhammad.
    The following verse replicates Muhammad’s experience in Mecca down to the smallest nuance. 071.003 “He said: ‘I have called my people night and day! But my call has only made them flee the more. They put their fingers in their ears and persist, puffed up with pride.’” 071.008 “Then I called to them aloud. I spoke to them in public and I spoke to them in secret. I said, ‘Ask forgiveness of your Lord. He will send down upon you the cloud, pouring down abundance of rain, and help you with wealth and sons, and make for you gardens, and make for you rivers.’” Holy cloudburst. This is a sadistic joke. The last thing Noah’s clan needed was rain. But since this story was being recast for Muhammad’s tribe in central Arabia, a place that was desperate for water, the reward must have seemed divine. So to make Noah look like a mini-Muhammad, the victims of the flood were to be rewarded with a deluge. How’s that for a twist?
    071.013 “What is the matter with you that you do not fear Allah? He has created you through various grades. Do you not see how He has created the seven heavens, one above another, and made the moon a light, and made the sun a lamp? ...Allah has made you grow out of the earth as a growth.” The harder Muhammad tried to prove Allah was actually god; the less godly Allah actually appeared.
    In this next verse Allah’s words are virtually identical to Muhammad’s in an earlier Hadith. It makes you wonder who was speaking for whom. 071.021 “Noah said, ‘Lord, they have disobeyed me and followed him whose wealth and children have added to him nothing but loss. And they have planned a very great plot. And they say: “By no means leave your gods, nor leave Wadd, Suwa and Nasr.”’” We have traversed time and brought Noah into Muhammad’s Mecca. Only the names have been changed to protect the guilty. The Meccan gods’ names were Manat, Al-Lat, and Al-Uzza while their Arabian rivals were Wadd, Suwa, and Nasr.
    071.024 “They have led astray many. Because of their wrongs they were drowned, then made to enter fire, so they did not find any helpers besides Allah. [How was Allah a helper if they were drowned and roasted?] And Noah said: ‘My Lord, leave not one of the unbelievers on the earth. For surely if You leave them they will lead astray Your slaves, and will not beget any but immoral, ungrateful children.’” Saying that Noah asked God to wipe out his people is a sacrilege. Nothing could be further from the truth.
    But by saying this, the Qur’an has given us a window into the soul of its prophet. It was Muhammad who wanted his clan punished, not Noah. The Meccans mocked Muhammad, so he threatened to slaughter them. And while you will read these words later, directly from Muhammad’s lips, for now he’s too big a weasel to stand up and accept responsibility. His thoughts have been attributed to another, besmirching a noble man’s character.  So ask yourself: why would the Qur’an put such ugly words on Noah’s lips? What did Muhammad have to gain by deceiving his people? These lies didn’t spontaneously combust; there must have been a motive. And if there was a motive, the lie was more than immoral; it became criminal.   

While the Qur’anic account of Noah is foolish and mean-spirited, these things aren’t crimes, nor is making a mistake. Lying is, however, when it’s done for material gain. Today we call it fraud. The legal definition is: deceit or trickery designed to garner an unfair or dishonest advantage. Fraud is a knowing departure from truth to purposely mislead others for the sole purpose of unwarranted material gain. That’s precisely what is happening here.
    During this phase of Muhammad’s “ministry” in Mecca he wanted his tribe to abandon all the Ka’aba gods except Allah—the idol that had “called” him to be its prophet. In this verse Muhammad went on the attack, saying that the lesser idols needed to go so that his idol, and his idol’s messenger, could gain control over the Ka’aba Inc.—the town’s religious scam. The power and wealth Muhammad coveted flowed into the pockets of those who controlled Allah’s House. So Muhammad was willing to deceive his kin to garner an unfair advantage over them for material gain. Islam’s prophet profited by perpetrating a fraud. A crime has been committed.
    Fortunately, a little outcome-based math will help lighten the mood. “Allah sent Noah to his people when he was 350 years old. He stayed among them 950 years. Allah sent Noah to them when he was 480 [not 350] years old. Allah commanded Noah to build the ark. He boarded it at the age of 600 [not at 1300].” Can you imagine attending an Islamic math class?
    “All those people drowned.” Maybe the Islamic Noah’s preaching wasn’t any more positive than Muhammad’s. Tabari I:358 “Noah’s people used to grab him and choke him until he became unconscious. When Allah wanted to ruin them, Noah cursed them, saying, ‘Lord, they have disobeyed me and have followed one whose property and children only add to his loss…Lord, let no unbeliever stay on the earth!’” The Hadith says that the worst abuse Muhammad endured in Mecca was being grabbed and choked. And as a result of being disobeyed, Muhammad cursed his people. Every word of this is designed to recast the Biblical patriarch into the spitting image of Muhammad.
    Early Muslims had a problem keeping their stories straight and their facts believable. “The length of Noah’s [supertanker] ark was 1,200 cubits, and its width was 600 cubits.” A nearly four thousand-foot boat—improbabilities like this in supposedly inspired scripture are troubling…or telling.
    Listen to this: Tabari I: 367 “The Apostles said to Jesus, ‘Would you send us a man who saw the ark and could tell us about it.’ He took a handful of the earth in his palm and asked, ‘Do you know what this is?’” While it is hard to believe they couldn’t answer the question, it provides an insight into Islam. Muslims don’t think, they obey. “‘Allah and His prophet know best!’ they replied. Jesus said, ‘This is the grave of Noah’s son, Ham.’ He struck the hill with his staff and said, ‘Rise with Allah’s permission!’ And behold there was Ham, with gray hair, shaking the earth from his head.” With a miracle of this magnitude, you’d think the Apostles would have at least mentioned it in their Gospels. But they didn’t, I suppose, because it didn’t happen. What’s more, if Jesus resurrected a relative nobody like Ham, why didn’t Allah empower Muhammad, his most important messenger, to bring Abraham back to life, or Moses? Or Jesus, for that matter.
    “Jesus asked him whether he had perished in that state with gray hair. Ham replied, ‘No when I died, I was a young man, but I thought the Hour [of Doom] had come, and my hair turned gray.’ Jesus said, ‘Tell us about Noah’s ark.’ He said, ‘It was 1,200 cubits long and 600 cubits wide. It had three stories, one for domestic and wild animals, another for human beings, and a third for birds. When the dung of the animals became excessive, Allah inspired Noah to tickle the elephant’s tail. He did, and a male and female hog fell down and attacked the dung. When the rat fell down into the seams of the planks of the ark and gnawed at them, Allah inspired Noah to strike the lion between its eyes and a male and female cat came out from its nose and attacked the rat.’” Where does one sign up for a religion like this?
    “Jesus asked Ham, ‘How did Noah learn that all the places had been under water?’ He replied, ‘He sent the raven to bring him information, but it found a corpse and pounced upon it, whereupon Noah cursed the raven that it should be fearful; therefore the raven does not like houses. He sent the dove. It came with an olive leaf in its beak and clay on its feet. Noah thus knew….’ The Apostles said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, why do you not bring him to our people so that he can sit down and talk with us?’ Jesus replied, ‘How could one who has no sustenance [substance?] follow you?’ Jesus said to Ham, ‘Go back with Allah’s permission.’ And Ham turned to dust again.”
    Rather than jump into the middle of the Qur’an’s second version of the deluge, I’d like to sneak up on it so that you might begin to see how Allah manages to weave in his favorite themes. 011.001 “This is a Book [I beg to differ. That simply wasn’t true. The Qur’an wouldn’t become a book for three decades or more. Most of the revelations weren’t even written down. And when the first scribe assigned to Muhammad actually tried to jot some down, he was assassinated.] whose verses are made decisive, then are they made plain, from the Wise, All-aware, [He is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. This is a statement of opinion, as unsubstantiated as it may be.] that you shall not serve any but Allah; surely I am a warner for you from Him and a giver of good news.”
    011.012 “Then, it may be that you [Muhammad] will give up part of what is revealed to you…because they say: ‘Why has not a treasure been sent down upon him or an angel come to him?’” The things that bugged Muhammad and the Meccans the most were: no money and no proof. The prophet was born into the wealthiest family in Mecca, the custodians of the Ka’aba. Being Allah’s keeper had made his kin rich. But not Muhammad, he was abandoned at birth. Dirt poor, he envied—no despised—his own family, cursed them and coveted the wealth they derived from the family religious scam.
    The prophet’s tormentors wanted to know why a god who had made them rich would leave his messenger poor. They wanted to know why there weren’t any miracles if Allah was so powerful. Muhammad was comparing himself to Moses and Jesus. “They did miracles. They were visited by angels. Why not you?” the Meccans probed.
    As an interesting aside, the verse asks: “Why hasn’t an angel come to him?” The 11th surah was late Meccan, the seventy-fifth in order of revelation. The man who claimed his “revelations” were angelic, had yet to see an angel.
    The Qur’an is comprised of a raw and raging debate. Muhammad’s tribe disputed his claims and mocked him unmercifully, saying his religion was a forgery, a counterfeit. 011.013 “Or, do they say: ‘He (Muhammad) has forged it (the Qur’an).’” His contemporaries knew he was a fraud. And they weren’t the least bit shy about saying so. They described him with the same words I am using.
    So how do you think Muhammad answered this charge? “Say: ‘Then bring ten forged surahs like it and call upon whom you can besides Allah, if you are truthful.’” The Qur’an is saying that this rubbish smells so sweet it can’t be garbage. “No one, short of the great Allah himself, is capable of such a wondrous forgery.” If that’s not delusional, Webster needs to redefine the word.
    There were many who rose to the challenge, creating vastly superior prose. Such enlightened men and women were called poets. Oral recitals were the only means of communication because the Bedouins of Muhammad’s day were illiterate. And having read the Prologue, you know how our hero rewarded the poets who “brought chapters like it.” He assassinated them. Dead men tell no tales. 011.014 “But if they do not answer you, then know that it is revealed by Allah’s knowledge and no god may be worshiped but He; will you submit?” Submit. Not agree. Not understand. Not even believe. Islam is submission.
    Have you ever heard a politician say, “Let me make this perfectly clear?” At that moment all you know for certain is that his or her position is anything but clear. Allah uses the phrase “clear proof” in defense of Muhammad with great regularity. Yet he never provides any proof—clear or otherwise. 011.017 “Is [Muhammad] he who has with him clear proof (the Qur’an) from his Lord, a witness from Him reciting it and before it came the Book of Moses? These believe in it; but most men do not believe. The different sects (Jews, Christians, and all other non-Muslim nations) will reject (the Qur’an), so the Fire of Hell will be their promised meeting place.”
    A second insight here is “most men do not believe.” After ten years of preaching to his hometown this prophet inspired less than fifty men. Muhammad was a complete failure as a religious prophet. Islam, the religion of submission, failed in Mecca when Muhammad relied on his words. Islam, the political doctrine of submission succeeded in Medina when Muhammad relied on his sword. Had Muhammad not changed from prophet to pirate, we wouldn’t have heard of him and his followers wouldn’t be killing us today.
    Speaking of the Jewish and Christian “sects,” and non-Muslim nations, the Qur’an asks: 011.017 “Who is more unjust than he who forges a lie against Allah? … Surely the curse of Allah is on them…and the punishment shall be doubled for them.” Allah, like Muhammad, was eager to curse and punish those who didn’t capitulate.
  
