Further Topic Research:
Run "Go" twice to bypass Bing

Mary:  Fornicate with you "in my mother's bed" [1].  Are virgin Mary's mother and bed also members of the barfinity ?


200 years no gospels | 24 other thrones besides Jesus' | Jesus was created | Isaiah 53 mistranslations | What's new | A-Z library (3300+ articles) | "Muslims" was the original title | Quran Search | Quran Moral Code (100s of them) | Quran: Bibles are filled with corrupt  قول  qaowl (doctrines of sayings and writings)  | "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah | Jesus said he was powerless | Research & Blog | 9/11 Israel-lie | Youtube | |
  
  
    

Perverted Missionary Mentality and Nursing of Adults.  Paul also sucked the blood out of Timothy's penis:

  

  

In Name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful,
" Nay, We hurl the Truth against falsehood, and it knocks out its brain, and behold, falsehood doth perish! Ah! woe be to you for the (false) things ye ascribe (to Us)"
(Holy Qur'an 21: 18)

Perverted Missionary Mentality
and
Nursing of Adults

by
Hesham Azmy
Usman Sheikh
Published in Oct., 29th, 2003



  In accordance with classical missionary habits, the Christian missionary Sam Shamoun - who is notorious for his perverted and filthy misinterpretations - has taken the event of Sahla bint Suhail nursing an adult boy, Salem the ally of Abu Huzaifah, as an opportunity to assault Islam calling it “shameful and disgusting to say the least”. His article can be viewed here, Islam and Nursing of Adults.

  In this paper, insha’Allah, we are going to refute this pervert missionary whose mind is filled with none but filth, wa Allah-ul-Must’an.

What is the significance of nursing?
Who is the pervert?
Why was nursing of adults permitted?
Is nursing of adults permitted now?
Did Paul have gay urges?
Conclusion.
Addendum: Our Challenge to Sam Shamoun.


What is the significance of nursing?

  According to numerous Prophetic traditions, foster relations are treated like blood relations in marital affairs. These relations can render one Muhram (i.e., unmarriageable), so he can visit his foster relatives and see them as he does his blood relatives.

Narrated Aisha:
Aflah asked the permission to visit me but I did not allow him. He said, "Do you veil yourself before me although I am your uncle?" `Aisha said, "How is that?" Aflah replied, "You were suckled by my brother's wife with my brother's milk." I asked Allah's Apostle about it, and he said, "Aflah is right, so permit him to visit you."
(Sahih-ul-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 48, Number 812)

Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
The Prophet said about Hamza's daughter, "I am not legally permitted to marry her, as foster relations are treated like blood relations (in marital affairs). She is the daughter of my foster brother."
(Sahih-ul-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 48, Number 813)

Narrated `Amra bint `Abdur-Rahman:
That `Aisha the wife of the Prophet told her uncle that once, while the Prophet was in her house, she heard a man asking Hafsa's permission to enter her house. `Aisha said, "I said, 'O Allah's Apostle! I think the man is Hafsa's foster uncle.' " `Aisha added, "O Allah's Apostle! There is a man asking the permission to enter your house." Allah's Apostle replied, "I think the man is Hafsa's foster uncle." `Aisha said, "If so-and-so were living (i.e. her foster uncle) would he be allowed to visit me?" Allah's Apostle said, "Yes, he would, as the foster relations are treated like blood relations (in marital affairs).
(Sahih-ul-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 48, Number 814)

Narrated Aisha:
Once the Prophet came to me while a man was in my house. He said, "O `Aisha! Who is this (man)?" I replied, "My foster brothers" He said, "O `Aisha! Be sure about your foster brothers, as fosterage is only valid if it takes place in the suckling period (before two years of age).
(Sahih-ul-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 48, Number 815)

  So, the purpose of the Prophet’s permission to Sahla bint Suhail was to make Salem her foster son in order that he could approach her as a son approaches his mother.

 


Who is the pervert?

  Shamoun’s filthy interpretation of the Prophetic permission reminds us of a famous Egyptian joke about an idiot who once wanted to drink hot milk, so he burnt his cow. Shamoun typically thinks like this idiot. If you want to drink some milk, will you go under the cow and suckle it? Will you put the cow on fire to heat its milk and then go under it and suckle? Well, if you are Sam Shamoun the answer will be probably YES! Only a filthy idiot diseased with congenital hypothyroidism would think like that. However, this is the only way of thinking familiar to Shamoun’s perverted mind.

  Well, direct contact is not necessary for nursing. In other words, the milk is collected in a cup or pot and the foster son drinks from it, without getting in contact with the foster mother. This is what happened in the case of Sahla bint Suhail and Salem as reported by Muhammad Ibn Sa’d and Ibn Hajar Al-‘Asqalani in their respective biographies of Sahla bint Suhail  …

 
Muhammad Ibn ‘Umar told us: Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdullah, Az-Zuhri’s nephew, told us on authority of his father that he said: an amount of one milk drink was collected in a pot or glass, so Salem used to drink it every day, for five days. After this, he used to enter at her while her head is uncovered. This was permission from Messenger of Allah to Sahla bint Suhail.
(Ibn Sa’d, Kitab At-Tabaqat Al-Kabir, Volume 10, page 257. Also, Ibn Hajar, Al-Isabah, Volume 7, page 717)

  We believe that his is a fatal refutation to Shamoun’s perverted mentality. The charge he wanted to direct towards our Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) has fired back upon him. It is crystal-clear that this missionary did not derive his filthy interpretation from any Islamic source, rather, it came from his equally filthy mind.