 
Let’s examine the forgeries. As we do, notice the number of times Allah says “surely,” which could be translated as, “trust me.” 011.025 “Surely We sent Noah to his people: ‘Surely I am a warner for you that you shall not serve any but Allah, surely I fear for you the punishment of a painful day.’ But the chiefs of those who disbelieved from among his people said: ‘We do not consider you but a mortal like ourselves, and we do not see any who have followed you but those who are the meanest of us. We do not see in you any excellence over us. Nay, we deem you a liar.’” If we were to simply substitute speakers, Muhammad for Noah, we could dispense with the core of the Meccan surahs and replace them with this bogus bill.
    011.028 “Noah said: ‘O my people, tell me if I have come with clear proofs from my Lord….but I consider you a people who are ignorant.’” Islam’s counterfeit Noah said: 011.030 “Will you not mind? I do not say to you that I have the treasures of Allah and I do not know the unseen, nor do I say that I am an angel.” This is also transparent. Noah is saying on behalf of Muhammad that he is powerless to get his people to mind. He doesn’t have god’s wealth, his insights, or angelic support. He’s a prophet who can’t predict the future. By corrupting Noah in this way, Muhammad infers that all of god’s messengers were equally inept.
    011.032 “They said: ‘Noah, you have disputed with us at length, therefore bring to us what you threaten us with, if you are truthful.’ [The Meccans demanded the same thing and Muhammad’s response was identical.] He said: ‘Allah only will bring it to you if He pleases, and you will not escape. I intend to give you good advice, but my advice will not profit you if Allah intends to lead you astray.’ Or do they say: ‘He has forged it? Say: ‘If I have forged it, on me is my guilt.’” If this were really god speaking, one would think he’d be a little less transparent with his agenda. Recasting Noah this blatantly, this crassly, as Muhammad, would only fool a fool.
    Next, the Qur’an reveals the problem of predestination: 011.036 “It was revealed to Noah: ‘None of your people will believe except those who have already believed, therefore do not grieve at what they do. Make the ark before Our eyes and do not speak to Me in respect of those who are unjust; surely they shall be drowned.’” In other words, “Don’t preach to your brothers and sisters, sons and daughters, friends and family. Don’t love them; don’t pray for their souls. I’ve got other plans for them.”
    011.038 “And he began to make the ark; and whenever the chiefs from among his people passed by him they laughed at him. He said: ‘If you laugh at us, surely we laugh at you. So shall you know whom a chastisement will disgrace, and on whom will lasting punishment come down.’” Muhammad hated being scoffed at. So while we’re on the subject of mockery, let’s review a few of the four hundred variations of this theme in the Qur’an. All are allegedly from Allah, and all are in defense of Muhammad. In surah 2:14: “We were joking. But Allah will turn the joke against them.” In surah 2:212: “Enamored are the unbelievers and they scoff at the faithful.” In surah 5:55: “O believers, do not make friends with those who mock and make a sport of your faith, those who were given the [Bible] Book before you.” And from 6:10: “Surely the apostles have been mocked before you; but what they had mocked rebounded on the mockers themselves.” It’s a broken record—one that required Muhammad to break the record of history so that no one would notice how odd it was for god and prophet to constantly mock their mockers.
    011.040 “Our command came and water flowed forth from the valley. ‘Embark in it, in the name of Allah be its sailing and its anchoring; most surely my Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.’” The idea that the ark had sails and an anchor is as incongruous in the context of a flood as depicting Allah as forgiving and merciful. His callous slap on Adam’s back sealed our fate. Being predestined to the fires of hell precludes forgiveness and mercy. They are mutually exclusive, which means one or both statements must be false. Not good if you’re pretending to be God.
    Within the Biblical account from which this tale was forged there is considerable truth. Yahweh was indeed grieved over man’s behavior. He created us in his image, with a spiritual component, so that we could have a relationship with him. But we, as we have a tendency to do, acted badly. Fortunately, rather than giving up on us entirely and letting us prematurely disintegrate into the barbaric mentality of the twentieth century, Yahweh opted for a fresh start. He saved those who chose to be with him. He told Noah to build an ark as a means of salvation—separating Noah and Yahweh from those who had chosen a less godly path.
    Noah, like all men created in God’s image at the time, lived near the Garden of Eden, at the headwaters of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. That put him quite near the Black Sea. There is overwhelming evidence of a flood of Biblical proportions there. Traces of human settlements dating to Noah’s day have been discovered buried under the shores of this inland ocean.
    The Bible gives us evidence of an old earth and “humans” apart from spirit-filled man—man created in God’s image. Yahweh instructed Noah to cover the ark with pitch—the residue of dead plants, animals, and time. He also talked to Noah about the sons of God marrying the daughters of men. And Yahweh told us that he put a mark on Cain’s forehead so that others would know that he was under his protection. If mom and dad were the only humans, that would have served no purpose.
    I share these insights because I want you to know several things. When Yahweh said that he made us out of the same elements from which he made the animals he was speaking of humans—Homo sapiens. Adam was a special creation—made of the same raw material but with one important difference. Yahweh breathed his spirit into Adam, creating us with a spiritual dimension.
    The Garden of Eden was perfect, walled and guarded, protecting Adam from the death and dying that was occurring all around him—outside of God’s protection. But ultimately Adam chose poorly, as did most of his descendants. And that brought us to Noah, his ark of salvation, and a very real flood that led to this new beginning.
    The Qur’an follows its revisionist account of Noah’s with another fairytale: 011.050 “To Ad We sent Hud. He said: ‘O my people, serve Allah, you have no ilah (God) other than He. You are nothing but forgers of lies.… Allah will send on you clouds pouring down abundance of rain.’” The legendary Hud is giving the mythical Ad the same speech. And that’s a problem. It reveals that Allah lacks imagination, an editor, and a memory. The story of the Ad is repeated eleven times. And elsewhere in the Qur’an, Allah says that the Ad were blown away, not flooded. In surah 15 we read: “So those who were Ad turned insolent unjustly in the land, and said, ‘Who is stronger than us?’ Did they not see that Allah who created them was far greater in power than they? Yet they refused to believe Our signs so We let loose on them a violent wind for several days of distress to make them taste a most disgraceful punishment here in this world, and far more shameful will be the punishment in hell. They will have no savior.”
    The story of Noah and his supertanker continued by informing us that Ham made the boat and that he had a brother, Yam. Yam is the unnamed son mentioned in Qur’an 11:42. And then: Tabari I:360 “The first animal to be put aboard was the ant, and the last the donkey. When Noah brought the donkey in, Iblis [Lucifer] attached himself to its tail, so that it could not lift its legs. Noah started to say, ‘Woe to you. Go in.’ The donkey rose but was unable to move. Noah said, ‘Woe to you. Go in even if Satan is with you.’ It was a slip of the tongue, but when Noah said it, Satan let the donkey proceed. It went in, and Satan went in with it. [Lucifer and his fellow jinn must have been deathly afraid of water. Being made of fire, they would have been snuffed out, I suppose.] Noah said, ‘How did you get in here with me?’ Satan replied, ‘You cannot escape from having me on board.’ Satan stayed in the rear of the boat.”
    There was a reason for the Satanic slip. Muhammad’s most embarrassing moment, the Satanic Verses, was called a slip of the lip. He said that Satan put words in his mouth when he acknowledged Mecca’s pagan idols in return for a bribe. This story was designed to drag Noah down to his level.
    Then, straight out of Islam’s warped mind we learn: “Noah also carried along Adam’s corpse, making it a barrier between the women and men.” Since they were all married and from the same family, why? “They boarded the boat on the 10th of Rajab and they left on Ashura Day, therefore all people should fast on Ashura. Before the Flood, two sons were reportedly born to Noah who both perished. One was called Canaan. He was drowned in the flood.” Well, if you don’t believe that, and you shouldn’t, what about this: “All the forefathers between Noah and Adam were in the state of Islam.” Yes, all the Bible characters were good Muslims.
    “The ark carried them around the entire Earth in six months. It did not come to rest anywhere until it came to the Sacred Territory of Mecca and Medina. [We should have guessed.] However, it did not enter the Sacred Territory but circled around for a week. [Circumnavigation must have preceded circumambulation.] The House built by Adam was lifted up, so that it was not submerged—the inhabited House with the Black Stone.” Since every soul was aboard the ark, the only thing that could have “inhabited the House with the Black Stone” was Allah. In other words, the Ka’aba wasn’t a shrine to the Islamic god as Muslims would have us believe; Allah lived there.
    “The oven with the water boiling that Allah made as sign between Himself and Noah was the oven of stone that belonged to Eve.… On Friday, the 10th of Rajab it took off. It passed the House, which had been lifted up by Allah so it would not be submerged. Noah circumnavigated it seven times. It then went to Yemen and returned.” Ar-Rahman lived in Yemen; Muhammad didn’t want to leave him out.
    With these words we say goodbye to Volume I of Tabari: “The eras were: from the Flood to the fire of Abraham, from the fire of Abraham to the mission of Joseph, from the mission of Joseph to the mission of Moses, from the mission of Moses to the reign of Solomon, from the reign of Solomon to the mission of Jesus, and from the mission of Jesus, to when the Messenger of Allah was sent.” So what happened? Did Allah run out of Jews? And since every era is centered around Jerusalem, including Muhammad’s only trip to heaven, why is Mecca sacred? Fact is, Mecca didn’t exist—nor would it exist for another 3,500 years.

 

My response:

The points that you mentioned were:

1-  Muhammad made himself like Noah to scare Meccans and cause them to submit to "his god".

2-  Allah is a false god.


Here is my response to your points:

Before I do that, I just want the reader to know that your sarcastic and stupid remarks, comments and jokes hold no value and reveal only stupidity on your part, because you failed to provide any quote or evidence to back them up.   To you, if a quote does not look right, then its ok to make stupid jokes about it.

As I explained above, the narrations of Al-Tabari and other sources of the hadiths are all doubtful, just like your pornful bible; the book of women's breasts and vaginas taste like "wine".  But since you like to make sarcastic statements about quotes that you dislike, then I'd like to see your reaction and stupid remarks about the following from your STUPIDEST OF ALL pornful bible:


Terrorism:

There are several Verses in the Bible that seem to be very cruel.  Let us look at few of them:

Let us look at Numbers 31:17 "Now kill all the boys [innocent kids]. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man." 

Also, let us look at Numbers 31:35-40 "[From the captives of war] 32,000 women who had never slept with a man.......of which the tribute for the LORD was 32 [virgin women]."

Why kill the innocent children?  Why kill all of the non-virgin women?  Back then, it was only men who fought men in wars.  Women rarely fought in battle fields.   So what crime did the innocent children and the non-virgin women do?

This verse was sent to me by Yusif 65; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:  "But after they had moved it, the LORD's hand was against that city, throwing it into a great panic.  He afflicted the people of the city, both young and old, with an outbreak of tumors.  (From the NIV Bible, 1 Samuel 5:9)"  

"tumors" was defined as "with tumors in the groin."  This is verified at this link.

Why torture the enemies by destroying their groins? 


Porn:

Comparing the sister's breasts to the size of the towers:   Let us look at the following verses:   "We have a young sister, and her breasts are not yet grown. What shall we do for our sister for the day she is spoken for?  (Song of Songs 8:8)"  and later about the sister....."I am a wall, and my breasts are like towers. Thus I have become in his eyes like one bringing contentment.  (Song of Songs 8:10)

Let us look at Song of Songs 4:5 "Your two breasts are like two fawns, like twin fawns of a gazelle that browse among the lilies." 

Praising the bed that they had sex on:   Let us look at Song of Songs 1:16 "How handsome you are, my lover! Oh, how charming! And our bed is verdant"  

Having sex all night long: Let us look at Proverbs 7:18 "Come, let's drink deep of love till morning; let's enjoy ourselves with love!" 

Sleeping with his sister: Let us look at Song of Songs 5:4 "I slept but my heart was awake. Listen! My lover is knocking: 'Open to me, my sister, my darling, my dove, my flawless one. My head is drenched with dew, my hair with the dampness of the night.'  I have taken off my robe [showed off his groin in other words] must I put it on again? I have washed my feet, must I soil them again?  My lover thrust his hand through the latch-opening; my heart began to pound for him."  What a disgusting way for someone to talk so pervertly about his sister like that!!.

Her vagina tastes like wine:  "How beautiful your sandaled feet, O prince's daughter! Your graceful legs are like jewels, the work of a craftsman's hands.  Your navel is a rounded goblet that never lacks blended wine.   Your waist is a mound of wheat encircled by liliesYour breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle.  Your neck is like an ivory tower.  Your eyes are the pools of Heshbon by the gate of Bath Rabbi.
.......
I said 'I will climb the palm tree; I will take hold of its fruit.'  May your breasts be like the clusters of the vine, the fragrance of your breath like apples, and your mouth like the best wine. 
(The NIV Bible, Song of Songs 7:1-4, 8-9)

According to the movie "Sex in the Bible" on A&E TV Station, the Hebrew translation to "Your naval" is referring to the woman's VAGINA.  The English translators substituted the word "NAVEL" WITH "VAGINA."  Please rent a copy of the movie and watch it.  This was sent to me by my dear brother in Islam Mike who embraced Islam just recently; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him.


Contradictions with Science:

Earth is flat, has edges, standing on pillars and never moves:

"He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved.   (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"

"The LORD reigns, he is robed in majesty; the LORD is robed in majesty and is armed with strength.  The world [The deceiving translators should've said "earth", not "world"] is firmly established; it cannot be moved.   (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 93:1)"

"Say among the nations, "The LORD reigns."   The world [Again, the deceiving translators should've said "earth", not "world"] is firmly established, it cannot be moved; he will judge the peoples with equity.  (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 96:10)"

"The sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises.  (From the NIV Bible, Ecclesiastes 1:5)"

"He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble.  (From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"

"Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand.  (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"

"that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it?  (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"

"He unleashes his lightning beneath the whole heaven and sends it to the ends of the earth.  (From the NIV Bible, Job 37:3)"

"for he views the ends of the earth and sees everything under the heavens.  (From the NIV Bible, Job 28:24)"

"Their measure is longer than the earth and wider than the sea.  (From the NIV Bible, Job 11:9)"

 

What are your dumb remarks about the above STUPIDITY in your pornful bible?



As to your points above, here is my response to them:

1-  Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was a Prophet like Noah, peace be upon him, and therefore, they both do have similarities in the situations that they dealt with with their people.   They both were rejected and dealt with much hostility by the disbelievers.  If the narrations above from Al-Tabari were true (since I have shown above that the hadiths are all doubtful like your pornful bible), then there is nothing wrong with them, because for our Prophet to try to scare his people from Allah Almighty's Wrath and to take them away from idol worship to only worshipping the Absolute One and True GOD Almighty is indeed a Great Accomplishment.

To the reader, please visit:  What parts of the Bible and Hadiths do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth, and Why?

 

2-  As to Allah Almighty being a "false god", the following detailed section will clearly refute this ridiculous statement that many ignorant Jews and Christians keep claiming:

From www.answering-christianity.com/allah.htm:

The word "Allah" does exist in the original Bible:

"Allah" is GOD's Name, "Elaw" means "GOD" in Aramaic: How can they be the same?  I clearly proved from the Noble Quran that "Allah" means the Supreme GOD Almighty in Arabic.