  In order for his argument to carry at least a little weight, the missionary needs to demonstrate to the readers that others besides him also misunderstood the tradition in exactly the same way as he did (note that quoting his fellow missionaries proves nothing other than they are as perverted as he is). However, we are 100% certain that he is about the only person on this planet who ever misunderstood the meaning of such a simple, straightforward tradition. Therefore his lack of comprehension and the pervert nature of his feeble mind does not prove anything against Islam. That is to say that if Sam Shamoun cannot understand and comprehend a simple issue, then that proves nothing against Islam other than to demonstrate his own lack of intelligence, moreover when he is the only person who seems to have had a "problem" with the passage and got "confused" with its intended meaning.

 


Why was nursing of adults permitted?

  According to the following reports in Sahih Muslim, nursing of the young boy, Salem, was permission from the Messenger of Allah to Sahla bint Suhail.

' A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Messenger of Allah, I see on the face of Abu Hudhaifa (signs of disgust) on entering of Salim (who is an ally) into (our house), whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Suckle him. She said: How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man? Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) smiled and said: I already know that he is a young man. 'Amr has made this addition in his narration that he participated in the Battle of Badr and in the narration of Ibn 'Umar (the words are): Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) laughed.
(Sahih Muslim, Volume 5, Book 8, Number 3424)

  On quoting this particular hadith, Shamoun has made emphasis on Sahla's wonderment "How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man?" implying that she found it disgusting to nurse an adult boy according to the missionary's filthy interpretation, and on the Prophet's (peace be upon him) laugh implying that it was a 'mischievous' one. In response to this ugly gesture, we note that Sahla knew, as any Muslim, that nursing is effective only in the first two years, this is the reason why she expressed her wonder. When the Prophet (peace be upon him) confirmed his command, she realized the exceptional nature of this permission. It is well known that a newborn baby suckles directly from the breast because he/she is unable to drink from a cup in contrast to older children and adults. That is why it is only natural and logical to think of a cup or a similar object when one mentions a grown-up person, not direct suckling from the breast, especially when the Arabic word Reda' - which is rendered to nursing or suckling - does not indicate any direct contact. There is no room for misunderstanding or misinterpretation here. We too would like to express our wonder regarding the dirty missionary interpretation and ask Shamoun to explain how the dismay and uneasiness of Abu Huzaifah, Sahla's husband, on the mere idea of Salem getting a little close to his wife like a son, 'disappeared' as the below hadith shows, if direct suckling from his wife's breast had occurred? How could this act have made Abu Huzaifah any 'happy' or receptive towards Salem?

  We repeat again that Abu Huzaifah's dismay was at the mere notion of Salem approaching his wife - as a son appoaches his mother. Can we then imagine that such a jealous man would accept or allow a practice that, according to the pervert missionary, would require his wife to literally breast feed another man, and that his dismay and uneasiness would just 'vanish'?! You must bring the most irrational explanation to answer this question with a "yes". We do congratulate Sam Shamoun for his extraordinary mental 'integrity'!

'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. She (i. e. the daughter of Suhail came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Salim has attained (purbety) as men attain, and he understands what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that something (rankles) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa, whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said to her: Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the rankling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and said: So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappeared.
(Sahih Muslim, Volume 5, Book 8, Number 3425)

Umm Salama said to 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her): A young boy who is at the threshold of puberty comes to you. I, however, do not like that he should come to me, whereupon 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) said: Don't you see in Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) a model for you? She also said: The wife of Abu Hudhaifa said: Messenger of Allah, Salim comes to me and now he is a (grown-up) person, and there is something that (rankles) in the mind of Abu Hudhaifa about him, whereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Suckle him (so that he may become your foster-child), and thus he may be able to come to you (freely).
(Sahih Muslim, Volume 5, Book 8, Number 3427)

Zainab daughter of Abu Salama reported: I heard Umm Salama, the wife of Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon himy, saying to 'A'isha: By Allah, I do not like to be seen by a young boy who has passed the period of fosterage, whereupon she ('A'isha) said: Why is it so? Sahla daughter of Suhail came to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah's Messenger, I swear by Allah that I see in the face of Abu Hudhaifa (the signs of disgust) on account of entering of Salim (in the house), whereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Suckle him. She (Sahla bint Suhail) said: He has a beard. But he (again) said: Suckle him, and it would remove what is there (expression of disgust) on the face of Abu Hudhaifa. She said: (I did that) and, by Allah, I did not see (any sign of disgust) on the face of Abu Hadhaifa.
(Sahih Muslim, Volume 5, Book 8, Number 3428)

  The reader of this report can easily recognize that Salem used to enter Sahla's home when he was her adopted son. But when Islam forbade the adoption, a transitional phase was necessary because Salem was like a real son to Sahla and it was difficult for her to push him away as a stranger. This is the reason for this kind permission of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him). One is indeed shocked to see how this kind and humane gesture of the Holy Messenger (peace be upon him) is given the most disgusting interpretation by a pervert missionary!

  Was this permission for Sahla alone? We tend to say: “Yes!” because the general Islamic view is that there is no effective nursing after the first two years of age. Our proof is the report on authority of ‘Aisha herself that Allah’s Apostle (peace be upon him) said, “fosterage is only valid if it takes place in the suckling period (before two years of age).” (Sahih-ul-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 48, Number 815)

  Imam Ibn Kathir in his commentary on Qur’an 2:233 notes,

  It is reported in both Sahihs that `Aisha thought that if a woman gives her milk to an older person (meaning beyond the age of two years) then this will establish fosterage. This is also the opinion of `Ata' Ibn Abu Rabah and Al-Laith Ibn Sa`d. Hence, `Aisha thought that it is permissible to suckle the man whom the woman needs to be allowed in her house. She used as evidence the Hadith of Salem, the freed slave of Abu Huzaifah, where the Prophet ordered Abu Huzaifah's wife to give some of her milk to Salem, although he was a man, and ever since then, he used to enter her house freely. However, the rest of the Prophet's wives did not agree with this opinion and thought that this was only a special case. This is also the opinion of the Majority of the scholars (Al-Jumhour). The evidence of the Majority of scholars who are the Four Imams, the Seven Jurists, eminent Companions and the rest of the Prophet’s wives except ‘Aisha, is what is reported in both Sahihs on authority of ‘Aisha that Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said, “Be sure about your foster brothers, as fosterage is only valid if it takes place in the suckling period (before two years of age).”
(Ibn Kathir, Tafsir-ul-Qur’an Al-‘Azim, Volume 1, page 358. Published by Maktabat-ul-Iman, Mansoura, Egypt)

  For more details regarding juristic aspects of Sahla’s hadith, there is a very valuable Arabic book by Dr. Muhammad Al-Hifnawi, “Ar-Redaa’ wa Bunouk-ul-Laban” (i.e., Nursing and Milk Banks) for those who are interested.

 


Is nursing of adults permitted now?

  The obvious answer to this question is “No!”, for nursing which leads to fosterage is effective only in the first two years of age as the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) said, “fosterage is only valid if it takes place in the suckling period (before two years of age)”. (Sahih-ul-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 48, Number 815). This is conclusion of the following authorities …

‘Umar Ibn Al-Khattab,
‘Ali Ibn Abi Taleb,
Ibn ‘Abbas,
Ibn Mas’ood,
Gaber,
Abu Huraira,
Ibn ‘Umar,
Umm Salma,
Sa’id Ibn-ul-Musayyib,
‘Ataa,
Az-Zuhri,
Qatada,
Ash-Shu’abi,
Sufyan Ath-Thawri,
Al-Awza’i,
Malik,
Ash-Shaf’i,
Ahmad Ibn Hanbal,
Ishaq,
Abu Thawr and others (See also Isaiah 1:9-17: Yahweh called Israel Sodom, because it spreads evil and is unjust).

  Imam Abu Hanifah is reported to have allowed additional six months after the two years, but his chief disciples Abu Yusuf and Muhammad Ash-Shaybani disagreed with this view and joined the above authorities. All scholars of Abu Hanifah’s Mazhab (i.e., School of Thought) follow the view of Abu Yusuf and Muhammad Ash-Shaybani.Yes, 'Aisha held the view that nursing of adults is permissible, but her view cannot stand before the agreement of other wives of the Prophet, emienent Companions, Seven Jurists of Madinah (from the generation of Tabi'un) and Four Imams. And Allah knows best.

  Imam Al-Qurtubi in his commentary on Qur’an 2:233 notes,

  Imam Malik (may Allah be Merciful to him), his followers and a group of scholars has gathered from this verse that nursing which is treated like blood relation is what takes place in the (first) two years; because after two years, nursing is over and there is no considerable nursing after two years. This is his statement in his Muwatta in the report of Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Hakam on his authority. This is the opinion of ‘Umar and Ibn ‘Abbas and it was reported on authority of Ibn Mas’ood. It was also stated by Az-Zuhri, Qatada, Ash-Shu’abi, Sufyan Ath-Thawri, Al-Awza’i, Ash-Shaf’i, Ahmad, Ishaq, Abu Yusuf, Muhammad and Abu Thawr. Ibn Abdul-Hakam reported on his authority: “two years with additional few days”. Abdul-Malik, “like a month”. Ibn-ul-Qasim related on authority of Malik that he said, “Nursing is (considerable within) two years and two months later”. Al-Walid Ibn Muslim related on his authority that he said, “Nursing one, two or three months after the two years is still considered within the two years, whatever comes after this is nonsense”. It is reported on authority of (Abu Hanifah) An-Nu’man that he said, “What is after the two years up to six months is (considered) nursing”. But the authentic (opinion) is the first one due to His saying “The mothers shall give suck to their offspring for two whole years”. This indicates that there is no significance of whatever the newborn suckles after the age of two years. Sufyan related on authority of ‘Amr Ibn Dinar on authority of Ibn ‘Abbas that he said, Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said, “There is no nursing but within the (first) two years”. Ad-Darqatni said, it is related on authority of Ibn ‘Uyaiinah but by Al-Haytham Ibn Gamil and he is a trustworthy memorizer.

  I say: This report in addition to the verse and its meaning disallows nursing of the adult and (indicates) that it has no significance. It was reported on authority of ‘Aisha that she endorsed it and it was the opinion of Al-Laith Ibn Sa’d among scholars. It was reported about Abu Musa Al-Ash’ari that he used to validate it and reported that he retracted this opinion.
(Al-Qurtubi, Al-Game’ le Ahkam-el-Qur’an, Volume 2, page 139-140. Published by Dar-ul-Hadith, Cairo, Egypt. ISBN 977-5227-44-5)

  Imam Ibn Kathir in his commentary on Qur’an 2:233 notes,

  The opinion that nursing does not establish fosterage after the age of two years is reported on authority of ‘Ali, Ibn ‘Abbas, Ibn Mas’ood, Gaber, Abu Huraira, Ibn ‘Umar, Umm Salma, Sa’id Ibn-ul-Musayyib, ‘Attaa and the Majority of Scholars (Al-Jumhour). This is the Mazhab (School of Though) of Ash-Shaf’i, Ahmad, Ishaq, Ath-Thawri, Abu Yusuf, Muhammad and Malik in one report on his authority. It is reported on his authority that it is two years and two months, and in another report, two years and three months. Abu Hanifah said: “Two years and six months”. Zafar Ibn-ul-Huzayl said, “As long as he suckles, it is up to three years” this is reported on authority of Al-Awza’i. Malik said, “If the baby weans before the age of two years, then a woman suckles him after weaning, it does not establish fosterage because it becomes like food”, this is reported on authority of Al-Awza’i. It is reported on authority of ‘Umar and ‘Ali that they said, “No nursing after weaning”. It is probable they meant either the two years as the Majority state whether he weans or not, or the act itself as Malik said, and Allah knows best.