The original name in the Bible for GOD is not "Yahweh".   It is "Allah".  See the proofs from Jewish and Christian sources.  I also proved that "Yahweh" wasn't even the first thing GOD Almighty was called in the Bible.  I also addressed the Arabic Bible's self-contradiction for using both "Allah" and "Yahweh" for GOD Almighty.

This excellent article shows from Hebrew sources that Genesis 1:1 used "Allah".   If the site is down, you can view the article from my site.

"GOD" in Arabic and Aramaic sound the same, and it is "Allah".

The name of GOD Almighty: Allah or Yahweh?

The word "Allah" as the name of GOD in the Book of Ezra in the Aramaic Bible.

GOD:  What is His name?  Written by Sheikh Ahmed Deedat with great references from Arabic and Hebrew sources.

The word "Allah" in the Arabic Bible.   See captured images from the Arabic Bible.

Jewish and Christian Arabs used the word "Allah" for GOD before Islam.  See historical evidence and most recent discoveries in the Middle East.

Arab Christian Theologians believe that "Allah" is GOD Almighty.

Is Allah really a "moon god"?   It's funny how some anti-Islamics claim this, while the Noble Quran directly refutes this: "Among His Sings are the Night and the Day, and the Sun and the Moon. Adore not the sun and the moon, but adore God, Who created them, if it is Him ye wish to serve.  (The Noble Quran, 41:37)"

 

Rebuttals and Further Sites to Research:

Rebuttal to the "Allah originated from pagan gods" lie article.

http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/lordexarkun/Islam/a-word.html   The word Allah comes from the original Bible.

http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/lordexarkun/Islam/moongod.html   Refutes the "Allah is a Moon god" lie.

Rebuttal to the lie about the Arabic name "Eesa (Jesus)" originating from Hindu and Pagan gods.

Jesus preached in Aramaic during his ministry.

http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Quran/Sources/Allah/moongod.html (Allah Almighty is not a moon god).

The moon god lie against Islam.

Yahweh is a pagan god.  The title for the pagan god was originally "Yahweh" or "Jehovah".

The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

 

 

He wrote:

The Genesis account of Abraham begins in the 12th chapter. It’s a wonderful story about Yahweh’s relationship with man and his covenant with his people. It is also prophetic, warning us about the character of Ishmael and his descendants: “He will be a wild ass of a man. His hand will be against his brother and his brother’s hand will be against him. And he will live in hostility with all the world.” Sounds like tomorrow’s newspaper, doesn’t it?
    The Islamic version of Abraham unfolds with these words: Tabari II:49Most of the earlier sages have said that Abraham was born during the era of Nimrod bin Cush, while most historians say that Nimrod was an official of Azdahaq. Some have asserted that Noah was sent to Nimrod, against Babylon. We have been told—though Allah knows best—that Dahhak was Nimrod and that Abraham was born during his days, and that Nimrod was his master who wanted to burn him.” I beg to differ with the Muslim sages. But since nothing they have said thus far has made any sense, why start now?
    I suppose you’d like to know who Azdahaq, Nimrod, and Dahhak are. While Nimrod is mentioned in the Bible, I’ll defer to the Muslims with regard to Azdahaq. They say, Tabari II:3 “Qarishat was tyrannical. One day he became engrossed in thought…Allah transformed him into Azdahaq. He had seven heads and was the one who lived on the highest mountain in Iran. All the historians, both Arab and Persian, claim that he ruled over every clime and that he was a wicked sorcerer.”
    So with that cleared up, lets see what the Islamic scholars have to say about Dahhak, whom they believe to be Nimrod. “Dahhak reigned for one thousand years after Jam—but Allah knows better. He ruled over all the earth, displaying tyranny and oppression. He killed excessively and was the first to enact the punishments of crucifixion and mutilation. [I don’t know about mutilation, but crucifixion was developed by the Assyrians and perfected by the Romans.] He was the first to levy tithes [religious tax] and to mint dirhams.” If Dahhak was Nimrod, the great Babylonian king, he was a murdering tyrant. He was also creative. According to the archeological evidence, Nimrod and his wife Semiramis invented the pagan practices that grew to become the basis of Egyptian, Greek, and Roman mythology. His Mystery Babylon religion strongly influenced Hinduism, Islam, and Catholicism. Nimrod is credited with building the first temples, hiring the first clerics, and establishing the first rituals. He was the first to fleece the flock and to control a population via a religious scam. Muhammad would have looked up to Nimrod as a role model.
    This Islamic tradition goes on to claim, “It is said that there were two ganglia growing out of his shoulders, which caused pain. It became so intense he would anoint them with the brains of human beings. For this purpose he killed two men each day and anointed his ganglia with their brains. When he did, the pain would abate.” I’m pleased there is a cure for ganglia. Now all we need is a cure for Islam, for it too consumes men’s brains.
    Tabari II:4 “A commoner in Babylon rebelled against him. He set up a war banner and many people rallied. When Dahhak heard this he was alarmed and sent the following message: ‘What is the matter? What do you want?’ The man replied, ‘Do you not say that you are the ruler of the world, and that the world belongs to you?’” As a fellow megalomaniac, scam artist, and terrorist murder, Dahhak/Nimrod served to make Muhammad’s life seem sane, I suppose.
    Let’s compare the description we have just read to what Muhammad had to say about himself: Bukhari:V1B7N331 “The Prophet said, ‘I have been given five things which were not given to anyone else. Allah made me victorious with terror. The Earth was made for me…. Booty was made lawful for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else. I was given the right of intercession on the Day of Doom. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only, but I have been sent to all mankind.’” Chilling!
    Now that I have your attention, let’s return to the story. “The rebellious man said, ‘Let your thirst be for all the world and not only for us, for you only kill our people.’” Yes, there was a happier time in which Muslims only killed Muslims. Now they reach out and touch everyone. “Dahhak/Nimrod agreed and ordered that the two men slain each day would be divided among all people, not from just one nation.”
    “Dahhak was Nimrod and Abraham was born during his era…. Dahhak had been a rebel who had seized the people of the land with witchcraft and deceit and had completely terrified them with the two serpents which had been on his shoulders.” Let’s compare the Dahhak/Nimrod duo, which we are told are one in the same with another inseparable duo, Allah/Muhammad. From surah 3:151: “We shall strike terror into the hearts of unbelievers.” From 4:89: “Seize them and kill them wherever you find them.” In 4:142 we find: “Surely the hypocrites strive to deceive Allah, and He shall retaliate by deceiving them.” Then: Bukhari:V7B71N661 “Magic was worked on Allah’s Apostle and he was bewitched so that he began to imagine doing things which in fact, he had not done.” I’m sure these similarities are just a coincidence. After all, one indistinguishable pair claimed to be god and prophet; the other a witch and tyrant. As such, it would be wrong for them to have anything in common.
    “Dahhak/Nimrod built a city in Babylon called Harb [War]. He made Nabateans his couriers. The people were subjected to every kind of pressure, and he slew young boys.” In continuing with the similarities between Nimrod and Muhammad, you should know that the prophet pressured Arabs to submit to Islam. Those who didn’t were slain. Bukhari:V4B52N260 “The Prophet said, ‘If a Muslim discards his religion, kill him.’” Some would consider that “pressure.”
    In upcoming volumes of Tabari’s History and in Ishaq’s Sira we will be regaled with Hadith showing Muhammad murdering young boys. In one shameful episode he decapitated an entire tribe, slaughtering every boy over the age of twelve. The Muslim historians are making up these Nimrod myths in order to make Muhammad’s murderous behavior appear normal.
    To give this tall tale a religious slant, the Traditions wove Noah into the plot. This plagiarized, albeit twisted, account proclaims: Tabari II:11 “Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks.” Then after being told that “Noah slept with his genitals exposed,” we learn: “Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.” I wonder if Louis Farrakhan knows this? Probably not—he was too busy corrupting the sniper Muhammad.
    We have finally arrived at the real point of the Nimrod stories: Tabari II:18 “Nimrod was the son of Cush bin Canaan bin Ham bin Noah. He was the lord of Babylon and of Abraham.” Muslims were on solid ground so long as they stuck to the Biblical account, but the moment they left it, they buried themselves. Nimrod died seven hundred years before Abraham was born. And Muhammad told us that Canaan died in the flood.
    The actual history of the city-states of Babylon, Nineveh, and Ur is fascinating. This is where the stylus first met the tablet. It is out of the land of the Babylonians, Assyrians, and Chaldeans that recorded history began. It was here that the first laws were written, the first business was conducted, the first armies marched, the first students were taught, and the first sermons were preached. Their sermons and swords ultimately shaped the world—even unto our present day. Islam was derived in part from an offshoot of the religious scam concocted by Nimrod in Babylon. The original religion of Abraham in nearby Ur was based upon a derivative masculine moon deity named “Sin.” Moon-god shrines like the Ka’aba were erected to him all over Arabia with rites that mirrored those invented in Babylon.
    The people of the Fertile Crescent turned the sun, moon, and stars into gods and exported them at swordpoint. The constellations and planets were studied, and astrologists began the occult religions equating their movements to human behavior. This was the first time the masses were subjected to the will of cleric and king by way of divine right. It would not be the last.
    Many of Catholicism’s rituals, festivals, and doctrines were derived from Nimrod. The devotion to the virgin with child, priests as intermediaries between god and man, the celebration of Christmas, Lent, and Easter are but a few examples of religious trappings from Babylon, not the Bible.
    I share this with you not to expose Catholicism’s foundations, nor turn this into a mere history lesson, but so you might understand the nature of these Islamic religious traditions better. Up to this point, all we have had to work with is reason and internal contradiction to decide if Muhammad was telling the truth when he recast the Genesis accounts of creation, Adam, Satan, and Noah. Yes, they were incriminating, full of contradictions, and inaccuracies. And yes, Muhammad’s agenda of making Mecca and the Ka’aba important and his own rather unprophet-like behavior seem religious was always transparent. But now we have a new tool: history.
    Just as the Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls disprove Allah’s assertion that the Jews corrupted their scriptures, the clay tablets of Ur, Babylon, and Nineveh prove that Muhammad lied when he tried to reshape Abraham into a compatriot of Nimrod. And this lie is not without consequence. If Abraham was not as Allah claims, the Qur’an disintegrates. Abraham is the lone, thin string that connects Islam to the Bible. And without the  Bible, all that is rational and religious in the Qur’an evaporates, and Islam with it.
    Abraham’s story is repeated thirty times in the Qur’an in fifteen different surahs. We hear Adam’s tale of woe four times. Noah was a crowd pleaser; the mocked messenger makes thirty appearances in thirty different surahs. You just can’t get enough death and destruction. That’s why Lot, Abraham’s nephew and a relatively minor Biblical character, débuts no fewer than fifteen times. He too, was recast as Allah’s Messenger. The people didn’t obey, so wham—fire and brimstone. Moses, the great liberator, prophet, and miracle worker, was the most frequently named character in Allah’s book, with a stunning 500 appearances. The longest surah, the 2nd, was dedicated to the golden calf the Israelites foolishly crafted in the wilderness. The 10th surah is called “Jonah.” The 12th is named after and preoccupied with “Joseph.” The 14th is dedicated to “Abraham.” The 17th is named after the Jews, the “Children of Israel.” The 19th derives its name from “Mary,” mother of Jesus. The 21st is dedicated to the Hebrew “Prophets.” Only one is named for Muhammad and just one bears the name of his first god, “Ar-Rahman.” “Noah” has a surah named in his honor, but so do the “Pen,” “Jinn,” “Signs of the Zodiac,” the “Sun,” and “Moon.”
    Without the Bible, the Qur’an would be a very thin book. Detached from its influence, Islam loses most of its religious trappings. This is the reason Muslims are so insistent that the God of the Bible and the god of the Qur’an are the same. For if they are not, Islam’s reliance on the Bible becomes an insurmountable liability rather than the religion’s lone asset.