  It is reported in both Sahihs that `Aisha thought that if a woman gives her milk to an older person (meaning beyond the age of two years) then this will establish fosterage. This is also the opinion of `Ata' Ibn Abu Rabah and Al-Laith Ibn Sa`d. Hence, `Aisha thought that it is permissible to suckle the man whom the woman needs to be allowed in her house. She used as evidence the Hadith of Salem, the freed slave of Abu Huzaifah, where the Prophet ordered Abu Huzaifah's wife to give some of her milk to Salem, although he was a man, and ever since then, he used to enter her house freely. However, the rest of the Prophet's wives did not agree with this opinion and thought that this was only a special case. This is also the opinion of the Majority of the scholars (Al-Jumhour). The evidence of the Majority of scholars who are the Four Imams, the Seven Jurists, eminent Companions and the rest of the Prophet’s wives except ‘Aisha, is what is reported in both Sahihs on authority of ‘Aisha that Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said, “Be sure about your foster brothers, as fosterage is only valid if it takes place in the suckling period (before two years of age).”
(Ibn Kathir, Tafsir-ul-Qur’an Al-‘Azim, Volume 1, page 358. Published by Maktabat-ul-Iman, Mansoura, Egypt)


Did Paul have gay urges?



  Sam Shamoun concluded his ugly paper with the following  ...

Whatever interpretation Aisha, Umar and Ibn Masud may have given to Muhammad's instruction later on (correctly or incorrectly), the fact that Muhammad would command a woman to nurse a young man is shameful and disgusting to say the least.

  Since we have refuted in detail the distortion concocted by Sam Shamoun, let us now turn the tables upon him and apply his own pervert thoughts upon the Christian religious personalities in order to see its outcome. In the Book of Acts we are informed that Paul had Timothy circumcised:

1: And he came also to Derbe and to Lystra: and behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timothy, the son of a Jewess that believed; but his father was a Greek.
2: The same was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium.
3: Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and he took and circumcised him because of the Jews that were in those parts: for they all knew that his father was a Greek.
(Acts 16:3 American Standard Version)

  Paul circumcised Timothy because he was facing stiff opposition from the Jews. Thus, in order to avoid getting into more troubles Paul had Timothy circumcised, even though Timothy's father happened to be a Greek Gentile. But why was the circumcision debate important for the Jews whom Paul wanted to pacify?

  To some Gentile readers, this circumcision debate might seem peripheral. Some men are circumcised, others not - so what? In order to see the revolution that Paul was effecting within Jewish circles (or satellites) we turn to the old rabbinic texts. The rabbis considered circumcision so important that they declared 6 that were it not for the blood of the covenant - that is to say, the blood which flowed from Abraham's penis when, at God's insistence, he circumcised himself - heaven and earth would not exist. The teaching of Judaism was that a child must still shed the blood of a covenant...even if he is born without a foreskin, and even if for some medical or other reason he is circumcised before the mystical eighth day. Even the angels are circumcised....

  Converts to Judaism in the Roman period had to undergo circumcision....Strangely enough, in Palestine rules were more liberal than in the Diaspora, and there were Proselytes of the Gate, as they were known, who were allowed to 'become Jews' without circumcision. But such was not the general rule. It was widely believed that the admission of uncircumcised men into Jewish religious worship 'impeded the arrival of the Messiah'. While 'semi-converts' were allowed, those who observed the Sabbath and the dietary laws, they were to be regarded as heathens if after a twelve-month period they had not undergone circumcision. These stringent rules did not deter converts....
(A. N. Wilson, Paul The Mind Of The Apostle, Pimlico. 1998. ISBN 0-7126-6663-X p. 128)

  So now we need to ask, how was circumcision practised then? What was the method used in those days to circumcise someone? This is explained in detail by A. N. Wilson who writes:

  By Roman times, circumcision was done with a metal knife, and, if we believe that Paul did insist on Timothy undergoing circumcision, it is perhaps worth reminding ourselves of the three essential parts of the ritual, without which it is not complete. The first part is milah, the cutting away of the outer part of the foreskin. The is done with one sweep of the knife. The second part, periah, is the tearing of the inner lining of the foreskin which still adheres to the glans, so as to lay it wholly bare. This was (and is) done by the operator - the mohel, the professional circumciser - with his thumb-nail and index finger. The third and essential part of the ritual is mesisah, the sucking of blood from the wound. Since the nineteenth century, it has been permissible to finish this part of the ritual with a swab, but in all preceding centuries and certainly in the time of Paul it was necessary for the mohel to clean the wound by taking the penis into his mouth. In the case of a young adult male such as Timothy the bleeding would have been copious. 12 We can easily imagine why Paul's Gentile converts were unwilling to undergo the ritual; and, given the more liberal attitudes towards the Torah which had already begun to emerge among the Hellenists of Syrian Antioch, it is not surprising that the custom of circumcision should have started to wane. It took the extremism of Paul to think that the knife of circumcision would actually 'cut you . . . off from Christ'. But could any greater contrast be imagined between this belief and the traditional Jewish view that those who did not weild that knife delayed the coming of the Messiah?
(Ibid.,  p. 131)

  In other words, Paul had to take the penis of Timothy in his mouth in order to circumcise him! Note also how strongly Paul opposes circumcision elsewhere in the New Testament:

2: Behold, I Paul say unto you, that, if ye receive circumcision, Christ will profit you nothing.
3: Yea, I testify again to every man that receiveth circumcision, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.
4: Ye are severed from Christ, ye would be justified by the law; ye are fallen away from grace.
5: For we through the Spirit by faith wait for the hope of righteousness.
6: For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision; but faith working through love.
(Gal 5:2-6 American Standard Version)

  However, when it came to saving himself from some trouble, Paul immediately had Timothy circumcised so that the Jews would not bother him further. Since we are aware of Paul's intense opposition to circumcision no matter what, surely his circumcision of Timothy indicates his hidden homosexual desires that he wished to fulfill at least once in his life time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). That he had deep and intense desires to take a penis in his mouth, so when an oppurtunity came along, he decided to avail it.  Hence he now had a good excuse to take a penis in his mouth and no one could object to that. We can suppose that Timothy, a grown man, had an erection within Paul's mouth and eventually ejaculated therein. One cannot claim that someone other than Paul circumcised Timothy because it is clearly stated that it was Paul who circumcised him. There was no pressing need for Paul to circumcise Timothy if indeed he was opposed to the practice as staunchly as related in Galatians. But that he did go along and conducted the circumcision gives us a reason to pause as it suggests he had gay urges.

  Now it is our turn to say, Whatever interpretation Christians may have given to Paul's action later on (correctly or incorrectly), the fact that Paul would put the penis of an adult man in his mouth is shameful and disgusting to say the least.

  Please note that if such a tradition was located within any Islamic literature or in the Qur'an, and if it required to take the private organ within one's mouth, the above is precisely the type of argument Sam Shamoun would have vigorously launched in his papers in order to demonise Muslims and their religion. Hence, the above paragraph is in reality the outcome if one happens to think like a pervert as Sam Shamoun obviously is.

 


Conclusion

  What leads Sam Shamoun to be such a pervert and think like a mindless idiot? Is it because he is so "bright" and "intelligent" that he happens to be the only person on this planet who "understood" the tradition relating to Salha correctly while everyone else on this planet failed to comprehend it? This is surely unlikely, nay, impossible. The reason why Sam Shamoun thinks the way that he does - which leads him to distort, misread and misinterpret simple straightforward passages - is not because he is "bright" but because he is a hatefilled bigot who lacks elementary intelligence. When the two combine and form a unit, that is hate + mediocre intelligence, the result is Shamounion interpretations - which are essentially stupid misreadings of the texts.

  And only God knows best!

 


Addendum: Our Challenge to Sam Shamoun




  The missionary is now required to offer an unconditional apology for concocting and spreading a vicious lie in order to abuse the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the religion of Islam. He is required to remove the factually-erroneous and logically nonsensical paper from his website. If, however, he starts whining over something absolutely irrelevant and besides the point, then that would be taken as an indication of his denial of reality and his severe mental unbalance. Similarly his notorious strategy of sending a number of highly abusive e-mails to Muslims will not accomplish anything to cover his gross misuse and misreading of a non-controversial, straightforward passage. Someone who lacks such elementary intelligence, so much so that it drives him mad to the point of twisting and misusing straightforward passages, has absolutely no right to author papers concerning any aspect of Islam (or any topic for that matter) unless and until he makes an attempt to increase the level of his dwindling mental cognizance.

  We now await for his apology for spreading such a vicious and blatant lie about Islam. We seek the refuge of God from such bigotry, fanaticism and arrogance. 

  

     

Again:

Adult "breastfeeding" was thoroughly proven to be a lie that was invented, just like the bewitchment of Prophet Muhammad and other invented lies.  However, I kept this article for the sake of those who believe in the hadiths by the wholesale.

  

  

Satan was part of the trinity (Ezekiel 28:13-19), then got subtracted (-1):

  

GOD in the OT spoke a poem of regret [1] regarding SatanGOD expresses how regretful He is that all of the Glory that He has created for and given to Satan will no longer be given to him.  It was now given to a lesser second-hand, Jesus, whom otherwise would've received none of it.  Jesus was GOD's plan B not A.

  
Jesus replaced Satan: (Ezekiel 28:13-19). 
Notice the language of how Satan was:
  

1. "You were perfect from the day you were created".  Jesus was also created from the Word of GOD.
2. Glorious.
3. "the chosen one".
4. The "Anointed".
5. ruler over earth.
6. Ruler over the "Holy Mount" of GOD
.

  

Question to every polytheist trinitarian pagan: 

If Jesus replaced Satan, then:

1-  How can Jesus be our Creator?

2-  How can Satan be part of a trinity?

3-  How can Jesus be given the glory that was created for and given to satan, not Jesus, and Jesus still be considered our Creator?

4-  How come Satan was the primary and Jesus was secondary?

  

Of course, there is no Trinity, and Satan was not subtracted from any Trinity.  The above exposes the lie of trinity; a word that does not even exist in any of the Jewish and Christian scriptures (Bibles and outside Bibles).  Also, since we have

  

24 other thrones besides Jesus'

  

And Melchizedek was Jesus' Elder in Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20.  Then, we also clearly have Satan as:

1-  One of the elders and had his throne.

2-  Satan too was Jesus' elder.

3-  When compared to Melchizedek and Satan, Jesus was secondary.

  

Angels are scared of the mighty Satan:

Jude 1:9  Even Michael, the chief angel, did not dare to insult the devil.

  

Using the polytheist trinitarian pagans' illogic, satan was indeed a Mighty Member of the Barfinity, but then got subtracted.  And since satan was subtracted, then Jesus could've also gotten himself subtracted when satan made Jesus covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights.  Do you see now how blasphemous and stupid Christianity is?

  

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit


Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name.  Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.
  
hebrew_2.gif (3861 bytes)

"bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah

  

  

  

  

Four false promises made by Jesus regarding the Holy Spirit:

  
Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23.


1-  Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you.  So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus?  Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself?  You had no need for this.  Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you?  Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie?  The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34).   Jesus was addicted to alcohol.  Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...).  Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan.  Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus?  Or were you someone's girlfriend?  Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan?


         And why did you then keep your eyes??


Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?

  

Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11–13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.

Even the 12th disciple was chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots), - a game of chance, - and not by the Holy Spirit.  Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians.  They are very highly corrupted.  Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell.  Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52?