 

My response:

You mentioned the following points:

1-  GOD Almighty's Covenant is with the Jews, and Ishmael is cursed/rejected and his descendents are pretty much rejected (unless they convert to your polytheist trinity paganism).

2-  The Noble Quran is very weak and not helpful without the Bible.


Here is my response to your points:

1-  In regards to GOD Almighty's Covenant, this lie that Christians keep advertising is too old and had been exposed and debunked countless times before.  I've written detailed articles regarding this subject which I will list their links below.  But before I do that, I'd like the reader to read the following article which give accurate and direct response to Craig Winn's nonsense:

From www.answering-christianity.com/god_kingdom.htm:

Introduction:  Jesus said to the Jews: "Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.  (From the KJV Bible, Matthew 21:43)"

What other nation beside the modern Muslims of today bow down to GOD Almighty in the most proper way?  What other nation beside the modern Muslims Glorify GOD Almighty in their 5-daily Prayers, and fast the Month of Ramadan for Him?

Let's look at what GOD Almighty said about Ishmael, the father of the Muslims: "And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him. And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation. But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.  (From the KJV Bible, Genesis 17:19-21)"

The Jews were GOD Almighty's chosen people:  "We did aforetime grant to the Children of Israel the Book the Power of Command, and Prophethood; We gave them, for Sustenance, things good and pure; and We favoured them above the nations.  (The Noble Quran, 45:16)

But after they utterly failed with GOD Almighty and His Messengers (Not Moses ever liked their actions, nor Jesus ever liked them and their killings of the Prophets):

"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!  (From the KJV Bible, Matthew 23:37)"

"You have heard these things; look at them all. Will you not admit them? "From now on I will tell you of new things, of hidden things unknown to you. They are created now, and not long ago; you have not heard of them before today. So you cannot say, 'Yes, I knew of them.'   You have neither heard nor understood; from of old your ear has not been open. Well do I know how treacherous you are; you were called a rebel from birth.   For my own name's sake I delay my wrath; for the sake of my praise I hold it back from you, so as not to cut you off.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 48:6-9)"

"So I will disgrace the dignitaries of your temple, and I will consign Jacob to destruction and Israel to scorn.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 43:28)"

"But now, all you who light fires and provide yourselves with flaming torches, go, walk in the light of your fires and of the torches you have set ablaze. This is what you shall receive from my hand: You will lie down in torment.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 50:11)"

They became cursed, and GOD Almighty removed His Kingdom from them and gave it to another nation.  That nation is non other than the "blessed" Muslims who came from the "blessed" Ishmael.

The liars of the NIV Bible had inserted a forgery into their English translation.  In Genesis 16:11-12, they inserted a cheap name-calling "wild ass" for Ishmael, while the original scripts in the King James Version Bible called him "wild man":

"And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction. And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.  (From the KJV Bible, Genesis 16:11-12)"

Ishmael was a wild man, and a "blessed" one by GOD Almighty (Gen. 17:19-21).  He fought the pagan Arabs who practiced brutal slavery and degradation of women.  It was part of the pagan Arabs' custom to bury daughters alive at the age of 4, because a birth of a female brought shame to the family.  Many pagan Arabs used to practice it.

Ironically, the New Jerusalem Bible also agrees with this ridiculous pagan practice: "....and the birth of ANY daughter is a loss.  (From the New Jerusalem Bible, Ecclesiasticus 22:3)"

The "blessed" Ishmael peace be upon him was Allah Almighty's Apostle: "And Isma'il and Elisha, and Jonas, and Lot: and to all We gave favour above the nations:   (The Noble Quran, 6:86)"

"Also mention in the Book (the story of) Isma'il: He was (strictly) true to what he promised, and he was an apostle (and) a prophet.  (The Noble Quran, 19:54)"

Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him has a direct blood relationship with Prophet Ishmael peace be upon him.  Before Prophet Muhammad became a Prophet at the age of 40, he was a well-respected and honored person among his people.  The pagans used him to judge between their affairs.  They also used to trust him with their wealth.  He was called "Al-Sadiq, Al-Ameen", which means "The Honest, the Trust Worthy".

When Prophet Muhammad became the Messenger of Allah Almighty, he brought the Divine Religion of Islam that ended the Judeo-Christian and pagan brutal slavery, lifted the status of women and gave them their rights, and brought Justice, Light and Mercy to the Arabs and to the Muslims world-wide.

 

GOD in the Bible will take His Kingdom from the Jews and give it to another Nation:

The following is an email that sent to me by brother Silent Wisdom; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him.  I did, however, add points to the article/email.

From:    silentwisdom_2002@yahoo.com (Silent Wisdom)
To:    Osama Abdallah
Subj:    Muhammad in the Bible!
Date:    6/28/02 2:08:27 PM Central Daylight Time

As'Salamu Alaikum Warahmatullahi Wa'Barakatu brother,

Here is some Further proofs about Prophecies of the Bible about Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)..

Habakkuk
3:3 God came from Teman, and the Holy One from mount Paran. Selah. His glory covered the heavens, and the earth was full of his praise.
3:4 And his brightness was as the light; he had horns coming out of his hand: and there was the hiding of his power.
3:5 Before him went the pestilence, and burning coals went forth at his feet.

In fact This is a Clear Prophecy about Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), as he was the Only Prophet coming from "Mount of Paran" in Mecca..This is a Clear Verse.

Psalms
118:22 The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner.
118:23 This is the LORD's doing; it is marvelous in our eyes.
118:24 This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.

Matthew
21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
21:44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

What other nation beside the modern Muslims of today bow down to GOD Almighty in the most proper way?  What other nation beside the modern Muslims Glorify GOD Almighty in their 5-daily Prayers, and fast the Month of Ramadan for Him?