  

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit


Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name.  Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.
  
hebrew_2.gif (3861 bytes)


"bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah

  

  

2-  If a snake bites you and runs its poison through your blood, it will not hurt you (Mark 16:17-18).  Jesus even promised in the plural that you will be picking up deadly snakes and they will inject their poisons into you and you shall not be harmed!.  This false prophesy is one of the NT's biggest lies, because it never happened.  Not only that, but all Christians who genuinely attempted it in the past were killed by the snakes' poisons.

Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7–10).  There are many problems with this:

1-  Paul is singular.  Jesus' bold promise was in the plural.  "You shall pick up....".  Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison.

2-  It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta.  Some even look like Vipers.  So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one:

"Four species of snakes are present (in the wild) in the Maltese Islands of which three are relatively recent additions. The only indigenous snake is the Western Whip Snake Coluber viridiflavus which is a non-poisonous species. The other three, namely Algerian Whipsnake Coluber algirus, Leopard Snake Elaphe situla and Cat Snake Telescopus fallax have been introduced by man. Of these only the latter has some form of poison. Although snakes appear in the archaeological context (eg. the stone slab in Mus of Archaeology of Gozo - from ggantija, which has a snake on its side) this does not imply that they were poisonous. On the other hand, poisonous species such as Natrix natrix which occurs in nearby Sicily may have been eradicated by man through time." (Source)

3-  Jesus' promise dismally fails, and it is one of the most embarrassing lies, and most dangerous to its followers, in the New Testament, which again and again proves that Jesus was indeed a GOD-sent lying spirit as GOD Almighty deceived false people in the Old Testament.

  

  

Four times Jesus was ignorant about Torah:

  
1-
  No one ever ascended to Heaven before (
John 3:13-14).  Yet, both Elijah and Enoch did in their physical bodies (2 Kings 2:11,  Genesis 5:24).  Where did Enoch and Elijah go to?

John 3:13-14
13 No one has ascended to heaven except He who descended from heaven, even the Son of Man who is in heaven.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up,

2 Kings 2:11
11 As they continued walking and talking, a chariot of fire and horses of fire separated the two of them, and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.

Genesis 5:24
24 Enoch walked with God, and then he was no more because God took him.
  

Again, where did Enoch and Elijah go to?  Jesus' statement is simply a lie.  He didn't know that Elijah, Enoch and others (ex: Uzair or Ezra) were taken up to Heaven by GOD Almighty.  Was he also here a fat drunk as the NT says he was?  Jesus here added Elijah and Enoch to the 39+ list of barfinity (trinity), because we now have Elijah, Enoch and Jesus as their own trinity.

  

Moses was scared to even pass the Judgment:

2-  It was always allowed for the Jews to do work on the Sabbath.  Yet, a good man was commanded by GOD Almighty to be put to death because he collected wood on the Sabbath.  Moses, Aaron and the Priests were scared to pass unjust judgment on the man. Moses had to go up to Yahweh Almighty Himself to ask him specifically about the man.  Yahweh ordered Moses to put him to death.

3-  Jesus didn't know that Jewish landlords who own farms were not allowed to reap 100% of their harvest.  They had to leave the corners for the random passing by needy people from both foreigners and locals, irrespective of what day it is in the week, to eat from.  Sabbath was included.  Yet, Jesus conceded that his disciples were in violation of the Sabbath because they were eating from the farm on the Sabbath.  Was he also here a fat drunk as the NT says he was, and as a result forgot this Torah Law?

4-  The Messiah will be buried deep in the heart of the earth for three days and three nights.  Yet, this doesn't exist anywhere in the Jewish Torah, and ironically, it never happened to Jesus either.  The Romans had to pull the plug on his crucifixion after only 3 hours on the cross because of the Jewish Passover festival, which brought 1/2 million Jewish pilgrims to Jerusalem.  The Romans had to bring him down quickly to prevent untellable chaos.  The soldiers were even denied to eat their meals due to lack of time.  Jesus laid on the floor in a cave-like structure (a tomb), received medical treatment from the women, and then got up and left on the third day.  He never even made it to the third night.  He also was never buried in any coffin or underground. He laid on the floor.  And he never died to even resurrect from death.

  

The Romans had to fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues:
  

  

  

Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23.

  

  

3-  You can lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you.  Not even Jesus, with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle.

4-  Jesus promised the disciples that after he departs it will not be them speaking.  It will be the Holy Spirit will be speaking through their mouths.  Yet, after he departed, they split into Peter and Paul opposing teams, and they started hurling insults and accusations towards each others' teachings, and calling each others:  Anathema (cursed by GOD in Greek), follower of Satan, your Gospel is of the devil, you are a false apostle, you are dogs, and several other serious accusations and insults.

Where was the promised Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above??

Where is Jesus' promise??

-  He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them.
-  They ended up splitting into
Paul vs. Peter two opposing groups, and were at odds with each other on several theological issues.
1 Corinthians 7:40  Paul wasn't sure if he had the Holy Spirit in him or not. He said "I think I have the Holy Spirit".
-  Their differences remain unsettled till this day in the NT.  They were never resolved.

-  12th disciple was also chosen by holy gambling

-  They were barking at each other like
rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic, your gospel is from satan!
[1]  Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians.  They are very highly corrupted.  Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell.  Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52:?


  

Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?

  

Remember:

If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:

Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings.  See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'.  Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.

  

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit


Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name.  Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.
  
hebrew_2.gif (3861 bytes)

"bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah

  

  

The one unforgivable sin?!

Jesus further says:  The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10).  But your entire package that is called the NT and church is the greatest insult and blasphemy against GOD Almighty's Holy Spirit.  It is like a prostitute preaching, and while continuing to prostitute, that the one unforgivable sin is fornication.  How many times did you fornicate and continue to fornicate?  How many times did you lie on the Holy Spirit and continued to lie on the Holy Spirit of GOD Almighty?  Were you also a fat drunk in this one?