Let's look at what GOD Almighty said about Ishmael, the father of the Muslims: "And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him. And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation. But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.  (From the KJV Bible, Genesis 17:19-21)"

The Jews were GOD Almighty's chosen people:  "We did aforetime grant to the Children of Israel the Book the Power of Command, and Prophethood; We gave them, for Sustenance, things good and pure; and We favoured them above the nations.  (The Noble Quran, 45:16)

But after they utterly failed with GOD Almighty and His Messengers (Not Moses ever liked their actions, nor Jesus ever liked them and their killings of the Prophets):

"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!  (From the KJV Bible, Matthew 23:37)"

"You have heard these things; look at them all. Will you not admit them? "From now on I will tell you of new things, of hidden things unknown to you. They are created now, and not long ago; you have not heard of them before today. So you cannot say, 'Yes, I knew of them.'  You have neither heard nor understood; from of old your ear has not been open. Well do I know how treacherous you are; you were called a rebel from birth.  For my own name's sake I delay my wrath; for the sake of my praise I hold it back from you, so as not to cut you off.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 48:6-9)"

"So I will disgrace the dignitaries of your temple, and I will consign Jacob to destruction and Israel to scorn.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 43:28)"

"But now, all you who light fires and provide yourselves with flaming torches, go, walk in the light of your fires and of the torches you have set ablaze. This is what you shall receive from my hand: You will lie down in torment.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 50:11)"

They became cursed, and GOD Almighty removed His Kingdom from them and gave it to another nation.  That nation is non other than the "blessed" Muslims who came from the "blessed" Ishmael.

The liars of the NIV Bible had inserted a forgery into their English translation.  In Genesis 16:11-12, they inserted a cheap name-calling "wild ass" for Ishmael, while the original scripts in the King James Version Bible called him "wild man":

"And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction. And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.  (From the KJV Bible, Genesis 16:11-12)"

Ishmael was a wild man, and a "blessed" one by GOD Almighty (Gen. 17:19-21).  He fought the pagan Arabs who practiced brutal slavery and degradation of women.  It was part of the pagan Arabs' custom to bury daughters alive at the age of 4, because a birth of a female brought shame to the family.  Many pagan Arabs used to practice it.

Ironically, the New Jerusalem Bible also agrees with this ridiculous pagan practice: "....and the birth of ANY daughter is a loss.  (From the New Jerusalem Bible, Ecclesiasticus 22:3)"

The "blessed" Ishmael peace be upon him was Allah Almighty's Apostle: "And Isma'il and Elisha, and Jonas, and Lot: and to all We gave favour above the nations:   (The Noble Quran, 6:86)"

"Also mention in the Book (the story of) Isma'il: He was (strictly) true to what he promised, and he was an apostle (and) a prophet.  (The Noble Quran, 19:54)"

Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him has a direct blood relationship with Prophet Ishmael peace be upon him.  Before Prophet Muhammad became a Prophet at the age of 40, he was a well-respected and honored person among his people.  The pagans used him to judge between their affairs.  They also used to trust him with their wealth.  He was called "Al-Sadiq Al-Ameen", which means "The Honest the Trust Worthy".

When Prophet Muhammad became the Messenger of Allah Almighty, he brought the Divine Religion of Islam that ended the Judeo-Christian and pagan brutal slavery, lifted the status of women and gave them their rights, and brought Justice, Light and Mercy to the Arabs and to the Muslims world-wide.

In Psalms 118:22 and Matthew 21:44, Both are Talking about a Stone, in Fact a Corner Stone that completes the Building of Prophets and God's Kingdom.

In Matthew 21:43, It's a Clear Warning from Jesus (peace be upon him) to Jews that the kingdom of God shall be taken away from them and will be given to another nation can serve it, This nation must be the Great nation of Ishmael mentioned in Bible..and definitely the nation of Islam ,followers of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).

The word Stone (Corner Stone) in both verses was used by prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) himself referring to his similitude with other prophets:

Sahih Al Bukhari:
Volume 4, Book 56, Number 735:

Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "My similitude in comparison with the other prophets before me, is that of a man who has built a house nicely and beautifully, except for a place of one brick in a corner. The people go about it and wonder at its beauty, but say: 'Would that this brick be put in its place!' So I am that brick, and I am the last of the Prophets."

For further understanding to the Corner Stone mentioned in Psalms 118, Here is the earlier Verses of the Chapter:

118:10 All nations compassed me about: but in the name of the LORD will I destroy them.
118:11 They compassed me about; yea, they compassed me about: but in the name of the LORD I will destroy them.
118:12 They compassed me about like bees; they are quenched as the fire of thorns: for in the name of the LORD I will destroy them.
118:13 Thou hast thrust sore at me that I might fall: but the LORD helped me.
118:14 The LORD is my strength and song, and is become my salvation.
118:15 The voice of rejoicing and salvation is in the tabernacles of the righteous: the right hand of the LORD doeth valiantly.
118:16 The right hand of the LORD is exalted: the right hand of the LORD doeth valiantly.
118:17 I shall not die, but live, and declare the works of the LORD.
118:18 The LORD hath chastened me sore: but he hath not given me over unto death.
118:19 Open to me the gates of righteousness: I will go into them, and I will praise the LORD:
118:20 This gate of the LORD, into which the righteous shall enter.
118:21 I will praise thee: for thou hast heard me, and art become my salvation.

Regards,
Salaam (peace)


To the reader, please also visit:

Are Muslims the "Chosen People" of GOD?  If not, then who are?

Isaac and Ishmael in Islam and Christianity.

The "great nation" of Ishmael and its definition in the Bible.

Moses, Jesus and several other Prophets in the Bible never liked the Jews.  How can the Jews be considered GOD's "Chosen People" then?

Jesus told the Jews that GOD Almighty will take His Kingdom from the Jews and give it to the Muslims.

Isaiah 42-54 seem to predict Islam and the removal of GOD Almighty's Covenant from the people of Israel.

Was Hitler's Holocaust against the Jews prophesied in Islam?

The "lost tribes of Israel" are the Muslims of Afghanistan and Kashmir -- Proved from the Bible and History -- Afghan and Kashmiri cities mentioned and documented.

The End of Times Battles in Islam.

The story of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran.

The Signs of Armageddon (The End of Times Battles) in Islam.

The future of Jerusalem in the Noble Quran - Examination of the end of times prophecies in the Bible and the Noble Quran.

What is the Status of Jerusalem in the Noble Quran?

Does the Noble Quran in 17:104 say that the Jews will prevail in the State of Israel until the Day of Judgement? 

Ariel Sharon's "Security Fence" (the great wall that will cover all of Palestine and Israel) CONTRADICTS the Biblical Prophecy in Ezekiel 38:11.

The corruptions and infidel dictatorships in the Muslim world today were prophesized by Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him.

Prophet Muhammad predicted the coming of the "dictators" and bad leaders.

How do you respond to the End of Times Prophecies in the Books of Psalms and Ezekiel against the Muslims of today in the Bible?   See my response to this Christian misunderstanding.

I was told that what's happening in the Middle East today was all foretold in the Bible.  How do you respond to that?

What do you think is the ideal solution for the situation in Israel and Palestine?

Muhammad isn't the "Beast" in Revelation 13! It's the satanic Western (mostly Christians) sexually open societies!

Jesus is the "Beast" in the Noble Quran who will come and fight the devil.

America, the West, and their Pornographic and Capitalist Kingdom in the book of Daniel.

 

2-  In regards to the Noble Quran being weak and helpless without the Bible, it all depends on how you look at it.  The stories and narrations that exist in the Bible about the People of Israel and the events they went through are all irrelevant to the Divine Message of Islam!   Allah Almighty's Main Concern in the Noble Quran is to strengthen the Belief in the Absolute One and Living GOD Almighty and associating no partners (idols, humans or gods) with Him.  That's the bottom line of Islam.

For more details and proofs, visit:  What is the Wisdom of Islam?


As to the accounts that exist in the Bible, even in those, the Bible contains COUNTLESS man's corruption, alteration and lies in it. 
Consider the following few examples that consist of historical contradictions in the Bible:

II Samuel 10:18 talks about David slew the men of 700 chariots of the Syrians and 40,000 horsemen and Shobach the commander.
I Chronicles 1:18 says that David slew the men of 7000 chariots and 40,000 footmen

I Chronicles 9:25 says that Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses and chariots.
I Kings 4:26 says that he had 40,000 stalls for horses

Ezra 2:5 talks about an exile Arah having 775 sons.
Nehemiah 7:10 talks about the same exile Arah having 652 sons.

II Samuel 24:13 So God came to David, and told him, and said unto him, shall SEVEN YEARS OF FAMINE come unto thee in thy land? or will thou flee three months before thine enemies, while they pursue. thee?
I Chronicles 21:11 SO God came to David, and said unto him, Thus saith the LORD, Choose thee. Either THREE YEARS OF FAMINE or three months to be destryed before thy foes, while that the sword of thine enemies overtaketh thee;

How did Judas die?
"And he cast down the pieces of silver into the temple and departed, and went out and hanged himself." (Matthew 27:5)
"And falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all of his bowels gushed out." (Acts 1:18)

2 Samuel 6:23 Therefore MICHAL the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death.
2 Samuel 21:8 But the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of MICHAL the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite.

2 Kings 24:8 Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother's name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem.
2 Chronicles 36:9 Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD.

26th year of the reign of Asa I Kings 16:6-8
36th year of the reign of Asa I 2 Chronicles 16:1

How old was Ahaziah when he began to reign?
22 in 2 Kings 8:26
42 in 2 Chronicle 22:2

Who was Josiah's successor?
Jehoahaz - 2 Chronicle 36:1
Shallum - Jeremiah 22:11

Also, your original scriptures are all doubtful according to the Bible's own theologians and historians.  It's quite hilarious that even the Bible itself admits that it has been tampered with and corrupted by man's garbage:

"`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

The Revised Standard Version makes it even clearer: "How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie(From the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

And regarding who wrote the books and gospels of the Bible, well here is a sample of what the NIV Bible's theologians and historians wrote:

"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark.  They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark.  His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost.  (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes, page 1528)"

"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1643)"

"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1856)"

"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1905)"

"It seems safe to conclude that the book, at least in its early form, dates from the beginning of the monarchy. Some think that Samuel may have had a hand in shaping or compiling the materials of the book, but in fact we are unsure who the final author or editor was.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 286)"

"Although, according to tradition, Samuel wrote the book, authorship is actually uncertain.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 322)"

"The date of the composition is also unknown, but it was undoubtedly during the monarchy.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 322)"

"The author is unknown. Jewish tradition points to Samuel, but it is unlikely that he is the author because the mention of David (4:17,22) implies a later date.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 360)"

"Who the author was cannot be known with certainty since the book itself gives no indication of his identity.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 368)"

"There is little conclusive evidence as to the identity of the author of 1,2 Kings.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 459)"

"Whoever the author was, it is clear that he was familiar with the book of Deuteronomy.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 459)"

"According to ancient Jewish tradition, Ezra wrote Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah (see Introduction to Ezra: Literary Form and Authorship), but this cannot be established with certainty.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 569)"

"Although we do not know who wrote the book of Esther, from internal evidence it is possible to make some inferences about the author and the date of composition.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 707)"

"The unknown author probably had access to oral and/or written sources....(From the NIV Bible commentary, page 722)"

"Regarding authorship, opinions are even more divided....(From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 773)"

etc...

How do you respond to this?


Please visit: Just who were the original authors of the Bible? to see the book's bibliography to the above quotes.

Also, why don't you visit: Contradictions and proofs of Historical Corruptions in the Bible, and see exactly what I mean, instead of acting like a total fool and saying things that even the Bible refutes in it!

It is quite obvious that Christians today believe in third party authors' words as the words of GOD.  This is a very serious corruption in the Bible that must be taken into deep consideration by the Bible's followers.  Please visit "Is the Bible the true word of GOD?" to see a full and complete paper about the logical corruptions in the Bible, along with many Christian famous priests and ministers opinions that agree with the Bible's corruption.  I have their personal quotes in that site.


Also, as to the parts of the Bible that Muslims believe are closest to the Truth, please visit: www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm

After that, please visit:  Prophet Muhammad was foretold in many places in the Bible in both the Old and New Testaments.

 

 

He wrote:

    As we turn the page we are confronted with some rather astonishing Nimrod fairytales. It’s odd that a historian like Tabari would jettison his chronology to insert these randomly throughout his depictions of Noah and Abraham. I’m surprised that he even presents them at all, but nonetheless, they are there, and thus we must deal with them. Tabari II:106 “Nimrod’s arrogance and rebelliousness against his Lord went on for a long time—some say four hundred years—in spite of Allah’s forbearance with him.”
    The pot calls the kettle black. “Nimrod was ignorant. He was the first tyrant on earth.” As a result: “Allah sent gnats against them [the Babylonians, I suppose], and they ate their flesh and drank their blood, and nothing but their bones were left. But Allah gave Nimrod a single gnat which entered his nostril and went on beating the inside of his head with hammers for four hundred years. The most merciful of his friends was he who bunched up his hands and beat Nimrod’s head with them.”
    That really made him mad. Tabari II:107 “Nimrod vowed to seek out Abraham’s God. So he took four eagle fledglings and nurtured them on meat and wine so that they grew up tough and strong. Then he tied them to a chest and sat in it. He suspended a piece of meat over them and they flew up trying to reach it. When they had risen high in the sky, Nimrod looked down and beheld the earth. He saw the mountains crawling below like creeping ants. When they had risen still higher he looked and saw the earth with a sea surrounding it. After climbing still higher, he came into a region of darkness and could not see what was above him nor what was below him. He became frightened and threw the meat down. The eagles followed it, darting downward. When the mountains saw them coming near and heard their noise, they became afraid and almost moved from their places, but did not do so. As Allah says, ‘Verily they have plotted their plot, and their plot is with Allah, even if their plot were one whereby the  mountains should be moved.’” [Qur’an 14:46]
    I recognize that Islamic Hadith are designed to explain the Qur’an, but this one is counterproductive. And sadly, there is no excuse. These fables were concocted a thousand years after the frivolity of pagan myths had been exposed to reason. This is long after Moses, David, Solomon, Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle enlightened the civilized world.
    With that in mind, let’s examine the Qur’anic problem Muhammad was trying to solve. In the 41st verse of the 14th surah, we read, “Think not that Allah is oblivious…. Hastening forward, their heads upraised, their eyes staring aghast and their hearts vacant. Warn people of the day when the punishment shall be inflicted upon them. Then will the wicked say: ‘Lord, give us a respite, (so) we shall respond to Your call and follow the apostles.’ ‘What! did you not swear before (that) there will be no reverse for us!’” Evidently the inebriated eagles didn’t have reverse either. 014.046 “And they are plotting their plots, but their plan is evident to Allah, even though their plot is so adroit as to make the mountains move.” So, there you have it. Muhammad needed to come up with a plot that was capable of making the mountains move for the Qur’an to make sense. The drunken eagle bit was perfect.
    The surah that claims Allah isn’t “oblivious” ends with these words: 014.047 “Therefore do not think Allah will fail in His promise to His prophet; surely Allah is Mighty, the Lord of Retribution.” That’s pretty clear, and so is this: “On the day the earth shall be changed into a different earth…you will see the guilty bound together in chains. Their shirts will be made of molten pitch and the fire will cover their faces so that Allah may reward each soul.” Why do a billion people worship such a sadistic “god?”
    The Nimrodian Tradition continues to scuttle any last remnant of credibility Islam may have otherwise retained: Tabari II:108 “They took off from Jerusalem and they fell down in the Mountain of Smoke. When Nimrod saw that this method would accomplish nothing, he began building the tower—taller and taller. Then he voided excrement though it. Allah seized his building by its foundations and the roof fell down upon them and doom came upon them whence they knew not.” [Qur’an 16:26] Dare we poke through the excrement and find Allah’s little problem? Or do we just chalk this one up to diarrhea of the mouth?
    We’ve come this far. Why give up now? Hold your nose if you must. Verses 22-25 of the 16th surah say that non-Muslims are puffed up with pride (probably from holding their noses) and living in denial. But Allah is on to them like stink on…well, you know what. The Big Guy asks, “‘What has your Lord sent down?’ They answer, ‘Tales from long ago.’” In other words, a blend of plagiarism and stolen Hebrew and Babylonian myths. As you will discover in the “Source Material” appendix, the Islamic clerics in Baghdad who fleshed out the Qur’an in the eighth century attempted to make it seem more religious by usurping myths and fables from the Talmud, uninspired Jewish folklore.
    That somehow leads us to this: 016.026 “Those that have gone before them had also conspired; [Have you noticed how many plots there are in the Qur’an? Everybody has a conspiracy going, even Allah.] Then Allah uprooted their structure from its foundation; the roof fell over them from above, and punishment came upon them from where they did not suspect.” Okay, I understand. Without the context of the Hadith the Qur’an doesn’t make sense. But with the context, nothing makes sense.
    Tabari II:109 “Then it fell, and on that day the languages of mankind became confused from fright, and mankind came to speak seventy-three languages. Before that the only language had been Syriac. It was called Babel.” In the midst of the stench, there are some pearls. The first written languages, Sumerian and then Akkadian, were created around 3000 B.C. They were used by the Sumerians, Babylonians, and Assyrians. Aramaic, which may have been derived from Phoenician, was used as the basis for Syriac some 3,000 years later.  But the confession is enlightening. The Syrian Christians were the first to write Arabic. They developed its alphabet in the sixth century. Written Arabic, from which the word “qur’an” was derived, didn’t make its way into Central Arabia, and therefore to Mecca, until after Muhammad alleges the Qur’an was “revealed” to him in Arabic. So this ridiculous notion that Syriac was the first language is designed to solve a problem our Muslim pals have with their timeline. The alphabet of the Qur’an was actually unknown when “the book” was revealed.
    As we move through this collection of “inspired” Hadith, we are given another glimpse behind the veil of Islam. “‘We are only growing farther from heaven,’ Nimrod said. ‘Descend!’” Now you know which direction to look to find Allah. Tabari II:109 “The unbelievers were Nimrod and Nebuchadnezzar, while the believers were Solomon bin David and Alexander.” And I’ll bet you didn’t know that the resolutely pagan Alexander the Great was a monotheistic Muslim or that the devoutly Jewish King Solomon was Islamic.
    “In the same way, Nebuchadnezzar was warlord of the lands extending from Ahwaz to the land of the Byzantines lying west of the Tigris, before Luhrasb. He was bruised by fighting the Turks.” Eighth grade history and a good timeline would do these boys a world of good.
    But unfortunately, they were up to no good. Not even twenty percent of this has been believable. We have been regaled with a steady stream of impossibilities, contradictions, and fairytales. This has got to be the most-feeble attempt at religion ever postulated by man.
    A crime has been committed. The evidence commands a verdict of guilty. There is a zero probability that these words were inspired by God. That means Muhammad lied: he was not a prophet, and Allah was not God. But that’s good news, not bad. It frees us to explore the more important questions. We can now focus on how the scam was compiled, and more importantly, why. Once we understand how and why we will know what can be done to stop Islam before it kills more of them—and us.