  

Was Jesus drunk?

High Concentrations and Intoxication:


Was Jesus also drunk when he decided to castrate and emasculate himself?

  

The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus:

John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus.  The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34).   Jesus was addicted to alcohol:

winebibber
wine·bib·ber
/ˈwīnˌbibər/

a habitual drinker of alcohol.

Matthew 11:19 (NIV)
19 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’ But wisdom is proved right by her deeds.”
  
Luke 7:34 (NIV)
34 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’



"But wisdom is proved right by her deeds"?  What but wisdom is there when people see you drunk and stuffing your face and mouth with food like your life depended on it?  And what Wisdom is there in drinking and being drunk when Yahweh Almighty Himself, your GOD, despises it
?  Hypocrisy and being false, and just wanting to be opposite, are now Wisdom?  What horrible health advice and butt-wisdom are you giving when you allow enjoying alcohol consumption?  People witnessed you regularly getting addicted and drunk.  Did not your toilet spirit teach you that alcohol seriously damages the human body?
  

                                             
Of course it never did!
   (See Holy Spirit of Islam
, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)

  

High Concentrations and Intoxication:


Was Jesus also drunk when he decided to castrate and emasculate himself?  Yes, according to early Christians' writings, Jesus amputated his testicles and the head of his penis. 
  Was the barfing christ drunk??  It is nearly impossible for addicts to remain sober, and to genuinely think and speak responsibly.  All of that holy sh*t and sacred piss revealed from him had high concentrations of alcohol in them.  This explains Jesus' ample confusing and oxymoronic riddles in the NT that turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful; polygamy became sinful and many other examples).  He was not clear-headed (sober).  He was high on ample pooping and peeing himself alcoholic wisdom.  Jesus was also verbally abusive.  Was he walking down the streets at 2:00 am shouting and screaming insults at everyone while being drunk?  And again, was he pooping and peeing himself with some alcohol-heavy holy sh*t and sacred piss?  


People also called him out on his lack of hygiene problems.  Jesus had disregard for personal hygiene (Matthew 15:1-2, Mark 7:1-5).  He emphasized that the outside filth is totally irrelevant.  He probably showered a lot less, had a stench for body odor, and was lice infested
 in his beard and hair, and throughout his clothes and body.  See what Islam says about personal hygiene.  Being physically smelly and filthy is satanic according to the Glorious Quran.  Jesus (the false Jesus of the NT, not the true Isa of Islam) and GOD are Heaven and Hell apart in this.  The NT also says GOD considers John the Baptist great because he never drank alcohol.




Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom:


Jesus:  It is wisdom to drink, get drunk and barf for the sake of appeasing hypocrites and infidels.  I am powerless and desperate and want to commit this sin.  After all, satan also made me covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights.  I was between him and GOD during this period.  That was another wisdom.


Yahweh:  You would not be a great person, nor pleasing to GOD if you drink alcohol.  You drink alcohol you would not be pleasing to GOD, nor would you be considered a great person by GOD.

GOD despised Jesus' hypocritical wisdom that appeased evil and displeased GOD (Luke 1:15).

Luke 1:15
for he (John the Baptist) will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born.

So according to the New Testament itself, we have:

1-  John the baptist.
2-  Barf the baptist.   And I am told to dump Islam and to take this castrated and emasculated brain-stoned addict as my Creator??  The Jesus of Islam is the true Messiah
  .

Is John the Baptist another member of the barfinity?

  

  

Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.

Rebuttals to Sam Shamoun's Articles section.

Answering Trinity.

Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Questions about Jesus that trinitarian Christians don't have logical answers for.

What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth? and Why?

"Allah" was GOD Almighty's original Name in the Bible according to the Hebrew and Aramaic sources.

Scientific Miracles in Islam and the Noble Quran.

Most of the Bible's books and gospels were written by mysterious people!

Jesus mentioned Muhammad by the name in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Did Isaiah 53 really prophesies about the crucifixion of Jesus? It supports Islam's claims about Jesus peace be upon him never died on the cross.  I also addressed John 19:36-37 from the Bible and proved that Jesus never got crucified, since GOD Almighty promised that he will protect Jesus' body and not let even a single bone be broken.  My question to all Christians is: How in the world is it possible for the feet to get nailed on the cross without any penetration to the bones by the nails, hence breaking part of the feet's bones?! I also added refutations to Exodus 12:46, Numbers 9:12, Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 34:20, which supposedly prove the Christians' belief about Jesus crucifixion.  I proved that this dogma has no truth what so ever and exposed the wrong Trinitarian English translation of Zechariah 12:10.

  

The DARKNESS in his porn-full bible; the book of pedophilia, murder, TERRORISM, and women's vaginas and breasts taste like "wine":

 

Terrorism in Islam?! (click here)
Let's look at the real terrorism in the Bibles:

Pedophilia with
3-year old slave girls in the Bible!
Forcing 3-year old slave girls into sex during the Mosaic Law in the Bible! (click here)

Terror in the Bible by a number of Prophets! (click here)

Pregnant women will be ripped open! (click here)

The NT punishes children with death! (click here)

Terrorism:
"kill all the boys and non-virgin women"!
Also under the Mosaic Law! (click here)

Another killing all men, women, children and animals by Moses! (click here)

Another taking all women and children as spoils of war by Moses!
(click here)

Moses was a murderer before he became a Prophet! (click here)

Killing all of the "suckling infants" by the thousands by Saul! (click here)

Dashing little children against rocks in the book of Psalm!
Praising the dashing of little children against rocks as a form of revenge! (click here)

42 innocent children were killed using Wild Bears by Prophet Elisha!
Prophet Muhammad on the other hand loved children even those who threw stones at him in the city of Al-Ta'if. (click here)

Both equal: "Kill Righteous and the wicked"! (click here)

Maiming of the enemies' bodies under Moses' and David's Laws:
Cutting the hands and feet of the enemies in the Bible, and hanging their alive bodies on trees until they DIE.
(click here)

David's Selective Murders!
David so carelessly killed an innocent man for only telling him news.
(click here)

X-Rated Pornography in the Bible, by King Solomon!
Literally, women's vaginas and breasts taste like "wine", and brothers can "suck" their sisters' and lovers' privates!
(click here)

Fathers' fingers into their daughters' vaginas!
Under the Mosaic Law, fathers were allowed to do "Digital Defloration" to their daughters.
(click here)

Shutting the loud mouths of those who unjustly attack Islam, with Truth.

Aisha in Islam:

Let's discuss the age of Aisha being 9 when she married our Prophet (CLICK HERE):

1-  See proofs, in the "Aisha being 9" article, from the Bible about little girls as young as 9 were married off and even sold off by their fathers as slave girls to men who were even older than their fathers.

2-  See also irrefutable proofs that pedophilia and terrorism exist in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).  During the Mosaic times in the Bible's Old Testament, 3-year old slave girls were literally forced into sex under Moses' Orders and Command.  You sometimes have to read things twice to believe them!

See also: Maiming of the enemies' bodies in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).   Cutting the hands and feet of the enemies in the Bible, and hanging their live bodies on trees until they DIE.

*** Killing of innocent children in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

*** X-Rated Pornography in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

*** Fathers sticking their fingers into their daughters' vaginas before marriage in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).


3-
  See also proofs how Aisha's parents were the ones who married her to our Prophet, and that no Muslim or even pagan objected to the marriage because it was widely practiced.  The reason no one objected was:

  1. People used to have very short life-spans in Arabia.   They used to live between 40 to 60 years maximum.  So it was only normal and natural for girls to be married off at ages 9 or 10 or similar.

  2. Marriage for young girls was widely practiced among Arabs back then, and even today in many third-world non-Muslim and Muslim countries.

Please visit: The age of Aisha, girls similar to her in the Bible, and unbelievable pedophilia against 3-year old slave babies in the pedophilic Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Also visit: Why Muta (temporary) Marriage was allowed and why it was discontinued.

  

Again:

I, Osama Abdallah, strongly believe that adult "breastfeeding" is a lie that was invented, just like the bewitchment of Prophet Muhammad and other invented lies.  However, I kept this article for the sake of those who believe in the hadiths by the wholesale.


Send your comments.

Back to Main Page.

  

|
  
  
  

Mary:  Fornicate with you "in my mother's bed" [1].  Are virgin Mary's mother and bed also members of the barfinity ?


200 years no gospels | 24 other thrones besides Jesus' | Jesus was created | Isaiah 53 mistranslations | What's new | A-Z library (3300+ articles) | "Muslims" was the original title | Quran Search | Quran Moral Code (100s of them) | Quran: Bibles are filled with corrupt  قول  qaowl (doctrines of sayings and writings)  | "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah | Jesus said he was powerless | Research & Blog | 9/11 Israel-lie | Youtube

      

  

Quran's STUNNING Divine Miracles: [1]
 

Allah Almighty also promised in several Divine Prophecies that He will show the Glorious Quran's Miracles to mankind.  For example:
  

1-  The root letters for "message" and all of its derivatives occur 513 times throughout the Glorious Quran.  Yet, the Prophets' and Messengers' actual names (Muhammad, Moses, Noah, Abraham, Lot etc....) were also all mentioned 513 times in the Glorious Quran.  See detailed listing here.


Coincidence?
  See 1,000s of examples! [1]. (zip file).

Quran's Stunning Numerical & Scientific Miracles.

Stunning Prophecies [2] [3]

 

2-  Allah Almighty said that Prophet Noah lived for 950 years.  Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the entire Noble Surah (chapter Noah) is exactly written in 950 Letters.  You can thoroughly see the accurate count in the scanned images.

3-  Allah Almighty in the Glorious Quran said that earth is:
  

       -  Spherical: "egg-shaped" [1].
       -  Is rotating around itself.
       -  Is moving in space in curvy orbits [2].
       -  Is traveling through the constantly expanding universe [3].
  

"When the sky disintegrates, and turns rose colored like paint (وردة كالدهان)." (The Noble Quran, 55:37) [2] [3]
  
As we also see from the picture, Noble Verse 55:37 is a Divine Promise (Allah promised to show mankind) that mankind will actually see this come to pass one day.  NASA and other space agencies, by Allah Almighty's Will, have certainly fulfilled this Prophecy, because a natural rose wouldn't form when a "Heaven" or a Solar System or even an entire galaxy and its
trillions of solar systems all blow up (explode).  It is rather the look of it, and this is exactly what NASA confirms.

 

Coincidence?  See 1,000s of examples [1].Quran's Stunning Numerical & Scientific Miracles.

  
Islam also thoroughly rejects as man-made lies the Trinity and Crucifixion [2].  Jesus was also thoroughly called
slave of GOD [1] in both the OT and NT.


Quran:  All Bibles are mostly of corrupt [1] قول   (Quran 10:94 and 10s others discussed).  See also the 39+ members of trinity.  Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

  

John 5:30  "I cannot do anything on my own."  (i.e., Jesus could not perform a single Miracle without GOD sending it down to him first!).  I can not perform a single Miracle on my own!!  I am totally POWERLESS without Allah Almighty!
  

John 5:31  "if I (Jesus) bear witness of myself, then I would be a liar!" 

GOD didn't talk this way when He spoke to Moses.  GOD's testimony alone is always sufficient!  Jesus also bowed his face down to the ground, like we Muslims  (Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name, and sons and daughters of GOD titles will be "no more";    ; Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40)  Muslims do everyday, and prayed to GOD Almighty.