 

 

My response:

It doesn't matter if the narrations above from Al-Tabari are not approved by you, or contradict the Bible.  Like I said and irrefutably proved above, both the Bible and Hadiths (Sayings of Prophet Muhammad) today do contain COUNTLESS errors, lies and corruptions in them!  I have no saying about the validity and truthfulness of the quotes above from Al-Tabari.  They don't seem harmful to me, but I still can't say they are Truthful when they were documented literally 100s of years after our Prophet's death.  The "Sahih Bukhari" or "Authentic Bukhari" in English was the first Hadiths volume to be compiled.  Bukhari is not an Arabic name!   Bukhari is derived from the word "Bukhara", which is a city in Afghanistan:

"We now come to the Iron Gate which corresponds exactly to the Quranic description, and has the best claim to be connected with Alexander's story.  It is near another Derbend in Central Asia, Hissar District, about 150 miles southeast of Bukhara......."  (www.answering-christianity.com/iron_gates.htm)  

For anyone who knows the Islamic history, this means that the Muslims spread Islam to the pagan Arabs, established the Islamic State in Arabia, then fought the Persians (Iranians) and the Romans; invaded the Persians and crushed the Romans, then fought the Hindus in Hindustan, invaded much of their lands such as "Pakistan", "Afghanistan", and much of the Indian territories, convert people there to Islam, and then Brother Bukhari appeared from his home town, Bukhara and decided to compile the Hadiths of "Sahih Bukhari".

Are these narrations all 100% perfect and reliable?  Any person with the least atom of a brain would say no.  I am not saying that all of the Hadiths must be rejected.  But for us to day to have close to 2,000,000 of them is quite ridiculous, because they can't all have been written down during our Prophet's times in Arabia.  Most of the Hadiths' chains of narrations today have 10s of narrators in them.  In the Hadith books, you would see something like the following:

"About such and such, that he heard his father say that such and such said, that he heard such and such say, that he heard such and such say, etc...."  Most of the narrations' links have tons of narrators in them, many times more than 10, and these people would be generations after each others!  In other words, they're not people at the same age or the same group.  And the worst dilemma of all, is that many of these chain of narrations have broken links in them, meaning, that two or three generations are missing in the chain!

Most of the hadiths are corrupt and are not recognized as authentic.  Most certainly the books of Al-Tabari and Ishaq are among the weakest and most doubtful sources, because they are more like history books that were written 300 years after the Prophet's death.  Their narrations were orally transmitted by others.   Many people took hadiths out of context, and many others added or took from them, and many others even fabricated lies, as Allah Almighty Warned us in the Noble Quran:

"A section of the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) say:  Believe in the morning what is revealed to the believers (Muslims), but reject it at the end of the day; perchance they may (themselves) turn back (from Islam).  (The Noble Quran, 3:72)"

Also, it is almost impossible to narrate a narration/saying accurately after 300 years in Arabic, because the language is very complex, poetical and artistic:

From www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm:

Problems with the proper Arabic language and the large quantity of narrations:

In Arabic, only original Arabs and those who speak proper (not slang) Arabic fluently, understand and appreciate the fact that the words are very minimum and their meanings are very maximum.  It is true and not a deception or innovation by translators to English that a single Arabic word can and would be translated to 3-5 English words!  The reason for this is because in Arabic (and this is part of the complexity in grammar, art and poetry of the Arabic language) meanings and not necessarily actual words can be all put together in one word.  In Arabic, a word is not original.  There are of course "root" words, but in most proper Arabic words, the actual word is not original; meaning that depending on the grammar, letters (of meaning) can be added to or taken from it to add or take from its meaning and intention.  This can change the entire meaning of the whole word  and sentence.

That is why Arabic poetry is historically known to be a very complex and advanced one.

Having said all of this, in the case of the hadiths, given the fact that there exists "weak/doubtful ones", and what is considered as "strong and reliable ones", it is difficult to know for sure if a single hadith was told as is 100% unchanged (intentionally or not intentionally) by the Prophet peace be upon him. One word taken off from the hadith and the whole meaning can and would be changed to something else.

For those "reliable or strong" hadiths, their sources are doubtful.  I have no doubt that the companions of the Prophet may Allah Almighty bless their souls did not intentionally commit forgery or lies.  But for one such as Abu Huraira to narrate thousands upon thousands of hadiths is preposterous!  Given the complexity and sensitivity of the Arabic language, it is extremely vital that every word be included in the narration.  I find it impossible to believe that Abu Huraira and many others like him were able to narrate everything perfectly in its original text.

That is why I accept the hadiths that are linked to the Noble Quran as the Truth and reject the others.

Also, there is no proof what so ever that all of the accepted hadiths of today were all written during the Prophet's time.  Some or even many of them were probably written down from individuals for personal use, but the thousands of hadiths (I was told close to 2 million hadiths!!) that exist today were not possibly all written during the Prophet's time. 

I only accept the hadiths that have a direct relationship to the Noble Quran, such as explaining how to Pray, fast, etc....

Example about my own name to simplify things:

Take "Osama" for example.  First of all, Osama in Arabic is written as "Osamat" with the "t" silent.  The "t" however is not always silent, and it can be used to give meanings and intentions to the name "Osama".  Osama can be written as "Osamatun", "Osamatan", "Osamatin", "Osamata", "Osamati", "Osamato".  The punctuations added to the "t" cause for any of these names to be pronounced.

When writing positively about "Osama", such as "Osama bin Zaid", the leader who defeated the Romans in one of the battles, these punctuations are added to his name for praising.  Unfortunately, I am not an expert in Arabic, nor can I explain in deep details about proper Arabic, but I know that use of punctuations IMPROPERLY can result in insulting the individual.  I can write negatively about a name using punctuations in their proper places.

THE REASON WHY THE NOBLE QURAN IS SO PERFECT IS BECAUSE its grammar was constructed in a very complex way, and the Arabic words were not only original words, but were put together uniquely in an excellent artistic fashion that no Arabic poet could match up to back then when Allah Almighty challenged the Arabs to come up with a "SURAH LIKE IT".


To the reader, please visit: 
What parts of the Bible and Hadiths do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth, and Why?


The above Al-Tabari narrations' disagreement with the pornful bible; the book of women's vaginas and breasts taste like "wine", does not make them any less than the bible itself, because the bible contains OVERWHELMING contradictions in its own historical accounts.   To the reader, please visit:  Errors, Contradictions and Historical Corruption in the Bible.

So much for your pornful bible being the measuring stick for the Truth, when it is notorious in lies and corruptions!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to My Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.

Rebuttals to Craig Winn - "The Prophet of Doom" book.

Answering Trinity.

Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible.

Questions about Jesus that trinitarian Christians don't have logical answers for.

What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth? and Why?

"Allah" was GOD Almighty's original Name in the Bible according to the Hebrew and Aramaic sources.

Scientific Miracles in Islam and the Noble Quran.

Most of the Bible's books and gospels were written by mysterious people!

Jesus mentioned Muhammad by the name in the Bible.

Did Isaiah 53 really prophesies about the crucifixion of Jesus? It supports Islam's claims about Jesus peace be upon him never died on the cross.  I also addressed John 19:36-37 from the Bible and proved that Jesus never got crucified, since GOD Almighty promised that he will protect Jesus' body and not let even a single bone be broken.  My question to all Christians is: How in the world is it possible for the feet to get nailed on the cross without any penetration to the bones by the nails, hence breaking part of the feet's bones?! I also added refutations to Exodus 12:46, Numbers 9:12, Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 34:20, which supposedly prove the Christians' belief about Jesus crucifixion.  I proved that this dogma has no truth what so ever and exposed the wrong Trinitarian English translation of Zechariah 12:10.


Send your comments.

Back to Main Page.